1411:
the content could be viewed as unfavorable to the organisation, even though it was all backed up with links to legitimate media. I'm uncertain why she's got such a heart on for them other than she seems to have a relationship of some kind with them (COI, right?) They're just another govt body blowing tax payer money but by all means cover up their mis steps if you feel its appropriate. As far as your suggestion I get cracking on other articles, everyone's an editor no one's a contributor. You guys should knuckle down yourselves and write some stuff for other people to edit. My level of academic expertise is in this subject, I'm somewhat of an authority on it, I even get asked to give lectures on the subject, (really), not because my opinion is biased as you infer but because it is well informed. But because you have stepped in at the request of your friend to back her in her quest to make it all 'rosie round there' (her request is right up there above this bit, but you did read her edits didn't you, she fabricated a quote from the PM for some unknown reason and quickly deleted it when I pointed it out) your going to deprive people of this information. That doesn't really make sense to me at all. You make it sound like I'm making this shit up but I haven't linked to a single opinion or comment from myself. These are not my views, they are the views of informed journalists, all of whom work for major newspapers and are considered authorities on their subjects. I do share some of their opinions, do you? Does that matter when you're referencing the original articles? That may be uncomfortable for Robyn or the organisation to embrace but there it is in pixel on screen, and it's totally relevant to the NZ on Air story, which you're absolutely welcome to read up on and contribute to. There's plenty of stuff in the history section to wade through and understand.
1341:
the editors, there's you pulled in by robyn, and another guy. The guy at the top of this post pulled you up on your editing without justifying what you did, and that's pretty much just today. So that's 3 people on the chop team. Maybe there are other people who care about how this page is shaped who will get involved, the more the merrier. But regardless of that I'm interested in this article showing all sides of the situation. Can you contribute to that? I personally think NZ on Air has been responsible for some very good things. like the new audioculture site and some impressive funding through most of the 90s. It's also been responsible for some disturbing stuff. So if someone was to use Wiki for something like research on an article don't you think it would be useful to have access to all this information? If they want the glowing stuff they can get that on the NZ on air website. I'm doing my best to link in stuff that is backed by informed journalism. I think I've done that. I'd like to see you add something to the page instead of taking it away. Go on, google something
1749:, because IDONTLIKEIT, is completely unacceptable. No editor (or editors working on articles from country X) are entitled to delete material that meets WP:LISTPEOPLE on the assertions that a Prime Minister is "pretty minor." That an Olympic and World Champion is "pretty minor." Wholly absurd. Disruptive. And doing it the second time, after having been communicated with three times, but still sticking to the "oh, they're just random minor individuals" ridiculous assertion is certainly disruptive blanking. And we have had people blocked for continued blanking without credible reason -- and they need not violate 3RR to be disruptive. But I had not yet reported it because even after the revert following the three communications (one on this talk page), and even after that last revert maintained the same "pretty minor" empty explanation, I chose to first warn. Warnings are meant to address the issue before it rises to the level of requiring Admin action, and I left a very long explanation with the warning as to why it was being given.
1236:
no comment from myself. The controversy of NZ on Air is a big part of their legacy as the large number of articles discussing it demonstrate, (and interestingly very few articles discussing the positives but I'm happy to see what ever is present and not a press release linked into the picture for balance). To exclude it from this page or over sanitize the issues presents a false picture of the organisation and its activities which is not in the interests of the wiki page reader. It is what it is and I take on board your advice of how to present this material. I would happily accept some wording suggestions. sometimes it's not a matter of the information, but how it is presented. I've made a few changes as per your comments and hope they're going in the right direction. It's an interesting and complex topic with a lot of underlying implications for govt and social impact.
1275:
provided links to many many articles on the subject. I do find it disconcerting that the 'editors' complain that there is no rebuttal article linked but fail to do a quick google themselves to include it. instead they just delete. Robyn actually works with them and interacts with them to get her information for her site, so I'm assuming she has some sort of conflict of interest. I'm not sure how to explain her enthusiasm for removing unfavorable light from the article. The reality of NZ on Air is very much shades of grey, and it's really interesting to watch it develop. Who knows what we'll think of the events of the last 5 years in 20 years time but for now they're relevant and n 20 years time we can delete them if they become unimportant.
1535:
into main stream. Journals of this calibre don't accept contributions unless they are kosher. Note that in a public discussion at
Dargaville recently the two disagreed on the origin of the ship despite the fact that the evidence strongly supports (at this early stage) it being a Dutch ship. When (if) they finally get around to digging it out (Time Team where are you?)it will be easy to prove one way or the other, as Dutch ships of that era had a unique construction method. RC Dating is now quite accurate so I think the date is settled, which in term of history just about rules out the Portuguese,although Spanish ships are in some cases, identical.
118:
section, that is mostly the other users deleting that. Please don't assume I have a bias against the college. Seriously a win in a 10-school competition isn't a big thing. Have a proper look though the history of the school (going back over 90 years) and find when it has won
National competitions. Concentrate on putting stuff in the article that is unique to the school, not that same stuff any other school could say, eg not things like "strong belief in allowing students to reach their full potential" (not that you said that, but that sort of thing ). -
102:
odd win in local competitions 2-3 years back doesn't count as important (if you think it does, raise your expectations)", this shows you must have a bias against the college as many other schools have in their sports section about their previous sporting achievements in competitions. Another example of you blatant bias is your comment "Nothing special compared to other schools here", when most other school pages have "fluff" about sports, I will alliterate that I can understand your copyright point, and it has been noticed.
1017:
889:
the book, it's all factual and with a timeline there's no other way we can see to do it. I am brand new to
Knowledge (XXG) so please bear with me while we make some changes. We will also be adding some updated photos and will bring some things up to date, it's something we'll be working on as time permits. I have also left a reply on my talk page but thought I'd send this off to you on your page, still a bit of confusion my end as to how to do things. Cheers (
1395:
sure there are many other articles you could edit and have no problems keeping within NPOV. However what will probably happen is you will keep trying to change the NZOA article to reflect your viewpoint and if it doesn't you'll get discouraged and leave wikipedia (and the NZOA article will reflect a lot less of your views that it would have if you'd worked with others) Net loss to everybody but your decision if you want to have a long term impact here or not -
22:
2266:
2178:
2103:
1937:
1202:
801:, not the version hosted by a partisan advocacy group. This is a common issue throughout many edits, with stuff and nzherald ref'd when hansard and others should be used. (b) The "so-called" in "Similarly for the so-called Sensible Sentencing Trust." is another example of systematic overlooking of day-to-day neutrality. (c) Lack of understanding of
2061:
1561:
You blanked a notability section, questioning the notability of the people. The people listed are notable by wp standards. And frankly, calling a Prime
Minister and an Olympic athlete non-notable is absurd, by any stretch of the imagination. They all have wp articles. And such a section is typical
1235:
Hi Simon. Thanks for taking an interest in the NZ on Air page. There is no conflict of interest on my part as all my entries are strictly from music policy and political commentators. I have made efforts to summarize the content of the articles linked to but will attempt to do it in a way that holds
1119:
PechaKucha is a registered tradename. It's not "marketing fluff" to point out that use of the term must be negotiated with its owners. It's not "fluff" at all, much less "marketing" fluff. It's a legal requirement. And deleting a passage in part because a link is broken isn't constructive. Fixing the
264:
Most sure, but there will still be 20 with references. Then people come along and add the name that "all their friends use". It was a nightmare. Then people say "we'll only have the 5 most important ones" and argue over which those 5 are (cause they vary from place to place and group to group). So in
1534:
Hi, I am familiar with his unusual take on history but in this case he is not the author. The author appears to be a genuine scientist though I could not see much about him.I think the fact that 2 separate streams of evidence support the same conclusion take this out of the realms of a history rave
1410:
I'm sure you're editing the article because you care about wikipedia but the same comments you've made about my motivation can just as easily be leveled at Robyn2000, who was the original 'editor' of the content, not because she cared about accuracy in wikipedia but because she was concerned some of
888:
Hi Simon - just leaving a message here regards the Eden Park page you reverted. I work at Eden Park and have been asked to keep any eye on the Wiki page and update it etc. The chronology you deleted is indeed from a book written by our park historian. We don't have any problems with it coming from
431:
I agree the image deletion has left some gaps that need filling, images have to be found that fit the early selections and probably the latter sections once Avenue has finish. Text squeezing was mentioned at a GA I was involved in a while back, so I am assuming it is even stricter at FA. On my small
1340:
I am neutral. I do not interact with in any context this organisation. I don't apply for grants, I don't consult, I don't write for them, I don't do websites about them. I have a lot of information about them which I share here and obviously I have an opinion based on what I've read. As far as all
933:
The orthographic question is independent of the issue I raise on the talk page, but still nettlesome, since there are two trademark filings - one covers "PechaKuchaNight", the other "Pecha Kucha Night" -- while the popular press (and as you point out, the organization's own website) haven't exactly
101:
I have learned what you have found wrong about the articles sports section, but I believe it is unnecessary to keep deleting the
Notable Alumni section. In 2012 the school logo was "revamped", so I also thought it would be necessary to update the Knowledge (XXG) page as well. With your comment "The
1394:
Lets put it this way. We are editing the article because we care about wikipedia. You are editing the article because you care about getting the "truth" about NZOA in there. Your knowledge and resources would be put to much better use updating various other articles (on NZ music for instance). I'm
1274:
No, don't interact with the organisation at all in real life. I am merely an observe, and I go to lengths to keep it that way. My interest is in the political aspects of it. There is a huge amount of debate about the organisation and its activities. I've tried to bring this to the article and have
1161:
A lot of his content seems to be a referenced to opinion pieces and speculation (including a comment I left on my own blog!) and seems to only be controversial to him. The article is becoming pretty cumbersome at the moment but I'm not sure how to pull it back on track. It's not quite an edit war,
396:
I see you have started adding back photos and in your edit summary did not understand why they were removed. It was basicly to reduce text squeezing and page size. We can develop consensus at the talk page as to what photos should be used, but we can't go back to the number we had. Also some have
1509:
Sorry I didn't provide a ref for the 3news.co.nz spam thing on my edit. While they are a legit news source they also publish AP/reuters articles. Somebody at their company is going though and putting these into high-profile articles that have nothign to do with New
Zealand (where they might have
1315:
That's not what I'm saying. You've happily stepped into the nz on air article for a friend, without researching the topic. I'm asking you to research the topic and understand the content before putting your muscle behind someone's personal bias . That is what wiki is about. Correct? Work with me
1258:
Conflict of interest refers to you personally. Eg are you a person who interacts with NZ On Air in real life? Are you critical of them in other forums? Generally editors should avoid editing articles in areas they have strong views on. We already have an editor in the NZ area editing articles to
416:
I see of the copyright problems and are not adding back those. However the removal of a large number of photos means that the article has several bland text-only sections which make it ugly and less informative. I am not sure you adversion to "text squeezing" but a page of nothing but plain text
117:
I'd check the copyright on the logo you uploaded, it is in line to be deleted soon. There is a magic wikipedia link for "just because we other articles have this crap then it doesn't make it right that your article does" so please don't use that arguement. I have no comment on the
Notable Alumni
1642:
And the reason that I warned you, is that despite my communications with you continued to delete them all on the assertion that the Prime
Minister, Olympic Champion/World Champion, etc. were "pretty minor" and "random". That sort of editing behavior requires a warning when talk page discussion
1889:
Just a quick check regarding reverted edits on the LCA, OSDC, and White Camel award pages. I may have missed a
Knowledge (XXG) policy, but all those pages already contain links to people who don't yet have wikipedia entries. If the policy is to remove links to people not yet on wikipedia, then
285:
Keeping alternative names, makes this article more user friendly. In the end, we are building a useful collection of data on
Knowledge (XXG). I have no interest in discussing the fundamental purpose of wikipedia with you here, however what you have edited out of this article has decreased its
558:
What does 'forwarded ported' mean? I have spent hours and hours adding information to the version you have reverted to - which is simply a copy of information taken from the Depatment of Corrections website. The Department has a very biased POV and strong COI. Most of what is on that page is
465:
Now then, I still would argue that there is place for a mention of the show's premiere. You explained that exceptions are granted for TV shows of extreme magnitude. I'd argue that the Funday PawPet Show is the internet equivalent of such a show. As far as I can tell, there simply is no other
1632:
Furthermore, I of course did communicate with you. Not just in two edit summaries. But also on this talk page. And despite that, you still again deleted the entire list. Including the Prime Minister. And including the World Champion/Olympic Champion. Despite them meeting WP:LISTPEOPLE
1153:
I've tried discussing this on the person's talk page, and we've had a bit of a chat. I've given him links about Knowledge (XXG) style, but he seems highly suspicious of my motives and has accused me of trying to "sanitise" the content and of writing a "puff piece". And he's just mentioned
307:
Read the old version. Read what I said above, Everybody has their own "common" name that they complain is missing. They all need references. The article is not a suitable place for it. If you want to keep such a list then do it external to wikipedia and we can link to it in the article. -
1701:
implicitly the only notable people from a major city. How can you possibly think that or say that, if you've edited such lists at wikipedia. Or even looked at them. There are a great number of such embedded lists, of course, as this one, but even look at the longer stand-alone lists
2115:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
371:
and could do with some help/advice. So far I have just been adding references with the odd bit of copy-editing (and some reasonably major changes that no one has objected to...yet). Should probably get consensus for some of my ideas and have left a, probably incomplete, list at the
461:
First off, I'd like to apologize. When I read the guidelines for date articles, I missed the line about TV shows and movies. You are right, it does apply. Having not seen that rule, and seeing that my edit was removed with no listed reason, I assumed that it was an edit in error.
466:
original-content internet broadcast that a) has been airing as long, or b) has a viewerbase as large (reaching over 400 people while live, and with many more downloading the recording later). I'm a bit curious whether or not this could have any bearing on the guideline or not.
1149:
article, specifically to do with "controversies". I don't know exactly who this person is, but it seems they are highly critical of NZ On Air and have added so much to the article about the supposed controversies that it's making up the most of the article.
2036:
I wonder if you might be interesting in helping out in March at an edit-a-thon at the University of Auckland's Gus Fisher Gallery on Saturday March 5, as they would greatly benefit from having an experienced Wikipedian on hand to assist the new editors:
905:
Hi again Simon - appreciated your feedback thanks.Today I just put a couple of things into the present tense (or past) regarding the redevelopment. You have written it so well it didn't need any alteration as such. Thanks! Just so you know! cheers
1335:
the other editors are on this another, this would normally be a red light. As for COI, well if I google what I suspect your name is and "NZ On Air" I get back a lot of hits so please don't pretend you are neutral on this. - 06:24, 7 June 2013
1779:
First of all -- the "pretty minor" assertion of course related to the notability of the individuals ("The people listed are pretty minor"), saying that the Prime Minister was pretty minor, and the Olympic and World Champion was pretty minor,
713:
554:
I gather you have reverted much of the editing I have done on the Dept of Corrections page. You left this note. (rv to version as of 22:15, 8 October 2011. Changes since then highly NPOV. Some corrections need to be forwarded ported.)
652:
590:
665:. The Policy, and especially the first two sections of the "Mediation" section, should be read if you have never participated in formal mediation. For a short guide to accepted cases, see the "Accepted requests" section of the
483:
seriously 400 people is nothing. The smallest TV show is going to reach 100 times as many. 1000s of blogs are read by more people and plenty of video shows on youtube etc. I'd be pretty happy with having the wikipedia entry -
2311:
2221:
2143:
1911:
You edits are not improving the article, they are scattering red text in it. You also imply that an article on you should be created by having links to it (which is not very sporting). But especially the first -
1994:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
676:
As mediation proceedings begin, be aware that formal mediation can only be successful if every participant approaches discussion in a professional and civil way, and is completely prepared to compromise. Please
1592:
You seem to still not get it. You just wrote to me in your edit summary to my last message on this page that you reverted my "poor edit twice" and that I "refsued to take this to the talk page of the article".
1577:
Please discuss this on the talk page. You appear to have picked some random ones out of the hat, certainly not ones that would normally be ranked towards the top. Take it to the talk page for the article.. -
1601:
First of all, my add was not a poor edit. As I've told you many times now, your continued deletions of, for example, a Prime Minister and an Olympic and World champion on the absurd assertion that they
584:
has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Department of Corrections (New Zealand)". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation.
1890:
shouldn't the other red links be corrected as well? I am aware there's a policy against people editing pages about themselves, although I did not believe this extended to something as simple as links.
1610:" is unacceptable. Especially since you were communicated with in two edit summaries, and on your talkpage above, and still continued to delete. It was your deletions that were improper, not the adds.
2295:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2205:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
2127:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1358:
Not having a financial relationship with an entity doesn't preclude an inability to follow NPOV. Certainly from where I'm standing your edits imply a strongly held POV on NZOA, I'm completely with
1105:
just sounds like marketing fluff and doesn't add anything to the article (which is already a bit top-heavy with details of the ownership and licensing). Oh and your reference link was broken too -
1784:
to their connection to the city. Second of all, being born in a city (or a country, for that matter) is usually seen as sufficient nexus, and sufficiently relevant, if the RSs have reported it.--
1083:-- could you explain the term "T&C", how one sentence is somehow the "full T&C", and why (in terms of current guidelines and policies) this kind of thing isn't allowed on Knowledge (XXG)?
1732:
Furthermore, as you know -- I've no problem with people adding to the list. Just the opposite. Feel free to yourself add to this one -- as long as your add comports with the requirements of
2280:
2191:
1948:
1819:
people in many larger cities, for which we have hundreds of stand-alone lists, and probably tens of thousands of embedded lists. And we have many more lists of people, as you can see at
559:
inaccurate. I would like to return it to the latest version of mine. If you have concerns about particular edits please inform me rather that just arbitrarily deleting weeks of work.
651:. The case will be assigned to an active mediator within two weeks, and mediation proceedings should begin shortly thereafter. Proceedings will begin at the case information page,
2081:
to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.
176:
If you read Gadfium's talk page you'll notice that we discussed this issue and it has been noted that most material on schools in general is difficult to independently source.
2076:
1666:
1959:
during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.
1661:
Adding a list of six people, and then two people, as being (implicitly) the only notable people from a major city is at least controversial. We've had this discussion at
589:
is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the
2038:
2030:
1103:
Under negotiated terms, a series of presentations in PechaKucha format may be held at events other than PechaKucha Nights if described as "Powered by PechaKucha"
1217:. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
866:
230:(click and look) is our reason. We are not talking a couple of alternative names, we are talking dozens. As the comment states please read the old talk pages. -
1736:. That's precisely how such lists on wikipedia grow -- look at the history of any of them, they've grown iteratively over time through the additions of others.
1488:
829:
825:
670:
1684:
I understand that you two work together on New Zealand articles. But this isn't an "editors who edit New Zealand articles together" issue, but rather a
731:
1379:
The same could be said of Robyn2000 then. Does she have a NPOV? Does knowledge of a subject exclude you from having a NPOV? it get's tricky doesn't it?
1259:
reflect his political opinions by putting every piece of negative information about a subject he can find in an article. This isn't something we want -
1511:
666:
598:
432:
screen it certainly does look bad. Either way the article is watched by 700 odd people so hopefully we can reach a consensus realatively quickly.
1036:, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the
662:
594:
2334:
2244:
2157:
2019:
1542:
293:
1331:
Robyn alerted me to the article, I'm certainly not tilting it as a favour to her. Please note that you seem to be on one side of this but
367:
Hi Simon. I have been spamming everyone about the New Zealand article and thought I would drop you a line too. I am hoping to get it to
1300:
I'm sorry but I am not comfortable with tilting an article on the promise of providing content. That is not what wikipedia is about. -
1037:
640:
265:
the end we took them all out and it's worked fairly well. Note that many other pages dont' list all alternative names, for example the
862:
605:
Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 14 April 2012.
2072:
1867:
and stop harassing me on social media. If you have any problems with any edits I have made, leave a comment on the talk page. -
703:
648:
620:
581:
2330:
2240:
2153:
2068:
2015:
540:
2304:
2214:
2136:
1213:
without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Knowledge (XXG) with an
1827:
do is delete the list of six people. Including a Prime Minister. And an Olympic and World Champion. On the assertion that
1623:, and a person may be included in a list of people if all the requirements in WP:LISTPEOPLE are met, which was the case here.
1798:
68:
63:
58:
52:
46:
40:
133:
1016:
2006:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
938:
notable topics. Still, the current official rendering appears to be "PechaKucha"; the question is how to respect that.
2316:
2226:
2148:
2011:
202:
798:(a) The source given for "Ombudsmen's own-motion investigation of Department of Corrections" should be the original
2086:
179:
However, I have just managed to find a source regarding the opt-out policy so hopefully this ends the discussion.
1619:
And as to all such additions to such a list, the page that reflects our notability policy for lists of people is
1484:, referring to it as spam? I've reinstated the reference and would be grateful if you could justify that for me.
1031:
252:
213:
1214:
78:
1820:
1546:
678:
2292:
2202:
2124:
297:
1831:
are "pretty minor" people. I made that point three times to Simon, and he kept deleting on that same basis.--
1180:
I've removed a bunch of the minor ones. I'll let some other people know to keep an eye on the article too. -
1947:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
1746:
1733:
1685:
1620:
1538:
1289:
1247:
528:
347:
Slightly better I guess but I'd hope we can find something that is more unique to Auckland at some point -
289:
161:
1956:
1940:
1929:
1806:
1770:
1723:
as well -- for most countries, I would expect. The same holds for all of them. They won't be exhaustive.
1499:
1466:
1443:
1367:
874:
856:
810:
781:
741:
616:
564:
507:
473:
155:
110:
2007:
1665:. SimonLyall is not acting improperly in removing this list. I note that this has led to a discussion at
1226:
1218:
934:
been orthographically consistent over the years. Worse, "PechaKucha" and "PechaKucha Night" appear to be
586:
536:
2082:
1065:
998:
772:(which is an ad for a book not a book) would be completely out of the question, even if the book were a
643:
of the dispute concerning Department of Corrections (New Zealand), in which you were listed as a party,
337:
958:
844:
151:
106:
1162:
but I fear it's getting messy (and I don't want things to get to a Satellite Spies level of nuttery).
1142:
Hey Simon. It's Robyn Gallagher. As a knowledgable NZ Wikipedian, I'd like your opinion on something.
333:
1964:
1836:
1789:
1754:
1648:
1567:
1491:
and occurred in the second line of the second paragraph of the 'Racing history' section of the page.
1098:
1024:
503:
469:
245:
206:
2274:
2185:
2111:
1983:
1974:
532:
1872:
1170:
1125:
1088:
943:
734:
721:
2288:
2198:
2120:
2003:
1987:
1864:
1720:
802:
699:
689:
183:
84:
907:
890:
1802:
1766:
1671:
1662:
1495:
1462:
1439:
1435:
1416:
1384:
1363:
1346:
1321:
1283:
1241:
870:
852:
806:
777:
737:
612:
560:
443:
408:
387:
138:
2300:
2210:
2132:
1999:
1991:
1222:
1206:
736:(that last is a specially crafted persistent URL, most URLs on that site aren't persistent).
2323:
2233:
2046:
1801:
and it's immediate sub cats have 1000 members, you seriously want 1000 people listed there?
1458:
1061:
994:
373:
187:
80:
21:
2303:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2296:
2213:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2206:
2135:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
2128:
2002:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1995:
1952:
1944:
1960:
1913:
1832:
1785:
1750:
1644:
1579:
1563:
1515:
1396:
1359:
1301:
1260:
1181:
1106:
911:
894:
799:
755:
485:
418:
348:
309:
270:
231:
119:
1710:
of them are "exhaustive". Nothing of the sort is implied -- because it's never the case.
773:
608:
Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
368:
1703:
824:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at
661:
this to your watchlist. Formal mediation is governed by the Mediation Committee and its
1868:
1562:
in similar articles across our vast project. I've edited thousands of such sections.--
1278:
And yeah, I've got access to screeds of photos, work with me and I might work with you.
1166:
1158:
in our talk page chat, so I feel like I can't have a reasonable conversation with him.
1121:
1084:
939:
717:
1438:
has since alerted me to the COI requirements which I'm now familiarising myself with.
191:
1901:
1155:
966:
685:
1936:
1412:
1380:
1342:
1317:
1279:
1237:
433:
398:
377:
2265:
2177:
2102:
603:
please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate.
2042:
1481:
1047:
923:
397:
been removed due to copyright concerns and should not be added back in at all.
1431:
653:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for mediation/Department of Corrections (New Zealand)
269:
page only has a couple not the hundreds. Maybe this is a wikitionary thing. -
1480:
Hi Simon, just a little bit confused as to why you removed my reference from
1210:
1146:
82:
1461:
and justify how the coastline length is not a meaningless number? Cheers,
244:
Most of those are insignificant and uncitable and would not be mentioned.
1897:
828:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "
2338:
2307:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2248:
2217:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2161:
2139:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2090:
2060:
2050:
2023:
1968:
1921:
1905:
1876:
1840:
1815:
Stuart -- Did I add 1,000? I added 6. But, as you might expect, we have
1810:
1793:
1774:
1758:
1675:
1652:
1607:
1587:
1571:
1550:
1523:
1503:
1470:
1447:
1420:
1404:
1388:
1371:
1350:
1325:
1309:
1293:
1268:
1251:
1230:
1201:
1189:
1174:
1129:
1114:
1092:
1069:
1054:
1002:
983:
947:
915:
898:
878:
814:
785:
763:
745:
725:
693:
624:
568:
544:
511:
493:
477:
446:
426:
411:
390:
356:
341:
317:
301:
278:
259:
239:
220:
165:
142:
127:
2284:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
2195:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1990:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
1145:
There's a person (Nzindie) who has been adding a lot of stuff to the
1765:
In each case their connection to the city is "pretty minor" IMHO.
1943:, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for
1697:
Your comment stunned me. Lists of notable people from city X are
2320:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
2230:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1669:, which is more appropriate than issuing warnings about blocks.-
769:
2310:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
2278:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
2220:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
2142:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1514:, they have had over 20 accounts blocked sicne this started. -
2189:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
1955:
with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of
1011:
669:. You may also want to familiarise yourself with the internal
266:
85:
15:
2059:
1949:
Knowledge (XXG):Miscellany for deletion/User:SimonLyall/test
1430:
Hi Simon thanks for cleaning up the links I'd placed to the
502:
That's fair enough. I just wanted some thoughts on that.
1209:. I noticed that you recently removed some content from
2291:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2201:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
2123:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1603:
1081:
1028:
was updated with a news item that involved the article
962:
931:
657:
227:
1823:. For those lists, we follow wp:listpeople. What we
1667:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style/Stand-alone lists
1512:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_New_Zealand#3News_link_spam
2056:
File:NZ wiki meetup 200606a.jpg listed for discussion
1643:
fails, and if all else fails does require a block.--
2039:
Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Auckland/ArtAndFeminism 2016
2031:
Knowledge (XXG):Meetup/Auckland/ArtAndFeminism 2016
865:). You are invited to comment on the discussion at
328:
Removing picture of Sky Tower in Auckland’s article
1060:It's pretty busy there! Thanks for creating it. --
1982:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
1745:But deletion of an appropriate list, which meets
957:Hello Simon. May I know, how did you find use of
867:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for comment/Offender9000
993:Hello Simon, thanks for the date correction. --
826:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
768:I was trying to say is that inserting the URL
1316:means create a good article, not destroy it.
8:
730:My two cents can be summarised in two URLs
2172:
253:
246:
214:
207:
830:Department of Corrections (New Zealand)
754::) . I'm not 100% sure what you mean -
524:Thanks for the tidy-up. Appreciated.
2067:A file that you uploaded or altered,
1076:rv of "Powered by PechaKucha" passage
105:Best regards and hope you understand
7:
2275:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
2186:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
2112:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
2073:Knowledge (XXG):Files for discussion
2293:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2259:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
2203:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2169:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
2125:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
839:RFC discussion of User:Offender9000
574:Formal mediation has been requested
201:There is no reason not to list the
2096:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
172:Palmerston North Boy's High School
14:
2109:Hello, SimonLyall. Voting in the
2008:review the candidates' statements
417:certainly is not more readable -
2264:
2176:
2101:
1935:
1487:The citation in question was to
1200:
1015:
989:Lightning talk – Date correction
20:
2314:and submit your choices on the
2224:and submit your choices on the
2146:and submit your choices on the
2069:File:NZ wiki meetup 200606a.jpg
1608:some random ones out of the hat
132:The link you're thinking of is
2091:19:18, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
2014:. For the Election committee,
1984:Arbitration Committee election
1975:ArbCom elections are now open!
847:has been filed concerning the
633:Request for mediation accepted
1:
2339:00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
2249:00:03, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
2162:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
2051:16:42, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
2024:22:14, 30 November 2015 (UTC)
1799:Category:People_from_Auckland
1551:22:45, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
1471:16:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
1070:07:12, 16 February 2013 (UTC)
1055:12:19, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
1003:16:59, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
770:http://www.flyingblind.co.nz/
684:For the Mediation Committee,
1969:20:53, 21 October 2015 (UTC)
1524:07:52, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
1504:22:15, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
984:06:29, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
641:request for formal mediation
623:of the Mediation Committee.
569:23:25, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
447:11:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
427:10:40, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
412:10:32, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
391:23:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
357:18:22, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
342:15:18, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
332:Ok I’ve put something else…
318:19:17, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
302:19:12, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
279:06:11, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
260:22:44, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
240:18:19, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
221:14:38, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
166:06:47, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
143:23:09, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
128:21:58, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
2010:and submit your choices on
671:Procedures of the Committee
192:00:53, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
171:
2357:
2331:MediaWiki message delivery
2241:MediaWiki message delivery
2154:MediaWiki message delivery
2016:MediaWiki message delivery
1906:12:44, 30 April 2015 (UTC)
1877:20:02, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
815:08:36, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
786:03:06, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
764:01:13, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
746:22:48, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
726:22:14, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
694:19:49, 16 April 2012 (UTC)
512:08:02, 30 March 2011 (UTC)
494:10:35, 27 March 2011 (UTC)
478:21:01, 24 March 2011 (UTC)
1841:10:21, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1811:10:15, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1794:10:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1775:10:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1759:09:37, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1676:09:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1653:09:01, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1588:08:09, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1572:07:57, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
1510:original reporting). See
1130:03:46, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
1115:10:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
1093:09:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
1032:2013 Russian meteor event
899:01:32, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
879:05:58, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
706:the Mediation Committee.)
667:Guide to formal mediation
625:07:41, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
599:guide to formal mediation
545:08:36, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
2328:to your user talk page.
2238:to your user talk page.
1917:
1821:Category:Lists of people
1583:
1519:
1448:12:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)
1421:12:00, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1405:11:30, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1400:
1389:07:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1372:07:33, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1351:06:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1326:06:14, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1310:06:04, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1305:
1294:05:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1269:03:04, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1264:
1252:02:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
1231:20:11, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
1190:06:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
1185:
1175:05:33, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
1110:
948:15:59, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
916:01:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
759:
681:if anything is unclear.
489:
422:
352:
313:
274:
235:
123:
1922:09:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
595:formal mediation policy
457:Re: November 28 Article
2064:
1951:and please be sure to
228:what we had previously
94:John McGlashan College
2289:Arbitration Committee
2272:Hello! Voting in the
2199:Arbitration Committee
2183:Hello! Voting in the
2121:Arbitration Committee
2071:, has been listed at
2063:
1988:Arbitration Committee
1457:Hi, can you hop over
1022:On 15 February 2013,
712:Discussion has begun
679:contact the Committee
611:Message delivered by
1957:User:SimonLyall/test
1941:User:SimonLyall/test
1930:User:SimonLyall/test
1165:What do you reckon?
1099:Terms and conditions
845:request for comments
1992:arbitration process
649:Mediation Committee
582:Mediation Committee
134:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
2305:arbitration policy
2215:arbitration policy
2137:arbitration policy
2065:
2004:arbitration policy
1953:sign your comments
1928:MfD nomination of
820:dispute resolution
794:A couple of points
2341:
2256:
2255:
2251:
2075:. Please see the
1663:Talk:Christchurch
1541:comment added by
1044:
1043:
707:
645:has been accepted
627:
548:
531:comment added by
292:comment added by
226:For this article
91:
90:
2348:
2329:
2327:
2268:
2239:
2237:
2180:
2173:
2105:
2083:ShakespeareFan00
1939:
1674:
1604:are pretty minor
1553:
1296:
1254:
1204:
1052:
1019:
1012:
981:
976:
971:
716:. See you soon,
697:
660:
610:
547:
525:
441:
406:
385:
304:
257:
250:
218:
211:
203:alternate titles
168:
141:
86:
24:
16:
2356:
2355:
2351:
2350:
2349:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2321:
2269:
2261:
2231:
2171:
2166:
2165:
2106:
2098:
2058:
2034:
2012:the voting page
1978:
1933:
1884:
1882:Reverted edits?
1861:
1670:
1559:
1536:
1532:
1530:RE Noel Hilliam
1478:
1455:
1428:
1426:Eventfinda page
1287:
1245:
1198:
1140:
1120:link would be.
1078:
1048:
1038:candidates page
1010:
991:
977:
972:
967:
955:
928:
886:
841:
822:
796:
710:
709:
674:
656:
635:
630:
629:
606:
576:
526:
522:
520:The Master Game
459:
435:
400:
379:
365:
330:
287:
199:
174:
159:
137:
96:
87:
81:
29:
12:
11:
5:
2354:
2352:
2312:the candidates
2281:eligible users
2270:
2263:
2262:
2260:
2257:
2254:
2253:
2222:the candidates
2192:eligible users
2181:
2170:
2167:
2144:the candidates
2107:
2100:
2099:
2097:
2094:
2057:
2054:
2033:
2027:
1981:
1977:
1972:
1932:
1926:
1925:
1924:
1883:
1880:
1860:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1854:
1853:
1852:
1851:
1850:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1727:
1726:
1725:
1724:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1679:
1678:
1658:
1657:
1656:
1655:
1637:
1636:
1635:
1634:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1614:
1613:
1612:
1611:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1558:
1555:
1543:122.62.226.243
1531:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1477:
1474:
1454:
1451:
1427:
1424:
1408:
1407:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1338:
1337:
1313:
1312:
1292:comment added
1272:
1271:
1250:comment added
1197:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1139:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1042:
1041:
1020:
1009:
1006:
990:
987:
954:
951:
927:
921:
920:
919:
885:
882:
840:
837:
835:
832:". Thank you.
821:
818:
795:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
698:(Delivered by
696:
638:
637:
636:
634:
631:
609:
579:
578:
577:
575:
572:
521:
518:
517:
516:
515:
514:
497:
496:
458:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
364:
361:
360:
359:
329:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
320:
294:128.103.236.60
283:
282:
281:
198:
195:
173:
170:
164:comment added
148:
147:
146:
145:
95:
92:
89:
88:
83:
79:
77:
74:
73:
72:
71:
66:
61:
56:
50:
44:
35:
34:
31:
30:
25:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2353:
2342:
2340:
2336:
2332:
2325:
2319:
2318:
2313:
2308:
2306:
2302:
2298:
2294:
2290:
2285:
2283:
2282:
2277:
2276:
2267:
2258:
2252:
2250:
2246:
2242:
2235:
2229:
2228:
2223:
2218:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2204:
2200:
2194:
2193:
2188:
2187:
2182:
2179:
2175:
2174:
2168:
2164:
2163:
2159:
2155:
2151:
2150:
2145:
2140:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2122:
2117:
2114:
2113:
2104:
2095:
2093:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2074:
2070:
2062:
2055:
2053:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2032:
2028:
2026:
2025:
2021:
2017:
2013:
2009:
2005:
2001:
1997:
1993:
1989:
1985:
1976:
1973:
1971:
1970:
1966:
1962:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1915:
1910:
1909:
1908:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1894:
1893:Many thanks,
1891:
1887:
1881:
1879:
1878:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1858:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1826:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1813:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1800:
1797:
1796:
1795:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1772:
1768:
1764:
1763:
1762:
1761:
1760:
1756:
1752:
1748:
1747:WP:LISTPEOPLE
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1735:
1734:WP:LISTPEOPLE
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1722:
1721:country lists
1718:
1717:
1716:
1715:
1709:
1705:
1700:
1696:
1695:
1694:
1693:
1687:
1686:wp:listpeople
1683:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1677:
1673:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1659:
1654:
1650:
1646:
1641:
1640:
1639:
1638:
1631:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1622:
1621:WP:LISTPEOPLE
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1609:
1605:
1600:
1599:
1598:
1597:
1591:
1590:
1589:
1585:
1581:
1576:
1575:
1574:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1557:Your blanking
1556:
1554:
1552:
1548:
1544:
1540:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1505:
1501:
1497:
1492:
1490:
1485:
1483:
1475:
1473:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1452:
1450:
1449:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1425:
1423:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1348:
1344:
1334:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1295:
1291:
1285:
1281:
1276:
1270:
1266:
1262:
1257:
1256:
1255:
1253:
1249:
1243:
1239:
1233:
1232:
1228:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1212:
1208:
1203:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1172:
1168:
1163:
1159:
1157:
1151:
1148:
1143:
1137:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1104:
1100:
1097:
1096:
1095:
1094:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1075:
1071:
1067:
1063:
1059:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1053:
1051:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1027:
1026:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1007:
1005:
1004:
1000:
996:
988:
986:
985:
982:
980:
975:
970:
964:
960:
952:
950:
949:
945:
941:
937:
936:independently
932:
925:
922:
917:
913:
909:
904:
903:
902:
900:
896:
892:
883:
881:
880:
876:
872:
868:
864:
861:
858:
854:
850:
846:
838:
836:
833:
831:
827:
819:
817:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
793:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
766:
765:
761:
757:
753:
750:
749:
748:
747:
743:
739:
735:
732:
728:
727:
723:
719:
715:
708:
705:
701:
695:
691:
687:
682:
680:
672:
668:
664:
659:
654:
650:
646:
642:
632:
628:
626:
622:
618:
614:
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
583:
573:
571:
570:
566:
562:
556:
552:
549:
546:
542:
538:
534:
530:
519:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:
499:
498:
495:
491:
487:
482:
481:
480:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
456:
448:
445:
442:
440:
439:
430:
429:
428:
424:
420:
415:
414:
413:
410:
407:
405:
404:
395:
394:
393:
392:
389:
386:
384:
383:
375:
370:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
345:
344:
343:
339:
335:
327:
319:
315:
311:
306:
305:
303:
299:
295:
291:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
263:
262:
261:
258:
256:
251:
249:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
222:
219:
217:
212:
210:
204:
196:
194:
193:
189:
185:
182:Best regards
180:
177:
169:
167:
163:
157:
153:
144:
140:
135:
131:
130:
129:
125:
121:
116:
115:
114:
112:
108:
103:
99:
93:
76:
75:
70:
67:
65:
62:
60:
57:
54:
51:
48:
45:
42:
41:2004 and 2005
39:
38:
37:
36:
33:
32:
28:
23:
18:
17:
2315:
2309:
2286:
2279:
2273:
2271:
2225:
2219:
2196:
2190:
2184:
2147:
2141:
2118:
2110:
2108:
2077:
2066:
2035:
1979:
1934:
1895:
1892:
1888:
1885:
1863:Please read
1862:
1828:
1824:
1816:
1803:Stuartyeates
1781:
1767:Stuartyeates
1707:
1698:
1560:
1537:— Preceding
1533:
1496:WilliamF1two
1493:
1489:this article
1486:
1482:this article
1479:
1463:Aaadddaaammm
1456:
1440:Jamesmcglinn
1436:Stuartyeates
1429:
1409:
1378:
1364:Stuartyeates
1339:
1332:
1314:
1277:
1273:
1234:
1219:my talk page
1215:edit summary
1199:
1164:
1160:
1152:
1144:
1141:
1102:
1079:
1049:
1045:
1030:
1029:
1023:
992:
978:
973:
968:
956:
935:
929:
887:
871:Stuartyeates
859:
853:Offender9000
848:
842:
834:
823:
807:Stuartyeates
797:
778:Stuartyeates
751:
738:Stuartyeates
729:
711:
704:on behalf of
700:MediationBot
683:
675:
655:, so please
644:
613:MediationBot
607:
602:
591:request page
561:Offender9000
557:
553:
550:
527:— Preceding
523:
468:
464:
460:
437:
436:
402:
401:
381:
380:
366:
331:
288:— Preceding
254:
247:
215:
208:
200:
181:
178:
175:
152:Vrjgriffiths
149:
107:Vrjgriffiths
104:
100:
97:
26:
2317:voting page
2227:voting page
2149:voting page
1886:Hey Simon,
1859:Harassment.
1699:never, ever
1606:" and are "
1288:—Preceding
1246:—Preceding
1221:. Thanks!
1205:Hello, I'm
1062:Bongwarrior
1025:In the news
995:Kai-Hendrik
959:WP:ROLLBACK
924:Pecha Kucha
363:New Zealand
334:Entropy1963
286:validity.
197:Flash drive
160:—Preceding
2301:topic bans
2211:topic bans
2133:topic bans
2078:discussion
2000:topic bans
1961:Ricky81682
1914:SimonLyall
1833:Epeefleche
1786:Epeefleche
1751:Epeefleche
1719:There are
1645:Epeefleche
1580:SimonLyall
1564:Epeefleche
1516:SimonLyall
1476:Spam Links
1432:Eventfinda
1397:SimonLyall
1360:SimonLyall
1302:SimonLyall
1261:SimonLyall
1182:SimonLyall
1107:SimonLyall
1008:ITN credit
756:SimonLyall
597:, and the
551:Hi Simon,
504:FancySkunk
486:SimonLyall
470:FancySkunk
419:SimonLyall
349:SimonLyall
310:SimonLyall
271:SimonLyall
232:SimonLyall
120:SimonLyall
98:Hi Simon,
2297:site bans
2207:site bans
2129:site bans
2029:March 5:
1996:site bans
1869:Salsakesh
1865:WP:OUTING
1633:criteria.
1453:Coastline
1434:article.
1362:on this.
1211:NZ On Air
1196:June 2013
1167:Robyn2000
1147:NZ On Air
1138:NZ On Air
1122:Yakushima
1085:Yakushima
940:Yakushima
884:Eden Park
803:WP:ATTACK
752:perpuates
718:Xavexgoem
587:Mediation
533:Pokeround
376:. Cheers
374:talk page
1945:deletion
1539:unsigned
1080:Re your
953:Rollback
863:contribs
686:WGFinley
541:contribs
529:unsigned
290:unsigned
255:Qwertyus
216:Qwertyus
27:Archives
2324:NoACEMM
2234:NoACEMM
1672:gadfium
1494:Thanks
1413:Nzindie
1381:Nzindie
1343:Nzindie
1318:Nzindie
1290:undated
1280:Nzindie
1248:undated
1238:Nzindie
849:conduct
647:by the
162:undated
139:gadfium
2043:Pharos
1986:. The
1688:issue.
1156:Hitler
1050:Ks0stm
961:valid
926:revert
663:Policy
621:behalf
593:, the
444:(talk)
409:(talk)
388:(talk)
248:Marcus
209:Marcus
184:Potzzz
150:Ok....
1825:don't
1336:(UTC)
908:Omahu
891:Omahu
869:. --
774:WP:RS
619:) on
369:WP:FA
2335:talk
2287:The
2245:talk
2197:The
2158:talk
2119:The
2087:talk
2047:talk
2020:talk
1965:talk
1918:talk
1902:talk
1873:talk
1837:talk
1829:they
1817:more
1807:talk
1790:talk
1771:talk
1755:talk
1708:Zero
1704:here
1649:talk
1584:talk
1568:talk
1547:talk
1520:talk
1500:talk
1467:talk
1459:here
1444:talk
1417:talk
1401:talk
1385:talk
1368:talk
1347:talk
1322:talk
1306:talk
1284:talk
1265:talk
1242:talk
1227:talk
1186:talk
1171:talk
1126:talk
1111:talk
1089:talk
1066:talk
999:talk
965:? --
963:here
944:talk
930:FYI.
912:talk
895:talk
875:talk
857:talk
811:talk
782:talk
760:talk
742:talk
733:and
722:talk
714:here
690:talk
639:The
617:talk
580:The
565:talk
537:talk
508:talk
490:talk
474:talk
438:corn
423:talk
403:corn
382:corn
353:talk
338:talk
314:talk
298:talk
275:talk
236:talk
188:talk
156:talk
124:talk
111:talk
69:2010
64:2009
59:2008
53:2007
47:2006
1980:Hi,
1898:Pjf
1782:not
1706:.
1333:all
1286:)
1244:)
1223:Ï¿½
1207:Ï¿½
851:of
658:add
434:AIR
399:AIR
378:AIR
267:car
158:)
2337:)
2326:}}
2322:{{
2299:,
2247:)
2236:}}
2232:{{
2209:,
2160:)
2152:.
2131:,
2089:)
2049:)
2041:--
2022:)
1998:,
1967:)
1920:)
1904:)
1896:—
1875:)
1839:)
1809:)
1792:)
1773:)
1757:)
1651:)
1586:)
1570:)
1549:)
1522:)
1502:)
1469:)
1446:)
1419:)
1403:)
1387:)
1370:)
1349:)
1324:)
1308:)
1267:)
1229:)
1188:)
1173:)
1128:)
1113:)
1101:.
1091:)
1068:)
1046:--
1001:)
946:)
914:)
901:)
897:)
877:)
843:A
813:)
805:.
784:)
776:.
762:)
744:)
724:)
702:,
692:)
673:.
601:,
567:)
543:)
539:•
510:)
492:)
476:)
425:)
355:)
340:)
316:)
300:)
277:)
238:)
205:.
190:)
136:.-
126:)
113:)
2333:(
2243:(
2156:(
2085:(
2045:(
2018:(
1963:(
1916:(
1900:(
1871:(
1835:(
1805:(
1788:(
1769:(
1753:(
1647:(
1602:"
1582:(
1566:(
1545:(
1518:(
1498:(
1465:(
1442:(
1415:(
1399:(
1383:(
1366:(
1345:(
1320:(
1304:(
1282:(
1263:(
1240:(
1225:(
1184:(
1169:(
1124:(
1109:(
1087:(
1064:(
1040:.
997:(
979:S
974:M
969:S
942:(
918:)
910:(
906:(
893:(
873:(
860:·
855:(
809:(
780:(
758:(
740:(
720:(
688:(
615:(
563:(
535:(
506:(
488:(
472:(
421:(
351:(
336:(
312:(
296:(
273:(
234:(
186:(
154:(
122:(
109:(
55:,
49:,
43:,
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
