Knowledge

User talk:SimonWright.au/Archives/2019

Source 📝

31: 537: 386: 599: 556:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 609:. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Knowledge's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Knowledge can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate 498:
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Simonwright. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Simonwright~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can
490:
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will
217:
Still, folks may well be on dicey Wikiepdia ground trying to say why WP is unique or it does things better than Forum x and it's not really what Knowledge is about. Does WP do things differently than 99% of forums out there? Most likely. Is that notable enough to be mentioned here? That's the thing,
108:
Re: talk pages. No, the user pages are the dumbest things here - the talk pages actually serve a proper purpose: communication. Yes, the threads here can be absurd in how they're fragmented. Usually, person A posts on B's talk page and B posts on A. Stupid? Absolutely - but it's how it's done 99% of
207:
The Soft Delete mod for phpBB 3.x essentially does the same thing, but allows the "soft deleted" post to remain in the forum viewable by superusers pretty much the way you do things at WP. You may've caught me out with IPB, but when I used the free iteration of it some years ago, you could delete a
152:
Pretty strong word to describe an internet forum, and probably one you'd have dramas proving. Not going to challenge it though - it's trivial. Just as an FYI, phpBB (with a mod) and vBulletin (and IPB etc) have functionality whereby you can tell if someone has edited and/or deleted a post. Anyhow,
363:
I have to ask where and how did you obtain an unmastered version of the song, since it is not supposed to be available to a general public. It's not that I'm not trying to say that your image is a fake, but the whole situation is still somewhat unrealistic. Please reply at my talk page. Thanks in
84:
I used were within the bounds of other uses of that template I have seen across wikipedia, so as far as I'm concerned, the original sizes already satisfied "policy". ... Also, the talk pages have to be the dumbest part of Knowledge. Sure, if you use the site frequently, they might make some weird
281:
That was a REALLY good observation on your part, and you're right when you say it was notable that the producers allowed such a goof to occur. Idk how I could fit it in on the main article, but it would be worthwhile, perhaps. Now I have to watch these episodes again. I should include that in
277:
Hey, sorry for appearing hostile in my reply to your post on the Top Chef Chicago talk page. I think I was a bit irate, because I had not seen the chart at the top and just scrolled to the bottom to see if anyone new replied to my IN +/- explanation...but I digress.
85:
kind of sense. But do I reply to you on your talk page (as you have done, therefore breaking up the conversation in the oddest possible way) or do I reply underneath your comment (as I'm doing now) where I have no idea if you're going to be alerted or not...?--
168:
Really? I have a couple of friends who run forums, one is phpbb and the other is IPB and they really want to add the type of transparent moderation which Whirlpool has implemented. If you could let me know where to find these mods I'd greatly appreciate
64:
OK, 200px sounds reasonable. And you aren't doing it to satisfy me dude, you're doing to satisfy the x amount of policies and guidelines that determine how Knowledge is run. BTW, why blank your talk page? How else are people supposed to reply to you?
246:
Some forums/plugins have started adding deletion pointers, but I've yet to see the feature implemented quite as completely as we have. I really don't think plug-ins could ever quite implement such a necessarily core feature very
175:
It's also worth noting that the specific lack of a feature is a "feature" that many packages lack. For example, the ability for moderators to edit posts -- Whirlpool does not have that "feature", which is itself a feature.
102:
is all the rage around here, I changed it to something I deemed more appropriate. The size you have them at now seems to be OK. But, don't be surprised if someone changes them. Such is the nature of Knowledge.
491:
help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See
80:
There are no specific policies about image sizes that I can find -- and if there are, they're certainly not applied very well. And they certainly don't specify postage stamp sizes as you decided. The
492: 332:, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Knowledge. 105:
The policies and guidelines I was harping on about are generally the ones concerning advertising, conflicts of interest (you are Whirlpool's principal after all) and the like.
633:- just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well. 208:
post and it'd leave a pointer in the thread saying why it was deleted. I'm assuming the modern pay-for version of IPB has something similar. You'd hope so, anyway.
510:
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
198:
is a vBulletin forum that shows if posts have been deleted and/or edited. Having never run a VB site, I don't know whether that's included or its a plug-in/mod.
413:
if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see
630: 606: 592: 409:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 251: 568: 98:
No, you're spot on. They're not applied very well. Still, when I first saw the Whirlpool stuff, in my mind they looked a touch big and since
656: 336: 325: 301: 321: 645: 613:, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like 548: 552:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 500: 401:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 640: 557: 414: 397: 329: 317: 38: 344: 172:
I'm quite sure vBulletin hasn't implemented anything similar, at least last time I checked (about 6-9 months ago)
47: 17: 503:. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit 258: 181: 135: 90: 297: 223: 158: 117: 70: 243:
I can't find any deleted posts on the milphotos site. I'm quite sure it's not part of vBulletin though.
254: 177: 131: 86: 504: 340: 289: 219: 154: 113: 66: 663: 580: 476: 373: 348: 305: 262: 227: 185: 162: 139: 121: 74: 576: 472: 459: 320:. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Knowledge uses a set of 293: 616: 518: 406: 385: 369: 455: 324:
to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from
660: 652: 410: 99: 624: 610: 427: 335:
For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on
433:
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
572: 553: 468: 402: 195: 365: 360: 46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
659:. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. -- 507:
to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
598: 283: 112:
As for being alerted, I've added this talk page to my watchlist.
636:
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
440:
the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click
25: 454:
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off
597: 535: 384: 430:, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. 530:
Orphaned non-free image File:Whirlpoollogo-2008-april.png
441: 567:
will be deleted after seven days, as described in the
240:
Ahh yes, but the article doesn't say "unique" does it.
379:
Orphaned non-free image File:Whirlpool-2008-april.png
361:http://en.wikipedia.org/File:Otherside-graphic.png 153:the sources look cool and I've taken the tag off. 312:License tagging for File:Whirlpool-2008-april.png 655:. For assistance on the image use policy, see 629:(to require that you be credited), or any tag 563:Note that any non-free images not used in any 8: 607:File:Macintosh-through-the-looking-glass.png 593:File:Macintosh-through-the-looking-glass.png 522:Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 130:Thanks for the reply. Well received. -- 447:To opt out of these bot messages, add 44:Do not edit the contents of this page. 339:. Thank you for your cooperation. -- 7: 657:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 337:Knowledge:Media copyright questions 485: 405:. However, the image is currently 24: 549:File:Whirlpoollogo-2008-april.png 29: 651:This is an automated notice by 591:Unspecified source/license for 194:To name a vBulletin example - 1: 664:13:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC) 646:Knowledge:File copyright tags 558:our policy for non-free media 513:Sorry for the inconvenience. 444:to file an un-delete request. 415:our policy for non-free media 398:File:Whirlpool-2008-april.png 349:03:06, 31 December 2008 (UTC) 318:File:Whirlpool-2008-april.png 569:criteria for speedy deletion 482:Your account will be renamed 93:) 06:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 526:02:59, 20 March 2015 (UTC) 436:If you receive this notice 679: 641:Knowledge:Image use policy 581:16:40, 12 April 2015 (UTC) 306:14:57, 11 April 2008 (UTC) 621:(to release all rights), 536: 501:pick out a different name 263:08:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 228:07:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 186:07:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 163:06:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC) 140:15:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 122:08:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 75:05:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC) 477:05:30, 4 June 2010 (UTC) 374:00:47, 2 June 2010 (UTC) 18:User talk:SimonWright.au 458:and leave a message on 602: 541: 495:for more information. 390: 95: 605:Thanks for uploading 601: 586:Image without license 546:Thanks for uploading 539: 449:{{bots|deny=DASHBot}} 395:Thanks for uploading 388: 316:Thanks for uploading 78: 60:Image sizes/Whirlpool 42:of past discussions. 505:Special:MergeAccount 460:my owner's talk page 322:image copyright tags 411:You may add it back 603: 542: 451:to your talk page. 391: 554:claim of fair use 403:claim of fair use 308: 292:comment added by 54: 53: 48:current talk page 670: 628: 620: 544: 538: 519:Keegan Peterzell 493:the announcement 450: 393: 287: 33: 32: 26: 678: 677: 673: 672: 671: 669: 668: 667: 627:|cc-by-sa-4.0}} 622: 614: 596: 588: 533: 532: 524: 484: 448: 382: 381: 357: 341:ImageTaggingBot 314: 275: 150: 62: 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 676: 674: 649: 648: 643: 595: 589: 587: 584: 531: 528: 521: 517: 483: 480: 466: 464: 463: 452: 445: 434: 431: 380: 377: 356: 352: 313: 310: 274: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 265: 248: 244: 241: 233: 232: 231: 230: 212: 211: 210: 209: 202: 201: 200: 199: 189: 188: 173: 170: 149: 146: 145: 144: 143: 142: 125: 124: 110: 106: 103: 82:original sizes 61: 58: 56: 52: 51: 34: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 675: 666: 665: 662: 658: 654: 647: 644: 642: 639: 638: 637: 634: 632: 626: 618: 612: 611:copyright tag 608: 600: 594: 590: 585: 583: 582: 578: 574: 571:. Thank you. 570: 566: 561: 559: 555: 551: 550: 543: 529: 527: 523: 520: 514: 511: 508: 506: 502: 496: 494: 488: 481: 479: 478: 474: 470: 461: 457: 453: 446: 443: 439: 435: 432: 429: 425: 424: 423: 422: 418: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 399: 392: 387: 378: 376: 375: 371: 367: 362: 359:In regard to 354: 353: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 331: 327: 323: 319: 311: 309: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 285: 279: 272: 264: 260: 256: 252: 249: 245: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 235: 234: 229: 225: 221: 216: 215: 214: 213: 206: 205: 204: 203: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 187: 183: 179: 174: 171: 167: 166: 165: 164: 160: 156: 147: 141: 137: 133: 129: 128: 127: 126: 123: 119: 115: 111: 107: 104: 101: 97: 96: 94: 92: 88: 83: 77: 76: 72: 68: 59: 57: 49: 45: 41: 40: 35: 28: 27: 19: 650: 635: 604: 564: 562: 547: 545: 534: 525: 515: 512: 509: 497: 489: 486: 467:Thank you. 465: 437: 421:PLEASE NOTE: 420: 419: 396: 394: 383: 358: 334: 315: 294:Cinemaniac86 286:, even =P. 280: 276: 255:Simon Wright 178:Simon Wright 151: 132:Simon Wright 87:Simon Wright 81: 79: 63: 55: 43: 37: 328:, click on 288:—Preceding 36:This is an 218:isn't it? 100:being bold 661:MifterBot 653:MifterBot 364:advance. 330:this link 326:this list 284:my recaps 273:Top Chef. 220:Peter1968 196:Milphotos 155:Peter1968 114:Peter1968 109:the time. 67:Peter1968 565:articles 407:orphaned 302:contribs 290:unsigned 617:PD-self 573:Stefan2 487:Hello, 469:DASHBot 426:I am a 148:Unique? 39:archive 516:Yours, 366:Netrat 438:after 247:well. 16:< 631:here 625:self 577:talk 473:talk 456:here 442:here 370:talk 345:talk 298:talk 259:talk 250:e.g 224:talk 182:talk 159:talk 136:talk 118:talk 91:talk 71:talk 560:). 428:bot 417:). 169:it. 623:{{ 619:}} 615:{{ 579:) 475:) 372:) 347:) 304:) 300:• 261:) 253:-- 226:) 184:) 176:-- 161:) 138:) 120:) 73:) 575:( 540:⚠ 471:( 462:. 389:⚠ 368:( 355:] 343:( 296:( 257:( 222:( 180:( 157:( 134:( 116:( 89:( 69:( 50:.

Index

User talk:SimonWright.au
archive
current talk page
Peter1968
talk
05:45, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Simon Wright
talk
being bold
Peter1968
talk
08:57, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Simon Wright
talk
15:35, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
Peter1968
talk
06:56, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Simon Wright
talk
07:08, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
Milphotos
Peter1968
talk
07:49, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Simon Wright
talk
08:45, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
my recaps

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.