User talk:Soltesh - Knowledge (XXG)

1975:, and i didn't know the reason why it was deleted, i wrote about the company and it was approved and i was compensated for it, later on the article was deleted for being similar with a previously deleted one (which i had no idea about), the second was about an entrepreneur i told him he failed Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines for notability, and he only requested i just helped him draft the article, which i did and he also compensated me, surprisingly another editor took the subject from my page re-edited and got it approved as a stub. Outside this, i have always contributed to entertainments/fashion related subjects that i find interest in, and i usually double check for fact and news sources before editing, most times i ask for help from more experienced editors if i can go ahead and submit for review. Basically this are my positions, and i have said nothing but the truth, if Knowledge (XXG) does not allow compensation, then i'd stop accepting one. Hence at this point i'd like to appeal again that my account is reconsidered and allowed to contribute on Knowledge (XXG) again, having maintained calm and patience for the waited time of since months to re-appeal again. - Accept my highest regards! 1000:

doesn’t know what next todo she disclosed her login details to me (I authoritative denied are request but later accepted and I mentioned I could spear her just 10 mins of my time to speak to the deleting admin) after which she should change her password. 2. The second being a new draft article which was made on her user space and she needed help moving to main space draft, I also help her doing that from my own account, she further requested for review and I specifically told her I can only proof read, make corrections but I do not have the nessesary rights to review or accept an article, and for now I’m only working on AFD’s, as I simply asked another editor who is a member of the Nigerian WikiProject to further help her, hence it’s also a Nigeria related article. However I accept my mistakes and i effusively apologize again that such won’t be done again as my account is over 6 years old and I have never violated any Knowledge (XXG) guidelines for Editors, I’d appreciate if my account can be restored back to normal. Thanks.

1971:, I'd be truthful about this account, honestly i had no intention on using this account for any reason that would result to problems on the encyclopedia, I only created the account just so i use it to contribute as well, if i knew Knowledge (XXG) does not permits running two accounts, i wouldn't have created one. This is the reason why its difficult for me to explain why i created the account as i don't even know what to say, i can only admit i created the account with the intention to run to accounts, and i deeply apologies for the confusion last here. Secondly, the question of being a paid contributor or not, On two occasions i have been offered money to write, the first being for a page i never knew was deleted some years back, as at the time i checked the subjected matter was notable 1383:

Knowledge (XXG) community guidelines I will never use multiple account on the community again. Have learnt my lessons and I can assure you this won’t happen again.” And I clearly stated that I have never broken any Knowledge (XXG) community guideline with my 6 years of using the platform, either on the articles I created which I wrote from a neutral point of view being a writer or the times I have contributed to Nigerian Entertainment related articles that have either been created and I helped in fixing dead links or typos on them or my contributions on AFD’s, again I’d like to appeal effusively that cautions have been taken and my account be unblocked. Thanks!

2265:

article I wrote on my name and I used the account to request help on mine just so it looks a legit, and am really really sorry about my actions, I suffered the consequence of being suspended for more than a year now. 2. Secondly, the question of if am a paid write, the answer is No. And the other if am offered payment to write an article, in this case, with what I have been through am not sure I want to be involved with that or anything that will cost me my account again if am unsuspended. Please this is coming from my heart, I really do not know how to appeal enough, kindly forgive my actions I beg of you. - Thanks!

2068:

about that account, you have not been. You also need to be much clearer about if you intend to accept payment in future for writing an article, and what you would do if you were offered payment. I have linked you to the guideline about paid writing, please read it rather than saying "if Knowledge (XXG) does not allow compensation, then i'd stop accepting one". We have guidelines on how to edit Knowledge (XXG). It really helps if you read and follow them. Especially when they have been pointed out to you.

1555:

are mainly you creating pages that were not deemed suitable for Knowledge (XXG). Third, your comment about creating a new account is a threat to continue socking; that alone is unacceptable. Finally, you accuse people of "bias", which is not conducive to collaborating appropriately in this environment. I suggest you get on with your life as you previously considered doing and forget about editing at Knowledge (XXG); it apparently isn't a venue that is good for you or for the project.--

2348: 126: 303: 2179: 1873: 1293: 1059: 909: 401: 1533:

sincerely from the uprightness of my heart that such wont happen again, please be considerate and tender your resolve with mercy, I recently joined the Nigeria’s WikiProject which I was invited to and I do not know about any syndicate performing such action, we should also understand that we have few service providers in Nigeria and IP probably might be same for some number of users.

834: 1857:. You'll note that if you are being paid, that does not prohibit you from editing Knowledge (XXG) as long as you make it clear that you are being paid. But if you are being paid, and you don't tell us, and then we find out, we will block you. The more time you spend on your appeal, the more detailed and honest you are, the more likely it is you will be unblocked. Good luck! 2365:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge (XXG). If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (XXG) (see 191: 2133:, Thanks for taking out time to review, there was no specific place on my last appeal which i just did after the wait period of 6 months i denied any of this, in good faith i admitted all wrongs and i asked to be forgiven for the sake of moving on and nothing such action would never occur again. I have clarified all this to 1667:. The more open and honest you are, the more likely it is that the community will let you back in; but bear in mind that the community do take a very dim view of paid contributors who have edited without disclosing, have operated sock accounts, and have lied about it. You will need to be very open and honest to get back in. 1659:

all of us. At this point you have lost our trust. We will not consider any more appeals at the moment because we cannot trust what you say. Integrity is required to edit Knowledge (XXG). The route open to you now is our "Standard offer". Wait six months, and make another appeal along the lines outlined in

2005:

give the appearance of trying to appear as two different people. I have more than one account and we don't talk to each other. Previously, you have denied operating two accounts, and according to your talk page, you concocted some concoction about one giving the other a password, on here and on IRC.

1554:

Based on your comments, I'm unwilling to unblock you. First, you haven't been editing for six years on Knowledge (XXG) with this account - more like 4.5 years. Second, in that time, you have a grand total of 261 live edits, of which only 157 are to article space. You also have 88 deleted edits, which

1261:

usually I correct typos on existing articles, i fix dead links and I also contribute on the AFD’s that concerns Nigerian related articles, sometimes Entertainment related ones, I also assist new Nigerian users to fact check and proof read their first articles on the encyclopedia before asking them to

2553:

It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in

1382:

response on my last request for unblock on how I have resolved the said issue and what steps have I taken for such not to happen again, I have responded on my talk page and he seem to be offline. This was my response: “Have decided to take cautions on the Request for assistance I’d be rendering, per

1144:

Hi again, sorry i had to clarify the entire situation and if it’s not clear enough to explain the technical abuse, in summary of what I said earlier, I want to again state that the two accounts where accessed from the same IP which resulted to the technical abuse, I have resolved the said issue, and

999:

and later deleted today as it is similar to the last version which was deleted, I asked for her to explain what she knows about the previous which she even clarified as the new version she wrote without knowing about the old one was done through assistance on the Knowledge (XXG) live help, hence she

2264:

Have stayed clear from wikipedia for more than a year now and I thought I should give it a shot again if my appeal will be considered this time. 1. Being the issue of the account Kareemahr I have repeatedly said I had no intentions what so ever to use the account as a suck puppet, I didn't want the

1574:

Firstly I never accused anyone of being biased, it was a lite statement out of frustration. 2. Secondly I never threatened to create another account, I only said if I had never wanted to appeal and create another account I’d have done so, I didn’t consider that option. 3. I don’t see how someone in

2086:

In the issue of payments, I have read the guidelines, and just so I don't get my self into all this again I do not wish to accept payment to write any article again. The stress my last actions has gotten me into, I do not wish to go another round again. I'm deeply sorry for my actions, and my only

2067:

in which you have one account talking to another, asking for help, and why you claimed in your initial unblock request that Kareemarh was a new female editor you were trying to help. If I was to review your request I would decline it as, despite my explaining that you needed to be honest and clear

1658:

Sometimes people make a mistake. Provided they are open and honest, we are often willing to give people a second chance. You have made three appeals in which you have attempted to deceive us. Four experienced Knowledge (XXG) admins have looked into your situation, and you have attempted to mislead

452:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

2399:

Greetings & a great weekend to you all. I believe it would be great if the (Requests for uncreated articles) section in our wiki project can be attended to & at least one article be created this weekend as some requests have been pending since 2016. I believe this would be pivotal to the

1643:

There's nothing more to say, hence I have been appealing please I’d like to request another chance and I promise such won’t happen again. Please give me the benefit of doubts and allow me indulge you, kindly unblock my account. If there’s anything else you’d like me todo, let me know. Thanks -

2112:

I note the ping, but you'll need to wait for another admin to look into this as I was the one to decline you last time, and I would be inclined to decline again. I hope things go well for you whatever happens. I have put in a new section heading to avoid confusion with your request last year.

2082:

As I earlier said, I created the account. I did it for someone who needed my help, but I wasn't interested in the subject matter so I never wanted to use my account in creating the page, however it got to some point I needed to use my account to make changes to the page so I made it look like

1532:

I hav never been paid for editing since I start editing on the encyclopedia, my case here is particularly different, I have admitted to editing with the other said user account per request from the user, I have clearly stated repeatedly that such would never happen again, please I’m appealing

1402:

Your explanation doesn't match the checkuser evidence. If two different people used the Kareemarh account, we would have different signs, but we don't. Only one person has used the Kareemarh account, and that person is the same person who used the Soltesh account.

2763: 2654: 2537: 2428: 1457:

requested help with an article that got speedied, and gave her login credentials to Soltesh over IRC. Soltesh then used her account to leave talk page messages for the deleting admin and other editors involved. This is a pretty clear violation of

994:

Hi, I think I have probably crossed the lines and I apologize, am a member of the Nigerian WikiProject and the said new user Kareemarh ask for my help today for two things, 1. One being are recently created article which was accepted into the AFC

514: 152:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1670:

I must stress that there is no point in appealing any more at this point, and if you make another appeal, it is likely that your talkpage access will be removed. You have taken up enough of people's time as it is. Try again in six months.

1217:

Have decided to take cautions on the Request for assistance I’d be rendering, per Knowledge (XXG) community guidelines I will never use multiple account on the community again. Have learnt my lessons and I can assure you this won’t happen

2677:

of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.

2501:

We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page

1145:

am sure such won’t happen again. I hope this explains better (as I’m also finding it difficult to understand the word “technical abuse” do forgive my ignorance on this) and I look forward to your favorable response with many thanks.

2063:

I note the ping. As I declined you six months ago I will leave this request for another admin to look into. I will say, though, that your explanation of the use of the Kareemarh account is inadequate. You would need to explain this

441:. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time. 2788: 2566: 1575:

my position won’t be as frustrated as this, it’s been over two weeks I have been appealing and no one was talking to me, I’d appreciate if you’d reconsider your decision and forgive my ignorance if you got my message the wrong way.

726:

Hi Soltesh. Thank you for your contributions to AFD discussions. I just want to let you know that I find your deliberate method of allowing bots to sign your posts quite unique, but also confusing. Keep up the good work! Regards.

2141:

on this appeal thread. Now it seems forgiveness here is a bit difficult, i don't know what else to say or do. Again, i'm tendering my unreserved apology and i'd appreciate if your last conclusion could be reconsidered again.

2616:

We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!

156:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

1958:

Hi, thanks for the opportunity to appeal again after the 6 months suspension. I'd like to apologies for whatever troubles my actions might have caused and i want to also use this medium to address the two issues

2311:

I see you were warned, by SilkTork above, that any further lying would extend the period for your next appeal to one year. I follow that advice. I suggest you are not eligible to apply again until 2021-01-16.

1852:

account. Be very clear about the reason why you are creating new articles. If you are being paid, then read this carefully word for word, at least twice, and make notes regarding the bits that relate to you:

2291:

is public, right? And it shows you last edited with this account in July of 2019? Given the previous concerns around lying, this is a terrible sign. I suggest this resets the timer. You may apply under

499: 1509:

I concur. I have reason to be somewhat suspicious of multiple accounts editing from this location, since I know of at least one paid editing ring operating multiple accounts from this user's area.

212: 2784: 2777: 2776:

achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please

2773: 2729: 2728:

Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page

2674: 2667: 2562: 2555: 2547: 2503: 2448: 2441: 1603:

I have retracted my previous comment, I said it was due to some sort of frustration and I sincerely apologize over my previous comment, I’d gladly appreciate your reconsideration based on

1579:

What I think was the most important was that I admitted to my wrong and I apologized, I still kept on appealing even right now as am typing this. I apologize whole heartedly. - Thanks!

550: 2160:

You may appeal again in six months. In order for that appeal to succeed you need to be completely honest. If you lie again we may extend the period for your next appeal to one year.

2670:

Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Knowledge (XXG)!

509:

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See

513:

for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Knowledge (XXG), but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask

1848:. Tell the truth. Do not attempt to lie. If you lie we cannot trust you. Knowledge (XXG) runs on trust. If you lie you will not be unblocked. Be completely honest about the 1484:

What are your thoughts? One problem I have with the user's explanation is they were not just editing from the same IP. They appear to have been using the same device.--

539:

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see

506:

and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

1462:, but not sockpuppetry per se. Moreover, I'm not seeing the actual harm done here. Seems like a productive editor who made a mistake and has acknowledged it. -- 149: 2335:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2052:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1437:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1203:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1045:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

2296:

no sooner than six months from today. At that point, I suggest being fully, completely honest with us. For the record, six months from today is 2020-07-16.

138: 758:

Please I'm also contributing to Nigerian related articles on the encyclopedia i need help moving a new article from "User Space" to "Main Space". Here -

2377: 1854: 1664: 870: 390: 366: 560: 38: 589: 62: 2732:. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.-- 2506:. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.-- 69: 2565:' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the 2320: 2037: 1845: 1422: 1188: 1030: 877: 2411: 2219: 1913: 1333: 1099: 949: 782:

per your request have moved your articled to the Main Space Draft, another editor/admin will help you confirm it as a Nigeria related stub.

2447:

Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly

707:

I missed your enquiry. Anyone can review articles. Try copy editting a few dozen. You can also give constructive criticism on talk pages.

681:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Knowledge (XXG)'s 1716:

If 6 months is the ultimate price to pay for all the troubles I must have caused, I’m willing to pay it. Thanks for throwing more lights

503: 457:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 438: 370: 226: 178: 2797:

the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.

2663: 2437: 1844:

Yes, you can. Now listen carefully - read this word for word at least twice, make notes of the important bits that relate to you:

2400:

encyclopedia as a whole & a means to get editors who have gone inactive to revive their Knowledge (XXG) activities. Sent by

1706:

I’m deeply sorry for all the inconveniences caused, It was just that what I do during my leisure lately was taken away from me.

574: 222: 52: 2407: 2357: 579: 524:

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately

410: 57: 2361:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge (XXG) under a 533: 358: 314: 2288: 2214: 1908: 1515: 1328: 1248: 1173: 1094: 944: 22: 2366: 821: 772: 454: 434: 362: 2787:' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the 2192: 1886: 1306: 1072: 922: 847: 842: 795: 529: 525: 142: 2186: 1880: 1660: 1300: 1066: 916: 583: 417: 2191:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1885:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1305:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1071:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

921:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

536:

or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

863: 856: 852: 1663:. We would expect you to explain why you created two accounts, and to declare if you are a paid contributor per 555: 518: 43: 29: 2866: 2748: 2639: 2522: 1262:

go ahead with their submissions to the AFC that is if they meet WP Basic requirements to ascertain notability.

596: 2023: 674: 600: 76: 2852: 2737: 2625: 2511: 1467: 632: 616: 1459: 612: 374: 276:

Per your request I have restored the article and moved it to your userspace, you can find the article at

88: 2233: 1927: 1347: 1113: 963: 732: 712: 604: 80: 2019: 565: 25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: 510: 208: 158: 106: 92: 33: 327:

While all constructive contributions to Knowledge (XXG) are appreciated, content or articles may be

817: 768: 650: 642: 480: 285: 654: 495: 2865:

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from

2747:Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from 2638:

You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from

2521:Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from 2165: 2118: 2073: 1862: 1790: 1676: 1408: 277: 264: 611:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 1972: 449: 426: 394: 87:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 2848: 2733: 2621: 2507: 2287:

Your very first sentence in this unblock request is a clear and verifiable lie. You know your

1606: 1513: 1463: 1246: 1171: 628: 433:, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a 341: 322:

There is no way a person born today can be notable and/or be a television presenter and model.

540: 464: 2329: 2046: 1431: 1197: 1039: 883: 728: 708: 345: 101:

to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

2015: 2011: 686: 682: 430: 328: 2385: 2301: 1560: 1489: 1011:

None of this explains how there is technical evidence for the abuse of multiple accounts.

897: 197: 182: 102: 2362: 2293: 668: 662: 658: 1272:

Hence my contributions are always Entertainment related, same as most of my assistance.

429:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1968: 1849: 1016: 813: 779: 764: 468: 281: 245: 72:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge (XXG). 2161: 2136: 2114: 2090: 2069: 1962: 1858: 1816: 1786: 1759: 1719: 1701: 1672: 1638: 1404: 380: 257: 2762: 2653: 2536: 2427: 2266: 2197: 2143: 2095: 1976: 1891: 1822: 1765: 1736: 1645: 1618: 1580: 1540: 1527: 1510: 1479: 1384: 1379: 1311: 1273: 1258: 1243: 1224: 1214: 1168: 1146: 1077: 927: 804: 787: 748: 570: 48: 218: 2772:

It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the

225:, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to 759: 690: 453:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

310: 296: 133: 117: 2381: 2297: 1727: 1598: 1571: 1556: 1504: 1485: 1446: 996: 893: 351:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing

2083:

Kareemarh was asking for editorial help, and I sincerely apologies for this.

1012: 1732:

sorry for the way I also did spoke to you, do accept my sincerest apology.

833: 502:. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a 2561:

Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the

530:

usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation

2783:

Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the

2550:

global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.

876:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

409:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

880:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 2761: 2652: 2569:

page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

2535: 2426: 1785:

No. It has not been six months. You can appeal again after June 21st.

444:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

217:

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to

653:, does not have enough sources and citations as written to establish 498:, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a 2856: 2681:

The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:

2629: 2415: 2402: 2389: 2305: 2274: 2169: 2151: 2122: 2103: 2077: 2027: 1984: 1866: 1830: 1794: 1773: 1744: 1680: 1653: 1626: 1588: 1564: 1548: 1520: 1493: 1471: 1412: 1281: 1253: 1232: 1178: 1154: 1020: 901: 736: 716: 697: 636: 484: 384: 289: 266: 190: 171: 110: 685:

and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the

244:

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider

608: 84: 1821:, Trust you are good? Should i go ahead and appeal again? thanks 1451:

Would you mind reviewing this block? If I'm following correctly,

1167:

How have you resolved the said issue? Why won't it happen again?

200:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 2800:

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

2454:

We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:

2343:

Orphaned non-free image File:9janimi Channel New Logo (2014).png

2130: 1453: 21:

Hello, Soltesh, and welcome to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for

2444:

about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.

2620:

Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --

2451:

to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.

2346: 2177: 1871: 1391:) 8:43 am, 5 December 2018, Wednesday (15 days ago) (UTC+0) 1291: 1057: 907: 832: 459: 399: 301: 189: 2756:

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

2530:

The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!

528:. Knowledge (XXG) generally does not allow editors to have 1764:, it's been 6 months, can i re-appeal again now? Thanks - 869:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans 463:, or if you have already done so, you can place a request 137:

is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to

2317:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

2034:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1419:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1185:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

1027:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

233:

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the

2440:

invites you to join us again this October and November,

2337:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2054:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1439:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1205:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

1047:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

494:

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was

2647:

Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!

2442:

the two months which are dedicated to improving content

2247: 2243: 2237: 2228: 2224: 2210: 2206: 2202: 2065: 2002: 1998: 1941: 1937: 1931: 1922: 1918: 1904: 1900: 1896: 1361: 1357: 1351: 1342: 1338: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1127: 1123: 1117: 1108: 1104: 1090: 1086: 1082: 977: 973: 967: 958: 954: 940: 936: 932: 369:

process can result in deletion without discussion, and

246: 236: 131:

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

97: 2847:

Thank you once again for your valued participation! --

334:

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the

221:. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can 2791:. Please note that your articles must be present in 2185: