394:
what I'm writing cannot be substantiated by Chris
Randall himself. I know why he never mentioned me as a member of the band, but I'll save that story (which could be absolutely substatiated) perhaps for an interview, phone call, letter, essay,etc.... Here is only the facts. No grudge or sour grapes from my part. I understand you wish not to post this contribution to your work, but the facts are here and it is all true. I would never take the time to write all of this if it these events were not the truth. Perhaps a newspaper article or show listing would help? I don't know.....I know Sister Machine Gun is not this huge success that I should get so interested to take part of its history and get my 2 minutes of fame. It's not that. Just report the facts as it was seen by people and not only by what was written. History will not change for those who were there......for they saw and knew that Sister Machine Gun started as Chris Randall and Guilherme (Bill). That will not change and if it is not reported in your piece, then this entry of Sister machine Gun is not accurate. I was just trying to make it detailed and accurate. Thank you for the opportunity. Marcondes
390:
Limelight and at the
Pipeline in Newark NJ. Sasha from KMFDM heard our sound and became interested and thought we could get signed to a label. Sasha offered a job as a roadie to Randall For KMFDM's tour. That'a how Randall ended up in Chicago. Sasha lived there and Wax Trax was there. I joined Randall in Chicago in August 1991 to record the demo at Chicago Trax. This demo, which was presented to Wax Trax, had Sasha as the producer and contribution from Jim Marcus, Al Jourgensen and Sasha himself. I played guitar on all the tracks. In September and October we were recording the album "Sins of the Flesh". I quit Sister Machine Gun the following year. The name of the band came directly from Skinny Puppy's "Tin Omen", Chris asked what I thought of it and did not really cared, for I just wanted to play.
227:
703:
610:
851:
801:
574:
band ... until I decided to do the search for it, and to my amusement find out that Bill had basically been "erased" from the history of the band. I am glad that Chris decided to confirm Bill's part in the band ... I'm not sure he would've answered any of our e-mails. Deep down all I wanted was to make the article historically accurate. ] (
573:
You are right, the article needs to meet encyclopedia standards and yes maybe the quote "people step on people" comment was over the top. Please understand that I only recently started using
Knowledge (XXG) and also that the SMG chapter in my life as well as Bill's was closed ever since Bill left the
555:
In the coming days, I will clean up the article to better conform to encyclopedia standards. In the meantime, if you're so sure that what you have to add is important, get to work on finding some verifiable sources to support your information. This is not a place for you and your buddy Bill to air
527:
Why would the band name origin need to be fraudulently spread around by publicists? Did or does Sister
Machine Gun even have publicists? It's not like they were ever a huge national act. Most people still believe that the Tin Omen origin is true, which is why I added the correction to the article
432:
No, I am not a reporter. I am a fan of SMG, and a
Knowledge (XXG) user, and I want to make sure that the article is factual and informative. I am not solely responsible for this article. It's the nature of Knowledge (XXG) that anyone can edit any article, and claim anything they want (as you have
586:
I've cleaned up the article a bit. Bill is mentioned as a member, but anything non-neutral and/or inflammatory has been removed. I've been in correspondence with Chris
Randall, and we're going to work on making the article much more complete and informative. Some details will probably be glossed
515:
If you're going to make something encyclpaedic, it needs to have sources other than "Some guy told me so, it's the truth". Why does the information that you are insisting is truth matter? What matters is facts about the band. What you're posting sounds like some sort of petty grudge from someone
389:
Hi Sovex. Are you a reporter or journalist? The facts are that I was the lead guitarist of Sister
Machine Gun which started 17 years ago in Soho New york (rehearsal studio building basement at Wooster street). The band was initially Chris Randall and myself Bill (Guilherme). We played at New York's
498:
I am not trying to cause trouble. I am trying to place the truth in the article. If one knows that the sources are mistaken can one prove them wrong with photos and /or archive footage? Once an erroneous piece of information is spread as gospel, how can one undo the damage? Do you have any advice?
393:
Can all of this be verified and supported? Yes. I have plenty of photos, the demo and plenty of witnesses who could confirm all of this. I know I'm not cited anywhere as member of Sister
Machine Gun, but it does not mean that my contribution to Sister Machine Gun was insignificant. Or perhaps that
521:
Who is Bill
Machado? He's not credited on any albums. He has no writing credits. Plenty of bands have insignificant members before making it. Why does he matter? What did he contribute that made such a huge impact? He happened to be around when a band started 16-17 years ago? That's hugely
130:
Unfortunately, I did not see this before the article was deleted. If it is possible to un-delete it, I feel this step should be taken. I don't understand why C-tec would not be considered notable enough to have their own article. They fall well within the bounds of importance, as defined by
450:
In concession to you, when I clean up the article later, I will remove the information that could be deemed as hearsay, but I will keep your name in the "former members" section. However, I will add a tag to your name that citation and proof are needed to keep it there. I'm not trying to be
478:
Bill, I have recieved confirmation from Chris
Randall that you were indeed a member. I apologize for making this into such an issue. The information was simply not available to me or the general public. I will still be cleaning up the article later, because it's in bad shape, and needs
549:
I could keep going, but I think I've pretty much made my point. Knowledge (XXG) is for information, not speculation. What you insist is important isn't, until it's proven so. Until you can provide concrete proof that your information NEEDS to be a part of the article, please leave it
444:
It still sounds like sour grapes, and Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to claim your "2 minutes of fame". When you make claims like this, but say "I don't have any immediate proof, and the founder of the band will claim it's untrue", it sounds a whole lot like "I am making things
533:
While we're playing the "he told me so" game, I got the information from Chris Randall himself at a show in 02. No "publicists". Sorry, but I will trust someone who has been solely responsible for the success of a band for it's entire duration than someone who left in its early
143:, both of whom are unarguably notable. If it is not too late, this deletion should surely be reconsidered, and I do not think that it should be deleted simply because I have been unable to check my messages, and therefore couldn't argue for it.
166:. You being unable to argue is indeed a reason for speedy undeletion. I'm sorry it got deleted (don't take it personal) and hope it is restored soon and you don't resent me for proposing it -I acted in good faith. Keep up the good work!--
438:
This article has been in existence since 2004. Why does this information need to be added to it 4 years later? Furthermore, why, if this information is so important, has it not come up for the 17 years the band
294:. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our
248:
in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:
287:
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on
132:
522:
insignificant. Why are there no articles that state he was a member of the band? If he was indeed a member, just leave him in the "past members section", and stop focusing the article around him.
587:
over, but keep in mind that the purpose is to inform the average person, rather than appeal to completists. I apologize for my earlier harsh tone, and thank you for bringing this info to light.
528:
in the first place. What average person even knows or cares about the Jim Marcus essay? You make it sound like some sort of vast conspiracy, yet even most fans of the band aren't aware of it.
333:
is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge (XXG) policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
427:
I've emailed SMG directly, and they have replied that the information in the article is bogus. Until you can absolutely prove that you were a part of the band, it should be left out.
53:
Nice work! I'm actually a big fan of Ashtrayhead (well, Marc Heal in general). It's nice to have other contributors on here that wish to expand the information on this genre!
88:
process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also
544:
Why are lines such as "sometimes people step on people" important to the article? It sounds like more sour grapes, and is seemingly only in place to discredit Chris Randall.
212:
It's the same problem like Aggrotech. No other country uses the term for this kind of music. In Europe, the listed music groups are categorized as "Industrial rock". --
868:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
818:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
865:
158:
I'm sorry but I was unable to decide from the article that it was notable. But you provide good arguments so I agree it should be undeleted. I've requested so
281:
815:
325:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at
766:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
669:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
96:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG), or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at
260:
771:
674:
337:
330:
341:
299:
740:
643:
329:
carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at
89:
416:
736:
639:
839:
775:
678:
451:
combative to you, but when a claim like this comes out of the blue, it needs more than hearsay to be considered substantial and true.
111:
362:
336:
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our
710:
617:
321:
245:
85:
556:
your grievances with Chris Randall. If you have a problem with him, drop him an email. Leave it out of Knowledge (XXG).
326:
861:
811:
744:
647:
163:
280:
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject,
226:
171:
119:
864:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
814:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at
273:
349:
760:
717:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
624:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
433:
done). Without sources to back up the information, though, edits like this should not be considered factual.
412:
254:
236:
404:
93:
779:
714:
682:
456:
PS, please read up on how to use Knowledge (XXG). You wiped out my user page when you posted this there.
22:
408:
167:
115:
241:
159:
872:
876:
752:
663:
655:
500:
345:
303:
104:
26:
759:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
662:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
824:
785:
688:
575:
504:
723:
630:
807:
727:
621:
42:
767:
670:
213:
295:
282:
requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license
539:
Oh, and I cited sources to support my information too, something you seem unwilling to do.
206:
735:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
638:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s
74:
702:
609:
110:
template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to
857:
843:
850:
800:
590:
560:
482:
461:
365:
190:
144:
97:
54:
140:
30:
240:. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under
136:
34:
315:
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:HypoFixxFromManToMachineCover.jpg
871:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
821:
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.
516:
who missed out when the band went on to be successful without them.
880:
830:
789:
692:
598:
579:
568:
508:
490:
469:
420:
373:
353:
306:
216:
193:
174:
147:
122:
81:
57:
45:
38:
133:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject_Music/Notability_and_Music_Guidelines
114:, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
770:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
701:
673:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
608:
276:, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
225:
398:
267:
without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template
747:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
650:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
739:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
642:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
290:
41:
fame). Tell me what you think about it, if you care...
298:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
244:, but its use in Knowledge (XXG) articles fails our
340:. If you have any questions please ask them at the
866:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Bile (band)
84:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the
816:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Hypofixx
135:. Primarily, the band consists of members of
8:
363:Image_talk:HypoFixxFromManToMachineCover.jpg
331:Knowledge (XXG):Fair use rationale guideline
222:Replaceable fair use Image:HypoFixxWhite.jpg
730:which has also been nominated for deletion.
90:Knowledge (XXG):What Knowledge (XXG) is not
284:, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
698:Proposed deletion of From Man to Machine
713:template has been added to the article
620:template has been added to the article
322:Image:HypoFixxFromManToMachineCover.jpg
112:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
860:, an article that you created, for
810:, an article that you created, for
722:No indication of notability; fails
189:Steven, thank you for the response
399:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Sovex
14:
745:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy
648:Knowledge (XXG)'s deletion policy
849:
799:
629:No indication of notability per
327:Knowledge (XXG):Non-free content
261:di-replaceable fair use disputed
342:media copyright questions page
300:Media copyright questions page
1:
881:01:42, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
831:01:59, 19 February 2009 (UTC)
790:03:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
778:, where it may be deleted if
693:03:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)
681:, where it may be deleted if
605:Proposed deletion of Hypofixx
599:22:54, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
580:19:04, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
569:03:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
509:03:00, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
491:18:20, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
470:16:07, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
421:07:09, 30 January 2008 (UTC)
338:criteria for speedy deletion
307:05:07, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
217:23:03, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
741:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
644:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
374:16:51, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
354:17:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
25:- I adapted it's guide for
896:
795:AfD nomination of Hypofixx
255:the image description page
94:Knowledge (XXG):Importance
80:" template to the article
768:proposed deletion process
671:proposed deletion process
274:the image discussion page
194:16:13, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
175:10:14, 27 July 2006 (UTC)
148:19:46, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
123:13:27, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
772:speedy deletion criteria
675:speedy deletion criteria
594:
564:
486:
465:
369:
246:first fair use criterion
237:Image:HypoFixxWhite.jpg
58:18:36, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
46:01:54, 7 May 2005 (UTC)
21:Thanks for the info on
782:to delete is reached.
737:criteria for inclusion
706:
685:to delete is reached.
640:criteria for inclusion
613:
231:
840:Articles for deletion
776:Articles for Deletion
774:or it can be sent to
705:
679:Articles for Deletion
677:or it can be sent to
612:
319:Thanks for uploading
234:Thanks for uploading
229:
29:, another project by
726:. Album article for
230:Replaceable fair use
100:. If you remove the
715:From Man to Machine
257:and edit it to add
27:Ashtrayhead (album)
23:Wikiproject: Albums
707:
614:
385:Sister Machine Gun
232:
856:I have nominated
806:I have nominated
711:proposed deletion
618:proposed deletion
423:
407:comment added by
168:Steven Fruitsmaak
116:Steven Fruitsmaak
86:proposed deletion
66:Proposed deletion
887:
853:
829:
827:
803:
788:
758:
757:
751:
691:
661:
660:
654:
402:
397:Retrieved from "
293:
264:
109:
103:
79:
73:
70:I've added the "
895:
894:
890:
889:
888:
886:
885:
884:
854:
847:
825:
822:
804:
797:
783:
755:
749:
748:
700:
686:
658:
652:
651:
607:
387:
317:
296:Fair Use policy
289:
258:
224:
210:
107:
101:
77:
71:
68:
19:
12:
11:
5:
893:
891:
848:
846:
842:nomination of
837:
835:
798:
796:
793:
733:
732:
699:
696:
636:
635:
606:
603:
602:
601:
588:
558:
557:
552:
551:
546:
545:
541:
540:
536:
535:
530:
529:
524:
523:
518:
517:
496:
495:
494:
493:
480:
473:
472:
458:
457:
453:
452:
447:
446:
441:
440:
435:
434:
429:
428:
386:
383:
381:
379:
378:
377:
376:
346:BetacommandBot
316:
313:
311:
304:High on a tree
278:
277:
270:
223:
220:
209:
207:Coldwave (USA)
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
196:
180:
179:
178:
177:
153:
152:
151:
150:
67:
64:
63:
62:
61:
60:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
892:
883:
882:
878:
874:
869:
867:
863:
859:
852:
845:
841:
838:
836:
833:
832:
828:
826:FreeRangeFrog
819:
817:
813:
809:
802:
794:
792:
791:
787:
786:FreeRangeFrog
781:
777:
773:
769:
764:
762:
761:its talk page
754:
746:
742:
738:
731:
729:
725:
720:
719:
718:
716:
712:
704:
697:
695:
694:
690:
689:FreeRangeFrog
684:
680:
676:
672:
667:
665:
664:its talk page
657:
649:
645:
641:
634:
632:
627:
626:
625:
623:
619:
611:
604:
600:
596:
592:
589:
585:
584:
583:
581:
577:
571:
570:
566:
562:
554:
553:
548:
547:
543:
542:
538:
537:
532:
531:
526:
525:
520:
519:
514:
513:
512:
510:
506:
502:
492:
488:
484:
481:
477:
476:
475:
474:
471:
467:
463:
460:
459:
455:
454:
449:
448:
443:
442:
437:
436:
431:
430:
426:
425:
424:
422:
418:
414:
410:
409:Marcondes1968
406:
400:
395:
391:
384:
382:
375:
371:
367:
364:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
332:
328:
324:
323:
314:
312:
309:
308:
305:
302:. Thank you.
301:
297:
292:
285:
283:
275:
271:
268:
262:
256:
252:
251:
250:
247:
243:
239:
238:
228:
221:
219:
218:
215:
208:
205:
195:
192:
188:
187:
186:
185:
184:
183:
182:
181:
176:
173:
169:
165:
161:
157:
156:
155:
154:
149:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
128:
127:
126:
125:
124:
121:
117:
113:
106:
99:
95:
91:
87:
83:
76:
65:
59:
56:
52:
51:
50:
49:
48:
47:
44:
40:
36:
32:
28:
24:
16:
870:
855:
834:
820:
805:
765:
734:
721:
708:
668:
637:
628:
615:
572:
559:
497:
396:
392:
388:
380:
344:. Thank you.
335:
320:
318:
310:
286:
279:
266:
235:
233:
211:
69:
43:JM.Beaubourg
20:
858:Bile (band)
844:Bile (band)
403:—Preceding
361:Replied at
214:Breathtaker
753:dated prod
656:dated prod
105:dated prod
98:Talk:C-Tec
873:Weaponbb7
780:consensus
683:consensus
291:this link
141:Front 242
31:Marc Heal
862:deletion
812:deletion
808:Hypofixx
728:Hypofixx
724:WP:MUSIC
631:WP:MUSIC
622:Hypofixx
501:Offonvol
439:existed?
417:contribs
405:unsigned
242:fair use
137:Cubanate
35:Cubanate
37:and...
743:" and
646:" and
253:Go to
591:Sovex
561:Sovex
534:days.
483:Sovex
479:work.
462:Sovex
366:Sovex
191:Sovex
145:Sovex
82:C-Tec
55:Sovex
39:C-Tec
17:C-Tec
877:talk
595:talk
576:talk
565:talk
550:out.
505:talk
487:talk
466:talk
445:up".
413:talk
370:talk
350:talk
172:Talk
164:here
162:and
160:here
139:and
120:Talk
92:and
75:prod
33:(of
401:"
272:On
879:)
763:.
756:}}
750:{{
709:A
666:.
659:}}
653:{{
616:A
597:)
582:]
578:)
567:)
511:)
507:)
489:)
468:)
419:)
415:•
372:)
352:)
265:,
263:}}
259:{{
170:|
118:|
108:}}
102:{{
78:}}
72:{{
875:(
823:§
784:§
687:§
633:.
593:(
563:(
503:(
499:(
485:(
464:(
411:(
368:(
348:(
269:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.