124:
thank you so much for the improvements. At the time, I was writing a paper on marginal utility and wasn't sure if I understood it completely, so I looked to wikipedia for some help... obviously I was dissapointed. Had this version of the article been there then, I'm sure it would've helped me a lot.
330:
explain Marx's interia; Marx certainly admitted to no such thing, and Hayek was a cautious man. I wouldn't say that Hayek's suggestion is particularly well-known, but it was at least parenthetically appropriate to the discussion. I will try to get the relevant cite for you. I encountered Hayek's
302:
Hey, Slam Diego, I was reading the article on
Marginal Utility, and was interested in Hayek's particular claim that Marx must have read one of the early marginalists, and was thus demoralized and couldn't write the later volumes of Capital. I wanted to read the relevant bits of Hayek. I'm sure
207:
Well, according to policy, as long as the sources are from books that are not self-published by the authors or from articles that were published in journals, they they can't reject them. If they delete sourced information, it's considered disruptive and vandalistic. If something is not sourced,
193:
The history section has lots of explicit referencing, so I assume that your concern is for the earlier section. I could put sourcing thereïn, but a problem would be that those same foes could reject any of the potential sources.
287:
of the same set of changes, and weren't (on my reading of the 3RR) a violation of the 3RR. But the issue probably wouldn't be worth argument even if it weren't moot. —
183:
By the way, if you could provide sources that would be great, otherwise the information is eventually going to be deleted by someone who doesn't like what it says. —
335:
by
Alexander H. Shand, but I am not perfectly sure of that. I'll drop by your Talk page when I've got the cite (and I'll stick a reference into the article). —
251:. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future. The duration of the
312:
I forgot to say that I think I determined that you were the one who added this bit. Your management of the page seems excellent.
139:
article. I'm glad someone finally showed up who understands it more thoroughly than me and others. You may want to improve the
248:
108:
96:
84:
72:
60:
42:
348:
For anyone else who has wandered here and for some reason followed this discussion with interest, I note that it was in
148:
256:
209:
184:
156:
144:
349:
126:
17:
373:
As promised, I both incorporated a cite in the article and left a note on you user talk page. —
356:, rather than in Shand that I encountered the reference. And I've amended the cite to Hayek
241:
166:
152:
136:
118:
360:
because it seemes that the latter significantly rewrote portions of the work in question. —
225:
Yeah, I don't deny your point. It's just that there's a limit to what can be done here. —
303:
this is a well known claim, but I couldn't Google my way to finding it. Yours, frege1b
374:
361:
336:
288:
273:
226:
195:
174:
377:
364:
339:
316:
307:
291:
276:
265:
There's an old joke about nuclear grenades: “Who'd throw it?” I guess that we have
259:
229:
212:
198:
187:
177:
159:
129:
313:
304:
170:
140:
208:
according to policy, anyone is free to delete it. And believe me they will. —
333:
The
Capitalist Alternative: An Introduction to Neo-Austrian Economics
331:
suggestion through a secondary source; I believe that it was
266:
252:
247:
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the
155:
articles may be of interest. Thanks for your efforts. —
173:
article. I may deal with some of the others later. —
240:Regarding reversions made on 10 March 2007 to
8:
322:I would note that Hayek was merely making a
165:Thanks. After I've done some more work on
38:
25:
7:
51:Some earlier messages may be found
24:
283:For the record: These reversions
1:
130:03:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
230:02:05, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
213:01:47, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
199:01:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
188:01:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
178:01:40, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
160:01:26, 10 January 2007 (UTC)
394:
365:23:44, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
292:23:31, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
277:17:52, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
260:17:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
149:subjective theory of value
378:07:45, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
340:18:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
317:17:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
308:17:35, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
169:, I plan to tackle the
143:article too. Also the
145:labor theory of value
257:William M. Connolley
97:the fourth orc hive
73:the second orc hive
18:User talk:SlamDiego
354:From Marx to Mises
210:Anarcho-capitalism
185:Anarcho-capitalism
157:Anarcho-capitalism
109:the fifth orc hive
106:
94:
85:the third orc hive
82:
70:
61:the first orc hive
58:
249:three-revert rule
115:
114:
104:
92:
80:
68:
56:
37:
36:
385:
242:Marginal utility
153:paradox of value
137:marginal utility
135:Good job on the
119:Marginal utility
39:
26:
393:
392:
388:
387:
386:
384:
383:
382:
300:
245:
122:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
391:
389:
381:
380:
370:
369:
368:
367:
343:
342:
299:
298:Hayek and Marx
296:
295:
294:
280:
279:
244:
238:
237:
236:
235:
234:
233:
232:
218:
217:
216:
215:
202:
201:
181:
180:
121:
116:
113:
112:
101:
100:
89:
88:
77:
76:
65:
64:
53:
52:
48:
47:
35:
34:
31:
30:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
390:
379:
376:
372:
371:
366:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
344:
341:
338:
334:
329:
325:
321:
320:
319:
318:
315:
310:
309:
306:
297:
293:
290:
286:
282:
281:
278:
275:
271:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
255:is 12 hours.
254:
250:
243:
239:
231:
228:
224:
223:
222:
221:
220:
219:
214:
211:
206:
205:
204:
203:
200:
197:
192:
191:
190:
189:
186:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
163:
162:
161:
158:
154:
150:
146:
142:
138:
133:
131:
128:
120:
117:
110:
103:
102:
98:
91:
90:
86:
79:
78:
74:
67:
66:
62:
55:
54:
50:
49:
46:
45:
41:
40:
33:
32:
28:
27:
19:
357:
353:
332:
327:
323:
311:
301:
284:
267:
246:
182:
167:that article
134:
123:
43:
171:Marginalism
141:marginalism
358:or Bartley
326:that this
324:suggestion
375:SlamDiego
362:SlamDiego
337:SlamDiego
289:SlamDiego
274:SlamDiego
227:SlamDiego
196:SlamDiego
175:SlamDiego
44:Orc Hives
29:Contents
127:Xiaoxitu
314:Frege1b
305:Frege1b
285:weren't
350:Steele
270:answer
151:, and
253:block
75:, or
63:, or
16:<
352:'s
328:may
272:. —
268:one
107:in
95:in
83:in
71:in
59:in
147:,
132:.
111:.
99:.
87:.
194:—
125:—
105:·
93:·
81:·
69:·
57:·
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.