User talk:Spudst3r - Knowledge (XXG)

351:, you are hereby banned from making any edit or commenting on any content relating to the the men's rights movement, including any issues or people associated with that movement and closely related issues. This topic ban is in place indefinitely, but can be reviewed after three months of productive editing in another topic area. The reason for this restriction is that you have, in my opinion, an unhealthy focus on this topic and it would be in your interests and those of the encyclopaedia for you to broaden your editing interests; the immediate cause is your repeated addition of editorial-style content to encyclopaedia articles, based on novel synthesis of source material. This is as a result of 678: 2642: 2604: 2524: 2417: 1752: 715: 2693: 1936: 1677: 1066: 993: 22: 2441:. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge (XXG)’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced and Knowledge (XXG) administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. 1585: 1420: 1183: 437: 658: 556: 917: 2028: 1826: 2267:, just a friendly warning that today you were in violation of the 3 revert rule by reverting my changes and those of other editors. I opened that talk section, a discussion was had, and with good reasons given by other editors nobody agreed with your position. Respectfully, you are the one doing edit warring and disruptive editing on that page, while accusing others of it. 252:

College papers are fine as sources for verification of content, but how useful they are as sources to establish notability is debatable. I think it depends on various circumstances, such as how substantial the coverage is. However, since you have contested the deletion in the above message, I will restore the article. It will still be possible for someone to take it to

1145: 2173:

Thanks for the response, I think you are right. There is a lot of emotional editing and tendentious watering down of the stated facts that appears to be going on, to favour a narrative of minimization. I don't really understand this drive, an encyclopedia should preserve all the relevant prominent

164:

Please stop uploading images for which you fail to add the appropriate copyright details, or whose details you don't have. We take copyright status very seriously and the images you uploaded don't have this information, so have been nominated for deletion. While you may have made the screen capture,

2226:

by repeatedly try to add BZ into the article as a source. That is disruptive editing, verges on edit warring, and does not help improve the article. It’s intentional actions like that which get people topic banned or even permanently banned from wiki. Multiple times it's been explained to you and

2150:

I think this is going to be one of those things that we'll have to wait until the war's end before Hersh's reporting can be cross-verified by a third party, and then we'll finally see some cracks in the dam start to loosen up on this information. Well, my real guess is that the war will end, then

2122:

the secondary coverage on Hersh, let alone citing the secondary articles saying that "Hersh is bogus," which actually might be a good citation to add; but I think that's what's really going on and that's the reason that no one has outright deleted it from the article entirely. Why do you think it

2079:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion

355:

at AE, but note that this restriction is imposed under the community sanctions rather than under Arbitration Committee discretionary sanctions. Although there is considerable overlap between the two, the consensus appears to be that the articles on masculinity and the men's rights movement are not

251:

The coverage seemed rather parochial, and not all that substantial. What exists in other articles is not always a good guide, as there are many articles which don't satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s guidelines, and which may well be deleted if and when someone notices them and nominates them for deletion.

2339:

We follow wiki policies. Not yours, not mine, & not others. If you reject this warning and continue to engage in GAMING, disruptive editing, edit wars, and flagrantly disregarding policies you will leave me no choice but to bring up your behavoir disruptive on a noticeboard with Adm. Best

228:

Hi James, I added quite a number of sources indicating notability, but it appears that the page has been deleted again. College papers have been used for sources on other pages that I've used. There are also other non-college news sources like the Toronto Star that were sourced. Why was it

1911:

Please do not attribute things I was not doing: I genuinely did not see your surprise revert and was merely updating my original edit, no sneaky edit intended whatsoever. I'm unclear why merely stating the scientific and cited fact that no source has been found yet is objectionable or

1078:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1689:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2113:

on the page regarding Hersh. I'm honestly surprised, since most of the time all mention of it would have been completely removed. I think the reason is that there's enough secondary coverage of Hersh that that's why the other mods haven't been able to claim wholesale

376:

Absolutely unbelievable. "Unhealthy focus"? I wonder if this idea will be fairly applied to all editors exhibiting and "unhealthy focus", or more likely, it will only be applied to those whose opinions do not mesh with the cabal of highly-POV admins/watchdogs? Shame...

2607:

You have recently made edits related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. This is a standard message to inform you that post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people is a designated contentious topic. This message

587:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge (XXG) page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 2358:

please assume good faith, tone down your rhetoric and not personalize the argument. I know we have an editorial disagreement about this but I have actually come to your defence on a previous edit. E.g.: changing "stated" to "accused" was a good one per

1005:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1497:

No amount of sub-reddits help contribute to notability, nor do conference websites, or sites like littlelines.com, or official company webpages. A single offline book might contribute to notability, but right now this and infoworld.com are the only

633:. I'll delete the files as they clearly don't have a suitable license for Knowledge (XXG). It would be worth contacting the authors of that paper to ask if they would be willing to release the images under a CC-BY-SA license, though! Thanks. 165:

you did not make the original image and that is what counts, so you cannot own the copyright and these images are most likely copyright of the original cinematographer which is not you. Please don't upload images unless you have the

209:

I see you haven't edited the article yet. It was restored because you said you knew of sources that indicate notability, but if you don't edit the article to incorporate that evidence of notability then it will be deleted again.

2130:

page, where I was being denied to even mention that the massive amount of money printing was a cause, despite sourcing Stanford/Johns Hopkins economists and being well-within reputable sources with WSJ/CNBC/Forbes, and I was

2060:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1387:. 2 million concurrent sockets (as noted in one of your external references) is notable, as is the repo having over 10,000 stars, putting it well into the top quartile of the top 2500 GitHub repos. The stub-class article 2738: 1979: 1717: 1106: 1033: 829:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 408:. Its been over a year since this topic ban and I've made many edits since in quite a variety of subjects. Can I have this reviewed now? Cheers. (Also sorry for those nasty ppl above, I don't know them.) 523:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the 583:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

2722:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2298:& looking for 'loopholes' to intentionally edit in bad-faith. You knew BZ is not an RS when you re-added it. And now you 'warned' me not to undo your edit where you added the BZ citation and say 1963:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1701:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1090:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1017:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2139:

listing, and Johns Hopkins/Stanford economists are experts" suddenly took hold and I was able to get that single section in there. It's weird from a Knowledge (XXG) Policy POV, because that graph

2135:

getting reverted. It wasn't until the M2 v. inflation graph was posted that there was suddenly a 180 degree turn, and then all of a sudden my arguments that "Hey, WSJ/CNBC/Forbes are in the

2707: 1949: 1791: 525: 2472:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics

1453: 1379: 1216: 2481: 1391:

is available. Thanks to the other editors for their feedback and requirement of secondary, non-related sources and many thanks to your for your work on this important topic.

1466: 1229: 356:

within the scope of the gamergate discretionary sanctions (which cover "any gender-related dispute or controversy"), but that controversies relating to them would be.

1834: 959:

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at

1602:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1500:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

1270:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

454:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

756: 684: 348: 577: 513: 325: 2649:, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. This is a standard message to inform you that articles about 883: 295: 779:

if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the

938:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply 2650: 2646: 573: 564: 80:

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

119:

to editing the CFS article. While I think I understand your desire to add certain information, your approach is not at all constructive or helpful.

2057: 2017: 1880: 588: 85: 281: 2219:) And I know you read that comment about BZ not being listed as a wiki RS because you replied to me and ‘thanked me’ for giving you the list, here 1616:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

1514:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

1284:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

2653:, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles is a designated contentious topic. This message 1837:. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to 1472: 1235: 934:

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia

596: 2576:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 1800:. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. 879: 291: 2761: 2147:

about that graph, but in practice that's how it works sometimes. I think a similar unmentioned psychological phenomena is happening here.

2002: 1871:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

1731: 1120: 1047: 854: 392: 378: 54: 776: 592: 2399: 391:

It's embarassing, but I have to share a country with HJ Mitchell. It's incredible such bigots are given a platform by Knowledge (XXG).

50: 1476: 1239: 120: 2084:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 1591: 1572: 1426: 1407: 1342: 1189: 1170: 424: 169:

of the copyright holder or you produced them yourself and are releasing them under a free licence. You may find it useful to read my

89: 1770:). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose 1596:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Knowledge (XXG). You can find it and improve it at

766: 448:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Knowledge (XXG). You can find it and improve it at

2547: 1775: 572:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge (XXG) is acceptable. Please go to 535:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! -- 1653: 1551: 1321: 488: 2757: 2151:

there'll be a report released by a Danish investigation team, nobody will report on it and nobody will know about it, and then

1998: 1727: 1116: 1043: 850: 2731: 2662: 2617: 2567: 2543: 2037: 1972: 1876: 1842: 1710: 1099: 1026: 876:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 799: 613: 584: 288:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2065: 1771: 29: 1617: 1610: 1576: 1515: 1508: 1411: 1354: 1346: 1285: 1278: 1174: 1151: 1136: 2559: 2081: 1787: 721: 2310:& disruptive editing, edit warring, & intentionally ignoring wiki policies can get a person permanently banned. 2555: 1886: 1783: 841:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

58: 2743: 1984: 1722: 1111: 1038: 846: 148: 2551: 2044: 1779: 667:, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Knowledge (XXG)'s 868:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

780: 762: 610: 280:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

74: 2673: 2628: 2590: 2507: 2127: 1594:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mighty Glen was:

1331: 1192:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

1159: 1872: 1830: 2719: 2542:. Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has authorised uninvolved administrators to impose 1960: 1698: 1087: 1014: 382: 36:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern: 2395: 2345: 2253: 2222:. Yet, even after knowing BZ is not a wiki RS you are flagrantly & intentionally ignoring wiki policies 1597: 1388: 446:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sam Sailor was:

124: 2387: 2324: 2245: 2231: 2174:

discourse and let the reader decide. I myself have no idea whether Hersh is lying or being misled either.

1797: 1429:

has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chetsford was:

960: 166: 2488: 2095: 714: 333: 261: 215: 199: 101: 2573: 2563: 2477: 2201:

You are engaging in disruptive editing & edit warring in both the Nord Stream explosion article page

1846: 1838: 1446: 1372: 1261: 1209: 935: 842: 93: 1396: 726: 673: 365: 33: 1431:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge (XXG) requires

1265: 1194:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge (XXG) requires

928: 910: 531: 462: 428: 1493:

sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge (XXG) at this time.

1256:

sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Knowledge (XXG) at this time.

738:, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was 2667: 2622: 2584: 2501: 1659: 1327: 1155: 693: 539: 498: 2701: 1943: 1685: 1074: 1001: 983: 818: 809: 2539: 1849:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 1561: 741: 638: 178: 66: 2715: 2363:. Please try not to view the process as adversarial and let us come to a constructive consensus. 2307: 2205: 2076: 2053: 2021: 1956: 1694: 1083: 1010: 963:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. 838: 822: 630: 194:

Thanks for your message on my talk page. I have restored the article, so that you can improve it.

73:

notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on

2391: 2355: 2341: 2264: 2249: 2163: 793: 607: 188: 170: 2424: 2241: 2223: 2115: 2230:, that if you all want to try to get BZ listed as a wiki RS then you must follow wiki rules at 2091: 1895: 1810: 899: 529:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the 329: 311: 257: 211: 195: 97: 2727: 2061: 1968: 1706: 1630:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 1528:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 1095: 1022: 834: 826: 569: 81: 2750: 2529:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

1991: 1757:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect.

1624: 1522: 1392: 1292: 869: 405: 357: 2730:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2723: 2202: 2143:

have been the reason to stop reverting the edits, and I was anticipating someone screaming

1971:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1964: 1709:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1702: 1462: 1458: 1384: 1225: 1221: 1132: 1098:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1091: 1025:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1018: 924: 837:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 830: 677: 595:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

443: 253: 1868: 689: 536: 495: 144: 2423:

You have recently been editing Eastern Europe or the Balkans which has been designated a

2144: 2136: 1440: 1366: 1203: 551:

Non-free rationale for File:KIC 8462852-kepler transit-data-graph-smaller-frequencies.png

42: 2056:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 1557: 634: 174: 2523: 2416: 1751: 1486: 1482: 1249: 1245: 759:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page 49:

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge (XXG)'s

2364: 2327:

says [[tq| "start a discussion about it at the reliable sources noticeboard (RSN)}} (

2289: 2268: 2196: 2175: 2159: 1913: 1150:

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at

967: 890:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

789: 602: 409: 302:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

230: 21: 2484:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the 1906: 1891: 1806: 895: 891: 307: 303: 2692: 1935: 1676: 1065: 992: 512: 2427:. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and 2437:

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as

2360: 2080:

tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with

749: 733: 664: 449: 2300:"just a friendly warning that today you were in violation of the 3 revert rule 2155:

can get added to the article; but by then nobody will care about this article.

1584: 1419: 1182: 436: 2207:

under the sub-section topic you started titled “Berliner Zeitung as RS” (here

139: 138:

Please discuss the image on the talk page rather than restoring it again. ---

2783:"Understanding the Factors that Impact the Popularity of GitHub Repositories" 770: 668: 2465:

comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and

2036:

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

1767: 873: 2734:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2212:

It’s been explained to you & proven to you that Berliner Zeitung is

1975:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1857:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

1713:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1469:

when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing

1232:

when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing

1102:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1029:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

923:

Hello, Spudst3r. It has been over six months since you last edited your

489:

Knowledge (XXG)'s Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors

2782: 2711:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1953:

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

825:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2765: 2680: 2635: 2597: 2514: 2403: 2372: 2349: 2276: 2257: 2183: 2167: 2099: 2071:

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may

2006: 1921: 1899: 1814: 1735: 1664: 1565: 1400: 1335: 1163: 1124: 1051: 977: 903: 858: 803: 697: 642: 619: 541: 500: 417: 396: 386: 370: 337: 315: 265: 238: 219: 203: 182: 154: 128: 105: 2661:

For more information about the contentious topics system, please see

2616:

For more information about the contentious topics system, please see

568:. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under 1144: 966:

Thanks for your submission to Knowledge (XXG), and happy editing.

626: 565:

File:KIC 8462852-kepler transit-data-graph-smaller-frequencies.png

285: 2747:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 2535:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

1988:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1763:

imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

2737:

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

2705:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All

1978:

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review

1716:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

1609:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1507:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1277:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

1105:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1032:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

657: 461:

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

256:, but if so it is by no means certain that it will be deleted. 2335:) if you want to try to get Berliner Zeitung listed as an RS. 1947:

is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All

1867:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

1654:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

1552:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

1322:

Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors

709: 652: 629:

is linked to in the "(license)" link under 'Download' - it's

2086: 2026: 1583: 1418: 1181: 1143: 915: 554: 435: 84:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the 20: 2295: 2190:

Please stop your disruptive editing & stop edit warring

1489:

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional

1252:

and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional

61:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the 2118:

and not have it mentioned on the page at all. Nobody is

1620:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 1518:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 1288:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 1633:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

1531:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

1301:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

468:

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the

53:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also " 2718: