Knowledge

User talk:Srthompson721

Source 📝

848:: "This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions. (October 2021)" It may look only like self-promotion, but my books are historically relevant. I am writing about history that has been whitewashed. I am trying to change that with my work. It's the history I value more than my books. I make so little on them, given my time, labor, and expense, that profit is a moot and laughable point. More important is no one has written more books on 853:
anyone else which figures and events in history I write about. If that is an error on my part, it's an innocent error. I am a legitimate academic with award-winning books about a plethora of historical subjects. If you don't want me to link my book to them or even to Bass Reeves, I don't know what to say but ok, I won't, but some exception to the rule of self-promotion should be reasonable in some cases. In this case. Please reconsider.
598: 670: 759: 79: 702: 424: 23: 544:
organizations. I don't understand why someone is removing my edits to these figures' pages when I merely state the obvious, that their lives are rendered within my books, and I am providing those verifiable claims under the category of Literature. What is the problem? Someone please tell me. And then tell me why it's a problem for me but not for others.
324: 286: 955:
has some guidance about this -- we'd be very happy if some editor other than you the author was citing your work in the relevant articles, and if you declare yourself properly (a technicality) there's no reason you can't suggest material in your own work on the article talk pages. What we're really
875:
Procedural decline only. This unblock request has been open for more than two weeks but has not proven sufficient for any reviewing administrator to take action. You are welcome to request a new block review if you substantially reword your request. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing
852:
than I have. My work matters to people. They should know it exists, be able to find it because there is so little on the subject. It makes no sense that I as an author and academic have a page but no articles linked to me, so I was merely trying to remedy the situation because I know better than
543:
I am only making objective, neutral, factual statements. My historical fiction includes facts about many historical figures: George R. Reeves, Belle Starr, and Bass Reeves in particular. My books have received 8 honors from various western, historical, educational, literary, and African-American
631:
I don't see that I have anything subjective or soapboxing. I am merely pointing out what awards the books have won, what reviews and published authors have said, and what relevant history and subject matter can be found in the books. More than anything, I hope to promote the history, where
956:
trying to resist is self-promotion; I don't think you're trying to that, but the kneejerk reaction around here is indeed to assume self-promotion because we get so much of that. So you're not unfairly blocked; you're fairly blocked, but we can fix that.
632:
information can be found for rarely discussed historical figures and places of reference that are gaining national and international interest. Can you be more specific, please. I'm new to Knowledge and am happy to revise. Thank you!
518:'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See 354: 648:
by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use and you continually avoid doing so. You have spent four months making no edits other than ones which promote yourself and your own books.
986:. Readers of this article will likely want to go online to look up Bass Reeves and also me. Knowledge benefits from that connection, doesn't it?. Thank you for your consideration! 240: 572:. When your edits to articles are challenged, you need to discuss the issue on the articles' talk pages. You simply keep putting back content that other editors have removed. 116: 238:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 129: 145:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
228: 939:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
184: 799: 674: 26:
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Knowledge. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to
519: 177: 103: 159:
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
924: 902: 794: 727: 559: 432: 983: 337:
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Knowledge! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
42:
submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on
31: 614: 606: 503: 386: 365: 311: 85: 66: 678: 483: 445: 125: 109: 350: 204: 121: 525:
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
382: 361: 254:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 813: 747: 450: 947:
This is a tough issue. Obviously, you are acting in good faith, and you do seem to be the #1 expert when it comes to
771:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
300: 259: 214: 88:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:
772: 715: 710: 952: 766: 443:(COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the 381:
Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to
43: 844:
I believe that I have been unfairly blocked for attempting to do what someone posted on my Knowledge page,
743: 686: 653: 622: 530: 132:
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge.
987: 854: 777: 551: 470: 296: 292: 277: 255: 210: 160: 153: 70: 27: 682: 649: 618: 526: 176:
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
547: 515: 440: 428: 346: 91: 979: 578: 349:. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they 250: 137: 47: 984:
https://www.oxygen.com/unsung-heroes/the-legacy-of-bass-reeves-the-first-black-deputy-us-marshal
460:
articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
431:
your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
982:
about Bass Reeves, which refers to my books and cites my interview with the article's author:
640:
that you are Sidney Thompson) is promotional. You have been asked repeatedly to disclose your
569: 124:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 173:" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit. 933: 733: 141: 35: 971: 910: 845: 436: 330: 315: 720: 493: 408: 167: 967: 957: 641: 573: 291:
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at
273: 39: 597: 227: 394: 975: 948: 849: 78: 906: 602: 960: 914: 862: 751: 690: 657: 626: 585: 534: 412: 404: 360:
Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now
304: 263: 218: 59: 701: 880:
the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Knowledge,
726:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
730:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 423: 364:
without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to
22: 248:
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
323: 285: 601:
Please do not add promotional material to Knowledge, as you did to
393:
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
482:
your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see
333:, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. 636:
Repeatedly adding links to your own books (at this point it is
152:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
187:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
757: 700: 322: 284: 77: 609:
about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services
98:
coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in
90:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
921:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
719:
from editing because your account is being used only for
371:
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the
163:, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add " 941:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
681:
incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
466:
on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the
205:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
827: 823: 817: 808: 804: 790: 786: 782: 637: 395: 374: 197: 189: 492:
to your organization's website in other articles (see
664:
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
156:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
892:
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
765:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
484:
Knowledge:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI
183:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
615:a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion 353:over time. You may like to take a look at the 886:the block is no longer necessary because you 8: 889:understand what you have been blocked for, 675:Knowledge:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 32:User:Srthompson721/sandbox/Sidney Thompson 357:to see how you can improve the article. 895:will make useful contributions instead. 453:for more information. We ask that you: 970:. I would like to update my own page, 520:Knowledge:Paid-contribution disclosure 122:guidelines on the notability of people 494:Knowledge:Spam#External link spamming 7: 673:There is currently a discussion at 134:The comment the reviewer left was: 978:with a recent national story from 84:Your recent article submission to 14: 402:Thanks again, and happy editing! 341:The article has been assessed as 92:qualifies for a Knowledge article 34:. This has been done because the 668: 596: 422: 226: 21: 418:Managing a conflict of interest 241:Articles for creation help desk 191:Articles for creation help desk 446:conflict of interest guideline 38:is the preferred location for 1: 752:00:09, 10 November 2021 (UTC) 613:acceptable, Knowledge is not 385:without posting a request to 961:21:49, 30 January 2022 (UTC) 863:20:14, 30 January 2022 (UTC) 691:16:29, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 658:18:39, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 627:16:13, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 586:16:14, 29 October 2021 (UTC) 535:16:10, 18 October 2021 (UTC) 147:when they have been resolved 769:, who declined the request. 502:to comply with Knowledge's 413:02:36, 9 October 2021 (UTC) 345:, which is recorded on its 305:02:16, 22 August 2021 (UTC) 94:—that is, they do not show 30:, from its old location at 1003: 925:guide to appealing blocks 915:11:34, 4 March 2022 (UTC) 903:guide to appealing blocks 728:guide to appealing blocks 458:avoid editing or creating 427:Hello, Srthompson721. We 953:Knowledge:Expert editors 858: 721:advertising or promotion 555: 396:leaving us some feedback 383:create articles yourself 362:create articles yourself 264:05:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 219:05:08, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 120:of the subject (see the 60:02:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC) 876:administrator(s) that 905:for more information. 762: 705: 433:you have written about 327: 289: 82: 814:change block settings 761: 738:Your reason here ~~~~ 704: 677:regarding a possible 510:In addition, you are 451:FAQ for organizations 387:Articles for creation 366:Articles for creation 326: 312:Articles for creation 293:Draft:Sidney Thompson 288: 278:Draft:Sidney Thompson 161:Draft:Sidney Thompson 154:Draft:Sidney Thompson 86:Articles for Creation 81: 67:Articles for creation 40:Articles for Creation 28:Draft:Sidney Thompson 679:conflict of interest 516:Wikimedia Foundation 441:conflict of interest 199:reviewer's talk page 980:Oxygen (TV network) 310:Your submission at 65:Your submission at 763: 706: 328: 290: 244:. If you have any 83: 744:GeneralNotability 550:comment added by 439:, you may have a 318:has been accepted 280:has a new comment 270: 269: 185:untoward behavior 130:mistakes to avoid 114:sources that are 994: 938: 932: 901:Please read the 833: 831: 820: 802: 800:deleted contribs 760: 741: 672: 671: 600: 583: 576: 563: 504:content policies 475: 469: 426: 398: 390: 377: 297:Nomadicghumakkad 256:Nomadicghumakkad 230: 223: 222: 211:Nomadicghumakkad 202: 194: 172: 166: 128:and learn about 56: 51: 25: 1002: 1001: 997: 996: 995: 993: 992: 991: 972:Sidney Thompson 944: 936: 930: 929:, then use the 918: 866: 846:Sidney Thompson 821: 811: 797: 780: 773:blocking policy 758: 755: 754: 731: 724: 698: 669: 666: 607:objective prose 594: 579: 574: 545: 473: 467: 464:propose changes 437:Sidney Thompson 420: 415: 380: 373: 369: 331:Sidney Thompson 320: 316:Sidney Thompson 307: 282: 266: 221: 196: 188: 170: 164: 144: 133: 75: 71:Sidney Thompson 52: 49: 36:Draft namespace 19: 12: 11: 5: 1000: 998: 964: 963: 919: 899: 898: 897: 896: 893: 890: 884: 873: 869:Decline reason 842: 838:Request reason 835: 756: 725: 708:You have been 707: 699: 697: 694: 665: 662: 661: 660: 593: 590: 589: 588: 565: 564: 539: 508: 507: 497: 487: 477: 461: 419: 416: 368:if you prefer. 359: 355:grading scheme 338: 335: 321: 319: 308: 283: 281: 276:notification: 271: 268: 267: 233: 231: 209: 208: 181: 178:may be deleted 174: 157: 135: 126:technical help 89: 76: 74: 63: 46:. Thank you. 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 999: 990: 989: 988:Srthompson721 985: 981: 977: 973: 969: 962: 959: 954: 950: 946: 945: 943: 942: 935: 928: 926: 917: 916: 912: 908: 904: 894: 891: 888: 887: 885: 883: 879: 878: 877: 872: 870: 865: 864: 860: 856: 855:Srthompson721 851: 847: 841: 839: 834: 829: 825: 819: 815: 810: 806: 801: 796: 792: 791:global blocks 788: 787:active blocks 784: 779: 778:Srthompson721 774: 770: 768: 767:administrator 753: 749: 745: 739: 735: 729: 722: 718: 717: 713: 712: 703: 696:November 2021 695: 693: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 663: 659: 655: 651: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634: 633: 629: 628: 624: 620: 617:. Thank you. 616: 612: 608: 604: 599: 591: 587: 584: 582: 577: 571: 567: 566: 561: 557: 553: 552:Srthompson721 549: 542: 541: 540: 537: 536: 532: 528: 523: 521: 517: 513: 505: 501: 498: 495: 491: 490:avoid linking 488: 485: 481: 478: 472: 465: 462: 459: 456: 455: 454: 452: 448: 447: 442: 438: 434: 430: 425: 417: 414: 410: 406: 403: 400: 397: 391: 388: 384: 378: 376: 367: 363: 358: 356: 352: 348: 344: 339: 334: 332: 325: 317: 313: 309: 306: 302: 298: 294: 287: 279: 275: 272: 265: 261: 257: 253: 252: 247: 243: 242: 237: 236:Srthompson721 232: 229: 225: 224: 220: 216: 212: 206: 201: 200: 193: 192: 186: 182: 179: 175: 169: 162: 158: 155: 151: 150: 148: 143: 139: 136:Not crossing 131: 127: 123: 119: 118: 113: 112: 107: 106: 101: 97: 93: 87: 80: 72: 68: 64: 62: 61: 58: 57: 55: 45: 41: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 965: 940: 922: 920: 900: 881: 874: 868: 867: 843: 837: 836: 809:creation log 776: 764: 737: 716:indefinitely 714: 709: 683:Notfrompedro 667: 650:Notfrompedro 645: 630: 619:Notfrompedro 610: 595: 592:October 2021 580: 546:— Preceding 538: 527:Notfrompedro 524: 511: 509: 500:do your best 499: 489: 479: 471:request edit 463: 457: 444: 435:on the page 421: 401: 392: 372: 370: 342: 340: 336: 329: 249: 245: 239: 235: 198: 190: 146: 115: 110: 104: 99: 95: 53: 48: 44:my talk page 20: 976:Bass Reeves 966:Thank you, 949:Bass Reeves 850:Bass Reeves 568:Please see 343:Start-Class 138:WP:Academic 117:independent 96:significant 968:--jpgordon 958:--jpgordon 805:filter log 638:very clear 603:Negro Fort 570:WP:COISELF 476:template); 295:. Thanks! 923:read the 824:checkuser 783:block log 644:which is 375:help desk 347:talk page 195:, on the 142:WP:Author 111:secondary 100:published 17:June 2021 795:contribs 736:|reason= 646:required 605:. While 575:Schazjmd 560:contribs 548:unsigned 512:required 480:disclose 251:Teahouse 105:reliable 73:(June 8) 934:unblock 818:unblock 734:unblock 711:blocked 514:by the 429:welcome 351:develop 234:Hello, 203:or use 50:Jupitus 974:, and 581:(talk) 927:first 907:Yamla 246:other 168:Db-g7 54:Smart 911:talk 859:talk 748:talk 723:. 687:talk 654:talk 623:talk 556:talk 531:talk 449:and 409:talk 405:SL93 301:talk 260:talk 215:talk 828:log 775:). 742:. 642:COI 274:AfC 140:or 951:. 937:}} 931:{{ 913:) 882:or 871:: 861:) 840:: 822:• 816:• 812:• 807:• 803:• 798:• 793:• 789:• 785:• 750:) 740:}} 732:{{ 689:) 656:) 625:) 611:is 562:) 558:• 533:) 522:. 496:); 486:); 474:}} 468:{{ 411:) 399:. 314:: 303:) 262:) 217:) 171:}} 165:{{ 149:. 108:, 102:, 69:: 909:( 857:( 832:) 830:) 826:( 781:( 746:( 685:( 652:( 621:( 554:( 529:( 506:. 407:( 389:. 379:. 299:( 258:( 213:( 207:. 180:.

Index

Information icon
Draft:Sidney Thompson
User:Srthompson721/sandbox/Sidney Thompson
Draft namespace
Articles for Creation
my talk page
Jupitus Smart
02:41, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
Articles for creation
Sidney Thompson

Articles for Creation
qualifies for a Knowledge article
reliable
secondary
independent
guidelines on the notability of people
technical help
mistakes to avoid
WP:Academic
WP:Author
Draft:Sidney Thompson
Draft:Sidney Thompson
Db-g7
may be deleted
untoward behavior
Articles for creation help desk
reviewer's talk page
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
Nomadicghumakkad

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.