User talk:TVC 15 - Knowledge (XXG)

288:

mention film depictions. There is a section on film adaptations - discussion of the diferences would be better there - you put it there if you want. I think discussion of the religious themes is important enough to have iots own section and I would support its inclusion. But, please, why do you think a tangetial discussion of different movie versions is in any way suitable for a charcter summary entry in a page about the novel? As for your spurious (and insulting)claims, it is only YOU that I did not "understand" - for the reasons given above and because your attempt atr justification was utterly confused. That previous editors left you material in place may have been oversight - but you will nbotice that the only third party in this debate so far has supported my position and not yours. I suggest you move your material (after rewriting it) to a suitable section/s.

2369:(in exchange for an extra $ 220 billion of federally mandated revenue). Ad-dependent media tend to support their relationships with advertisers; if you check ABC/CBS/NBC newscasts, you can observe they get around 30% of their ads from PhRMA members. I don't know much about HotAir's partisan history, but their story on this particular issue was well sourced and stated in frank terms what most independent observers (and voters) were expressing. It was kind of amazing to watch certain politicians repeating the disproved numbers, and the ABC/CBS/NBC newscasts didn't even call them on it, and then the politicians running for re-election learned the false assurances were backfiring (and so tried to change the subject instead of changing the legislation). 147:

continuously and proliferate to exceed the capacity of any one person. Also, not being a mind-reader, I am not usually capable of guessing everything that someone else might consider part of the principle of a particular policy if it is not apparent from the text. (And many policies reflect compromise among different people advocating different principles anyway.) So, if you believe that I have violated a policy, or what you believe to be the principle of a policy, please let me know and I will be happy to address it. We learn partly by making mistakes and getting corrected, and a linked quote can resolve a disagreement very efficiently.

1217:

your objections. Moreover, you have not provided any discussion at all, and have ignored my invitations to discuss in the Talk page (I have created a section and added a paragraph with three external sources); your edit summaries object to one small point as an excuse to revert everything rather than fixing what you object to. You used Twinkle to revert a whole series of edits including one that merely corrected punctuation; such a group revert is designed to remove vandalism, but you misused it to restore even typographical errors and inconsistencies. Please read the WP article on edit war, in particular the definition.

1297:

unto you: if you spend most of your time simply reverting others' contributions, don't expect them to show extraordinary patience for your deletions. (I can't call them contributions, since they don't contain any information, they merely delete whole passages because of some minor or spurious objection that could easily be addressed by moving or re-phrasing. Nevertheless, even when I did revert Loonymonkey's deletions, I added more sources and/or re-phrased to meet the proffered objections.) Next, try to

448:. On ANI, a large part of the active community can read over what's been going on and give their opinions (You'll also need to notify Tool that there is discussion if you choose to post on ANI about him). It's quicker and easier than RfC. Remember: Keep it simple, plain, and backed up. Don't show bias either as it can nip you right in the bum if it turns out it's 6 of one, half a dozen of the other. Take care and please don't hesitate to contact me if you require anything else. 2424: 3467:

was deleted, I posted it on my own Talk page. The same Admin who imposed the 2-week block changed it to "Indefinite." After editing Knowledge (XXG) for more than a decade, I have now been blocked for placing a comment on my own Talk page. The comment contained no profanity, no threats, nothing that would really justify even a short block, let alone a permanent one. I think the indefinite block was an abuse of admin power and should be reported to ANI.

3304: 1457: 2936: 3254: 3591:

blocked and said the block was unjustified and your comment was fine, and unblocked you, then you could go about seeking to restore your comment. Not reposting it when it had been removed as inappropriate and you blocked in part for it, and you were even afraid it was going to be rev-deleted, and so logically you should have still been uncertain about the appropriateness of your comment or at least what was going on.

1534:(by a series of deletions), then nominated it for deletion during a time when most people (including me) are away or catching up from holiday travel and don't have time for Knowledge (XXG). Did you notify the editors who had contributed to the article that you had nominated it for deletion? No. I didn't find out what you had done until too late. As for "all those other people," I assume you mean "both" of them. 2057: 1233: 1156: 769: 3095: 3022: 2868: 3381: 3548:

planning to take a break, and since my comment had not actually violated any WP policy that I have ever seen, I don't actually understand why a block would even be appropriate. Blocking without warning, and then making the block "indefinite" (again without warning) was abuse, and suggests that "El C" might be pursuing a personal motivation to de-platform certain long-time contributors to WP.

2347:

like you've made an extended effort to clean up the quoting and such. Which is most appreciative. One of the main reasons for this request is that it sets a horrible precedence. It's not only because Hotair is a partisan source(they are), but they have no editorial structure and are not journalist. Annymous bloggers, or partisan sources without editorial structures can never be used as

1313:

encountered this type of persistent reverter/deleter on Knowledge (XXG); they remind me of the small children that delight in kicking down sandcastles at the beach. Knowledge (XXG) is like a shared sandcastle, our work is constantly superceded by the rising tide of new knowledge and events, but contributing generally requires building and shaping, rather than simply reverting/deleting.

3529:, that latitude never extends to allowing stuff which is bad enough to justify rev-deletion. And especially not when blocked, when you're only supposed to be using your talk page to appeal your block, or to ask for help understanding your block. Your talk page ultimately belongs to the community not to you. It's not like you were reposting what you said as part of a block appeal. 176:]. However, following the 24 hour limit can still result in a block, as noted on a different policy page: "An editor who reverts three times in a 24 hour period and once immediately it is the next day, or repeatedly reverts twice only in a day, may well still be sanctioned, since the principle of 3RR, and the issue it is protecting Knowledge (XXG) against, has been breached." ( 3167: 1386: 2647: 2607: 2619:, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the 1984:, but it says "These pages are not the place to raise disputes over content, or reports of abusive behaviour... Knowledge (XXG) has a dispute resolution procedure editors should follow where possible. Please take such disputes to requests for comment, requests for mediation, or requests for arbitration rather than here." So, it seems 2741:, I took a break after seeing too much carefully researched and sourced material deleted. This happened particularly with regard to Obamacare and the medical sector, which brooked no criticism no matter how well founded. I couldn't compete with a $ 3 trillion industry and its legions of publicists and dependents, so I took a break. 835:, I will take at least a day off from editing the article. Also, I really appreciate your detailed comment on the article's talk page. If you look further up on that page, you will see that I have been using the talk page and trying diligently to work towards wording and content that will gain a consensus. 3594:

And the fact you are saying a 2 week block for "highly inflammatory provocations" is not actually a warning is another indication. If the police pull you over for speeding and give you a ticket, do you complain that you weren't warned when you speed away from them after receiving your ticket and they

3579:

So think about it carefully. You were afraid something was going to happen, which hadn't happened yet. This is something which happens very rarely. Maybe you didn't know the precise requirements for it to happen, but simple common sense should have told you if your original message justified it, then

1894:

You didn't start from the top of the list of contributors to the other discussions, you selected two editors who shared your view in those other discussions; I can see no reason other than bias for selecting those two. Once votestacking has been done, it's hard to undo, which is why it's best to put

850:

their sock puppets as well. They have as you probably know use multiple ip addresses and username sock accounts to bi-pass 3 revert and fool editors and admins. There is currently an ongoing investigation into Mwalla and their sock puppets. If you have any evidence to submit please feel free to do so.

555:

as bullying, and I think bullies tend to continue until someone stands up to them. I am also skeptical of the user name (both in terms of appropriateness and accuracy). If it were just a single false accusation against me, or one instance of edit warring without discussion, I would let it go, but I

287:

You are being deliberately hostile and obtuse. You really cannot aliken someone who removes your irrelevant contribution to someone who burns books. Your paragraph is not lost and as I have said you are welcome to move it to a section where it will be relevant. None of the other character summaries

2664:

Hello TVC 15. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Knowledge (XXG), in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The

1687:

The cause of death is pure speculation and could change tomorrow, the prominant surgeon also specutated that it couls be this or that and got his interview money, this man was quite old, perhaps he just died of old age, wait to find out a medical report this is not a news show, I am just watching it

1649:

Please don't put this content back, we din.t need it, you will notice that Bob Brady is not a medical person so he is reporting something somebody else told him, it is very accusatory towards the doctors and yet adds little to nothing to our detail, he has just died, that is plenty, the claims as to

1552:

for discussing anything but specific changes to this article, and certainly not a forum for repeating your (bordering on stalking) personal attacks against me. If you think that basing your arguments on attacking another editor is an effective way to persuade the wikipedia community, you're going to

1216:

Thanks for the warning, but it is you (Looneymonkey) who are reverting without discussion and bordering on edit war. Each of my edits added new information or sources to the article or attempted to address your criticisms; even my two reverts were accompanied by new sourcing and phrasing to address

1040:

I agree with you about that List. If you look at its history, it was also reduced to show only one side, simply by claiming it was only for those 'primarily' about health care reform. You might want to create another List (with whatever name) to include whatever links you might have. A lot of groups

1621:

Your out-of-sequence placement of your unsigned comment created a misimpression that Sparrowhawk64 was agreeing with your comment, when in fact he disagreed with yours and instead agreed with mine. Usually, when an editor accidentally places a comment out of sequence, they don't object to it being

1529:

The place to discuss that article was on its Talk page, but alas you never did, and now it's gone. By your own admission (or boast), you are practiced at the art of deletion, with thousands of "simple reversions" and deletions of others' contributions. In the specific example of that article, you

361:

I agree it does not affect the merits of the RfA candidate. My comment exposed an express "Quid Pro Quo" between two editors affecting the content of the project page, and I thought it worth mentioning in the General Comments section of the page. However, if you think it belongs on the discussion

166:

and tend to be controversial, and wildly varying in their outcome." I suspect a reason for the "wildly varying" outcomes may be that different people are reading different policies. In any event, I make every effort to comply with the policies that I find on my own, and those that are pointed out

3478:

You don't address the reason for the block(the application of which I concur with) and double down on inflammatory comments through making unfounded accusations against the blocking administrator. I see no benefit to Knowledge (XXG) in unblocking you, and I am declining your request. If you make

3466:

I was blocked for two weeks for answering factually (with links to WP articles and the NY Times) a direct question from an editor on the Talk page of an article. I stated also that I planned to take a break from Knowledge (XXG), so the block was redundant. After my comment on the article Talk page

2368:

and replaced it with Senator Coburn's Op-Ed. An issue with sources on this subject is, PhRMA agreed to support the legislation in an initially secret deal that the White House initially denied and then admitted; PhRMA agreed to spend $ 150 million directly to advertise in favor of the legislation

2346:

analysis of the budget. I will however ask that you do not use anonymous bloggers as sources. And any such instance remaining in the article should be removed. I won't really object(since I am not as informed on the subject as I should be or want to be) to the editorials at this time, and it looks

1312:

Well, OK as to petty, since that aptly describes most of Loonymonkey's reverts (the rest were simply misinformed due to not taking the time to read the whole source), and thus probably most of his/her "contribution" to Knowledge (XXG). Another apt word for it would be, "sad." I have occasionally

1296:

This may be the most ironic 3RR warning I've ever seen. According to Loonymonkey's user page, his/her edit count is "well into the thousands.... The vast majority of these edits are simple reversions.... I don't get involved in edit wars." First of all, do unto others as you would have them do

3590:

Even if the deletion of your comment was unjustified, there is zero reason why you needed to repost it here for an admin to review it, you could have easily included a diff if it was needed. And as I said, you weren't reposting it as part of an unblock appeal anyway. If an admin had reviewed your

3575:

You specifically said "Lest it get deleted from the article Talk page history". So you were clearly thinking of rev-deletion, regardless of whether or not you knew this term. Rev-deletion is something only admins can perform. Even if you didn't specifically know that, you must have known it's not

2306:

Happy birthday :) I didn't intend to disrupt your real-life activities, and will check back in the days ahead to resolve sourcing concerns. I am not affiliated with HotAir so I don't take their reliability personally, I linked there for convenience because they write in common vernacular rather

2129:

I made only one revert, and in fact the use of the revert function was solely for convenience: DD2K had objected to a source and used that objection as a pretext to delete facts; I reverted to restore the facts, but I also added and quoted from a more widely accepted WP:RS, thus addressing DD2K's

1957:

And that's it. You have accused me of abusing admin powers, which a very serious matter ... but you are apparently not prepared to actually make a complaint in the place where such abuse can be remedied, or to withdraw the allegation. If you are not prepared to follow through on your allegation,

302:

I will let the record speak for itself. Long story short, a single paragraph got moved within an article - ok with me. It had been left in its original location by countless editors who made various additions, subtractions, and minor changes to the article and even to the same paragraph. Then,

849:

I understand that you have been trying to reach consensus on paroxetine and that you are a productive editor. When I left that message, it was to try to stop both yourself and Mwalla and their various sockpuppets from warring. I believe if I remember correctly that I also warned Mwalla or one of

598:

Please, TVC, please: Have nothing more to do with Tool. Knowledge (XXG) is huge. Stay away from him/her. It's for your own good. Please dude. You're just going to get a bad name and one day you'll run into the wrong person trying to catch Tool out. Fortunately Deskana is a bit more lenient. But,

2307:

than beltway procedural terminology, but plenty of other sources do say the same thing: the initial CBO estimates assumed "doc fix" wouldn't be enacted, but that assumption was almost immediately disproved, yet certain politicians continued to campaign on it, and then got wiped out at the polls.

3547:

In answer to your question, no, I don't realize that, especially since the same admin deleted it from my Talk page too. To the contrary, I thought it reasonable to put the purported basis for the block into the block section of my Talk page. Moreover, since I had said in the comment that I was

146:

I am careful to read and follow as many WP policies as I can find that appear relevant to a particular situation, but I do not claim to know every policy by heart, and some issues are covered by conflicting policy statements. As communities grow in size and sophistication, policies can change

2485:) and focus on one thing: making WP content as good as possible. Try to avoid getting into arguments over side issues that do not bear directly on the issues being discussed. I pledge to you that I will redouble my efforts to take my own advice and do my part to keep the tension level down. -- 190:

for supplying that link.) Since the episode led me to find these additional statements of policy and principle, I will not repeat the same transgression (or non-transgression), but being human I will inevitably make some other mistake. If you think I have breached a policy somewhere, please

3034:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

249:

Cut out the personal comments, shipmate. It was a messy and irrelevant paragraph and cutting it out makes the page better. Accusations of being a "book burner" are frankly hysterical. You want to discuss Elijah's religious meaning in the text - go ahead, but the film stuff will be

3107:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

2548:

As this is my Talk page, and recognizing your apparent need to have the last word, as demonstrated by your immediate responses to everything without taking the time to research and find sources for anything, I nevertheless invite you courteously to be my guest and have the last word

350:. I did this because it seemed to concern the RfA itself rather than the candidate, and we don't want to distract attention in the discussion from the merits of Enigmaman. Watchers of the discussion, including bureaucrats, will still see the discussion in its new location. Regards, 893:. It says about one 3rd of people who abruptly discontinue antidepressants of benzodiazepines become acutely suicidal. It is with regards to people discontinuing medications due to fears of teratogenicity. Might be worth referencing this article in the antidepressant articles.-- 2996:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 1412: 1898:

If you were concerned that the usual notifications to category creators and tags on the categories were inadequate, you could have discussed that with the nominator ... but the fact that you launched straight into calling in your supporters leads me to believe that per

500:

to anything Tool is interested in? You're both completely separate people and you're never going to have all the same interests, so I'm sure there is another topic of interest that you could edit? :-) Perhaps you and I could one day work on an article together? :-)

264:

Just for the record, the paragraph above related to a question - albeit rhetorical - not an accusation. I do not make accusations without evidence. Also, unlike my critic above, I have never called an editor's comments "hysterical." (Though I note the irony of

2480:

are starting to get tense. I don't think either of us has violated any policies but I'm concerned that we're headed in that direction. I would recommend that you try your hardest to avoid making any assumptions about other editors' intentions or ideologies (see

2027:

First, changing the section heading breaks incoming links, which use the section heading as an anchor. Secondly, it's conventional at CFD to use a section referring to the parent category; there is no need to list the sub-categories in the section heading.

1515:. Also, I didn't delete any article, the community did. Rather than fantasize that I control some massive conspiracy to delete articles you like, maybe you should consider that you might have actually been wrong and all those other people were right. -- 2880:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1309:"disingenuous at best" (what a long-winded way of calling someone a liar!), while allegedly "hurling insults" at him/her "and other editors." When I proved Loonymonkey wrong on every point, (s)he deleted the discussion calling it a "petty argument." 2275:

I am leaving in 10 minutes for my birthday dinner with family, so I will have to get back to you on the specifics. In the mean time, I will say that the analysis from Hotair and linking to the CBO figures is the problem because there should be a

784:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the

2610:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to

2508:, it isn't a talk show or tennis match, and it isn't about "winning" by posting the most comments with the fewest sources. I wish you a very pleasant trip to DC, where I hope you will listen to both sides of the argument in the Supreme Court. 2252:

The quote that I added was definitely from CBO, I copied and pasted it directly from the CBO website to the WP page. If you can please provide a particular statement that you think is WP:OR, I will look for an official quote to replace

1700:

I don't come here as a judge of anything. I am a neutral wikipedia editor who cares less how he died. If and when there is a decent autopsy then I would be the first person adding it to this article, I am not an editor that would add

1250:

prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the

1173:

747:

Thank you for the warning. I will take at least a day off from editing that article, although I disagree with the 3RR count, and have been offering several compromises and discussing on the talk page. I replied on your talk page

3571:

Firstly, let's not conflate deletion and rev-deletion. It was deleted from both places, but it's still in the history. I'm sure you can see that. In fact, I strongly suspect the history is where you found it to re-post it here.

2665:

survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released.

1341: 2337:

Thanks, and not a problem, I got myself involved. But, like you commented somewhere else, I am currently distracted getting ready for an extended vacation. So I'm not going to try and get into the intricacies of the

3135: 3062: 2908: 174:, and am writing here to summarize lessons learned. The policy states, "Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period...." It is defined similarly on another page 2823:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 401:

1) Regardless of T2D4's "bullying" behaviour, he had a valid concern and I acted upon it. There was no "trading" or anything like that involved, I was doing as I would have done if I'd had seen it on the WP:SSP

3576:

something any random editor can do, since you must know you cannot do so. You must also know it's very rare that rev-deletion happens, since it's very rare that there are revisions not visible in the history.

2399:

Please be aware that articles' talkpages are for discussing how to improve the articles, not for musing about amusing but ultimately impossible fantasies concerning the internet proclivities of the articles'

1650:

doctors responsibility are at this moment in time nothing but tabloid type titillation, we don't need to sell newspapers, let the nyt do that and retract later, we are looking at the longer picture, thanks.

415:

against me and/or T2D4 if you wish. I will not stop you. All I will say is this: I have always looked out for the good of the project and have always based my decisions on whether it'll aid the project or

273:. Some people seem to think they own WP, and they delete anything they don't want to read, showing no tolerance for the views of others. In my opinion, that is the digital equivalent of burning books. 2962:

to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is

3119:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 3046:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2892:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1567:

It would be fine with me to move the three paragraphs above to my Talk page. You wrote two of them, so please let me know if you object. As for "stalking," please look up the meaning of the word.

1936:

Instead of making accusations against each other, I suggest we simply put the same notice onto each of the user pages of the editors who participated in the liberal & progressive discussions.

408:

3) If you find T2D4's behaviour to be an offense to your person then I suggest that you avoid all contact with him. This is the best route as it prevents any further aggrevation on either side.

398:

Hello TVC, I actually am sincere in my apology for any inconvenience my "investigation" may have caused. I am a man of my word and I hope that you will accept that. In order of what I remember:

1400:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 599:

just, come on, man, just back away from it. If Tool is a bad user he/she will get caught out okay? You don't need to try and bring them to their knees yourself. Let's just move on :-) No more

2193:

and editorials are not permitted for inclusion on articles. Especially controversial article such as the one here. I suggest you take your suggested edits to the talk page, and self-revert.

2963: 2959: 2082:

states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the

307:, who had never written anything for the article or contributed to it in any way, decided to delete the paragraph, claiming not to understand its relevance. As has been noted elsewhere, 2612: 1781:

on the Talk page you then changed the article, which is what made me think the matter might require a different forum. Whatever - we can discuss further on the Talk page if you prefer.

2500:

Thanks, but I simply quoted what you had written. I wasn't trying to upset you, although that appears to have been your reaction on seeing you had contradicted yourself. WP is about

3587:. And you said you were storing it offline lest it gets rev-deleted here too, so this possibility occurred to you, and there's actually no real reason why you needed to post it here. 1411:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

159: 1910:

in asking you to desist. Abuse of admin power is a serious matter, and should not go unchallenged. Since you believe that it has happened here, I urge you promptly report it at

1622:

moved, but I will keep your unusual ideas concerning placement in mind. Meanwhile, since you've moved your comment back to its original location, you might enjoy this website

347: 3598:

If you want to get unblocked, consider how what you're saying is coming across to me someone who is not an admin and has never interacted with you AFAIK. Either you lack the

1764:

We are nice people so consider not putting so stern an edit summary like "take it to dispute resolution" in the Murtha article. There is no dispute. We're all nice people!

1495: 3258: 2166: 1041:

are for 'reform', just different kinds of reform and that's not necessarily their only purpose for existence. I would also suggest you submit links you feel are relevant to

522:

Thanks for the information and the invitation to work on an article together, which I would like to do. I have also been editing completely different articles. Regarding

1831:, you will see that it specifically permits the notices that I've started posting. I haven't had time to finish, but I'll stop for the moment and reply on the topic page. 2760:

Once BLP has been raised, material should NOT be restored without a consensus to do so. Please leave it out and I'll discuss wit you and anyone else who cares to comment

664:

So, having done my part to reduce bullying on WP, I moved on to other things. I appreciate sincerely the time and effort of all those who helped in resolving the matter.

493:. Somewhere in there it says that users may remove whatever they wish from their talk page; it's basically just another way of showing that they have acknowledged it :-) 1599:. I place my comment in the appropriate place to reply to another editor, and indented it beyond the normal flow to indicate that it had been placed out of sequence. -- 195:

and that your knowledge of that particular policy exceeds mine. Being human, I cannot hope to make zero mistakes, but I do try never to make the same mistake twice.

731:

You have violated 3rr on this article. This is a warning: reverting again will result in your being blocked. Discuss the article on the talk page, do not edit war.

980:

Thanks for letting me know, although the accusation is ironic, coming from you. I also think your indignation is unjustified, but I will discuss the substance on

343: 1243: 1166: 3178:; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to 2681:

You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated

851: 1645:

According to longtime friend and fellow Pennsylvania Democratic Representative Bob Brady, Murtha's large intestine was damaged during the laparoscopic surgery

3583:

And definitely it should be enough to tell you that re-posting it was clearly wrong, regardless of whether it would be rev-deleted. Knowledge (XXG) is not a

3513:

template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

1004: 222:. On consideration of it, I deemed it inappropriate enough that I deleted it speedily. So, the "vandalism" in question was by that other user, not by you. 537:

discussion. Also of course the context of the false accusation of sock puppetry against me, placed not through normal channels but rather as a QPQ as if

2366: 2182: 2067: 155: 3221: 2226:. The IBD reference would be acceptable, except that it does not back up anything you added. Linking to a CBO report and giving your own analysis is 25:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

3525:

from the article talk page history so you need to post it on your own talk page while blocked, right? While you're given wide latitude in managing

710:

Thanks for the FYI :) It looks like edits crossing in the ether, probably on both pages; as you were typing this, I was replying on the Talk page.

1042: 3498: 3339: 2977: 3000:

This is just a standard notification, though please do note that you've violated the 1RR restriction in place on the Executive Order article.

2682: 2040: 1970: 1926: 1865: 1816: 1611: 1360:. I'm not watchlisting here, so if you have questions, feel free to ask there or at my talk page. Thanks for your time. (P.S. Your edit to 1021:

Thanks - we all miss things from time to time - the edits are moving towards accuracy, and the Wiki benefits from complementary observations.

75: 2446: 94:

Ugh. Another admin moved "housing" somewhere else and deleted it, so I was left with a redirect to nowhere. I'll get on fixing this pronto.

3212:

to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an

3149: 3076: 2922: 2848: 572:

had reverted against. (That version had been supported by at least three of the four editors discussing it, and I have since restored it.)

3370:. Please do not misuse your talk page while blocked again, or access to it will be revoked. It is to be used for an unblock request only. 1003:

I apologize for missing part of what USA today's editorial staff was asserting in its 2004 editorial. Please see my follow-up comment at

478:. Thousands of these are given out every single day by admins and non-admins alike. It's how Knowledge (XXG) deals with problems, e.g. a 3421: 2156: 2121: 1664:

Respectfully, you're not the sole judge of what "we" need or don't need. I'm not trying to sell newspapers, and I've added a link to

2955: 1375: 180:, example 4.) The incident involved a disagreement in which the other side expressly refused to discuss or debate (for example here 1778:

Thanks - I didn't mean to offend, and I'll respect your concern about edit summaries. I was confused though that after posting this

1474: 2985: 2083: 1364:, which was merged into this page, was months ago, but we haven't had much participation in the survey so far this week.) - Dank ( 1256: 1179: 2788:

No, because I raised a new issue, as described in my edit summary. Please don't restore, let's talk on the article talk page, ok?

556:

think the situation involves wider issues. Nevertheless, I appreciate your comments as to how specific examples may be perceived.

2738: 2714: 2442: 2435: 127:

Sorry, miscounted. If you revert again, you will violate the WP:3RR. Congratulations, you've officially gotten under my skin.

49: 3145: 3072: 2968:

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means

2918: 2844: 1397: 1379: 3217: 3183: 3128: 3055: 2901: 2099: 802: 34: 2103: 1357: 1252: 1247: 1175: 1170: 786: 781: 636:

since more than 20 edits ago, and had considered the matter resolved. To sum up, the final determinations were as follows:

68:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out

2234:. Quoting the CBO is fine and great, if you are quoting what they actually say and not providing your own take on figures. 2670: 2981: 1393: 3416: 1769: 1745:, and a longtime friend of Murtha who also happens to be a member of Congress. So, it is notable, and reliably sourced. 1742: 1669: 3394: 3312: 3227: 2993: 2835:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2109: 1733: 1274: 1197: 886: 792: 54: 3140: 3067: 2913: 2840: 2793: 2765: 648:(2) Also, it turned out that an "alternative account" belonging to the same user had already been banned indefinitely. 269:

doing so in the context of decrying personal comments!) The specific context can be found on the discussion page for

3388: 2989: 2969: 3393:

Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the

1853:

to post them to a list of editors who you think will agree with you. What you were engaged in is votestacking. --

1349: 566: 3005: 2455: 2036: 1966: 1922: 1861: 1812: 1607: 132: 3332: 3213: 3171: 2973: 2423: 2095: 2079: 2062: 1333: 827:

Thank you for the detailed warning. Just to be clear, this is the same disagreement already addressed above by

797:. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a 657:'s false accusation, and the suspicion that might otherwise have hurt my reputation was instead formally closed. 419:

5) If you require any assistance whatsoever anywhere on Knowledge (XXG), feel free to contact me. Best regards,

29: 22: 1043:

http://www.dmoz.org/Regional/North_America/United_States/Society_and_Culture/Politics/Issues/Health_Care_Reform

903: 864: 815: 3116: 3043: 2889: 2439:

where we are working to expand, improve, and standardize all articles related to Tijuana on Knowledge (XXG).

2075: 1958:

then it's no more than a personal attack, so I'm not going to waste time discussing this with you further. --

61: 1765: 1736: 649: 3599: 2942:

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge (XXG). It does

2207:

I quoted from CBO directly, and linked to the CBO report. Are you saying the CBO is not a reliable source?

1507:

territory here. Let's try to keep the discussion centered on actual changes to the article. That means no

1401: 65: 2789: 2761: 2722: 2692: 2405: 2222:

That's not what you've done. The majority of the information you posted was from Hotair, definitely not a

1050: 971: 692:

Hi, TVC 15. Regarding our respective edits of 12 January 2009, I made some comments for your attention at

541:

knew it to be false but hoped to get somewhere anyway (or to intimidate me by implying special influence).

293: 255: 3187: 3179: 2836: 2087: 1549: 1504: 1345: 1260: 1183: 798: 69: 3266: 3243: 1558: 1520: 1287: 1207: 1132: 1107: 1081: 362:

page instead, I have no objection. To make a political analogy, it is like the US Senate nomination of

1436:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1361: 1238: 1161: 1012: 925: 773: 490: 177: 44: 2280:

doing the research and analysis. But I will get back to you before I leave for vacation December 4th.

3435: 3001: 2628: 2029: 1959: 1915: 1854: 1805: 1709: 1655: 1600: 1441: 967: 701: 697: 696:

and the subsequent topic. This note is just an fyi, in case you're not watching that page. Thanks, --

128: 81: 3584: 3526: 3522: 3103: 3030: 2876: 2858: 2812: 2803: 2620: 2616: 2071: 1951: 1846: 1828: 1801: 831:, not a separate event, and I have not edited the article since being warned. As noted in reply to 654: 640: 633: 569: 562: 552: 545: 538: 530: 523: 475: 3609: 3534: 3190:, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. 1730: 1727: 894: 855: 806: 3366:

For refactoring the provocations onto your user talk page, I have modified your block duration to

3112: 3039: 2885: 2832: 2816: 1353: 1301:

rather than insulting my integrity. The specific conflict arose regarding a quoted sentence from

1008: 658: 479: 3602:

to edit wikipedia, or you're just making stuff up and are the one pursing a personal motivation.

2584: 2531: 2490: 1302: 693: 1413:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Obama administration health care proposal (2nd nomination)

600: 534: 311:

seems to enjoy scrapping; one might imagine a minor tempest in search of teapots. Based on how

2365:

AOK - I've added more quotes from CBO; I also removed the pseudonymous Allahpundit/HotAir link

1281:

Rather than edit-war, try to get consensus on the talk page before adding this material again.

2972:

administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the

2718: 2687: 2401: 2153: 2118: 1046: 960:, especially the last sentence, to be highly insulting and incivil. I've started a thread on 737: 609: 507: 454: 425: 312: 308: 304: 289: 266: 251: 3124: 3051: 2897: 2828: 2820: 1900: 1508: 183: 3507: 3484: 3345: 3262: 3239: 1554: 1516: 1422:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1283: 1203: 1126: 1101: 1075: 533:'s threatening a result beyond what (s)he was authorized to deliver, and as a substitute to 235: 187: 3235: 3127:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3120: 3054:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 3047: 2900:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2893: 2831:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 2824: 2576: 2482: 2231: 1985: 1981: 1911: 1512: 1433: 1423: 1416: 1405: 1298: 981: 961: 483: 445: 440:(people don't often like to read large paragraphs) summary, backed by diffs (evidence is a 412: 192: 171: 163: 154:

alerted me to a special policy governing category tags for religion or sexual orientation (

118: 3303: 3209: 2624: 2575:

Thank you. Then I will take it that your answer to my question is no. I'm going to add an

1880:

and you reacted after only two, so you can't honestly call that excessive or votestacking.

1804:, please stop canvassing editors who you think will agree with you at a CFD discussion. -- 1705: 1651: 1463: 1456: 1437: 367: 122: 3521:

You realise it's completely ridiculous to suggest you're afraid something is going to be

3328: 3324: 2505: 2348: 2277: 2227: 2223: 2190: 2186: 1741:. THEIR sources include the hospital where Rep. Murtha died, the president-elect of the 1720: 1268: 1264: 1191: 1187: 921: 2165:

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at

225:

Put simply, deleting the page was cleaning up the vandalism created by that other user.

3605: 3530: 2356: 2285: 2239: 2198: 1739: 1365: 882: 386: 351: 316: 2935: 2441:

If you would like more information on what needs to and can be done, please visit the

1392:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

1232: 1155: 768: 2733: 2580: 2527: 2486: 1426:

template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

385:

Aye, glad we can agree, and good luck with resolving the issues surrounding the QPQ.

363: 151: 39: 1340:, and you're invited to participate. Monthly changes to this page are available at 2150: 2115: 832: 828: 733: 604: 502: 449: 420: 95: 3094: 3021: 2867: 3549: 3480: 3399: 3175: 2775: 2742: 2550: 2509: 2370: 2308: 2254: 2208: 2189:

policy. The only RS you listed(IBD) does not support your edits. Hotair, blogs,

2131: 1989: 1937: 1881: 1832: 1782: 1746: 1673: 1626: 1568: 1535: 1314: 1218: 1022: 985: 938: 836: 749: 711: 665: 573: 548:

suggested that would be the basis for my creating an RfC, but I never said that.

482:

is given 4 warnings (usually) by a non-admin and then they report the vandal to

371: 320: 274: 230: 219: 196: 158:, third paragraph). I have since found a somewhat conflicting policy governing 3479:

another, it should only address the reason for the block and your own conduct.

1385: 2086:

to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains

1481: 929: 890: 777: 725: 1595:

Please do not move other editors comments around in a discussion, as you did

3371: 3358: 2352: 2281: 2235: 2194: 1531: 270: 3327:, including but not limited to highly inflammatory provocations. Also, for 162:. The latter policy page notes, "These discussions occasionally pop up on 2445:. If you have any questions, please feel free join the discussion on our 1263:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

1186:

among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek

3338:

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the

3287: 379: 356: 3342:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: 3198:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;

3131:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

3058:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2904:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

2169:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

1895:

a rapid stop to it rather than try to deal with consequences afterwards.

920:

Hi, you were previously involved in a discussion about merging 3RR into

2819:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

2646: 2526:

How about turning off the snark for a change? Think you can do that? --

2430: 1954:; the relevant section is helpfully labelled "excessive cross-posting". 1067: 1060: 2351:. In any case, I'm going back to being distracted. Have a good day. 568:), where so far all the comments appear to support the version that 3613: 3557: 3538: 3488: 3374: 3361: 3270: 3247: 3153: 3080: 3009: 2926: 2852: 2797: 2783: 2769: 2750: 2726: 2698: 2632: 2623:

to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.

2588: 2558: 2535: 2517: 2494: 2466: 2409: 2378: 2360: 2316: 2289: 2262: 2243: 2216: 2202: 2159: 2139: 2124: 2045: 1997: 1975: 1945: 1931: 1889: 1870: 1840: 1821: 1790: 1773: 1754: 1713: 1681: 1659: 1634: 1616: 1576: 1562: 1543: 1524: 1484: 1470: 1445: 1369: 1322: 1291: 1226: 1211: 1141: 1116: 1090: 1054: 1030: 1016: 993: 975: 946: 932: 910: 871: 844: 822: 757: 742: 719: 705: 673: 611: 581: 509: 456: 427: 391: 328: 297: 282: 259: 239: 204: 136: 84: 2477: 2339: 1305:, which Loonymonkey falsely accused me of quoting out of context, 436:

Hi TVC, an easier and better method might be to post a relatively

1723:(which are not tabloids). As of now, the linked sources include 1719:

We don't know if the surgeon was paid, and the text reflects the

1623: 405:

2) I have not done anything wrong, sir, and neither have you :-)

214:

Sorry if seeing the log message startled you. What happened is,

3134:

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review

3061:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

2907:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

2078:

with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the

2024:

to the section heading of the CFD discussion, for two reasons.

3208:

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's

2946:

imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

2343: 1724: 1665: 1342:

WP:Update/1/Conduct policy changes, July 2009 to December 2009

1336:

policy will be featured in the Policy Report in next Monday's

1255:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 1178:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 72:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place 1845:

A limited number of neutrally-worded notices is permitted by

1553:

find nothing but disappointment. Just cool it and move on. --

3379: 3302: 2645: 1908:

mentioned at CfD that you believe I was abusing admin powers

1477:

at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

1455: 1384: 170:

In contrast, I experienced a 1-day block for complying with

3261:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.

2774:

There is consensus to include it. Please stop deleting it.

2102:. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary 561:

Meanwhile, the AC article may work out happily after all.

125:. To avoid admin action, please revert your own last edit. 3580:

you re-posting it on your talk page would likely as well.

370:'s alleged "Quid Pro Quo" offers involving the nomination. 80:

before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -

3495:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please

643:'s continued conduct drew a final warning for incivility. 160:

Knowledge (XXG):Categorization/Gender, race and sexuality

3515:

Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

2613:

Public opinion of same-sex marriage in the United States

1668:

that quoted a prominent surgeon (president-elect of the

1344:, and it may help to look at previous policy surveys at 156:

Knowledge (XXG):Biographies of living persons#Categories

3449: 3445: 3439: 3430: 3426: 3412: 3408: 3404: 3115:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

3042:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2888:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

2676:

Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts.

2178: 2146: 2021: 1907: 1878: 1876: 1779: 1596: 1310: 965: 957: 644: 471: 339: 182:]). The recommended response to such situations is to 1005:

Talk:Health_care_reform_in_the_United_States#USA_Today

496:

3) Perhaps you could try just one more time to edit a

3259:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

2429:

I've noticed your contributions on pages relating to

2167:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

1688:

now, some guy on abc world using a lot of words like

1267:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 1190:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 3387:

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an

2615:. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please 1980:

Following your instruction above, I started reading

529:(1) I agree warnings are common, my reaction was to 338:

Greetings TVC 15. I hope you don't mind, but I have

1496:

Talk:Health care reform debate in the United States

544:(2) Users can of course edit their own Talk pages; 315:has insulted others and their work, including even 3331:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 3203:Do not edit war even if you believe you are right. 1849:, but it does not permit you to post lots of them 694:Talk:Mega_Millions#advertised_value_vs._real_value 344:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Enigmaman 2 2811:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 2092:do not edit war even if you believe you are right 1259:to work towards wording and content that gains a 1182:to work towards wording and content that gains a 632:Thanks and already done: I hadn't even mentioned 2149:DD2K about it at the same time as I warned you. 852:Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Mwalla 3595:pull you over again and you lose your licence? 1121:I did not revert you, I moved the information. 2984:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 1244:Health care reform debate in the United States 1167:Health care reform debate in the United States 1914:to seek the opinion of uninvolved editors. -- 1332:A summary of the community's comments on our 8: 3234:Please note that you are not subscribing to 1875:The notices were brief and neutrally worded, 486:to be blocked. So don't worry about that :-) 2709:Just to let you know -- Missing Wikipedians 3220:. In some cases, it may be appropriate to 3174:according to the reverts you have made on 2731:Thanks. As described in the article from 2183:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2173:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2068:Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act 2066:according to the reverts you have made on 1242:according to the reverts you have made on 1165:according to the reverts you have made on 776:according to the reverts you have made on 653:(3) In contrast, I was cleared (again) of 60:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 3170:You currently appear to be engaged in an 2060:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1462:Hello, TVC 15. You have new messages at 1398:Obama administration health care proposal 1380:Obama administration health care proposal 1236:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1159:You currently appear to be engaged in an 772:You currently appear to be engaged in an 1356:. There's a little more information at 1271:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 1194:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 3280: 2950:Please carefully read this information: 1703:speculative titillating headline claims 1432:This is an automatic notification by a 489:2) Re: Him removing a 3RR warning. See 3288:http://www.economist.com/node/10789354 2157:Complaints and constructive criticism? 2122:Complaints and constructive criticism? 1358:WT:Edit warring#Signpost Policy Report 1350:WT:CIVILITY#Policy Report for Signpost 2090:among editors. If unsuccessful, then 228:Sorry if that caused any confusion. — 7: 3224:. If you engage in an edit war, you 3104:2018 Arbitration Committee elections 3031:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 2877:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 801:among editors. If necessary, pursue 551:(3) Other users have also described 3257:There is currently a discussion at 3117:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 3044:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2890:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 2739:Knowledge (XXG):Missing Wikipedians 2715:Knowledge (XXG):Missing Wikipedians 1903:, you were engaged in votestacking. 30:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 3088:ArbCom 2018 election voter message 3015:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 2185:do not conform to Knowledge (XXG) 467:Oh, and TVC, a couple more points: 319:, I seem to have fared quite well. 14: 3222:request temporary page protection 2837:review the candidates' statements 565:added it to the BLP noticeboard ( 366:: his merits are not affected by 3252: 3165: 3093: 3020: 2934: 2866: 2641: 2605: 2422: 2094:. Post a request for help at an 2055: 1231: 1154: 767: 474:diff you showed me is a generic 3138:and submit your choices on the 3065:and submit your choices on the 926:WT:3RR#Merge 3RR into Edit War? 334:Your comment at Enigmaman's RfA 218:user—not you—created a page at 3182:with others, to avoid editing 2843:. For the Election committee, 2813:Arbitration Committee election 2804:ArbCom elections are now open! 2727:14:59, 29 September 2013 (UTC) 2467:02:57, 13 September 2011 (UTC) 1346:WT:SOCK#Interview for Signpost 1031:19:42, 15 September 2009 (UTC) 1017:22:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC) 137:09:37, 29 September 2008 (UTC) 1: 3614:11:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3558:07:16, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3539:06:47, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3489:10:19, 22 December 2019 (UTC) 3375:15:11, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 3362:05:53, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 3316:from editing for a period of 3271:05:37, 21 December 2019 (UTC) 3154:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC) 3101:Hello, TVC 15. Voting in the 3028:Hello, TVC 15. Voting in the 3010:01:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC) 2927:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 2874:Hello, TVC 15. Voting in the 2853:13:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 2579:for our 3 little impasses. -- 2106:. If edit warring continues, 2046:01:13, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1998:02:23, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1976:00:51, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1946:00:43, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1932:00:39, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1890:00:27, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1871:00:24, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1841:00:12, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1822:00:01, 14 February 2010 (UTC) 1791:00:48, 12 February 2010 (UTC) 1774:23:00, 11 February 2010 (UTC) 1755:02:31, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 1714:01:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 1682:01:35, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 1660:01:25, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 1370:02:42, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 1323:20:56, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1292:07:34, 16 December 2009 (UTC) 1257:discuss controversial changes 1180:discuss controversial changes 1142:10:33, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1117:01:39, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 1091:01:30, 23 November 2009 (UTC) 329:23:30, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 298:15:32, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 283:03:59, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 260:00:08, 13 November 2008 (UTC) 3248:19:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC) 3081:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 2756:I suggest you stop right now 2751:18:34, 25 October 2013 (UTC) 2433:. We encourage you to join 2410:05:54, 9 December 2010 (UTC) 2379:06:45, 4 December 2010 (UTC) 2361:14:58, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2317:01:07, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2290:01:01, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2263:00:36, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2244:00:31, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2217:00:14, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2203:00:10, 3 December 2010 (UTC) 2160:23:59, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 2140:23:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 2125:23:53, 2 December 2010 (UTC) 1743:American College of Surgeons 1670:American College of Surgeons 1635:04:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 1617:04:43, 8 February 2010 (UTC) 1577:23:57, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 1563:21:10, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 1544:20:32, 22 January 2010 (UTC) 1525:06:49, 21 January 2010 (UTC) 1503:You're kind of veering into 1485:02:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1471:02:46, 18 January 2010 (UTC) 1446:01:07, 12 January 2010 (UTC) 1227:07:33, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 1212:06:02, 7 December 2009 (UTC) 1055:01:16, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 854:. Happy editing wikipedia.-- 845:22:30, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 823:22:18, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 758:22:04, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 743:21:46, 15 January 2009 (UTC) 720:22:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 706:22:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 674:07:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 612:06:15, 16 January 2009 (UTC) 582:21:57, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 510:21:33, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 498:completely different article 457:21:28, 14 January 2009 (UTC) 428:04:48, 11 January 2009 (UTC) 392:22:50, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 380:22:36, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 357:21:49, 10 January 2009 (UTC) 205:23:34, 13 October 2008 (UTC) 50:How to write a great article 3391:, who declined the request. 2911:and submit your choices on 2839:and submit your choices on 2713:You have been mentioned at 1988:is the place to start, yes? 1406:What Knowledge (XXG) is not 1396:. The nominated article is 1354:WT:U#Signpost Policy Report 994:00:18, 20 August 2009 (UTC) 976:23:12, 19 August 2009 (UTC) 240:03:58, 2 October 2008 (UTC) 3635: 3146:MediaWiki message delivery 3073:MediaWiki message delivery 2974:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 2919:MediaWiki message delivery 2909:the candidates' statements 2845:MediaWiki message delivery 2633:02:11, 16 March 2012 (UTC) 2617:repair or replace the link 1402:Knowledge (XXG):Notability 872:19:16, 22 March 2009 (UTC) 411:4) You are free to file a 105:at 08:53, January 22, 2008 3499:guide to appealing blocks 3340:guide to appealing blocks 3333:make useful contributions 2798:01:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 2784:01:48, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 2770:01:46, 2 April 2014 (UTC) 2699:01:42, 6 April 2012 (UTC) 2638:Dispute resolution survey 2589:20:16, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2559:20:11, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2536:20:08, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2518:19:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2495:19:29, 6 March 2012 (UTC) 2114:without further notice. 1419:with four tildes (~~~~). 911:01:19, 6 April 2009 (UTC) 85:10:31, 20 June 2007 (UTC) 70:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 3553: 3188:try to reach a consensus 2779: 2746: 2554: 2513: 2374: 2312: 2258: 2212: 2154:Suggestions/complements? 2135: 2119:Suggestions/complements? 1993: 1941: 1885: 1836: 1786: 1750: 1677: 1630: 1548:Again, this talkpage is 1318: 1307:grossly misrepresenting, 1222: 1026: 989: 947:21:39, 23 May 2009 (UTC) 942: 933:13:17, 21 May 2009 (UTC) 916:Merge 3RR into Edit War? 883:Benzodiazepine#Pregnancy 840: 753: 715: 669: 577: 375: 342:the comment you made to 324: 278: 200: 3214:appropriate noticeboard 2960:discretionary sanctions 2476:TVC 15, our debates on 2096:appropriate noticeboard 1737:Pittsburgh Post Gazette 1640:According to his friend 1066:I have answered at the 210:Deletion of User:TVC 15 184:request page protection 3384: 3307: 2650: 2504:and writing, based on 2395:Concerning Talk:Earwig 1530:first reduced it to a 1460: 1389: 603:with Tool, right? :-) 3436:change block settings 3383: 3350:Your reason here ~~~~ 3306: 3113:Arbitration Committee 3040:Arbitration Committee 2978:standards of behavior 2956:Arbitration Committee 2886:Arbitration Committee 2859:ArbCom Elections 2016 2817:Arbitration Committee 2655:Dispute Resolution – 2649: 1459: 1424:articles for deletion 1388: 1045:- synergy works. :-) 2986:editing restrictions 1415:. Please be sure to 964:about your behavior. 924:; please comment at 2821:arbitration process 2436:WikiProject Tijuana 2415:WikiProject Tijuana 2016:CfD section heading 1731:The Washington Post 1513:no personal attacks 789:. If you continue, 333: 21:Hello, TVC 15, and 3385: 3325:disruptive editing 3308: 3218:dispute resolution 3129:arbitration policy 3056:arbitration policy 2902:arbitration policy 2861:: Voting now open! 2833:arbitration policy 2651: 2100:dispute resolution 1766:Suomi Finland 2009 1494:removed here from 1475:remove this notice 1461: 1417:sign your comments 1390: 1303:The New York Times 1265:dispute resolution 1188:dispute resolution 803:dispute resolution 117:You just violated 35:How to edit a page 2790:Two kinds of pork 2762:Two kinds of pork 2706: 2705: 2701: 2453: 2452: 2228:original research 2191:original research 2151:Signed by Barts1a 2130:stated objection. 2116:Signed by Barts1a 2080:three-revert rule 2072:edit disruptively 2044: 1974: 1930: 1869: 1820: 1615: 1464:Jayjg's talk page 1299:assume good faith 1253:three-revert rule 1248:three-revert rule 1176:three-revert rule 1171:three-revert rule 1140: 1115: 1089: 1036:healthcare reform 787:three-revert rule 782:three-revert rule 193:assume good faith 186:. (My thanks to 142:policy compliance 107: 3626: 3512: 3506: 3455: 3453: 3442: 3424: 3422:deleted contribs 3382: 3353: 3290: 3285: 3256: 3255: 3193:Points to note: 3169: 3168: 3097: 3024: 2938: 2870: 2697: 2695: 2690: 2680: 2642: 2609: 2608: 2464: 2460: 2426: 2419: 2418: 2349:reliable sources 2187:reliable sources 2059: 2058: 2035: 2032: 2020:I have reverted 1965: 1962: 1950:No. Try reading 1921: 1918: 1860: 1857: 1811: 1808: 1721:reliable sources 1606: 1603: 1478: 1246:. Note that the 1235: 1169:. Note that the 1158: 1139: 1135: 1129: 1122: 1114: 1110: 1104: 1097: 1088: 1084: 1078: 1071: 937:Thanks - done :) 908: 900: 897: 869: 861: 858: 820: 812: 809: 780:. Note that the 771: 607: 505: 452: 423: 389: 354: 346:to the talkpage 96: 79: 3634: 3633: 3629: 3628: 3627: 3625: 3624: 3623: 3518: 3510: 3504: 3503:, then use the 3492: 3469: 3443: 3433: 3419: 3402: 3395:blocking policy 3380: 3356: 3355: 3343: 3336: 3300: 3295: 3294: 3293: 3286: 3282: 3253: 3166: 3163: 3158: 3157: 3098: 3090: 3085: 3084: 3025: 3017: 3002:Volunteer Marek 2998: 2997: 2958:has authorised 2939: 2931: 2930: 2914:the voting page 2871: 2863: 2841:the voting page 2807: 2758: 2711: 2693: 2688: 2686: 2673:to participate. 2660: 2640: 2606: 2603: 2474: 2461: 2456: 2417: 2397: 2278:reliable source 2224:reliable source 2175: 2104:page protection 2056: 2053: 2030: 2018: 1960: 1916: 1855: 1806: 1798: 1762: 1642: 1601: 1593: 1591:Moving comments 1505:talk page forum 1492: 1479: 1468: 1453: 1383: 1334:WP:Edit warring 1330: 1269:page protection 1192:page protection 1152: 1133: 1127: 1123: 1108: 1102: 1098: 1096:Replied again. 1082: 1076: 1072: 1064: 1038: 1001: 954: 918: 904: 898: 895: 879: 877:Important study 865: 859: 856: 816: 810: 807: 765: 729: 690: 605: 503: 450: 421: 387: 368:Rod Blagojevich 352: 336: 247: 212: 144: 129:Gabrielthursday 123:Anderson Cooper 114: 101: 92: 82:Ta bu shi da yu 73: 55:Manual of Style 12: 11: 5: 3632: 3630: 3622: 3621: 3620: 3619: 3618: 3617: 3563: 3562: 3561: 3560: 3542: 3541: 3527:your talk page 3523:WP:rev-deleted 3493: 3476: 3472:Decline reason 3464: 3460:Request reason 3457: 3378: 3337: 3310:You have been 3309: 3301: 3299: 3296: 3292: 3291: 3279: 3278: 3274: 3232: 3206: 3205: 3200: 3162: 3159: 3136:the candidates 3099: 3092: 3091: 3089: 3086: 3063:the candidates 3026: 3019: 3018: 3016: 3013: 2980:, or relevant 2940: 2933: 2932: 2872: 2865: 2864: 2862: 2856: 2810: 2806: 2801: 2757: 2754: 2710: 2707: 2704: 2703: 2678: 2675: 2662: 2653: 2639: 2636: 2602: 2599: 2598: 2597: 2596: 2595: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2566: 2565: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2561: 2541: 2540: 2539: 2538: 2521: 2520: 2473: 2470: 2451: 2450: 2440: 2427: 2416: 2413: 2396: 2393: 2392: 2391: 2390: 2389: 2388: 2387: 2386: 2385: 2384: 2383: 2382: 2381: 2326: 2325: 2324: 2323: 2322: 2321: 2320: 2319: 2297: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2292: 2268: 2267: 2266: 2265: 2247: 2246: 2174: 2171: 2163: 2162: 2052: 2049: 2017: 2014: 2013: 2012: 2011: 2010: 2009: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1955: 1904: 1896: 1797: 1796:Canvassing CfD 1794: 1761: 1758: 1717: 1716: 1641: 1638: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1586: 1585: 1584: 1583: 1582: 1581: 1580: 1579: 1491: 1488: 1469:Message added 1467: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1382: 1378:nomination of 1373: 1329: 1326: 1151: 1148: 1147: 1146: 1145: 1144: 1063: 1058: 1037: 1034: 1000: 997: 953: 950: 917: 914: 885:. Here is the 878: 875: 764: 761: 728: 723: 689: 686: 685: 684: 683: 682: 681: 680: 679: 678: 677: 676: 662: 661: 660: 651: 646: 621: 620: 619: 618: 617: 616: 615: 614: 589: 588: 587: 586: 585: 584: 559: 558: 557: 549: 542: 515: 514: 513: 512: 494: 487: 468: 462: 461: 460: 459: 431: 430: 417: 409: 406: 403: 399: 395: 394: 335: 332: 317:Rowan Atkinson 246: 243: 211: 208: 143: 140: 113: 110: 99: 91: 88: 66:sign your name 58: 57: 52: 47: 42: 37: 32: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3631: 3616: 3615: 3611: 3607: 3603: 3601: 3600:WP:Competence 3596: 3592: 3588: 3586: 3581: 3577: 3573: 3569: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3565: 3564: 3559: 3555: 3551: 3546: 3545: 3544: 3543: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3519: 3517: 3516: 3509: 3502: 3500: 3491: 3490: 3486: 3482: 3475: 3473: 3468: 3463: 3461: 3456: 3451: 3447: 3441: 3437: 3432: 3428: 3423: 3418: 3414: 3413:global blocks 3410: 3409:active blocks 3406: 3401: 3396: 3392: 3390: 3389:administrator 3377: 3376: 3373: 3369: 3364: 3363: 3360: 3351: 3347: 3341: 3334: 3330: 3326: 3322: 3319: 3315: 3314: 3305: 3297: 3289: 3284: 3281: 3277: 3273: 3272: 3268: 3264: 3260: 3250: 3249: 3245: 3241: 3238: 3237: 3231: 3230:from editing. 3229: 3223: 3219: 3215: 3211: 3204: 3201: 3199: 3196: 3195: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3185: 3181: 3177: 3173: 3161:December 2019 3160: 3156: 3155: 3151: 3147: 3143: 3142: 3137: 3132: 3130: 3126: 3122: 3118: 3114: 3109: 3106: 3105: 3096: 3087: 3083: 3082: 3078: 3074: 3070: 3069: 3064: 3059: 3057: 3053: 3049: 3045: 3041: 3036: 3033: 3032: 3023: 3014: 3012: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2995: 2991: 2987: 2983: 2979: 2975: 2971: 2967: 2965: 2961: 2957: 2952: 2951: 2947: 2945: 2937: 2929: 2928: 2924: 2920: 2916: 2915: 2910: 2905: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2882: 2879: 2878: 2869: 2860: 2857: 2855: 2854: 2850: 2846: 2842: 2838: 2834: 2830: 2826: 2822: 2818: 2814: 2805: 2802: 2800: 2799: 2795: 2791: 2786: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2772: 2771: 2767: 2763: 2755: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2740: 2736: 2735: 2734:The Economist 2729: 2728: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2708: 2702: 2700: 2696: 2691: 2684: 2683:research page 2677: 2674: 2672: 2669:Please click 2666: 2661: 2659: 2658: 2657:Survey Invite 2648: 2644: 2643: 2637: 2635: 2634: 2630: 2626: 2622: 2618: 2614: 2600: 2590: 2586: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2573: 2572: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2568: 2567: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2547: 2546: 2545: 2544: 2543: 2542: 2537: 2533: 2529: 2525: 2524: 2523: 2522: 2519: 2515: 2511: 2507: 2503: 2499: 2498: 2497: 2496: 2492: 2488: 2484: 2479: 2471: 2469: 2468: 2465: 2463: 2459: 2448: 2444: 2438: 2437: 2432: 2428: 2425: 2421: 2420: 2414: 2412: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2394: 2380: 2376: 2372: 2367: 2364: 2363: 2362: 2358: 2354: 2350: 2345: 2341: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2329: 2328: 2327: 2318: 2314: 2310: 2305: 2304: 2303: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2291: 2287: 2283: 2279: 2274: 2273: 2272: 2271: 2270: 2269: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2248: 2245: 2241: 2237: 2233: 2229: 2225: 2221: 2220: 2219: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2205: 2204: 2200: 2196: 2192: 2188: 2184: 2180: 2172: 2170: 2168: 2161: 2158: 2155: 2152: 2148: 2144: 2143: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2133: 2127: 2126: 2123: 2120: 2117: 2113: 2111: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2077: 2074:or refuse to 2073: 2069: 2065: 2064: 2051:December 2010 2050: 2048: 2047: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2025: 2023: 2015: 1999: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1983: 1979: 1978: 1977: 1972: 1968: 1964: 1956: 1953: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1943: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1933: 1928: 1924: 1920: 1913: 1909: 1905: 1902: 1897: 1893: 1892: 1891: 1887: 1883: 1879: 1877: 1874: 1873: 1872: 1867: 1863: 1859: 1852: 1848: 1844: 1843: 1842: 1838: 1834: 1830: 1826: 1825: 1824: 1823: 1818: 1814: 1810: 1803: 1795: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1784: 1780: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1767: 1759: 1757: 1756: 1752: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1738: 1734: 1732: 1728: 1726: 1722: 1715: 1711: 1707: 1704: 1699: 1695: 1691: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1667: 1662: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1647: 1646: 1639: 1637: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1619: 1618: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1598: 1590: 1578: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1541: 1537: 1533: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1514: 1510: 1506: 1502: 1501: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1489: 1487: 1486: 1483: 1476: 1472: 1465: 1458: 1450: 1448: 1447: 1443: 1439: 1435: 1431: 1427: 1425: 1420: 1418: 1414: 1409: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1387: 1381: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1371: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1335: 1328:Policy Report 1327: 1325: 1324: 1320: 1316: 1311: 1308: 1304: 1300: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1285: 1282: 1278: 1276: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1249: 1245: 1241: 1240: 1234: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1220: 1214: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1199: 1193: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1177: 1172: 1168: 1164: 1163: 1157: 1150:December 2009 1149: 1143: 1138: 1137: 1136: 1130: 1120: 1119: 1118: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1105: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1079: 1069: 1062: 1059: 1057: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1035: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1006: 998: 996: 995: 991: 987: 983: 978: 977: 973: 969: 966: 963: 959: 952:Over the line 951: 949: 948: 944: 940: 935: 934: 931: 927: 923: 915: 913: 912: 909: 907: 901: 892: 888: 884: 876: 874: 873: 870: 868: 862: 853: 847: 846: 842: 838: 834: 830: 825: 824: 821: 819: 813: 804: 800: 796: 794: 788: 783: 779: 775: 770: 762: 760: 759: 755: 751: 745: 744: 741: 739: 735: 727: 724: 722: 721: 717: 713: 708: 707: 703: 699: 695: 688:Mega Millions 687: 675: 671: 667: 663: 659: 656: 652: 650: 647: 645: 642: 638: 637: 635: 631: 630: 629: 628: 627: 626: 625: 624: 623: 622: 613: 610: 608: 602: 597: 596: 595: 594: 593: 592: 591: 590: 583: 579: 575: 571: 567: 564: 560: 554: 550: 547: 543: 540: 536: 532: 528: 527: 525: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 516: 511: 508: 506: 499: 495: 492: 488: 485: 481: 477: 473: 469: 466: 465: 464: 463: 458: 455: 453: 447: 443: 439: 435: 434: 433: 432: 429: 426: 424: 418: 414: 410: 407: 404: 400: 397: 396: 393: 390: 384: 383: 382: 381: 377: 373: 369: 365: 364:Roland Burris 359: 358: 355: 349: 345: 341: 331: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 306: 300: 299: 295: 291: 285: 284: 280: 276: 272: 268: 262: 261: 257: 253: 244: 242: 241: 237: 233: 232: 226: 223: 221: 217: 209: 207: 206: 202: 198: 194: 189: 185: 181: 179: 175: 173: 168: 165: 161: 157: 153: 152:user:benjiboi 150:For example, 148: 141: 139: 138: 134: 130: 126: 124: 120: 111: 109: 108: 106: 103: 89: 87: 86: 83: 77: 71: 67: 63: 56: 53: 51: 48: 46: 43: 41: 38: 36: 33: 31: 28: 27: 26: 24: 19: 18: 3604: 3597: 3593: 3589: 3582: 3578: 3574: 3570: 3514: 3496: 3494: 3477: 3471: 3470: 3465: 3459: 3458: 3431:creation log 3398: 3386: 3367: 3365: 3357: 3349: 3329:edit warring 3320: 3317: 3311: 3283: 3275: 3251: 3233: 3225: 3207: 3202: 3197: 3192: 3184:disruptively 3164: 3139: 3133: 3110: 3102: 3100: 3066: 3060: 3037: 3029: 3027: 2999: 2953: 2949: 2948: 2943: 2941: 2912: 2906: 2883: 2875: 2873: 2808: 2787: 2773: 2759: 2732: 2730: 2719:Ottawahitech 2712: 2679: 2668: 2667: 2663: 2656: 2654: 2652: 2621:welcome page 2604: 2501: 2475: 2462: 2458:08OceanBeach 2457: 2454: 2443:project page 2434: 2398: 2206: 2176: 2164: 2128: 2112:from editing 2107: 2091: 2070:. Users who 2061: 2054: 2026: 2019: 1850: 1827:If you read 1799: 1777: 1763: 1718: 1702: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1663: 1648: 1644: 1643: 1620: 1594: 1572: 1539: 1493: 1490:January 2010 1480: 1430:Please note: 1429: 1428: 1421: 1410: 1391: 1366:push to talk 1337: 1331: 1306: 1295: 1280: 1277:from editing 1272: 1237: 1230: 1215: 1200:from editing 1195: 1160: 1153: 1125: 1124: 1100: 1099: 1074: 1073: 1065: 1047:Flatterworld 1039: 1020: 1002: 979: 958:this comment 955: 936: 919: 905: 880: 866: 848: 826: 817: 795:from editing 790: 766: 763:January 2009 746: 732: 730: 709: 691: 497: 441: 437: 402:noticeboard. 360: 337: 313:Daisyabigael 309:Daisyabigael 305:Daisyabigael 301: 290:Daisyabigael 286: 267:Daisyabigael 263: 252:Daisyabigael 248: 229: 227: 224: 215: 213: 169: 149: 145: 116: 115: 104: 97: 93: 59: 20: 16: 15: 3263:SharabSalam 3240:SharabSalam 3180:collaborate 3176:Jihad Watch 3141:voting page 3068:voting page 2625:Nat Gertler 2108:you may be 2076:collaborate 1760:nice people 1555:Loonymonkey 1550:not a forum 1517:Loonymonkey 1284:Loonymonkey 1273:you may be 1204:Loonymonkey 1196:you may be 1070:talk page. 791:you may be 491:WP:USERPAGE 245:Book Burner 220:User:TVC 15 188:Daniel Case 178:WP:GAMETYPE 112:3RR Warning 90:Re: Housing 3585:WP:WEBHOST 3427:filter log 3368:indefinite 3321:indefinite 3276:References 3125:topic bans 3052:topic bans 2970:uninvolved 2898:topic bans 2829:topic bans 2737:quoted on 2601:March 2012 2400:subject.-- 2033:HairedGirl 2022:your edits 1963:HairedGirl 1952:WP:CANVASS 1919:HairedGirl 1858:HairedGirl 1847:WP:CANVASS 1829:WP:CANVASS 1809:HairedGirl 1802:WP:CANVASS 1735:, and the 1706:Off2riorob 1694:could have 1652:Off2riorob 1604:HairedGirl 1509:soapboxing 1473:. You can 1438:Erwin85Bot 1128:Bugboy52.4 1103:Bugboy52.4 1077:Bugboy52.4 968:Skinwalker 928:. cheers, 896:Literature 857:Literature 808:Literature 778:Paroxetine 726:Paroxetine 698:LottsoLuck 62:Wikipedian 40:Help pages 3606:Nil Einne 3531:Nil Einne 3497:read the 3446:checkuser 3405:block log 3210:talk page 3186:, and to 3121:site bans 3048:site bans 2894:site bans 2825:site bans 2447:talk page 2353:Dave Dial 2282:Dave Dial 2236:Dave Dial 2232:synthesis 2195:Dave Dial 2088:consensus 2084:talk page 1532:straw man 1261:consensus 1184:consensus 999:USA Today 887:full text 799:consensus 655:Tool2Die4 641:Tool2Die4 634:Tool2Die4 570:Tool2Die4 563:Tool2Die4 553:Tool2Die4 546:Tool2Die4 539:Tool2Die4 531:Tool2Die4 524:Tool2Die4 442:necessity 388:Skomorokh 353:Skomorokh 271:Moby Dick 64:! Please 3417:contribs 3348:|reason= 3216:or seek 3172:edit war 2982:policies 2581:Nstrauss 2528:Nstrauss 2487:Nstrauss 2342:and the 2098:or seek 2063:edit war 2041:contribs 1971:contribs 1927:contribs 1866:contribs 1817:contribs 1698:possibly 1612:contribs 1451:Talkback 1394:deletion 1338:Signpost 1239:edit war 1162:edit war 889:and the 774:edit war 601:WP:DRAMA 535:WP:CIVIL 250:deleted. 45:Tutorial 17:Welcome! 3508:unblock 3440:unblock 3346:unblock 3318:2 weeks 3313:blocked 3228:blocked 3226:may be 2502:reading 2431:Tijuana 2402:Mr Fink 2181:on the 2110:blocked 1901:WP:DUCK 1275:blocked 1198:blocked 1009:Kenosis 956:I find 833:seresin 829:seresin 793:blocked 734:seresin 606:Scarian 504:Scarian 476:warning 451:Scarian 422:Scarian 216:another 167:to me. 23:welcome 3550:TVC 15 3481:331dot 3400:TVC 15 3236:WP:BRD 2994:blocks 2976:, our 2815:. The 2776:TVC 15 2743:TVC 15 2689:Steven 2577:WP:RFC 2551:TVC 15 2510:TVC 15 2483:WP:AGF 2371:TVC 15 2309:TVC 15 2255:TVC 15 2209:TVC 15 2147:warned 2132:TVC 15 2037:(talk) 1990:TVC 15 1986:WP:RFC 1982:WP:ANI 1967:(talk) 1938:TVC 15 1923:(talk) 1912:WP:ANI 1882:TVC 15 1862:(talk) 1833:TVC 15 1813:(talk) 1783:TVC 15 1747:TVC 15 1674:TVC 15 1627:TVC 15 1608:(talk) 1569:TVC 15 1536:TVC 15 1482:Jayjg 1362:WT:3RR 1315:TVC 15 1219:TVC 15 1068:Earwig 1061:Earwig 1023:TVC 15 1007:. ... 986:TVC 15 982:WP:WQA 962:WP:WQA 939:TVC 15 837:TVC 15 750:TVC 15 712:TVC 15 666:TVC 15 574:TVC 15 484:WP:AIV 480:vandal 446:WP:ANI 444:), on 413:WP:RfC 372:TVC 15 321:TVC 15 275:TVC 15 231:C.Fred 197:TVC 15 172:WP:3RR 164:WP:CFD 119:WP:3RR 76:helpme 3501:first 3298:Block 2992:, or 2694:Zhang 2549:here. 2506:WP:RS 2478:PPACA 2472:PPACA 2340:PPACA 2179:edits 2177:Your 2031:Brown 1961:Brown 1917:Brown 1856:Brown 1807:Brown 1602:Brown 1404:and " 930:Rd232 922:WP:EW 906:T@1k? 867:T@1k? 818:T@1k? 748:also. 438:brief 340:moved 3610:talk 3554:talk 3535:talk 3485:talk 3372:El_C 3359:El_C 3323:for 3267:talk 3244:talk 3150:talk 3111:The 3077:talk 3038:The 3006:talk 2990:bans 2964:here 2954:The 2923:talk 2884:The 2849:talk 2794:talk 2780:talk 2766:talk 2747:talk 2723:talk 2671:HERE 2629:talk 2585:talk 2555:talk 2532:talk 2514:talk 2491:talk 2406:talk 2375:talk 2357:talk 2313:talk 2286:talk 2259:talk 2240:talk 2230:and 2213:talk 2199:talk 2136:talk 1994:talk 1942:talk 1906:You 1886:talk 1837:talk 1800:Per 1787:talk 1770:talk 1751:talk 1710:talk 1696:and 1692:and 1678:talk 1656:talk 1631:talk 1597:here 1573:talk 1559:talk 1540:talk 1521:talk 1511:and 1442:talk 1408:"). 1319:talk 1288:talk 1223:talk 1208:talk 1051:talk 1027:talk 1013:talk 990:talk 972:talk 943:talk 899:geek 891:PMID 881:See 860:geek 841:talk 811:geek 754:talk 716:talk 702:talk 670:talk 639:(1) 578:talk 472:This 416:not. 376:talk 348:here 325:talk 294:talk 279:talk 256:talk 236:talk 201:talk 133:talk 98:east 3450:log 3397:). 2944:not 2809:Hi, 2717:. X 2344:CBO 2253:it. 2039:• ( 1969:• ( 1925:• ( 1864:• ( 1815:• ( 1725:CNN 1690:may 1666:CNN 1610:• ( 1434:bot 1376:AfD 1352:or 1279:. 1202:. 1134:=-= 1109:=-= 1083:=-= 805:. 470:1) 121:on 102:718 3612:) 3556:) 3537:) 3511:}} 3505:{{ 3487:) 3474:: 3462:: 3444:• 3438:• 3434:• 3429:• 3425:• 3420:• 3415:• 3411:• 3407:• 3354:. 3352:}} 3344:{{ 3335:. 3269:) 3246:) 3152:) 3144:. 3123:, 3079:) 3071:. 3050:, 3008:) 2988:, 2966:. 2925:) 2917:. 2896:, 2851:) 2827:, 2796:) 2782:) 2768:) 2749:) 2725:) 2685:. 2631:) 2587:) 2557:) 2534:) 2516:) 2493:) 2449:. 2408:) 2377:) 2359:) 2315:) 2288:) 2261:) 2242:) 2215:) 2201:) 2145:I 2138:) 2028:-- 1996:) 1944:) 1888:) 1851:or 1839:) 1789:) 1772:) 1753:) 1729:, 1712:) 1680:) 1672:). 1658:) 1633:) 1575:) 1561:) 1542:) 1523:) 1444:) 1368:) 1348:, 1321:) 1290:) 1225:) 1210:) 1131:| 1106:| 1080:| 1053:) 1029:) 1015:) 992:) 974:) 945:) 902:| 863:| 843:) 814:| 756:) 740:) 738:¡? 736:( 718:) 704:) 672:) 580:) 526:: 378:) 327:) 296:) 281:) 258:) 238:) 203:) 135:) 78:}} 74:{{ 3608:( 3552:( 3533:( 3483:( 3454:) 3452:) 3448:( 3403:( 3265:( 3242:( 3148:( 3075:( 3004:( 2921:( 2847:( 2792:( 2778:( 2764:( 2745:( 2721:( 2627:( 2583:( 2553:( 2530:( 2512:( 2489:( 2404:( 2373:( 2355:( 2311:( 2284:( 2257:( 2238:( 2211:( 2197:( 2134:( 2043:) 1992:( 1973:) 1940:( 1929:) 1884:( 1868:) 1835:( 1819:) 1785:( 1768:( 1749:( 1708:( 1676:( 1654:( 1629:( 1625:. 1614:) 1571:( 1557:( 1538:( 1519:( 1466:. 1440:( 1317:( 1286:( 1221:( 1206:( 1049:( 1025:( 1011:( 988:( 984:. 970:( 941:( 839:( 752:( 714:( 700:( 668:( 576:( 374:( 323:( 292:( 277:( 254:( 234:( 199:( 131:( 100:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Index