Knowledge

User talk:Tepid1

Source 📝

129: 23: 38:
policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should
143:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 150:
Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at
151: 86: 35: 106: 31: 54:
articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
140: 61: 102: 26:
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article
94: 90: 165:
template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you.
136: 114: 101:
For information on how to contribute to Knowledge when you have conflict of interest, please see
27: 166: 161:
You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the
71: 128: 194: 188: 183: 162: 155: 144: 110: 180: 70:
to the Knowledge article or website of your organization in other articles (see
105:. For more details about what constitutes a conflict of interest, please see 22: 199: 169: 118: 139:, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for 64:
about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
127: 152:Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Oxford Round Table 85:relevant policies and guidelines, especially 8: 7: 124:AfD nomination of Oxford Round Table 14: 21: 34:. In keeping with Knowledge's 107:Knowledge:Conflict of Interest 1: 200:20:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC) 170:23:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 119:03:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC) 17:Conflict of interest warning 158:with four tildes (~~~~). 215: 179:I have blocked this as a 135:An editor has nominated 103:Knowledge:Business' FAQ 184:single purpose account 154:and please be sure to 132: 45:exercise great caution 163:articles for deletion 145:What Knowledge is not 131: 87:neutral point of view 36:neutral point of view 77:and you must always: 62:deletion discussions 32:conflict of interest 156:sign your comments 137:Oxford Round Table 133: 28:Oxford Round Table 198: 30:, you may have a 206: 192: 25: 214: 213: 209: 208: 207: 205: 204: 203: 177: 126: 109:. Thank you. 83:avoid breaching 19: 12: 11: 5: 212: 210: 176: 173: 125: 122: 99: 98: 80: 79: 78: 72:Knowledge:Spam 65: 55: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 211: 202: 201: 196: 191: 190: 185: 182: 174: 172: 171: 168: 164: 159: 157: 153: 148: 146: 142: 138: 130: 123: 121: 120: 116: 112: 108: 104: 96: 95:autobiography 92: 91:verifiability 88: 84: 81: 76: 75: 73: 69: 66: 63: 59: 58:participating 56: 53: 50: 49: 48: 46: 42: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 187: 178: 160: 149: 134: 100: 82: 67: 57: 51: 44: 40: 20: 167:Coldmachine 181:disruptive 141:deletion 111:Pairadox 175:Blocked 68:linking 52:editing 147:"). 93:, and 47:when: 195:Help! 41:avoid 115:talk 189:Guy 74:); 60:in 43:or 186:. 117:) 89:, 197:) 193:( 113:( 97:.

Index


Oxford Round Table
conflict of interest
neutral point of view
deletion discussions
Knowledge:Spam
neutral point of view
verifiability
autobiography
Knowledge:Business' FAQ
Knowledge:Conflict of Interest
Pairadox
talk
03:18, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Round Table
deletion
What Knowledge is not
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/Oxford Round Table
sign your comments
articles for deletion
Coldmachine
23:07, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
disruptive
single purpose account
Guy
Help!
20:00, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.