677:, um, no one wrote, suggested, implied, or hinted that was the case. (So to whom are you addressing? A ghost?) This is the second instance of you responding to things not said or even implied, then knocking them down, a well-known manipulative argumentation technique called "straw man" of course, and, it makes it increasingly difficult to entertain you seriously and keep good faith. On a related point I didn't want to bring up but now that Thewriter006 has, it is curious, you never having edited any WP:CHESS article til now, what drew you to the 960 article. (You don't have to answer, of course, but your behaviors have made the question pregnant.) --
1555:
1134:
1767:
1526:
1389:
173:
1590:. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge (XXG)âs norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge (XXG) administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
1322:
1795:
423:
1007:. (I used to inspect WP:CHESS changes regularly, but because it's so broad, found it not so useful. You can mark individual articles to display on your personal "Watchlist" by either editing an article, which adds to your Watchlist, or by clicking the empty star above any article you want to watch.) Cheers, --
1715:
Please don't use social media sites or forums such as reddit, substack, youtube, twitter, telegram, facebook etc etc for references. These sites are user generated, meaning anyone can post anything they like with little or no oversight, therefore they contain a lot of garbage. They may never be used
917:
Writer006, topic experience isn't of course required to edit WP, and Ixtal's chief complaint is the format of the sec, and the quantity of quotes, which are valid concerns, but her deletion of the entire referenced sec was inappropriate, she was previously advised against this sort of thing by a WP
496:
to you, as you may be unfamiliar with the editing approach I took when editing the page. Bold edits are not unusual and reversion is one of the expected outcomes, which is why I later went to the talk page to discuss with other editors and see if consensus can be achieved. We may arrive at one, but
894:
2 - Now that I think more about this situation and stuff, it seems like what's going on is you're kinda outside the chess community and then you're saying 'Hey chess community (or 9LX community), while I'm not so familiar with 9LX or even chess, I'm very familiar with
Knowledge (XXG), and it seems
691:
Here's my theory/hypothesis: Ixtal doesn't really have much chess experience. And then the generic chess
Knowledge (XXG) articles were accessible to Ixtal. Hence, Ixtal didn't make any edits. However, when it came to 9LX, this is where Ixtal's low chess experience came in. Ixtal's Knowledge (XXG)
386:
but no one's really compiled a list outside reddit or stackexchange. And even if they did compile a list it wouldn't be exactly a primary source unless the list is some kind of autogenerated list like you input your parameters and then using something similar to QUERY in google sheets you get the
303:
I am not sure people care about each and every entry in that list, either, but I wasn't aware of it until now. Most of the stuff in the "Notes" column ought to have explicit citations of sources; for example, who really cares, or ever cared, that
Vladimir Kramnik was the youngest player to reach
260:
Consider the claim that Judit Polgar was the first female player to have a rating above 2600. This is undoubtedly true. But to put it into
Knowledge (XXG), you would have to demonstrate that it is "notable", i.e. that people care about it. For instance, an article in the press mentioning that
656:
Re 'I do want to improve our encyclopedic coverage of chess topics' - then any particular your 1st stop was the 9LX page and in particular your 1st chess-related
Knowledge (XXG) decision was to delete AN ENTIRE SECTION that's been up for years? Like, what, it's a coincidence that your 1st
1323:
Talk:World Chess
Championship 2021#'It is. As per FIDE rules, unless you announce adjustment, you MUST move the piece you've touched. Of course it's the responsibility of the opponent to claim it, but it's a violation of the rules nonetheless. This is why I view it firmly as a fair play
518:
Cool. thanks for the info. Yeah it was either like I was new to something or breaking the good faith assumption is warranted. So yeah. (reading now...) Ah ok it's indeed a
Knowledge (XXG) thing. Eh. I think I kinda disagree with it, but ok ok fine. I guess it's like Cunningham's Law.
1087:
Actually re 'I'm glad you don't think I was acting in bad faith.' The whole
Knowledge (XXG) practice of this Cunninghama's Law-style of radical edits is in my opinion insane. Without this practice, I would've definitely assumed bad faith/rejected good faith. But ok it is what it is.
261:
fact. This could be an article in the "chess press", e.g. something like chessbase (online) or some print chess magazine, or it could be an article in the mainstream press. I have not seen, or even looked for, such an article, but you are welcome to try your hand. The article,
491:
Hi! I'll reply in the 960 thread soon but I'll have to wait until the evening when I have enough time to write down my thoughts. Both you and IHTS have raised some interesting questions/points I feel need well-written replies. In the meanwhile, I thought I'd link
750:) to supplant real thinking, thoughtfulness, and evaluation, which is a huge dumbed-down danger to people's minds IMO, but nevertheless the accepted argumentation culture on WP. (So, pressing the consistency issue w/ get you nowhere, IMO.) Cheers, --
741:
For me, am a believer in consistency, so that compare w/ move me if I were in her shoes. But the deal is, even when consistency is screaming to be addressed, WP culture is such that editors will conveniently ignore, using prepackaged WP links (like
902:
where there was someone so familiar with a particular novel series 'Classroom of the Elite' but wasn't experienced enough with chess and so made wrong claims about chess based on the novel series (eg 'What happened in the series is realistic.')
133:, and for writing a detailed edit comment about the problem. The reason your edit didn't work was that you put the boldface markup on the wrong side of the column separator â you needed ''']'''|'''3''' instead of ''']|''' '''3'''. I fixed it.
887:
1 - Am I wrong to think chess experience (Note: not expertise but experience!) is relevant here? To the chess community (I really mean chess community not just the 9LX community), the quotes may make sense. To the non-chess community, maybe
1630:
579:
I said 'The main question is "how familiar are you with chess / 9LX?"' and then Ixtal says 'Enough to where I can contribute to content discussions on its
Knowledge (XXG) article.' Do you think Ixtal has enough 'chess experience'Â ?
1434:
216:
639:
I didn't mean that as my main editing purpose on
Knowledge (XXG), but I do want to improve our encyclopedic coverage of chess topics. If not I wouldn't be discussing improvements on a chess article talk page. â
1418:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
935:
WOW 1 - not just previously warned -- excuse me -- advised 2 - but still repeated anyway and 3 - it was only a month ago? 4 - Does this sound like the 2015 Wesley So - Var Akobian incident? Or what?
200:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1321:
Yes, but if you think your behavior is funny on Knowledge (XXG) then I think you need to recalibrate your sense of humor for this venue. I'm also not a fan of talk page section titles such as
1403:
186:
1621:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
764:
No point in tackling that article if I fail to get consensus on this one. First this then the chess endgames article. Again, I will not respond to queries about chess experience. â
713:
Also IHTS God bless you really. Bobby Fischer I'm sure is smiling upon you from heaven (or below you from hell - who knows really) for your contributions to 9LX on Knowledge (XXG).
1004:
699:
Also Ixtal indeed doesn't have to answer, but silence, much like chess, would speak for itself. (Let's see if Ixtal is familiar enough with chess to understand the joke here.)
349:
1771:
1530:
533:
I wouldn't necessarily equate it with Cunningham's Law, but it's not too different. I'm glad you don't think I was acting in bad faith. Far from it! I just want, as you do,
265:, does not mention that statistic; if you think the statistic is notable, you might want to add it to that article, even more than adding it to this list article.
1144:
has an RFC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the
1021:
Oh I mean how do I search for contributions for Ixtal's WP:CHESS contributions please? I mean: You said 'paging thru your contributions'. How do you do this?
1502:
1360:
1685:
1813:
1564:
727:
Re 'what drew you to the 960 article' what is your opinion of that Ixtal didn't do something about the chess endgames quotations after I brought it up?
501:
so that a wider group of editors can help reach a consensus. If I seem passive aggressive or uncooperative I can assure you it is not my intention :) â
799:
Wait we didn't ask about chess experience this time. We asked about chess interest. Why is chess960 your 1st stop in the chess wikipedia world iydmma?
493:
345:
1820:
1727:
parts of wikipedia, including article talk pages, personal talk pages and even edit summaries. Any negative information about a living person
1681:
350:
https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/36988/how-do-i-find-data-to-determine-records-like-the-youngest-person-to-obtain-a-cer/37245#37245
1457:
353:
239:
891:
It seems like you need both experience in both chess and Knowledge (XXG) because you're making a decision about chess and Knowledge (XXG).
534:
31:
341:
899:
581:
498:
1284:. I think your enthusiasm could be a benefit to wikipedia, but I have a very negative reaction to many of your edit summaries.
1183:
56:
1499:
Oh you thought meant morally sucks? Magnus sucks at classical chess960. That's what I meant. However, Magnus does suck morally.
1453:
235:
1427:
780:'No point in tackling that article if I fail to get consensus on this one. First this then the chess endgames article' --: -->
209:
61:
52:
443:
65:
1719:
Also, please stop gossiping about chess players. This is not TMZ, we have a policy called "biographies of living persons" (
895:
like you guys aren't doing what you're supposed to on Knowledge (XXG) even though you've been doing it for years already'Â ?
1503:
https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/88625/would-it-be-have-been-unhelpful-for-hans-niemann-to-bring-up-magnus-carlsens
1361:
https://law.stackexchange.com/questions/88625/would-it-be-have-been-unhelpful-for-hans-niemann-to-bring-up-magnus-carlsens
1735:
747:
435:
1049:
Don't know how that's done, or if even possible. Ixtal's contribs started Sept 2020, so wasn't hard to page thru all. --
254:
1808:
1803:
1474:
You have been asked before, but I ask again: please remain civil in your edit summaries. These two are not appropriate
71:
1667:
1439:
221:
439:
1538:
1489:
1146:
130:
743:
42:
27:
1054:
1012:
926:
839:
755:
682:
630:
570:
309:
273:
1415:
197:
78:
346:
https://chess.stackexchange.com/questions/36699/list-of-female-chess-players-by-their-peak-fide-blitz-rating
1675:
1534:
1485:
454:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wesley_So&type=revision&diff=1073923417&oldid=1073373212
82:
1637:
1739:
1626:
1281:
94:
86:
354:
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/po1a08/list_of_records_for_youngest_supergms_since_1950/hctahkh/
47:
1779:
1751:
1666:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited
1280:
I think your edit summaries are often wildly inappropriate, so I'm asking that you read and consider
1140:
1122:
461:
447:
1743:
1397:
1197:, comes very close to vandalism. Your intentions might be honorable but the practice of reproducing
284:
180:
1835:
1652:
1247:
1206:
1050:
1008:
922:
835:
751:
678:
626:
602:
566:
305:
269:
116:
98:
1411:
193:
1234:
Our personal knowledge or experience does not count in Knowledge (XXG). Article text is based on
342:
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/qzpm44/re_alireza_firouzja_2800_youngest_list_of_records/
38:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
1571:
988:
900:
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/wm3enq/is_it_possible_to_be_expected_to_definitely_beat/
582:
https://www.reddit.com/r/chess/comments/wm3enq/is_it_possible_to_be_expected_to_definitely_beat/
562:
1567:, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles
848:
re doubt so LOL. re PS - yeah I saw that. damn yasser. yasser's usually so calmn and then LOL.
93:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1701:
1505:
1363:
1344:
1308:
1257:
1221:
1168:
1107:
1089:
1064:
1036:
1022:
974:
950:
936:
904:
866:
849:
818:
800:
786:
728:
714:
700:
658:
584:
520:
472:
400:
289:
149:
1423:
657:
chess-related Knowledge (XXG) decision was to do with the 9LX page and was such a huge edit?
205:
1446:
1343:
2 - You don't have to be a fan. You just have to accept the truth that Magnus cheated Nepo.
598:
228:
138:
1720:
1426:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1419:
1198:
1126:
625:
seems a bit disingenuous based on that you've never edited any WP:CHESS article til now. --
208:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
201:
1775:
1747:
1331:
1289:
1156:
770:
646:
611:
547:
507:
457:
427:
35:
1235:
1678:, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles.
1831:
1648:
1243:
1202:
382:
how exactly does one cite something like this? technically they can just look it up in
111:
106:
1554:
1239:
621:
Never brought up your profession or expertise. The point is your telling Thewriter006
1692:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
1697:
1693:
1633:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the
1299:
k fine thanks for your honesty. inappropriate comedy than generic inappropriate? XD
438:. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
262:
1388:
992:
970:
558:
172:
1575:. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and
1586:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
134:
1193:
in the article about "anal beads", by using as sources some anonymous posts on
1327:
1306:
https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Fischer_random_chess&action=history
1285:
1151:
863:
832:
765:
641:
606:
542:
502:
623:
I just want, as you do, to improve our encyclopedic coverage of chess topics
431:
1839:
1794:
1783:
1755:
1705:
1656:
1614:
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
1542:
1513:
1493:
1461:
1371:
1352:
1335:
1316:
1293:
1265:
1251:
1229:
1210:
1176:
1161:
1115:
1097:
1072:
1058:
1044:
1030:
1016:
982:
958:
944:
930:
912:
874:
857:
843:
826:
808:
794:
775:
759:
736:
722:
708:
686:
666:
651:
634:
616:
592:
574:
552:
528:
512:
480:
465:
408:
362:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Chess_prodigy#List_of_youngest_female_grandmasters
313:
297:
277:
268:
Likewise for the claim that Hou Yifan was the youngest ever female 2600+.
243:
157:
142:
119:
471:
so as far as wikipedia is concerned...wesley did not (necessarily) reply?
1819:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
1430:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
422:
212:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
129:
Hi â thanks for trying to fix the missing boldface for LĂȘ Quang LiĂȘm at
1407:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1217:
190:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
784:'Again, I will not respond to queries about chess experience.' --: -->
1774:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1533:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
1194:
898:
No offense, but it seems like the same situation I encountered here
358:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Chess_prodigy#List_of_youngest_grandmasters
1238:. No editor can "compromise" by accepting something that lacks the
1671:
1326:
What is the purpose of trying to interact on wikipedia like that?
285:
https://en.wikipedia.org/List_of_chess_players_by_peak_FIDE_rating
90:
1731:
be backed by reliable sources or it will be immediately removed.
1443:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
862:
oh dead link but order speaks for itself is yeah original here:
675:
I didn't mean that as my main editing purpose on Knowledge (XXG)
225:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add
1823:, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:
1433:
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
1401:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All
446:. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
388:
383:
361:
357:
215:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
969:
How to search contributions for WP:CHESS please? like in here
601:
articles even though I am a computer scientist by profession,
184:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
430:. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
387:
youngest ever list... is it acceptable to cite only the site
340:
who was the 1 before alireza? who was the 1 before that? see
1793:
1220:? . It wasn't anonymous. I'm nicbentulan. See my linktree.
785:
It's ok. Your silence, like chess, 'speaks for itself'. ;)
1357:
Wait so what's wrong w/ what I did? Magnus DID cheat Nepo.
1256:
Who said anything about personal knowledge or experience?
817:
IHTS Do you think Ixtal knows about 'speaks for itself'Â ?
1005:
Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Chess/Index of chess articles
973:
I'll type 'WP:Chess' in 'Tag filter:' and press search?
949:
wait why merely 'advised against' instead of 'warned'Â ?
605:. Editing activity does not correlate with expertise. â
1670:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
1481:
1476:
1414:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1305:
1218:
https://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:The_Gnome#Compromise
1190:
919:
453:
360:(oh and to my very pleasant surprise there is now this
196:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1738:. We're not here to hang out and talk crap, there are
781:
Ah I see ok makes sense. Thanks for the clarification.
1772:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
1531:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
442:
and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
283:
why do we do 2800 for open but not 2600 for females?
971:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/Ixtal
921:
but apparently discounted that advise. Take care, --
1629:or you may learn more about this contentious topic
1608:
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
101:, or ask your question on this page and then place
373:2 re citing assuming we are going to mention this:
1601:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
1581:imply that there are any issues with your editing
1216:You didn't answer the question about compromise
1611:follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
1593:Within contentious topics, editors should edit
1812:from editing because it appears that you are
1302:wait you're talking about the 9LX page right?
8:
1746:you are likely to end up blocked or banned.
1662:Disambiguation link notification for June 14
1561:You have recently edited a page related to
864:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EU5XvLEoKWY
597:The same way you won't see me editing many
494:Knowledge (XXG):BOLD, revert, discuss cycle
1605:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge (XXG);
1470:Please remain civil in your edit summaries
1236:third-party, independent, reliable sources
167:
77:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1825:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
1716:as a source for anything on wikipedia.
105:before the question. Again, welcome!
1742:where you can do that. Unless you are
1167:wow ok you are really into this huh?
696:Ixtal to do something about the page.
7:
1398:2022 Arbitration Committee elections
181:2021 Arbitration Committee elections
1770:There is currently a discussion at
1734:In general, note that wikipedia is
1529:There is currently a discussion at
1416:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1382:ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
198:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
164:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
43:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1565:living or recently deceased people
1548:Introduction to contentious topics
1003:in the left sidebar on this page:
692:experience + low chess experience
30:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
1814:not here to build an encyclopedia
1765:
1553:
1524:
1387:
1132:
421:
171:
62:How to create your first article
1627:arbitration clerks' noticeboard
1617:refrain from gaming the system.
1437:and submit your choices on the
987:You can display changes to all
219:and submit your choices on the
1266:10:36, 27 September 2022 (UTC)
1252:22:00, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
1230:19:29, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
1211:18:36, 26 September 2022 (UTC)
1177:11:10, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
1162:08:14, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
1116:11:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
1098:00:26, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
1031:11:09, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
1017:01:15, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
983:00:23, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
959:00:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
945:00:13, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
931:23:33, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
913:20:47, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
809:01:18, 25 September 2022 (UTC)
795:11:12, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
776:08:00, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
760:02:25, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
737:00:27, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
723:00:24, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
709:00:20, 24 September 2022 (UTC)
687:23:20, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
667:20:49, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
652:17:05, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
635:16:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
617:15:55, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
593:15:52, 23 September 2022 (UTC)
575:23:54, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
559:paging thru your contributions
553:16:45, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
529:16:21, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
513:16:17, 22 September 2022 (UTC)
34:, especially what you did for
1:
1744:here to build an encyclopedia
1494:13:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
1462:00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
1353:04:21, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
1336:00:00, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
1317:14:26, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
1294:04:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)
314:17:06, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
298:13:37, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
278:01:55, 13 December 2021 (UTC)
244:00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
158:04:02, 1 September 2021 (UTC)
1736:not a social networking site
1073:15:02, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
1059:14:27, 12 October 2022 (UTC)
858:09:04, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
844:03:34, 13 October 2022 (UTC)
831:Doubt so. p.s This is funny
561:was unable to find a single
557:That's interesting, because
389:https://www.chessgraphs.com/
384:https://www.chessgraphs.com/
255:List of female chess players
120:01:33, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
1711:Sites not to use as sources
1668:World Chess960 Championship
1201:is entirely unacceptable. -
1191:inserting ridiculous claims
1184:CarlsenâNiemann controversy
1045:23:10, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
827:09:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
434:, but you didn't provide a
409:01:43, 7 January 2022 (UTC)
143:14:15, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
1855:
1454:MediaWiki message delivery
236:MediaWiki message delivery
125:boldface for LĂȘ Quang LiĂȘm
1840:19:50, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
1821:guide to appealing blocks
1784:19:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
1756:22:00, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
1706:06:05, 14 June 2023 (UTC)
565:article you've edited. --
481:08:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)
466:16:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
444:referencing for beginners
131:Champions Chess Tour 2021
95:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
26:Hello, Thewriter006, and
1657:06:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
1625:you may ask them at the
1569:, a topic designated as
1543:02:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
1514:12:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1509:
1451:to your user talk page.
1372:12:31, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
1367:
1348:
1312:
1261:
1225:
1172:
1111:
1093:
1068:
1040:
1026:
978:
954:
940:
908:
875:17:50, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
870:
853:
822:
804:
790:
732:
718:
704:
662:
588:
539:coverage of chess topics
524:
497:if we don't I'll file a
476:
404:
293:
233:to your user talk page.
153:
57:How to develop articles
1798:
1797:
1740:plenty of other sites
1412:Arbitration Committee
1395:Hello! Voting in the
1240:required verification
194:Arbitration Committee
178:Hello! Voting in the
148:thanks for the info!
1694:opt-out instructions
1189:Please realize that
1141:Fischer random chess
1123:Fischer random chess
304:2800+ at the time?
1723:) which applies in
1106:What is BRD again?
748:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
499:request for comment
331:1 re notable claim:
1799:
1684:âą Join us at the
1600:
1596:
1588:contentious topics
1580:
1428:arbitration policy
1199:unreliable sources
452:Edit in question:
440:include a citation
210:arbitration policy
53:How to edit a page
32:your contributions
1689:
1676:usually incorrect
1674:. Such links are
1598:
1594:
1578:
1464:
1160:
774:
650:
615:
551:
511:
251:
250:
246:
85:your messages on
1846:
1826:
1769:
1768:
1679:
1642:
1636:
1557:
1535:7d9CBWvAg8U4p3s8
1528:
1527:
1486:7d9CBWvAg8U4p3s8
1483:
1478:
1452:
1450:
1391:
1155:
1136:
1135:
769:
645:
610:
599:computer science
546:
506:
425:
234:
232:
175:
168:
114:
109:
104:
87:discussion pages
1854:
1853:
1849:
1848:
1847:
1845:
1844:
1843:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1817:
1791:
1766:
1763:
1713:
1686:DPL WikiProject
1664:
1646:
1645:
1640:
1634:
1563:articles about
1558:
1550:
1525:
1522:
1480:
1475:
1472:
1467:
1466:
1444:
1392:
1384:
1278:
1187:
1157:Non nobis solum
1150:. Thank you. â
1147:discussion page
1137:
1133:
1130:
997:Related changes
771:Non nobis solum
744:WP:OTHERCONTENT
647:Non nobis solum
612:Non nobis solum
548:Non nobis solum
535:to improve our
508:Non nobis solum
489:
436:reliable source
419:
258:
226:
166:
127:
112:
107:
102:
72:Manual of Style
36:The Lost Symbol
19:
12:
11:
5:
1852:
1850:
1818:
1801:You have been
1800:
1792:
1790:
1787:
1762:
1759:
1712:
1709:
1663:
1660:
1619:
1618:
1615:
1612:
1609:
1606:
1599:constructively
1582:
1559:
1552:
1551:
1549:
1546:
1521:
1518:
1517:
1516:
1500:
1471:
1468:
1435:the candidates
1404:eligible users
1393:
1386:
1385:
1383:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1358:
1355:
1341:
1303:
1300:
1277:
1276:Edit summaries
1274:
1273:
1272:
1271:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1186:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1131:
1129:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1104:
1103:
1102:
1101:
1100:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1063:ah ok thanks.
1033:
1002:
998:
995:, or click on
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
947:
918:administrator
896:
892:
889:
885:
884:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
860:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
797:
782:
762:
725:
711:
697:
676:
671:
670:
669:
624:
603:Ihardlythinkso
595:
488:
485:
484:
483:
418:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
395:
394:
393:
392:
377:
376:
375:
374:
368:
367:
366:
365:
335:
334:
333:
332:
326:
325:
324:
323:
317:
316:
306:Bruce leverett
270:Bruce leverett
257:
252:
249:
248:
217:the candidates
187:eligible users
176:
165:
162:
161:
160:
126:
123:
75:
74:
69:
66:Article Wizard
59:
50:
45:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1851:
1842:
1841:
1837:
1833:
1822:
1815:
1811:
1810:
1806:
1805:
1796:
1788:
1786:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1760:
1758:
1757:
1753:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1732:
1730:
1726:
1722:
1717:
1710:
1708:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1695:
1690:
1687:
1683:
1677:
1673:
1669:
1661:
1659:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1644:
1639:
1638:Ctopics/aware
1632:
1628:
1624:
1616:
1613:
1610:
1607:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1591:
1589:
1584:
1576:
1574:
1573:
1568:
1566:
1556:
1547:
1545:
1544:
1540:
1536:
1532:
1519:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1504:
1501:
1498:
1497:
1496:
1495:
1491:
1487:
1482:
1477:
1469:
1465:
1463:
1459:
1455:
1448:
1442:
1441:
1436:
1431:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1408:
1406:
1405:
1400:
1399:
1390:
1381:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1362:
1359:
1356:
1354:
1350:
1346:
1342:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1314:
1310:
1307:
1304:
1301:
1298:
1297:
1296:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1283:
1275:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1254:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1208:
1204:
1200:
1196:
1192:
1185:
1182:
1178:
1174:
1170:
1166:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1158:
1153:
1149:
1148:
1143:
1142:
1128:
1124:
1121:
1117:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1086:
1074:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1046:
1042:
1038:
1034:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1000:
996:
994:
990:
986:
985:
984:
980:
976:
972:
968:
960:
956:
952:
948:
946:
942:
938:
934:
933:
932:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
914:
910:
906:
901:
897:
893:
890:
886:
876:
872:
868:
865:
861:
859:
855:
851:
847:
846:
845:
841:
837:
833:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
816:
810:
806:
802:
798:
796:
792:
788:
783:
779:
778:
777:
772:
767:
763:
761:
757:
753:
749:
745:
740:
739:
738:
734:
730:
726:
724:
720:
716:
712:
710:
706:
702:
698:
695:
690:
689:
688:
684:
680:
674:
672:
668:
664:
660:
655:
654:
653:
648:
643:
638:
637:
636:
632:
628:
622:
620:
619:
618:
613:
608:
604:
600:
596:
594:
590:
586:
583:
578:
577:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
555:
554:
549:
544:
540:
538:
532:
531:
530:
526:
522:
517:
516:
515:
514:
509:
504:
500:
495:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
469:
468:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
449:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
424:
416:
410:
406:
402:
399:
398:
397:
396:
390:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
372:
371:
370:
369:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
338:
337:
336:
330:
329:
328:
327:
321:
320:
319:
318:
315:
311:
307:
302:
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
286:
280:
279:
275:
271:
266:
264:
256:
253:
247:
245:
241:
237:
230:
224:
223:
218:
213:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
189:
188:
183:
182:
177:
174:
170:
169:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
146:
145:
144:
140:
136:
132:
124:
122:
121:
118:
115:
110:
100:
96:
92:
88:
84:
80:
73:
70:
67:
63:
60:
58:
54:
51:
49:
46:
44:
41:
40:
39:
37:
33:
29:
24:
23:
16:
1830:
1809:indefinitely
1807:
1802:
1764:
1733:
1728:
1724:
1718:
1714:
1691:
1665:
1647:
1622:
1620:
1592:
1587:
1585:
1570:
1562:
1560:
1523:
1506:Thewriter006
1473:
1438:
1432:
1409:
1402:
1396:
1394:
1364:Thewriter006
1345:Thewriter006
1309:Thewriter006
1282:WP:SUMMARYNO
1279:
1258:Thewriter006
1222:Thewriter006
1188:
1169:Thewriter006
1145:
1139:
1138:
1108:Thewriter006
1090:Thewriter006
1065:Thewriter006
1037:Thewriter006
1023:Thewriter006
975:Thewriter006
951:Thewriter006
937:Thewriter006
905:Thewriter006
867:Thewriter006
850:Thewriter006
819:Thewriter006
801:Thewriter006
787:Thewriter006
729:Thewriter006
715:Thewriter006
701:Thewriter006
693:
659:Thewriter006
585:Thewriter006
537:encyclopedic
536:
521:Thewriter006
490:
473:Thewriter006
451:
448:my talk page
420:
401:Thewriter006
290:Thewriter006
288:
281:
267:
263:Judit Polgar
259:
220:
214:
191:
185:
179:
150:Thewriter006
128:
99:my talk page
97:, ask me on
76:
68:if you wish)
25:
21:
20:
1643:template.
1572:contentious
1520:Noticeboard
1440:voting page
426:Hello, I'm
222:voting page
89:using four
64:(using the
1776:MaxBrowne2
1748:MaxBrowne2
1696:. Thanks,
1680:(Read the
1623:procedures
1424:topic bans
1340:1 - lol k.
673:Ixtal, re
458:Le Marteau
428:Le Marteau
417:March 2022
206:topic bans
103:{{helpme}}
79:Wikipedian
1832:Cullen328
1789:July 2023
1649:Stylez995
1595:carefully
1420:site bans
1244:The Gnome
1203:The Gnome
991:articles
694:triggered
432:Wesley So
202:site bans
81:! Please
989:WP:CHESS
563:WP:CHESS
322:2 things
48:Tutorial
22:Welcome!
1804:blocked
1698:DPL bot
1447:NoACEMM
1324:issue.'
1125:has an
282:--: -->
229:NoACEMM
28:welcome
17:Welcome
1721:WP:BLP
1195:reddit
999:under
135:Joriki
117:(talk)
91:tildes
1672:Spike
1577:does
1328:Quale
1286:Quale
1152:Ixtal
1001:Tools
766:Ixtal
642:Ixtal
607:Ixtal
543:Ixtal
503:Ixtal
108:Loves
1836:talk
1816:.
1780:talk
1752:talk
1729:must
1702:talk
1653:talk
1631:here
1597:and
1539:talk
1510:talk
1490:talk
1458:talk
1410:The
1368:talk
1349:talk
1332:talk
1313:talk
1290:talk
1262:talk
1248:talk
1226:talk
1207:talk
1173:talk
1112:talk
1094:talk
1069:talk
1055:talk
1051:IHTS
1041:talk
1027:talk
1013:talk
1009:IHTS
993:here
979:talk
955:talk
941:talk
927:talk
923:IHTS
909:talk
888:not.
871:talk
854:talk
840:talk
836:IHTS
834:. --
823:talk
805:talk
791:talk
756:talk
752:IHTS
746:or
733:talk
719:talk
705:talk
683:talk
679:IHTS
663:talk
631:talk
627:IHTS
589:talk
571:talk
567:IHTS
541:. â
525:talk
477:talk
462:talk
405:talk
364::D )
356:and
352:and
348:and
344:and
310:talk
294:talk
274:talk
240:talk
192:The
154:talk
139:talk
113:Macs
83:sign
55:and
1761:ANI
1725:all
1682:FAQ
1579:not
1242:. -
1127:RFC
487:BRD
1838:)
1827:.
1782:)
1754:)
1704:)
1688:.)
1655:)
1641:}}
1635:{{
1583:.
1541:)
1512:)
1492:)
1484:.
1479:;
1460:)
1449:}}
1445:{{
1422:,
1370:)
1351:)
1334:)
1315:)
1292:)
1264:)
1250:)
1228:)
1209:)
1175:)
1159:.
1154:â
1114:)
1096:)
1071:)
1057:)
1043:)
1035:?
1029:)
1015:)
981:)
957:)
943:)
929:)
911:)
873:)
856:)
842:)
825:)
807:)
793:)
773:.
768:â
758:)
735:)
721:)
707:)
685:)
665:)
649:.
644:â
633:)
614:.
609:â
591:)
573:)
550:.
545:â
527:)
510:.
505:â
479:)
464:)
450:.
407:)
312:)
296:)
276:)
242:)
231:}}
227:{{
204:,
156:)
141:)
1834:(
1778:(
1750:(
1700:(
1651:(
1537:(
1508:(
1488:(
1456:(
1366:(
1347:(
1330:(
1311:(
1288:(
1260:(
1246:(
1224:(
1205:(
1171:(
1110:(
1092:(
1067:(
1053:(
1039:(
1025:(
1011:(
977:(
953:(
939:(
925:(
907:(
869:(
852:(
838:(
821:(
803:(
789:(
754:(
731:(
717:(
703:(
681:(
661:(
629:(
587:(
569:(
523:(
475:(
460:(
403:(
391:?
308:(
292:(
272:(
238:(
152:(
137:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
