31:
1212:– to publish an article written by the very company who product the article is about. Would you accept a newspaper where all the articles were written by the subjects of the article? Would you trust reporting on your competitors if they were allowed to write it themselves? Hence, your article is on an uneasy footing to start with, and would usually need to be held to an even higher standard than usual to compensate for your
491:
967:
873:
page. I just noticed that the image on the bio (which you helped move, btw- thank you so much for that!) has some meta-data, that raises some privacy concerns. I do not know how to remove the meta-data for that image. Can you please help with this? I have another version of the same image without the
388:
The journal
InfectionControl.tips is real and they pioneered the pan access movement Which is an extension to the open acress platform. The Knowledge page wasn't an advertisement but a fact. InfectionControl.tips is the worlds first pan access platform. It was launched in 2015. 36 countries. Not for
179:
at the talk page. I thank you for your much needed comments. I will try to accomodate your requests as best I can. You are welcome to contribute to the article if you can. I would like to point out that the article is currently under peer review, and as such needs my focus-- reckless as it seems.
92:
There are reasons things are the way they are. I welcome all and any improvements, and I hope you will also. Sudden unexplained changes to an article can be jarring to a reader as well as editors. I don't know everything, but I do know its best to be courteous first than to be bold. Thank you.
1224:. I can provide many examples of this, but perhaps the simplest is your use of the term "purpose built". Please consider why you used this term, and why it reads sounds like advertising. If you are unable to understand this, then I apologize, but maybe you are not ready to edit Knowledge.
160:
have to be discussed first. I welcome any and all feedback regarding the content of my (very minor) changes, but reverting them simply because I did not discuss them first is inappropriate. Looking at the article's talk page, this does not appear to be the first time this has happened.
1172:
Hi Bardi! I am curious as to why the
Collaborator (code review software) was rejected. I work at SmartBear. I would like to understand why this article is seen as an advertisement. If you can help me understand, I'd like to submit a new article for submission if possible. Thank you!
716:
Hey! Moving to draftspace is a perfectly reasonable alternative, and there's no hard and fast policy. There's an art to knowing which to use in any given circumstance — an art that I certainly haven't mastered. As you may have noticed, Tompop888 has gone and added a
1313:, which I misinterpreted, as the vandal/sock mocking the people reverting them, rather than an innocent user commenting. If you are able to provide a source for your edit, that would be great, but it's not the end of the world. I've reported the abusive user to
611:
I might have made a mistake since this is the first time I'm adding a page on
Knowledge.org. If the issue is the "1 million downloads", then the precise number is actually there: 988,397. I could write "over 900,000 downloads" if that's better? Please advise.
1229:
Your comment "I'd like to submit a new article for submission if possible" is a little unclear, and I'd just like to remind you that it's preferable to edit your existing submission and hit the resubmit button, rather than making a duplicate submission.
809:"When providing a third opinion, please remove the listing from this page before you provide your third opinion. Doing so prevents other volunteers from duplicating your effort. Mention in the summary which dispute you have removed and how many remain."
687:
Hey there. I was going to tag that article for CSD, but some part of my deletionist heart thawed and figured a move to drafts would be better. Do you think that would be better than CSD, or should I stick to my guns (for future situations like this)?
1335:
Thanks for the quick and polite reply! Yes, my summary was quite misleading so your eyebrow had all the reasons to be raised :) Speaking of the sock, another one that I can remember right now (there are more, just can't remember names on the spot) is
531:(article space). I'm unable to revert the move. This particular issue may have been fixed by the time an admin gets to this, but is there a way I can cleanup after this sort of thing, i.e. where it's more messy that a simple "move B back to A"?
634:
Hey! I was a little hasty in tagging that article. I've fixed a few issues, and done some cleanup. There's a notability tag at the top of the article that should explain what you can do to improve the article further. Have a great day!
936:
I may have used Wiki upload wizard instead of overwriting files as I wanted to include the caption as part of the image. Would that be a problem? I understand that I need to add the tag "Duplicate" on the old image. Kindly
221:
This artist has performed in television. Someone posted on my talk page that they did a search on this artist and that all they saw was social media. The person who said this is not looking in the right places.
315:
Hi, I realised that when I posted. Just wanted to let you know. It was prodded a few years ago and it looked better then. Still, I've advised the creator about notability so maybe they'll find something.
727:
tag to the page, so they are clearly on the draft-ification side of things. I suspect my CSD rate goes up the more hours I've been watching the new page feed for... It might be time to take a break.
813:
Thanks for contributing to Third
Opinion though, not many people seem to be active on Third Opinion for the last few weeks and it's much appreciated! Just thought I'd let you know. Thank you.
497:
1084:
For the record, this was tagged in discussion with the user, who had created around 5 very similar redirects. Several other CSD tags were accepted, but it's fair that this one wasn't.
546:
Thanks! I spotted the mistake as soon as I had made it, but don't have the powers to undo the move or merge the pages. Meanwhile I also asked an admin for help. Sorry for the mess.
1276:
please explain how did I introduce factual errors in the infobox of this football player when I updated his statistics as of his last match. Also, in my first edit I reverted sock
1317:, but their last edit was a few days ago, and the report may be rejected as stale. If they aren't blocked now, please re-report them if they continue. Sorry for the mix-up.
341:
at some point, so all comments and criticisms are welcome. I didn't think to check the deletion log, which is an interesting point. Do what you will with the article.
180:
I apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Nonetheless, it would appear better on my part to step aside for awhile and simmer down. Thank you once again!——→
144:
scan. I fixed this, and removed the image that was not displaying correctly within the box. You are very welcome to replace the image if you wish. I additionally ran
524:
516:
575:
To complete the record, I've discussed this in IRC, and there doesn't seem anything I can do to fix this sort of issue other than get admin assistance.
1052:
1045:
274:
771:
Indeed, the one article I choose to whack harder than the rest turns out to be created by the one user who might actually write something decent.
355:
All I've done right now is tag it for notability. I might take it to AfD at some point, but I haven't decided. Biting is of course to be avoided.
1200:
434:
338:
1341:
1284:
903:
528:
480:
981:
The old image has been deleted. I've re-edited the infobox though, as that's not the correct way to add a image caption in that case.
237:
1144:
108:
79:
520:
1152:
803:
that you didn't state in your edit summary what the dispute was that you removed and how many remained on the list. Quoted from
1217:
1209:
1135:
1126:
1108:
1070:
835:
Hey! Yep, sorry, I only noticed that after I had made the mistake, but I will keep it in mind for next time. That was my first
1213:
1196:
430:
1358:
1100:
1037:
855:
788:
674:
595:
473:
375:
198:
130:
1203:
in full? I recognise this is a significant amount of words to throw at you, but those documents exist for a reason.
38:
64:
Please explain change to template @ 38th Air
Defense Artillery Brigade. It won't be there long. Did it offend you?
1020:
947:
885:
744:, amirite? But genuinely, I can relate. Sometimes my finger slips and I get a little too Machiavellian. Yikes.
382:
1345:
1322:
1288:
1235:
1089:
986:
911:
844:
776:
732:
640:
580:
536:
442:
346:
302:
166:
47:
17:
1306:
1016:
976:
943:
897:
881:
756:
741:
700:
233:
218:" has been tagged for deletion again even though I have added credible sources and cites my information.
1074:
818:
361:
322:
253:
185:
104:
75:
229:
181:
121:
100:
71:
663:
617:
426:
225:
96:
67:
1190:
1174:
1116:
156:. Specifically, uncontroversial changes, such as fixing a template error and filling out a citation
1349:
1326:
1292:
1277:
1261:
1239:
1182:
1178:
1120:
1093:
1078:
1066:
1024:
990:
951:
927:
Thank you for the prompt response. I have uploaded the new version of the image and replaced it on
915:
889:
848:
822:
759:
736:
703:
681:
667:
644:
621:
584:
570:
555:
540:
464:
456:
446:
420:
412:
404:
398:
390:
364:
350:
325:
306:
256:
241:
189:
170:
153:
141:
112:
83:
602:
425:
I'm not suggesting that the subject of the article is fake. Instead I'm suggesting that it is not
1318:
1300:
1253:
1231:
1085:
982:
907:
840:
772:
728:
653:
636:
576:
532:
460:
438:
408:
394:
342:
298:
293:
for their reasoning when they retagged the page. This, I suppose, was my attempt at implementing
162:
1337:
337:
All good. I'm working at getting my policy knowledge up to scratch, and hopefully applying for
1208:
You are asking
Knowledge – an organisation that's public trust is built on a reputation for a
766:
745:
711:
689:
215:
205:
1257:
830:
814:
356:
332:
317:
264:
248:
145:
1280:, so I actually improved and not the opposite; I have already reinstated the good version.
659:
629:
613:
500:
has been answered. If you need more help or have additional questions, please reapply the
290:
906:), and then ask an admin to delete the old copy (or ping me and I can ask them for you).
1061:
1051:
Hello TheDragonFire. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of
721:
561:
551:
294:
282:
247:
I still don't see evidence of notability and I've pointed the editor to the guideline.
149:
658:
Thank you! Yes, I've already started adding some more references. Appreciate the help!
1314:
286:
269:
I haven't made any comments regarding the article's notability. I simply removed my
1267:
928:
902:
Hey! You'll need to upload a new copy of the image without metadata (you can do so
870:
836:
804:
800:
278:
270:
211:
Not sure if I am contacting you correctly, this is my first article on
Knowledge.
506:
template, or contact the responding user(s) directly on their own user talk page.
46:
If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the
931:
infobox. Could you help me with deleting the old copy? Here is the link to it:
932:
148:
on the article and replaced one bare citation. I would encourage you to read
547:
512:
1055:, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern:
1221:
1250:
I have made changes in the draft as you sai before. can you check it?
140:
parameter, rather than just your username, and this was detected by a
1216:. In this case, your article does not even slightly comply with our
136:
template, as you had incorrectly inserted your signature into the
839:
response, so any and all feedback is very much appreciated. :)
799:
Hi, I noticed that when you removed a dispute from the list at
485:
25:
1057:
Is a plausible, useful redirect or is not a redirect at all.
1160:
1156:
1148:
1140:
1195:
Hello! Can you confirm that you have read
Knowledge's
1107:
Request on 16:42:18, 19 April 2017 for assistance on
297:
for a new user who showed some level of good faith.
1010:Thank you very much. I appreciate your support.
289:are obviously still very possible), and asked
1283:Sorry for any inconvenience, happy editing --
525:User:Amuk/Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (physicist)
521:Knowledge:Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (physicist)
517:User:Amuk/Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (physicist)
8:
89:Please...before making any changes! Comment
560:Looks like Titodutta has moved the files.
223:
94:
65:
1136:Draft:Collaborator (code review software)
527:(the redirect from the previous move) to
1053:Frederick Douglass High School Baltimore
1046:Frederick Douglass High School Baltimore
273:template after I felt that we'd met the
1310:
862:Deleting metadata of a Wikimedia image
523:(a projectspace page), and then moved
44:Do not edit the contents of this page.
7:
1311:Update much, multi-account nuisance?
498:request for help from administrators
1201:paid-contribution disclosure policy
529:Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (physicist)
481:Ramesh Chandra Majumdar (physicist)
24:
965:
489:
435:Knowledge:Existence ≠ Notability
29:
1218:neutral point of view guideline
1197:conflict of interest guideline
431:conflict of interest guideline
275:credible claim of significance
1:
1273:Hello there, from Portugal,
1359:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
1101:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
1038:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
856:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
789:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
675:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
596:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
474:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
376:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
281:was no longer appropriate (
199:User:ClueBot III/ArchiveNow
1375:
1262:07:10, 29 April 2017 (UTC)
1240:08:10, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
1183:16:42, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
1094:12:19, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
1079:02:48, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
1044:Speedy deletion declined:
1025:13:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
991:13:10, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
952:12:50, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
916:08:11, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
890:02:06, 14 April 2017 (UTC)
874:meta-data, if that helps.
849:12:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
823:11:59, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
760:17:02, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
737:16:57, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
704:16:45, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
668:12:39, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
645:12:35, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
622:12:18, 11 April 2017 (UTC)
585:12:19, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
465:06:04, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
447:06:00, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
429:. Please read Knowledge's
413:05:55, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
399:05:46, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
365:14:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
351:14:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
326:13:35, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
307:13:23, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
257:10:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
242:08:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
190:09:49, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
171:00:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
113:14:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
84:13:58, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
1220:, and in fact reads like
869:You made an edit on the
571:19:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
556:10:22, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
541:09:50, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
383:Www.InfectionControl.tips
1350:12:06, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
1327:10:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
1309:used the edit summary:
1293:10:35, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
1111:submission by MSullivan
519:(a userspace draft) to
18:User talk:TheDragonFire
1210:neutral point of view
42:of past discussions.
1214:conflict of interest
1246:Regarding the draft
880:With best regards,
682:The Stanley Dynamic
277:threshold and that
175:Well, at least you
1013:With best regards,
940:With best regards,
214:My article about "
131:under construction
510:
509:
339:new page reviewer
244:
228:comment added by
115:
99:comment added by
86:
70:comment added by
54:
53:
48:current talk page
1366:
1304:
1194:
1165:
1164:
980:
973:
969:
968:
901:
834:
770:
754:
751:
748:
726:
720:
715:
698:
695:
692:
657:
633:
566:
504:
493:
492:
486:
455:Ok. Thank you.
424:
359:
336:
320:
268:
251:
139:
135:
129:
125:
33:
32:
26:
1374:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1305:Hey! Your edit
1298:
1271:
1248:
1188:
1138:
1134:
1113:
1049:
1017:Inclusionforall
977:Inclusionforall
974:
966:
964:
944:Inclusionforall
898:Inclusionforall
895:
882:Inclusionforall
864:
828:
797:
764:
752:
749:
746:
724:
718:
709:
696:
693:
690:
685:
651:
627:
606:
564:
502:
490:
484:
418:
386:
357:
330:
318:
262:
249:
209:
137:
133:
127:
119:
62:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1372:
1370:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1330:
1329:
1270:
1265:
1247:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1226:
1225:
1205:
1204:
1171:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1132:
1112:
1105:
1097:
1096:
1048:
1042:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1014:
1011:
1008:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
957:
956:
955:
954:
941:
938:
934:
925:
919:
918:
863:
860:
852:
851:
796:
793:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
684:
679:
671:
670:
648:
647:
605:
600:
592:
591:
590:
589:
588:
587:
508:
507:
503:{{admin help}}
494:
483:
478:
470:
469:
468:
467:
450:
449:
385:
380:
372:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
328:
310:
309:
208:
203:
195:
194:
193:
192:
61:
58:
56:
52:
51:
34:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1371:
1362:
1360:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1342:193.137.135.2
1339:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1331:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1319:TheDragonFire
1316:
1312:
1308:
1302:
1301:193.137.135.2
1297:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:193.137.135.2
1281:
1279:
1278:User:FonsiFAJ
1274:
1269:
1266:
1264:
1263:
1259:
1255:
1251:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1232:TheDragonFire
1228:
1227:
1223:
1219:
1215:
1211:
1207:
1206:
1202:
1198:
1192:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1142:
1137:
1133:
1131:
1130:
1128:
1125:
1122:
1118:
1115:
1114:
1110:
1106:
1104:
1102:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1086:TheDragonFire
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1076:
1072:
1068:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1054:
1047:
1043:
1041:
1039:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1015:
1012:
1009:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
992:
988:
984:
983:TheDragonFire
978:
972:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
953:
949:
945:
942:
939:
935:
933:
930:
926:
923:
922:
921:
920:
917:
913:
909:
908:TheDragonFire
905:
899:
894:
893:
892:
891:
887:
883:
878:
875:
872:
867:
861:
859:
857:
850:
846:
842:
841:TheDragonFire
838:
832:
827:
826:
825:
824:
820:
816:
811:
810:
806:
802:
795:Third Opinion
794:
792:
790:
778:
774:
773:TheDragonFire
768:
763:
762:
761:
758:
755:
743:
740:
739:
738:
734:
730:
729:TheDragonFire
723:
713:
708:
707:
706:
705:
702:
699:
683:
680:
678:
676:
669:
665:
661:
655:
654:TheDragonFire
650:
649:
646:
642:
638:
637:TheDragonFire
631:
626:
625:
624:
623:
619:
615:
609:
604:
601:
599:
597:
586:
582:
578:
577:TheDragonFire
574:
573:
572:
569:
568:
559:
558:
557:
553:
549:
545:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
533:TheDragonFire
530:
526:
522:
518:
514:
505:
499:
495:
488:
487:
482:
479:
477:
475:
466:
462:
458:
454:
453:
452:
451:
448:
444:
440:
439:TheDragonFire
436:
433:and possibly
432:
428:
422:
417:
416:
415:
414:
410:
406:
401:
400:
396:
392:
384:
381:
379:
377:
366:
363:
360:
354:
353:
352:
348:
344:
343:TheDragonFire
340:
334:
329:
327:
324:
321:
314:
313:
312:
311:
308:
304:
300:
299:TheDragonFire
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
272:
266:
261:
260:
259:
258:
255:
252:
245:
243:
239:
235:
231:
227:
219:
217:
212:
207:
204:
202:
200:
191:
187:
183:
178:
174:
173:
172:
168:
164:
163:TheDragonFire
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
132:
126:I edited the
123:
118:
117:
116:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
90:
87:
85:
81:
77:
73:
69:
59:
57:
49:
45:
41:
40:
35:
28:
27:
19:
1356:
1340:. Cheers! --
1282:
1275:
1272:
1268:Pablo Piatti
1252:
1249:
1170:
1123:
1098:
1060:
1059:Thank you.
1056:
1050:
1035:
970:
929:Malvika Iyer
924:Hello again,
879:
876:
871:Malvika Iyer
868:
865:
853:
812:
808:
798:
786:
767:Thisisnotcam
712:Thisisnotcam
686:
672:
610:
607:
603:WPMobilePack
593:
562:
511:
501:
471:
403:Thank you.
402:
387:
373:
246:
230:Archiveworld
224:— Preceding
220:
213:
210:
196:
176:
157:
154:WP:OWNERSHIP
142:WP:CHECKWIKI
95:— Preceding
91:
88:
66:— Preceding
63:
55:
43:
37:
877:Thank you!
831:Trooper1005
358:Doug Weller
333:Doug Weller
319:Doug Weller
265:Doug Weller
250:Doug Weller
182:StephenTS42
122:StephenTS42
101:StephenTS42
72:StephenTS42
36:This is an
1199:, and the
742:#relatable
660:Cborodescu
630:Cborodescu
614:Cborodescu
608:Hi there!
291:Scottyoak2
1338:User:JAF1
1191:MSullivan
1175:MSullivan
1117:MSullivan
1062:Callanecc
815:-=Troop=-
513:User:Amuk
146:WP:REFILL
1127:contribs
1071:contribs
457:SirWixit
421:SirWixit
405:SirWixit
391:SirWixit
238:contribs
226:unsigned
216:Lil Cory
206:Lil Cory
138:placedby
109:contribs
97:unsigned
80:contribs
68:unsigned
1222:ad copy
1149:history
866:Hello,
427:notable
389:profit
295:WP:BITE
150:WP:BOLD
39:archive
1315:WP:AIV
1254:Gosval
1007:Hello,
567:jones
515:moved
177:looked
158:do not
1157:watch
1153:links
937:help.
837:WP:3O
805:WP:3O
801:WP:3O
722:hasty
496:This
279:WP:A7
271:WP:A7
60:좋은 날!
16:<
1346:talk
1323:talk
1307:here
1289:talk
1258:talk
1236:talk
1179:talk
1161:logs
1145:talk
1141:edit
1121:talk
1090:talk
1075:logs
1067:talk
1021:talk
987:talk
971:Done
948:talk
912:talk
904:here
886:talk
845:talk
819:talk
777:talk
733:talk
664:talk
641:talk
618:talk
581:talk
552:talk
548:Amuk
537:talk
461:talk
443:talk
409:talk
395:talk
362:talk
347:talk
323:talk
303:talk
285:and
283:PROD
254:talk
234:talk
186:talk
167:talk
152:and
105:talk
76:talk
1361:}}
1109:AfC
1103:}}
1040:}}
858:}}
791:}}
677:}}
598:}}
563:Ron
476:}}
378:}}
287:AfD
201:}}
1357:{{
1348:)
1325:)
1291:)
1260:)
1238:)
1181:)
1159:|
1155:|
1151:|
1147:|
1143:|
1129:)
1099:{{
1092:)
1077:)
1073:•
1069:•
1036:{{
1023:)
989:)
950:)
914:)
888:)
854:{{
847:)
821:)
807::
787:{{
757:💬
735:)
725:}}
719:{{
701:💬
673:{{
666:)
643:)
620:)
594:{{
583:)
554:)
539:)
472:{{
463:)
445:)
437:.
411:)
397:)
374:{{
349:)
305:)
240:)
236:•
197:{{
188:)
169:)
134:}}
128:{{
111:)
107:•
82:)
78:•
1344:(
1321:(
1303::
1299:@
1287:(
1256:(
1234:(
1193::
1189:@
1177:(
1163:)
1139:(
1124:·
1119:(
1088:(
1065:(
1019:(
985:(
979::
975:@
946:(
910:(
900::
896:@
884:(
843:(
833::
829:@
817:(
779:)
775:(
769::
765:@
753:ɔ
750:ɐ
747:ɯ
731:(
714::
710:@
697:ɔ
694:ɐ
691:ɯ
662:(
656::
652:@
639:(
632::
628:@
616:(
579:(
565:h
550:(
535:(
459:(
441:(
423::
419:@
407:(
393:(
345:(
335::
331:@
301:(
267::
263:@
232:(
184:(
165:(
124::
120:@
103:(
74:(
50:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.