User talk:The Wookieepedian

3654: 2133:'s article. This could be mis-leading, and I wasn't sure how to handle the clarification, other than possibly with a footnote. As you probably know, only one song on the album, "One of Us Must Know", involved members of The Band, but just Danko and Robertson. Once the sessions moved to Nashville, Robertson was the only Band member to continue in the recordings. Any suggestions? My inclination is to remove it, given that one or two band members doth not a full Band make. 448: 3271: 4064: 3750: 5045: 4884: 4784: 4732: 4602: 4546: 4490: 3705: 3557: 2496: 5101: 4840: 4001: 2933: 2671: 689:, based on lack of source. I did some searching and, of course, found your Wookieepedia page mentioning the removal of the Tannhauser Gate battle scene from the film. I've been unable to find reliable source for this, anything more than blog mentions or the like. If the scene was in the script, and if the original script is available somewhere, this may suffice. Anyway, I thought you might like to look at 4661: 1416: 1191: 766: 3531: 1994: 1931: 4942: 1841: 1775: 1716: 1623: 1686: 1553: 1349: 1303: 876: 4410: 3409: 628: 2256:. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. - 4104: 3724: 5010: 5062:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4901:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4801:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4749:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4621:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4565:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 4509:. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see 423:

status, and I noticed that you have made a substantial amount of contributions recently. If you have time, I would appreciate it if you could help out and improve the article. Right now, the primary thing that needs to be done is the addition of more references – the article simply is not referenced

1498:

will only take a few minutes of your time, and will aid furthering our understanding of online communities, and may assist in the development of tools to assist voters in making RfA evaluations. We are NOT attempting to spam anyone with this survey and are doing our best to be considerate and not

2954:

Hi The Wookieepedian. A few of your recent edits to Harrison album articles have come up on my watch list and I see they're related to changes you've made to the GH template. I'm a bit confused by these – for instance, in a WP:The Beatles talk discussion some time back, Evanh2008 established that

4313:

fandom. I was wondering if I could ask you a few (~10) questions about how fans like yourself aggregate and define "canon" on Knowledge in regards to cultural media objects (e.g. TV shows, movies)? You're under no obligation to say yes, but I just thought I'd ask! I'm sorry that this might seem

2392:, like if a new issue comes out, they'll put the online articles in as many film articles as possible. These should not be included that way since it is a conflict of interest and solicitation to boot. Editors independent of this pattern can include and/or restore references to this periodical. 1907:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can

1486:

early in our project to gain insights into the process. We reviewed what voters discussed about your case, and what qualifications you brought to the table as a candidate. In total 50 cases were personally read and reviewed, and we based our further research questions in part on your case.

3096:

Ah, you beat me to it with starting that article! In fact, I'd long been planning one, offline (it's only been in the planning stages for around, oh, two years now …) So much to say about that tour – it's definitely one I'd like to take to GA sometime. With a lot of work beforehand.

2714:

George is right. It's basically never right to unilaterally reverse the move of an RM. I understand in this case that only one editor's opinion was involved in said RM, but because the article had been the subject of an RM, it needs to be treated as "potentially controversial" per

2636:. Let's get together in person to work on Kentucky-related wikipedia pages, what do you say? If you have any questions, please email the THATCamp KY Organizer, Lee Skallerup Bessette (Morehead State University, @readywriting) at thatcampky@gmail.com. Please sign up to participate 3119:

Back again. With that tour chronology you've added, what's really needed – because the info currently sits under the heading "George Harrison and Ravi Shankar" – is two separate chronologies. One for GH that gives the 1991 Japanese tour; another for Ravi, referring to the earlier

511:, could you write up the section on his mum and maybe other major characters in the TV show? I reckon it would be unencyclopedic to cite the feature length re-edits of the show, because I understand important information was left out when they cut the old Indiana scenes. 853:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 247:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 192:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 137:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 1654:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on 3018:

were full-fledged Harrison releases, just like those experimental works by Lennon. (In fact, more so than the latter, which were Lennon–Ono collaborations, of course.) If in doubt, I really think we ought to run this by the Beatles talk page, you know? Cheers,

2025:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1962:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1806:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 1747:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on 4673:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

4027:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

1873:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 1909: 4983:

and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself.

1579: 929:

of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank

2971:

was indeed a purpose-made soundtrack album, whereas items included in Related Articles are (logically) projects that Harrison worked on with/for others, collaborations, extracurricular activities etc. In other words,

1499:

instrusive in the Knowledge community. The results of this survey are for academic research and are not used for any profit nor sold to any companies. We will also post our results back to the Knowledge community.

4031:

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

4248:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4193:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 4701: 2252: 1260:. However, it's not presently used in any articles. Knowledge policy requires that non-free images be either used or deleted, so if this image isn't used in an article in the next week, it will be deleted. 2152:

tracks except "Sad-Eyed Lady" and "Stuck Inside of Mobile". And Kooper played on all of them except for Robertson's one other tune, "One of Us Must Know", which was Danko's only contribution. The source is

4024: 1897:(just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on 849:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

243:

188:

133:

2021:

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1958:

1802:

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

1743:

1650:

4685:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 891: 293:

I have granted rollback rights to your account, because after a review of some of your contributions it appears that we can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended use of

739:. I noticed it on your "Goals for improvement" list and thought that you might want to help. If you do, let me know on my talk page and we can get started; if not, it's not a big deal. Thanks! 925: 917: 369:. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from 3381: 1363:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also " 79:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

35:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

1567:. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also 3451:. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history. 545:

did some character analysis of the TV show, which I implemented into the character's article: disillusionment in WW1 making him go from "it belongs in a museum" to "fortune and glory".

1578:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1370:

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to

1223:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 798:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 480:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 2806:

to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you.

1448:" link (it is located at the very top of any Knowledge page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any 5022: 2581: 4856: 2695:

You added back "The", violating the latest consensus. Someone else re-dropped it. In order to prevent further incidents like this again, I suggest that you contact the closer,

2250:

article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so,

1219:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

794:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

476:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

333: 1444:

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "

5115: 3388:? The review page has been inactive since I nominated it a week ago, so anything would be appreciated to start the process. If not, feel free to ignore this message. Cheers! 3056: 1163: 601: 2891: 2423:

about which order the band members should be listed in – I'm sure it's an issue that has been raised in the past, but I'd welcome your input if you have time. Many thanks,

3773: 1479: 3052: 3198:

Is it accurate to say that your previous Knowledge account was indeffed? Did you get permission to use another account, or are you evading a block that is still active?

2887: 3923:, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on 894:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 336:. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 1371: 2983:

I could be missing something, I admit, but that's the way I see the distinction. It might be an idea to raise this issue at the project's talk page, do you think?

2801: 4961: 4957: 2309: 2157:(one of many of his links). I'm fairly certain other Dylan editors would reject this as a Band collaboration, so if you don't mind, I'll remove the reference. 4128: 3865: 3284: 2065: 1437:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

1212:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

787:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

469:

if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Knowledge (see

2305: 1433:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 1208:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 783:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 465:, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Knowledge. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. 3124:

tour of Europe. Any idea how to go about that, to have two tour chronologies, but neither of them actually follow the wording of the infobox's artists for

2534: 2015: 1952: 1796: 1737: 1644: 1100: 1090: 1038: 1028: 976: 966: 843: 237: 182: 127: 71:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 27:. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at 2838: 3121: 4013: 3965: 3619: 3320: 3066: 2901: 2848: 2762: 2544: 2530: 2465: 2319: 2070:

to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

3104:, as far as I can tell (with an en between their names, not a hyphen or minus sign) – but how do I change it to that wording, do you know? Cheers, 2834: 1317: 3413: 3169: 2022: 1959: 1803: 1744: 1651: 1445: 1220: 850: 795: 477: 374: 244: 189: 134: 3010:

etc appear under an "Experimental" field there – they're not buried away in "Related". That treatment on Temp:Lennon seems logical, I think, and

380:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our

373:

is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Knowledge policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an

3916: 5074: 4931: 4913: 4813: 4761: 4633: 4577: 4521: 4445: 2589: 2026: 1963: 1830: 1807: 1748: 1655: 1453: 1228: 854: 803: 485: 381: 370: 248: 193: 138: 83: 76: 39: 32: 4968:, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under 4358: 3961: 3920: 3880: 3864:

to the talk pages of all Beatles-related articles. Send a newsletter to members, canvas for new members and coordinate tasks. Enter articles

3615: 3316: 3156: 3062: 2897: 2844: 2758: 2540: 2461: 2315: 586: 4715: 4386: 4273: 4218: 3927:

and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my

3246: 2361:

and their Hall of Fame induction, I don't believe those constitute collaborations. Accompaniment and collaboration are not the same thing.

1155: 578: 75:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

31:

carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at

3164: 3149: 2752: 2455: 5120: 4965: 4861: 4453: 3270: 2034: 1971: 1811: 1752: 1659: 1268: 1140: 1117: 1055: 993: 858: 385: 305: 252: 197: 142: 87: 43: 4287:

Hello! I don't believe we've ever interacted before (and if we have, my apologies). I'm Gen. Quon, and I'm a user pretty active in the

5018: 5002: 4953: 3769: 2748: 2451: 1693: 1167: 569: 561: 365:. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by 4305:

fandoms. Anyway, I'm currently in grad school working on an MA thesis on Knowledge, fandom, and canon, and I saw on the talk page of

4344: 3796: 3781: 3672: 3664: 3510: 2277: 2030: 1967: 3859: 3309:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to

2645: 2388:, if you endorse the use of that reference, then that is fine. I came across a few accounts that were basically only referencing 1791:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

1732:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

1639:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

838:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

664: 232:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

177:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

122:

but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge constitutes fair use. Please go to

82:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

38:

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our

4711: 4372: 4269: 4214: 3811: 3242: 3229: 1542: 1430: 1338: 5106: 5092: 3059:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2894:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2841:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2755:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2537:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2458:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2312:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 23: 3958:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3612:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 3313:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 2637: 2611: 4980: 4949: 4935: 2570: 2010:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 1947:, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Knowledge is acceptable. Please go to 647: 508: 3277: 839: 830: 822: 771: 4793: 4694: 3762: 3040: 2797: 2061: 1850: 309: 4893: 4260:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

4205:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

2668:

that was superceded by the PNG version, uploaded by someone else, who is inactive since last month. There is this one:

600:

for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at

5058:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4897:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4797:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4745:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4706: 4617:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4561:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4505:. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 4449: 4265: 4210: 4082: 3828: 3328: 2959:

should be shown as Harrison's first studio album. Along with that, there's now misrepresentation on the template with

2879: 2641: 655: 4846: 4831: 300:: and believe you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see 5063: 5059: 4902: 4802: 4750: 4622: 4566: 4510: 3500:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks!

3233: 2595: 2401: 2057: 1560: 1438: 1356: 1213: 883: 788: 470: 366: 301: 72: 28: 5054: 2793: 1689: 1678: 954: 4422: 4417: 4352: 4017: 2980:

were releases under his own name and so should be included among those uppermost fields in the template, surely.

2689: 1313: 887: 609: 329: 4613: 2577: 377:; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. 274:

Sorry about that, but if you're reacting to that... I do agree, yes, some editors seem unable to read at times.

5110: 5109:

has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

4851: 4850:

has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the

4380: 3310: 2366: 2106: 2011: 2002: 1857: 1792: 1783: 1425:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1200:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 1153: 775:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 643: 550: 531: 516: 457:. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Knowledge under a 393: 279: 95: 51: 1252: 123: 114: 106: 3950:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3604:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

3039:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2878:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2825:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2739:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2665: 2521:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

2442:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1564: 1546: 1196: 4557: 4436: 4431: 4427: 3836: 3734: 3458: 3100:

Thanks for your comment about retitling. Thing is, I'm totally ignorant of the process. The title should be

2658: 2420: 1532: 1522: 2281: 1948: 1939: 1078: 890:. I do not think that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 4163: 4077: 3713: 2362: 2075: 1913: 1700: 1421: 1016: 906: 747: 651: 332:. I do not feel that this article satisfies Knowledge's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at 5113:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

4854:

guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at

4741: 4682: 4474: 4395: 4338: 3787: 3605: 3506: 3463: 3222: 2585: 2297: 1733: 1724: 862: 233: 224: 216: 1603:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1395:. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. -- 1175: 361: 67: 5025:

until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion.

4501: 712:

is mentioned is one of my favorite movies scenes of all time. And I'm over three times your age.... --

453: 178: 169: 161: 5030: 4348: 3924: 3709: 3483: 2999: 2273: 2097: 2091: 1979: 1878: 1760: 1667: 1640: 1631: 1608: 1568: 1400: 1125: 1063: 1001: 605: 325: 260: 205: 150: 2674:

It is free to use without problems, so I guess the non-free image may fail to be "irreplaceable". --

4376: 4366: 4321: 4261: 4206: 3879:

If you complete one of these tasks, please remove it from the list and add your achievement to the

3842: 3653: 3468: 3183: 2811: 2704: 2679: 2102: 2042: 1316:. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at 1287: 1148: 694: 546: 527: 512: 432: 389: 296: 275: 91: 47: 3936: 3928: 3681: 3295: 2522: 2416: 2261: 1822: 1788: 1729: 1636: 1528: 1328: 938: 835: 659: 229: 174: 119: 5014: 3389: 3228:

or as one of the commenters on it's talk page, I would like to inform you that there has been a

1093:

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

1031:

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

969:

linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

1884:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1494:

we are conducting to get perspective from people who have participate in the RfA process. The

5128: 4869: 4669: 4651: 4237: 4228: 4182: 4173: 4159: 4108: 4046: 3981: 3912: 3635: 3494: 3448: 3432: 3424: 3366: 3252: 3178: 3082: 2917: 2864: 2826: 2778: 2560: 2481: 2335: 2180: 2162: 2138: 2071: 1697: 902: 742: 2511: 4678: 4469: 4459: 4390: 4334: 4257: 4241: 4202: 4186: 4133: 3730: 3501: 3488: 2719:. Given the dearth of participation, opening a new RM to restore the "The" would be fine. -- 2582:

Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2013 March 13#Category:Firefly (TV series) fan films

2229: 2221: 2206: 2198: 2125: 2110: 1589:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1381:

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the

1205: 780: 619:

MTV may have gotten there first, but darn it if you aren't getting some more belated medals!

462: 447: 4693:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4256:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4201:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 4115:

that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

2033:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

1970:

and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the

5082: 5026: 4921: 4821: 4769: 4641: 4585: 4529: 4306: 4063: 4008: 3992: 3818: 3417: 3393: 3113: 2447: 1975: 1917: 1756: 1663: 1604: 1461: 1396: 1360: 1342: 1264: 1236: 1121: 1113: 1059: 1051: 997: 989: 811: 709: 493: 256: 201: 146: 3155:

to The Wookieepedian: Excellent work on the Star Wars articles! Have a Barnstar! (See:

2148:

Thanks for the quick reply. Out of curiosity, I looked it up. Robertson appeared on all

4690: 4362: 4316: 4301: 4253: 4245: 4198: 4190: 4151: 4120: 3804: 3749: 3587: 3579: 3541: 3444: 3349: 3334: 3175: 3152: 3133: 3109: 3024: 2988: 2940: 2807: 2700: 2675: 2507: 2428: 2397: 2038: 2007: 1944: 1434: 1284: 1257: 1209: 1086: 1024: 962: 784: 690: 686: 679: 466: 428: 1559:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

1490:

In continuing our research, I would like to personally invite you to participate in a

1355:

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for

4969: 4686: 4249: 4194: 3972: