1922:
separately? Finally, I re-inserted Sarah Palin as a potential candidate based on a more specific citation. There is legitimate speculation that she moved to
Arizona to run for Senate, and just because she didn't run in 2012 doesn't mean she's not running in 2016, especially since she went on the record two days ago saying that she hopes to run for office again in the future. After reviewing your editing history, I can see that I've benefited (as a reader) from your work on these election pages in the past. Thank you for your contributions. I am a relatively new editor on here and would appreciate any advice or tips you might be able to offer.
2618:
3874:, where the Reform candidate with 1.07% of the vote represented the margin that the winner of a plurality needed to obtain a majority—also forcing the matter to the legislature. Do you see a difference between that situation and the one under discussion? If not, it would seem that you would either concur with the Mississippi model and agree to it for Vermont or protest it at that article's talk page. Your reply would be most helpful at Talk:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014#Libertarian candidate, where the Mississippi model has already been mentioned. Sincerely,
2526:
441:
2943:
2008:…supporting me in the reversion of the text that prematurely declared victory in the Rauner article, which was based on evening news reports/projections, and not on official election results. While the outcome reported will likely prove correct, it was, as it appeared, completely unsourced, based only <100% precincts reporting, and in a context of an opponent who has not yet conceded. Thank you for reviewing the matter.
1688:
1470:
3240:
4053:
3995:
2685:
2278:
2133:
3580:. Even more so, the only discussion about changing the Sean Haugh page to a redirect took place in 2014 when the page was completely different and lacked proper sourcing. Being that this article is significantly different than before and is very arguably notable I am restoring and suggest you put the page up for a deletion discussion or a discussion of some sort to bring a consensus to the argument as per
3891:
3693:
725:. The editor made changes that are contray to how all the other election articles are formatted, and although not a big deal, when I tried to revert the changes, the editor keeps reverting, and has accused me of disruptive editing, even though I am changing it back to the normal way to match all other websites. Mind weighing in, regardless if you agree with me or not? Thank you, and all the best!
3422:
2457:
failing to get enough signatures or some other reason but did not "withdraw", so your statement that "just declared, withdrew, potential and decliend" (sic) is used is incorrect. I did correct the problem with the heading's format, but the fact that "Former" is rarely used as a heading in election articles does not mean it should not be used when it is appropriate.--
2229:
3805:
3351:
3467:, and made several constructive edits to the article. If it wouldn't be too much trouble, could I ask you to pay some attention to that article again? I won't describe the situation (apart from noting that I unthinkingly violated 3RR), lest I seem to be pushing my point of view; but another editor's input would be useful. —
2388:
national press will dedicate thousands of hours and pages to studying absolutely anything they do, but a smaller club like City will always have trouble proving notability for any match that doesn't already involve those clubs - especially when the match happened before our rise to success a few years back.
1885:
pdf has the numbers associate with the additional 100 respondents (4.4% MOE) which are the numbers from which you changed (36 45 11). Personally, I would like to see both toplines reflected in the graph but if only one, I must insist that the numbers are associated with the corresponding MOE. Thanks.
3815:
regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about
2589:
form of government. The Dallas mayor is one of 15 city council members elected. Though only the mayor is elected citywide and the other 14 council members by district, the mayor has much less power than in other big cities. Acoordingly, I believe that the entire municipal election, both mayor and the
2364:
Hey. Thanks for the comment. I'll be straight up with you - the reason that that page even exists on my user subspace is because I salvaged it right as the original article was being deleted. The reason that there are not one or two but thirteen individual citations for the claim that it was (one of)
786:
details that if content that some might find objectionable is included because it is relevant, then it is not censored. In this case, as in the case of Mel Gibson etc, the quote is relevant and so it is included, uncensored. Something being objectionable is not in itself reason to remove it or censor
563:
you'll see she was at 5% and other was at 2%, which were the numbers they gave. For whatever reason, they decided to remove her numbers from that poll even though it was taken when she was still in the race, although I don't know why her numbers only moved the "other" category from 2 to 6. I can only
4083:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of
3038:
footballer should contain what made them notable. Then any non-notable jobs that they do after finishing with notable footballing activities go in the prose. I wouldn't write "Fred Bloggs is a shoe salesman and former footballer who made 300 appearances in the
Football League and played 13 times for
2778:
Wondering what your rationale is for deleting declared independent candidate
Mikelis Beitiks from the "United States Senate election in California, 2016" page is. I can infer from your edit that you don't think a candidate's website declaring himself a candidate is a valid source, but I am wondering
1961:
Thank you for your kind words as well. Thank you also for re-inserting the Tea Party opposition sentence. I do think that helps, although I'm still not totally satisfied with the summary section. I will continue to monitor the race and add content as more concrete media coverage is published. Just a
1900:
Ah yes, so they are. Corrected. As the only difference between the samples is 100 extra respondents and the numbers are almost identical, I don't think it's worth including both sets of numbers. If it was the difference between LV and RV, yes, but between 400 LV and 500 LV, it doesn't seem worth it.
1305:
Thanks. I see what you mean. In my research I noticed that opposing witnesses focus on different things. I was trying to make a note of it, without the momentary interruptions which can derail the train of thought, or words like "according to such and such" which create the aura of ambivalence... as
3607:
I woke up and logged on this a.m. to find a note from GAB that I'd posted to a closed SPI discussion. Somehow, the closed discussion had popped up on my watchlist as if it were current. I wrote this to GAB and will include
MelanieN and the other editors whom I'd pinged on my edit. Thanks. I somehow
2456:
It really doesn't matter if "Former" is used as a heading elsewhere, as it is a rare occurrence that an announced candidate dies before the primary. I'm sure it could be found, but that's not really relevant. "Removed" is used in election articles, for candidates who are removed from the ballot for
1884:
Hi, you recently changed the polling for the 2014 Mass Gov Race. Your numbers are incorrect. You used the
Coakley 37%, Baker 46% undecided 8% which is from the 400 sample (initial topline). This must be accompanied by a change to the margin of error placing it at 4.9%. The supplemental topline
1186:
Just wondering, what is the "criteria" for a candidate to be listed in red & thus to appear as the front runner, also should I put a note by the Harper Poll due to the leader in the other 3 polls Mike
Huckabee being excluded as it may be confusing for readers to see him going from 1st to 1st to
933:
Well, I was kind of grateful since it allowed me to see the content they deleted without having to click through the history, but that's between you, me, and the lamp post. Let me give you one more piece of advice. It is very helpful (for admin schmucks like me) if there are clear indications given
698:
Solis has been one of the very few, one of the extremely rare politicians that has advocated policy that actually benefits the citizens of our country which did not merely divert more of our taxes to already wealthy corporate criminals. I can't stand politicians, I don't vote, they're all criminals
540:
Can you provide a link showing where you get the number for
Bachman for the Gallup poll with the Dec 28-Jan 4 dates? For that polling period, it looks like they moved her into the "other" category, which jumped from 2% to 6% all of a sudden. I don't think having the "other" category at 6% and her
3637:
of over 14,000 pages, by far the worst since 2011, and we need an all out drive to get this back down to just a few hundred that can be easily maintained in the future. Unlike AfC, these pages are already in mainspace, and the thought of what might be there is quite scary. There are also many good
2917:
Tiller54 I know you had nothing to do with it, but Brenda
Lawrence (D) (Michigan's 14th Congressional District) had uploaded an official public domain portrait, but was removed for some reason. It should not have been removed since it was from the office of Brenda Lawrence. I was just wondering if
2433:
Me and
Falstur created the article a few years back but it was swiftly removed for not being notable enough bizarrely. As Falstur says, there are a powerful group of "deletionists" (or vandals as I have come to call them) who delete what they want. It's the reason why I (mostly) quit editing a few
1202:
Hi there. No, it's not necessary to include a note. Polling companies will include various speculated, confirmed and possible candidates. It doesn't matter which ones they include or don't include because no-one has any idea who will actually run. All we do is record the information, regardless of
760:
Hello , I know
Knowledge (XXG) doesn't censor but if I were to walk up to someone and say "Fuck off ya Paki bastard", I'd probably get done in ... So why should it be allowed on here ? ... Everyone of different natures visit Knowledge (XXG) and to see what she said I'd imagine would offend people?
694:
Thanks for the update to the Hilda Solis page. Even though it was very minor it is undeniable that "debate" was not the best choice of wording for the massive protests. What they had in Wisconsin was a hand full of corrupt corporate criminals committing treason against our country lined up against
2387:
is that matches doesn't just need to be notable, they need to be continuously cited by the press or reliable sources in order to prove its lasting notability. This means that games involving United, Arsenal, Liverpool and to a lesser extent Chelsea have a number of articles about them because the
1288:
Hi there. Perhaps the sentences could be re-worded? "In his testimony, Guard x said..." or "according to survivor x..." The way it was made it look really odd and some might find it more confusing than helpful, particularly if it's just a surname eg: "It was a horrible sight (Wiernik)..." In this
3645:
can occasionally be somewhat more challenging than AfC, the criteria for obtaining the right are roughly the same. The Page Curation tool is even easier to use than the Helper Script, so it's likely that most AfC reviewers already have more than enough knowledge for the task of New Page Review.
1742:
to a redirect without discussion and without merging the information into the destination page. Could you point to the policy about political candidates that led you to make that redirect? Third-party US gubernatorial candidates intuitively seem notable to me, but I want to check before I make
1937:
Hi. First of all, thanks for your kind words. I removed the summary of the polls for two reasons: I think it's too specific for the lead of an article and I think it lends undue weight to a single poll, particularly the Republican primary poll, which was conducted for "Citizens United Political
2391:
Now you've raised it, and I realise it's been more than four years since it was last deleted, I'm tempted to try again. At the very least I'll work on the article and expand it somewhat to make it more presentable. But I have to say that I have suspicions over whether it won't just be hit with
1576:
Hello, and thank you for all your hard work maintaining articles about elections! This is a valuable service you provide at Knowledge (XXG). But I have a quibble with regard to your recent edits at the California gubernatorial election article, where you restored two reference citations I had
1921:
Please explain your deletion of almost all my edits on this page. As you now have it, the page seems to lack proper summary. Regarding your contention that candidates should be listed alphabetically, I can see now that your way correct, but shouldn't the incumbent be listed either first or
1382:
Out of curiosity, since I don't know the standard, is it standard to include "leaners" in the final numbers of how a poll is reported here on Wiki? I ask, because I posted the poll, but pushing leaners seems as if this wouldn't be standard for how polls are added to wiki. Just curious.
3903:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
938:, which basically requires that it's clear there's an intent to disrupt) correctly. So, "Revert vandalism: repeated changes to numbers without any kind of verification" is better. That makes it easier on us, which makes everything easier--then we know what to look for. Happy editing,
1270:
by both, Holocaust survivors, as well as convicted war-criminals, trying to influence the perceptions of others. I think it makes sense to separate who said what, by mentioning their names at the end of a sentence. Please let me know, if you have a better suggestion. Thanks,
1970:. Again, I will continue to monitor media coverage and as soon as her potential candidacy is covered by a reliable source I will re-insert in both articles. It's only a matter of tim. Thank you for your assistance and patience, and I look forward to future collaboration.
1430:, thank you for putting my change in the main body. Though your "completely unnecessary" comment is a bit dickish, since you took the content I added and moved it into a different section. I think providing the date of the primary wasn't completely unnecessary. --
2817:
exception for questionable and self-published sources. That being said, you seem to be somewhat of a moderator for this page and I acknowledge that such a citation would be an aberration, so I won't go to edit war, I'll just ask you to reconsider. Best wishes.
4019:
until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
3306:
In fact, quite a bit of that content needs removed. There is more on her page about the election than the election page itself. As soon as I get the time this week I will take a closer look and would welcome your feedback on the talk page of the article.
589:
3705:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
3207:
630:
I believe it's common practice not to repeat the year if someone served in an office in the same year: 15 January - 28 November 1991 as opposed to 15 January 1991 - 28 November 1991. I might be wrong though. It's not a big deal either way, really.
2171:
2085:
1820:
The article did have a reference. But isn't it normal to add a template requesting more to be added? If you think the character herself is wholly non-notable, and no supporting sources could be found, wouldn't it be more appropriate to raise an
2727:
286:
Hey there. I'm normally skeptical about people that primarily do cleanup edits, but I just wanted to say that the edit you made there (as well as on other Watford players I have watchlisted) was top notch. Keep up good work! Regards,
2539:
2497:
3285:. The content I removed - which you just added back - is not what the source says. Adding this type of content to a BLP is damaging to the subject and to Knowledge (XXG). If you are going to add content, please keep in mind
645:
Argh, you're right; sorry, I looked at it in the diff view and saw the two dates on different lines (in which case it'd be useful to note the year), but the template displays them next to each other. I'll revert now :).
801:
Hi Tiller54, Okie dokie thanks for that, I best go & edit Mel Gibson too lol, I would still revert it but I really cannot be bothered to have an argument over something petty lol so i'll just leave it anyway thanks
2316:
603:
This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Knowledge (XXG) and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.
3931:
3733:
4023:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
3105:
3159:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
447:
440:
1946:
isn't a reliable source. It's a website where people publish their opinions and other people vote on them. Thanks for your contributions, particularly to the 2016 Senate elections page, that was very helpful.
4080:
1289:
case: "he would be called "clepsydra" (water clock) in the camp language (Max Bielas)", some might assume that "Max Bielas" is the name of the camp language. If re-wording isn't an option, perhaps footnotes?
781:
Hi Davey, I'm sure some people might be offended by it but that's not really the point. Mel Gibson's article contains his various racist quotes too and I'm sure people might be offended by that too. However,
3966:
1938:
Victory Fund", which doesn't exactly like McCain. I actually meant not to remove what you added about him facing opposition from the Tea Party, so I'll add that back in now. As for listing candidates, per
718:
Hello there! I would like to ask you to weigh in, as a frequent editor of election related articles, to a dispute over the way an editor has changed the format of the external link candidate websites. See
2812:
Thanks for the quick response. I respectfully disagree with your assessment. I believe that in the context of this article, Beitiks' website declaration meets all five criteria for validation under the
2918:
you could upload the photo back to her page, I really appreciate it. I asked you because you're an experienced Knowledge (XXG) editor. Have a nice day, and a good Memorial Day weekend. -Spongebob1944
2383:
who believe that Knowledge (XXG) should only contain articles that can unquestionable justify their presence there, especially with regards to individual football matches, and their interpretation of
3915:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
3717:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1445:
By "completely unnecessary", I was referring to your adding of another heading of "==Primaries==" on top of the Democratic and Republican primaries. But yes, thanks for providing the primary date.
3630:
As an AfC reviewer you're probably aware that a new user right has been created for patrolling new pages (you might even have been granted the right already, and admins have it automatically).
3486:
Please do not alter his quote, which are his own words. You cannot alter a person's words, no matter if it is wrong or not. This is why I have put the note in place to make it clear. Thanks.
1306:
if there was anything wrong with what they said. – Perhaps footnotes would be the best answer; I don't know. The actual names would probably require a direct quote which isn't needed either.
3071:
1984:
Thanks, I missed that she was still on the main 2016 page. I don't expect there'll be as much speculation about her running as there was in 2012, but it's always worth keeping an eye out.
3863:, in a manner that guides us towards consensus, which probably will require compromise. It would be good, if you left your summary of the issues in the space provided under your name at:
3003:
1942:, they're all alphabetised, though we do put the incumbents first in polling tables, for ease of access. I looked for a reliable source for Palin but couldn't find one and unfortunately
669:
2395:
Incidentally, I'm curious as to how you found that page. I don't advertise my subspace except on my own user page, and I tend to believe that no-one but me ever reads what's in there.
33:
2376:, because they were both removed from Knowledge (XXG) at about the same time and we both wanted to keep them for a point in the future when people were more willing to accept them.
3829:
Howdy. If you're no longer interested in participating in the discussion at the page-in-question, or don't want to participate at the Dispute board. Then, perhaps you shouldn't be
520:
Hello. I agree with you, I've never heard of that source being used before and it's clearly nothing more than self-promotion. He seems to have given up now, though. Happy to help!
2434:
years ago. It's not a democracy at all - Knowledge (XXG) has become a backwards dictatorship led by a untouchable minority who don't have the project's best interests at heart.
3608:
didn't realize that the discussion was closed. I apologize. Activist (talk) 14:06, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Activist (talk) 15:52, 29 October 2016 (UTC) (One last note to write.)
3059:
1023:
Oh, I see. I moved it back up because: a) it allows the reader's eyes to skip down to the active polling; and b) it lets editors edit the section of the active polling alone.—
988:
2889:
2882:
1743:
hasty reverts. Otherwise, a fair portion of the article I created would be good to have on the destination article anyway, so I am going to begin the merge either way.
2476:
is to mention declared candidates who died before the election at the top of the section. This also means that when more information becomes available, it can be added.
2181:
1825:
where a merge could be discussed. No strong views, personally, and the article looks a bit lightweight, but just asking. The article has been there for over four years?
2922:
Hi Spongebob1944. I'd help out but I don't really upload photos, and I wouldn't know where to go to get an official one to be honest! Thanks for the note though. Best,
322:
The articles do not mention explicitly that both candidates could run for president in 2012, but rather said both have political ambitions, which could mean anything.--
2164:
2151:
2074:
4016:
1085:
Thanks good catch, I totally missed that, a quick look and thought it was the same person changing their vote didn't realize they had deleted someone else's vote. --
668:
Hi, I know that you add polls to a lot of the election pages and I was wondering what your view is with regards to partisan polls. There is currently a discussion at
2737:
2892:, which brings the opinions expressed into question. Please indicate if this assertion in any way affects your position with respect to the proposed move. Cheers!
1780:
Understood. The information that concerned me is about the court case and Board of Elections decision, which is not currently covered in the destination article.
1036:
Yeah, b) is the problem when the polling table has the most recent poll at the bottom. The other pages have the most recent polls at the top so it's not an issue.
1125:
2638:
695:
millions of citizens who turned out when time and circumstance allowed to oppose the Wall Street corporate criminals and traitors that Scott Walker works for.
2326:
1578:
4087:
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit
4069:
4006:
2712:
2703:
3864:
3812:
2750:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2365:
the best cup comebacks ever is because of a last-ditch desperate attempt to prove the article's validity that I eventually gave up on. You'll notice that
2339:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
2194:
if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the
1050:
I don't see why the polling order matters. When an editor uses the section edit feature, it's nice not to have the hypothetical polling code in the way.—
505:. The editor is putting in unreputable sources for self-promotion. It seems other edits per past edits agree, but I suppose that's not enough. Thank you!
934:
as to why something is vandalism--edit summaries are a good tool for that. "Revert vandalism" means little, esp. since not everyone uses the definition (
41:
105:
3860:
3817:
3426:
1121:
195:
392:
My mistake, I was adding his career totals and added up Soccerbase wrong, and added 1 to it for the missing game, getting 92. Have corrected it now.
3871:
3429:
for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can
3097:
1059:
Well, when the most recent polling is at the top, the hypothetical polling isn't in the way and you don't have to scroll down to edit it, either :)
219:
2646:
2642:
2625:
1570:
1322:
I think the best thing to do is to just modify the references so that it's clear who said what. That would negate the need for lengthy footnotes.
2844:
infobox. Should articles covering previous years be in the same format, or is that something unique for the current year article? For example,
2637:. You received this invitation because of your history editing articles related to her. The WikiProject Hillary Clinton group discussion is
1640:(cur | prev) 22:02, 16 March 2013 Tiller54 (talk | contribs) . . (44 bytes) (+44) . . (←Redirected page to Jay and Silent Bob Strike Back)
1266:
The article is controversial; some details may sound extreme (or even obscene) if mentioned so matter-of-factly. Statements were made during
3416:
3945:
3853:
3789:
3747:
3673:
3412:
3405:
3337:
3330:
3184:
3020:
3012:
2942:
2655:
Thanks for your consideration, and please note that joining this project is in no way an endorsement of HRC or her political positions. ---
2305:
2296:
2105:
1967:
1963:
2747:
2336:
2191:
1859:
2959:
With only a couple hours per week, you can make a big difference for sharing knowledge. Please sign up and help us in one of these ways:
50:
or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
2845:
2841:
454:
3770:
for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See
3070:
in the last six months, I'd like to invite you to a discussion about the use of honorifics in those lists. The discussion is happening
1794:
I guess that could be transferred over, but it doesn't seem that consequential really. I wouldn't object if you were to do it, though.
3289:. Also, please refrain from stating something that is not in the reference you cite. You can also use the talk page for discussion. --
2617:
413:
3638:
faith article creators who need a simple, gentle push to the Tea House or their pages converted to Draft rather than being deleted.
3093:
264:
128:
1399:
47:
3354:
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period.
904:
I've blocked this editor, but please don't revert them if they blank their own talk page: they are perfectly entitled to do so.
146:
3941:
3785:
3743:
3669:
3180:
3016:
1007:
Hi there. I just moved the hypothetical polling to below the Brown/Warren polling, like it is on all the other election pages.
549:
3924:
3726:
740:
Hello, thanks for the notification. I agree with you as it happens and I've added my thoughts to the talk page. Thanks again,
100:
3067:
2823:
2784:
2214:
2023:
Sorry, didn't see this in time, but yes, you're correct in saying that Knowledge (XXG) shouldn't pre-empt official results.
200:
3063:
1658:
3766:
are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on
2691:
2411:
Ah OK, I see. Bradford's comeback win against Chelsea seems to have resulted in more coverage of this match, for example
2284:
2139:
224:
2798:. Please familiarise yourself with that policy, which lays out what is deemed a reliable source and what isn't. Cheers.
2373:
2370:
1601:
1403:
4073:
4065:
4028:
You made some edits in 2014, but you are one of the few people who has edited in the past 7 years so just reaching out.
4010:
3171:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
848:
about including intrade predictions in an election article. Just would like to see what other editors feel. Thank you!
151:
4088:
3936:
3738:
3176:
425:
2081:
3430:
3039:
Wales", and I suspect you wouldn't either. So why force "sports agent", another non-notable job, in there? cheers,
2751:
2733:
2663:
2340:
2322:
2195:
2177:
1541:
887:
3401:
3326:
2185:
1975:
1927:
1890:
1388:
259:
As a frequent editor of American politics, I would appreciate if you put your two cents into the debate over the
1581:. I am not as familiar with this type of article as you are, and really need guidance how to proceed. Thanks! --
846:
175:
95:
90:
3267:
3224:
2819:
2780:
2310:
2104:
Hi, thanks for that and the kind words. It's something I've never done before but I might have a go at it with
1867:
1830:
1151:
edit, which undid my mistake. I must have been looking at the wrong date formats when I made my edit. Regards,
1090:
3912:
3867:—it is a forum for mediating disagreements among editors, not a court where one passively awaits a judgment.
3714:
3282:
2630:
2384:
783:
2741:
3974:
3449:
3370:
1862:
where there is a substantial description of the character? Evenso, what's now been lost? It's hard to tell.
723:
2814:
1759:
377:
say 94, but that includes his 3 playoff appearances, consistent with the FLPTV sites' house style. cheers,
180:
3261:
Unilateral removal of the entire article without going through a proper deletion process is inappropriate.
2684:
2473:
2277:
2132:
1971:
1923:
1609:
1051:
1024:
998:
421:
61:
3172:
1962:
note, based on your feedback about Sarah Palin as a candidate, I am removing the reference to her in the
230:
185:
3969:
I am informing you because you appear to have made a number of edits to at least one of these articles.
2696:
2656:
2415:/. I came across it on Google. Search for "Spurs 3 Man City 4" and it's the first result that comes up.
2289:
2144:
2013:
1156:
488:
3503:
The quote is not being altered, we're just choosing not to include some of it. Hence the ellipses. See
236:
123:
2865:
Yeah, there should be an infobox. A lot of mayoral elections pages are barely more than stubs though.
2330:
484:
3634:
3593:
3523:
3488:
3472:
1886:
1384:
1312:
1277:
1192:
704:
327:
292:
272:
3899:
3701:
3683:
3256:
3148:
3139:
4098:
3263:
3220:
3203:
2596:
2439:
2048:
1863:
1826:
1508:
1133:
1086:
853:
811:
770:
730:
651:
620:
510:
466:
374:
3908:
3710:
3569:
3168:
3152:
935:
699:
and traitors but some of them on rare occasion throw citizens a bone with some usable meat on it.
3970:
3613:
3554:
3445:
3440:
3381:
3366:
3361:
3312:
3294:
3044:
2208:
2093:
1586:
1544:
1435:
1232:
382:
3345:
3286:
2500:
up to date. I would be a great addition to have the date column to sort properly. Possible? -
2089:
2088:. I encourage you to nominate any other articles you create or expand significantly, that meet
4033:
3838:
3248:
2721:
2548:
2525:
2506:
2462:
2242:
1705:
1652:
1605:
1355:
362:
58:
3920:
3722:
3650:
3164:
3156:
1350:
Thanks for the RFPP. Know of anymore sources for that bit? Might help to have others. Cheers
366:
3962:
2902:
2369:
and I both have near the exact same article for this match saved on our subspaces, and also
2159:
2009:
1785:
1748:
1267:
1152:
997:— what changes did it make? The "Difference between revisions" isn't clear, unfortunately.—
971:
943:
909:
51:
3923:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3916:
3781:
3725:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3718:
3658:
3654:
3642:
3585:
3581:
3577:
3573:
3549:
without the hyphenation is normal American usage. It looks weird, but it is what it is. --
3167:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
3160:
2950:
2092:, yourself, and thank you for your work on this and many other election articles! Cheers, —
1841:
1822:
868:
3875:
3821:
3589:
3468:
3113:
2634:
1483:
1307:
1272:
1188:
700:
677:
323:
288:
268:
3341:
2795:
1858:
Some kind of discussion, somewhere, might have been useful? Why did you not re-direct to
370:
1687:
4093:
4060:
4044:
3252:
3243:
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Knowledge (XXG), as you did to
3199:
3194:
How margin of error works — Statewide opinion polling, Democratic Party primaries, 2016
3100:. We already had a debate about whether the article should be kept, and the result was
2855:
2591:
2435:
2397:
2366:
2044:
1492:
1469:
1129:
881:
849:
803:
762:
726:
647:
616:
544:
506:
462:
2730:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
2319:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
2174:. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page
4001:
3985:
3609:
3568:
The sources provided in the article and those available which weren't listed, as per
3550:
3508:
3385:
3308:
3290:
3124:
3077:
3040:
2923:
2866:
2799:
2563:
2477:
2416:
2254:
2204:
2109:
2059:
2024:
1985:
1948:
1902:
1845:
1814:
1795:
1763:
1719:
1665:
1620:
1582:
1554:
1538:
1446:
1431:
1407:
1363:
1344:
1323:
1290:
1243:
1228:
1204:
1167:
1101:
1060:
1037:
1008:
953:
920:
822:
788:
741:
632:
565:
521:
393:
378:
342:
303:
190:
3546:
1758:
I didn't think there was really anything worth merging, to be honest. The policy is
4029:
3834:
3777:
3504:
3436:
3421:
3384:
and thanks for reviewing. I'll reply to your comments and suggestions later today.
3357:
2760:
2543:
2501:
2458:
2380:
2349:
2238:
1943:
1701:
1646:
1351:
417:
3890:
3852:
Hi Tiller54, I offer my sincere congratulations on the work that you did to bring
3692:
3239:
2412:
2172:
Template:Did you know nominations/Washington, D.C. Attorney General election, 2014
2086:
Template:Did you know nominations/Washington, D.C. Attorney General election, 2014
541:
at 5% is correct. I can't find her with 5% in that date range anywhere. Thanks.
2893:
1781:
1744:
1203:
which potential and possible candidates they include and don't include. Thanks!
967:
939:
905:
588:
477:
3771:
3109:
2586:
1739:
673:
2728:
Template:Did you know nominations/Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016
1242:
Hahaha! No, I hadn't seen that! That's brilliant! "invalid category" indeed.
3464:
2851:
2717:
2540:
Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016
2498:
Nationwide opinion polling for the United States presidential election, 2016
1939:
874:
3034:
Hello. I was always taught that the opening sentence of an article about a
1700:
Thanks for adding polling data to the 2014 U.S. Senate elections articles.
3336:
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article
2590:
other 14 seats, should be covered in a single article. What do you think?
2080:
I've nominated this article you created to appear on the main page in the
1196:
3927:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
3729:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
2953:
has been a useful resource for your work. TWL is expanding rapidly and
2890:
have now contended that there is a "Critical fault in proposal evidence"
2779:
what facet of citation etiquette would dictate this. Thanks in advance.
2379:
The problem is that there exists on Knowledge (XXG) a powerful lobby of
2228:
3759:
BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected
3155:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
2848:
has the sequence at the bottom of the page instead of in the infobox.
46:
4102:
4037:
3978:
3949:
3878:
3842:
3824:
3804:
3793:
3774:. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :)
3751:
3677:
3617:
3597:
3558:
3532:
3516:
3497:
3476:
3453:
3393:
3374:
3350:
3316:
3298:
3271:
3228:
3188:
3132:
3117:
3082:
3048:
3024:
2931:
2907:
2874:
2859:
2827:
2807:
2788:
2765:
2670:
2603:
2571:
2553:
2511:
2485:
2466:
2443:
2424:
2405:
2354:
2317:
Template:Did you know nominations/Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
2262:
2246:
2218:
2117:
2098:
2067:
2052:
2032:
2017:
1993:
1979:
1956:
1931:
1910:
1894:
1871:
1853:
1834:
1803:
1789:
1771:
1752:
1727:
1709:
1673:
1628:
1613:
1590:
1562:
1547:
1517:
1454:
1439:
1415:
1392:
1371:
1331:
1317:
1298:
1282:
1251:
1236:
1212:
1175:
1160:
1137:
1109:
1094:
1068:
1054:
1045:
1027:
1016:
1001:
975:
961:
947:
928:
913:
894:
857:
830:
816:
796:
775:
749:
734:
708:
681:
655:
640:
624:
573:
553:
529:
514:
492:
470:
429:
401:
386:
350:
331:
311:
296:
276:
64:
4081:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Charles Lollar (2nd nomination)
2708:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was
2301:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was
2156:, which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was
1264:"Any need to mention names of sources in brackets during a sentence?"
1535:
3463:
During the 2014 U.S. senatorial elections, you took an interest in
3108:. Please do not erase articles without consensus on the talk page.
3811:
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the
448:
Talk:New York's 26th congressional district special election, 2011
3251:. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been
3208:
a discussion, on the article talk page on English Knowledge (XXG)
502:
Hey there. Could you please weigh in here, and see if you agree:
1840:
The reference was to IMDB, which isn't a reliable source. Isn't
3961:
I am informing you that the articles on municipal elections in
3930:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
3861:
Talk:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014#Libertarian candidate
3732:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
3572:, are more than enough to show notablity for Sean Haugh as per
2978:: share updates in blogs, social media, newsletters and notices
2633:
dedicated to improving articles related to American politician
919:
Apologies, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for letting me know.
867:
Hi, I see you've run into this user's additions. I've opened a
845:
Hey Tiller! Long time no talk! Could you please weigh in here:
3244:
2679:
2303:... that because no candidate won a majority of the vote, the
2272:
2127:
408:
Republican Party (United States) presidential primaries, 2012
54:. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
4068:, is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
3803:
3649:
It is hoped that AfC reviewers will apply for this right at
2990:: connect to university libraries, archives, and other GLAMs
2941:
2227:
1619:
Ah, thanks. Wasn't aware it was such a controversial topic!
457:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
439:
1187:
nowhere then back to 1st from 4 different polls. Thank You
1182:
Reply (Statewide Polling for the Republican 2016 Primary's)
559:
5% is the figure Gallup originally gave. If you go back to
4005:
is suitable for inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) according to
1402:
and it's how the numbers are reported on other sites like
952:
OK, I'll remember to do that in the future. Thanks again!
3074:, and I look forward to a helpful and robust discussion.
3800:
Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.
3281:
I have been watching this page which looks more like an
2984:: advise on building tools to support the library's work
2124:
DYK for Washington, D.C. Attorney General election, 2014
1262:
Hi, Tiller54. You asked in your Treblinka edit summary:
670:
Talk:United States Senate election in North Dakota, 2012
4058:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
3999:
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article
3911:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
3820:. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
3713:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
3247:, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
1534:
You've been doing a good job. Come and check this out
1427:
1224:
1148:
994:
720:
560:
503:
361:
Hello. Was wondering what your source was for changing
3653:
and lend a hand. You'll need to have read the page at
3859:
I would ask, however, that you continue to engage at
2641:. If you are interested in joining, please visit the
2585:
Dallas is the rare large city in the U.S. that has a
3633:
Since July there has been a very serious backlog at
3060:
List of current members of the British Privy Council
2726:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2315:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
2170:
The nomination discussion and review may be seen at
989:
United States Senate election in Massachusetts, 2012
4017:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Vernon Parker
2883:
Talk:Hillary Rodham Clinton/April 2015 move request
2676:
DYK for Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016
1844:more about deleting redirects than merging things?
2840:Oh whoops didn't even see the sequence was in the
3218:I would very‐much appreciate your participation !
3147:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
3058:Hi Tiller54. Since you've edited one or more of
2152:Washington, D.C. Attorney General election, 2014
2075:Washington, D.C. Attorney General election, 2014
435:Re. polling table in reverse chronological order
3772:BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon
3865:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
3813:Knowledge (XXG):Dispute resolution noticeboard
1917:United States Senate Election in Arizona, 2016
1645:
416:for discussion about the possible addition of
341:about Petraeus running for President, though.
3259:if you'd like to experiment with test edits.
162:
77:
24:
8:
3957:Peoria election articles deletion nomination
2713:Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign
2269:DYK for Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
1762:, which he fails as an unelected candidate.
1579:Talk:California gubernatorial election, 2014
369:says 90, but they're known to be one short.
2704:Hillary Clinton presidential campaign, 2016
446:Hello, Tiller54. You have new messages at
3123:Whoops, didn't see that on the talk page.
1398:Yes it is. It's what Clarity did in their
4070:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
4007:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
3818:Talk:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
3427:Talk:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
2700:was updated with a fact from the article
2293:was updated with a fact from the article
2148:was updated with a fact from the article
1362:Sure, I'll add some references tomorrow.
1122:United States presidential election, 2016
586:
3872:Mississippi gubernatorial election, 1999
3098:Mississippi gubernatorial election, 2015
2542:always up-to-date. Much appreciated! -
2472:Actually, the precedent, as established
261:conservative support for President Obama
1738:Hello, Tiller54. You recently changed
1571:California gubernatorial election, 2014
615:Hey dude; why the removal of the date?
2966:: help distribute free research access
2938:The Knowledge (XXG) Library needs you!
2720:from New York to Iowa in a customized
2496:Thank you for your efforts in keeping
1664:20:49, 4 August 2014 (UTC) Haha, yep!
1489:Your efforts haven't gone unnoticed :)
203:- a Wizard to help you create articles
3870:In the meantime, I ask you to ponder
2452:Missouri gubernatorial election, 2016
1860:List of Gavin & Stacey characters
7:
3967:have all been nominated for deletion
3900:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
3854:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
3702:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
3413:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
3406:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
3338:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
3331:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
2297:Vermont gubernatorial election, 2014
1968:United States Senate elections, 2016
536:Gallup poll with or without Bachmann
365:'s Derby appearances from 91 to 92?
3913:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
3715:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
2846:Philadelphia mayoral election, 2011
2842:Philadelphia mayoral election, 2015
2836:Philadelphia mayoral election, 2015
2645:, and add your name to the list of
2306:2014 Vermont gubernatorial election
1577:removed. Please see my comments at
1128:would be helpful and appreciated.--
1120:As a major contributor the article
96:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
4079:The discussion will take place at
3884:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
3666:(Sent to all active AfC reviewers)
3092:I noticed you redirected the page
3054:Honorifics in lists of politicians
3030:Opening sentence, re Darryl Powell
2972:: seek new donations from partners
2609:WikiProject Hillary Rodham Clinton
1482:Thanks for updating/improving the
714:Maryland 2012 Senate Race Websites
282:Tommy Smith (footballer born 1980)
106:Intuitive guide to Knowledge (XXG)
14:
4015:The article will be discussed at
3173:review the candidates' statements
3094:Robert Gray (American politician)
2794:A self-published source is not a
2043:Belated thanks for the barnstar!
265:Talk:Public image of Barack Obama
4051:
3993:
3889:
3691:
3420:
3349:
3238:
2683:
2616:
2524:
2276:
2131:
1686:
1468:
587:
564:assume it's because of rounding.
45:
3934:and submit your choices on the
3897:Hello, Tiller54. Voting in the
3699:Hello, Tiller54. Voting in the
3623:New Page Review needs your help
2165:first Attorney General election
1600:Why people make a simple thing
1422:Illinois Gubernatorial Election
220:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
3179:. For the Election committee,
3149:Arbitration Committee election
3140:ArbCom elections are now open!
3083:21:06, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
3068:Official Opposition frontbench
2881:New question raised regarding
2578:2015 Dallas municipal election
1790:02:36, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
1772:21:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
1753:22:19, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
1728:21:27, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
1710:19:52, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
1674:22:42, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
1553:Hi, thanks. I'll take a look.
976:00:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
962:23:12, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
948:23:03, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
929:22:54, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
914:22:36, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
895:10:21, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
1:
4038:18:27, 7 September 2021 (UTC)
3979:19:27, 20 December 2020 (UTC)
3879:14:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
3843:20:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
3825:16:32, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
3752:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
3678:16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)
3454:17:02, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
3394:11:53, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
3375:00:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
3317:22:28, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
3299:22:25, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
3229:23:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
3189:14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
3064:British Government frontbench
2467:19:06, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
2219:00:27, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
2118:21:40, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
2099:03:42, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
1528:American politics arbitration
1416:10:22, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
1393:04:34, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
1372:02:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
1332:13:54, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
1318:21:35, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
1299:19:34, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
1283:18:13, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
1213:17:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
1197:14:40, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
1138:05:21, 15 December 2012 (UTC)
709:22:22, 28 February 2012 (UTC)
682:03:11, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
530:15:31, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
515:18:53, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
430:01:11, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
73:
65:11:49, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
20:
3950:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
3794:00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
3618:16:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
3598:01:25, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
3559:13:41, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
3272:00:36, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
3133:18:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
3118:00:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
2538:For your efforts in keeping
2444:03:43, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
2425:19:19, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
2406:13:08, 25 January 2015 (UTC)
2263:20:03, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
2247:18:07, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
2068:00:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
2053:18:11, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
2033:00:06, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
2018:06:04, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
1994:13:46, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
1980:07:32, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
1957:12:56, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
1932:00:36, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
1911:15:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
1895:14:08, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
1872:17:34, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
1854:15:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
1835:09:50, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
1110:23:52, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
1095:16:30, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
841:Intrade in election articles
656:15:39, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
641:15:20, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
625:15:13, 25 January 2012 (UTC)
574:11:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
42:sign your name on talk pages
3736:and submit your choices on
3533:21:50, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
3517:21:39, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
3498:21:29, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
3433:to appear in Did you know.
3175:and submit your choices on
3013:The Knowledge (XXG) Library
2976:Communications coordinators
2951:The Knowledge (XXG) Library
2888:Some opposers of this move
2771:Deleting Declared Candidate
2626:WikiProject Hillary Clinton
2355:12:27, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
1804:17:21, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
1176:17:04, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
1161:16:59, 5 January 2013 (UTC)
1069:19:17, 5 October 2012 (UTC)
1055:21:19, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
1046:18:38, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
1028:18:36, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
1017:16:02, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
1002:00:14, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
554:16:53, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
402:14:00, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
387:12:57, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
196:New contributors' help page
34:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)!
4118:
3942:MediaWiki message delivery
3786:MediaWiki message delivery
3744:MediaWiki message delivery
3734:the candidates' statements
3670:MediaWiki message delivery
3181:MediaWiki message delivery
3017:MediaWiki message delivery
2828:01:08, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
2808:21:39, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
2789:21:33, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
2766:21:18, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
2671:14:57, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
2604:02:39, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
2572:18:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
2554:00:56, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
2512:00:54, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
2235:I removed a legal threat.
1644:I see what you did ... --
1518:23:22, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
1455:20:17, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
1440:18:20, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
1252:19:23, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
1237:19:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)
750:21:13, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
735:20:22, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
498:Hawaii 2012 Senate Primary
277:22:46, 24 April 2010 (UTC)
176:Frequently asked questions
4103:01:01, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
4066:significantly contributed
3477:21:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)
3344:-status according to the
3255:. Please make use of the
3104:. The debate can be seen
3049:19:11, 31 July 2015 (UTC)
2746:, and it may be added to
2532:The Barnstar of Diligence
2523:
2486:19:33, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
2335:, and it may be added to
2190:, and it may be added to
1685:
1629:13:59, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
1614:13:49, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
1467:
593:
493:21:30, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
351:16:44, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
337:Both of the articles are
332:20:48, 27 July 2010 (UTC)
312:19:48, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
297:19:01, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
231:Knowledge (XXG) etiquette
147:How to develop an article
4009:or whether it should be
3512:
3389:
3128:
3025:04:31, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
2996:: run reference services
2932:20:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
2927:
2875:20:21, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
2870:
2803:
2623:You are invited to join
2567:
2481:
2420:
2311:Vermont General Assembly
2258:
2113:
2063:
2028:
1989:
1952:
1906:
1849:
1799:
1767:
1723:
1669:
1624:
1591:16:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
1563:16:33, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
1558:
1548:20:45, 11 May 2014 (UTC)
1450:
1411:
1367:
1327:
1294:
1247:
1208:
1171:
1124:, your participation in
1105:
1064:
1041:
1012:
957:
924:
858:21:32, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
826:
792:
745:
636:
569:
525:
471:06:27, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
397:
346:
307:
2908:04:36, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
2860:20:18, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
2309:will be decided by the
1227:is just plain funny! –
1223:In case you missed it,
995:That edit you just made
831:19:17, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
821:lol no problem. Cheers
817:19:00, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
797:18:47, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
776:18:21, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
186:Where to ask a question
115:Finding your way around
4089:the configuration page
3808:
2982:Technical coordinators
2946:
2752:Did you know talk page
2341:Did you know talk page
2232:
2196:Did you know talk page
444:
3909:Arbitration Committee
3807:
3711:Arbitration Committee
3684:ArbCom Elections 2016
3435:Message delivered by
3356:Message delivered by
3153:Arbitration Committee
2994:Research coordinators
2988:Outreach coordinators
2945:
2231:
1694:The Original Barnstar
1476:The Writer's Barnstar
761:... Waffle over haha
691:Greetings, Tiller54!
597:The Original Barnstar
443:
30:Hello, Tiller54, and
4064:, to which you have
3635:Special:NewPagesFeed
2970:Partner coordinators
2964:Account coordinators
2820:TheDefendingChampion
2781:TheDefendingChampion
2392:another AfD notice.
1604:, I don't know ;) --
1116:Request for comments
1100:No problem! Cheers.
129:Department directory
4072:or if it should be
3768:Thursday 8 December
3541:Re-elect vs reelect
3521:Okay, fair enough.
3415:you nominated as a
3157:arbitration process
2748:the statistics page
2517:A barnstar for you!
2337:the statistics page
2192:the statistics page
1734:Chad Grimm redirect
1679:A barnstar for you!
1635:Good Will Hunting 2
1461:A barnstar for you!
40:Please remember to
3925:arbitration policy
3809:
3727:arbitration policy
3686:: Voting now open!
3643:New Page Reviewing
3545:Just so you know,
3340:you nominated for
3212:how we present MOE
3169:arbitration policy
3011:Send on behalf of
2955:we need your help!
2947:
2360:Spurs 3-4 Man City
2233:
1880:2014 Mass Gov Race
1718:Thanks very much!
756:Lauren Socha edits
687:Hilda Solis update
455:remove this notice
445:
357:Peschisolido stats
101:How to edit a page
52:edit summary field
3796:
3668:
3443:
3364:
2758:
2757:
2745:
2722:Chevrolet Express
2653:
2652:
2559:
2558:
2347:
2346:
2334:
2224:A kitten for you!
2202:
2201:
2189:
1715:
1714:
1524:
1523:
1404:HuffPost Pollster
893:
608:
607:
422:William S. Saturn
363:Paul Peschisolido
252:
251:
248:
247:
244:
243:
159:
158:
124:Table of contents
72:
71:
4109:
4055:
4054:
3997:
3996:
3963:Peoria, Illinois
3893:
3848:Congratulations!
3775:
3695:
3664:
3659:the new tutorial
3482:Mourinho on Balo
3434:
3424:
3355:
3353:
3242:
3206:) has initiated
3006:
2900:
2775:Hello Tiller54-
2731:
2687:
2680:
2666:
2659:
2658:Another Believer
2620:
2613:
2612:
2601:
2599:Let's discuss it
2582:Hello Tiller54,
2551:
2546:
2528:
2521:
2520:
2509:
2504:
2404:
2402:
2320:
2280:
2273:
2175:
2160:Washington, D.C.
2140:18 November 2014
2135:
2128:
2108:. Thanks again!
2058:You're welcome.
1690:
1683:
1682:
1663:
1661:
1655:
1649:
1641:
1515:
1506:
1499:
1472:
1465:
1464:
1378:Clarity Campaign
1315:
1280:
1268:Treblinka Trials
1181:
890:
884:
877:
872:
814:
809:
806:
773:
768:
765:
611:Patrick Hastings
591:
584:
583:
561:my original edit
458:
225:Community Portal
211:How you can help
163:
138:Editing articles
78:
74:
49:
25:
21:
4117:
4116:
4112:
4111:
4110:
4108:
4107:
4106:
4091:. Delivered by
4056:
4052:
4049:
4026:
3998:
3994:
3990:
3959:
3954:
3953:
3894:
3886:
3876:User:HopsonRoad
3856:to GA status.
3850:
3822:User:HopsonRoad
3802:
3761:
3756:
3755:
3739:the voting page
3696:
3688:
3625:
3605:
3566:
3543:
3484:
3461:
3439:, on behalf of
3409:
3360:, on behalf of
3334:
3279:
3236:
3196:
3177:the voting page
3143:
3090:
3056:
3032:
3008:
3004:
2940:
2915:
2913:Brenda Lawrence
2894:
2886:
2838:
2796:reliable source
2773:
2678:
2669:
2664:
2657:
2635:Hillary Clinton
2611:
2597:
2580:
2549:
2544:
2519:
2507:
2502:
2494:
2454:
2398:
2396:
2362:
2271:
2226:
2126:
2078:
2041:
2006:
2004:Please consider
1972:Makeitobjective
1964:Arizona section
1924:Makeitobjective
1919:
1887:TreebeardTheEnt
1882:
1818:
1736:
1681:
1659:
1653:
1647:
1639:
1637:
1598:
1574:
1569:Recent edit at
1532:
1509:
1500:
1493:
1484:Juliette Barnes
1463:
1424:
1385:Criticalthinker
1380:
1348:
1313:
1278:
1260:
1221:
1184:
1145:
1126:this discussion
1118:
1083:
1081:restore deleted
992:
966:No, thank you.
902:
888:
882:
875:
865:
843:
812:
807:
804:
771:
766:
763:
758:
716:
689:
666:
613:
582:
552:
538:
500:
481:
459:
452:
437:
412:Please comment
410:
359:
320:
284:
257:
255:Opinion needed!
212:
168:
152:Manual of Style
139:
116:
83:
82:Getting started
68:
57:Happy editing!
19:
12:
11:
5:
4115:
4113:
4061:Charles Lollar
4050:
4048:
4045:Charles Lollar
4043:Nomination of
4041:
3992:
3991:
3989:
3984:Nomination of
3982:
3958:
3955:
3932:the candidates
3895:
3888:
3887:
3885:
3882:
3849:
3846:
3801:
3798:
3760:
3757:
3697:
3690:
3689:
3687:
3681:
3624:
3621:
3604:
3601:
3565:
3562:
3542:
3539:
3538:
3537:
3536:
3535:
3483:
3480:
3460:
3457:
3408:
3404:nomination of
3398:
3397:
3396:
3333:
3329:nomination of
3323:
3322:
3321:
3320:
3319:
3278:
3275:
3264:Morbidthoughts
3235:
3232:
3221:Info por favor
3195:
3192:
3146:
3142:
3137:
3136:
3135:
3089:
3086:
3055:
3052:
3031:
3028:
3010:
3002:
3000:
2998:
2997:
2991:
2985:
2979:
2973:
2967:
2939:
2936:
2935:
2934:
2914:
2911:
2885:
2879:
2878:
2877:
2837:
2834:
2833:
2832:
2831:
2830:
2772:
2769:
2756:
2755:
2688:
2677:
2674:
2661:
2651:
2650:
2621:
2610:
2607:
2579:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2557:
2556:
2535:
2534:
2529:
2518:
2515:
2493:
2490:
2489:
2488:
2453:
2450:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2446:
2428:
2427:
2385:WP:SPORTSEVENT
2367:User:Stevo1000
2361:
2358:
2345:
2344:
2285:4 January 2015
2281:
2270:
2267:
2266:
2265:
2249:
2225:
2222:
2200:
2199:
2136:
2125:
2122:
2121:
2120:
2077:
2072:
2071:
2070:
2040:
2037:
2036:
2035:
2005:
2002:
2001:
2000:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1918:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1881:
1878:
1877:
1876:
1875:
1874:
1864:Martinevans123
1827:Martinevans123
1817:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1775:
1774:
1735:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1713:
1712:
1697:
1696:
1691:
1680:
1677:
1636:
1633:
1632:
1631:
1602:so complicated
1597:
1594:
1573:
1567:
1566:
1565:
1531:
1525:
1522:
1521:
1490:
1487:
1479:
1478:
1473:
1462:
1459:
1458:
1457:
1423:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1379:
1376:
1375:
1374:
1347:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1259:
1256:
1255:
1254:
1220:
1217:
1216:
1215:
1183:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1144:
1141:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1087:Green Cardamom
1082:
1079:
1078:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1071:
1031:
1030:
1020:
1019:
991:
986:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
901:
898:
864:
861:
842:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:
834:
833:
784:WP:NOTCENSORED
757:
754:
753:
752:
715:
712:
688:
685:
665:
664:election polls
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
612:
609:
606:
605:
600:
599:
594:
592:
581:
578:
577:
576:
548:
537:
534:
533:
532:
499:
496:
480:
474:
451:
438:
436:
433:
420:to the page.--
409:
406:
405:
404:
358:
355:
354:
353:
319:
316:
315:
314:
283:
280:
256:
253:
250:
249:
246:
245:
242:
241:
240:
239:
233:
227:
222:
214:
213:
210:
207:
206:
205:
204:
201:Article Wizard
198:
193:
188:
183:
178:
170:
169:
166:
160:
157:
156:
155:
154:
149:
141:
140:
137:
134:
133:
132:
131:
126:
118:
117:
114:
111:
110:
109:
108:
103:
98:
93:
85:
84:
81:
70:
69:
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
4114:
4105:
4104:
4100:
4096:
4095:
4090:
4085:
4084:the article.
4082:
4077:
4075:
4071:
4067:
4063:
4062:
4046:
4042:
4040:
4039:
4035:
4031:
4025:
4021:
4018:
4012:
4008:
4004:
4003:
4002:Vernon Parker
3987:
3986:Vernon Parker
3983:
3981:
3980:
3976:
3972:
3971:SecretName101
3968:
3964:
3956:
3952:
3951:
3947:
3943:
3939:
3938:
3933:
3928:
3926:
3922:
3918:
3914:
3910:
3905:
3902:
3901:
3892:
3883:
3881:
3880:
3877:
3873:
3868:
3866:
3862:
3857:
3855:
3847:
3845:
3844:
3840:
3836:
3832:
3827:
3826:
3823:
3819:
3814:
3806:
3799:
3797:
3795:
3791:
3787:
3783:
3779:
3773:
3769:
3765:
3764:AfC Reviewers
3758:
3754:
3753:
3749:
3745:
3741:
3740:
3735:
3730:
3728:
3724:
3720:
3716:
3712:
3707:
3704:
3703:
3694:
3685:
3682:
3680:
3679:
3675:
3671:
3667:
3662:
3660:
3656:
3652:
3647:
3644:
3639:
3636:
3631:
3628:
3627:Hi Tiller54,
3622:
3620:
3619:
3615:
3611:
3602:
3600:
3599:
3595:
3591:
3587:
3583:
3579:
3575:
3571:
3563:
3561:
3560:
3556:
3552:
3548:
3540:
3534:
3531:
3530:
3529:
3526:
3520:
3519:
3518:
3514:
3510:
3506:
3502:
3501:
3500:
3499:
3496:
3495:
3494:
3491:
3481:
3479:
3478:
3474:
3470:
3466:
3458:
3456:
3455:
3451:
3447:
3446:Hurricanehink
3442:
3441:Hurricanehink
3438:
3432:
3428:
3423:
3418:
3414:
3407:
3403:
3399:
3395:
3391:
3387:
3383:
3382:Hurricanehink
3379:
3378:
3377:
3376:
3372:
3368:
3367:Hurricanehink
3363:
3362:Hurricanehink
3359:
3352:
3347:
3343:
3339:
3332:
3328:
3324:
3318:
3314:
3310:
3305:
3304:
3303:
3302:
3301:
3300:
3296:
3292:
3288:
3284:
3276:
3274:
3273:
3269:
3265:
3262:
3258:
3254:
3250:
3246:
3241:
3233:
3231:
3230:
3226:
3222:
3219:
3215:
3213:
3209:
3205:
3201:
3193:
3191:
3190:
3186:
3182:
3178:
3174:
3170:
3166:
3162:
3158:
3154:
3150:
3141:
3138:
3134:
3130:
3126:
3122:
3121:
3120:
3119:
3115:
3111:
3107:
3103:
3099:
3095:
3087:
3085:
3084:
3081:
3080:
3079:
3073:
3069:
3065:
3061:
3053:
3051:
3050:
3046:
3042:
3037:
3029:
3027:
3026:
3022:
3018:
3014:
3007:
3001:
2995:
2992:
2989:
2986:
2983:
2980:
2977:
2974:
2971:
2968:
2965:
2962:
2961:
2960:
2957:
2956:
2952:
2944:
2937:
2933:
2929:
2925:
2921:
2920:
2919:
2912:
2910:
2909:
2906:
2905:
2901:
2899:
2898:
2891:
2884:
2880:
2876:
2872:
2868:
2864:
2863:
2862:
2861:
2857:
2853:
2849:
2847:
2843:
2835:
2829:
2825:
2821:
2816:
2811:
2810:
2809:
2805:
2801:
2797:
2793:
2792:
2791:
2790:
2786:
2782:
2776:
2770:
2768:
2767:
2764:
2763:
2753:
2749:
2743:
2739:
2735:
2729:
2725:
2723:
2719:
2716:began with a
2715:
2714:
2707:
2706:
2705:
2699:
2698:
2693:
2692:21 April 2015
2689:
2686:
2682:
2681:
2675:
2673:
2672:
2667:
2660:
2648:
2644:
2640:
2636:
2632:
2628:
2627:
2622:
2619:
2615:
2614:
2608:
2606:
2605:
2602:
2600:
2595:
2594:
2588:
2583:
2577:
2573:
2569:
2565:
2561:
2560:
2555:
2552:
2547:
2541:
2537:
2536:
2533:
2530:
2527:
2522:
2516:
2514:
2513:
2510:
2505:
2499:
2491:
2487:
2483:
2479:
2475:
2471:
2470:
2469:
2468:
2464:
2460:
2451:
2445:
2441:
2437:
2432:
2431:
2430:
2429:
2426:
2422:
2418:
2414:
2410:
2409:
2408:
2407:
2403:
2401:
2393:
2389:
2386:
2382:
2377:
2375:
2372:
2368:
2359:
2357:
2356:
2353:
2352:
2342:
2338:
2332:
2328:
2324:
2318:
2314:
2312:
2308:
2307:
2300:
2299:
2298:
2292:
2291:
2286:
2282:
2279:
2275:
2274:
2268:
2264:
2260:
2256:
2252:
2251:
2250:
2248:
2244:
2240:
2236:
2230:
2223:
2221:
2220:
2216:
2213:
2210:
2206:
2197:
2193:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2173:
2169:
2167:
2166:
2161:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2147:
2146:
2141:
2137:
2134:
2130:
2129:
2123:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2106:this election
2103:
2102:
2101:
2100:
2097:
2096:
2091:
2087:
2084:section, see
2083:
2082:Did you know?
2076:
2073:
2069:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2050:
2046:
2038:
2034:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2021:
2020:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2003:
1995:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1977:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1960:
1959:
1958:
1954:
1950:
1945:
1941:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1933:
1929:
1925:
1916:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1899:
1898:
1897:
1896:
1892:
1888:
1879:
1873:
1869:
1865:
1861:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1843:
1839:
1838:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1816:
1815:Nessa Jenkins
1813:
1805:
1801:
1797:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1778:
1777:
1776:
1773:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1760:WP:POLITICIAN
1757:
1756:
1755:
1754:
1750:
1746:
1741:
1733:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1711:
1707:
1703:
1699:
1698:
1695:
1692:
1689:
1684:
1678:
1676:
1675:
1671:
1667:
1662:
1660:contributions
1656:
1650:
1642:
1634:
1630:
1626:
1622:
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1611:
1607:
1603:
1595:
1593:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1556:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1546:
1543:
1540:
1536:
1529:
1526:
1520:
1519:
1516:
1514:
1513:
1512:→Talk to me!→
1507:
1505:
1504:
1498:
1497:
1485:
1481:
1480:
1477:
1474:
1471:
1466:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1444:
1443:
1442:
1441:
1437:
1433:
1429:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1401:
1400:press release
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1357:
1353:
1346:
1345:Godfrey Bloom
1343:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1311:
1310:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1301:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1281:
1276:
1275:
1269:
1265:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1240:
1239:
1238:
1234:
1230:
1226:
1218:
1214:
1210:
1206:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1194:
1190:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1164:
1163:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1142:
1140:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1115:
1111:
1107:
1103:
1099:
1098:
1097:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1080:
1070:
1066:
1062:
1058:
1057:
1056:
1053:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1043:
1039:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1022:
1021:
1018:
1014:
1010:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1000:
996:
990:
987:
977:
973:
969:
965:
964:
963:
959:
955:
951:
950:
949:
945:
941:
937:
932:
931:
930:
926:
922:
918:
917:
916:
915:
911:
907:
899:
897:
896:
892:
891:
885:
879:
878:
870:
869:thread at ANI
863:User:Juragraf
862:
860:
859:
855:
851:
847:
840:
832:
828:
824:
820:
819:
818:
815:
810:
800:
799:
798:
794:
790:
785:
780:
779:
778:
777:
774:
769:
755:
751:
747:
743:
739:
738:
737:
736:
732:
728:
724:
721:
713:
711:
710:
706:
702:
696:
692:
686:
684:
683:
679:
675:
671:
663:
657:
653:
649:
644:
643:
642:
638:
634:
629:
628:
627:
626:
622:
618:
610:
602:
601:
598:
595:
590:
585:
579:
575:
571:
567:
562:
558:
557:
556:
555:
551:
547:
546:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
516:
512:
508:
504:
497:
495:
494:
490:
486:
483:No I don't.--
479:
475:
473:
472:
468:
464:
456:
449:
442:
434:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
415:
407:
403:
399:
395:
391:
390:
389:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:says 91, and
372:
368:
364:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
336:
335:
334:
333:
329:
325:
318:2012 election
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:
299:
298:
294:
290:
281:
279:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
254:
238:
234:
232:
228:
226:
223:
221:
218:
217:
216:
215:
209:
208:
202:
199:
197:
194:
192:
189:
187:
184:
182:
179:
177:
174:
173:
172:
171:
165:
164:
161:
153:
150:
148:
145:
144:
143:
142:
136:
135:
130:
127:
125:
122:
121:
120:
119:
113:
112:
107:
104:
102:
99:
97:
94:
92:
89:
88:
87:
86:
80:
79:
76:
75:
67:
66:
63:
60:
55:
53:
48:
43:
38:
37:
36:
35:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
4092:
4086:
4078:
4059:
4057:
4047:for deletion
4027:
4022:
4014:
4000:
3988:for deletion
3960:
3935:
3929:
3906:
3898:
3896:
3869:
3858:
3851:
3830:
3828:
3810:
3778:user:Kudpung
3767:
3763:
3762:
3737:
3731:
3708:
3700:
3698:
3665:
3663:
3648:
3640:
3632:
3629:
3626:
3606:
3567:
3544:
3527:
3524:
3522:
3505:MOS:ELLIPSIS
3492:
3489:
3487:
3485:
3462:
3417:good article
3411:The article
3410:
3335:
3280:
3277:Monica Wehby
3260:
3249:edit summary
3237:
3234:January 2016
3217:
3216:
3211:
3197:
3144:
3101:
3091:
3076:
3075:
3057:
3035:
3033:
3009:
2999:
2993:
2987:
2981:
2975:
2969:
2963:
2958:
2954:
2948:
2916:
2903:
2896:
2895:
2887:
2850:
2839:
2777:
2774:
2761:
2759:
2742:daily totals
2711:
2709:
2702:
2701:
2697:Did you know
2695:
2654:
2647:participants
2643:project page
2624:
2598:
2592:
2584:
2581:
2531:
2495:
2455:
2399:
2394:
2390:
2381:Deletionists
2378:
2363:
2350:
2348:
2331:daily totals
2304:
2302:
2295:
2294:
2290:Did you know
2288:
2237:
2234:
2211:
2203:
2186:daily totals
2163:
2157:
2150:
2149:
2145:Did you know
2143:
2094:
2090:the criteria
2079:
2042:
2007:
1944:SodaHead.com
1920:
1883:
1819:
1737:
1693:
1643:
1638:
1606:Gerda Arendt
1599:
1575:
1533:
1527:
1511:
1510:
1502:
1501:
1495:
1494:
1488:
1475:
1425:
1381:
1349:
1308:
1273:
1263:
1261:
1222:
1185:
1166:No problem!
1146:
1143:Thank you...
1119:
1084:
1052:GoldRingChip
1025:GoldRingChip
999:GoldRingChip
993:
903:
880:
873:
871:about them.
866:
844:
787:it. Cheers.
759:
717:
697:
693:
690:
667:
614:
596:
542:
539:
501:
482:
461:--Regards--
460:
418:Phil Davison
411:
375:Derby County
360:
339:specifically
338:
321:
302:No problem!
285:
260:
258:
167:Getting help
91:Introduction
56:
44:by clicking
39:
32:
31:
29:
3937:voting page
3431:nominate it
3419:has passed
3283:attack page
3088:Robert Gray
3005:Sign up now
2815:Self-Source
2631:WikiProject
2562:Thank you!
2253:Thank you!
2010:Leprof 7272
1491:Regards, -
1153:Xenophrenic
485:CumbrianRam
478:Ben Pringle
267:. Thanks.--
3921:topic bans
3816:the topic
3723:topic bans
3590:Acidskater
3564:Sean Haugh
3469:Ammodramus
3165:topic bans
2738:live views
2734:here's how
2587:Weak mayor
2327:live views
2323:here's how
2182:live views
2178:here's how
2168:this year?
1740:Chad Grimm
1486:article :)
1406:. Thanks,
1309:Poeticbent
1274:Poeticbent
1189:Guyb123321
701:Damotclese
672:about it.
371:Neil Brown
367:Soccerbase
324:Jerzeykydd
269:Jerzeykydd
191:Help pages
181:Cheatsheet
4094:SDZeroBot
3917:site bans
3833:anymore.
3831:reverting
3719:site bans
3641:Although
3570:WP:NEXIST
3465:Ben Sasse
3459:Ben Sasse
3200:All4peace
3161:site bans
2718:road trip
2710:... that
2492:Date sort
2436:Stevo1000
2400:Falastur2
2205:Cas Liber
2162:held its
2158:... that
2045:JamKaftan
1940:MOS:LISTS
1428:this edit
1258:Treblinka
1225:this edit
1130:JayJasper
936:WP:VANDAL
850:America69
727:America69
722:and here
648:Ironholds
617:Ironholds
545:Torchiest
507:America69
463:KeptSouth
235:Practice
3610:Activist
3551:Scjessey
3525:Vaseline
3509:Tiller54
3490:Vaseline
3386:Tiller54
3346:criteria
3309:CNMall41
3291:CNMall41
3287:WP:UNDUE
3253:reverted
3125:Tiller54
3041:Struway2
2949:We hope
2924:Tiller54
2867:Tiller54
2800:Tiller54
2564:Tiller54
2478:Tiller54
2417:Tiller54
2255:Tiller54
2215:contribs
2110:Tiller54
2095:innotata
2060:Tiller54
2039:Barnstar
2025:Tiller54
1986:Tiller54
1949:Tiller54
1903:Tiller54
1846:Tiller54
1796:Tiller54
1764:Tiller54
1720:Tiller54
1666:Tiller54
1621:Tiller54
1583:MelanieN
1555:Tiller54
1539:Smuckola
1530:evidence
1447:Tiller54
1432:Stacecom
1408:Tiller54
1364:Tiller54
1324:Tiller54
1291:Tiller54
1244:Tiller54
1229:Muboshgu
1205:Tiller54
1168:Tiller54
1102:Tiller54
1061:Tiller54
1038:Tiller54
1009:Tiller54
954:Tiller54
921:Tiller54
823:Tiller54
789:Tiller54
742:Tiller54
633:Tiller54
580:Barnstar
566:Tiller54
522:Tiller54
453:You can
394:Tiller54
379:Struway2
343:Tiller54
304:Tiller54
237:civility
17:Welcome!
4074:deleted
4030:Mpen320
4011:deleted
3835:GoodDay
3651:WP:PERM
3603:Apology
3547:reelect
3528:eeeeeee
3493:eeeeeee
3437:Legobot
3358:Legobot
3257:sandbox
2762:Harrias
2545:Cwobeel
2503:Cwobeel
2459:Tdl1060
2351:Harrias
2239:Bearian
1702:Bearian
1654:discuss
1648:chulk90
1596:Sellers
1542:(Email)
1352:Jim1138
1147:...for
229:Follow
62:Snowman
3655:WP:NPR
3586:WP:CON
3582:WP:XFD
3578:WP:BIO
3574:WP:GNG
3425:; see
3210:about
3151:. The
3036:former
3015:using
2897:bd2412
2593:Cullen
2550:(talk)
2508:(talk)
1842:WP:RFD
1823:WP:RFD
1782:Fishal
1745:Fishal
1545:(Talk)
1496:→Davey
968:Drmies
940:Drmies
906:Drmies
3400:Your
3325:Your
3198:User
3110:MB298
1503:2010→
889:edits
805:Davey
764:Davey
719:here:
674:Rxguy
550:edits
59:Giant
4099:talk
4034:talk
3975:talk
3946:talk
3907:The
3839:talk
3790:talk
3780:for
3748:talk
3709:The
3674:talk
3657:and
3614:talk
3594:talk
3584:and
3576:and
3555:talk
3513:talk
3473:talk
3450:talk
3390:talk
3371:talk
3313:talk
3295:talk
3268:talk
3225:talk
3204:talk
3185:talk
3129:talk
3114:talk
3106:here
3102:keep
3072:here
3066:and
3045:talk
3021:talk
2928:talk
2871:talk
2856:talk
2852:chsh
2824:talk
2804:talk
2785:talk
2724:van?
2665:Talk
2639:here
2629:, a
2568:talk
2482:talk
2474:here
2463:talk
2440:talk
2421:talk
2413:here
2371:this
2259:talk
2243:talk
2209:talk
2114:talk
2064:talk
2049:talk
2029:talk
2014:talk
1990:talk
1976:talk
1953:talk
1928:talk
1907:talk
1891:talk
1868:talk
1850:talk
1831:talk
1800:talk
1786:talk
1768:talk
1749:talk
1724:talk
1706:talk
1670:talk
1625:talk
1610:talk
1587:talk
1559:talk
1537:. —
1451:talk
1436:talk
1412:talk
1389:talk
1368:talk
1356:talk
1328:talk
1314:talk
1295:talk
1279:talk
1248:talk
1233:talk
1209:talk
1193:talk
1172:talk
1157:talk
1149:this
1134:talk
1106:talk
1091:talk
1065:talk
1042:talk
1013:talk
972:talk
958:talk
944:talk
925:talk
910:talk
883:talk
876:N-HH
854:talk
827:talk
813:Talk
808:2010
793:talk
772:Talk
767:2010
746:talk
731:talk
705:talk
678:talk
652:talk
637:talk
621:talk
570:talk
526:talk
511:talk
489:talk
476:Re,
467:talk
426:talk
414:here
398:talk
383:talk
347:talk
328:talk
308:talk
293:talk
273:talk
3782:NPR
3661:.
3444:--
3380:Hi
3365:--
3245:JJC
3145:Hi,
3096:to
3078:DBD
2858:)
2690:On
2374:one
2283:On
2138:On
1966:of
1426:Re
1219:Ha!
900:Ιων
289:WFC
263:in
4101:)
4076:.
4036:)
4013:.
3977:)
3965:,
3948:)
3940:.
3919:,
3841:)
3792:)
3784:.
3750:)
3742:.
3721:,
3676:)
3616:)
3596:)
3588:.
3557:)
3515:)
3507:.
3475:)
3452:)
3402:GA
3392:)
3373:)
3348:.
3342:GA
3327:GA
3315:)
3307:--
3297:)
3270:)
3227:)
3214:.
3187:)
3163:,
3131:)
3116:)
3062:,
3047:)
3023:)
2930:)
2873:)
2826:)
2806:)
2787:)
2740:,
2736:,
2694:,
2649:.
2570:)
2484:)
2465:)
2442:)
2423:)
2329:,
2325:,
2287:,
2261:)
2245:)
2217:)
2184:,
2180:,
2142:,
2116:)
2066:)
2051:)
2031:)
2016:)
1992:)
1978:)
1955:)
1930:)
1909:)
1893:)
1870:)
1852:)
1833:)
1802:)
1788:)
1770:)
1751:)
1726:)
1708:)
1672:)
1627:)
1612:)
1589:)
1561:)
1453:)
1438:)
1414:)
1391:)
1383:--
1370:)
1358:)
1330:)
1297:)
1250:)
1235:)
1211:)
1195:)
1174:)
1159:)
1136:)
1108:)
1093:)
1067:)
1044:)
1015:)
974:)
960:)
946:)
927:)
912:)
856:)
829:)
795:)
748:)
733:)
707:)
680:)
654:)
639:)
623:)
572:)
528:)
513:)
491:)
469:)
428:)
400:)
385:)
349:)
330:)
310:)
295:)
275:)
4097:(
4032:(
3973:(
3944:(
3837:(
3788:(
3776:(
3746:(
3672:(
3612:(
3592:(
3553:(
3511:(
3471:(
3448:(
3388:(
3369:(
3311:(
3293:(
3266:(
3223:(
3202:(
3183:(
3127:(
3112:(
3043:(
3019:(
2926:(
2904:T
2869:(
2854:(
2822:(
2802:(
2783:(
2754:.
2744:)
2732:(
2668:)
2662:(
2566:(
2480:(
2461:(
2438:(
2419:(
2343:.
2333:)
2321:(
2313:?
2257:(
2241:(
2212:·
2207:(
2198:.
2188:)
2176:(
2112:(
2062:(
2047:(
2027:(
2012:(
1988:(
1974:(
1951:(
1926:(
1905:(
1889:(
1866:(
1848:(
1829:(
1798:(
1784:(
1766:(
1747:(
1722:(
1704:(
1668:(
1657:/
1651:/
1623:(
1608:(
1585:(
1557:(
1449:(
1434:(
1410:(
1387:(
1366:(
1354:(
1326:(
1293:(
1246:(
1231:(
1207:(
1191:(
1170:(
1155:(
1132:(
1104:(
1089:(
1063:(
1040:(
1011:(
970:(
956:(
942:(
923:(
908:(
886:/
852:(
825:(
791:(
744:(
729:(
703:(
676:(
650:(
635:(
619:(
568:(
543:—
524:(
509:(
487:(
465:(
450:.
424:(
396:(
381:(
345:(
326:(
306:(
291:(
271:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.