233:
138:
As I noted earlier, it is very difficult to determine what you added to this article and what you copied over from the original version. I finally sussed this out by carefully comparing this draft to the version in the
Knowledge (XXG) main space. My assessment will thus be based on the additions you
326:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
149:
Content: The part you added seems to be the first 5 paragraphs of “Historical stereotypes.” This adds what seems to be useful information, but it largely just replicates stuff that is in the article already in a new format that reads almost like something that was written by generative AI. I’m not
42:
First off, let me stay that it's difficult to review your work, since it's unclear what you've done and what you're taking from the previous version of the article. I'll do my best here, responding to the material in your sandbox, and offering suggestions for how you will need to integrate it into
101:
The article is essentially a giant list, which is not the ideal style for a
Knowledge (XXG) article. It's probably too late, but what would make this article A quality would be a more thematic organization -- rather than every single stereotype getting its own paragraph or more, you'd group them
92:
This is a major red flag. Where are your sources? You have paragraph upon paragraph of new information, but you haven't cited any sources at all. This is an essential pillar of
Knowledge (XXG), so for your final version, I would focus on adding those source citations! You should have not even a
273:. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of
155:
Tone and balance: While I agree with your paragraph about “the urgent need” to address these stereotypes, this sort of writing is not what
Knowledge (XXG) does. Knowledge (XXG) does not make arguments, so you would need to remove this whole
102:
based on "stereotypes based on " followed by "stereotypes based on ." An alternative might be to follow the stereotypes through time and history. As of now, a bit list is worth maybe a B if you clean up the rest of the things I mention.
165:. However, this source seems to make enough mention of African American stereotypes. Beginning with paragraph 6 and on, the article seems to just be a copy-paste of the one that is already on Knowledge (XXG),
207:. It is not clear what you are trying to do, sadly. BUt you should not copy text without attribution, should not duplicate subject-matter in WP, and should not launch obviously flawed work into mainspace. --
93:
single sentence that doesn't have a source citation added after it. (Of course, if two or more sentences draw from a single source, you only need the citation at the end of those sentences as a group.)
377:
150:
saying you didn’t write this yourself, but without integrating your information into the article proper, and without adding source citations, the content is not usable on
Knowledge (XXG).
295:
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow
Knowledge (XXG) to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you
118:
Over all, I can see this being a B-quality article if you fix the major sourcing issue. The other things I mention would also help bring it even higher. But sourcing is essential!
174:
Organization: The content you have added is well written, at least. But, again, it needs sources, to be your own work, and to be integrated into the main article to be usable.
179:
As of now, I agree with other users that your contributions are not ready to be added to the main space. I hope you will return to this article and improve it sometime.
381:
304:
300:
51:
Your version posted so far has no lead, so I can't comment on this. I will grade you based on the lead, so be sure your version follows these guidelines:
222:
365:
323:
258:
226:
200:
266:
204:
36:
364:
Noting that I declined the G12 as the page is ineligible, however going forward please try to follow the procedure explained at
22:
303:. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see
242:
110:
It should be relatively easy to find images to add to this article, no? There should be plenty of stuff in the public domain.
328:
288:
249:
308:
312:
355:
336:
212:
58:
Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
369:
351:
332:
208:
184:
123:
373:
262:
270:
166:
162:
261:
requesting that it be speedily deleted from
Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
285:. Knowledge (XXG) takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators
144:
Lead: You did not add a lead, nor update the lead of the article you were editing.
327:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
180:
119:
385:
359:
340:
216:
188:
127:
61:
Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
241:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
55:
Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
347:
318:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
64:
Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
15:
376:
as you agree to do so every time you edit a page, thank you.
350:. I think you're being let down by your course leaders :( --
299:
verify that externally by one of the processes explained at
231:
271:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Stereotypes_of_African_Americans
167:
https://en.wikipedia.org/Stereotypes_of_African_Americans
23:
St._Mary's_College_of_Maryland/Seeing_Race_(Fall_2023)
307:
for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at
163:
https://blog.massmutual.com/planning/soaf-aa-findings
203:. It seems to be an unattributed and poor copy of
265:, because the page appears to be an unambiguous
305:Knowledge (XXG):Requesting copyright permission
263:section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion
239:
301:Knowledge (XXG):Donating copyrighted materials
269:. This page appears to be a direct copy from
67:Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?
8:
346:This is, incidentally, being discussed at
329:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
161:Sources: Here you cite only one source,
139:have made, which are relatively minimal.
243:the guide to writing your first article
259:Draft:Stereotypes of African Americans
227:Draft:Stereotypes of African Americans
201:Draft:Stereotypes of African Americans
195:Draft:Stereotypes of African Americans
7:
378:2601:5CC:8300:A7F0:105:1578:26D:6233
311:for more details, or ask a question
248:You may want to consider using the
368:to help us adhere to the terms of
309:Knowledge (XXG)'s copyright policy
14:
366:WP:Copying within Knowledge (XXG)
21:This user is a student editor in
205:Stereotypes of African Americans
84:Your tone and balance are good.
37:stereotypes of African Americans
76:Your new content looks good.
1:
386:03:25, 19 December 2023 (UTC)
360:19:37, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
341:19:30, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
217:22:16, 17 December 2023 (UTC)
189:15:16, 18 December 2023 (UTC)
128:20:19, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
252:to help you create articles.
199:I've moved your article to
402:
277:, but not as a source of
257:A tag has been placed on
283:say it in your own words
281:. This part is crucial:
320:contest the nomination
267:copyright infringement
254:
236:
88:Sources and References
235:
289:blocked from editing
43:the actual article.
114:Overall impressions
237:
324:visiting the page
29:
28:
393:
234:
106:Images and Media
80:Tone and Balance
16:
401:
400:
396:
395:
394:
392:
391:
390:
255:
232:
230:
223:Speedy deletion
197:
135:
116:
108:
99:
90:
82:
74:
49:
40:
35:Peer review of
12:
11:
5:
399:
397:
389:
388:
362:
250:Article Wizard
238:
229:
225:nomination of
220:
196:
193:
192:
191:
176:
175:
171:
170:
158:
157:
152:
151:
146:
145:
141:
140:
134:
131:
115:
112:
107:
104:
98:
95:
89:
86:
81:
78:
73:
70:
69:
68:
65:
62:
59:
56:
48:
45:
39:
33:
31:
27:
26:
19:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
398:
387:
383:
379:
375:
371:
367:
363:
361:
357:
353:
349:
345:
344:
343:
342:
338:
334:
330:
325:
321:
316:
314:
310:
306:
302:
298:
293:
291:
290:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
253:
251:
246:
244:
228:
224:
221:
219:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
173:
172:
168:
164:
160:
159:
154:
153:
148:
147:
143:
142:
137:
136:
132:
130:
129:
125:
121:
113:
111:
105:
103:
96:
94:
87:
85:
79:
77:
71:
66:
63:
60:
57:
54:
53:
52:
46:
44:
38:
34:
32:
24:
20:
18:
17:
319:
317:
296:
294:
286:
282:
278:
274:
256:
247:
240:
198:
117:
109:
100:
97:Organization
91:
83:
75:
50:
41:
30:
370:WP:CC BY-SA
352:Tagishsimon
333:Tagishsimon
275:information
209:Tagishsimon
156:paragraph.
279:sentences
287:will be
133:Update:
72:Content
374:WP:FDL
181:Abukun
120:Abukun
382:talk
372:and
356:talk
348:here
337:talk
313:here
297:must
213:talk
185:talk
124:talk
47:Lead
331:.
322:by
315:.
384:)
358:)
339:)
292:.
215:)
187:)
126:)
380:(
354:(
335:(
245:.
211:(
183:(
169:.
122:(
25:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.