1277:
course triangularsunset is a spammer! How would you say I started a personal attack? Did I call you a name? Or is this another false accusation like you calling me a spammer. The behavior I am witnessing here seems like paranoia, especially when someone like James drops in and questions it all. A witchhunt if you will that may make you feel like you're defending wikipedia when in fact a culture no one would want to be a part of is being perpetuated (hence the decline in interest in being an editor)...who would want to join a community where they do a lot of hard work only to be spoken to like this: "You have to accept that newbie..."
1015:
several articles. I did not see any of the unmistakable signs of people who come here to spam links into articles, such as persistently adding links either to jut one site or to a very small number of sites, or such as adding fake references that don't support the content they are attached to. If you really do have convincing reasons to believe that the edits were spam then the block should stay, but I honestly cannot see anything that couldn't be easily good faith attempts to improve the referencing of the articles, or (less often) to improve their content.
1223:
newbies without teaching, but i had not experienced that until now. I hope this case can be archived and used as demonstration of how someone like me can make what seemed to be good edits only to have the whole account blocked when i did so much work. I will say it makes me not want to ever contribute again...which you would probably be happy about if I were making a mistake everytime, but then are you saying @JamesBWatson is wrong?
307:
823:
652:
538:
134:
458:
591:
1393:
close to being reason enough to shut down my account. It's a pretty extreme reaction, I think, perhaps akin to me likening the
Knowledge community to Nazis who can't tolerate anything beyond the ideal they set for themselves. But, alas, that is not the case, because I can at least leave without getting gassed (though I can't say the same for my account).
1392:
James: I appreciate your thorough examination, and the time it took, not to mention the courage required to voice an unpopular opinion amidst the feeding frenzy. I understand that some of the links I referenced were not from mainstream publications, but I don't think that constitutes spam, nor comes
1159:
I still don't understand your first warning before i got blocked, i was adding references that went straight to a glossary that supported what i was referencing. Over my 100 edits, i thought i had added some great value, and by the way that site was not for sale when i posted. Sometimes the content
1276:
it seems obvious what James was thinking, don't you think? He said clearly that he reviewed many of my edits and they look fine. Is James a trusted and experienced editor? If yes, then why don't you respect that defense? Sounds like i am a case of confirmation bias...newbies must be spammers so of
1142:
thank you for noticing that in not one single edit is there any evidence that i spammed. i will admit i am new to this and i thought i was finding pages that supported a fact or mention of something on wikipedia pages. i don't see how any of it is commercial, the sites that Dr. K mention included.
1009:
Can either of you clarify why you think this editor's edits have been spam? I have checked a large number of the edits, and it seems to me that the vast majority of the links were references to web sites which genuinely did support content to which they were attached. I found a few exceptions, but
1222:
also, you said i must not understand what is link spam, commercial, etc...I would agree with you about that, if JamesBWatson had not just said what i was doing except a few mistakes were fine, so now i'm feeling very attacked. I had read the veteran editors on wikipedia were vicious about banning
1182:
You got a final warning, because by the time I had detected your activity, you had already serially spammed the "99centrazor.com" link to a large number of shaving-related articles, as well as other spam links to other articles, and you had to be stopped. But, even after my level-4 warning you
1014:
the film, but that kind of mistake is very common indeed among editors with limited experience. Also, although in some cases there were numerous links to the same web site, in all cases that I saw that could be explained by the simple fact that the web sites in question had content relevant to
908:
the page i referenced supported this: television series created by Laeta
Kalogridis....same with every one of the others...not sure why you are claiming them to be spam? a) what do they promote, and does not the referenced page support whatever associated statement in the wiki-article...please
935:, I have to conclude that you lack the competence required to edit Knowledge. The fact that you proceeded to add the same websites to multiple articles where it might sound halfways plausible indicates that your purpose was to add links to those websites, not to improve the articles.
985:). Typically, edits are not deleted either for attribution reasons. When you make an edit, at the bottom of the page right above the publish changes button, you agree to irrevocably release your contribution under CC BY-SA 3.0, and GFDL.
976:
If it is deemed that this entire account is set up as a spam account, can someone delete all of my edits? And the entire account. I would rather have it all deleted than have this indefinitely blocked and labelled a spam account...
1296:? As far as James, there is nothing wrong with him having an opinion. Everyone has an opinion. Trust or experience has nothing to do with their opinion being accepted automatically just because they are trusted or experienced.
265:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
1335:. Most of the links looked like spam to me. If you feel I am in error, please feel free to unblock. That is the purpose of having another admin review the block after all. Thanks, --
1160:
on the pages i sited had to be accessed by scrolling down, but it all seemed right to me. I had studied how other references were used and i thought i was doing the exact same thing.
1110:, we have to conclude that this user has no idea about what constitutes a reliable source, or, conversely, what is commercial linkspam. In either case, this is a rather big problem.
415:, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
267:
1242:. No feigning of ignorance at this late stage will absolve you of this responsibility. As far as what James was thinking when he was defending you, you should ask him, not me.
510:
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at
194:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
863:
692:
255:
969:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
814:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
737:
reason to be unblocked is because not one link has been spam, compare my references to the others and they are in line, review requested of all my edits
483:, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply
1010:
they looked like good faith mistakes rather than spamming: for example in one edit
Triangularsunset linked to a Netflix film rather than to a source
1238:. This will not get you too far. You have to accept that newbie, or not, you serially and methodically defaced many articles with obvious and clear
418:
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
858:
687:
613:
374:
22:
931:
If you genuinely believe a website whose URL ends in "fabian-strategy-in-business.html" is a reliable source that can improve our coverage of
62:
1290:
I had read the veteran editors on wikipedia were vicious about banning newbies without teaching, but i had not experienced that until now.
1076:
1071:
954:
799:
620:
171:
38:
1080:
1046:
The great majority of this account's edits were adding spam sources to articles. This user has repeatedly spammed websites such as "
69:
1050:" "99centrazor.com", "wishmachinery.com", "coolforests.org", "thediamondringreview.com" etc. to many articles. Some of these links
479:
In accordance with our policy that
Knowledge is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia
1063:
378:
140:
121:
1357:
Well, it is evident that I was a lone voice crying in the wilderness, with an unmistakable consensus that you were spamming.
877:
706:
1051:
228:
52:
277:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
57:
366:
318:
296:
835:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
664:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
370:
1103:
353:
1188:
836:
665:
604:
599:
555:
830:
659:
561:
143:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:
314:
300:
1340:
640:
282:
238:
1368:
1055:
1026:
390:
43:
29:
428:
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at
1161:
910:
841:
670:
84:
1336:
1000:
636:
473:
451:
412:
400:
202:
125:
25:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
1067:
511:
440:
429:
110:
96:
80:
33:
480:
382:
92:
514:. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
1177:
565:
278:
273:
234:
145:
This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Knowledge requires
73:
188:
sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for
Knowledge at this time.
91:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1387:
1364:
1326:
1137:
1041:
1022:
386:
349:
271:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
72:, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Knowledge. You can visit
963:
808:
626:
522:
469:
422:
1047:
1408:
1302:
1288:
Please don't feign ignorance. Have you forgotten what you wrote above? Let me remind you:
1248:
1197:
1116:
1059:
785:
574:
436:
408:
327:
106:
1239:
1184:
940:
773:
609:
546:
1293:
1235:
991:
982:
777:
550:
465:
336:
165:
161:
1107:
1106:. If we AGF that all this activity was created because of some misunderstanding of
769:
765:
150:
48:
1097:
254:
1412:
1372:
1344:
1307:
1253:
1202:
1169:
1121:
1030:
993:
944:
918:
789:
644:
579:
526:
518:
444:
394:
335:
While all constructive contributions to
Knowledge are appreciated, pages may be
286:
242:
181:
177:
114:
537:
464:
Hello, Triangularsunset. It has been over six months since you last edited the
133:
1404:
1332:
1297:
1292:
Do I really have to remind you that calling editors "vicious" is a very nasty
1271:
1243:
1217:
1192:
1183:
continued your spamming. This shows a continuing inability to comply with the
1154:
1111:
1004:
781:
569:
936:
590:
359:
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing
986:
932:
619:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the
623:, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:
981:
Just a note - accounts cannot be deleted for technical reasons (see:
88:
21:
Hello, Triangularsunset, and welcome to
Knowledge! Thank you for
201:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
517:
Thanks for your submission to
Knowledge, and happy editing.
983:
Knowledge:FAQ#How_do_I_change_my_username/delete_my_account?
821:
650:
589:
456:
305:
132:
105:, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!
568:
as well as potentially being penalized by search engines.
184:
and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional
951:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
796:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
971:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
816:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
229:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
208:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
1093:
1089:
1085:
891:
887:
881:
872:
868:
854:
850:
846:
772:. Honestly, it looks like you are just here to violate
761:
757:
753:
749:
720:
716:
710:
701:
697:
683:
679:
675:
485:
377:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
218:
210:
101:
342:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
1403:
Enough of that nonsense. Talk page access revoked. --
1143:
So, it is a big deal to see my whole account blocked.
205:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
1191:
guidelines of this wiki, ergo the indefinite block.
829:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
658:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
180:, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is
564:, preventing anyone from linking to them from all
780:, that you have nothing to do with these sites.
776:, but it's at least plausible you don't have a
560:. Persistent spammers may have their websites
484:
168:. Please improve the submission's referencing
8:
326:One source that doesn't even start to neet
100:
764:. All were inappropriate, in violation of
425:of the content if it meets requirements.
1052:are in hosting domains that are for sale
616:, this seems to be your only purpose.
549:link to Knowledge again, as you did at
348:notice, but please explain why in your
1289:
411:. I just wanted to let you know that
7:
190:The comment the reviewer left was:
172:Knowledge:Referencing for beginners
337:deleted for any of several reasons
321:because of the following concern:
139:Your recent article submission to
14:
1360:The editor who uses the pseudonym
1331:I came to the same conclusion as
1018:The editor who uses the pseudonym
536:
253:
58:How to create your first article
748:I picked four edits at random.
268:Articles for creation help desk
212:Articles for creation help desk
162:general guideline on notability
76:to ask questions or seek help.
445:21:01, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
435:Thank you for your attention.
149:coverage about the subject in
102:ask for help on your talk page
68:You may also want to take the
1:
1413:16:43, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
1373:14:31, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
1345:03:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
1308:02:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
1254:02:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
1203:02:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
1170:01:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
1122:22:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
1031:22:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
994:02:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)
945:21:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
919:22:02, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
790:21:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
645:16:03, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
527:22:13, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
176:, so that the information is
44:The five pillars of Knowledge
580:06:33, 18 January 2018 (UTC)
196:when they have been resolved
1234:I see you have started the
833:, who declined the request.
662:, who declined the request.
381:allows discussion to reach
362:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
345:{{proposed deletion/dated}}
192:Please add more references.
1428:
373:exist. In particular, the
287:23:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
243:23:03, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
115:15:16, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
63:Simplified Manual of Style
955:guide to appealing blocks
800:guide to appealing blocks
621:guide to appealing blocks
367:proposed deletion process
39:Contributing to Knowledge
1165:
914:
610:advertising or promotion
1048:American Musical Supply
395:22:33, 6 May 2017 (UTC)
354:the article's talk page
315:Device-guided breathing
301:Device-guided breathing
160:of the subject—see the
53:How to develop articles
826:
655:
594:
558:without further notice
461:
310:
137:
878:change block settings
825:
707:change block settings
654:
631:Your reason here ~~~~
593:
466:Articles for Creation
460:
379:articles for deletion
319:proposed for deletion
309:
141:Articles for Creation
136:
122:Articles for creation
778:conflict of interest
556:blocked from editing
450:Your draft article,
220:reviewer's talk page
486:edit the submission
472:page you started, "
120:Your submission at
93:Knowledge:Questions
79:Please remember to
70:Knowledge Adventure
1189:WP:RELIABLESOURCES
827:
656:
595:
545:; if you insert a
462:
371:deletion processes
311:
138:
49:How to edit a page
23:your contributions
1362:
1181:
1172:triangularsunset
1020:
608:from editing for
452:Draft:Martin D-35
413:Draft:Martin D-35
401:Draft:Martin D-35
297:Proposed deletion
293:
292:
227:You can also use
203:Draft:Martin D-35
175:
83:your messages on
1419:
1391:
1358:
1330:
1305:
1300:
1275:
1251:
1246:
1236:personal attacks
1221:
1200:
1195:
1175:
1162:Triangularsunset
1158:
1141:
1119:
1114:
1101:
1083:
1045:
1016:
1008:
989:
968:
962:
911:Triangularsunset
897:
895:
884:
866:
864:deleted contribs
842:Triangularsunset
824:
813:
807:
726:
724:
713:
695:
693:deleted contribs
671:Triangularsunset
653:
634:
577:
572:
540:
506:
505:
500:
499:
494:
493:
488:
459:
421:You may request
364:
363:
347:
346:
308:
263:Triangularsunset
257:
250:
249:
223:
215:
169:
104:
1427:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1420:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1385:
1324:
1303:
1298:
1294:personal attack
1269:
1249:
1244:
1215:
1198:
1193:
1152:
1135:
1117:
1112:
1074:
1060:Stephen Hawking
1058:
1056:He even spammed
1039:
998:
987:
974:
966:
960:
959:, then use the
948:
922:
885:
875:
861:
844:
837:blocking policy
822:
819:
811:
805:
804:, then use the
793:
739:
714:
704:
690:
673:
666:blocking policy
651:
648:
647:
624:
617:
587:
575:
570:
566:Wikimedia sites
534:
503:
502:
497:
496:
491:
490:
489:and remove the
457:
455:
405:
375:speedy deletion
361:
360:
344:
343:
306:
304:
289:
245:
217:
209:
193:
189:
166:the golden rule
130:
87:by typing four
34:Getting started
19:
12:
11:
5:
1425:
1423:
1401:
1400:
1399:
1398:
1397:
1396:
1395:
1394:
1376:
1375:
1354:
1353:
1352:
1351:
1350:
1349:
1348:
1347:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1312:
1311:
1310:
1281:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1263:
1261:
1260:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1227:
1226:
1225:
1224:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1129:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1034:
1033:
996:
949:
929:
925:Decline reason
906:
902:Request reason
899:
820:
794:
746:
742:Decline reason
735:
731:Request reason
728:
649:
618:
597:You have been
596:
588:
586:
583:
533:
530:
468:submission or
454:
448:
407:Hi there, I'm
404:
398:
385:for deletion.
365:will stop the
333:
332:
303:
294:
291:
290:
260:
258:
247:
233:
232:
225:
206:
191:
144:
131:
129:
118:
66:
65:
60:
55:
46:
41:
36:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1424:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1389:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1374:
1370:
1366:
1361:
1356:
1355:
1346:
1342:
1338:
1334:
1328:
1323:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1309:
1306:
1301:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1283:
1282:
1273:
1268:
1267:
1266:
1265:
1264:
1255:
1252:
1247:
1241:
1237:
1233:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1229:
1228:
1219:
1214:
1213:
1212:
1211:
1204:
1201:
1196:
1190:
1186:
1179:
1178:edit conflict
1174:
1173:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1156:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1139:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1131:
1130:
1123:
1120:
1115:
1109:
1105:
1104:spacemonk.com
1099:
1095:
1091:
1087:
1082:
1078:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1043:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1019:
1013:
1006:
1002:
997:
995:
992:
990:
984:
980:
979:
978:
973:
972:
965:
958:
956:
947:
946:
942:
938:
934:
928:
926:
921:
920:
916:
912:
905:
903:
898:
893:
889:
883:
879:
874:
870:
865:
860:
856:
855:global blocks
852:
851:active blocks
848:
843:
838:
834:
832:
831:administrator
818:
817:
810:
803:
801:
792:
791:
787:
783:
779:
775:
771:
767:
763:
759:
755:
751:
745:
743:
738:
734:
732:
727:
722:
718:
712:
708:
703:
699:
694:
689:
685:
684:global blocks
681:
680:active blocks
677:
672:
667:
663:
661:
660:administrator
646:
642:
638:
632:
628:
622:
615:
614:contributions
611:
607:
606:
602:
601:
592:
585:February 2018
584:
582:
581:
578:
573:
567:
563:
559:
557:
553:, you may be
552:
551:Shaving cream
548:
544:
541:This is your
539:
531:
529:
528:
524:
520:
515:
513:
508:
487:
482:
477:
475:
471:
467:
453:
449:
447:
446:
442:
438:
433:
431:
430:WP:REFUND/G13
426:
424:
419:
416:
414:
410:
402:
399:
397:
396:
392:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
357:
355:
351:
340:
338:
331:
329:
324:
323:
322:
320:
316:
302:
298:
295:
288:
284:
280:
279:TheSandDoctor
276:
275:
270:
269:
264:
259:
256:
252:
251:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:TheSandDoctor
230:
226:
222:
221:
214:
213:
207:
204:
200:
199:
197:
187:
183:
179:
173:
167:
163:
159:
155:
153:
148:
142:
135:
127:
123:
119:
117:
116:
112:
108:
103:
98:
94:
90:
86:
82:
77:
75:
71:
64:
61:
59:
56:
54:
50:
47:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
31:
28:
27:
26:
24:
16:
1402:
1388:JamesBWatson
1365:JamesBWatson
1359:
1337:Dlohcierekim
1327:JamesBWatson
1262:
1138:JamesBWatson
1128:
1042:JamesBWatson
1023:JamesBWatson
1017:
1011:
1001:Dlohcierekim
975:
970:
952:
950:
930:
924:
923:
907:
901:
900:
873:creation log
840:
828:
815:
797:
795:
747:
741:
740:
736:
730:
729:
702:creation log
669:
657:
637:Dlohcierekim
630:
612:. From your
605:indefinitely
603:
598:
554:
543:only warning
542:
535:
532:January 2018
516:
509:
498:{{db-draft}}
478:
463:
434:
427:
423:Userfication
420:
417:
406:
387:Stuartyeates
369:, but other
358:
350:edit summary
341:
334:
325:
313:The article
312:
272:
266:
262:
246:
219:
211:
195:
185:
157:
151:
146:
97:my talk page
95:, ask me on
78:
74:The Teahouse
67:
30:Introduction
20:
562:blacklisted
474:Martin D-35
158:independent
147:significant
126:Martin D-35
869:filter log
698:filter log
504:{{db-g13}}
492:{{db-afc}}
437:HasteurBot
409:HasteurBot
216:or on the
178:verifiable
128:(April 13)
107:Sagecandor
85:talk pages
953:read the
888:checkuser
847:block log
798:read the
717:checkuser
676:block log
512:this link
481:mainspace
383:consensus
317:has been
156:that are
933:Hannibal
909:explain
859:contribs
688:contribs
629:|reason=
328:WP:MEDRS
274:Teahouse
186:reliable
152:reliable
17:Welcome!
1240:WP:SPAM
1185:WP:SPAM
1077:protect
1072:history
964:unblock
882:unblock
809:unblock
774:WP:SPAM
711:unblock
635:. --
627:unblock
600:blocked
507:code.
403:concern
261:Hello!
182:notable
154:sources
1187:, and
1081:delete
519:JMHamo
352:or on
89:tildes
1405:Yamla
1333:Dr.K.
1272:Dr.K.
1218:Dr.K.
1155:Dr.K.
1108:WP:RS
1102:with
1098:views
1090:watch
1086:links
1012:about
1005:Yamla
957:first
802:first
782:Yamla
770:WP:RS
766:WP:EL
501:, or
470:Draft
170:(see
99:, or
1409:talk
1369:talk
1341:talk
1166:talk
1094:logs
1068:talk
1064:edit
1027:talk
1003:and
941:talk
937:Huon
915:talk
786:talk
768:and
762:this
760:and
758:this
756:and
754:this
752:and
750:This
641:talk
547:spam
523:talk
476:".
441:talk
391:talk
283:talk
239:talk
164:and
111:talk
81:sign
51:and
32:and
1367:" (
1299:Dr.
1245:Dr.
1194:Dr.
1113:Dr.
1025:" (
988:SQL
892:log
839:).
721:log
668:).
571:Dr.
299:of
1411:)
1371:)
1343:)
1304:K.
1250:K.
1199:K.
1168:)
1118:K.
1096:|
1092:|
1088:|
1084:|
1079:|
1075:|
1070:|
1066:|
1054:.
1029:)
967:}}
961:{{
943:)
927::
917:)
904::
886:•
880:•
876:•
871:•
867:•
862:•
857:•
853:•
849:•
812:}}
806:{{
788:)
744::
733::
715:•
709:•
705:•
700:•
696:•
691:•
686:•
682:•
678:•
643:)
633:}}
625:{{
576:K.
525:)
495:,
443:)
432:.
393:)
356:.
339:.
285:)
241:)
198:.
124::
113:)
1407:(
1390::
1386:@
1363:"
1339:(
1329::
1325:@
1274::
1270:@
1220::
1216:@
1180:)
1176:(
1164:(
1157::
1153:@
1140::
1136:@
1100:)
1062:(
1044::
1040:@
1021:"
1007::
999:@
939:(
913:(
896:)
894:)
890:(
845:(
784:(
725:)
723:)
719:(
674:(
639:(
521:(
439:(
389:(
330:.
281:(
237:(
231:.
224:.
174:)
109:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
