Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Truthseeker315

Source đź“ť

219: 479: 181: 23: 310: 61: 139: 399:
continually undoing my edit with no reason. He claimed first that it wasn't cited fully (it was, with at least 3 peer-reviewed journal articles) and then he tried other methods. I believe he tried to bully my edit out, by recruiting others to undo my edits so it didn't look like he was edit warring.
116:
on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit
539:. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions. 505:
to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is
506: 502: 193: 185: 430:). You need to convince us that you did not engage in edit warring, not that others may also have engaged in it. I see four reverts over the space of less than half an hour. 158:
over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion. Thank you.
464:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
350: 84: 75:. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the 520: 449: 247: 345: 498: 35: 528: 265: 151: 76: 27: 511:
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means
273: 92: 277: 243: 96: 524: 364: 536: 323: 226: 104: 532: 512: 317: 150:. When adding material that may be controversial, it is good practice to first discuss the changes on the article's 322:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
516: 239: 235: 194:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Truthseeker315 reported by User:Toddst1 (Result: )
189: 109: 88: 72: 40: 485:
This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Knowledge (XXG). It does
87:
for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant
401: 328: 269: 80: 548: 146:, may have introduced material that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been 184:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
289: 427: 143: 68: 31: 515:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the
202: 164: 142:
It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on
127: 50: 543: 458: 253: 426:. Unblock requests need to talk about your actions, not those of others (see specifically, 423: 155: 435: 283: 218: 147: 113: 478: 396: 197: 159: 122: 45: 22: 121:—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. 83:
among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See
60: 551: 439: 431: 409: 297: 207: 169: 132: 55: 242:. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may 138: 250:, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 112:, which states that an editor must not perform more than three 489:
imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.
188:
regarding a possible violation of Knowledge (XXG)'s policy on
308: 217: 59: 38:
and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia.
272:. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek 446:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
466:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
186:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
378: 374: 368: 359: 355: 341: 337: 333: 103:
Being involved in an edit war can result in your being
43:
claims like you are making require exceptional sources.
276:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 316:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
95:. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary 238:. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to 79:to work toward making a version that represents 119:even if you don't violate the three-revert rule 527:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as 175:Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion 8: 71:shows that you are currently engaged in an 30:to Knowledge (XXG) articles, as you did to 264:During a dispute, you should first try to 26:Please do not add commentary or your own 493:Please carefully read this information: 395:I struggled with editing a page, with 34:. Doing so violates Knowledge (XXG)'s 7: 14: 477: 179: 137: 21: 108:—especially if you violate the 67:Your recent editing history at 1: 266:discuss controversial changes 230:from editing for a period of 552:16:40, 30 January 2017 (UTC) 440:14:15, 28 January 2017 (UTC) 410:13:57, 28 January 2017 (UTC) 298:23:52, 27 January 2017 (UTC) 208:23:31, 27 January 2017 (UTC) 170:23:29, 27 January 2017 (UTC) 154:before making them, to gain 133:23:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC) 56:22:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC) 36:neutral point of view policy 320:, who declined the request. 567: 517:purpose of Knowledge (XXG) 450:guide to appealing blocks 248:guide to appealing blocks 240:make useful contributions 405: 503:discretionary sanctions 472:Please read this alert 313: 222: 64: 521:standards of behavior 499:Arbitration Committee 365:change block settings 312: 258:Your reason here ~~~~ 246:by first reading the 221: 63: 529:editing restrictions 105:blocked from editing 314: 274:dispute resolution 244:request an unblock 223: 144:The New York Times 93:dispute resolution 69:The New York Times 65: 32:The New York Times 294: 206: 168: 131: 110:three-revert rule 54: 28:personal analysis 558: 546: 481: 463: 457: 384: 382: 371: 353: 351:deleted contribs 311: 295: 292: 288: 286: 261: 200: 192:. The thread is 183: 182: 162: 141: 125: 48: 25: 566: 565: 561: 560: 559: 557: 556: 555: 544: 541: 540: 501:has authorised 482: 474: 469: 461: 455: 454:, then use the 443: 413: 372: 362: 348: 331: 324:blocking policy 309: 306: 301: 290: 284: 282: 278:page protection 251: 215: 196:. Thank you. 180: 177: 97:page protection 19: 12: 11: 5: 564: 562: 523:, or relevant 483: 476: 475: 473: 470: 444: 420: 416:Decline reason 402:Truthseeker315 393: 389:Request reason 386: 329:Truthseeker315 307: 305: 304:Unblock Appeal 302: 224:You have been 216: 214: 211: 176: 173: 41:WP:EXCEPTIONAL 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 563: 554: 553: 550: 547: 538: 534: 530: 526: 522: 518: 514: 510: 508: 504: 500: 495: 494: 490: 488: 480: 471: 468: 467: 460: 453: 451: 442: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 419: 417: 412: 411: 407: 403: 398: 392: 390: 385: 380: 376: 370: 366: 361: 357: 352: 347: 343: 342:global blocks 339: 338:active blocks 335: 330: 325: 321: 319: 318:administrator 303: 300: 299: 296: 293: 287: 279: 275: 271: 267: 259: 255: 249: 245: 241: 237: 233: 229: 228: 220: 212: 210: 209: 204: 199: 195: 191: 187: 174: 172: 171: 166: 161: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 135: 134: 129: 124: 120: 115: 111: 107: 106: 100: 98: 94: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 70: 62: 58: 57: 52: 47: 44: 42: 37: 33: 29: 24: 16: 542: 496: 492: 491: 486: 484: 465: 447: 445: 421: 415: 414: 394: 388: 387: 360:creation log 327: 315: 281: 263: 257: 236:edit warring 231: 225: 213:January 2017 190:edit warring 178: 136: 118: 102: 101: 66: 39: 20: 17:January 2017 545:Doug Weller 422:Please see 89:noticeboard 513:uninvolved 428:WP:NOTTHEM 356:filter log 285:Acroterion 448:read the 375:checkuser 334:block log 270:consensus 268:and seek 156:consensus 152:talk page 81:consensus 77:talk page 525:policies 346:contribs 256:|reason= 232:48 hours 148:reverted 117:warring— 91:or seek 73:edit war 459:unblock 397:Toddst1 369:unblock 254:unblock 227:blocked 198:Toddst1 160:Toddst1 123:Toddst1 114:reverts 46:Toddst1 537:blocks 519:, our 424:WP:GAB 291:(talk) 535:, or 452:first 432:Yamla 549:talk 533:bans 507:here 497:The 436:talk 406:talk 234:for 203:talk 165:talk 128:talk 51:talk 487:not 379:log 326:). 280:. 99:. 85:BRD 531:, 509:. 462:}} 456:{{ 438:) 418:: 408:) 391:: 373:• 367:• 363:• 358:• 354:• 349:• 344:• 340:• 336:• 260:}} 252:{{ 434:( 404:( 383:) 381:) 377:( 332:( 262:. 205:) 201:( 167:) 163:( 130:) 126:( 53:) 49:(

Index

Information icon
personal analysis
The New York Times
neutral point of view policy
WP:EXCEPTIONAL
Toddst1
talk
22:53, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Stop icon
The New York Times
edit war
talk page
consensus
BRD
noticeboard
dispute resolution
page protection
blocked from editing
three-revert rule
reverts
Toddst1
talk
23:25, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Information icon
The New York Times
reverted
talk page
consensus
Toddst1
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑