1110:, it would appear that he believes I should already topic banned from "articles related to gamergate (broadly construed), sexual identity and gender politics (broadly construed), editors and media involved in the aforementioned, including on Knowledge (XXG) noticeboards" and his actions were taken preemptively of that result. The only actions I have been accused of are perceptions of my motives, and the motives of those engaged in said controversial topics by the blocking admin. For that reason and the fact that is has been brought to AN for review I'll hold off for now.
608:
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. What evidence, much less proof, do you have to support this contention of yours? Moreover, why do you think such a broad-based coalition of people would all come to the same conclusion? I'd encourage you to do some soul-searching about what it is you really believe and what you think others really believe. What do you think
Gamergate stands for, and what do other people think Gamergate stands for?
499:
966:. I think it is unfortunate that we have been less robust up to now. TyTyMan, as I say, you are welcome to appeal, but I strongly suggest that the core of that appeal be your plans to edit in less controversial areas. I completely support that. I do not think you are a bad person, I think you are caught up in something that is long past its sell-by date.
1028:. If "long-time Wikipedians with wide experience" were performing their roles properly, it would not be necessary to say these things. Being single-purpose is not an actionable offense, and it is particularly egregious to try to use blocking to extort a promise to avoid a topic area when there has been no disruptive editing.
607:
However, I'd suggest that you seriously think about what you are claiming — that effectively every major mainstream media outlet has some sort of inherent "bias" against your position. Do you understand that this appears to outside observers as a grossly-overbroad and evidence-free conspiracy theory?
632:
Also, not every media outlet is antiGG. But of the ones who are considered "reliable" that have spoken out on the subject, they have all been anti-GG. But my claim says nothing about the ones who have not spoken on the subject. Though to be honest, having lacked much consideration for these unspoken
788:
is not a suicide pact. If you want to edit in non-controversial areas I'm happy to unblock you, but this project simply does not need more people whose only "contribution" is to perpetuate drama. I don't think that is unreasonable. I apologise for using a term of art that is inappropriate, and have
956:
This account has fewer than 50 edits, and pretty much all of them are engaging in
Gamergate drama. By long-standing consensus those who have been drawn to Knowledge (XXG) by outside activism in order to fight the cause for someone else are treated as sockpuppets. I happen to think that TyTyMang is
961:
whose purpose is
Gamergate (or indeed any other controversial topic). TyTyMang can email me to discuss privately, or ask another admin to review, per the hatnote on my Talk page I do not oppose independent admins unblocking. It is my strong personal view that the number of single purpose accounts
897:
Thats way I am trying to find a solution to this mess. At the current state this user does not deserve a indef. However there must have been something that caused JzG to warrant this block therefore a mitigating sanction might be a compromise as it is just a matter of time before this user will
626:
The thing is, there is plenty of evidence such as the
Knowledge (XXG) article itself being part of the evidence that leads me to that conclusion. Though most notably the "End of Gamers" article collusion along with the mailing list. WP only considers a very narrow range of articles as evidence.
731:
mongers who have substantive contributions to the encyclopaedia, we really don't need new ones who don't. I have blocked this account indefinitely. Feel free to request unblocking, which I will gladly support on the proviso that you undertake to avoid all articles related to gamergate (broadly
638:
In any case, I know what my GG stands for. And it is more than just about ethics in gaming journalism at this point. And from the things I've seen from some of the more predominant members of the opposition I'm more convinced than ever that I've chosen correctly.... Besides, due to the antiGG
1023:
I am currently trying to avoid
Gamergate-related discussion, but I'll provide my 2c since I was pinged. TyTy, whom I have not interacted with, has mostly been posting along two themes: that blocking/banning should be supported by policy, and discussing how to correctly apply
691:
I know editing others' talk page comments is generally considered rude, but I took the liberty of fixing the link you attempted to the AN request (I assume it was just a copy/paste fail, but you actually linked to the editing form for the same section on DS' talk page).
561:. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged
1078:
On that note, I'm not sure email is by default disabled in blocks (I could be wrong). It seems like, if disabled by default, it shouldn't be, specifically so the blocked user can email role accounts like ArbCom, BASC, etc. if they deem necessary.
1309:
1261:
732:
construed), sexual identity and gender politics (broadly construed), editors and media involved in the aforementioned, including on
Knowledge (XXG) noticeboards. In other words: contribute to the encyclopaedia, or get lost.
1259:
discussions leading to this arbitration case, or because you have specifically opted in to receiving these messages. Unless you are a party to this arbitration case, you may opt out of receiving further messages at
912:
The solution is for JzG to explain how the block is per policy, or to revert it. Lacking that, another admin should unblock TyTyMang. "If they were blocked they must be guilty of something" is fallacious logic.
882:
They've done nothing to warrant a topic ban, much less an indefinite block. TyTyMang's crime appears to be criticising the heavy-handed blocks doled out by certain admins, and it results in a heavy-handed block.
1272:
arbitration case have published a revised timetable for the case, which changes what you may have been told when the case was opened. The dates have been revised as follows: the
Evidence phase will close
1322:
1267:
1247:
1235:
565:. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.
1123:
if your contributions are perceived as unhelpful in that area. Not saying they are, just making sure you are aware that this is a procedural unblock, not an endorsement of your past edits.
1008:
has abused his power and should face sanctions, possibly a removal of admin powers. Calling someone a sexist slur and then banning them for little to no reason is absolutely inexcusable.
665:. If you think those policies need to be changed to give gamergate its fair shake, then you will need to change the policies themselves. (good luck with that) (you may wish also to read
1334:
the subsequent actions related to that comment taken by Black Kite, GorillaWarfare, Reaper
Eternal, Kevin Gorman, GregJackP and RGloucester before this case was opened on 29 June 2015.
54:. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Knowledge (XXG). If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place
1115:
I have unblocked this account. While I understand and appreciate Jzg's underlying reasoning we don't really do preemtive blocks and there is a formalized process for enforcing the
510:
74:
or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about
Knowledge (XXG), you might want to consider being "
669:
as
Knowledge (XXG)'s policies have often been critiqued from that angle by supporters of groups and issues that find themselves in the same position as gamergaters.) --
185:
924:
The solution is to unblock the victim who was merely being critical of mods who have been breaking their own rules, and then block and unmod those mods such as
596:
You raise some interesting ideas in your talk page post, but essentially what you're asking is something Knowledge (XXG) fundamentally can't do. Our articles,
962:
related to Gamergate is a large part of the problem. I think the article(s) need long-time Wikipedians with wide experience, not people who have come here to
1331:
the original comment made by Eric Corbett on 25 June 2015 and any subsequent related comments made by him up until the enactment of this current motion; and
229:
83:
1106:
has blocked me for. If I don't know what actions I made in error, then I cannot profess to fix my behavior in the future. But by the rhetoric used by
170:
207:
124:
562:
524:
1102:
Hey guys, thanks for the concern and support. The reason I haven't requested an unblock yet is because I was waiting to see what specific actions
237:
542:
469:
1290:
1224:
1009:
225:
1119:
that arbcom has placed on gemergate and related subjects. So you should note that any user may at any time decide to ask for sanctions at
71:
70:
1086:
990:
216:
421:
203:
693:
357:
550:
280:
220:
639:
flawed-logic position of "Not with me = Against me", I'm also not able to openly take a neutral position on the matter anyways...
807:
It's most definitely unreasonable; contributing in a civil manner to a consensus-forming discussion is not "perpetuating drama."
385:
330:
1286:
1220:
1149:
398:
334:
137:
1067:
51:
604:. If all the reliable sources are biased, as you contend, then Knowledge (XXG)'s articles will necessarily share that bias.
530:
514:
461:
317:
616:
546:
417:
308:
254:
250:
147:
1049:
As I'm unsure if "email disabled" in block means that you can't contact the arbs for appeal, I've gone and asked for a
558:
276:
554:
443:
439:
259:
1308:
via MassMessage on behalf of the Arbitration Committee. You are receiving this message because your name appears on
1210:
1175:
957:
very likely to be a nice person. If so, they are very welcome to edit other content if they'd like. We do not need
352:
271:
212:
670:
759:
538:
343:
312:
241:
129:
75:
45:
612:
1013:
407:
403:
394:
390:
79:
533:
is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means
1082:
784:
fewer than 50 total edits and right at th coal face of one of our longest running and most toxic disputes.
452:
284:
246:
65:
1090:
994:
339:
325:
267:
176:
861:
697:
568:
This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date. —
518:
489:
456:
61:
767:
534:
321:
180:
133:
1174:
Reports of alleged breaches of (2) are to be made only by email to the Arbitration Committee, via the
1128:
834:
755:
413:
380:
1300:
Motion passed in AE arbitration case granting amnesty and rescinding previous temporary injunction
1050:
666:
1063:
770:. And what justification you have for me to avoid such articles (and editors?) as you have noted.
537:
administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the
899:
869:
627:
However, as a not-Knowledge (XXG) human person, my acceptable range of evidence is much broader.
465:
91:
1214:
888:
575:
87:
1285:, two weeks later than originally scheduled. Thank you. On behalf of the arbitration clerks,
1171:, may take or initiate administrative action involving any of the named parties in this case.
447:
263:
1281:, one week later than originally scheduled; the Proposed decision is scheduled to be posted
1033:
946:
915:
843:
827:
809:
86:
for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the
1195:
1168:
963:
958:
785:
348:
165:
1312:
and have not elected to opt-out of being notified of development in the arbitration case.
1124:
903:
873:
95:
1256:
1252:
1191:
1187:
1164:
1160:
1120:
1116:
1054:
662:
654:
601:
1206:
1152:, the Arbitration Committee authorises the following injunction effective immediately:
1025:
658:
597:
498:
82:
to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click
1305:
1107:
1103:
1058:
1044:
1005:
986:
974:
968:
925:
898:
stumble over another problem without having experience in controversial topic areas.
838:
797:
791:
771:
743:
737:
708:
640:
620:
17:
1262:
Knowledge (XXG):Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement/Notification list
884:
569:
143:
1199:
and are therefore restricted as specified in (2). For the Arbitration Committee,
1029:
865:
1277:, one week earlier than originally scheduled; the Workshop phase will close
1201:
600:, are based on information that is verifiable by dint of being published in
754:
I would at least like to know what behavior of mine you find indicative of
1156:
The case is to be opened forthwith and entitled "Arbitration enforcement";
1251:
arbitration case, because you have commented in the case request, or the
855:
1325:
about the injunction and reporting breaches of it are hereby rescinded.
1304:
This message is sent at 12:53, 5 July 2015 (UTC) by Arbitration Clerk
1294:
1228:
1132:
1094:
1072:
1037:
1017:
998:
979:
950:
919:
907:
892:
877:
847:
813:
802:
779:
748:
716:
701:
678:
648:
581:
99:
25:
1245:
You are receiving this message either because you are a party to the
1159:
During the case, no user who has commented about this matter on the
1328:
The Arbitration Committee hereby declares an amnesty covering:
1315:
On 5 July, 2015, the following motion was passed and enacted:
633:
entities, I am not sure of how many they number in currently.
295:
111:
38:
942:"I give any uninvolved admin carte blanche to unblock... "
941:
833:
to ask another administrator to review your block. See
735:
Sorry to be brutal, but seriously, we have had enough.
1321:
Paragraphs (2) and (3) of the Arbitration Committee's
358:
Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (
758:. I believe I'm entitled to at least this much per
860:maybe compromise with a unblock & page ban to
663:made available through reliably published sources
90:field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!
1184:You are receiving this message because you have
64:and ask your question there. Please remember to
655:not built on "evidence" that you may have found
766:isn't very "Clear or Specific" much less very
549:. Administrators may impose sanctions such as
523:The details of these sanctions are described
8:
868:. Or can that only be done by the arbs now?
78:" by a more experienced editor or joining a
1080:
1234:Change from announced time table for the
1057:. Hopefully sensibility will prevail. //
506:Please read this notification carefully:
707:No worries. I very much appreciate it!
1185:
837:for instructions. (Admins: please see
944:. Please read diff for full context.
7:
659:upon what has been found by experts
1186:commented about this matter on the
130:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
14:
989:straight to ani for admin abuse
497:
69:
34:
727:We have more than enough drama
186:Request administrator attention
125:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
589:Knowledge (XXG)'s Five Pillars
1:
1139:Arbitration motion regarding
679:16:17, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
649:09:38, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
621:07:55, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
582:07:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
230:Biographies of living persons
107:
1133:21:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
1095:19:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
1073:19:38, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
1038:14:54, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
1018:14:50, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
999:13:04, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
980:12:47, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
951:12:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
920:11:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
908:11:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
893:11:11, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
878:10:56, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
848:10:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
814:10:48, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
803:07:14, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
780:01:15, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
749:00:17, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
717:10:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
702:10:04, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
588:
100:12:38, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
26:23:47, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
940:Note: JzG (Guy) has stated
488:Notice: sanctions apply to
251:Policy for non-free content
226:What Knowledge (XXG) is not
171:New contributors' help page
1353:
1287:MediaWiki message delivery
1221:MediaWiki message delivery
539:purpose of Knowledge (XXG)
513:has authorised the use of
238:Simplified Manual of Style
166:Frequently Asked Questions
68:on talk pages by clicking
1229:01:30, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
928:for uncivilized behavior.
517:for pages related to the
1295:07:58, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
775:
712:
644:
21:
1269:Arbitration enforcement
1248:Arbitration enforcement
1237:Arbitration enforcement
1141:Arbitration enforcement
1121:arbitration enforcement
1117:discretionary sanctions
959:single-purpose accounts
674:aka The Red Pen of Doom
386:Help develop an article
195:Policies and Guidelines
1329:
1323:motion of 29 June 2015
1319:
823:TyTyMang: you can use
598:by foundational policy
543:standards of behaviour
862:Gamergate controversy
519:Gamergate controversy
490:Gamergate controversy
204:Neutral point of view
1266:The drafters of the
1051:review of your block
839:User_talk:JzG#Policy
835:Template:Unblock/doc
551:editing restrictions
511:community discussion
408:Translating articles
313:Adopt-a-user program
281:Conflict of interest
221:No original research
1004:I agree with this,
985:Don't Appeal, Take
653:Knowledge (XXG) is
613:NorthBySouthBaranof
331:No personal attacks
48:to Knowledge (XXG)!
1196:Case Requests page
1169:Case Requests page
964:Right Great Wrongs
404:Join a WikiProject
399:Requested articles
381:Be bold in editing
335:Resolving disputes
138:Your first article
52:your contributions
1217:
1176:main contact page
1097:
1085:comment added by
1071:
978:
949:
918:
864:like was done to
846:
812:
801:
747:
675:
531:General sanctions
515:general sanctions
485:
484:
481:
480:
477:
476:
318:Assume good faith
292:
291:
242:Three-revert rule
106:
105:
43:Hello, TyTyMang!
1344:
1240:arbitration case
1215:
1061:
1048:
972:
945:
914:
859:
842:
832:
826:
808:
795:
741:
676:
673:
602:reliable sources
578:
572:
501:
462:Useful templates
309:Community Portal
296:
255:Image use policy
208:Reliable sources
112:
108:
73:
58:
39:
35:
1352:
1351:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1302:
1242:
1182:
1181:
1144:
1042:
853:
830:
824:
762:. Calling me a
760:WP:EXPLAINBLOCK
725:
689:
671:
591:
586:
585:
576:
570:
502:
494:
432:
372:
340:Build consensus
301:
277:Deletion policy
196:
158:
148:upload an image
117:
116:Getting Started
102:
56:
33:
12:
11:
5:
1350:
1348:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1332:
1326:
1318:
1317:
1301:
1298:
1241:
1232:
1180:
1179:
1172:
1157:
1146:
1145:
1143:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1112:
1111:
1099:
1098:
1021:
1020:
1010:70.109.186.170
983:
982:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
930:
929:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
789:corrected it.
724:
721:
720:
719:
688:
687:DarknessSavior
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
657:. It is built
635:
634:
629:
628:
590:
587:
545:, or relevant
522:
508:
503:
496:
495:
493:
486:
483:
482:
479:
478:
475:
474:
473:
472:
459:
450:
434:
433:
430:
427:
426:
425:
424:
410:
401:
388:
374:
373:
370:
367:
366:
365:
364:
355:
346:
337:
328:
315:
303:
302:
299:
293:
290:
289:
288:
287:
274:
260:External links
257:
244:
234:
233:
232:
223:
217:Citing sources
210:
198:
197:
194:
191:
190:
189:
188:
183:
173:
168:
160:
159:
156:
153:
152:
151:
150:
140:
127:
119:
118:
115:
104:
103:
66:sign your name
50:Thank you for
42:
32:
29:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1349:
1333:
1330:
1327:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1313:
1311:
1307:
1306:User:Penwhale
1299:
1297:
1296:
1292:
1288:
1284:
1283:9 August 2015
1280:
1276:
1271:
1270:
1265:
1263:
1258:
1254:
1249:
1246:
1239:
1238:
1233:
1231:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1216:ping in reply
1212:
1208:
1204:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1193:
1189:
1177:
1173:
1170:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1151:
1142:
1138:
1134:
1130:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1113:
1109:
1105:
1101:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1077:
1076:
1075:
1074:
1069:
1065:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1046:
1040:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1007:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
996:
992:
988:
981:
976:
971:
970:
965:
960:
955:
954:
953:
952:
948:
943:
927:
923:
922:
921:
917:
911:
910:
909:
905:
901:
896:
895:
894:
890:
886:
881:
880:
879:
875:
871:
867:
863:
857:
852:
851:
850:
849:
845:
840:
836:
829:
815:
811:
806:
805:
804:
799:
794:
793:
787:
783:
782:
781:
777:
773:
769:
765:
764:"drama whore"
761:
757:
753:
752:
751:
750:
745:
740:
739:
733:
730:
722:
718:
714:
710:
706:
705:
704:
703:
699:
695:
686:
680:
677:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
651:
650:
646:
642:
637:
636:
631:
630:
625:
624:
623:
622:
618:
614:
609:
605:
603:
599:
594:
584:
583:
579:
573:
566:
564:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
540:
536:
532:
528:
526:
520:
516:
512:
507:
500:
491:
487:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
454:
451:
449:
445:
441:
438:
437:
436:
435:
431:Miscellaneous
429:
428:
423:
419:
415:
412:Cleaning up:
411:
409:
405:
402:
400:
396:
392:
389:
387:
383:
382:
378:
377:
376:
375:
369:
368:
363:
361:
356:
354:
353:Mailing lists
350:
347:
345:
341:
338:
336:
332:
329:
327:
323:
319:
316:
314:
310:
307:
306:
305:
304:
300:The Community
298:
297:
294:
286:
282:
278:
275:
273:
272:Sock puppetry
269:
265:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
245:
243:
239:
236:
235:
231:
227:
224:
222:
218:
214:
213:Verifiability
211:
209:
205:
202:
201:
200:
199:
193:
192:
187:
184:
182:
181:make requests
178:
177:ask questions
174:
172:
169:
167:
164:
163:
162:
161:
155:
154:
149:
145:
141:
139:
135:
131:
128:
126:
123:
122:
121:
120:
114:
113:
110:
109:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
81:
77:
72:
67:
63:
59:
53:
49:
47:
41:
40:
37:
36:
30:
28:
27:
23:
19:
1314:
1303:
1282:
1279:26 July 2015
1278:
1274:
1268:
1250:
1244:
1243:
1236:
1200:
1183:
1147:
1140:
1087:165.91.13.25
1081:— Preceding
1041:
1022:
991:82.39.42.100
984:
967:
939:
822:
790:
763:
736:
734:
728:
726:
690:
610:
606:
595:
592:
567:
529:
505:
504:
470:User scripts
444:Disambiguity
379:
371:Things to do
360:The Signpost
359:
349:IRC channels
344:Village pump
157:Getting Help
88:edit summary
55:
44:
15:
1275:5 July 2015
694:76.69.75.41
395:Peer review
391:Maintenance
144:edit a page
80:WikiProject
1125:Beeblebrox
756:WP:NOTHERE
535:uninvolved
457:Talk pages
453:User pages
440:Categories
285:Notability
247:Copyrights
175:Where to:
57:{{helpme}}
1310:this list
723:No thanks
667:WP:FRINGE
422:Vandalism
326:Etiquette
268:Vandalism
62:talk page
1083:unsigned
1059:coldacid
1045:TyTyMang
772:TyTyMang
709:TyTyMang
641:TyTyMang
611:Cheers.
547:policies
322:Civility
142:How to:
134:Tutorial
60:on your
31:Welcome!
18:TyTyMang
16:Hello!
1194:or the
1192:AE page
1188:AN page
1167:or the
1165:AE page
1161:AN page
1068:contrib
885:Xezbeth
828:unblock
593:Tyler,
571:Ryūlóng
414:General
76:adopted
46:Welcome
1219:) via
1190:, the
1163:, the
1150:motion
1030:Rhoark
947:NE Ent
916:NE Ent
866:Rhoark
844:NE Ent
810:NE Ent
786:WP:AGF
729:whores
672:TRPoD
559:blocks
541:, our
492:topics
1055:WP:AN
975:Help!
900:Avono
870:Avono
798:Help!
768:civil
744:Help!
557:, or
466:Tools
448:Stubs
92:Avono
1291:talk
1225:talk
1202:L235
1129:talk
1091:talk
1064:talk
1034:talk
1026:WP:V
1014:talk
995:talk
904:talk
889:talk
874:talk
776:talk
713:talk
698:talk
661:and
645:talk
617:talk
563:here
555:bans
525:here
418:Spam
264:Spam
96:talk
84:here
22:talk
1255:or
1148:By
1108:Guy
1104:Guy
1053:at
1006:Guy
987:Guy
969:Guy
926:Guy
856:JzG
841:).
792:Guy
738:Guy
132:•
1293:)
1257:AE
1253:AN
1227:)
1213:/
1209:/
1131:)
1093:)
1036:)
1016:)
997:)
906:)
891:)
876:)
831:}}
825:{{
778:)
715:)
700:)
647:)
619:)
580:)
577:琉竜
553:,
527:.
509:A
468:•
464:•
455:•
446:•
442:•
420:•
416:•
406:•
397:•
393:•
384:•
351:•
342:•
333:•
324:•
320:•
311:•
283:•
279:•
270:•
266:•
262:•
253:•
249:•
240:•
228:•
219:•
215:•
206:•
179:•
146:•
136:•
98:)
24:)
1289:(
1264:.
1223:(
1211:c
1207:t
1205:(
1178:.
1127:(
1089:(
1070:)
1066:|
1062:(
1047::
1043:@
1032:(
1012:(
993:(
977:)
973:(
902:(
887:(
883:—
872:(
858::
854:@
800:)
796:(
774:(
746:)
742:(
711:(
696:(
643:(
615:(
574:(
521:.
362:)
94:(
20:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
