634:
controversial ,like the EM drive, which would warrant careful examination. I cannot think of a single physics journal which would even discuss a new reactor design, unless we are still living in the 50 and 60 when nuclear tech was something new, , it is simply not in their scope anymore. Plus
Knowledge has a plethora of articles regarding other related reactor designs, like the IMSR, like the Thorcon, like the Stable Salt Reactor, and they do have pages, The reactor design I propose and these other reactors have many points in common, but there are also inherent differences from seeing things from different perspectives and priorities, like some designs prioritizing the burn of transuranics while others prioritizing low maintenance or low upfront costs , just an example. BUT all of them are based on the same physics principals, I do not understand why my particular design has to prove something which has been proven for the last 50 years or so. I respectfully request your reexamination of the logic behind the decision that you need more physics and engineering reports as a cause for this rejection. Thank you.
709:
and there was only one mention of it in a one liner . The only reason that I later added links to the company was because the first refusal mentioned there were no references. I also took a peak at how other paper reactor designs were being presented on wikipedia ( that is reactors that were never built yet, we call them paper reactors in the industry, but which are being proposed by different companies, and lately by a lot of startups ), and all of their pages did have mentioned in the articles the company which is developing each of the designs, Further more, some of these articles had entire sections of the article dedicated to the parent company, if you wish I can provide links to prove my claims. So I considered that it is a normal thing to do, as others have done it too, in my case I didnt dwell to much on it, just a simple phrase about who is developing it, without saying anything else. So you see you can hardly catalog this as , and I quote you. """Knowledge is not for organisations or people to publish about themselves as
Knowledge is not a web host (
713:) or for promotion""" . As I stated already this is a page intended to make it easy to anyone to find a little information about a new reactor design being proposed, it is not a personal page , it is not a company promoting page. I just wish there is no double standard applied when a much younger design is not allowed to have a proper wiki page while other designs, barely a few years older do have this right and further more the said pages include a lot more information on the companies that develop these designs, again, I can provide links to such pages if you wish me to.
542:
388:
716:
there are no others who would now the design into more detail than us, and I was under the impression that wikipedia was striding to have articles with information presented as accurately as possible. Thank you for your time, I much appreciate your insight and I hope we can reach a conclusion which will be mutually acceptable.
715:
As to me being the chief designer of the HSR, if there were a third party involved, aka publishing a wiki page on the HSR design, there is a high risk of things being poorly or inaccurately presented and as such would warrant an intervention, either by me or one of my colleagues because, simply put,
708:
Hi again, I want to make a few clarifications first because I believe some wrong assumptions were made. My submission is NOT about the company, is about a reactor design that is being under development, as you already know the first submitted version didnt have any links to the company whatsoever ,
633:
The article I wrote is not about a new theory or about a device employing the physics like the EM drive, this is about a reactor design repackaging a collection of known technologies which have been either in use or talked about largely on the nuclear scene for the last decades, it has nothing
523:
Hy, I am the founder of
Aristos power and the chief designer of the HSR, I hope we agree that it doesnt get more reliable as a source. I have added external links to the company pages, hope this helps. Cheers
492:, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
494:
32:
133:
579:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
421:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
482:
319:
354:
233:
360:
74:
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
184:
39:
118:
577:
For a subject like this we expect serious physics and engineering journal articles as sources, definitely not facebook or linkedin.
71:
70:
64:
686:
653:, Knowledge has a number of policies that you need to be aware of. Firstly "Articles generally require significant coverage in
548:
529:
394:
375:
690:
305:
156:
693:
applies... in summary, editing with a COI is strongly discouraged and highly scrutinised. Hope that explains things, Cheers
65:
613:
455:
349:
179:
504:, a friendly space on Knowledge where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
279:
340:
689:
for for full list of what we are not. Finally as you state that you are the "founder of the company" then the policy
677:. Secondly Knowledge is not for organisations or people to publish about themselves as Knowledge is not a web host (
257:
587:
533:
429:
379:
570:
416:
238:
397:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
682:
551:
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dodger67 was:
208:
123:
113:
717:
650:
635:
301:
698:
509:
465:
262:
83:
710:
678:
666:
59:
330:
268:
223:
47:
623:
500:
345:
274:
218:
498:. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
326:
694:
505:
461:
79:
75:
213:
151:
674:
658:
566:
412:
161:
619:
228:
670:
662:
654:
554:
400:
128:
481:
562:
408:
541:
387:
725:
702:
643:
627:
513:
469:
87:
78:. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing!
58:
on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to
665:) so adding the company web page, FB and Linked-In fails to show
586:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
428:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
296:
540:
386:
614:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
593:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
456:
Knowledge's real-time chat help from experienced editors
435:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
42:
to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out
603:
595:
445:
437:
590:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
432:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
280:
Discover what's going on in the
Wikimedia community
565:. If you need help with referencing, please see
561:sources are required so that information can be
411:. If you need help with referencing, please see
407:sources are required so that information can be
308:, where you can send them messages and comments.
553:This submission is not adequately supported by
399:This submission is not adequately supported by
195:
100:
24:
8:
241:– a Wizard to help you create articles
219:Our new user help forum, the Teahouse
7:
575:The comment the reviewer left was:
547:Your recent article submission to
393:Your recent article submission to
14:
480:
320:Click here to start a new topic.
69:
63:
687:Knowledge:What Knowledge is not
597:Articles for creation help desk
495:Articles for creation help desk
439:Articles for creation help desk
691:Knowledge:Conflict of interest
1:
726:10:34, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
703:20:18, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
644:15:31, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
628:12:08, 23 November 2016 (UTC)
514:21:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
470:21:18, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
317:Put new text under old text.
124:The five pillars of Knowledge
96:
88:21:19, 22 November 2016 (UTC)
20:
581:when they have been resolved
423:when they have been resolved
134:Intuitive guide to Knowledge
60:sign your name on talk pages
588:User:Typhon Antaeus/sandbox
430:User:Typhon Antaeus/sandbox
325:New to Knowledge? Welcome!
234:New contributors' help page
30:Hello, Typhon Antaeus, and
741:
209:Frequently asked questions
185:Simplified Manual of Style
567:Referencing for beginners
413:Referencing for beginners
355:Be welcoming to newcomers
180:How to develop an article
119:Contributing to Knowledge
721:
639:
224:Where to ask a question
143:Finding your way around
545:
391:
350:avoid personal attacks
549:Articles for Creation
544:
530:Articles for creation
395:Articles for Creation
390:
376:Articles for creation
33:welcome to Knowledge!
681:) or for promotion (
669:as they are neither
605:reviewer's talk page
447:reviewer's talk page
157:Department directory
661:of the topic" (see
528:Your submission at
374:Your submission at
269:Knowledge etiquette
546:
392:
361:dispute resolution
322:
263:Join a WikiProject
129:How to edit a page
76:edit summary field
46:below, ask at the
40:your contributions
612:You can also use
520:
519:
454:You can also use
371:
370:
341:Assume good faith
318:
295:
294:
291:
290:
287:
286:
192:
191:
152:Table of contents
95:
94:
732:
671:reliable sources
655:reliable sources
620:Roger (Dodger67)
608:
600:
555:reliable sources
484:
477:
476:
450:
442:
401:reliable sources
297:
258:Community Portal
249:How you can help
196:
171:Editing articles
101:
97:
73:
67:
56:
55:
25:
21:
740:
739:
735:
734:
733:
731:
730:
729:
683:WP:NOTPROMOTION
630:
602:
594:
578:
574:
538:
516:
472:
444:
436:
420:
384:
367:
366:
336:
250:
201:
172:
144:
106:
105:Getting started
91:
53:
52:
19:
12:
11:
5:
738:
736:
718:Typhon Antaeus
714:
706:
705:
651:Typhon Antaeus
636:Typhon Antaeus
632:
618:
617:
610:
591:
576:
571:Citing sources
552:
539:
537:
526:
522:
518:
517:
490:Typhon Antaeus
487:
485:
474:
460:
459:
452:
433:
417:Citing sources
398:
385:
383:
372:
369:
368:
365:
364:
357:
352:
343:
337:
335:
334:
323:
314:
313:
310:
309:
302:Typhon Antaeus
293:
292:
289:
288:
285:
284:
283:
282:
277:
271:
265:
260:
252:
251:
248:
245:
244:
243:
242:
239:Article Wizard
236:
231:
226:
221:
216:
211:
203:
202:
199:
193:
190:
189:
188:
187:
182:
174:
173:
170:
167:
166:
165:
164:
162:Help directory
159:
154:
146:
145:
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
131:
126:
121:
116:
108:
107:
104:
93:
92:
38:Thank you for
28:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
737:
728:
727:
723:
719:
712:
711:WP:NOTWEBHOST
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
684:
680:
679:WP:NOTWEBHOST
676:
672:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
648:
647:
646:
645:
641:
637:
629:
625:
621:
615:
611:
607:
606:
599:
598:
592:
589:
585:
584:
582:
572:
568:
564:
560:
556:
550:
543:
536:(November 23)
535:
531:
527:
525:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
497:
496:
491:
486:
483:
479:
478:
475:
471:
467:
463:
457:
453:
449:
448:
441:
440:
434:
431:
427:
426:
424:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
396:
389:
382:(November 22)
381:
377:
373:
362:
358:
356:
353:
351:
347:
344:
342:
339:
338:
332:
328:
327:Learn to edit
324:
321:
316:
315:
312:
311:
307:
303:
299:
298:
281:
278:
276:
272:
270:
266:
264:
261:
259:
256:
255:
254:
253:
247:
246:
240:
237:
235:
232:
230:
227:
225:
222:
220:
217:
215:
212:
210:
207:
206:
205:
204:
198:
197:
194:
186:
183:
181:
178:
177:
176:
175:
169:
168:
163:
160:
158:
155:
153:
150:
149:
148:
147:
141:
140:
135:
132:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
115:
112:
111:
110:
109:
103:
102:
99:
98:
90:
89:
85:
81:
77:
72:
66:
61:
57:
49:
45:
41:
36:
35:
34:
27:
26:
23:
22:
16:
707:
631:
604:
596:
580:
558:
521:
499:
493:
489:
473:
446:
438:
422:
404:
200:Getting help
114:Introduction
62:by clicking
51:
44:Getting Help
43:
37:
31:
29:
695:KylieTastic
675:independent
659:independent
506:KylieTastic
462:KylieTastic
80:KylieTastic
54:{{Help me}}
50:, or place
667:Notability
601:or on the
443:or on the
229:Help pages
214:Cheatsheet
657:that are
363:if needed
346:Be polite
306:talk page
273:Practice
48:help desk
685:) - see
563:verified
559:Reliable
501:Teahouse
409:verified
405:Reliable
331:get help
300:This is
275:civility
534:sandbox
488:Hello!
380:sandbox
267:Follow
17:Welcome
663:WP:42
359:Seek
722:talk
699:talk
640:talk
624:talk
569:and
510:talk
466:talk
415:and
348:and
84:talk
673:or
649:Hi
304:'s
68:or
724:)
701:)
642:)
626:)
583:.
557:.
532::
512:)
468:)
425:.
403:.
378::
329:;
86:)
720:(
697:(
638:(
622:(
616:.
609:.
573:.
508:(
464:(
458:.
451:.
419:.
333:.
82:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
