485:
308:
428:
instances of
Spencer intentionally overlook or downplaying one ayat and emphasizing another. For this reason, I don't think that his "readings" of the Qur'an are "correct" at all. In those prior discussions I referred you to, not only are such claims scrutinized, but also his claims that "all of the major scholars" and schools of Islamic law support his particular narrative. The simple fact is, they don't.
669:
596:
27:
361:
434:
So it begs the question as to why and under what standards anyone would consider
Spencer an "reliable expert". It is one thing to engage in cogent criticism resulting from an objective, careful study: it is quote another to be a fountain of reactionary sectarian polemics. As someone who has studied
430:
Note that I've been recently debating with
Davidelah regarding Bernard Lewis. Lewis has taken exception to the polemics of people like Spencer, and he also cites sources and references to support his argument. Lewis is certainly no shrinking violet when it comes to criticism, and his academic record
212:
Therefore, the proper discussion area for the “side-issue” (persuasive arguments) between
Jagerman and Skyeking is at their USER Talk Pages. In addition Uikku, if you (and others) desire further discussion about your “Why?” question then said discussion will take place here on your USER Talk Page –––
404:
Actually my intention was that someone like you would point that the method (naskh) is not really cherry picking but vice versa. It is really a method to reject cherry picking. It makes reading Quran easier for a muslim and a non-muslim, but one must know its existence and importance. So I thank you
233:
Please respond at my User Talk Page within 72-hours. If you don’t, I will assume you are in agreement with me. In addition, regarding your contested edit, I will consider it a “Reference Point” (Uikku USER Talk Page) to others who may have the same “Why?” question – thereby preventing discussion of
427:
Yet naskh (or 'nasikh', I've most often heard the term pronounced this way) was not at all what I was referring to. What I did refer to is described in detail in a discussion in the talk archives of his page, as well as the discussion on why he is not a reliable source, which offers numerous
681:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
372:, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the
608:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
551:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
709:
636:
693:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
620:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
405:
for pointing that. I also wanted to point that
Spencer had enough discipline to use that same naskh because correct reading of Quran is based on that. That means his method was not cherry picking. --
435:
the requisite languages and worked in the field now for 25 years, I can tell you with full confidence that
Spencer is quite obviously engaging in the latter.
82:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
323:, in spite of the fact that there is no attempt to create an article, and without checking context.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to
87:
114:
723:
650:
576:
340:
502:
141:
52:
719:
646:
572:
91:
56:
187:
Hopefully we are not at an impasse. And my communication (written words) is being presented in a “friendly” manner (WP: EQ).
702:
629:
272:
563:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
714:
641:
568:
365:
328:
34:
220:
Once again, my hope is that we are not at an impasse, and that as responsible
Editors we can reach an understanding.
204:
for general conversation about the Article’s subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions on the topic of
76:
315:
60:
41:, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:
144:. Knowledge is a collaberative effort--and I am very thankful to you for improving my article. Take care.
38:
460:
264:
149:
384:
349:
324:
296:
320:
286:
690:
617:
368:. Please remember to mark your edits as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with
517:
491:
484:
564:
377:
95:
68:
292:
Would you please stop linking it? There is no reason to believe it will ever have an article. —
75:
notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on
440:
240:
145:
677:
604:
586:
540:
531:
381:
346:
293:
686:
613:
560:
544:
334:
195:“...helping other Editors to interact with and understand those with whom they are working.”
103:
701:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
628:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
559:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
511:
369:
307:
698:
625:
556:
548:
373:
83:
694:
621:
552:
436:
236:
431:
as an expert is, especially in comparison to someone like Spencer, undeniably sound.
26:
668:
595:
99:
51:
All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Knowledge's
464:
406:
118:
251:
137:
398:
What's up with posting to my talk page and then deleting it? You wrote:
705:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
632:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
360:
200:“Keep on topic: The Article Talk Pages are for discussing the Article,
179:
Section: Notability, single-source, and potential conflict of interest
727:
654:
580:
525:
498:
472:
444:
414:
387:
352:
299:
280:
244:
217:
at the VHEMT Article Talk Page. Otherwise, is Knowledge Violation.
153:
126:
107:
547:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
258:
708:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
635:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
505:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
483:
306:
86:, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the
25:
459:
By the way, I would suggest you to move discussions about
159:
Dispute Resolution – Article Editor Requests Your Response
63:). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
140:
for putting inline citations in the article I created:
55:, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "
689:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
616:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
380:
and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —
261:
in which you are asked to participate. Thanks. ---
539:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
319:temporarily from editing for repeated linking of
327:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
8:
171:Voluntary Human Extinction Movement (VHEMT)
22:Proposed deletion of A Dragon This Way Comes
190:Uikku (maybe others too) you asked “Why?”
490:Hello, Uikku. You have new messages at
37:template has been added to the article
331:by adding below this notice the text
206:how to improve the associated Article
117:. What could possibly induce that? --
7:
678:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
605:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
234:the “Why?” at the Article Talk Page.
175:CONTESTED EDIT (Article Talk Page):
662:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
463:to the most relevant talk page. --
115:rumors of Knowledge losing editors
14:
565:review the candidates' statements
667:
594:
359:
142:Chiasso financial smuggling case
712:and submit your choices on the
571:. For the Election committee,
541:Arbitration Committee election
532:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
728:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
691:Knowledge arbitration process
655:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
618:Knowledge arbitration process
581:13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
526:17:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
499:17:02, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
456:What have I deleted and when?
127:04:38, 16 December 2009 (UTC)
94:, where it may be deleted if
675:Hello, Uikku. Voting in the
602:Hello, Uikku. Voting in the
388:23:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
353:23:56, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
300:23:45, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
281:15:28, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
177:23:32, 31 March 2010 – Uikku
108:02:25, 6 February 2009 (UTC)
639:and submit your choices on
567:and submit your choices on
61:Knowledge's deletion policy
745:
720:MediaWiki message delivery
647:MediaWiki message delivery
637:the candidates' statements
573:MediaWiki message delivery
473:14:17, 1 August 2011 (UTC)
339:, but you should read the
445:17:31, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
415:06:05, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
341:guide to appealing blocks
325:make useful contributions
245:02:18, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
84:proposed deletion process
468:
154:03:30, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
122:
88:speedy deletion criteria
461:Robert Spencer (author)
250:Real world examples of
39:A Dragon This Way Comes
492:Acroterion's talk page
488:
311:
257:There is a discussion
98:to delete is reached.
53:criteria for inclusion
30:
687:Arbitration Committee
614:Arbitration Committee
587:ArbCom Elections 2016
545:Arbitration Committee
487:
310:
165:(WP:CIV) – (WP:FIVE)
92:Articles for Deletion
90:or it can be sent to
57:What Knowledge is not
29:
183:Hello Fellow Editor,
549:arbitration process
337:|Your reason here}}
321:advance information
287:advance information
198:ANSWER is at WP:TPG
163:Knowledge: Civility
703:arbitration policy
630:arbitration policy
589:: Voting now open!
561:arbitration policy
503:remove this notice
489:
366:your contributions
312:
266:RepublicanJacobite
193:ANSWER is at WP:UP
31:
522:
329:appeal this block
35:proposed deletion
736:
671:
598:
523:
520:
516:
514:
506:
363:
338:
279:
275:
267:
74:
73:
67:
17:Uikku says "Hi".
744:
743:
739:
738:
737:
735:
734:
733:
732:
731:
672:
664:
659:
658:
642:the voting page
599:
591:
569:the voting page
535:
518:
512:
510:
507:
496:
481:
396:
370:Help:Minor edit
344:
332:
290:
278:
273:
265:
262:
255:
161:
135:
133:Hey, thank you!
71:
65:
64:
24:
12:
11:
5:
742:
740:
710:the candidates
673:
666:
665:
663:
660:
600:
593:
592:
590:
584:
538:
534:
529:
497:Message added
495:
482:
480:
477:
476:
475:
457:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
420:
419:
418:
417:
395:
392:
391:
390:
364:Thank you for
356:
355:
313:You have been
305:
289:
284:
274:The'FortyFive'
270:
254:
248:
235:
232:
230:
229:
227:
225:
221:
219:
218:
211:
210:
209:
199:
197:
196:
194:
192:
191:
189:
188:
184:
182:
181:
180:
178:
176:
174:
170:
168:
164:
160:
157:
134:
131:
130:
129:
49:
48:
23:
20:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
741:
730:
729:
725:
721:
717:
716:
711:
706:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
683:
680:
679:
670:
661:
657:
656:
652:
648:
644:
643:
638:
633:
631:
627:
623:
619:
615:
610:
607:
606:
597:
588:
585:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
542:
533:
530:
528:
527:
524:
521:
515:
504:
500:
493:
486:
478:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
455:
454:
447:
446:
442:
438:
432:
426:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
416:
412:
408:
403:
402:
401:
400:
399:
393:
389:
386:
383:
379:
376:of clear-cut
375:
371:
367:
362:
358:
357:
354:
351:
348:
342:
336:
330:
326:
322:
318:
317:
309:
304:
303:
302:
301:
298:
295:
288:
285:
283:
282:
277:
276:
269:
268:
260:
253:
249:
247:
246:
242:
238:
224:Wiki Regards,
222:
216:
207:
203:
185:
172:
166:
158:
156:
155:
151:
147:
146:ProfessorPaul
143:
139:
132:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
110:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
89:
85:
80:
78:
77:its talk page
70:
62:
58:
54:
47:
44:
43:
42:
40:
36:
28:
21:
19:
18:
713:
707:
684:
676:
674:
640:
634:
611:
603:
601:
536:
509:
508:
433:
429:
410:
397:
382:Arthur Rubin
347:Arthur Rubin
314:
294:Arthur Rubin
291:
271:
263:
256:
223:
214:
205:
201:
186:
173:
167:
162:
136:
113:I have read
81:
50:
45:
32:
16:
15:
715:voting page
699:topic bans
626:topic bans
557:topic bans
513:Acroterion
501:. You can
69:dated prod
695:site bans
622:site bans
553:site bans
378:vandalism
374:reversion
252:steampunk
138:Thank you
96:consensus
479:Talkback
437:Jemiljan
237:Skyeking
228:(WP: EQ)
226:Skyeking
169:ARTICLE:
394:Spencer
343:first.
335:unblock
316:blocked
46:nn book
543:. The
519:(talk)
385:(talk)
350:(talk)
297:(talk)
100:Oo7565
59:" and
465:Uikku
407:Uikku
119:Uikku
724:talk
685:The
651:talk
612:The
577:talk
469:talk
441:talk
411:talk
259:here
241:talk
231:P.S.
150:talk
123:talk
104:talk
537:Hi,
215:not
202:not
726:)
718:.
697:,
653:)
645:.
624:,
579:)
555:,
471:)
443:)
413:)
345:—
333:{{
243:)
152:)
125:)
106:)
79:.
72:}}
66:{{
33:A
722:(
649:(
575:(
494:.
467:(
439:(
409:(
239:(
208:.
148:(
121:(
102:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
