User talk:Ulner - Knowledge (XXG)

720:, framförallt med tanke på att ni blockerade fel person och gör falska bevis genom att ljuga åt mig som bevisar att jag var skyldig! Hur kan ni behandla mig såhär?! Dessutom är det bara OK att jag diskuterar här på engelska Knowledge (XXG). Det är ju inte mitt fel att ni inte vill ha era disk.sidor fyllda av mina inlägg, det är ju erat egna problem, eftersom ni inte behandlar andra rätt, och ni begriper ju inte det!! Ni begriper inte NÅGONTING! Och vet ni varför? Det är för att ni bara anklagar fel person och gör falska bevis mot mig genom att ljuga mot mig! Om jag tycker att min blockering är felaktig (som den faktiskt är nu) så har jag rätt att diskutera det om och om igen om ni vägrar att avblockera mig. Om ni inte hade blockerat mig från början hade inte jag gjort någonting. Dessutom är det inte jag som gör fel, det är ni själva som gör fel, begriper ni inte det, eller begriper ni kanske ingenting?! Det är ju inte mitt fel att andra kommer och plockar bort flaggor som den där Mr Bullitt gjorde. Tror ni kanske att han har rätt att göra så?! Ja, det tror ni och det har jag ett bevis på; Ni uppmanar inte honom att sluta och blockerar bara fel person, den som försöker åtgärda det. Ni tror också att det är mitt fel att jag skapar krig genom försvenskningar och det gör jag inte, eftersom det är korkade idioter som sabbar för mig och ni tror att det är jag som är den idioten och det har jag också bevis på; Ni blockerar mig och bara ljuger åt mig genom att säga: "Det var Björns fel, inte ditt fel" till den som gjorde fel. Ni ljuger så bara för att ni ska kunna göra falska bevis och då kunna blockera fel person! Där ser man ju på! Det var alltså inte mitt fel och dessutom hade jag inte svurit någonting till er om ni inte hade blockerat mig! Nu ska ni gå och avblockera mig och det 700:. Det är de som ställt till det för mig och förstört mina editeringar, så att jag blev ilsken och gjorde det som osrsakade min blockering och därför vill jag be dig att du (eller någon annan) går och blockerar dem för det som de gjort mot mig. Mr Bullitt polckade bort flaggmallar som jag satte in. De andra användaren ogjorde mina ändringar när jag försvenskade omdirigeringar och därför ska de blockeras av dig eller nån annan och samtidigt som ji gör det, ska ni avblockera mig för ert misstag. Det kräver jag och det borde jag ha rätt att kräva. Nu förstår du varför jag reagerade så kraftigt och om ni inte avblockerar mig nu med det samma, slutar jag här på Knowledge (XXG)! Tror du att jag tycker det är roligt att det är kul att jobba med er om ni behandlöar mig på ett sånt här sätt? Det är inte ett dugg kul! Jag gjorde ju inget, men ni påstår bara något annat för att ni ska kunna blockera mig genom att göra falska bevis! Förstår du nu hur förbannad jag är på er?! Jag är förbannad på dig också för att du inte litar på mig! Du fortsätter ju bara att säga att jag har gjort fel, det var ju inte jag, det var ju de här två användarna! Vad gör ni då?! Ni gör falska bevis som bevisar att det var mitt fel, när det var tvärtom! Hur kan ni ljuga så till mig?! Begriper ni inte vad ni gör för fel eller va?! Ni tror att ni förstår er på mig och varför jag gör såhär. Ni förstår ju inte 476:

underlying. It is rare in liquid markets that a speculator buyer actually keeps the contract to expiration and takes delivery. The following fake example illustrates: You write a contract to provide 30 gallons of gasoline for $ 5.00 per gallons on October 15, 2009. Today i buy, go long, your contract at market value ($ 3.00per gallon). If in August gasoline goes up to $ 4.00, i'm happy because i could sell before expiration in August and make a buck per gallon, but no, i am greedy and keep the contract. In October gasoline drops to $ 2.00 per gallon and i have to take delivery (there's no option here, i have to take delivery) at $ 5.00 per gallon per your contract. So i have to dish out extra cash from what i paid originally to cover the $ 5.00 pergallon contract, a big loss. You on the other hand, can buy at the market ($ 2.00pergallon) and deliver it to me for $ 5.00per gallon, a big profit. That's the mechanics.

524:

when the interest rate change, the equation changes. Although it is a fair question to ask which short-term interest rate to use? I don't want to change the topic, so i'll be quick on this, a call option is a legal contract, just like a futures contract is a legal contract, just like a put option is another legal contract...only their legal obligations are different. The difference in legal duties between these three different contracts is NOT very interesting at all. What IS interesting is the equations that define these three contracts. Like i said above, futures are much simpler than options because there is only one contract involved and futures do not depend on implied volatility. To get a feel for the simplicity, try analyzing these strategies: buying a futures contract versus a diagonal butterfly options spread. Bottom line is that a formal definition of a futures contract rest with its equation. Cheers.

468:, a precise formulation for a fututres contract involves the equation for the theoretical value F = (s * e) - D where F = Theoretical Futures Price s = Spot Index Price e = 2.7183 which is the Natural Exponential Function r = short-term interest rate t = number of days to futures expiration/360 D = dividends, expressed in index points, for stocks going ex-dividend prior to futures expiration. But note that this equation can be stated in several other equivalent forms. The "definition" provided in the article is extremely general, it's handwaiving at best, i would get rid of it and replace it with an equation (formal definition) mixed in with some text. 570:? And again, a good question to ask is which short interest rate to use. If you do not see why interest rate would enter into the equation for a futures contract, you need to think about exactly what a futures contract is...specifically an index futures contract. In such a contract, when the implied cost-of-carry interest rate is near zero or sometimes negative, a clearly absurd condition, arbs rush in to feed on the bottom line. You got to take the time to drill down into what a futures contract really is, start with the S&P, Naz, & Dow futures and cash. I've just given you a wealth of information, don't blow it. 1338:

so your insinuations are problematic and I don't have any COI. The issue is NOT Stockpair (who cares about them..), but Pair Options, and you consistently avoid this discussion. Knowledge (XXG) is meant to democratize information, and the fact you support only big coprporations and media is exactly counter productive to this goal. Again,Pair Options,are a type of relative performance options, and as such, are very interesting for the public.

1278:). In the end, in order for other people to write and verify about this topic of pair option, they need these reliable sources -- they can't just be expected to ask you, an anonymous person on the Internet, for verification....which brings up the question Ulner's been repeatedly asking you: where did you learn about this stuff? If you can't answer adequately, it's reasonable to assume there is a COI problem here. 1691: 1618: 1079:

might stop posting the links. i've seen the guide lines, and they state that no link should be targeting a website that promotes sales and other profitable items, and binaryoptionsexplained.com doesn't do any off the things stated in those guide lines. so do me a favor, i don't know how much Financial-edu.com pay you to keep that link up but you're passing your own guide lines!

152: 789: 1309:

options. Pair options does not seem to be a special case of the alpha index options from NASDAQ, and for that reason I urge you to continue looking for some reliable source. If no reliable sources can be found, the article should be deleted in my opinion. I hope this does not discourage you from continuing working on Knowledge (XXG).

587:

Nowhere in this definition of the option contact does Black-Scholes formula appear. In a similar way, nowhere in the definiton of e.g. a forward contract do the equation you specified above appear. I mean that it is possible to give a definition of a futures contract without refeering to the equation above.

855:

deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the

523:

You say "legal duties" but your article entry ("definition") says nothing about legal duties. The equation describes (defines) the behavior of a futures contract more fully than related legal issues. There are relatively no assumptions in the equation, there's no need to keep interest rates constant,

497:

Good idea to link to the book, although the page where futures contract are defined are not available on Google Books at the moment. By definition I mean a clear presentation of the legal duties of the buyer and seller of the futures contract. The formula you explained gave, what I know, dependent on

1337:

You can "butt " and condescend as much as you want,however,I would more appreciate an open discussion on the topic. First of all, I did not write the topic !I just edited it, becuase I was curious about the function of Pair Options, as a matter of fact, I first heard about them in Knowledge (XXG)!!

912:

I am so fed up with this challenging task that I wish I had never started it. There is no end in sight and I don't see why I should spend the time to comment on what everybody can see. Ever once in a while I check the discussion page for any comments from others and I'll be perfectly happy to answer

1273:

for a "pair option", then your article will be deleted. That's how Knowledge (XXG) works. You don't get to put anything on Knowledge (XXG); you don't get to write about your dog, your spouse (unless they are famous...of course). You certainly don't get to write about a company you're involved in

1243:

Hi, that is not the case. Alpha Index Options(which I believe I directed you too) are a new NASDAQ product. NASDAQ are a private compnay. Do you support one compnay over the other? I do not know the other company, but every financial instrument that has interest to the public should be here. If you

1078:

information about trading, and not even targeted to binary options... so as long as you do that i find no reason why not to put a website that provide FREE information, targeted on binary options, it's a good source to continue the study people begin doing here. explain to me where i am wrong and i

1006:

Thanks for demobilizing me. I've had it with this article. I wasted way too many weeks, even months on it and now you keep me busy teaching me about etiquette. As a matter of fact, I've had it with editing Knowledge (XXG). (A robot once destroyed a whole page on my own talking page I was working on

565:

Forget options for now. Forget Hull. Forget forward price (hell, everything is forward pricing, even the cash is forward looking in the market). I don't know how else to get you to focus on the bottom line. The futures equation posted above is how fair value is calculated, again, that is the bottom

664:

Jag vet att du har varnat mig om att sluta skriva inlägg och därför ska jag skriva en sista sak, jag kommer att sluta här om jag inte får en avblockering. Kom ihåg det! Jag tycker inte att det är ett dugg roligt att jobba med såna här idiotiska administratörer som går och trakasserar användare som

130:

Hi, I noticed you added an entry to the disambiguation on Liouville's theorem. I was wondering if you knew roughly where you came across this theorem, or what it said. It sounds as if it's related to the theorem in complex analysis, either as a generalisation or a corollary, and knowing which, if

1047:

May i ask the reason why you blocking web sites (www.pidolphin.com) which provides free advanced financial calculator in many asset classes ? There are many external links in many wiki pages which is not blocked or verified. PiDolhin is purely an educational web site based on many financial text

475:

General comment. A futures contract is much simpler than an option, where there are two "contracts" involved (a call and a put). There's only one contract involved in futures, the buyer at expiration is obligated to receive delivery of the underlying, while the seller is obligated to provide the

931:

Believe me I wish I had never started this and if I have to explain all the changes I make I am just going to call it quits. I have done this in an on/off manner partly because I was discouraged, partly because I am very busy during the week with stressful activities that do not allow me to do

586:

Thanks for the reply. To try to focus on the bottom line: By definition of a financial contract I mean the contractual obligations of the different parties. For an call option the writer of the option is legally "forced" to give a stock to the buyer of the option if the buyer pays the premium.

546:

But your equation is the equation for the forward price. For futures it is known that under certain interest rate assumptions, the futures price is the same as the forward price - see e.g. Hull. I mean that the definition of the futures contract should not (and need not) include any mention of

1308:

WilliamG - I am grateful you have taken time to create the new pair option article! Knowledge (XXG) depends on people helping out to create new content. However, I disagree whether this article is important enough to be kept. The reason is that there are no available reliable sources for pair

1366:

You have ideas about what Knowledge (XXG) is, but the pages I cited above in links are official policies of Knowledge (XXG). If you don't agree with them because they "support only big corporations and media", then you shouldn't edit Knowledge (XXG) at all. If you can't be bothered to even

925:

To answer your questions, per WP:BOLD you are welcome to make bold changes to any article at any time. If someone disagrees, then you did to work out a solution via talk, but if you edits you want to make are unlikely to cause objection than you should just make them. You don't need anyone's

1703:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1030:

It seems strange that some robot could destroy a page - it should always be possible to get the old version back. I suggest you ask someone for help if that happens in the future. Anyhow, I wish you the best and hope you continue contributing to Knowledge (XXG). Best regards

1244:

think relative performance options are interesting, than your actions does not make sense.I am putting a lot of efforts to contribute, seems that you put a lot trying to block them. Can we be productive? I think we should work together to the benefit of the readers.

471:

Comment. Using single stock futures as an example would not be my advice because these things (instruments) are relatively new and relatively low liquidity. My advice is to use popular futures like eurodollar (currencies) or better yet, S&P500 futures (stock

1630:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1328:

Pair Options are not a special case of AlphaIndex - on the contrary, Alpha Index are a special case of Pair Options!! can you explain why do you think Pair Options are not.... and please, refer to the subject itself, if possible. (not sources..

341:

I would be glad to help out with a new entry, but i've got no plans for an edit by myself at the moment. With all due respect to you and speaking without meaning to offend you, but directing my statement to the author of this definition as cited,

916:

Is this the protocol at Knowledge (XXG)? (I was told otherwise by an administrator, or something like that. He/she wrote to just go ahead and make changes and deal with challenges - if any - on the discussion page) If so please send me a link.

935:

Some of the changes are just in the order of sections, I left untouched (for the time being?) even though I question the relevance. The article is also way too bulky but then again how do you deal with a man like Kreuger in a short manner?

857: 247:

Hello, why did you remove all the external links from the article? I'm sorry, but I fail to see how is Binary Option different from video sharing or file sharing services, that do include external links to the various companies? Cheers.

942:

If there are changes you do not like tell me on the discussion page, please. But keep in mind, if I have to spend a lot of time DURING the editing work on defending what I am doing I will not make any headway in the tasks ahead.

1026:". This is an extreme exaggeration of my edit- it is easy to put your old edit back exactly the way it was before my revert. Anyone who want to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) have to be kind to other editors and assume good faith. 452: 1367:

sincerely try and understand helpful links provided by me, for example, then I can't be bothered to hold you patiently by the hand while you repeat the same irrelevancies. If you don't provide any reliable sources (per

1731: 1658: 1528:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 1283:

By the way the sources you've included thus far do not seem to be about "pair options" per se, but related topics like NASDAQ's Alpha Index. Now, I find it hard to believe you are comparing stockpair.org to

1194:

Hi, why are you so fixated on discussing the web site ? why not discuss this very interesting derivative ? did you see what NASDAQ has came out with ? why cant we discuss the message and not the messenger?

761:

will be released in 24 hours and there is a request pending for a permanent block. I strongly advise you to show some submissiveness if you have any intension to future contributions to Knowledge (XXG).

346:. Suggest a complete rewrite using better researched references that make sense, again, be glad to help out. PS- thanks for posting "Tool for adding..." on you user page...i was not aware of this tool. 1715:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1642:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1431:

Hi Ulner. I noticed your name before while scanning the histories of some finance pages...clearly you have done substantive work here thus far! I hope to reach your level in the future :-) --

609:

It appears that you're asking more for something that would be handled by one of the "oversight group" - they are the ones that would deal with something like this. Find the instructions at

453:

http://books.google.co.uk/books?hl=en&lr=&id=nh6zHOf9tn0C&oi=fnd&pg=PA5&dq=Arbitrage+theory+in+continuous+time&ots=ZUankNCAwq&sig=N1FoGzZju7qehTqIfL4bygAhUmM

1022:

This is a collaboration and you should respect other users - they are also trying to improve the encyclopedia. I hope you can understand that I don't get very happy when I read "

503:

For options you have a buyer and an issuer - I don't really follow your discussion about that two contract should be involved at the same time (call option & put option).

270: 1288:....however, note there are independent sources for Alpha Index. In fact, they have received much fanfare....the topic being worthy of a mention in The Financial Times 1399:

Claiming I did not make any attemt to fix is totally wrong, you can even ask Ulner. I think your intentions here are to prove something , and not constructive at all

1048:

books. It is unfair to be blocked. I am sure many financial engineering students will use www.pidoplhin.com when they study financial (derivatives) theorems. regards

325:

the statement “at time “T”, the holder pays” is incorrect…at time “T” the holder pays nothing, holder has already paid for the contract…the holder receives 100 shares

1467: 185:, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at 1111:

Thank you very much for your help, appreciate it,do you know any good way to transform eqations for microsoft equation editor so i can insert them into wiki?

32: 1582: 1294:. Do you really believe this is a fair comparison? What NASDAQ does is of interest to a great many people. Stockpair...not so many, to put it kindly. -- 328:

the definition is not formal but general (formal involves mathematics, such as interest rates, index(cash or spot price), dividends, and days to expiration)

1375:

tag on the article. Unlike Ulner's tags, which you removed without making any attempt to fix the issues pointed out, you won't find it simple to remove

92: 1074:

I wouldn't mind not putting a website as long as there aren't any other website being promoted here, you are finding it ok to promote a website that

778: 692:

En sak till måste jag skriva till dig, du vet varför jag reagerade så kraftigt och därför vill jag att du och nån annan går och blockerar användarna

76: 636:

Hej, jag såg din varning på min diskussionssida. OK, jag slutar redigera här på era diskussionssidor, men du ska bara begripa en sak, att jag är

1578: 681: 656: 52:

to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

1745: 1672: 1553: 893:: When you move a page, you should check to see if you've created any double redirects, and fix them. (In this case, I've done that now.) 547:

interest rate. Compare for example with the definition of a option contract which does not refer to interest rates or volatility. Regards

96: 1055: 610: 1175:

Oh, appologize for deleting, will not be done again, still learning and a bit overwhelmed... enjoy our discussion and your comment --

95:

on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out

946:

Btw, I have been working on more changes for the last few hours and lost all further motivation for today because of your request.

206:

Heya, I've noticed you've been contributing to articles similar to mine, i.e. related to activist/anarchist people. My article on

757:) is monstrous and your reluctance to follow the simple rules of behaviour is outstanding. Your block on Swedish Knowledge (XXG) 729: 28: 1741: 1668: 1549: 1415: 1354: 1211: 1159: 1127: 479:

Lastly (the variables s,t,T, etc). I think in bullet #3 “t”≠“T”, but the "definition" is confusing to me and you may be right.

1724: 1651: 693: 312:

and wanted to give you some friendly feedback to possibly collaborate to improve the entry. Here are some priliminary points:

195:

this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.

61: 49: 1575:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1260: 820: 1095: 987:

I don't know how to revert to my last edit. Please put the section back as it was: I spent hours and hours working on it.

812: 167: 1540:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to

704:!! Nu har jag motiverat mig riktigt noga och ska därför avblockeras, oavsett vad ni tycker om mitt uppträdande! Ni vet 81: 1736: 1663: 1545: 1289: 1567:

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited

1012: 992: 973: 954: 297: 816: 116:

Sorry, I have no other info on translations. Perhaps you could google the title and author to find it on the net.

1766: 1762: 1475: 1436: 1384: 1299: 1292: 677: 652: 24: 1143:

Thanks, I have a sound equation for pricing Pair Options and other exotic options, so I guess I will study it.

861: 56: 1712: 1639: 224: 88: 575: 529: 484: 351: 1059: 898: 873: 767: 466:("Here by formal I meant a precise formulation which is 100% clear. We can delete the word formal I guess.") 1403: 1342: 1248: 1199: 1147: 1115: 1083: 1051: 1008: 988: 969: 950: 808: 669: 644: 20: 603: 1541: 640:

på erat korkade uppträdande mot mig! Gör aldrig om detta! BjörnBergman 20 december 2009 kl. 13:30 (UTC)

393:

Here by formal I meant a precise formulation which is 100% clear. We can delete the word formal I guess.

847: 571: 525: 480: 347: 71: 697: 1471: 1432: 1380: 1295: 1223:

That web page is the only webpage which mentions "pair options", in principle the only known source.

673: 648: 620: 308:

Hello Ulner. Ran across the 30 May 2009 entry "Formal_definition_of_futures_contract" in the article

1699: 1626: 1608: 1517: 1508: 807:

for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on

1411: 1350: 1207: 1180: 1155: 1123: 253: 1708: 1635: 1537: 1521: 1087: 237:

I go to random talk pages and look for friends. will u be my friend? PLZ? respond on my talkpage.

1256: 894: 867: 211: 207: 764: 269:

Hello, Ulner. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at

826:

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding

1598: 1091: 803:, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see 296:

Due to the song it became a very well known phrase leading to all sorts of uses like these...

1720: 1647: 1533: 1525: 819:

their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the

804: 175: 1774: 1498: 1490: 841: 796: 782: 566:

line. "Forward pricing" is a hogwash concept in the bottom line. Do you know what i mean by

309: 215: 113:

I finally dug up my reference notes on de Sitter space and put it on the WP de Sitter page.

1723:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1716: 1650:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1643: 1536:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1529: 1372: 1275: 800: 299: 263: 210:

is threatened of deletion, could you please vote to keep it? You can vote . In solidarity!

186: 1568: 939:

There is so much more to do: What would be the advantage of commenting on my own changes?

831: 614: 275: 197: 190: 159: 1368: 1270: 968:

What does it mean the section is arranged in an incorrect way? Use the talk page please.

193:

if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that

1407: 1346: 1203: 1176: 1151: 1119: 361:

Thanks for your comment. I will have a look at this tomorrow, and give a longer reply!

249: 132: 799:

requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under

728:!!!! Har ni en förklaring till varför ni gjorde såhär mot mig så gå och skriv ner den 1589:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these

1252: 845:(just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on 434:

I mean a citation which takes one directly to the source, like this (but best to use

344:

this entry is the biggest piece of crap i have come across in Knowledge (XXG) to date

241: 181:

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting

100: 66: 1594: 1590: 1690: 1617: 740: 1770: 1494: 182: 171: 170:

from Knowledge (XXG). The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because

163: 145: 788: 746: 151: 1447: 1310: 1224: 1032: 736:

Björn, Your harassments and stalkings have now gone way too far. Your record (

588: 548: 504: 408: 394: 362: 292: 117: 752: 135: 1002:

Congratulations! You are a fine bureaucrat. And you are still lecturing me.

273:

regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--

926:

permission to act here. --ThaddeusB (talk) 00:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

1727:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1654:

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

1524:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)

964:

Please stop deleting my work without valid explanation on the talk page

174:

is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see

749: 387:

I think now this definition is not good enough to be moved to the top.

1285: 334:

definitions should lead the article…it should be moved up to the top

755: 743: 1778: 1749: 1676: 1602: 1557: 1502: 1479: 1455: 1440: 1419: 1388: 1358: 1303: 1232: 1215: 1184: 1163: 1131: 1099: 1063: 1016: 996: 977: 958: 902: 879: 771: 685: 626: 596: 579: 556: 533: 512: 488: 416: 402: 370: 355: 281: 257: 219: 200: 120: 103: 36: 1572: 1269:

Let me butt in here with a quick comment. If you can't provide

1730:

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review

1657:

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review

432:("What does line citation linkable means? link to a website?") 131:

either, would make looking for a source easier. All the best,

1769:) ? I've just "finished" with a major expansion. Thank you. 851:

explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for

787: 150: 390:

What does line citation linkable means? link to a website?

178:

for our minimum information standards for short articles.

166:, by another Knowledge (XXG) user, requesting that it be 1711:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1638:

is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the

1571:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 890: 737: 291:

Have a look at the last couple of seconds of this....

271:

Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

498:

certain assumptions such as constant interest rates.

983:

I am fuming! You destroyed several hours of my work

1468:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Pair options 1516:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 316:”s”, the current present time is not well difined 1563:Disambiguation link notification for November 25 913:questions or criticism there, if there are any. 920:This is part of the message I am referring to: 384:T is indirectly defined as the expiration time. 16:Thank you for welcoming me to Knowledge (XXG) 801:section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion 319:“T” is not properly labeled as expiration date 1274:without others supervising/advising you (see 932:anything at the end of the day but watch TV. 842:the page that has been nominated for deletion 381:I changed the formulation about payment at T. 8: 99:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 1761:Hi Ulner. Could I ask you to please review 1007:for an edit for this very article.) Ciao, 864:the page or have a copy emailed to you. 811:subjects and should provide references to 87:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 1466:If you're interested, here is the link: 856:page does get deleted, you can contact 445: 97:Knowledge (XXG):Where to ask a question 611:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for oversight 7: 1700:2017 Arbitration Committee elections 1627:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 1489:Answer to your question (of 2009!): 331:the line citation should be linkable 1713:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1640:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 57:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 1684:ArbCom 2017 election voter message 1024:I'm disguted at what you have done 14: 1542:review the candidates' statements 1470:. I'll notify WilliamG also. -- 1371:) in several days, I will put an 1689: 1616: 1491:User_talk:Pol098#Negative_number 1734:and submit your choices on the 1548:. For the Election committee, 1518:Arbitration Committee election 1509:ArbCom elections are now open! 1291:, and the Wall Street Journal 158:Hello, this is a message from 1: 1677:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1603:11:25, 25 November 2015 (UTC) 1558:13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 772:19:12, 21 December 2009 (UTC) 686:15:10, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 407:I guess t can be equal to T. 1750:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC) 1697:Hello, Ulner. Voting in the 1624:Hello, Ulner. Voting in the 220:18:33, 22 October 2008 (UTC) 201:16:03, 22 October 2007 (UTC) 104:23:20, 10 January 2006 (UTC) 77:How to write a great article 1661:and submit your choices on 1544:and submit your choices on 1446:Thanks for your comment! �� 1317:) 18:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC 1064:11:57, 26 August 2010 (UTC) 903:17:54, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 880:16:55, 1 January 2010 (UTC) 627:00:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC) 225:sv:Användardiskussion:Ulner 189:. Feel free to contact the 162:. A tag has been placed on 37:20:52, 30 August 2009 (UTC) 1794: 1779:15:10, 11 April 2022 (UTC) 1742:MediaWiki message delivery 1669:MediaWiki message delivery 1659:the candidates' statements 1550:MediaWiki message delivery 1480:18:20, 30 April 2011 (UTC) 1456:18:08, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 1441:16:01, 25 April 2011 (UTC) 1420:16:15, 27 April 2011 (UTC) 1389:16:03, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 1359:15:19, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 1304:07:25, 26 April 2011 (UTC) 1233:12:31, 24 April 2011 (UTC) 1216:06:29, 24 April 2011 (UTC) 1185:12:50, 23 April 2011 (UTC) 1164:22:07, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 1132:22:01, 22 April 2011 (UTC) 1100:23:16, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 718:riktigt ovanligt idiotiskt 378:s is not the current time. 1763:Financial risk management 1757:Financial risk management 1017:00:20, 19 July 2010 (UTC) 997:22:50, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 978:22:43, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 959:22:38, 18 July 2010 (UTC) 795:A tag has been placed on 597:18:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 580:17:56, 31 July 2009 (UTC) 136:13:11, 25 July 2007 (UTC) 1503:14:51, 17 May 2013 (UTC) 1451: 1314: 1228: 1036: 908:/* Changes to Kreuger */ 592: 557:23:32, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 552: 534:22:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 513:10:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC) 508: 489:22:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 417:13:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 412: 403:13:02, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 398: 371:23:21, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 366: 356:21:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC) 282:23:06, 8 June 2009 (UTC) 258:11:54, 31 May 2009 (UTC) 121:03:31, 8 June 2007 (UTC) 1485:Answer to your question 885:Fixing double redirects 698:sv:Användare:Mr Bullitt 125: 1427:Thank for your comment 860:to request that they 792: 427:Here are my two-cents. 155: 25:Anorexic Salad Fresser 1709:Arbitration Committee 1636:Arbitration Committee 1609:ArbCom Elections 2016 1522:Arbitration Committee 1373:Articles for Deletion 791: 665:inte gjort nånting! 430:The easy point first 154: 1591:opt-out instructions 1462:AFD for pair options 805:Knowledge (XXG):Stub 716:uppträdande! Det är 604:Talk:Donald Boström 375:Some short comments: 322:missing that “t”≠“T” 176:Knowledge (XXG):Stub 1526:arbitration process 858:one of these admins 126:Liouville's Theorem 1725:arbitration policy 1652:arbitration policy 1611:: Voting now open! 1581:• Join us at the 1538:arbitration policy 1395:to DudeOnTheStreet 1333:to DudeOnTheStreet 793: 156: 144:Little context in 62:How to edit a page 48:Hello, Ulner, and 1586: 1423: 1406:comment added by 1362: 1345:comment added by 1265: 1251:comment added by 1219: 1202:comment added by 1167: 1150:comment added by 1135: 1118:comment added by 1103: 1086:comment added by 1054:comment added by 1043:www.PiDolphin.com 726:riktigt förbannad 689: 672:comment added by 661: 647:comment added by 632:Från BjörnBergman 40: 23:comment added by 1785: 1693: 1620: 1576: 1422: 1400: 1361: 1339: 1271:reliable sources 1264: 1245: 1218: 1196: 1166: 1144: 1134: 1112: 1102: 1080: 1066: 1009:Gatorinvancouver 989:Gatorinvancouver 970:Gatorinvancouver 951:Gatorinvancouver 876: 870: 837: 836: 830: 813:reliable sources 797:Sheen T. Kassouf 783:Sheen T. Kassouf 688: 666: 660: 641: 623: 617: 455: 450: 438:wikified tool): 310:Futures contract 304:Futures contract 280: 168:speedily deleted 160:an automated bot 39: 17: 1793: 1792: 1788: 1787: 1786: 1784: 1783: 1782: 1759: 1754: 1753: 1694: 1686: 1681: 1680: 1664:the voting page 1621: 1613: 1583:DPL WikiProject 1569:Tenor (finance) 1565: 1546:the voting page 1512: 1493:. Best wishes, 1487: 1472:DudeOnTheStreet 1464: 1433:DudeOnTheStreet 1429: 1401: 1397: 1381:DudeOnTheStreet 1340: 1335: 1326: 1296:DudeOnTheStreet 1246: 1241: 1197: 1192: 1173: 1145: 1141: 1113: 1109: 1081: 1072: 1049: 1045: 1004: 985: 966: 910: 887: 874: 868: 834: 828: 827: 786: 779:Speedy deletion 724:innan jag blir 667: 642: 638:mycket missnöjd 634: 621: 615: 607: 459: 458: 451: 447: 306: 289: 274: 267: 245: 235: 149: 128: 111: 109:De Sitter space 82:Manual of Style 18: 12: 11: 5: 1791: 1789: 1758: 1755: 1732:the candidates 1695: 1688: 1687: 1685: 1682: 1622: 1615: 1614: 1612: 1606: 1564: 1561: 1515: 1511: 1506: 1486: 1483: 1463: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1428: 1425: 1396: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1334: 1331: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1318: 1280: 1279: 1240: 1237: 1236: 1235: 1191: 1188: 1172: 1169: 1140: 1137: 1108: 1105: 1071: 1068: 1044: 1041: 1028: 1027: 1003: 1000: 984: 981: 965: 962: 909: 906: 886: 883: 821:Article Wizard 785: 781:nomination of 776: 775: 774: 633: 630: 606: 601: 600: 599: 583: 582: 562: 561: 560: 559: 541: 540: 539: 538: 537: 536: 516: 515: 500: 499: 494: 493: 492: 491: 477: 473: 469: 457: 456: 444: 443: 442: 441: 440: 439: 428: 422: 421: 419: 405: 391: 388: 385: 382: 379: 376: 373: 339: 338: 335: 332: 329: 326: 323: 320: 317: 305: 302: 288: 285: 266: 261: 244: 239: 234: 231: 229: 205: 180: 179: 148: 142: 140: 127: 124: 110: 107: 93:sign your name 85: 84: 79: 74: 69: 64: 59: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1790: 1781: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1756: 1752: 1751: 1747: 1743: 1739: 1738: 1733: 1728: 1726: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1705: 1702: 1701: 1692: 1683: 1679: 1678: 1674: 1670: 1666: 1665: 1660: 1655: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1637: 1632: 1629: 1628: 1619: 1610: 1607: 1605: 1604: 1600: 1596: 1592: 1587: 1584: 1580: 1574: 1570: 1562: 1560: 1559: 1555: 1551: 1547: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1527: 1523: 1519: 1510: 1507: 1505: 1504: 1500: 1496: 1492: 1484: 1482: 1481: 1477: 1473: 1469: 1461: 1457: 1453: 1449: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1438: 1434: 1426: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1413: 1409: 1405: 1394: 1390: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1374: 1370: 1365: 1364: 1363: 1360: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1332: 1330: 1323: 1316: 1312: 1307: 1306: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1272: 1268: 1267: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1226: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1189: 1187: 1186: 1182: 1178: 1170: 1168: 1165: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1138: 1136: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1085: 1077: 1069: 1067: 1065: 1061: 1057: 1056:80.254.146.36 1053: 1042: 1040: 1038: 1034: 1025: 1021: 1020: 1019: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1001: 999: 998: 994: 990: 982: 980: 979: 975: 971: 963: 961: 960: 956: 952: 947: 944: 940: 937: 933: 929: 928: 924: 921: 918: 914: 907: 905: 904: 900: 896: 895:Michael Hardy 892: 884: 882: 881: 878: 877: 872: 871: 863: 859: 854: 850: 849: 848:the talk page 844: 843: 833: 824: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 802: 798: 790: 784: 780: 777: 773: 770: 769: 766: 760: 756: 753: 750: 747: 744: 741: 738: 735: 734: 733: 731: 727: 723: 719: 715: 711: 707: 703: 699: 695: 694:83.250.33.239 690: 687: 683: 679: 675: 671: 662: 658: 654: 650: 646: 639: 631: 629: 628: 624: 618: 613:for removal. 612: 605: 602: 598: 594: 590: 585: 584: 581: 577: 573: 572:Henry Delforn 569: 564: 563: 558: 554: 550: 545: 544: 543: 542: 535: 531: 527: 526:Henry Delforn 522: 521: 520: 519: 518: 517: 514: 510: 506: 502: 501: 496: 495: 490: 486: 482: 481:Henry Delforn 478: 474: 470: 467: 463: 462: 461: 460: 454: 449: 446: 437: 433: 429: 426: 425: 424: 423: 420: 418: 414: 410: 406: 404: 400: 396: 392: 389: 386: 383: 380: 377: 374: 372: 368: 364: 360: 359: 358: 357: 353: 349: 348:Henry Delforn 345: 336: 333: 330: 327: 324: 321: 318: 315: 314: 313: 311: 303: 301: 300: 298: 294: 293: 286: 284: 283: 279: 278: 272: 265: 262: 260: 259: 255: 251: 243: 242:Binary option 240: 238: 232: 230: 227: 226: 222: 221: 217: 213: 209: 203: 202: 199: 196: 192: 188: 184: 177: 173: 169: 165: 161: 153: 147: 143: 141: 138: 137: 134: 123: 122: 119: 114: 108: 106: 105: 102: 98: 94: 90: 83: 80: 78: 75: 73: 70: 68: 65: 63: 60: 58: 55: 54: 53: 51: 46: 45: 41: 38: 34: 30: 26: 22: 1765:(especially 1760: 1735: 1729: 1706: 1698: 1696: 1662: 1656: 1633: 1625: 1623: 1588: 1566: 1513: 1488: 1465: 1430: 1402:— Preceding 1398: 1376: 1341:— Preceding 1336: 1327: 1247:— Preceding 1242: 1198:— Preceding 1193: 1174: 1146:— Preceding 1142: 1114:— Preceding 1110: 1082:— Preceding 1075: 1073: 1046: 1029: 1023: 1005: 986: 967: 948: 945: 941: 938: 934: 930: 927: 923: 922: 919: 915: 911: 888: 866: 865: 852: 846: 839: 825: 794: 763: 758: 725: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 701: 691: 674:BjörnBergman 663: 649:BjörnBergman 637: 635: 608: 567: 465: 448: 435: 431: 343: 340: 307: 295: 290: 276: 268: 246: 236: 228: 223: 204: 194: 191:bot operator 157: 139: 129: 115: 112: 86: 47: 43: 42: 15: 1737:voting page 1324:to ulner... 1239:to ulner... 1190:to ulner... 1171:to ulner... 1139:to ulner... 1107:to ulner... 1070:to ulner... 1050:—Preceding 889:Concerning 840:the top of 668:—Preceding 643:—Preceding 568:bottom line 287:Hammer Time 277:Darth Mike 208:Bruno Masse 183:Piece of me 172:Piece of me 164:Piece of me 146:Piece of me 19:—Preceding 1721:topic bans 1648:topic bans 1593:. Thanks, 1534:topic bans 765:Rex Sueciæ 712:tycker om 616:Skier Dude 198:CSDWarnBot 89:Wikipedian 67:Help pages 1717:site bans 1644:site bans 1577:Read the 1530:site bans 1408:WillliamG 1347:WillliamG 1204:WillliamG 1177:WillliamG 1152:WillliamG 1120:WillliamG 949:Regards, 891:this edit 702:någonting 250:NetHunter 133:James pic 91:! Please 1767:#Banking 1416:contribs 1404:unsigned 1379:tag. -- 1355:contribs 1343:unsigned 1261:contribs 1253:WilliamG 1249:unsigned 1212:contribs 1200:unsigned 1160:contribs 1148:unsigned 1128:contribs 1116:unsigned 1096:contribs 1084:unsigned 1052:unsigned 682:contribs 670:unsigned 657:contribs 645:unsigned 101:Melchoir 72:Tutorial 44:Welcome! 33:contribs 21:unsigned 1595:DPL bot 1088:Yohiarr 869:General 809:notable 472:index). 50:welcome 1771:Fintor 1520:. The 1495:Pol098 1286:NASDAQ 1276:WP:COI 875:Cheese 862:userfy 853:speedy 832:hangon 817:verify 722:GENAST 337:...etc 212:Lkeryl 187:WP:WMD 1448:Ulner 1369:WP:RS 1311:Ulner 1225:Ulner 1076:sells 1033:Ulner 815:that 706:exakt 589:Ulner 549:Ulner 505:Ulner 464:Next 409:Ulner 395:Ulner 363:Ulner 118:Mytg8 1775:talk 1746:talk 1707:The 1673:talk 1634:The 1599:talk 1573:Bond 1554:talk 1499:talk 1476:talk 1452:talk 1437:talk 1412:talk 1385:talk 1377:that 1351:talk 1315:talk 1300:talk 1257:talk 1229:talk 1208:talk 1181:talk 1156:talk 1124:talk 1092:talk 1060:talk 1037:talk 1013:talk 993:talk 974:talk 955:talk 899:talk 732:nu! 708:vad 696:och 678:talk 653:talk 622:talk 593:talk 576:talk 553:talk 530:talk 509:talk 485:talk 436:your 413:talk 399:talk 367:talk 352:talk 254:talk 216:talk 29:talk 1579:FAQ 1514:Hi, 838:to 823:. 754:, 730:här 714:ert 710:jag 264:ANI 1777:) 1748:) 1740:. 1719:, 1675:) 1667:. 1646:, 1601:) 1556:) 1532:, 1501:) 1478:) 1454:) 1439:) 1418:) 1414:• 1387:) 1357:) 1353:• 1302:) 1263:) 1259:• 1231:) 1214:) 1210:• 1183:) 1162:) 1158:• 1130:) 1126:• 1098:) 1094:• 1062:) 1039:) 1015:) 995:) 976:) 957:) 901:) 835:}} 829:{{ 759:is 751:, 748:, 745:, 742:, 739:, 684:) 680:• 659:) 655:• 625:) 595:) 578:) 555:) 532:) 511:) 487:) 415:) 401:) 369:) 354:) 256:) 248:-- 233:Hi 218:) 35:) 31:• 1773:( 1744:( 1671:( 1597:( 1585:. 1552:( 1497:( 1474:( 1450:( 1435:( 1410:( 1383:( 1349:( 1313:( 1298:( 1255:( 1227:( 1206:( 1179:( 1154:( 1122:( 1090:( 1058:( 1035:( 1011:( 991:( 972:( 953:( 897:( 768:✎ 676:( 651:( 619:( 591:( 574:( 551:( 528:( 507:( 483:( 411:( 397:( 365:( 350:( 252:( 214:( 27:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.