User talk:Umair Aj - Knowledge (XXG)

1228: 1295: 1360: 1100: 834: 910:

share of the blame, then refuse to discuss, and instead make ad hominem attacks, and still expect to have your edits stick. So either participate in the talk page discussion, or accept that your edits will be reverted, whichever you prefer. I will block you from editing for a week if you revert that article again without making a good faith effort to discuss first. --

1435: 176: 104: 1189:

Ok - the other editor now has a short block for continuing to edit war after a final warning and the deletion request was quickly closed. What you should learn from this is to remain calm in future, don't get drawn into edit wars, and have patience that, even though things don't get instantly solved

561:

My salaams to you brother Umair Aj, We both may be equal admirers of Zubaida Khanum and also her fans. My intention in editing the article was to add some more useful info to it. Hope you did not take it personally, if you have been editing Zubaida Khanum a lot in the past. I am 70 years old and was

904:

I am not belittling you; indeed, it looks like you're attempting to belittle me with "my dear", although I wonder if this is a language issue, and you misunderstand what "Oh dear" means. It is an expression of surprise, like "Wow" or "Oh my", it is not a form of "my dear", which used the way you

909:

demeaning. Anyway, if you really don't want to be dragged into this issue any more, that's fine, but then DanJazzy will probably revert your changes. Is that what you mean? You can't impose your preference thru edit warring, accuse the other editor of edit warring without acknowledging your own

650:

team is working on new tools that we hope will be useful to people engaged in reviewing recent changes, fighting vandalism or supporting new users. We want to test them for usability with editors who are experienced with relevant wiki work. If you’re interested in helping to shape this new

1112:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

1372:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

578:'s name got deleted by me but my intention was not to offend anyone. Let's work with each other and not be so quick to revert each other's work. Instead, let's communicate with each other because all of us are trying to make Pakistani articles better on Knowledge (XXG). On 986:. I just wanted to check that you understand that we add references to support the actual article content, not just something of general relevance. References are to provide the reader a way to verify content - they aren't just "general interest" links. See 956:, a copyright web page. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — 846:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

726:? By reverting, you have removed several of my references and cross-verified information collated from authentic resources. Besides, you have also contributed to mismatching birthdays in the background information, which I had corrected in my edits. 258:

should be made right next to the fact. Giving a bunch of sources for a bunch of facts is much worse than sourcing each fact specifically. The only place where this is not necessary is where a single source can verify an entire paragraph, not the case

765:

In an interview with Dawn in February this year, the singer had clarified that his date of birth mentioned on various websites — Sept 17, 1950 — was incorrect, saying he was born on April 14, 1955 in Ransonabad village, Sahiwal

1400: 1140: 874: 797:

Also I noticed that the time of death (8:30pm) you added is not cited. The sole reference to samaa.tv does not mention any such time. Does not it invalidate the "verified resource" policy of Knowledge (XXG)?

342:

I agree it is much clearer now. I still wish we had more reliable sources in this article. While I come from a different culture and never heard of him, the person seems deserving of a better article.--

1384:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1124:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 858:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 582:

article, I had removed a couple of the 'dead links' that I saw. I edit Knowledge (XXG) as a hobby. I would never intentionally vandalize Knowledge (XXG) !!! Best Regards....Nisar Ahmad Grewal

358:

I am greatful that you have helped me a lot. You are right this singer deserves a lot more and I will keep trying to improve this article. I hope you will keep helping me in future also.

562:

living in Pakistani Punjab (Faisalabad) at the time, when Zubaida Khanum's career was at its peak. Surely my generation people know that she sang many super-hit Punjabi duet songs with

654:

The testing should take about an hour, will be conducted online, and will take place during the next few weeks. To participate, please email dchenwikimedia.org with the subject line

1268:

It was a difficult job as the disruptive editor was leaving no stone unturned and trying to damage the article but with the help of administrators, he temporarily got blocked.-

791:

However, your attribution to the statement "Mohammad Rafi and Saleem Raza as the main inspirations" to me is incorrect. There are no such lines as per my last edit:

1025:

No inconvenience. Sourcing of content is one of the most important aspects of any article, so I just wanted to make sure there were no misunderstandings. Thanks. --

302:. A self published blog is not considered a reliable source. Please peruse the above linked guideline. Also, in the same edit, you replaced a maintenance template, 1454: 78: 140:

thank you very much for uprising me but flag icon has a fair usage on the wikipedia so I am reverting your edit. I hope you will keep co-operating like this.

97:

i read the article and the discussions in detail, and im really looking forward to further additions and information Umair, specially about my favorite song

1067: 616: 531: 486: 441: 396: 221:

Blogs, forums, wikis and every other self-published material is not considered reliable, please don't use it in citations. Please also note the following.

84: 179:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article

1480: 1063: 612: 527: 482: 437: 392: 111:

that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Using different styles throughout the encyclopedia, as you did in

43: 1414: 1154: 888: 693:(e.g., reviewing recent changes, reviewing with a particular focus (specify), anti-vandalism, new-page review, welcoming new users, etc.) 813: 744: 29: 73: 1410: 1150: 884: 1393: 1133: 1060:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 867: 978:

Hi. I just reverted a couple of your edits which added inline references that didn't seem related to the article content, at

609:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 524:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 479:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 434:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 389:. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. 1476: 64: 327:

Thanks once again. Your guidline is uprising me on the subject. This time I have changed the statement in singing career.

184: 1472: 1443: 1405: 1145: 879: 107:

Welcome to Knowledge (XXG). Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, there is a

192: 729:

So please explain what prompted you to revert my changes. Else, please re-revert if you realise the error. Thanks.

1190:

in the way you would like, our processes usually arrive at the right end result even if it takes a little while. --

1044: