Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Utaq

Source 📝

156: 934: 187:. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Knowledge (XXG)’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Knowledge (XXG) administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project. 669: 368: 986: 293: 519:
that you must declare on your Talk page (to see instructions on how to do this please click the link). Please familiarise yourself with these pages before amending the draft. If you feel you can meet these requirements, then please make the necessary amendments before resubmitting the page. It would
270:
Secondly, I was thinking of restoring the page to before he changed. Would it come under disruption? The reason I want to revert his edits is because he is plain wrong, I have researched NIAC, the previous content is factually accurate, and also based on reliable sources like politico. Kindly, guide
263:, I was unaware of it. By the way, User:Dariushsaf21 restored his edits before I could reply on the talk page, and before you left him the message on his talk page. I don't have any evidence, but I have an hunch that there is a 622: 218:
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics
227: 1014: 620:! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 719: 421: 765: 743:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
566: 544:
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit
267:, with that user. I know, I should be practicing good faith, but its a hunch that I wanted to ask about, if we are having such hunch, what should be done about it? 938: 610: 73: 738: 893:. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 836:. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 115:. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 1036: 758: 559: 320: 79: 316: 1043: 726: 389: 730: 675: 656: 374: 355: 297: 38: 961: 942: 912:
policies, if I had I would declare it rather having getting my account suspended. But then again, who would hire a 15 year old? :D
909: 699: 461: 405: 264: 24: 323:
to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you.
785: 711: 706: 586: 511:. The draft does not appear to show that the subject has any notability beyond the average coverage for similar academics (see 477: 412: 380: 300:
several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the
68: 636:, a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 715: 486: 536:, exactly which criteria you believe the page meets (eg "I think the page now meets WP:NPROF criteria #3, because XXXXX"). 59: 797: 734: 693: 495: 467: 399: 999: 994: 1032: 424:
when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).
875: 867: 950: 1025: 1018: 1004: 722:
when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Knowledge (XXG).
301: 890: 833: 112: 818: 810: 751: 660: 101: 93: 681: 678:
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:
552: 359: 234: 377:
has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Cabrils was:
312: 223: 49: 632: 64: 946: 521: 437: 525: 441: 168: 338:
Thank you once again for your guidance. I will keep it in mind, and will follow it. Thank you.
800: 714:). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see 641: 596: 539: 45: 512: 886:. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. 829:. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. 516: 508: 490: 433: 108:. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while. 1055: 898: 841: 737:. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid 328: 308: 249: 120: 1042:
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Knowledge (XXG)'s
538:
Once you have implemented these suggestions, you may also wish to leave a note for me on
757:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
558:
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
529: 515:). Also, if you have any connection to the subject, including being paid, you have a 446:
As you may know, Knowledge (XXG)'s basic requirement for entry is that the subject is
420:
Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about
155: 493:. Please note that many of the references are not from sources that are considered 792: 637: 592: 230:. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the 609: 960:
Not to be offensive, however, this is laughable. As mentioned before, I have no
878:. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because 821:. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because 183:
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as
104:. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because 668: 367: 296:
Hi Utaq! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of
1051: 894: 837: 324: 260: 245: 131: 116: 965: 913: 852: 339: 272: 134: 20: 985: 211:
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
482: 1009: 292: 532:
of the subject. It would also be helpful if you could please identify
630:
questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
964:, if I had I would have declared it, as it would have been easier. 1031:, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be 507:. Additionally, the draft tends to read too much like a CV, which 499:
for establishing notability. The draft requires reliable sources
1059: 973: 954: 921: 902: 860: 845: 804: 645: 600: 481:. To properly create such a draft page, please see the articles 347: 332: 307:
All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article
280: 253: 142: 124: 1046:, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: 750:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
551:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
786:
Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors
587:
Knowledge (XXG)'s real-time chat help from experienced editors
15: 768:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
569:
associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the
984: 667: 366: 304:
disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.
688:
coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in
680:
This submission's references do not show that the subject
1015:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/EuphonyRandolph
172:. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and 945:
incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
778: 770: 579: 571: 432:
potentially meet the relevant requirements (including
416:
of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
928:
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
754:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
555:
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
379:
This draft's references do not show that the subject
764:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
565:
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any
520:
help our volunteer reviewers by identifying, on the
727:
the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article
226:or you may learn more about this contentious topic 205:
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
725:This submission does not appear to be written in 198:, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and: 178:imply that there are any issues with your editing 939:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 908:Thank you for your comment. I do understand the 27:, where you can send them messages and comments. 444:) but presently it is not clear that it does. 208:follow editorial and behavioural best practice; 190:Within contentious topics, editors should edit 456:if they have received significant coverage in 880:it needs more sources to establish notability 823:it needs more sources to establish notability 106:it needs more sources to establish notability 8: 884:you may have a possible Conflict of Interest 851:Thank you for your comment. Same as below. 827:you may have a possible Conflict of Interest 162:You have recently edited a page related to 202:adhere to the purposes of Knowledge (XXG); 1048:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} 735:independent, reliable, published sources 428:Well done on creating the draft, and it 682:qualifies for a Knowledge (XXG) article 381:qualifies for a Knowledge (XXG) article 712:guidelines on the notability of people 317:Talk:National Iranian American Council 7: 452:. Essentially subjects are presumed 937:There is currently a discussion at 729:. Entries should be written from a 426:The comment the reviewer left was: 1017:. Note that multiple accounts are 674:Your recent article submission to 491:‘Easier Referencing for Beginners’ 373:Your recent article submission to 149:Introduction to contentious topics 14: 874:Thanks for your contributions to 817:Thanks for your contributions to 733:, and should refer to a range of 542:and I would be happy to reassess. 383:. In summary, the draft needs to 298:National Iranian American Council 271:me in these regard. Thank you. 100:Thanks for your contributions to 44:New to Knowledge (XXG)? Welcome! 932: 608: 390:eight academic-specific criteria 315:. If you are unable to agree at 291: 154: 39:Click here to start a new topic. 889:Please see more information at 832:Please see more information at 772:Articles for creation help desk 623:Articles for creation help desk 573:Articles for creation help desk 224:arbitration clerks' noticeboard 214:refrain from gaming the system. 111:Please see more information at 1013:per the evidence presented at 1: 745:after they have been resolved 546:after they have been resolved 36:Put new text under old text. 528:best sources that establish 1060:21:34, 12 August 2024 (UTC) 684:—that is, they do not show 487:‘Referencing for Beginners’ 1076: 974:01:13, 9 August 2024 (UTC) 955:17:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC) 478:independent of the subject 473:intellectually independent 321:dispute resolution options 164:post-1978 Iranian politics 1044:guide to appealing blocks 1005:abusing multiple accounts 922:21:00, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 903:15:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 861:21:01, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 846:15:44, 29 July 2024 (UTC) 805:15:04, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 741:that promote the subject. 646:04:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 601:04:55, 26 July 2024 (UTC) 348:22:56, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 333:20:41, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 281:19:24, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 254:18:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 143:18:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 125:17:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC) 74:Be welcoming to newcomers 969: 917: 891:Help:Unreviewed new page 856: 834:Help:Unreviewed new page 710:of the subject (see the 343: 319:, please use one of the 276: 222:you may ask them at the 166:, a topic designated as 138: 113:Help:Unreviewed new page 980:Blocked as a sockpuppet 876:Pierluigi Rossi Ferrini 868:Pierluigi Rossi Ferrini 989: 752:Draft:K. Donnell Smith 672: 509:Knowledge (XXG) is not 371: 69:avoid personal attacks 988: 941:regarding a possible 731:neutral point of view 676:Articles for Creation 671: 657:Articles for creation 375:Articles for Creation 370: 356:Articles for creation 1010:User:EuphonyRandolph 943:conflict of interest 780:reviewer's talk page 581:reviewer's talk page 553:Draft:Om Kumar Harsh 517:conflict of interest 483:‘Your First Article’ 1007:as a sockpuppet of 870:moved to draftspace 813:moved to draftspace 655:Your submission at 475:of each other, and 354:Your submission at 302:edit warring policy 96:moved to draftspace 990: 673: 626:. If you have any 498: 480: 470: 464: 458:multiple published 372: 197: 193: 185:contentious topics 177: 80:dispute resolution 41: 1003:from editing for 819:Robert J. Koester 811:Robert J. Koester 803: 766:untoward behavior 720:mistakes to avoid 704:sources that are 652: 651: 567:untoward behavior 522:draft's talk page 494: 476: 466: 462:secondary sources 460: 422:mistakes to avoid 195: 191: 175: 90: 89: 60:Assume good faith 37: 1067: 1049: 1012: 936: 935: 796: 783: 775: 718:and learn about 661:K. Donnell Smith 612: 605: 604: 584: 576: 534:with specificity 387:meet any of the 311:to try to reach 295: 239: 233: 158: 102:Peter Erich Voss 94:Peter Erich Voss 16: 1075: 1074: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1063: 1062: 1047: 1040: 1008: 982: 947:Helpful Raccoon 933: 930: 872: 815: 807: 777: 769: 742: 723: 665: 648: 603: 578: 570: 543: 425: 364: 289: 243: 242: 237: 231: 159: 151: 130:Ok. Thank you @ 98: 86: 85: 55: 12: 11: 5: 1073: 1071: 1041: 992:You have been 991: 983: 981: 978: 977: 976: 929: 926: 925: 924: 871: 865: 864: 863: 814: 808: 790: 789: 762: 759:may be deleted 755: 724: 716:technical help 679: 666: 664: 653: 650: 649: 615: 613: 591: 590: 563: 560:may be deleted 556: 427: 419: 418: 417: 398:cite multiple 393: 384: 378: 365: 363: 360:Om Kumar Harsh 352: 351: 350: 288: 285: 284: 283: 268: 216: 215: 212: 209: 206: 203: 196:constructively 179: 160: 153: 152: 150: 147: 146: 145: 97: 91: 88: 87: 84: 83: 76: 71: 62: 56: 54: 53: 42: 33: 32: 29: 28: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1072: 1061: 1057: 1053: 1045: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1028: 1027: 1020: 1016: 1011: 1006: 1002: 1001: 997: 996: 987: 979: 975: 971: 967: 963: 959: 958: 957: 956: 952: 948: 944: 940: 927: 923: 919: 915: 911: 907: 906: 905: 904: 900: 896: 892: 887: 885: 881: 877: 869: 866: 862: 858: 854: 850: 849: 848: 847: 843: 839: 835: 830: 828: 824: 820: 812: 809: 806: 802: 799: 798:contributions 795: 794: 787: 782: 781: 774: 773: 767: 763: 760: 756: 753: 749: 748: 746: 740: 739:peacock terms 736: 732: 728: 721: 717: 713: 709: 708: 703: 702: 697: 696: 691: 687: 683: 677: 670: 662: 658: 654: 647: 643: 639: 635: 634: 629: 625: 624: 619: 614: 611: 607: 606: 602: 598: 594: 588: 583: 582: 575: 574: 568: 564: 561: 557: 554: 550: 549: 547: 541: 537: 535: 531: 527: 523: 518: 514: 510: 506: 502: 497: 492: 488: 484: 479: 474: 469: 463: 459: 455: 451: 450: 443: 439: 435: 431: 423: 415: 414: 409: 408: 403: 402: 397: 394: 392: 391: 386: 385: 382: 376: 369: 361: 357: 353: 349: 345: 341: 337: 336: 335: 334: 330: 326: 322: 318: 314: 310: 305: 303: 299: 294: 286: 282: 278: 274: 269: 266: 262: 258: 257: 256: 255: 251: 247: 241: 236: 235:Ctopics/aware 229: 225: 221: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 200: 199: 188: 186: 181: 173: 171: 170: 165: 157: 148: 144: 140: 136: 133: 129: 128: 127: 126: 122: 118: 114: 109: 107: 103: 95: 92: 81: 77: 75: 72: 70: 66: 63: 61: 58: 57: 51: 47: 46:Learn to edit 43: 40: 35: 34: 31: 30: 26: 22: 18: 17: 1026:illegitimate 1024: 1022: 1000:indefinitely 998: 993: 931: 888: 883: 879: 873: 831: 826: 822: 816: 791: 779: 771: 744: 705: 700: 694: 689: 685: 631: 627: 621: 617: 580: 572: 545: 540:my talk page 533: 504: 500: 472: 457: 453: 448: 447: 445: 429: 411: 406: 400: 395: 388: 306: 290: 244: 219: 217: 189: 184: 182: 167: 163: 161: 110: 105: 99: 707:independent 686:significant 501:about Harsh 413:independent 259:Thank you @ 240:template. 169:contentious 530:notability 309:talk pages 220:procedures 776:, on the 701:secondary 690:published 663:(July 26) 577:, on the 465:that are 438:WP:ANYBIO 407:secondary 362:(July 26) 313:consensus 287:July 2024 192:carefully 82:if needed 65:Be polite 25:talk page 1033:reverted 1023:not for 695:reliable 633:Teahouse 526:WP:THREE 505:by Harsh 496:reliable 468:reliable 442:WP:NPROF 410:sources 401:reliable 50:get help 19:This is 1037:deleted 1029:reasons 1019:allowed 995:blocked 793:bonadea 784:or use 638:Cabrils 616:Hello, 593:Cabrils 585:or use 513:WP:ROTM 454:notable 449:notable 1021:, but 524:, the 434:WP:GNG 1052:Bbb23 895:S0091 838:S0091 628:other 325:S0091 261:S0091 246:S0091 174:does 132:S0091 117:S0091 78:Seek 1056:talk 1039:. 970:talk 966:Utaq 951:talk 918:talk 914:Utaq 899:talk 882:and 857:talk 853:Utaq 842:talk 825:and 801:talk 642:talk 618:Utaq 597:talk 503:not 489:and 344:talk 340:Utaq 329:talk 277:talk 273:Utaq 250:talk 228:here 194:and 139:talk 135:Utaq 121:talk 67:and 21:Utaq 1050:. 1035:or 962:COI 910:COI 430:may 265:COI 176:not 23:'s 1058:) 972:) 953:) 920:) 901:) 859:) 844:) 747:. 698:, 692:, 659:: 644:) 599:) 548:. 485:, 471:, 440:, 436:, 404:, 396:or 358:: 346:) 331:) 279:) 252:) 238:}} 232:{{ 180:. 141:) 123:) 48:; 1054:( 968:( 949:( 916:( 897:( 855:( 840:( 788:. 761:. 640:( 595:( 589:. 562:. 342:( 327:( 275:( 248:( 137:( 119:( 52:.

Index

Utaq
talk page
Click here to start a new topic.
Learn to edit
get help
Assume good faith
Be polite
avoid personal attacks
Be welcoming to newcomers
dispute resolution
Peter Erich Voss
Peter Erich Voss
Help:Unreviewed new page
S0091
talk
17:00, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
S0091
Utaq
talk
18:12, 25 July 2024 (UTC)

contentious
arbitration clerks' noticeboard
here
Ctopics/aware
S0091
talk
18:46, 25 July 2024 (UTC)
S0091
COI

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.