1282:, my addition was removed due to lack of notability of Zenfolio. I went back and forth trying to support the notability, and finally, the person who removed it, added it back after he did his own research. I was also told that there should be an article before the company is added to that list, so I started an article based on that direction. Having never created an article before, I used the article of another site on that same list as a template and modified it with Zenfolio data. Since I'm more comfortable editing existing articles than creating new ones, my goal was to create a basic one with limited information at first, and then add more using edits I'm more familiar with later. My article was declined based on notability and references, so I started adding citations. As I stated somewhere, I don't want the article to simply be a big list of citations. It seems like one good one should be sufficient to establish notability (which has been established a separate way in the list article as well). I have dozens of citations at hand, which I'm just waiting to start amending to the article. So it's frustrating to find the article simply deleted. I am not, nor have I have I ever been, an employee of Zenfolio. I have nothing to gain by advertising for them. Thank you for your assistance.
1405:
start somewhere, right? At this point, can I let you decide what is best to do in this case? If so, I'll follow your lead. One idea would be to restore things to the way they were when the article was rejected the last time but still existed. That way, it would be available for improving. If it would be better to start from scratch, I guess I'm OK with that, too, but I don't want to go down this same road again, so I'd like to know what I could do differently to keep that from happening. By the way, I never saw the deletion discussion (far less participated in it), so I don't know what was said there. It never dawned on me that there would even be one, since that presumed the article had to first be created, which last I checked hadn't happened.
467:
impact than doing a side by side comparison as you suggested. Someone can look at the various areas of the image and see exactly where the changes were made with an animation. This is much more difficult and less noticeable with a side by side illustration. To completely disregard the benefits of web media for the sake of deferring to "old" media is, in my opinion, to try to grandfather the need for buggy whips when the automobile has clearly made the need for buggies obsolete.
1245:
different article. The article apparently was deleted before I could correct the article. The person asking me to correct the article did not instruct me on how to correct it despite repeated requests. I consider this an abuse of power, and I expect an apology and assistance in moving forward with the article. I have spent time on this article, and that time is valuable to me. So simply throwing it out without giving me the chance to correct it is like stealing my time.
1096:
763:
1762:
1689:
1616:
1540:
980:
though. It is just as notable a site as
Zenfolio. The only reason Zenfolio is not as notable as pbase is that it is not as old. In my opinion, Zenfolio is more notable than the vast majority of sites listed there for professional photographers. Perhaps the list is intended to be a list of free photo sharing sites for amateurs? In that case, Zenfolio doesn't qualify, but only because it's not free.
1032:
868:
1149:
960:. None of the sources currently in the article at AfC appear to simultaneously meet the significant coverage and reliable source clauses of the GNG. The previous deletion of this article due to notability probably is getting it more attention from me than the other sites on the list; if you think some should not be there feel free to bring them up for discussion or
222:, as like the paragraph I suggested needed written more carefully, I found the whole section was poorly self-integrated for the lay person. In general, I'd extend that comment to the next section on both articles. In any event, I abhor 'IN-YOUR-FACE' templates as a rule, but when time (or knowledge) limitations press in this
431:
However, animations are also annoying to many people, and I think in this context having two separate pictures side-by-side would be more appropriate. The animation would be completely lost to anyone reading through quickly, having a browser with animation turned off, or for a printed version of the article.
1404:
Thanks for the reply. At this point, everything is in such a mess that I don't know what the best approach is. I do think it's important that the article be created, and I will do my part to help craft it. The state I last left it was never intended to be a final and complete article, but you need to
1370:
Right, that is the page I was looking at when I added the help me tag, as suggested on that page. What confuses me is how the article could have been set up for speedy deletion when as far as I knew, it hadn't even yet been approved as an article in the first place. The last I knew, I had resubmitted
1385:
I believe it was moved into article space by an
Articles for Creation volunteer, then subsequently deleted. This obviously represents a bit of a disconnect between AfC and the deleting admin; there may be an opportunity here to improve coordination between AfC and New Page Patrol/practice for speedy
671:
Actually, what I said was that an eclipse has a 65% chance of being preceded OR followed by another eclipse. That chance that an eclipse is followed by another eclipse one octaeteris later is about half that. I don't know if it's significant to re-add or not. I'll leave that up to more knowledgeable
356:
page, which that editor has to resolve manually. My edit (immediately following yours in space, but preceding it in time) was an edit conflict, and I thought that perhaps I had inadvertantly wiped out your edit in resolving the conflict. When I saw that it wasn't so, I looked further. I have seen
338:
I am puzzled, too. I only added that remark after I verified that my change was edited out (by the change currently after it). It appeared both in the current view and the history view. Like you, I now can see no evidence of my ever having made such a change. Have I accidentally run into a wiki bug?
1192:
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can
979:
This is absurd. Is a PC World review not relevant? PC World is a long term relevant publication both on the web and in print. I should remove other sites from a list because you are nitpicking
Zenfolio? Using your same criteria, pbase should be deleted. I certainly don't think it should be deleted,
793:
strong in science as well as verbal. Same with ACT and SAT tests, relatively weak in math very strong in science and verbal. So math is my "weakest link", the hardest thing (relatively again) for my brain to do, although their are other aspects my mind is weaker at still that fall under the concept
494:
In this instance, I think a mouseover action would be far more effective. I have no idea how to do that on wikipedia, however. By the way, I think the animation of the River tree thirds also suffers the same problem as the image I removed. However, in the case of the
Digital photography article, in
262:
Now being a new editor, note that it's preferable to do a complete edit, but if you can't, it's important to state what you percieve is wrong, and if possible (like points 1 & 2) suggest what may be a corrective measure. People edit in an area to which they tend to specialize. Most articles are
430:
I undid your edit to the digital photography article. I don't think the edit substantially improved the article. Furthermore, the illustration was an animated GIF. GIF images are not appropriate for photographs because of quantization issues. I realize GIF was used to do get the animation to work.
247:
As far as that goes, "full moon cycle" would be equivalent to "new moon cycle". Well, at least they have the same period. The details of the variation would differ. For example, the maximum interval between new moons is not the same as the maximum interval between full moons even though their mean
466:
I also believe the very nature of animated web media lends itself to more advantages than disadvantages. We are using browsers on electronic machines, not pen an paper or books to view the web, thus the media is different. I also think seeing the dramatic differences in such an image has more
379:
Perhaps. In any case, I wasn't particularly worried about it. In the worst case scenario, it would have been an illustration for the subject the commentary was about. For what it's worth, I thought you said much more eloquently essentially what I was trying to say. Perhaps I shouldn't have said
278:
I was at work at the time and didn't have the time. My decision to contact you directly was to point out something that I perceived was a sloppy edit by you that you may have been unaware of. I tried contacting you in as private a way as I could identify. Consider my comment to you to have been
1244:
This has been an immensely frustration process for me. I'm trying to contribute to wikipedia, but at each step, I seem to be stepped on by people with more power than courtesy. The latest instance involves the apparent deletion of the article I was asked to create in order to add an entry to a
651:
It has 8.434 eclipse years. Would that not make it fail as an eclipse cycle? I could see the possibility of an eclipse occurring on
Octaeteris after another, but than that's it, no more. So the significance seems to be this, based on your data, after an eclipse there is a 65% chance of another
789:
scientific concepts that require little to no math skill at all, but it helps (I sometimes wonder if opponents to evolution are merely incapable of imagining large numbers, like 4 billion years). In my case I was tested by a professional for various aptitudes, I'm relatively weak in math and
788:
Interesting! I think totally the opposite, the two overlap but I don't think understanding math is necessary to understanding science. Yes, they are very complimentary, if I wanted to do a my own science experiment I'm going to possibly need to polish up my math skills, but there are so many
1041:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
877:. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.
286:
If you have the time to work on the article flow and present the dates, do so. No one owns any article on wp, and the troubles follow if and only if one begins to feel possessive of them. In the meantime, I'll leave you a welcome message above, which has some useful links. Best regards //
263:
patrolled or watched by people making a contribution on them, but that doesn't mean a wandering editor has no place or valid view point. Some matters, especially technical ones like this can benefit from a view from another's shoes. The idea is to work together, and minimize friction (See
408:) 19:39, 26 December 2006 (UTC)" does not appear in the current version. I did not delete it. In fact, I want to pains to ensure it remained, since it was not my comment, and it included your sig. I thought I'd better post this, so you knew there was no intention on my part to delete it.
1701:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before
Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1774:
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before
Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
113:"Full moon cycle" or "moon cycle" would be good names. But "fumocy" is not (yet at least) a widely-accepted term for this; thus it cannot be used as an article title or linked to (but it could be mentioned as a proposed name of the concept). The article was not deleted; It's right
1371:
the article after addressing specific issues that were pointed out, and I was waiting for feedback to see if I had addressed them completely. If not, the appropriate thing to do would have been to address those issues, not to delete the not-quite-yet-an-article.
149:
Since this is my own talk page (thanks for setting it up), I'll experiment here with editing. I know there's a sandbox -- I just haven't played in it enough. The dates I was referring to were, e.g., changing "2000-01-01 00:00:00" to "two thousandths (2000
1427:; instead adding a couple others including the PC World article that you mentioned. Let me know what you think, and if you have any other similar sources, adding them would be helpful. When this article is ready for review, a request should be started at
399:
There seems to have been an additional problem. Your comment, "Yes, there are some articles that are infested by POV-warriors who keep down reasonable edits, but they are outnumbered by the articles that are guarded by knowledgable, responsible editors.
1628:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1552:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before
Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
656:. That does not seem to me to qualify as an eclipse cycle. A predictor? Yes. A reliable one? No. At least a fortnight guarantees an eclipse 100% of the time. :) Do you think it's still significant enough to maybe add it as a note in the article? --
204:
I didn't think of it as a completed edit. I did, however, think you thought it an improvement, else why do the edit at all. I thought the article was much harder to read after the edit than before. I would have reverted it, had I known how to do
1205:
1199:
to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with
189:
Doesn't hypertext do that automatically? It seems to me that it's possible to define terms to excess. If the intended publication were print, I might have a different opinion, but wikipedia is intended for browser use, as far as I
951:
need to be addressed before it is added to the list. Writing the article about the subject before adding it to lists is pretty standard practice, and unfortunately I am not convinced that this website meets the criteria at
1181:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read
322:
with the edit comment, "Restoring wholesale deletion of my comment." I looked at the history/diffs, and it does not look like your remarks were previously added, so I am puzzled what you mean by "Wholesale deletion."
1802:
1729:
1656:
1580:
168:
It seems to me being linked as an abbreviation is sufficient. If you're not familiar with the concept, simply follow the link, conveniently located at the appropriate spot, and read up. That's the whole beauty of
1495:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
532:
require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
512:
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
1786:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1713:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1640:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1564:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose
1352:. Recreations of the article will probably be deleted without going through that step. They (Del Review watchers) will also be able to give very specific feedback for the article's restoration.
441:
Thank you for your memo. Most editors don't bother to do such. And I understand the various arguments against animated gifs, but I've seen it used in many other articles here on
Knowledge (XXG).
1058:
894:
1449:
Thank you. I haven't taken a look yet, since I've been very busy at work. As it happens, today was my last day at work, so I'll have time presently to take a closer look.
541:
1278:
First, let me say that although I've edited a number of articles, this is the first one I've created from scratch. I created it because when I added Zenfolio to
694:
another eclipse. I think that's pretty much the nail in the coffin. Do you mind if I add a summary of our discussions to the eclipse cycle talk page? Thanks. --
927:
Depending on your browser, you should have a basic set of citation tools at the top right edge of the text editor window, which are discussed a little bit at
1345:
690:
OK. That makes more sense to me, given the deviation from the half-integer eclipse year. So there is a 33% chance that an eclipse would be followed by
154:) very first second". Was that supposed to be easier to understand? It actually took me several readings before I understood what you were trying to do.
133:
Typos and misspellings are a likely thing. You probably shouldn't make a practice of throwing minor mistakes like that in peoples faces, just fix them.
35:
1390:? If not, I might run with trying to bring up the more general AfC/NPP coordination issue. In any case, I apologize for my part in your frustration.
1138:
352:
If both editors make identical edits (as in two reverts of the same vandalism), one will be ignored; otherwise, the second one to save should get an
69:
1322:
I couldn't figure out what to do. It turned out the form I needed to enter the article name in was so prominent I didn't see it. How embarrassing.
1113:
259:. Note I also stated a three-point set of deficiencies, but also that only the third was 'Real important', the other two are matters of taste.
536:
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of
544:
will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
1816:
1743:
1670:
1520:
844:, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day.
1048:
884:
841:
944:
161:
so far as I can see on a re-read, as intended, I introduced the concept of Terrestrial time, which was only linked as an abbreviation,
30:
516:
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
89:! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the
849:
932:
45:
and your question on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
1812:
1739:
1666:
1516:
1795:
1722:
1649:
1573:
1158:
74:
54:
26:
1279:
773:
Interesting. It almost seems like an oxymoron to be a science natural and hate math. In my mind, the two are inseparable.
1201:
473:
64:
1507:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
1349:
357:
odd things happen when there are multiple edit conflicts on a page -- perhaps that is what happened in this instance.
79:
1807:
1734:
1661:
1585:
1512:
845:
267:), not expect everyone to be perfect everytime. It is part of our culture that any non-user page is subject to being
1165:
540:, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then
1420:
837:
353:
1209:
1186:
816:
be roughly equal, no math involved. I'm cheating though because the illustration relies on basic geometry. :) --
94:
49:
574:
and am guessing you must be the same name i recognize from dpreview. Small worlds and all that. Matthew Field.
1783:
1710:
1637:
1561:
86:
836:
Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here:
405:
362:
328:
33:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the
795:
114:
1508:
913:
571:
1450:
1406:
1372:
1323:
1283:
1246:
1009:
981:
774:
717:
673:
632:
590:
496:
432:
409:
381:
340:
59:
446:
233:
Fortunately for you, perhaps, I'm not sure what you mean by 'IN-YOUR-FACE' templates, but I can guess.
178:
Moreover, like the little fixup I did, the paragraph needs to be carefully worded to introduce terms,
1359:
1219:
1126:
1102:
1095:
1076:
517:
1770:
1697:
1624:
1606:
1548:
1530:
1484:
1475:
1195:
812:
E.g. I can draw you an illustration that shows why the number of solar eclipses and lunar eclipses
556:
1779:
1706:
1633:
1557:
1504:
1488:
1319:
1297:
520:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was
458:
767:
401:
358:
324:
293:
126:
103:
537:
1594:
1174:
1142:
948:
821:
803:
739:
699:
661:
621:
482:
380:"Wholesale deletion". That was out of frustration with having lost the changes I'd just made.
1791:
1718:
1645:
1569:
1500:
1492:
1318:
Thanks. Done. Now I know what Userfy means. Also, for some reason, the first time I followed
1182:
961:
928:
90:
1440:
1395:
1305:
1265:
1238:
969:
906:
579:
1794:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1787:
1721:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1714:
1648:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1641:
1572:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1565:
1503:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
1496:
1432:
1428:
1387:
1178:
1038:
1024:
957:
953:
874:
860:
616:
simultaneously. I was lazy and overwrote your edits but they have been restored. Thanks. --
264:
213:
1353:
1213:
1120:
1070:
1062:
898:
118:
1424:
1177:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under
1260:
Was the intention of the article to promote a company? Or was it written in that tone?
731:
552:
548:
339:
What happens if two people make an edit to the same page at the same time, by the way?
256:
197:
Sorry if you thought I in any way thought of that as a completed edit for that section.
39:, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type
1309:
1269:
613:
606:
289:
99:
452:
1590:
817:
799:
735:
695:
657:
617:
1761:
1688:
1615:
1539:
1436:
1391:
1301:
1261:
965:
931:. More information about integrating more advanced text editors can be found at
575:
1031:
867:
240:
Basically, the two articles should share the same text so far as I'm concerned,
653:
1047:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at
883:
If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at
524:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to
219:
1820:
1747:
1674:
1598:
1524:
1458:
1444:
1414:
1399:
1380:
1365:
1331:
1313:
1291:
1273:
1254:
1225:
1132:
1109:
1082:
1017:
989:
973:
915:
853:
825:
807:
782:
743:
725:
703:
681:
665:
640:
625:
598:
583:
560:
547:
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of
499:
485:
435:
412:
384:
366:
343:
332:
298:
108:
1157:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
1054:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
890:
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
1798:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1725:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1652:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1576:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1491:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
508:
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
223:
1423:. I removed the existing secondary sources because they did not meet
716:
Go ahead. P.S. How many occurrences are there in a fortnight cycle?
652:
eclipse (lunar instead of solar and vice versa) occurring exactly
447:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Jupiter_Great_Red_Spot_Animation.gif
320:
Knowledge (XXG):Village pump (policy)#self-appointed gatekeepers
570:
Hey Victor Just noticed your post on a page i was editing about
1801:
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review
1728:
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review
1655:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
1579:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
459:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:AnimECHECS-Le-coup-du-Berger3.gif
1147:
1116:
at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
1094:
1030:
866:
495:
addition, the accompanying text didn't improve the article.
151:
1005:
Curtis Joe Walker, Professional Photographer, January 2010
734:. Love any feedback you might give me on that article. --
1344:
Since this was deleted because of a deletion discussion
1057:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
893:
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the
1782:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1709:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1636:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1560:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
905:
Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG)! -
319:
212:
Refer to the Village Pump (Policy) for other thoughts.
1069:
Thank you for your contributions to Knowledge (XXG)!
453:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Image:Rivertree_thirds_md.gif
589:
There are others with my name, but you are correct.
1049:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Zenfolio
885:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Zenfolio
842:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Articles for creation/Zenfolio
271:. So edit out my misspelling, don't bitch about it.
226:, I will (regretfully) occasionally resort to such.
1386:deletions. Are you planning to submit this one to
947:, my opinion is that the notability concerns with
1483:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
612:Just wanted to let you know we were both editing
1419:I took a first pass at rewriting the article at
1179:section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion
1155:
1101:Hello, Victor Engel. You have new messages at
999:Duncan Grove, Pro Photo Magazine (UK) July 2010
97:or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! //
1435:. I can assist with that when the time comes.
1346:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Zenfolio
307:Thanks for the welcome message. I will use it.
1348:- the first step must be taking the issue to
8:
125:Belated welcome, and Thanks for the note on
1204:. If the page is deleted, you can contact
730:2 or 3. Just part of the (shameless plug)
85:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
1202:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines
1078:ask your question about your article here
472:Thus in this case, I default to the Wiki
1037:Thank you for your recent submission to
873:Thank you for your recent submission to
832:Your article has been moved to AfC space
1159:the guide to writing your first article
218:I did (for me) much worse 'damage' on
117:. Just use the "move page" feature. --
943:To expand a bit on the discussion at
7:
1771:2018 Arbitration Committee elections
1698:2017 Arbitration Committee elections
1625:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
1549:2016 Arbitration Committee elections
964:remove them yourself. Kind regards!
1784:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1768:Hello, Victor Engel. Voting in the
1711:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1695:Hello, Victor Engel. Voting in the
1638:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1622:Hello, Victor Engel. Voting in the
1562:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process
1546:Hello, Victor Engel. Voting in the
1212:the page or email a copy to you.
1164:You may want to consider using the
1002:George Schaub, Shutterbug July 2010
945:Talk:List of photo sharing websites
933:Knowledge (XXG):Text editor support
50:The Five Pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1755:ArbCom 2018 election voter message
1682:ArbCom 2017 election voter message
1208:to request that the administrator
994:Maybe you need more print sources?
29:to Knowledge (XXG). Thank you for
14:
1509:review the candidates' statements
1760:
1687:
1614:
1538:
761:
528:in the next few days. This does
1805:and submit your choices on the
1732:and submit your choices on the
1350:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
647:The Problem with the Octaeteris
426:Digital Photography edit undone
1515:. For the Election committee,
1485:Arbitration Committee election
1476:ArbCom elections are now open!
1280:List of photo sharing websites
1:
1821:18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
1675:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1599:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
1525:08:51, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
1431:to avoid speedy deletion per
1196:the page's talk page directly
413:00:33, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
385:23:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
367:22:21, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
344:22:10, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
333:20:23, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
299:02:44, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
109:02:45, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
1748:18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
1187:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Business
1168:to help you create articles.
692:an eclipse of opposite type
631:Thanks for letting me know.
279:terse, but not rude, please.
70:How to write a great article
1659:and submit your choices on
1583:and submit your choices on
1511:and submit your choices on
1206:one of these administrators
500:05:58, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
486:03:53, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
436:01:06, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
36:New contributors' help page
1838:
1813:MediaWiki message delivery
1740:MediaWiki message delivery
1667:MediaWiki message delivery
1657:the candidates' statements
1581:the candidates' statements
1517:MediaWiki message delivery
1459:02:45, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
1445:04:33, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1421:User:Victor Engel/Zenfolio
1415:03:39, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1400:01:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1381:20:31, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1366:20:12, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1332:02:07, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
1314:21:33, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
1292:18:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1274:17:55, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1255:16:40, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
1226:11:41, 20 March 2012 (UTC)
1215:Hallows Aktiengesellschaft
1133:21:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
1122:Hallows Aktiengesellschaft
1110:21:11, 19 March 2012 (UTC)
1083:19:22, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
1018:15:12, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
990:14:50, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
974:06:07, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
916:14:00, 10 March 2012 (UTC)
838:User:Victor Engel/Zenfolio
759:
561:21:19, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
255:as I commented plainly on
1231:Zenfolio article deleted?
1173:A tag has been placed on
854:21:32, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
826:20:58, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
808:19:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
783:18:57, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
744:23:20, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
726:23:13, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
704:22:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
682:22:47, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
666:22:03, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
641:19:53, 21 June 2011 (UTC)
626:22:08, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
599:15:37, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
584:04:18, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
121:20:06, 15 Aug 2003 (UTC)
1454:
1410:
1376:
1327:
1300:to try and get it back.
1287:
1250:
1013:
985:
721:
677:
636:
594:
93:, add a question to the
1189:for more information.
248:intervals are the same.
1183:the guidelines on spam
1170:
1152:
1103:Hallows AG's talk page
1099:
1035:
871:
846:ArticlesForCreationBot
318:You added comments to
1780:Arbitration Committee
1707:Arbitration Committee
1634:Arbitration Committee
1607:ArbCom Elections 2016
1558:Arbitration Committee
1531:ArbCom Elections 2016
1489:Arbitration Committee
1151:
1098:
1039:Articles for Creation
1034:
1025:Articles for creation
875:Articles for Creation
870:
861:Articles for creation
654:8 years, 1 day later
518:consensus discussion
1493:arbitration process
1023:Your submission at
859:Your submission at
314:Wholesale deletion?
1796:arbitration policy
1723:arbitration policy
1650:arbitration policy
1609:: Voting now open!
1574:arbitration policy
1533:: Voting now open!
1505:arbitration policy
1153:
1114:remove this notice
1100:
1036:
872:
840:has been moved to
768:Talk:Eclipse cycle
693:
269:edited mercilessly
75:Naming conventions
55:How to edit a page
31:your contributions
923:Editing interface
691:
605:Edit conflict at
224:volunteer service
1829:
1764:
1691:
1618:
1542:
1362:
1356:
1243:
1237:
1222:
1216:
1150:
1129:
1123:
1117:
1079:
1073:
911:
765:
764:
756:Math vs. Science
527:
523:
296:
106:
65:Picture tutorial
60:Editing tutorial
43:
1837:
1836:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1828:
1827:
1826:
1825:
1824:
1765:
1757:
1752:
1751:
1692:
1684:
1679:
1678:
1662:the voting page
1619:
1611:
1603:
1602:
1586:the voting page
1543:
1535:
1513:the voting page
1479:
1429:deletion review
1360:
1354:
1241:
1235:
1233:
1220:
1214:
1171:
1148:
1146:
1139:Speedy deletion
1127:
1121:
1118:
1107:
1092:
1087:
1077:
1071:
1028:
941:
925:
920:
907:
864:
834:
771:
770:
762:
758:
649:
610:
568:
542:this discussion
525:
521:
510:
428:
316:
294:
130:
104:
80:Manual of Style
41:
19:
17:Belated welcome
12:
11:
5:
1835:
1833:
1803:the candidates
1766:
1759:
1758:
1756:
1753:
1730:the candidates
1693:
1686:
1685:
1683:
1680:
1620:
1613:
1612:
1610:
1604:
1544:
1537:
1536:
1534:
1528:
1482:
1478:
1473:
1472:
1471:
1470:
1469:
1468:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1341:
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1310:talk to others
1270:talk to others
1232:
1229:
1166:Article Wizard
1154:
1145:
1141:nomination of
1136:
1108:Message added
1106:
1093:
1091:
1088:
1086:
1085:
1066:
1065:
1055:
1052:
1043:
1029:
1027:
1021:
1007:
1006:
1003:
1000:
996:
995:
992:
940:
937:
924:
921:
919:
918:
902:
901:
891:
888:
879:
865:
863:
857:
833:
830:
829:
828:
810:
760:
757:
754:
753:
752:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
732:eclipse season
709:
708:
707:
706:
685:
684:
648:
645:
644:
643:
609:
603:
602:
601:
567:
564:
549:User:Jarry1250
509:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
489:
488:
478:
477:
469:
468:
463:
462:
461:
456:
455:
450:
449:
443:
442:
427:
424:
422:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
372:
371:
370:
369:
347:
346:
315:
312:
311:
310:
309:
308:
302:
301:
283:
282:
281:
280:
273:
272:
261:
260:
257:Talk:Full moon
252:
251:
250:
249:
242:
241:
237:
236:
235:
234:
228:
227:
217:
216:
209:
208:
207:
206:
199:
198:
194:
193:
192:
191:
184:
183:
177:
176:
173:
172:
171:
170:
163:
162:
158:
157:
156:
155:
144:
143:
138:Not sure what
135:
134:
129:
123:
83:
82:
77:
72:
67:
62:
57:
52:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1834:
1823:
1822:
1818:
1814:
1810:
1809:
1804:
1799:
1797:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1776:
1773:
1772:
1763:
1754:
1750:
1749:
1745:
1741:
1737:
1736:
1731:
1726:
1724:
1720:
1716:
1712:
1708:
1703:
1700:
1699:
1690:
1681:
1677:
1676:
1672:
1668:
1664:
1663:
1658:
1653:
1651:
1647:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1630:
1627:
1626:
1617:
1608:
1605:
1601:
1600:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1587:
1582:
1577:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1563:
1559:
1554:
1551:
1550:
1541:
1532:
1529:
1527:
1526:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1477:
1474:
1460:
1456:
1452:
1448:
1447:
1446:
1442:
1438:
1434:
1430:
1426:
1422:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1412:
1408:
1403:
1402:
1401:
1397:
1393:
1389:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1357:
1351:
1347:
1343:
1342:
1333:
1329:
1325:
1321:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1303:
1299:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1276:
1275:
1271:
1267:
1263:
1259:
1258:
1257:
1256:
1252:
1248:
1240:
1230:
1228:
1227:
1223:
1217:
1211:
1207:
1203:
1198:
1197:
1190:
1188:
1184:
1180:
1176:
1169:
1167:
1162:
1160:
1144:
1140:
1137:
1135:
1134:
1130:
1124:
1115:
1111:
1104:
1097:
1089:
1084:
1080:
1074:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1060:
1056:
1053:
1050:
1046:
1045:
1044:
1040:
1033:
1026:
1022:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1011:
1004:
1001:
998:
997:
993:
991:
987:
983:
978:
977:
976:
975:
971:
967:
963:
959:
955:
950:
946:
938:
936:
934:
930:
922:
917:
914:
912:
910:
904:
903:
900:
896:
892:
889:
886:
882:
881:
880:
876:
869:
862:
858:
856:
855:
851:
847:
843:
839:
831:
827:
823:
819:
815:
811:
809:
805:
801:
797:
792:
787:
786:
785:
784:
780:
776:
769:
755:
745:
741:
737:
733:
729:
728:
727:
723:
719:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
705:
701:
697:
689:
688:
687:
686:
683:
679:
675:
670:
669:
668:
667:
663:
659:
655:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
629:
628:
627:
623:
619:
615:
614:Eclipse cycle
608:
607:Eclipse cycle
604:
600:
596:
592:
588:
587:
586:
585:
581:
577:
573:
565:
563:
562:
558:
554:
550:
545:
543:
539:
534:
531:
519:
514:
507:
501:
498:
493:
492:
491:
490:
487:
484:
480:
479:
475:
474:no firm rules
471:
470:
465:
464:
460:
457:
454:
451:
448:
445:
444:
440:
439:
438:
437:
434:
425:
423:
414:
411:
407:
403:
402:Robert A.West
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
386:
383:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
373:
368:
364:
360:
359:Robert A.West
355:
354:edit conflict
351:
350:
349:
348:
345:
342:
337:
336:
335:
334:
330:
326:
325:Robert A.West
321:
313:
306:
305:
304:
303:
300:
297:
292:
291:
285:
284:
277:
276:
275:
274:
270:
266:
258:
254:
253:
246:
245:
244:
243:
239:
238:
232:
231:
230:
229:
225:
221:
215:
211:
210:
203:
202:
201:
200:
196:
195:
188:
187:
186:
185:
181:
175:
174:
167:
166:
165:
164:
160:
159:
153:
148:
147:
146:
145:
141:
137:
136:
132:
131:
128:
124:
122:
120:
116:
111:
110:
107:
102:
101:
96:
92:
88:
81:
78:
76:
73:
71:
68:
66:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
51:
48:
47:
46:
44:
38:
37:
32:
28:
24:
16:
1806:
1800:
1777:
1769:
1767:
1733:
1727:
1704:
1696:
1694:
1660:
1654:
1631:
1623:
1621:
1584:
1578:
1555:
1547:
1545:
1480:
1451:Victor Engel
1407:Victor Engel
1373:Victor Engel
1324:Victor Engel
1284:Victor Engel
1247:Victor Engel
1234:
1194:
1191:
1172:
1163:
1156:
1119:
1042:
1010:Victor Engel
1008:
982:Victor Engel
942:
926:
908:
878:
835:
813:
790:
778:
775:Victor Engel
772:
718:Victor Engel
674:Victor Engel
650:
633:Victor Engel
611:
591:Victor Engel
569:
546:
535:
529:
515:
511:
497:Victor Engel
483:Mactographer
433:Victor Engel
429:
421:
410:Victor Engel
382:Victor Engel
341:Victor Engel
317:
288:
268:
179:
139:
112:
98:
95:village pump
84:
40:
34:
23:Victor Engel
22:
20:
1808:voting page
1735:voting page
1193:also visit
909:Happysailor
766:Moved from
142:I obscured,
140:plain dates
1792:topic bans
1719:topic bans
1646:topic bans
1570:topic bans
1501:topic bans
1355:Skier Dude
1306:talk to me
1266:talk to me
1112:. You can
169:hypertext.
91:help pages
87:Wikipedian
42:{{helpme}}
1788:site bans
1715:site bans
1642:site bans
1566:site bans
1497:site bans
1433:WP:CSD#G4
1320:WP:REFUND
1298:WP:REFUND
1063:live help
1059:help desk
899:live help
895:help desk
553:LivingBot
220:Full Moon
182:use them,
1175:Zenfolio
1143:Zenfolio
1090:Talkback
949:Zenfolio
939:Zenfolio
538:WP:MINOR
127:Fabartus
1591:Mdann52
1239:Help me
1072:Hallows
1061:or via
929:WP:CITE
897:or via
672:folks.
476:policy.
27:welcome
21:Hello,
1487:. The
1437:VQuakr
1392:VQuakr
1388:WP:DRV
1302:Hghyux
1296:Go to
1262:Hghyux
1210:userfy
966:VQuakr
962:boldly
958:WP:WEB
954:WP:GNG
576:Mfield
265:WP:CIV
214:WP:VPP
25:, and
1425:WP:RS
572:AF447
526:false
190:know.
1817:talk
1778:The
1744:talk
1705:The
1671:talk
1632:The
1595:talk
1556:The
1521:talk
1455:talk
1441:talk
1411:talk
1396:talk
1377:talk
1361:talk
1328:talk
1288:talk
1251:talk
1221:talk
1185:and
1128:talk
1014:talk
986:talk
970:talk
850:talk
822:talk
818:TimL
814:must
804:talk
800:TimL
798:. --
791:very
779:talk
740:talk
736:TimL
722:talk
700:talk
696:TimL
678:talk
662:talk
658:TimL
637:talk
622:talk
618:TimL
595:talk
557:talk
522:true
406:Talk
363:Talk
329:Talk
180:then
115:here
1481:Hi,
956:or
794:of
580:Oi!
530:not
295:nkB
290:Fra
205:so.
119:mav
105:nkB
100:Fra
1819:)
1811:.
1790:,
1746:)
1738:.
1717:,
1673:)
1665:.
1644:,
1597:)
1589:.
1568:,
1523:)
1499:,
1457:)
1443:)
1413:)
1398:)
1379:)
1364:)
1330:)
1312:)
1308:)(
1290:)
1272:)
1268:)(
1253:)
1242:}}
1236:{{
1224:)
1131:)
1081:)
1016:)
988:)
972:)
935:.
852:)
824:)
806:)
796:EQ
781:)
742:)
724:)
702:)
680:)
664:)
639:)
624:)
597:)
582:)
566:Hi
559:)
551:,
481:--
365:)
331:)
152:AD
1815:(
1742:(
1669:(
1593:(
1519:(
1453:(
1439:(
1409:(
1394:(
1375:(
1358:(
1326:(
1304:(
1286:(
1264:(
1249:(
1218:(
1161:.
1125:(
1105:.
1075:(
1051:.
1012:(
984:(
968:(
887:.
848:(
820:(
802:(
777:(
738:(
720:(
698:(
676:(
660:(
635:(
620:(
593:(
578:(
555:(
404:(
361:(
327:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.