550:. As I said at the time 'That user has edited pages such as Brooks High School (Launceston, Tasmania - I was born in London and grew up in North Wales and now live in Sydney. I have never been to Launceston Tasmania and until to day hadn't heard of it. The user has also edited Laches (equity), India - United States relations, Morality and religion, Piaget's theory of cognitive development and Calle 13 (band). I don't know a single thing about any of these subjects. I don't give two hoots.' I have subsequently been accused of being a puppet of 'Watchover/Stravin' Now to address each specific claim: 1.
554:. I do live in Australia's largest city of Sydney, as do 5 million others. 2. Username similarities. Yes, their are slight similarities. But if I really was Enidblyton11, why would I return with such an obvious name? Quite simply, when I created my account I had no idea I was going to be accused of being a puppet of three different editors in different places around the world 3. Similarities in unblock request. I am a new editor. I did contribute. What's the controversy? I don't go around checking every banned editor to ensure my comments are not like theirs 4.
310:
it seems that both you and perhaps he are grinding some sort of contemporary political axe. So pay your penance, write about something else for a while. There is a vast amount of work to be done on
Australian labour history, Welsh labour history, or what have you. Grab a couple books from the library and get busy! All the best to you, really. Just understand — this is for the best of the project. —Tim ///
764:
401:
702:). I note in particular the edits concerning the Australian Greens article, the dispute with User:Timeshift9 (including a bad-faith attempt to have their user page deleted, and your over-the-top response to Timeshift9's suggestion several days ago that this was a sockpuppet account) and various posts which are highly unusual for genuinely new editors (for instance, refering to
670:
914:
923:. Assuming that 144.136.97.19 is in fact your IP address, that puts you in the same geographic area and on the same ISP, making a relation between your accounts at least possible. When combined with all of the behavioral evidence noted above, this makes a relation much more likely, and behavioral evidence in many cases trumps technical evidence anyway.
372:
offer of mentorship that was put forth in the discussion, agree to work on other subjects while learning and let this one go. To do this talk with your mentor, together put forth a proposal most of the editors that expressed an opinion realise that honest attempts done willingly are more successful then forced remedies, they also remember that
326:
infobox. It can take a while to figure out the balance of assertiveness and cooperation that's required here. The problem with getting into such a heated argument is that now we are spending time dealing with the personality clashes instead of the actual article issue at hand. Whatever happens, I wish you the best of luck.
865:
obviously - he refered my to it! User contributions and behaviour are quite different. I am not Enid. I can only say that beacause that's the truth. In regards to the
Username similarities, I tried to register under another name, welshboy I think, but that was rejected. I knew a little about the site
277:
I'm not sure if you read my comment following my vote (not that it was entirely coherent, lack of sleep has been doing that to me lately). You might be getting a bit mixed up in some of the terminology being thrown around in the ANI. To avoid mucking up any description, here is the difference between
371:
Euryalus made an observation about your opposing the proposal, I agree with that. I also recognise that its never easy to know when to let a discussion go even for the most experienced of editors. So now we(both community and you) need to deal what happens next. What I think you can do is accept the
503:
Right about now - at 2:30 AM - might be a good time to roll over, have a snooze, wake up refreshed. Chucking allegations around isn't helping you any. Other admins will check here for any pertinent input, if you have any. Looking at the sock puppet case, it looks to me like something that should be
344:
I'll just add my recurring thought that the real problem here is
Infoboxes, which encourage (simple?) people to try to represent complex matters simplistically in just one or two words. Far too shallow a goal for this encyclopaedia while it aims to be a quality publication. It can never be accurate
309:
I'm of the opinion that you do need to be topic-banned out of the subject. I don't understand at all what your intellectual opponent was on about with the "not a left wing party" reasoning, but your recent nominations of articles on provincial-level Aussie Green
Parties I disagree with strongly and
722:
and move on despite myself and other admins having advised you to do so; aside from this being characteristic of
Enidblyton11's accounts, the above personal attacks on various editors would be sufficient, in isolation of anything else, to lead to an indefinite block. If you think there are good
1084:
I am the user who uses this IP and made some
Liberal Party edits. The IP is shared, I did not make all the edits from this IP. This user and I are not the same person and I request Timeshift9 stop provoking arguments about this. No IP/hostname within this namespace (at least 131.217.*.*) is
558:
I can't help the dispute with
Timeshift9 but I have edited other articles. User Enid11 tried to get 'far-left' added without sources to the Greens whilst I tried to get left-wing added with sources. I didn't try to get Timeshifts page deleted as an attack (that's a lie) but because it breached
325:
I agree with everything
Carrite said above and want to add that you should take the offer of mentorship he made on ANI very seriously. You have a lot to offer the project and I would hate for you to get frustrated and leave. Both Carrite and I agree with the changes you wanted to make to the
1063:
Seems unlikely to me. That IP address is registered to the
University of Tasmania, so unless he's been moving between Sydney and Hobart quite a bit in the last few weeks, they're probably different editors. The editing behaviour looks different to me as well. --
453:
I don't even care about being civil anymore. To attemp to link me to some other accounts whilst I am blocked and cannot respond as you would have seen when you edited this page is low. How about someone unblock me so I can respond to these malicious and vexatious
853:
were totally different. The evidence is that Enid tried to add 'Far-left' and 'Socialism' without sources, and did not take it to the talk page. I did both. In releation to the dispute with
Timeshift, the very first time I edited, he simply wrote:
999:
It wasn't a "shocking unfortuneate coincidence": the deletion of the pages you created by other admins is standard practice for dealing with block evaders, especially those who keep coming back and acting disruptively.
468:
Funnily enough, "shame on you" is how you finished your last unsavoury e-mail to me a year ago. If you've anything to say to defend yourself, post it here. I'm sure someone will copy it to the appropriate forum. --
438:
How gutless can one get? Accusing me of being a sockpuppet whilst blocked so I can't defend myself against these lies and personal attacks. This is malicious and motivated by evil intentions. Shame on you.
187:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Note that it is your apparent failure to adhere to policies which I've raised here - this isn't a place to discuss content disputes.
147:! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Knowledge (XXG) where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Knowledge (XXG) and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!
345:
and meaningful. And, in that context, I would still argue that trying to place all the world's political parties somewhere on a simple (and simplistic!) linear continuum is just plain silly.
920:, and thus not available for comparison to your account. However, the IP address you state is yours is in the same range as one that more-or-less confessed to being Enidblyton11:
628:
624:
685:
418:
414:
184:
232:
and my proposed changes. I will edit in other areas now. I am not going to get involved with or speak too Timeshift. I note he is following me and having a shot at me -
542:
On the first day I edited on this Encylopedia, Timeshift accused me of being a sockpuppet then a meatpuppet of IP 131.217.255.209, which continues editing to this day:
556:
Finally, there is the same rapid progression from starting to edit to a fully-fledged dispute on an Australian Politics page and a dispute with User:Timeshift9
132:
961:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
131:
638:
971:
If people want a lifetime ban, I would request a proper investigation with a checkuser, as apparently is normal practice. That's only fair and decent.
804:
1118:
is available as it has always been, but you must contact an administrator and ask for a review of your situation before you return to editing. --
480:
62:
1085:
publicly accessible and all usage of the IP is monitored by ITR here. Constantly being told I am some random person is not really very cool.
1075:
985:
I cannot believe that do to a shocking unfortuneate coincidence, all my work has been spitefully deleted and my reputation has been destroyed.
946:
740:
1092:
634:
588:
Having a look at Enid's contributions, they are nothing like mine. They are about Enid Blyton books, schools and even Aquaphilia (fetish)
571:
and others. I am telling the truth. I am not misleading anyone. This seems malicious and based upon a desire to 'get' me for anything.
799:
699:
26:
47:
631:). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles.
52:
616:
432:
1129:
724:
777:
677:
376:
sometimes need space and time to learn. The choice on which way you go forward is yours, how you get there may not be.
859:
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Talk:Liberal_Party_of_Australia&oldid=509025257#Seeking_consensus_-_ideology
1115:
771:
56:
818:
776:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
615:
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Knowledge (XXG) appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited
518:
Pete - honestly I am not misleading anyone. Please believe me. I am just sick of these false accusations everyday.
410:
389:
1096:
606:
Please could someone post this on the page - gutless behaviour from one certain accuser prevents me from doing so
33:
22:
69:
1100:
1088:
855:
498:
448:
73:
1124:
1070:
693:
475:
427:
193:
883:
875:
719:
279:
85:
77:
879:
151:
144:
38:
1053:
560:
206:
380:
295:
212:
143:! Thanks for contributing to Knowledge (XXG). Please join other people who edit Knowledge (XXG) at
504:
investigated. If you are misleading others, it doesn't look good to accuse them of lying, hey? --
29:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
564:
1121:
1067:
1041:
543:
472:
424:
84:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
1021:
986:
972:
890:
850:
782:
689:
654:
589:
572:
519:
509:
490:
455:
440:
331:
315:
263:
237:
229:
189:
163:
108:
568:
373:
283:
1005:
955:
748:
730:
350:
97:
871:
862:
703:
1049:
290:
and are enacted only after community discussion, they are vastly different to each other.
1020:
What I mean is the link between me and enid is a shocking and unfortuante coincidence.
377:
291:
209:
1045:
924:
645:
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these
650:
646:
505:
327:
311:
259:
159:
43:
1114:
As with your other accounts, I've removed your ability to edit this talkpage. The
552:
As far as I can tell, both have edited from Telsta IP addresses in the Sydney area
1001:
866:(or a lot) because I edited and have been a user of the site for a while under
744:
547:
400:
346:
233:
93:
234:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Country_Liberal_Party#Proposed_change_to_infobox
867:
1057:
1029:
1009:
994:
980:
936:
898:
752:
658:
597:
580:
527:
513:
463:
383:
354:
335:
319:
299:
267:
245:
215:
197:
167:
116:
101:
88:, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place
870:
IP 144.136.97.19 - I note a different IP to enid's. Please take a look at
714:). The similarity in IP addresses is also a significant piece of evidence
684:
from editing for abuse of multiple accounts. From the evidence posted at
620:
158:
This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood
205:
no opinion on the issue, I see that your new so I suggest you note
81:
718:
with the behavioral evidence. I note also your unwillingness to
417:
for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with
688:
it's pretty clear that this is another sockpuppet account of
544:
http://en.wikipedia.org/Special:Contributions/131.217.255.209
762:
668:
849:
This is a genuine case of mistaken identity. The edits at
943:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
489:
What the hell? I've never emailed you before, crazy man.
963:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
921:
858:
832:
828:
822:
813:
809:
795:
791:
787:
712:
710:
707:
619:, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page
368:
686:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Enidblyton11
415:
Knowledge (XXG):Sockpuppet investigations/Enidblyton11
1036:
Admins, this is one of the IPs i suspect him of using
911:
Checkuser evidence on other Enidblyton11 accounts is
185:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
770:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
228:
I have tried to disengage from the debate about the
409:Your name has been mentioned in connection with a
546:. The IP is based at the University of Tasmania:
611:Disambiguation link notification for September 8
273:Something you might want to have a quick look at
868:http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:144.136.97.19
723:reasons why you should be unblocked, you may
548:http://www.ipf1.com/info/131.217.255.209.html
123:Welshboyau11, you are invited to the Teahouse
8:
286:. Although the two sanctions use the word
183:Hello. There is currently a discussion at
68:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
421:before editing the evidence page. --
92:before the question. Again, welcome!
727:by adding below this notice the text
7:
34:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
25:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for
14:
1044:. Now attempting to edit again.
912:
706:in one of your very first posts
664:Blocked for an indefinite period
419:the guide to responding to cases
399:
130:
53:How to create your first article
617:Enfield London Borough Council
258:I was just looking at that. --
1:
1130:23:09, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1076:23:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1058:21:49, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1030:10:23, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
1010:10:20, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
995:09:52, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
981:06:31, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
937:17:21, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
899:06:28, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
753:23:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
659:18:01, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
598:16:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
581:16:54, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
528:16:49, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
514:16:40, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
499:16:38, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
481:16:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
464:16:28, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
449:16:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
433:15:51, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
395:
384:03:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)
355:22:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
336:15:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
320:14:49, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
300:09:14, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
268:08:44, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
246:10:25, 6 September 2012 (UTC)
216:08:54, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
198:02:48, 2 September 2012 (UTC)
1101:11:25, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
709:and noting obscure policies
149:
774:, who declined the request.
168:04:32, 25 August 2012 (UTC)
117:08:26, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
107:Hi Nick-D. Thanks for that.
102:08:17, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
1145:
739:, but you should read the
128:
63:Simplified Manual of Style
947:guide to appealing blocks
861:This is how I knew about
741:guide to appealing blocks
86:Knowledge (XXG):Questions
21:Hello, Welshboyau11, and
1025:
990:
976:
894:
593:
576:
523:
494:
459:
444:
241:
112:
48:How to develop articles
767:
673:
413:case. Please refer to
886:. I am not a sock of
819:change block settings
766:
735:Your reason here ~~~~
672:
647:opt-out instructions
629:fix with Dab solver
768:
674:
637:• Join us at the
152:Visit the Teahouse
44:How to edit a page
27:your contributions
1091:comment added by
851:Australian Greens
725:appeal this block
642:
407:
406:
230:Australian Greens
176:
175:
171:
76:your messages on
1136:
1110:Talk page access
1103:
960:
954:
916:
915:
838:
836:
825:
807:
805:deleted contribs
765:
738:
671:
632:
625:check to confirm
403:
396:
170:
156:
154:
134:
127:
126:
91:
1144:
1143:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1112:
1093:131.217.255.209
1086:
1038:
966:
958:
952:
951:, then use the
940:
913:
902:
826:
816:
802:
785:
778:blocking policy
763:
760:
755:
728:
669:
666:
639:DPL WikiProject
613:
540:
394:
365:
307:
275:
256:
226:
181:
172:
157:
155:
150:
125:
89:
19:
12:
11:
5:
1142:
1140:
1116:standard offer
1111:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1079:
1078:
1037:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
941:
932:
929:
909:
905:Decline reason
847:
843:Request reason
840:
761:
759:
756:
720:drop the stick
716:in combination
675:You have been
667:
665:
662:
612:
609:
603:
602:
601:
600:
539:
536:
535:
534:
533:
532:
531:
530:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
405:
404:
393:
387:
364:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
339:
338:
306:
303:
274:
271:
255:
252:
250:
225:
222:
221:
220:
219:
218:
180:
177:
174:
173:
137:
135:
124:
121:
120:
119:
66:
65:
60:
57:Article Wizard
50:
41:
36:
18:
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1141:
1132:
1131:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1123:
1117:
1109:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1083:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1073:
1072:
1069:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1055:
1051:
1047:
1046:Helen of Troy
1043:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1019:
1011:
1007:
1003:
998:
997:
996:
992:
988:
984:
983:
982:
978:
974:
970:
969:
968:
967:
965:
964:
957:
950:
948:
939:
938:
935:
934:
933:
930:
927:
922:
919:
908:
906:
901:
900:
896:
892:
889:
885:
881:
877:
873:
869:
864:
860:
857:
856:WP:SOCKPUPPET
852:
846:
844:
839:
834:
830:
824:
820:
815:
811:
806:
801:
797:
796:global blocks
793:
792:active blocks
789:
784:
779:
775:
773:
772:administrator
757:
754:
750:
746:
742:
736:
732:
726:
721:
717:
713:
711:
708:
705:
701:
698:
695:
691:
687:
683:
680:
679:
663:
661:
660:
656:
652:
648:
643:
640:
636:
630:
626:
622:
618:
610:
608:
607:
599:
595:
591:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
582:
578:
574:
570:
566:
562:
557:
553:
549:
545:
537:
529:
525:
521:
517:
516:
515:
511:
507:
502:
501:
500:
496:
492:
488:
482:
479:
478:
477:
474:
467:
466:
465:
461:
457:
452:
451:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
435:
434:
431:
430:
429:
426:
420:
416:
412:
402:
398:
397:
391:
388:
386:
385:
382:
379:
375:
370:
363:some thoughts
362:
356:
352:
348:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
333:
329:
324:
323:
322:
321:
317:
313:
304:
302:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
284:community ban
281:
272:
270:
269:
265:
261:
253:
251:
248:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
223:
217:
214:
211:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
186:
178:
169:
165:
161:
153:
148:
146:
142:
136:
133:
129:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
105:
104:
103:
99:
95:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
64:
61:
58:
54:
51:
49:
45:
42:
40:
37:
35:
32:
31:
30:
28:
24:
16:
1120:
1119:
1113:
1087:— Preceding
1066:
1065:
1048:last night.
1039:
1022:Welshboyau11
987:Welshboyau11
973:Welshboyau11
962:
944:
942:
926:
925:
917:
910:
904:
903:
891:Welshboyau11
887:
884:WP:QUICKSOCK
876:WP:FIRSTEDIT
848:
842:
841:
814:creation log
783:Welshboyau11
781:
769:
758:Final Appeal
734:
715:
696:
690:Enidblyton11
682:indefinitely
681:
676:
644:
614:
605:
604:
590:Welshboyau11
573:Welshboyau11
555:
551:
541:
520:Welshboyau11
491:Welshboyau11
471:
470:
456:Welshboyau11
441:Welshboyau11
423:
422:
411:sockpuppetry
408:
390:Sockpuppetry
366:
308:
287:
276:
257:
249:
238:Welshboyau11
227:
190:AndyTheGrump
182:
145:the Teahouse
141:Welshboyau11
140:
138:
109:Welshboyau11
67:
59:if you wish)
20:
880:WP:BRANDNEW
538:My Response
374:new editors
90:{{help me}}
80:using four
55:(using the
810:filter log
649:. Thanks,
561:WP:NOTBLOG
369:ANI thread
207:WP:CANVASS
78:talk pages
70:Wikipedian
1050:Timeshift
945:read the
829:checkuser
788:block log
633:Read the
292:Blackmane
280:topic ban
72:! Please
1089:unsigned
1042:contribs
800:contribs
733:|reason=
700:contribs
565:WP:UPNOT
305:Hi there
39:Tutorial
17:Welcome!
956:unblock
823:unblock
743:first.
731:unblock
678:blocked
651:DPL bot
621:Enfield
569:WP:SOAP
454:claims?
367:In the
328:Sperril
312:Carrite
224:Dispute
160:HostBot
23:welcome
1122:Lear's
1068:Lear's
1002:Nick-D
888:anyone
872:WP:ECA
863:WP:SPI
745:Nick-D
704:WP:SPI
473:Lear's
425:Lear's
347:HiLo48
282:and a
94:Nick-D
82:tildes
949:first
918:Stale
381:garra
213:garra
1125:Fool
1097:talk
1071:Fool
1054:talk
1040:See
1026:talk
1006:talk
991:talk
977:talk
931:fold
928:Hers
895:talk
882:and
749:talk
694:talk
655:talk
594:talk
577:talk
524:talk
510:talk
506:Pete
495:talk
476:Fool
460:talk
445:talk
428:Fool
392:case
378:Gnan
351:talk
332:talk
316:talk
296:talk
264:talk
260:Pete
242:talk
210:Gnan
194:talk
179:AN/I
164:talk
113:talk
98:talk
74:sign
46:and
833:log
780:).
635:FAQ
288:ban
254:ANI
139:Hi
1099:)
1056:)
1028:)
1008:)
993:)
979:)
959:}}
953:{{
907::
897:)
878:,
874:,
845::
827:•
821:•
817:•
812:•
808:•
803:•
798:•
794:•
790:•
751:)
737:}}
729:{{
657:)
627:|
596:)
579:)
567:,
563:,
526:)
512:)
497:)
462:)
447:)
353:)
334:)
318:)
298:)
278:a
266:)
244:)
236:.
196:)
166:)
115:)
100:)
1095:(
1052:(
1024:(
1004:(
989:(
975:(
893:(
837:)
835:)
831:(
786:(
747:(
697:·
692:(
653:(
641:.
623:(
592:(
575:(
522:(
508:(
493:(
458:(
443:(
349:(
330:(
314:(
294:(
262:(
240:(
192:(
162:(
111:(
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
