Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:WhyDoIKeepForgetting

Source 📝

1283: 671: 1323: 456: 114: 749:
shall bring all faiths - whole population of the world - to one faith only. Ahmadiyya faith believes that Mirza Ghulam Ahmad was the Promised Messiah (second coming of Jesus) and this person claims that he is the Promised Son as prophesied by Mirza Ghulam Ahmad. Please undo your deletion or I have to dispute it. --
179:
I don't think I did violate the 3RR, since it specifies "Contributors must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period". The only 24 hour period in which I made three edits on that page includes one try for a compromise, which you rejected without discussing it on the
992:
Nobody made the move you suggested was made. My user page was never created until you just did it. I had erroneously placed the JD article in mainspace, rather than in my userspace. Someone moved the article from mainspace to a subpage of my userspace. You didn't "recreate" my user page, you created
961:
Whoever renamed User:WhyDoIKeepForgetting to User:WhyDoIKeepForgetting/JohnDerbyshire (or vice versa, don't know how that works) incorrectly removed the WhyDoIKeepForgetting user page in the mistaken belief that WhyDoIKeepForgetting was JohnDerbyshire writing about himself (WP:NO Autobiography) when
224:
I edited some of the facts on Rabwah article and you kep removing them i have also added references for those facts and you still edited them with citation needed ? would you please check the referenced articles for proof ! if you agree ill add some of those facts again i agree with the grammatical
1051:
First, please keep discussion of articles to their talk pages, unless there is a reason why your question is really only relevant to me. "the project risks alienating Conservative Christians from Conservapedia." is not verifiable. It is an opinion. "Joe Schmo, a conservative minister from Alabama,
748:
You have deleted the para I have added. This is about a self-claimed prophet. I myself does not agree with his claim however, in term of whether there is a claim or not, it a fact. I have linked it to his website. His significance is because of his claim only. He claims to be the promised one, who
965:
This mistaken edit orphaned the Talk:WhyDoIKeepForgetting discussion page and perpetrates what WhyDoIKeepForgetting claimed was the false impression that WhyDoIKeepForgetting is JohnDerbyshire. WhyDoIEvenCare? IDoNotReallyKnow but IAmReallyBored and IHaveTooMuchTimeOnMyHands and am feeling really
764:
In order for a paragraph to be encyclopedic, it must not only be true, but also notable. There are many, many people who claim to be "the promised one". Most of them are insane, grifters, or both. We cannot include details on someone simply because he is bonkers or a con man; he must also have a
654:
I've removed the bit about Women's suffrage several times since it looked like OR and certainly made no sense in an encylopedic article the way it was written. I'm glad you found out it was just copied from a website. Of course, everytime I removed it as OR it was restored with a lame reason.
886:
Hi, I have moved the draft you have been writing to your username space. In future please write all drafts in user space rather than main space, and then only move them once you are satisfied that they are no longer draft. Also please be aware of the potential
288:
tags. Nobody is going to read every related link, but if they want to find information on a particular fact they will look at the reference in the citation. Please see almost any other wiki page for how to do this. The links on your talk plage will also explain
331:
The article can be made more neutral if the name of the city is changed to Chnabnager. This is the official and guzetted name of thee city. I wonder if you would call Mumbai as Bombay, Chanai as Madras or Varansi as Banaras. I hope i am not doing any vandalism
540:
evolved, but wasn't). I reckon linking between the articles might be justified, but including a special section is misplaced and potentially confusing for readers. Anyway, I've left the text in for now, but would be interested in your view. Best regards,
558:
I know it's been resolved now, but I meant to tell you earlier that I think the original wording "the Bell Curve" was okay. It's acceptable to delete initial "the" from proper nouns in some circumstances. To make an analogy, you would always say "the
1335:
is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
1166:, "sers may freely remove comments from their own talk pages, though archiving is preferred. They may also remove some content in archiving. The removal of a warning is taken as evidence that the warning has been read by the user." Thanks. 261:
The statements i added their references are linked below in the reference list if you cared to check them ! two are from the book that you have to read while all others are online linked articles that you can read yourself and make up your
1132:
Please keep talk about articles on their article talk pages. Your edit comment suggested I look at his website. Before reverting, I looked for a couple of these facts in his bio page on his website, which does not mention McCartney or
811:
I am pretending no such thing, and reverting your bizarre promotions of a self-proclaimed prophet is not edit warring -- I explained the reasons I did so, I referred to Knowledge (XXG) policy, and I did not come close to violating the
688:
prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the
1363: 153:
Let me add, in addition to the boilerplate message above, that you have already violated this rule. Since you are a new user I will not report this violation, but I urge you to read and adhere to our policies like
1074:
Thanks for the clean-up on the article. I removed the {{NPOV}} because you didn't explain what needed to be cleaned-up on the talk page as the template suggests. Please add both back at your earliest convenience.
1239:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 834:
This discussion does not belong on my user page. I will no longer reply to your comments here about this particular article. If you want to comment on the content of an article, use that article's talk page.
962:
WhyDoIKeepForgetting later stated WhyDoIKeepForgetting only posted the article on John Derbyshire by the man himself and WhyDoIKeepForgetting was not John Derbyshire. Whew. Got that? I am not repeating it.
1347:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1090:
I'll find citations for those things you reverted. They're very easy to find. I suggest you add your fact tags as {{fact|date=November 2009}}. While you're at it, might as well get fact tags on
129:
prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for
532:
section of this article. While I thought it was fascinating (and thanks for bringing it to my attention), I reckon that it doesn't belong here because the formal system states (which
1197:
was not vandalism, and you ought not to have twinkled it back as such; it was a good faith content dispute and the editor deserves an explanation for your revert. It's
849:
The Steps taken by WhyDoIKeepForgetting have made the article more netral/Less offending for Muslims, but I insist that the official name of the city be Used.
31: 137:. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you. 1377: 1264: 635: 497:
before editing in this regard. Editors should note that failure to follow this policy may result in the removal of editing privileges.--
243:) added no citations, while inserting many unverified statements. Also, please use the article talk page for talking about the article. 745:{{(diff) (hist) . . Mirza Ghulam Ahmad‎; 21:20 . . (-164) . . WhyDoIKeepForgetting (talk | contribs) (this person is not notable)}} 303:
I also do not wish to be your Knowledge (XXG) tutor. If you can't figure out how to edit pages to community standards, please go to
1163: 694: 53: 1373: 1260: 981: 880: 1356: 876: 48: 593:
you're right, the discussion didn't happen at the talk page, although it should, my bad. anyway, please take a look in here:
1110:, when they started as a skittle band. And did they really form in Liverpool in 1960? It's uncited. You're missing a lot of 690: 685: 134: 126: 329:
I have gone through the edits you have done and these edits are good in making the article less offensive to the Muslim.
1251:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
712: 122: 58: 1368: 1256: 1119: 1080: 628:
it illustrates his general look, spectacles, detectivating power, nicotine addiction and his dangerously red shirt.
911:
OK. Also, I am not John Derbyshire. I copied this article from a version of his article apparently written by him.
594: 579: 820: 225:
mistakes and some places where i may have been a bit biased but most of the text i added was true and factual ! --
1202: 1137: 1053: 994: 985: 912: 836: 774: 614: 517: 502: 387: 308: 244: 181: 613:
anything about Gently. That is, there is no information about Gently in the picture that is not in the article.
38: 27: 521: 1344: 65: 639: 816: 789: 766: 631: 482:
be immediately removed. Note that the removal does not imply that the information is either true or false.
69: 1115: 1076: 1016: 971: 966:
WP:BE BOLD right now. WhyDoIKeepForgetting, here is your user page back. John Derbyshire can get his own.
865: 857: 732:
Your interpretation of "edit war" is not supported by the link in the above "warning". BTW, have you read
536:
have been evolved) are fundamentally different from the state described by the omphalos hypothesis (which
408: 362: 337: 1252: 698: 597:. I don't mind taking the image down if we find something better; but at the moment that's all we've got 81: 73: 1282: 1159: 435: 107: 824: 676: 130: 43: 1173: 937: 899: 660: 498: 273: 230: 1331: 1313: 1228: 1219: 952:
moved here from User:WhyDoIKeepForgetting after making the red link WhyDoIKeepForgetting a blue link
733: 797: 750: 722: 525: 1340: 1248: 1232: 801: 754: 204: 168: 143: 97: 85: 34:. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: 426:
For what it's worth, C-SPAN is very permissive about the use of its video content. They have a
80:(~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out 1162:
that asked the user to cease removing warnings from their talk page. Please be aware that per
1041: 1012: 967: 861: 853: 402: 356: 333: 1352: 1244: 1236: 490: 304: 1036:
that's almost a direct paraphrase of the material on the last page. Am I missing something?
431: 1355:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1348: 1247:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1240: 1198: 888: 494: 467: 449: 159: 155: 1300: 1190: 1167: 930: 892: 656: 269: 226: 828: 770: 706: 702: 471: 121:
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be
1206: 718: 602: 180:
talk page. Furthermore, you are the one refusing to answer specifics on the talk page.
1381: 1304: 1268: 1213: 1179: 1145: 1123: 1084: 1061: 1045: 1020: 1002: 975: 943: 920: 905: 869: 844: 805: 782: 758: 726: 670: 664: 643: 622: 583: 548: 506: 439: 415: 395: 369: 341: 316: 277: 252: 234: 209: 189: 173: 148: 113: 101: 542: 529: 463: 348: 199: 163: 138: 93: 794:
These notability guidelines only outline how suitable a topic is for its own article
455: 1037: 1322: 1099: 1068: 564: 400:
If they're uploaded by the copyright holder, then yes, they would be reliable.
297: 1296: 376: 489:
unless you can provide reliable citations, and can ensure it is written in a
292:
I will no longer reply to you here on this issue. If you wish to discuss the
681: 598: 571: 427: 701:
among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek
1359:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1235:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge (XXG)
560: 765:
large number of followers and coverage in reliable secondary sources.
1189:
Good day, WhyDoIKeepForgetting. Although we were in agreement at the
380: 293: 218: 788:
You are pretending as if you are wikipedia expert. Please refer to
478:
negative material. Negative material that does not comply with that
77: 1193:
article, I feel the latest edits could have been handled better.
1136:
This seems to have made you very angry. I do not understand why.
1106:, I don't know if that's verifiable. And it says that they're a 1362:
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review
891:
issues when writing an article about yourself. Thank you. --
693:. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to 796:. Your actions are falling in the category of Edit War. -- 454: 112: 287:
Statements in articles need to be cited with <ref: -->
1343:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
1194: 1034: 470:. Biographical material must always be referenced from 384: 241: 1102:
article, there's some uncited statements like they're
705:, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request 1164:
Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines#User talk pages
88:, or ask your question on this page and then place 1052:said that the project risks . . ." is verifiable. 1011:So roleplayer and naamanbrown both sit corrected. 198:What nonsense. I'm discussing everything on talk. 1227:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 1114:that have no citations. Keep up the good work. -- 697:to work towards wording and content that gains a 520:. Just to say that I've put a comment on the 133:, even if they do not technically violate the 8: 1295:Congratz on getting Extended Confirmed User 125:from editing Knowledge (XXG). Note that the 1329:Hello, WhyDoIKeepForgetting. Voting in the 468:policy on the biographies of living persons 680:according to the reverts you have made on 64:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 982:User:WhyDoIKeepForgetting/John Derbyshire 881:User:WhyDoIKeepForgetting/John Derbyshire 674:You currently appear to be engaged in an 877:John Derbyshire/draft by the man himself 709:. Please stop the disruption, otherwise 92:before the question. Again, welcome! 815:Even if I'm wrong about the scope of 7: 1332:2016 Arbitration Committee elections 984:is still out there but is no longer 383:footage, uploaded by C-SPAN itself? 1345:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 354:YouTube is not a reliable source. 39:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 860:) 15:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC)None 385:No matter, I've added new sources. 30:to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for 14: 1289:The Tireless Contributor Barnstar 1253:review the candidates' statements 26:Hello, WhyDoIKeepForgetting, and 1321: 1281: 669: 1208: 569: 1259:. For the Election committee, 1229:Arbitration Committee election 1220:ArbCom elections are now open! 1158:Hi, I noticed your message at 1096:with nine brothers and sisters 466:that does not comply with our 1: 1382:22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC) 1269:13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC) 1180:17:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC) 727:21:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC) 695:discuss controversial changes 644:04:49, 20 December 2008 (UTC) 584:01:51, 24 November 2008 (UTC) 487:do not reinsert this material 462:I have removed material from 440:03:12, 19 December 2008 (UTC) 210:04:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 190:03:14, 3 September 2008 (UTC) 174:19:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 149:19:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC) 1146:08:14, 8 November 2009 (UTC) 1124:08:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC) 1085:00:55, 5 November 2009 (UTC) 1062:13:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 1046:04:52, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 1021:17:07, 12 October 2009 (UTC) 870:15:25, 16 October 2009 (UTC) 623:17:53, 3 December 2008 (UTC) 549:14:19, 30 October 2008 (UTC) 507:19:49, 21 October 2008 (UTC) 416:01:46, 20 October 2008 (UTC) 396:06:28, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 370:05:50, 19 October 2008 (UTC) 342:06:40, 13 October 2009 (UTC) 317:18:15, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 278:17:02, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 253:15:07, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 235:10:27, 11 October 2009 (UTC) 54:How to write a great article 1366:and submit your choices on 1305:17:26, 13 August 2016 (UTC) 1255:and submit your choices on 1003:22:45, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 976:12:04, 1 October 2009 (UTC) 665:20:00, 6 January 2009 (UTC) 1399: 1374:MediaWiki message delivery 1364:the candidates' statements 1261:MediaWiki message delivery 1280: 1214:17:24, 10 July 2010 (UTC) 986:User:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 944:09:12, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 921:09:09, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 906:09:03, 30 July 2009 (UTC) 845:17:43, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 806:12:36, 22 July 2009 (UTC) 783:19:52, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 759:19:18, 20 July 2009 (UTC) 595:for deletion/2008 June 21 327:Dear WhyDoIKeepForgetting 296:article, please do so on 82:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 1154:Removing talk page edits 1141: 1098:. I was also looking at 1057: 998: 916: 840: 778: 618: 391: 312: 248: 185: 102:16:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC) 459: 404:Little Red Riding Hood 358:Little Red Riding Hood 118: 1341:Arbitration Committee 1314:ArbCom Elections 2016 1233:Arbitration Committee 1160:User talk:Khan197khan 495:the relevant policies 458: 116: 108:Houston A. Baker, Jr. 1138:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 1054:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 995:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 957:unsolicited "rescue" 913:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 889:conflict of interest 837:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 775:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 615:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 554:"the The Bell Curve" 518:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 388:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 309:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 245:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 182:WhyDoIKeepForgetting 1274:A barnstar for you! 1237:arbitration process 563:album", never "the 526:omphalos hypothesis 1357:arbitration policy 1316:: Voting now open! 1249:arbitration policy 703:dispute resolution 605:) 3 December 2008 460: 119: 49:How to edit a page 32:your contributions 1310: 1309: 691:three-revert rule 686:three-revert rule 634:comment added by 589:Dirk Gently Image 546: 428:very clear policy 377:video in question 208: 172: 147: 135:three-revert rule 127:three-revert rule 72:your messages on 1390: 1325: 1285: 1278: 1277: 1211: 1210: 1176: 1170: 1092:in Hubbard, Ohio 934: 896: 821:wp:Verifiability 684:. Note that the 673: 646: 575: 544: 493:. Please review 472:reliable sources 430:on the matter. - 414: 411: 405: 368: 365: 359: 240:Your last edit ( 202: 166: 141: 91: 74:discussion pages 1398: 1397: 1393: 1392: 1391: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1369:the voting page 1326: 1318: 1276: 1257:the voting page 1223: 1207: 1191:John Derbyshire 1187: 1174: 1168: 1156: 1072: 1031: 959: 954: 932: 894: 884: 792:. This states 743: 707:page protection 652: 629: 591: 582: 556: 514: 499:Scott MacDonald 453: 409: 403: 401: 363: 357: 355: 352: 222: 111: 89: 59:Manual of Style 19: 12: 11: 5: 1396: 1394: 1327: 1320: 1319: 1317: 1311: 1308: 1307: 1292: 1291: 1286: 1275: 1272: 1226: 1222: 1217: 1203:WP:BRRRRRBLOCK 1186: 1183: 1155: 1152: 1151: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1134: 1127: 1126: 1116:Walter Görlitz 1077:Walter Görlitz 1071: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1030: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1023: 1006: 1005: 958: 955: 953: 950: 949: 948: 947: 946: 924: 923: 883: 873: 851: 850: 847: 832: 813: 786: 785: 773:explain more. 742: 739: 738: 737: 651: 648: 626: 625: 590: 587: 578: 555: 552: 528:regarding the 513: 510: 452: 446: 445: 444: 443: 442: 421: 420: 419: 418: 375:Even when the 351: 346: 345: 330: 328: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 320: 319: 301: 290: 266: 265: 264: 263: 256: 255: 221: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 193: 192: 110: 105: 62: 61: 56: 51: 46: 41: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1395: 1384: 1383: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1365: 1360: 1358: 1354: 1350: 1346: 1342: 1337: 1334: 1333: 1324: 1315: 1312: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1293: 1290: 1287: 1284: 1279: 1273: 1271: 1270: 1266: 1262: 1258: 1254: 1250: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1221: 1218: 1216: 1215: 1212: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1184: 1182: 1181: 1178: 1177: 1171: 1165: 1161: 1153: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1125: 1121: 1117: 1113: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1070: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1055: 1050: 1049: 1048: 1047: 1043: 1039: 1035: 1029:Conservapedia 1028: 1022: 1018: 1014: 1010: 1009: 1008: 1007: 1004: 1000: 996: 991: 990: 989: 987: 983: 978: 977: 973: 969: 963: 956: 951: 945: 942: 941: 940: 936: 935: 928: 927: 926: 925: 922: 918: 914: 910: 909: 908: 907: 904: 903: 902: 898: 897: 890: 882: 878: 874: 872: 871: 867: 863: 859: 855: 848: 846: 842: 838: 833: 830: 826: 822: 818: 817:wp:Notability 814: 810: 809: 808: 807: 803: 799: 795: 791: 790:wp:Notability 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 767:wp:Notability 763: 762: 761: 760: 756: 752: 746: 740: 735: 731: 730: 729: 728: 724: 720: 716: 714: 708: 704: 700: 696: 692: 687: 683: 679: 678: 672: 667: 666: 662: 658: 649: 647: 645: 641: 637: 636:98.210.159.26 633: 624: 620: 616: 612: 608: 607: 606: 604: 600: 596: 588: 586: 585: 581: 580:Contributions 576: 574: 573: 566: 562: 553: 551: 550: 547: 539: 535: 531: 530:formal system 527: 523: 519: 511: 509: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 483: 481: 477: 473: 469: 465: 464:Michael Levin 457: 451: 447: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 424: 423: 422: 417: 413: 412: 406: 399: 398: 397: 393: 389: 386: 382: 378: 374: 373: 372: 371: 367: 366: 360: 350: 349:Chuck Schumer 347: 344: 343: 339: 335: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 299: 295: 291: 286: 285: 284: 283: 282: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 260: 259: 258: 257: 254: 250: 246: 242: 239: 238: 237: 236: 232: 228: 220: 217: 211: 206: 201: 197: 196: 195: 194: 191: 187: 183: 178: 177: 176: 175: 170: 165: 161: 157: 151: 150: 145: 140: 136: 132: 128: 124: 115: 109: 106: 104: 103: 99: 95: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 67: 60: 57: 55: 52: 50: 47: 45: 42: 40: 37: 36: 35: 33: 29: 24: 23: 16: 1367: 1361: 1338: 1330: 1328: 1288: 1224: 1188: 1172: 1157: 1111: 1107: 1103: 1095: 1091: 1073: 1032: 1013:Naaman Brown 979: 968:Naaman Brown 964: 960: 939: 938: 931: 901: 900: 893: 885: 862:Nonenone4000 854:Nonenone4000 852: 831:still apply. 793: 787: 747: 744: 715:from editing 710: 675: 668: 653: 627: 610: 592: 570: 568: 557: 537: 533: 515: 491:neutral tone 486: 484: 479: 475: 461: 448:Please read 407: 361: 353: 334:Nonenone4000 326: 267: 223: 152: 131:edit warring 120: 86:my talk page 84:, ask me on 63: 25: 21: 20: 1100:The Beatles 1069:Phil Keaggy 825:wp:linkspam 711:you may be 630:—Preceding 609:It doesn't 565:The Beatles 298:talk:Rabwah 76:using four 1353:topic bans 1245:topic bans 1133:Nashville. 1033:Regarding 929:Oh OK. -- 875:Move from 734:WP:SELFPUB 657:dougweller 611:illustrate 476:especially 270:EhsanAhmad 227:EhsanAhmad 90:{{helpme}} 66:Wikipedian 1349:site bans 1241:site bans 1209:Skomorokh 1195:This edit 1108:rock band 719:Mark Shaw 699:consensus 682:John Lott 650:John Lott 567:album". 516:Hi there 68:! Please 980:Article 798:On.quest 751:On.quest 741:On.Quest 677:edit war 632:unsigned 538:could be 522:talkpage 512:Omphalos 200:Gamaliel 164:Gamaliel 139:Gamaliel 94:Fribbler 44:Tutorial 22:Welcome! 1185:Careful 1104:English 1038:JoshuaZ 713:blocked 561:Beatles 545:LUMBAGO 524:of the 485:Please 305:WP:HELP 123:blocked 117:Warning 28:welcome 17:Welcome 1231:. The 1201:, not 1199:WP:BRD 827:, and 534:cannot 450:WP:BLP 381:C-SPAN 294:Rabwah 219:Rabwah 160:WP:BLP 156:WP:3RR 78:tildes 1297:Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ 1175:Cobra 1169:Glass 1112:facts 829:wp:rs 771:wp:RS 262:mind. 1378:talk 1339:The 1301:talk 1265:talk 1142:talk 1120:talk 1094:and 1081:talk 1058:talk 1042:talk 1017:talk 999:talk 993:it. 972:talk 933:role 917:talk 895:role 866:talk 858:talk 841:talk 812:3rr. 802:talk 779:talk 769:and 755:talk 723:talk 661:talk 640:talk 619:talk 603:talk 599:Chnt 572:Soap 503:talk 480:must 436:talk 432:Pete 410:talk 392:talk 364:talk 338:talk 313:talk 289:how. 274:talk 249:talk 231:talk 205:talk 186:talk 169:talk 158:and 144:talk 98:talk 70:sign 1225:Hi, 1205::) 879:to 379:is 1380:) 1372:. 1351:, 1303:) 1267:) 1243:, 1144:) 1122:) 1083:) 1075:-- 1060:) 1044:) 1019:) 1001:) 988:. 974:) 919:) 868:) 843:) 823:, 819:, 804:) 781:) 757:) 725:) 717:. 663:) 642:) 621:) 541:-- 505:) 474:, 438:) 394:) 340:) 315:) 307:. 276:) 268:-- 251:) 233:) 188:) 162:. 100:) 1376:( 1299:( 1263:( 1140:( 1118:( 1079:( 1056:( 1040:( 1015:( 997:( 970:( 915:( 864:( 856:( 839:( 800:( 777:( 753:( 736:? 721:( 659:( 638:( 617:( 601:( 577:/ 543:P 501:( 434:( 390:( 336:( 311:( 300:. 272:( 247:( 229:( 207:) 203:( 184:( 171:) 167:( 146:) 142:( 96:(

Index

welcome
your contributions
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
Tutorial
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign
discussion pages
tildes
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
my talk page
Fribbler
talk
16:31, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
Houston A. Baker, Jr.
Warning
blocked
three-revert rule
edit warring
three-revert rule
Gamaliel
talk
19:49, 2 September 2008 (UTC)
WP:3RR
WP:BLP
Gamaliel
talk
19:59, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑