1616:
talk page, or you could have moved the details in some different sections, you could have enhance the claim by citing the works and findings mentioned in those lengthy documentaries - but they simply deleted the whole data I inserted not only once - but several times. No action was taken against those who indiscriminately and repeatedly reverted the same data again and again all within a while - but surprisingly I was blocked!! I told them that these YouTube
Documentaries are not the source of the data I inserted, they refer to the hundreds of old manuscript, inscription, archaeological proofs, and books written by scholars not from India - but mainly from western countries. But I was replied "The Government of India was not established, nor is it qualified, to judge the history of early Christianity... and the purpose of BBC is only to entertain people!!..." Before making comments here none of them gone though those documentaries - I am sure, because it takes atleast 1 hour to watch these information and cross-check the references mentioned there - but my edits were reverted and I was blocked within few minutes. I simply
1758:, not hard has *he* knows lots of people...). Right now I can not be sure if you are a friend of JW or not, so allow me to doubt it, but ultimately I don't care. What I care is, can you help build the encyclopaedia? What do you plan to do while editing WP? Unfortunately there was some... noise... - it is a sad common practice on the net, not specifically WP - noise that hid out the many good advices presented. In such a large bunch of people likely there will be someone that unnerves you, and that you will unnerve someone. What do you plan to do then? Note that it may be frustrating at times, but, say, the three-revert-rule is fundamental to have some peace and stability in here. It is probably the only policy that is clear cut: making 3 reverts gets you blocked. It is paramount that you understand, acknowledge, and then keep it if you want to stay around. So, what do you have to give to WP? -
986:
university-level researchers are a community with community-wide standards, so I was not expressing my personal point of view. Limiting ourselves just to say the first four sentences of the video, it is not my personal opinion that it is silly - I am saying that it violates all the standards that the scholarly community expects of scholarly work. I started watching with an entirely open mind (believe it or not) but it was the actual words that the narrator spoke that convinced me that this is a work not meant to be taken seriously by scholars. If you wish to know what works meant to be taken seriously by scholars look like, read any of the books by well-respected scholars and published by respected academic presses, or articles in peer-reviewed journals, cited by the current Jesus article.
1607:, and we exchanged few emails. Wiki-projects at that time was in a rudimentary stage, but jimmy and I has a bold conviction that this project is gonna be biggest cultural phenomenon of the history of mankind. Its the foundation stone for a better, safer and united world - where knowledge and fraternity shall prevail. Because both of us dreamed for a unified world. We thought that through wikiproject we'll be able to develop an universal fraternity - which was more required at that time of terrorized world. But see, how our dream has been shattered, and what type of people we get in this projects, they come here not to contribute, but show their power... which culminates to
310:
facts you can present the arguments of the both sides, but you CANNOT forcibly suppress the other point of view and delete data. But this is exactly what this "experienced" users were doing. They are not even willing to see the references I have given. I told them repeatedly not to continuously revert my changes as a topic regarding this already created in the discussion page, so that users can discuss there until a consensus is being made. But they were reluctant to hear. If my edits are disputed, then
Knowledge (XXG) has a clear policy on disputed facts : to present arguments from the BOTH sides - That's what I am doing.
1632:. Anyway maybe I am repeating the same thing to you which you may have gone through before. Nabla, You see one thing, I don't want to be unblocked by them, and I have already put it an end, but still they are more concerned of finding my faults in a microscopic way... hahaha. Wiki doesn't have a harmonious and collegial environment anymore - because people like you seldom get time to contribute and monitor, and that's quite natural - I can understand. Let the block be indef, so that I can show it to Jimmy or any of our common friends, and we'll definitely find some way to attract more people like you... cuidar --
456:. If you were not agree - you could raise a debate in the talk page, or you could move the details in some different sections, you could have enhance the claim by citing the works and findings mentioned in those lengthy documentaries - but you simply deleted the whole data I inserted not only once - but several times. No action was taken against those who indiscriminately and repeatedly reverted the same data again and again all within a while - but surprisingly I was blocked!! You should know one thing - no matter how much you misuse your Wiki-admin power, you can
1611:. I joined as an editor just few months ago, but they interpret me as newcomer who doesn't have any knowledge of wiki policies. Just go from the Top to bottom of my page, line by line, you'll see how moronic they were while replying to my post, same post again and again, and I had to restate same reply again and again - the thing is everyone replied reading the previous post - no one cared to read it as a whole! Nabla, if things goes on like this, I am afraid - will we won't be able to give jimmy's ultimate dream a reality?! one user named
339:. Whether a source is produced by a government is not one of the criteria for reliability. The scientific fact and findings you are talking about ar not generally presented in television, which is a medium of entertainment, not of scholarship. Furthermore, since wikipedia is not a democracy, we have rules and policies regulating exactly the ways in which information can be added to articles - it requires discussion and arguments - not editwarring. You have not complied with those policies - rather
1553:
here, and I expect that you'll feel embarrassed by your own conduct when you do so. If you then decide to post a statement showing that you understand why we do not include fringe theories based on youtube videos or BBC documentaries, and that you understand why you were blocked, then I promise that I will seriously consider unblocking you. Not before. Meanwhile, good luck with your other projects that you mention.
1311:
395:, when I was a student. One of his daughters had beautiful curly red hair, and he told me it was a sign that he had Jesus or one of the disciples as an ancestor. One could write a perfectly respectable article on it as a well known fringe theory, with the added interest that there are probably academic sources from the Indian subcontinent that examine it as a folk belief.
885:
approach that any established scholar would be embarrassed to say or write. The video certainly is not aimed at professional scholars. Frankly, to use this as a source is an insult to scholarship. An insult to scholarship, period. An insult to scholarship in any country and in any language. For you to use it as a source is to insult us and to try to humiliate us.
1208:
826:
you have no personal interest in. If you have no personal interest, you are unlikely to violate this basic rule of
Knowledge (XXG), and you will gain valuable experience in how our policies apply and how to collaborate, and you will help build our encyclopedia. Isn't that what you want to do? Help write a great encyclopedia? Well, go to the article on
2222:
2023:. Even if it were "The sun rises in the east" it would require a reference to be included if another editor challenged it and removed it. It is never ok to editwar to insert any claim, sourced or unsourced no matter how commonsensical it might be. It is always the burden of the person who adds material to supply those sources when challenged to do so.
2311:
1603:, I am happy to see atleast there is someone in wiki project who (may appear irregularly) can think independently and can judge without prejudice. I am sure there are many, but they are too busy with their own field and seldom get times to contribute. In 2004, one of my friend from UK, who was then part of the core wiki team, introduced me with
622:
means you can edit but it also means any of the thousands of editors can revert your edit. In fact, it is a virtual inevitability that any editor who has worked here for any length of time will have been reverted t some point - I have been reverted countless times and I have even been blocked a few times. So what?
621:
Wikiglobaleditor, you may have been humbled by having your edits reverted, but you were not humiliated - "humiliated" suggests that you take it personally. Working at
Wikipedi is a humbling experience for all of us, and you should not take that personally. This being the encyclopedia anyone can edit
525:
No. This is the
English Knowledge (XXG), and rightly or wrongly our primary focus is the mainstream view of the English speaking world, which does place it's emphasis in a particular way. There is an article to be written about the view of Jesus in India, and it doesn't have to be fringe in the way
2243:
is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us
1552:
Slrubenstein told you not to discuss your personal views but stick to discussing how to improve the article. Going into a fit over being reminded to follow policy doesn't suggest that you should be editing at this point. PErhaps in a few days you'll be calm enough to go back and reread the exchanges
1503:
to discuss on talk pages. Apparently
Wikiglobaleditor is blind to our policies; being blind, when I tell him we need to discuss the kinds fo things our policies require, he simply sees nothing and infers that he cannot discuss anything. This only proves (1) that he does not care about our policies
1160:
Be that as it may, you have no idea what my personal beliefs about Jesus are. I genuinely wonder what it is that I wrote that reveals to you what I believe about Jesus. I have no arguments to make, and while you have not presented any of your own arguments, the fact remains that
Knowledge (XXG) is
775:
project. We work only by working together. Since we are strangers to one another (I might live in the same town as you, or on the other side of the world, you do not know) we can collaborate only by working within the framework of these policies. If you edit without bothering to read them, or read
746:
one of its articles, right? Well, I assume the best and thus assume you did this. But just in case out of some kind of disrespect, you did not - I have added a welcome template at the top of this page with all the links to policies, guidelines and essays about working here successfully that we all
419:
clearly mentions that "... for writers and editors of
Knowledge (XXG) articles to write about controversial ideas in a neutral manner, it is of vital importance that they simply restate what is said by independent secondary sources of reasonable reliability and quality." How can you say the work of
1102:
can become a
Wikipolicy expert, because all of our policies are easy to access, we operate with complete transparency, people who have no higher degrees, indeed, people who have no formal education, can read our policies and learn how to contribute here. Even you can - all you need to do is follow
2174:
poetry would just rightly fit in" (which are fancruft - I agree) - I think there is no problem in his edits. You could have pinpoint these problems of his edits to him - that'd surely help him more than blocking him. Yes, it is unencyclopedic to write "Singh is India's most prolific live performer
825:
You seem to have personal views about Jesus. here is some friendly advice: do not edit articles relating to Jesus. It is a rule here that none of us put our own views into articles. This takes self-discipline many people need time to develop. One way to develop this is to work on articles that
737:
relevant is the fact that we provide accounts of mainstream scholarship (whether it come out of
Pakistan or China or Germany or any other country). We only use reliable sources, and we do not use fringe views. You seem to be unaware of our most basic policies. There is a link to all of these at
679:
dominate Knowledge (XXG). When she clarified about English sources, she is being only pragmatic _ at English Knowledge (XXG), editors will inevitably be people who can read and write English. This will include people from all over the world, since countries like Nigeria and India are part of the
309:
is NOT reliable - then what is RELIABLE according to your prudent discretion ?? Knowledge (XXG) is not about holding some religious belief â itâs all about scientific and historical facts and findings, and presenting the truth in front of the world community â which it is created for. For disputed
1880:
I would like to think that we can resolve this. Can we take a second look at what happened? I believe it was your first attempt at a major content edit, and it may be that the whole thing is down to a mismatch of expectations, and - to be fair - a misunderstanding of some policy on your part, and
1615:
just stated with threatening and abusing me, (Sorry I deleted his post from my page) actually he has done the first revert, and several after that. I told him repeatedly (also to others) that If you were not agree with the researches presented in those references - you could raise a debate in the
1077:
you have no right to twist Wiki-policies according to your own favor. Being a wiki-policy expert - will NEVER make you a historian or scholar, truth shall always prevail, and I am NOT afraid of being blocked by naive people, as I know it quite well how to raise the truth to the appropriate forum.
884:
But i can tell you right now that a You-Tube video is a no-starter. I watched the first part of that video by the way and I can tell you that any real scholar - whether in India, Pakistan, China, or the United States - could possibly take it seriously. Each sentence reveals a sloppy, unscholarly
548:
connecting and common official language of that subcontinent? Do you have any idea of the number of the population of the Indian subcontinent who can speak/read/write in English? That number will be more than the double of the western "English speaking world" you are referring to. The question is
420:
all scholars is NOT reliable because they are from India. Documentaries are not the source of the data I inserted, they refer to the hundreds of old manuscript, inscription, archaeological proofs, and books written by scholars not from India - but mainly from western countries. How can you ignore
357:
The Government of India was not established, nor is it qualified, to judge the history of early Christianity, 1st century Judea or Galilee, or Jesus. Ditto for the BBC. You ask what is a reliable source on a scholarly topic? Simple answer: books by established scholars (e.g. at established major
1525:
since 2004, Even you don't know what is my contribution as a Editor - just go through them - that'll give you some glimpse - whether or not I am aware of Knowledge (XXG)'s aim and policies. Anyway, I don't want to argue with you people - because now I have to report my findings on wiki editorial
1097:
Being a wiki-policy expert does not make me a scholar; having a PhD. makes me a scholar - but it does not matter whether I have three PhDs or whether I never finished high school. One need not be a scholar to edit Knowledge (XXG), and indeed, no scholar should use Knowledge (XXG) as a place to
1261:
Wikiglobaleditor, it seems apparent from the above that you do not understand what the problems were with your edits, and you seem fully determined to repeat them. I have therefore blocked you indefinitely to pre-emptively prevent disruption to the project. At the point where you can show an
588:
The way I was treated and humiliated here - I am doubtful that in future whether I'll make any voluntary contribution to Knowledge (XXG) - unless I get apology from appropriate authority. As far as life of Jesus is concerned - I'll take it to the much broader international community including
2169:
of his words can make it absolutely encyclopedic - rather than completely reverting his edits or Blocking him... e.g. if these words can be removed like: "will forever remain popular.", "put across the wording in such a manner as if the poet himself is singing it", "His melodious voice and
1655:
is somewhat of personal nature, and may contain information that may not be suitable to be put in a public page. But as wiki doesn't have a channel for personal communication, nor it has the option to restrict the visibility of the Talk Page, I had to put the above communication here. --
358:
research universities) recently published by major university presses (Chicago, California, Duke, Cambridge, etc) or articles published by similar PhDs in well-established peer-reviewed journal articles. Just go to a library and read. When you have read enough you will know something.
985:
Bubbalah, I wrote five paragraphs and you opt to respond only the last one? If you respoect WIkipedia and if you really want to work here, it is the first four paragraphs - the bulk of my message - that you should care about. As for the fifth paragraph, I was expressing my views, but
343:
forcibly attempted to insert text into an article, without concern for the arguments of the editors telling you that it was not up to our standards. If you wish to edit here you must read, understand and follow our policies. That is the only way a collaborative encyclopedia can work.
1835:
your account. Note that it does not mean I do support (or not) any of your edits or sources on the article Jesus; nor I think Elen of the Roads as anything to be ashamed of. It simply menas that I think the extension from 72 hours to indef was hasty; that the whole thing was too
1103:
all of the well-intentioned and constructive advice you have been offered, by me and by others. That you prefer to argue with other people rather than use this time to read our policies, so that you could edit without getting into easily avoidable problems, is truly mysterious.
771:? Frankly, what you have written most recently suggests that you have not bothered to do this. Or, if you actually have read these policies, then you are willfully disregarding them. Either way shows a tremendous lack of respect for your fellow editors. Knowledge (XXG) is a
504:
Jesus is the first ever known personality, who connected east with west with his prudence, his unparalleled charisma, and his message of "Love". He equally belongs to east & west. Any article on him should have both the eastern and western views, then only it may be called
898:
Again you are asserting your personal views on those researches which documented in those videos. Your "prejudicial" clearly evident by this statement that "You seem to have personal views about Jesus..." - watching those documentary gave you the feel - that those reflects my
440:. Before making comments here none of you gone though the documentaries - I am sure, because it takes atleast 1 hour to watch these information and cross-check the references mentioned there - but my edits were reverted and I was blocked within few minutes. I simply
1846:(thank you). I hope you may enjoy it here, Wikiglobaleditor. I do not see any reason for you to restrain from editing wherever you feel like it, as long as you keep policy and guidelines in mind, Elen highlighted a few below, for myself I only remind you that the
2164:
No, I didn't advice him to "ignore" your suggestions, see I am the first one who told you to convince him regarding the 'years active' issue. I agree there is a touch of little bit fancruft in his edit, but the information is NOT totally wrong. Just by removing
834:
or some article on a relatively neglected topic. Then, research the topic following our policies for research, and then contribute to the article following our policies for writing. Your work would be appreciated and you could be proud about having made real
281:
Three experienced editors are disagreeing that the information you wish to add is reliably sourced. Reverting half a dozen times, accusing them of bias, reporting them for vandalism and trying to get the page locked to your version is not the way to deal with
1161:
not the appropriate venue for either of us to be arguing over our beliefs about Jesus. My only argument is that when editing articles and writing on talk pages, we should follow WP policy. So far you have not offered any argument against that either.
1975:
continues to add unsourced material and advertising, and edit war to keep it in the article, he's going to end up blocked for longer next time. Advising him to ignore the administrators is just about the worst thing you could do for him. Bear in mind
317:, and truth can't be suppressed by numbers. I just wanted to voluntarily contribute to Knowledge (XXG) by updating a page based on the latest researches of the renowned historians & scholars from different parts of the world - and if that leads to
2149:
are also all statements that require a source if they are to remain in the article. By advising the editor to ignore this advice, you are increasing the likelihood that he will make further editing violations, which may result in him being blocked.
1753:
Wikiglobaleditor, quite frankly your statements of friendship with Jimmy Walles are all but impressive. I could as well claim I'm friends with the Portuguese Prime-Minister. That is easy. I am not friends of the Portuguese Prime Minister (I bet I am
1730:
I see a warning. But you said that his post was threatening and abusive. How is this threatening and abusive? You do not have to answer here, you can follow the reguylar channels for making a Wiki etiquette complaint and seek redress if you wish.
2036:
Why don't we give him some time to add it, blocking is never a way to encourage a contributor, better to discuss it in the talk pages. BTW.. if "The sun rises in the east" was challenged - what reference shall we provide???? is there any ?? -
1054:
on the Jesus talk page or any WP space, you risk being blocked again. The purpose of talk pages is to discuss improvements to the article: to assess the significance of views and the reliability of scholars. It is NOT for you to use as a
1940:
If for the sake of argument lets presume that the first 72 hours block was somewhat justified, but you should be ashamed for your hasty decision (may be subdued by your known editors) for the indef block. If you don't feel ashamed for the
1772:
Thanks for your reply. and... oops... I just shared one of my experiences - and you do have full right to disbelieve that anyway. I will keep contributing to Wiki-Projects in whatever way I can in my 'limited capacity', as you know
267:
Hello W. Thanks for your thanks. It is no problem at all - there are so many guidelines and regulations around here. I've been editing over 6 years and there are still things that I am learning. Cheers and happy editing.
2110:...created a landmark in the punjabi music and will forever remain popular. His soulful singing of "Asa Tan Joban Rute Marna" ( I am going to die in the season of youth) justified the emotion with which the poet wrote...
2292:
I'm dropping you a note because you filled out the New Page Patrol survey, and indicated you'd be interested in being contacted about follow-up work. This is to notify you that we've finally released both the
543:
What do you mean by English speaking world? Do you think today English is limited to England or USA and Australia only? Do you have any idea of the importance of English in Indian subcontinent? English is the
2183:
is that much stubborn, I noted that he listened to my advice regarding the changes in 'years active' issue (which you were agree with him)! Why won't he listen to you all - I just cant understand. -
1526:
environment to somewhere else, and that is more important. I am a busy man, cant waste enough time arguing with you all. Let's put an End here, keep me blocked for how long you want, not an issue,
509:. I just wanted to reflect this through my edits, as it was my humble tribute to this great personality of ancient times, who did many things which others can't even imagine during those days. -
1850:
is fundamental for WP's existence (or it would be impossible to edit) even if sometimes it feels like 'we lose' a dispute, and that is a clear rule, whose breach leads to a almost sure block. -
432:
is associated. Does Knowledge (XXG) give you the authority to do so? How can you make Knowledge (XXG) - which is supposed to be world's first digital heritage - a static source of data on some
1750:
Wikiglobaleditor, you're not helping (yourself) much either... And thanks for relying on me, but I'm here today, I may not be tomorrow, and surely will not be forever, nor I am any special.
490:
is conveying the current mainstream view, which is primarily western. You are right about that. Write an article about this really very longstanding view held on the Indian subcontinent.
1499:
said that Wikiglobaleditor is "NOT to discuss anything." (I will put aside for now the fact that he insults me by lying about what I wrote.) In fact I specified what kinds of things we
28:
607:
An apology for sanctioning you for breaking the rules seems unlikely. You are only blocked for 72 hours. After that time, you can discuss it on the talkpage, just don't edit war.
1997:
That's not always the case Elen, (may be I shouldn't have put that in his talk page), but "Sun rises in the east" - doesn't require a citation, same is true for personality like
526:
that spoon bending is fringe. he problem is that the mythos of the subcontinent has been taken up by authors in the west with their own axes to grind, and this is what makes it
1620:
in the main article the latest researches and finding from some independent secondary sources of reasonable reliability and quality, to present the controversial ideas in a
444:
in the main article the latest researches and finding from some independent secondary sources of reasonable reliability and quality, to present the controversial ideas in a
1675:
Knowledge (XXG) values transparency; this is part of Jimmy Wales' dream, and ours too. But if you want privacy instead, you certainly have a choice, you can e-mail Nabla.
1570:
have any personal view, and the way I was continuously misquoted - that's really ridiculous. Just read the full story before making any comment on behalf of your friends.
593:
page to those 'experienced' editors of English Knowledge (XXG) - as I am unable to do so due to this blocking and they unilaterally showing their 'knowledge' over their.
2001:
who has immense fan-following throughout that Indian subcontinent. Just Google with his name and you'll find thousands of references, and yes, many of them complies to
2298:
1572:
In-fact I don't want any further argument on this, so please don't post anything here, and provoke me to replying same thing again and again wasting my valuable time.
1404:- just in the previous post you assured me that "...You are only blocked for 72 hours. After that time, you can discuss it on the talkpage...", but when the user
2121:...He would sing all the songs with the simple note and emotional touch in it and put across the wording in such a manner as if the poet himself is singing it....
1351:
321:- then I am sorry to say, Knowledge (XXG) will fail to be a reliable source itself very soon - and knowledgable people will keep distance from editing Wikis. -
2301:, which sets out how we plan to work with the community on this. Please give both a read, and leave any comments or suggestions you have on the talkpage, on
1468:
template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.
1436:
I see no sign of you understanding what the problem has been with your editing. If you want to be unblocked, this request isn't the way to achieve that.
36:
108:
198:
222:
375:. Such views, when they do warrant any mention at all, warrant only separate articles with nothing but a "see also" mention in the main article. --
1346:
1453:
1243:
1098:
publish their own scholarly research - per policy. But Wikiglobal editor, you know what the great thing is about being a wiki-policy expert?
51:
or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the
1414:
Bravo....!!! So you are playing with your administrator privileges and that should be known to the Knowledge (XXG) & World community. -
2269:
1440:
915:
page very soon, lets argue over there, My Talk page is not a good place for discussing on the the life of a person of the stature like
47:
41:
131:
1888:, and believed that you were in the right in continuing to add the disputed information and reference, because you believe it was
48:
589:
historians and scientists in a much broader forum. As far as Knowledge (XXG) is concerned I will just make my voice heard in the
1070:
Now you show your exact true character and your real intention, that is to suppress facts and threatening others - when you are
149:
2072:
reference at all? its about the sun's apparent motions across the sky as we see from earth - which is called the phenomenon of
1223:
103:
1437:
1365:
1227:
203:
42:
1892:. Although there was some discussion on the talkpage of the article, you continued to add the information, and breached
675:
she meant that that "European" views (I personally find "Western" and "Eastern" to be meaningless in this generic sense)
227:
1411:
NOT to discuss anything even on the TALK-PAGE of jesus, instead of taking action against him - you readily blocked me!!!
1813:
with my point of view, you can unblock me any time you wish, but I shouldn't be restrained to put my references in the
1324:
1215:
154:
2155:
2059:
1985:
1928:
1484:
1299:
1251:
763:? Have you respected the comments many volunteer editors have provided you, directing you to look at our policies in
612:
579:
534:
495:
400:
287:
1521:
words, how you threaten and insulted me. You don't have any idea who I am, how I associated in the wiki-projects and
1318:
1323:
Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the
1755:
748:
314:
178:
98:
93:
1842:; and that you had some mostly fine edits outside the Jesus article over the previous months. I also note that
232:
428:
stick to a rigid point based on your prejudice - simply because this article is about a person - with whom a
1805:
Haha, no.. its not like that... perhaps you didn't see the last section of my talk page, where I replied to
553:
it was discovered) or will you clinch to static religious facts - when a encyclopedic article is concerned?
464:
make you a historian or scholar, truth shall always prevail, you can only make some delay to appear it in a
2248:
If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
1720:
1702:
1517:
Again lying after lying, anyone who can read English can scroll above and can see what exactly you told in
183:
2325:
2268:
You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see
2151:
2055:
1981:
1924:
1806:
1736:
1680:
1509:
1480:
1401:
1295:
1247:
1166:
1062:
890:
608:
575:
530:
491:
396:
363:
283:
2116:
was attempting to edit war into the article, is not axiomatic, even if everyone in India agrees with it.
1287:
238:
188:
2273:
2184:
2095:
2038:
2006:
1950:
1818:
1791:
OK. Looks like you do not wish to be unblocked, fine, your call. If you ever wish to, say so, please. -
1778:
1657:
1633:
1581:
1533:
1415:
1329:
1082:
920:
594:
558:
510:
473:
371:
Also, your edits, while referenced, are not in line with the mainstream views, and as such qualify as a
322:
1689:
You regret that you deleted History2007's post. But WP is 100% transparent so we know what he posted:
244:
126:
2090:
of this planet can prove (or can give any citation) that "sun rises in the east" - because its an "an
1716:
1698:
1612:
392:
2113:
1972:
1909:
2180:
273:
1977:
1901:
1712:
1625:
1477:
1279:
527:
449:
416:
372:
2171:
573:
If you edit war to put that back in the article again, you will get blocked for a longer period.
1283:
1275:
1271:
571:
OK, let me make it blindingly obvious, as it's obviously not going in by collegial discussion.
2251:
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.
2321:
2244:
in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.
1916:
and had a discussion about your sources. Unfortunately, you gave the impression that you were
1732:
1676:
1505:
1405:
1162:
1058:
886:
359:
1913:
1838:
1629:
752:
453:
2028:
1558:
1462:
1233:
349:
63:
52:
2294:
2240:
1917:
1905:
1897:
1893:
1885:
1847:
1291:
760:
1980:- the responsibility for sourcing information lies with the person who wants to add it. --
1855:
1796:
1763:
2002:
1267:
336:
415:
I cant understand why you all are failed to judge this fact as a neutral point of view!
387:
Yes indeed. I first heard the Kashmir theory 30 years ago from my landlord who was an
269:
1889:
1263:
756:
2108:
OK, let's make this slightly clearer, since you don't seem to be getting it at all.
1949:
page - then let it be like this, I'll deal it some other time in some other way. --
1476:
Note that I have requested a review of this block on the administrators' noticeboard
193:
1998:
2329:
2192:
2159:
2103:
2063:
2051:
2046:
2031:
2024:
2014:
1989:
1958:
1932:
1859:
1826:
1800:
1786:
1767:
1739:
1724:
1706:
1683:
1665:
1641:
1604:
1589:
1561:
1554:
1541:
1522:
1512:
1488:
1443:
1423:
1303:
1255:
1169:
1090:
1065:
928:
893:
616:
602:
583:
566:
538:
518:
499:
481:
404:
382:
366:
352:
345:
330:
291:
276:
67:
59:
2133:
1923:
Would you - having read the policies quoted above - agree with that summary? --
2125:
1946:
1851:
1814:
1792:
1759:
1652:
1600:
912:
590:
335:
You can find out what we consider reliable sources by reading our policy:
2257:
2074:
827:
388:
2221:
549:
whether you will show respect to the historical facts (irrespective of
1896:- which is there to prevent chaos. You tried reporting History2007 to
831:
1504:
and (2) cares only to soap-box and push his personal point of view.
747:
assume any new editor has taken the time to read. Have you gone to
2140:
2136:
1777:
is not the only way around to be part of this great project. :) -
1262:
administrator that you understand that Knowledge (XXG) is based on
2091:
1694:
487:
1532:, atleast this much honesty I can expect from you - can't IÂ ? --
1043:
I have expressed NO personal beliefs or opinions about Jesus. I
1396:
Fine, now you showed how prompt you can abuse others discarding
2263:
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.
2082:
claim that "sun rises in the east", nor it tells anything even
1529:
but please don't delete any of your comments from my talk page
1711:
There is need for a block here, based on clear disregard for
55:. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.
2220:
2129:
1309:
1206:
738:
the Knowledge (XXG) main page. Surely you took the time to
2118:...would remain his magnum opus for the punjabi diaspora...
1945:
block and for restraining me to put my references in the
1450:
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please
1470:
Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
1294:, is the way to edit here, then you can be unblocked. --
751:? Have you bothered to read our core content policies,
2320:
It's awesome to finally get to start work on this! :).
1843:
1747:
Slrubenstein, what is the point in poking? Please stop.
1379:
1375:
1369:
1360:
1356:
1342:
1338:
1334:
2179:
most prolific live performers ever. And I don't think
911:
for those researchers. I am gonna put my views in the
1317:
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an
460:- being a wiki-admin or wiki-policy expert - will
2021:whenever another editor has challenged the claim'
1884:I think it's fair to say that you misunderstood
2147:...India's most prolific live performer ever...
1908:, but all that did was highlight that you were
1226:. If you would like to be unblocked, you may
1920:, which often indicates a problematic editor.
165:
80:
19:
8:
2285:New Page Triage engagement strategy released
1050:I am WARNING you NOW: if you put your views
1912:. A better course would have been to go to
1817:page and start a new discussion there. --
776:them and ignore them, you insult all of us.
742:about Knowledge (XXG) before you tried to
486:Write an article about it. The article
2094:truth". Hope now its clear to you ! -
1693:Stop reverting multiple editors now on
671:I respectfully do not agree with Ellen
1047:you that this is not what WP is for.
907:you watched those references and your
206:â a Wizard to help you create articles
2126:] poetry would just rightly fit in...
1844:Elen of the Roads is not against this
1651:The above communication addressed to
7:
2143:are known to be his avid admirers.
2112:which is one of the statements that
1074:defeated through arguments. Listen,
313:Knowledge (XXG) is not a Democracy,
99:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
1881:some unhelpful phrasing on mine.
1566:Please put an end here, please. I
109:Intuitive guide to Knowledge (XXG)
14:
1270:not on individual perceptions of
458:never change the historical facts
2309:
2216:
2175:ever" - but no doubt that he is
1914:the reliable sources noticeboard
1809:explaining my arguments. If you
1697:, or be blocked. Is that clear?
424:and insult their researches and
46:
40:
2297:about the project and also the
1886:the Bold, Revert, Discuss cycle
903:view!!! - this clearly reveals
223:Contributing to Knowledge (XXG)
2068:Dear Elen, have you ever read
1959:23:08, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
1933:20:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
1900:but what he was doing was not
1787:18:24, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
1768:21:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
1740:00:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
1725:09:30, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
1707:09:16, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
1684:09:18, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
1666:06:23, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
1642:20:00, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
1590:19:50, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1562:18:49, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1542:18:30, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1513:12:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1489:11:35, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1444:11:37, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1424:11:27, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1304:11:04, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1256:10:55, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1170:19:33, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1091:10:39, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
1066:10:02, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
929:07:13, 19 September 2011 (UTC)
894:18:05, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
617:13:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
603:05:14, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
584:23:09, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
567:21:19, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
539:20:21, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
519:19:38, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
500:19:06, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
482:18:14, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
405:16:24, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
383:15:51, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
367:14:41, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
353:14:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
331:11:44, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
292:11:04, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
1:
680:English speaking world. But
436:article - only because it is
301:If the documentaries made by
76:
68:05:32, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
25:Hello, Wikiglobaleditor, and
15:
2276:13:53, 26 October 2011 (UTC)
2239:Hello Wikiglobaleditor! The
2193:14:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
2160:10:58, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
2104:04:39, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
2064:00:15, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
2047:00:02, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
2032:23:49, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
2015:23:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
1990:22:53, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
1904:. You also tried to request
37:sign your name on talk pages
2305:talkpage, or in my inbox -
1860:13:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
1827:12:58, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
1801:22:16, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
1321:, who declined the request.
1224:abuse of editing privileges
199:New contributors' help page
29:Welcome to Knowledge (XXG)!
2345:
2052:All about the sun's motion
1274:, that it has policies on
1242:, but you should read the
179:Frequently asked questions
2330:02:41, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
2310:
1715:after multiple warnings.
1454:guide to appealing blocks
1244:guide to appealing blocks
277:23:02, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
239:Knowledge (XXG) etiquette
150:How to develop an article
2188:
2124:His melodious voice and
2099:
2042:
2010:
1954:
1822:
1782:
1661:
1637:
1585:
1537:
1419:
1086:
924:
682:none of this is relevant
598:
562:
514:
477:
326:
2274:Global message delivery
1918:crusading for the truth
189:Where to ask a question
118:Finding your way around
2225:
2213:New Page Patrol survey
1402:User:Elen_of_the_Roads
1314:
1280:outside the mainstream
1264:verifiable information
1211:
2295:initial documentation
2224:
1894:the three revert rule
1366:change block settings
1313:
1238:Your reason here ~~~~
1210:
1876:Can we resolve this?
1574:Let's treat this as
1284:collegial discussion
1278:information that is
393:Mirpur, Azad Kashmir
263:Thanks for your note
132:Department directory
2299:engagement strategy
1967:You are not helping
1519:Bold and Underlined
1230:by adding the text
470:particular website!
305:or News media like
303:Government of India
35:Please remember to
2230:New page patrol â
2226:
2172:Shiv Kumar Batalvi
1315:
1212:
233:Join a WikiProject
104:How to edit a page
53:edit summary field
2282:
2281:
2277:
2232:Survey Invitation
2152:Elen of the Roads
2056:Elen of the Roads
1982:Elen of the Roads
1925:Elen of the Roads
1807:Elen of the Roads
1624:according to the
1577:END OF DISCUSSION
1481:Elen of the Roads
1406:User:Slrubenstein
1296:Elen of the Roads
1248:Elen of the Roads
1228:appeal this block
1222:from editing for
609:Elen of the Roads
576:Elen of the Roads
531:Elen of the Roads
492:Elen of the Roads
448:according to the
397:Elen of the Roads
284:Elen of the Roads
260:
259:
256:
255:
252:
251:
162:
161:
127:Table of contents
75:
74:
2336:
2316:
2314:
2313:
2312:
2267:
2217:
2185:Wikiglobaleditor
2096:Wikiglobaleditor
2039:Wikiglobaleditor
2007:Wikiglobaleditor
1951:Wikiglobaleditor
1819:Wikiglobaleditor
1779:Wikiglobaleditor
1658:Wikiglobaleditor
1634:Wikiglobaleditor
1613:User:History2007
1582:Wikiglobaleditor
1534:Wikiglobaleditor
1467:
1461:
1416:Wikiglobaleditor
1385:
1383:
1372:
1354:
1352:deleted contribs
1330:Wikiglobaleditor
1312:
1292:personal attacks
1268:reliable sources
1241:
1209:
1083:Wikiglobaleditor
921:Wikiglobaleditor
769:reliable sources
595:Wikiglobaleditor
559:Wikiglobaleditor
511:Wikiglobaleditor
474:Wikiglobaleditor
430:religious belief
380:
323:Wikiglobaleditor
228:Community Portal
214:How you can help
166:
141:Editing articles
81:
77:
50:
44:
20:
16:
2344:
2343:
2339:
2338:
2337:
2335:
2334:
2333:
2308:
2306:
2287:
2235:
2215:
2019:It is the case
1969:
1906:page protection
1878:
1756:one degree away
1473:
1465:
1459:
1458:, then use the
1447:
1427:
1400:the arguments.
1373:
1363:
1349:
1332:
1325:blocking policy
1310:
1258:
1231:
1207:
1204:
749:WP:Five Pillars
466:particular page
376:
315:WP:NOTDEMOCRACY
265:
215:
171:
155:Manual of Style
142:
119:
86:
85:Getting started
71:
58:Happy editing!
12:
11:
5:
2342:
2340:
2286:
2283:
2280:
2279:
2265:
2262:
2253:
2252:
2249:
2237:
2228:
2214:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2205:
2204:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2199:
2198:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2141:Gursharan Kaur
2137:Manmohan Singh
2134:Prime Minister
2114:User:Simon5761
1973:User:Simon5761
1968:
1965:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1868:
1867:
1866:
1865:
1864:
1863:
1862:
1751:
1748:
1728:
1727:
1709:
1687:
1686:
1669:
1668:
1645:
1644:
1622:neutral manner
1597:
1596:
1595:
1594:
1593:
1592:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1544:
1492:
1491:
1448:
1434:
1430:Decline reason
1408:threatened me
1394:
1390:Request reason
1387:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1213:You have been
1205:
1203:
1202:September 2011
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1191:
1190:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1181:
1180:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1175:
1174:
1173:
1172:
1131:
1130:
1129:
1128:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1121:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1116:
1115:
1114:
1113:
1112:
1111:
1110:
1109:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1095:
1094:
1093:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1008:
1007:
1006:
1005:
1004:
1003:
1002:
1001:
1000:
999:
998:
997:
996:
995:
994:
993:
992:
991:
990:
989:
988:
987:
956:
955:
954:
953:
952:
951:
950:
949:
948:
947:
946:
945:
944:
943:
942:
941:
940:
939:
938:
937:
936:
935:
934:
933:
932:
931:
859:
858:
857:
856:
855:
854:
853:
852:
851:
850:
849:
848:
847:
846:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
839:
838:
837:
836:
835:contributions.
800:
799:
798:
797:
796:
795:
794:
793:
792:
791:
790:
789:
788:
787:
786:
785:
784:
783:
782:
781:
780:
779:
778:
777:
708:
707:
706:
705:
704:
703:
702:
701:
700:
699:
698:
697:
696:
695:
694:
693:
692:
691:
690:
689:
688:
687:
686:
685:
646:
645:
644:
643:
642:
641:
640:
639:
638:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
446:neutral manner
413:
412:
411:
410:
409:
408:
407:
355:
311:
264:
261:
258:
257:
254:
253:
250:
249:
248:
247:
241:
235:
230:
225:
217:
216:
213:
210:
209:
208:
207:
204:Article Wizard
201:
196:
191:
186:
181:
173:
172:
169:
163:
160:
159:
158:
157:
152:
144:
143:
140:
137:
136:
135:
134:
129:
121:
120:
117:
114:
113:
112:
111:
106:
101:
96:
88:
87:
84:
73:
72:
23:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2341:
2332:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2318:
2315:wikimedia.org
2304:
2300:
2296:
2290:
2284:
2278:
2275:
2271:
2264:
2261:
2260:to take part.
2259:
2256:Please click
2250:
2247:
2246:
2245:
2242:
2236:
2234:
2233:
2223:
2219:
2218:
2212:
2194:
2190:
2186:
2182:
2178:
2173:
2168:
2163:
2162:
2161:
2157:
2153:
2148:
2144:
2142:
2139:and his wife
2138:
2135:
2131:
2127:
2122:
2119:
2115:
2111:
2107:
2106:
2105:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2089:
2085:
2081:
2077:
2076:
2071:
2067:
2066:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2050:
2049:
2048:
2044:
2040:
2035:
2034:
2033:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2012:
2008:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1995:
1994:
1993:
1992:
1991:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1974:
1966:
1960:
1956:
1952:
1948:
1944:
1939:
1938:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1934:
1930:
1926:
1921:
1919:
1915:
1911:
1907:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1891:
1887:
1882:
1875:
1861:
1857:
1853:
1849:
1848:3 revert rule
1845:
1841:
1840:
1834:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1816:
1812:
1808:
1804:
1803:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1784:
1780:
1776:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1765:
1761:
1757:
1752:
1749:
1746:
1745:
1744:
1743:
1742:
1741:
1738:
1734:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1710:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1685:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1671:
1670:
1667:
1663:
1659:
1654:
1650:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1639:
1635:
1631:
1627:
1623:
1619:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1599:
1598:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1578:
1573:
1569:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1560:
1556:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1548:
1543:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1524:
1520:
1516:
1515:
1514:
1511:
1507:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1475:
1474:
1472:
1471:
1464:
1457:
1455:
1446:
1445:
1442:
1439:
1433:
1431:
1426:
1425:
1421:
1417:
1413:
1412:
1407:
1403:
1399:
1393:
1391:
1386:
1381:
1377:
1371:
1367:
1362:
1358:
1353:
1348:
1344:
1343:global blocks
1340:
1339:active blocks
1336:
1331:
1326:
1322:
1320:
1319:administrator
1305:
1301:
1297:
1293:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1260:
1259:
1257:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1239:
1235:
1229:
1225:
1221:
1218:
1217:
1201:
1171:
1168:
1164:
1159:
1158:
1157:
1156:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1143:
1142:
1141:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1134:
1133:
1132:
1101:
1096:
1092:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1079:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1064:
1060:
1057:
1056:
1053:
1046:
1042:
1041:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1030:
1029:
1028:
1027:
1026:
1025:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
1016:
1015:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
977:
976:
975:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
968:
967:
966:
965:
964:
963:
962:
961:
960:
959:
958:
957:
930:
926:
922:
918:
914:
910:
909:respect level
906:
902:
897:
896:
895:
892:
888:
883:
882:
881:
880:
879:
878:
877:
876:
875:
874:
873:
872:
871:
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
864:
863:
862:
861:
860:
833:
829:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
817:
816:
815:
814:
813:
812:
811:
810:
809:
808:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
801:
774:
773:collaborative
770:
767:views and on
766:
762:
758:
754:
750:
745:
741:
736:
732:
731:
730:
729:
728:
727:
726:
725:
724:
723:
722:
721:
720:
719:
718:
717:
716:
715:
714:
713:
712:
711:
710:
709:
683:
678:
674:
670:
669:
668:
667:
666:
665:
664:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
657:
656:
655:
654:
653:
652:
651:
650:
649:
648:
647:
620:
619:
618:
614:
610:
606:
605:
604:
600:
596:
592:
587:
586:
585:
581:
577:
574:
570:
569:
568:
564:
560:
556:
552:
547:
542:
541:
540:
536:
532:
529:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
503:
502:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
418:
414:
406:
402:
398:
394:
390:
386:
385:
384:
379:
374:
370:
369:
368:
365:
361:
356:
354:
351:
347:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
299:
298:
297:
296:
295:
294:
293:
289:
285:
279:
278:
275:
271:
262:
246:
242:
240:
236:
234:
231:
229:
226:
224:
221:
220:
219:
218:
212:
211:
205:
202:
200:
197:
195:
192:
190:
187:
185:
182:
180:
177:
176:
175:
174:
168:
167:
164:
156:
153:
151:
148:
147:
146:
145:
139:
138:
133:
130:
128:
125:
124:
123:
122:
116:
115:
110:
107:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
89:
83:
82:
79:
78:
70:
69:
65:
61:
56:
54:
49:
43:
38:
33:
32:
31:
30:
22:
21:
18:
17:
2322:Okeyes (WMF)
2319:
2302:
2291:
2288:
2266:
2255:
2254:
2238:
2231:
2229:
2227:
2176:
2166:
2146:
2128:
2123:
2120:
2117:
2109:
2087:
2083:
2079:
2073:
2069:
2020:
1999:Jagjit Singh
1970:
1942:
1922:
1910:edit warring
1883:
1879:
1837:
1832:
1810:
1774:
1733:Slrubenstein
1729:
1688:
1677:Slrubenstein
1672:
1648:
1621:
1617:
1608:
1576:
1575:
1571:
1567:
1528:
1527:
1518:
1506:Slrubenstein
1500:
1496:
1469:
1451:
1449:
1435:
1429:
1428:
1410:
1409:
1397:
1395:
1389:
1388:
1361:creation log
1328:
1316:
1286:to reach an
1237:
1220:indefinitely
1219:
1214:
1163:Slrubenstein
1099:
1076:
1075:
1071:
1059:Slrubenstein
1051:
1049:
1048:
1044:
916:
908:
904:
900:
887:Slrubenstein
772:
768:
764:
743:
739:
734:
681:
676:
672:
572:
555:Ask yourself
554:
550:
545:
506:
469:
465:
461:
457:
445:
441:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
377:
360:Slrubenstein
340:
318:
306:
302:
280:
266:
170:Getting help
94:Introduction
57:
39:by clicking
34:
27:
26:
24:
1717:History2007
1699:History2007
1605:Jimmy Wales
1523:Jimmy Wales
1288:agreed form
1282:, and that
1272:"the truth"
1052:about Jesus
422:all of them
373:fringe view
2289:Hey guys!
2270:NPP Survey
2177:one of the
2078:. It does
1947:Talk:Jesus
1890:verifiable
1833:unblocking
1815:Talk:Jesus
1357:filter log
1072:completely
913:Talk:Jesus
591:Talk:Jesus
507:mainstream
434:particular
378:Blanchardb
194:Help pages
184:Cheatsheet
2181:Simon5761
2092:axiomatic
2086:to that.
1978:WP:BURDEN
1902:vandalism
1713:WP:Policy
1626:WP:FRINGE
1452:read the
1438:Fut.Perf.
1376:checkuser
1335:block log
528:WP:FRINGE
450:WP:FRINGE
438:sensitive
417:WP:FRINGE
381:-- timed
270:MarnetteD
243:Practice
2132:current
2075:Analemma
1618:restated
1609:blocking
1495:Note: I
1347:contribs
1276:handling
1236:|reason=
1055:soap-box
901:personal
828:Ferdowsi
442:restated
426:forcibly
389:Amadiyah
319:blocking
245:civility
2130:India's
2084:related
2029:snunÉw¡
2025:¡Ęaunus
1775:editing
1630:WP:NPOV
1559:snunÉw¡
1555:¡Ęaunus
1463:unblock
1370:unblock
1246:first.
1234:unblock
1216:blocked
753:WP:NPOV
454:WP:NPOV
350:snunÉw¡
346:¡Ęaunus
237:Follow
2307:okeyes
2088:No one
1898:WP:AIV
1100:Anyone
832:Carbon
765:fringe
761:WP:NOR
744:change
677:should
60:Addbot
2003:WP:RS
1943:indef
1852:Nabla
1839:bitey
1831:I am
1811:agree
1793:Nabla
1760:Nabla
1695:Jesus
1673:Note:
1653:Nabla
1649:Note:
1601:Nabla
1568:DON'T
1497:never
1456:first
1266:from
917:Jesus
740:learn
733:What
488:Jesus
468:of a
462:never
391:from
337:WP:RS
282:this.
2326:talk
2258:HERE
2189:talk
2156:talk
2145:and
2100:talk
2070:your
2060:talk
2043:talk
2011:talk
1986:talk
1955:talk
1929:talk
1856:talk
1823:talk
1797:talk
1783:talk
1764:talk
1737:Talk
1721:talk
1703:talk
1681:Talk
1662:talk
1638:talk
1628:and
1586:talk
1538:talk
1510:Talk
1501:need
1485:talk
1420:talk
1300:talk
1290:not
1252:talk
1167:Talk
1087:talk
1063:Talk
1045:told
925:talk
891:Talk
759:and
757:WP:V
613:talk
599:talk
580:talk
563:talk
551:when
546:only
535:talk
515:talk
496:talk
478:talk
452:and
401:talk
364:Talk
327:talk
288:talk
274:Talk
64:talk
2241:WMF
2167:few
2080:not
1971:If
1735:|
1679:|
1508:|
1398:all
1380:log
1327:).
1165:|
1061:|
919:-
905:how
889:|
830:or
362:|
341:you
307:BBC
45:or
2328:)
2317:.
2303:my
2272:.
2191:)
2158:)
2150:--
2102:)
2062:)
2054:--
2045:)
2013:)
2005:-
1988:)
1957:)
1931:)
1858:)
1825:)
1799:)
1785:)
1766:)
1723:)
1705:)
1664:)
1640:)
1588:)
1580:-
1540:)
1487:)
1479:.
1466:}}
1460:{{
1432::
1422:)
1392::
1374:â˘
1368:â˘
1364:â˘
1359:â˘
1355:â˘
1350:â˘
1345:â˘
1341:â˘
1337:â˘
1302:)
1254:)
1240:}}
1232:{{
1089:)
1081:-
927:)
755:,
735:is
673:if
615:)
601:)
582:)
565:)
557:-
537:)
517:)
498:)
480:)
472:-
403:)
329:)
290:)
272:|
66:)
2324:(
2187:(
2154:(
2098:(
2058:(
2041:(
2027:¡
2009:(
1984:(
1953:(
1927:(
1854:(
1821:(
1795:(
1781:(
1762:(
1719:(
1701:(
1660:(
1636:(
1584:(
1557:¡
1536:(
1483:(
1441:âź
1418:(
1384:)
1382:)
1378:(
1333:(
1298:(
1250:(
1085:(
923:(
684:.
611:(
597:(
578:(
561:(
533:(
513:(
494:(
476:(
399:(
348:¡
325:(
286:(
62:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
