User talk:Wnissen - Knowledge (XXG)

1441:

the Participant list is to function as a resource for other editors wishing to get in contact with wine project members for comments or question on Knowledge (XXG)'s wine article. The goal of this process is to try and maintain the Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Wine/Participants as current and up to date as possible with active and contributing members. Please note that this is not intended to be a negative reflection on your Knowledge (XXG) or wine related contribution and it is well known that sometimes outside life can take editors away from Knowledge (XXG) for some time. You will always be welcomed to rejoined the Wine Project should you feel that the time is right. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk or on the Wine Project talk page. Best wishes.

1463: 406: 534:“Original research that creates primary sources is not allowed. However, research that consists of collecting and organizing information from existing primary and/or secondary sources is strongly encouraged. In fact, all articles on Knowledge (XXG) should be based on information collected from primary and secondary sources. This is not ‘original research,’ it is ‘source-based research,’ and it is fundamental to writing an encyclopedia.” 2477: 2585: 2299: 2211: 1824: 1751: 1686: 1308: 1181: 2000: 2803: 1543: 2751: 1062: 958: 822: 685: 2449:

Woot woot! I'm so glad. The usual 20th century donut hole strikes again! Do you pay for the newspapers.com subscription? Any other tips on finding those sources? A distant relative once ran the post office, which doubled as a general store, and was followed home by the revenuers when she bought sugar

348:

The entire paragraph is filled with loaded and accusatory words. You want to discuss the article, do it on the talk page. I added a note to your Talk page because the Knowledge (XXG) requires a multiple notifications before users are blocked from editing. Also, I can tell who you are, but please sign

2725:

I added some honors. It is really hard to believe that a full professor at an R1, member of several committees, PI for a large grant, etc. does not qualify. She has 471 citations in the last five years. Is she a National Academy member? No. Is she clearly well above average as an academic? Yes. Look

1601:

deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note

494:

I would recommend completely ignoring categories, links, and all the Wiki-specific stuff. Let the Wiki experts take care of that stuff, they don't need wine knowledge and they're way better at it than you or I. (As an example, I accidentally put the stub statement at the top of ten of your new pages

2707:

Can I ask, in all kindness, if you are allowed to do this? She easily meets the standards of WP:PROF. To be the lead PI on a $ 3 million NSF grant is extremely, extremely prestigious, something like top 100 grants in the country. I didn't put a laundry list of the invited talks precisely because it

1440:

This is a friendly note to let you know that you have been moved to the Inactive members page of the Wine Project. Users are moved to this page when two months have passed without any Knowledge (XXG) activity or 3 months have passed without any contribution to a wine related article. The intent of

1422:

Apologies to everyone for this notification being sent out so late, events in real life prevented me from distributing it at the time, and the Wine Project's had a bit of a lull during the Northern Hemsiphere summer. But as the nights draw in, activity should pick up again, and hopefully the next

567:

It was deleted without debate (i.e., via speedy deletion) the second time around because it was a repost of an already deleted article. Let me first say that I don't agree with the result of the deletion; several participants said the content should be merged into Alcohol, which is not a bad idea,

327:

Hey, no fair using hidden HTML comments, you sneak! I checked, and American pinot noir outnumbers Burgundy in the cellar seven to four, so it's obvious where my personal feelings are as far as regular drinking. However, I have yet to hear anyone who's sampled the best of California and the best of

290:

You're quite welcome. The terminology on German wines, even as codified in 1971, is baroque, and when you get wines from before that, it's practically impossible, even for Germans. The naturwein is the one thing I'm pretty sure I understand. And don't get me started on cabinet vs. kabinett, et al.

343:

Prove it's not a neutral and relevant edit and I'll stop. So far, you haven't proved anything, except to cite it's "too long." It's a neutral edit, if you re-read it you WILL see that great pain was taken to ensure that it was reported solely based on FACT, not by anything else. It was a far more

279:

Thanks for making it clear under QmP what naturwein was. Curiously I was at a tasting of old German wines (1945/1953/1959/1967/1971/1983/1990) and did wonder what this meant, as several bottles were labelled with this. I have been a bit slack on wine entries recently and will do some more work on

359:

It had nothing to do with anonymous-type edits, though I did forget. Whoops, lol. Regardless, you point out the words, and I'll change them. That simple. Don't delete the whole article because of a few words, do some actual revision, tell me what they are, and I'll do my best to change them.

2726:

at the other people who gave the invited WST talk. A quarter of them are college presidents. Most of the rest are named chairs. I never heard of her until yesterday, I have never met her, but she's obviously top tier. If you have a suggestion about making it less promotional, I am all ears.

1836:

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

239:. I've had some concerns about the state of the article (NPOV, muddled statements), and your edit does a good job of addressing them. I just wanted to point out that you accidentally added an incomplete sentence (and I'd like to see the end of it!). -- 1763:

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

1698:

2708:

wasn't core to her research but she is regularly a featured speaker. If you want to put the page up for deletion, please do so, to unilaterally move it back into a draft is not permitted, to my knowledge. If I'm wrong about that, please let me know.

1603: 1557:, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the 415:

Ah, Didn't realize that I couldn't remove the article by blanking the vandalism. I see you've already deleted it, which is what I was trying to do. Thank you for taking care of this, I'll use {db} template thingy in the future.

524:

Hi. I earlier posted a brief review of the reseach literature titled "Alcohol and Teenagers' Brains." about which three was some discussion. It was subsequently deleted, apparently because it was seen as original research.

317:"NPOV'd a bit about Burgundy"? Why, sir, to allow remain an assertion that Burgundy produces the best Pinot is not only POV of the most heinous calibre, but an affront to every Californian and individual of good taste! ;) 2630: 2342: 2254: 1864: 1791: 1726: 1641:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 602:

and would like to invite you to join the Knowledge (XXG) WineProject. One of the task that we are currently trying to do is get Pinot Noir up to Feature Article status. We would love to have you on the Team. :)

2824:

In accordance with our policy that Knowledge (XXG) is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can

484:

I really appreciate your supportive kind words. I'll have to figure out how to add stubs and also subject categories; ventured there once unsuccessfully. I don't like to make unnecessry work for others.

2614:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2326:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 2238:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1848:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1775:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 1710:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 65:. Seeing as it's not incorrect, it's shorter than “varietal wine,” and it's more specific than “variety” by itself, I much prefer varietal as a noun. It's also nice to have a one-word translation of 377:

Please do not replace Knowledge (XXG) pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Knowledge (XXG) because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please

328:

Burgundy and settled on the former. Of course, being willing to pay hundreds of dollars a bottle for Burgundy has a strong self-selection effect for people who already really like Burgundy...

2599: 2312: 2224: 2169: 386: 2037: 1489:

process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Knowledge (XXG)'s criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also

759: 747: 1316: 1213: 984: 848: 711: 124: 2050: 1088: 2167:! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the 660: 344:

major incident then a one-line sentence can cover. And I get it, no more then three edits to an article in a day, sheesh, should edit that down to a one line sentence.

2385: 371: 2078:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit

2557: 449:

No problem at all. My wife and I spent the first few days of our honeymoon there, and it's always had a fond place in my heart, so I keep an eye on the article.

2157: 1899: 157: 728: 653: 1898: 1923: 2763: 996:

New look for Wine Project Page; Wine Article assessment; Operation Stub-killer; New Template for Australian Wineries; New wine stub categories proposed.

2692:. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 2540: 2110: 2024: 2774: 2092:

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Knowledge (XXG)'s standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to

1922:

because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion

1413: 1289: 1161: 1042: 938: 802: 2056:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at

2653: 2365: 2276: 1878: 1666: 1490: 1100:

New Grape Infobox; Standard Grape article format; Wine photos; New wine stub categories created; Wine related deletion notices; and more

1497:). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Knowledge (XXG) or discuss the relevant issues at 2544: 2006: 1987: 1514: 646: 382: 547:

I now discover that it was deleted without any comment or explanation whatsoever. What are my options and what would you recommend?

91:

all of their contributions that they've made to either (1) all U.S. state, county, and city articles or (2) all articles, using the

2030: 2133: 2042: 1566: 2649: 2361: 2272: 1874: 1662: 1412: