184:
bias, one way or the other. So, therefore, with regard to the Tibet issue, that means I believe there should be no bias toward either the PRC view nor that of the
Tibetan Government in Exile and others. By all means both views should be presented, but it has to be done carefully and not just editing an article with your own view and presenting that as pure unadulterated, unquestionable fact, which is why I think, that someone suggested that you use words like, According to the PRC".
187:
I could go into great detail about my thoughts on the history of Tibet, but I seriously doubt that you and I would ever really fully agree about that. I will say one thing though - no-one has complete kowledge of every truth and every reality. And most "truths" are actually just opinions put forward
179:
as your response on the TalkTibet page was done under that user, even though you signed it as
Xiaoliang1. Maybe it would help if, before you make changes, edits or post a comment, you firstly check that you are signed in on wikipedia. That is not a criticism by the way, as I speak from experience of
212:
Hi, Tangerines. Thanks for your reply and suggestion. In my opinion, truth is truth. What varies from person to person is the analysis process and the conclusion drawing from the raw materials, such as, incomplete truth, misleading truth or even lied facts. But I resptect your opinion although I do
183:
In answer to your questions, it would take a lot more than just a few lines on here to give you fully the answer that is needed. However, what is truth for you might not be truth for someone else. And what I care about on wikipedia is that it presents a neutral point of view with no article showing
130:
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you!
42:
I agree with this person. No source from China can be seen as unbiased. I myself have plenty of information to disprive any notion that Tibet is or has been a part of China. Face it, Tibet is NOT historically part of China.
53:
So what? Alaska was once part of Russia. Some states in the south USA were once not part of the current union, and some were once a part of Mexico. Borders change, and yes
Tibetans is a nationality within the PRC.
32:
committed by the current regime. If you want to present the information in that website as the position of the
Chinese government, you can, but presenting them as facts is probably not a good idea.
20:
to report. However, I do not think your source is unbiased either. They openly supports the dictatorial
Chinese government. As you know, Tibet was once an independent nation during the
24:
but annexed later by China. The current communist government have done many atrocity in Tibet, so it's not unusual to see pro-Tibet information on
Knowledge (XXG). Remember the
180:
having done it myself when I first joined up. Just maybe have a quick check when you load wikipedia, before you edit or post a comment that you are signed on as
Xiaoliang1.
121:
213:
not argee with. I fully accepted your opinion that I should present those facts as the
Chinese point of view. Anyway, glad to talk with you. Cheers.
227:
127:
220:
Is it the truth that the land, known to some, as Tibet is now a part of the polity some call China now in the year 2007CE?
231:
94:
223:
74:
191:
Enjoy your time on wikipedia, I am sure I will continue to question your edits, but hey it should be fun!
117:
176:
55:
124:
by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button
203:
158:
25:
132:
110:
150:
70:
17:
192:
73:. If your info is still deleted otherwise, I would suggest that you might perhaps ask for
155:
153:, which states that no one can revert a page more than 3 times in 24 hours. Regards,
239:
Your version of truth may be very different from another person's version of truth.
44:
21:
78:
146:
90:
33:
29:
145:
Hi. Sorry for not explaining myself earlier. I've replied to your comment at
69:
List out the references you have on the page you edited, in accordance to
207:
162:
135:
126:
103:
81:
58:
47:
36:
16:
Hello! If you think your edits have been wrongly reverted you can go to
175:
Firstly, you seem to keep making edits using this anonymous user -
120:
and
Knowledge (XXG) pages that have open discussion, you should
116:
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to
8:
171:Reply to your comment on the TalkTibet page
221:
149:. In the meantime, please be aware of the
93:page for my comments related to Tibet.
7:
14:
125:
77:for a certain answer. Thanks.
28:and the brutal persecution of
1:
89:HI Xiaoliang. PLease see the
18:Administrator's noticeboard
253:
109:An Automated Message from
75:Knowledge (XXG):Meditation
59:01:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
208:22:24, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
163:04:10, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
136:15:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
104:21:43, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
82:07:59, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
48:09:17, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
37:01:39, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
234:) 00:17, 15 April 2007
188:as fact and truth.
71:Knowledge (XXG):MOS
177:User:66.38.139.129
26:Tiananmen Massacre
235:
226:comment added by
206:
196:♦Tangerines BFC ♦
151:three-revert rule
244:
202:
199:
161:
129:
101:
252:
251:
247:
246:
245:
243:
242:
241:
217:, 7 April 2007
193:
173:
154:
143:
122:sign your posts
114:
98:♦ Sir Blofeld ♦
95:
12:
11:
5:
250:
248:
238:
228:81.157.102.201
172:
169:
167:
142:
139:
113:
107:
87:
86:
85:
84:
63:
51:
50:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
249:
240:
236:
233:
229:
225:
218:
216:
210:
209:
205:
200:
198:
197:
189:
185:
181:
178:
170:
168:
165:
164:
160:
157:
152:
148:
140:
138:
137:
134:
128:
123:
119:
112:
108:
106:
105:
102:
100:
99:
92:
83:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
64:
61:
60:
57:
56:81.155.103.36
49:
46:
41:
40:
39:
38:
35:
31:
27:
23:
19:
237:
222:— Preceding
219:
214:
211:
195:
194:
190:
186:
182:
174:
166:
144:
115:
97:
96:
88:
62:
52:
22:Qing Dynasty
15:
133:HagermanBot
111:HagermanBot
45:ludahai 魯大海
147:Talk:Tibet
118:talk pages
91:Talk:Tibet
30:Falun Gong
224:unsigned
79:Mr Tan
141:Tibet
34:Wooyi
232:talk
215:Talk
204:Talk
159:khoi
156:Khoi
230:(
201:·
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
