192:
new consensus has been reached." If you agree with their removal, then let the consensus policy play out as described, that way I know who I legitimately need to convince. I have had conversations with many of these editors who have disputed and reverted my edits, and for the most part they have conceded on this issue. Consensus does not mean policy; if that were true, please point me to the policy which says succession boxes should be used for #1 charting songs and albums. There isn't one, thus there is as much consensus to have them as there is to not have them. Since many articles have seen the removal of these succession boxes for well over a month, it is implied per
43:
450:
68:
284:, which undid a vandal's self-revert. Presumably you did that because of the "section blanking" tag, but in this case the section should've been blanked (apart from anything else, it doesn't cite a reliable source for the information). Please can you take a little more care in future? Best wishes.
299:
My apology if I didn't notice the section is unnecessary, but I think if it's not cited it should not be deleted outright, but rather put a citation needed mark and wait if anyone can provide citations. It is true that
Knowledge requires citations, but we should also allow time for people to verify
191:
is not achieved through discussion but through an "implicit and invisible process on articles across
Knowledge. Any edit that is not disputed or reverted by another editor can be assumed to have consensus. Should that edit later be revised by another editor without dispute, it can be assumed that a
371:
Thank you for your note on my talkpage. Per AGF I accept that your edit was not intended to be disruptive, although it is not obvious how removing a section whose content has consensus is countering vandalism. Indeed, upon review of your contributions I am concerned that you often remove content -
376:, such edits should not be marked as such. I suggest that you more closely follow WP's guidelines and policies regarding appropriate editing behaviour if you wish that other editors do not have similar misunderstandings regarding your contributions.
495:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
423:. It would be nice to finally come to a resolution on this. If you have already participated in this RFC or do not wish to participate, then please disregard this notice. Thanks. --
419:
As someone who has an interest in the use of succession boxes in articles for songs and albums, I'd like to notify you of a request for comment that is taking place at
397:
169:
No worries, your edit was good. :) There were a couple others in there that had sneaked in and the quickest way to make things right was to revert to earlier. -
219:
had been warned of removing the boxes before a clear consensus is reached. Also the link you directed (WT:Charts) is not valid and the page does not exist. --
74:
Welcome to
Knowledge. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Knowledge, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to
215:
I don't really understand why you remove the succession box. I reviewed discussions about the removal of it but clearly a consensus has not reached yet.
428:
216:
201:
520:
461:
25:
457:
438:
261:
As you can see there's no reason for add them or remove them, if an editor want to remove them he can, there's no rule for use them.
538:
101:
to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to
Knowledge articles, and
21:
516:
507:
describes the
Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
512:
424:
197:
121:
453:
442:
136:
37:
This motto reflects the inclusionist desire to change
Knowledge only when no knowledge would be lost as a result.
120:, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please
381:
361:
319:
289:
174:
465:
328:
That someone could revert this edit in error is just about plausible, but that someone can revert this edit
337:
98:
420:
235:
373:
508:
377:
357:
315:
285:
193:
188:
170:
110:
301:
220:
139:
484:
475:
405:
333:
154:
94:
504:
488:
314:
Could you please read that section and tell me if you think it's worthy of an encyclopedia?
146:
102:
503:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
57:
below the table of content. The space above will serve as my temporary user space later on.
117:
106:
396:
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at
500:
492:
81:
532:
496:
401:
262:
250:
178:
150:
86:
456:
has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
128:
75:
249:
The songs before/after are always unsourced, and say that are the facts is
400:
regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
124:, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
67:
243:
They are too big, and collapsing them does not wor with printed works.
392:
97:
for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the
491:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
Knowledge
524:
469:
432:
409:
385:
365:
341:
323:
309:
293:
270:
228:
205:
158:
42:
374:
Knowledge:Minor edit#When not to mark an edit as a minor edit
256:
A see also including the number-one per chart is better idea.
238:, just needed to shout. Either way why you want those boxes:
66:
372:
claiming vandalism - while marking the edit as minor. Per
458:
the template's entry on the
Templates for discussion page
282:
132:
127:
The following is the log entry regarding this warning:
54:
421:
WT:CHARTS#Request for comment: Use of succession boxes
35:, which translates to "with the preserved truth".
483:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
78:, did not appear to be constructive and has been
109:users from editing if they repeatedly engage in
398:Knowledge:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
149:) on 2010-04-08T01:23:16+00:00 . Thank you.
8:
145:making a minor change censoring content (
26:Association of Inclusionist Wikipedians
415:RFC courtesy notice - succession boxes
165:Vandalism on today's featured article
7:
196:that consensus has been reached. --
14:
509:review the candidates' statements
448:
332:when questioned is bewildering.
164:
41:
515:. For the Election committee,
485:Arbitration Committee election
476:ArbCom elections are now open!
1:
525:14:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
470:13:07, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
454:Template:Infobox BART station
443:Template:Infobox BART station
433:00:38, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
410:19:50, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
386:13:36, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
366:13:39, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
342:09:57, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
324:01:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
310:01:10, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
294:01:06, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
271:02:55, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
229:06:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
206:23:15, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
511:and submit your choices on
425:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
198:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars
555:
517:MediaWiki message delivery
179:01:46, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
116:Cluebot produces very few
300:and provide citations. --
159:01:23, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
147:Knowledge is not censored
539:Inclusionist Wikipedians
330:and then defend doing so
305:
31:The motto of the AIW is
439:Nomination for deletion
211:Removing succession box
71:
489:Arbitration Committee
70:
105:have the ability to
493:arbitration process
281:You made this edit
246:They are obsoletes.
33:conservata veritate
24:is a member of the
505:arbitration policy
72:
55:leave your message
277:More care needed?
49:
48:
546:
452:
451:
268:
265:
184:Succession boxes
58:
52:Welcome! Please
45:
44:
16:
15:
554:
553:
549:
548:
547:
545:
544:
543:
529:
528:
513:the voting page
479:
449:
446:
417:
394:
354:
279:
266:
263:
213:
186:
167:
118:false positives
65:
53:
12:
11:
5:
552:
550:
542:
541:
531:
530:
482:
478:
473:
445:
436:
416:
413:
393:
390:
389:
388:
378:LessHeard vanU
358:LessHeard vanU
353:
350:
349:
348:
347:
346:
345:
344:
316:Philip Trueman
286:Philip Trueman
278:
275:
274:
273:
258:
257:
254:
247:
244:
240:
239:
212:
209:
185:
182:
171:The Bushranger
166:
163:
162:
161:
125:
122:report it here
114:
103:administrators
80:automatically
64:
61:
47:
46:
39:
36:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
551:
540:
537:
536:
534:
527:
526:
522:
518:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
494:
490:
486:
477:
474:
472:
471:
467:
463:
462:69.158.95.113
459:
455:
444:
440:
437:
435:
434:
430:
426:
422:
414:
412:
411:
407:
403:
399:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
370:
369:
368:
367:
363:
359:
352:November 2010
351:
343:
339:
335:
331:
327:
326:
325:
321:
317:
313:
312:
311:
307:
303:
298:
297:
296:
295:
291:
287:
283:
276:
272:
269:
260:
259:
255:
252:
248:
245:
242:
241:
237:
233:
232:
231:
230:
226:
222:
218:
210:
208:
207:
203:
199:
195:
190:
183:
181:
180:
176:
172:
160:
156:
152:
148:
144:
141:
138:
134:
130:
126:
123:
119:
115:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
92:
91:
90:
88:
84:
83:
77:
69:
62:
60:
59:
56:
40:
38:
34:
29:
27:
23:
18:
17:
480:
447:
418:
395:
355:
334:JamesBWatson
329:
280:
224:
214:
194:WP:CONSENSUS
189:WP:CONSENSUS
187:
168:
142:
99:welcome page
79:
73:
51:
50:
32:
30:
19:
356:(redacted)
217:This editor
95:the sandbox
93:Please use
501:topic bans
129:Will Clark
76:Will Clark
63:April 2010
497:site bans
236:WT:CHARTS
111:vandalism
533:Category
234:I meant
82:reverted
402:28bytes
151:ClueBot
133:changed
87:ClueBot
487:. The
267:hotch
251:WP:OR
107:block
20:This
521:talk
466:talk
429:talk
406:talk
382:talk
362:talk
338:talk
320:talk
306:talk
302:Yong
290:talk
225:talk
221:Yong
202:talk
175:talk
155:talk
137:Yong
131:was
22:user
481:Hi,
441:of
143:(t)
140:(u)
135:by
89:.
85:by
535::
523:)
499:,
468:)
460:.
431:)
408:)
384:)
364:)
340:)
322:)
308:)
292:)
264:Tb
227:)
204:)
177:)
157:)
519:(
464:(
427:(
404:(
380:(
360:(
336:(
318:(
304:(
288:(
253:.
223:(
200:(
173:(
153:(
113:.
28:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
