Knowledge

User talk:Ytcracker

Source 📝

129: 227:. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose 90:
require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.
70:
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.
47:
consists entirely of original research without a single citation to a secondary source. Unless solid secondary sources can be found, the entire section is subject to deletion under
99: 192: 94:
For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of
102:
will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.
252: 74:
On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (
248: 196: 239:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
244: 184: 140: 98:, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then 188: 171: 56: 75: 240: 200: 136: 114: 44: 32: 25: 78:). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was 52: 216: 207: 167: 153:
While all constructive contributions to Knowledge are appreciated, content or articles may be
236: 220: 40: 36: 235:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 95: 232: 224: 110: 106: 228: 154: 48: 177:
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing
82:. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to 148:
Notability. Not covered (significantly) in any independent secondary source
105:
Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of
256: 118: 66:
Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
60: 223:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Knowledge
43:
applies (which one?), but the larger issue at hand is that the
127: 195:
process can result in deletion without discussion, and
160:
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the
215:You appear to be eligible to vote in the current 8: 124:Proposed deletion of Dan Maynes-Aminzade 35:. I disagree with your assessment that 166:notice, but please explain why in your 51:. Can you help find such sources? -- 7: 155:deleted for any of several reasons 143:because of the following concern: 14: 241:review the candidates' statements 86:in the next few days. This does 21:let us put the past behind us. 247:. For the Election committee, 217:Arbitration Committee election 208:ArbCom elections are now open! 1: 257:13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC) 243:and submit your choices on 199:allows discussion to reach 180:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 163:{{proposed deletion/dated}} 272: 249:MediaWiki message delivery 191:exist. In particular, the 119:18:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC) 185:proposed deletion process 61:22:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC) 172:the article's talk page 132: 221:Arbitration Committee 197:articles for deletion 141:proposed for deletion 131: 37:one of the exceptions 17:reset button 20090602 76:consensus discussion 225:arbitration process 137:Dan Maynes-Aminzade 33:Papal infallibility 31:I saw your edit of 26:Papal infallibility 237:arbitration policy 189:deletion processes 133: 263: 182: 181: 165: 164: 130: 85: 81: 271: 270: 266: 265: 264: 262: 261: 260: 245:the voting page 211: 193:speedy deletion 179: 178: 162: 161: 128: 126: 100:this discussion 83: 79: 68: 29: 19: 12: 11: 5: 269: 267: 214: 210: 205: 203:for deletion. 183:will stop the 151: 150: 125: 122: 107:User:Jarry1250 67: 64: 45:entire section 28: 23: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 268: 259: 258: 254: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 226: 222: 218: 209: 206: 204: 202: 198: 194: 190: 186: 175: 173: 169: 158: 156: 149: 146: 145: 144: 142: 138: 123: 121: 120: 116: 112: 108: 103: 101: 97: 92: 89: 77: 72: 65: 63: 62: 58: 54: 53:Cat Whisperer 50: 46: 42: 38: 34: 27: 24: 22: 16: 212: 187:, but other 176: 168:edit summary 159: 152: 147: 135:The article 134: 104: 93: 87: 73: 69: 30: 20: 233:topic bans 229:site bans 201:consensus 139:has been 111:LivingBot 41:WP:WEASEL 96:WP:MINOR 219:. The 170:or on 49:WP:NOR 84:false 253:talk 115:talk 80:true 57:talk 213:Hi, 88:not 39:to 255:) 231:, 174:. 157:. 117:) 109:, 59:) 251:( 113:( 55:(

Index

Papal infallibility
Papal infallibility
one of the exceptions
WP:WEASEL
entire section
WP:NOR
Cat Whisperer
talk
22:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
consensus discussion
WP:MINOR
this discussion
User:Jarry1250
LivingBot
talk
18:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
Dan Maynes-Aminzade
proposed for deletion
deleted for any of several reasons
edit summary
the article's talk page
proposed deletion process
deletion processes
speedy deletion
articles for deletion
consensus
ArbCom elections are now open!
Arbitration Committee election
Arbitration Committee
arbitration process

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.