Knowledge (XXG)

User talk:Zedembee

Source đź“ť

121:(pretty much simultaneously) did so without any accompanying explanation on the relevant Talk pages. I HAVE read up on COI, thanks, and know this to be true: the Knowledge (XXG) documentation of COI makes clear that: "if you place this tag, you should promptly start a discussion on the article's talk page to explain what is non-neutral about the article". This requirement was not met; and as the documentation continues: "If you do not start this discussion, then any editor is justified in removing the tag without warning." I'm not following up with the OP on the COI tag when the OP can't even be bothered to follow the rules. Cheers, 816: 1032: 238: 870: 703:, so you'll need to detail how you managed to do so as well as the actual permission. Copyright violations have legal implications for Knowledge (XXG) because our content is freely licensed and we require all content uploaded to be the same. While this conversation is unpleasant, you do have a duty to truthfully respond. Should you choose not to, I will open a request at 979: 398: 156:
after COI vandals :) But I would say, having experienced it myself, that unreasoned accusations of bias definitely create a hostile environment for Knowledge (XXG) writers, which is likely why the official Knowledge (XXG) documentation on COI is really unequivocal on this: no entry on Talk page, no COI tag. Thanks for writing again, good to hear your thoughts.
179:
made by User:General Ization. This is an urgent message. Go to the article titled Ashley Benson to restore my edits and I know it was still a rumor. Next, go talk to User:General Ization to never revert other user's edits to cover the source because it was a rumor. I will be happy for your reply, thanks.
698:
Look, I'm not trying to badger you but you are required to answer certain questions and given your inability to be forthcoming and the fact that you doubled down after you were told that you uploaded copyright violations does not make me inclined to believe your statements. Accidents happen. Sure. We
376:
Maybe this sounds weird, but I honestly want to thank you. After thinking about it a few hours, the recent conversations made me see that my judgment is clouded in some areas. While I can't say I 100% agree with you, the way I've dealt with this is below my own standards. The Lauren Wolkstein article
718:
Once again: no, I will not be making any biographical declaration. I am truthfully responding. I understand I am required to declare any Conflict of Interest, and, once again, I have not declared because there isn't any. Yes, you must go ahead and resolve this however you wish, to your satisfaction.
155:
Heya. Yeah, I don't want to harass anybody, but isn't it harassment for this individual to keep posting warrantless COI tags? I feel like it's my civic duty to call out the pattern. I've done so now and will leave him or her to their conscience. I promise I have better things to do than poop-a-scoop
136:
Hi again. I saw that the user who tagged the articles you were working on has been, at least, mildly scolded by admins in the past for doing this. Also, I saw you reverted them doing it again. Even if you are in the right it could be considered harassment if you keep doing that which would get you
954:
This is just to let you know that I've moved PodShare to draft space. I think this will be in everyone's interest. There were rather a lot of primary and other unreliable sources; however, I'm not doubting the notability of the topic. We can now take a long hard look at it, and a successful review
921:
and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion
782:
Got it. I'm still learning some things about Knowledge (XXG). I wasn't quite sure what I was doing by removing the deletion tag, but presumed that actions taken in the sincere perception of vandalism were permissible. I posted to the Talk page giving my reasons for my actions at the time. This is
635:
Those are good points. I made those mistakes in error, which means in ignorance and misunderstanding. I've made thousands of contributions during my time here on Knowledge (XXG), and a handful of missteps. The hostility in your tone is unwarranted. I will ignore you from this point on because you
178:
Hi, on Ashley Benson's I did put the hidden Wiki Markup to cover the source on Ashley Benson's rumored breakup but it was restored. I know I didn't make mistakes. I covered up the source and the user giving me a warning. Could you go to Ashley Benson's article and restore my edits. The revert was
578:
No. I am not required to make biographical declarations on Knowledge (XXG). It is entirely possible to attain the permission of someone without having a relationship that would qualify as a Conflict of Interest. I maintain I have full integrity as a content creator and editor. Thank you and with
213:
Hi guys. I edited Cara D's page last week after numerous other Wikipedians were asserting the breakup as fact. At the time of their writing, only 'People' had announced that the couple had spilt, without confirmation from the couple themselves and with other outlets simply regurgitating 'People'
355:
To follow up, I've set in motion the formal release of the photograph via email to Knowledge (XXG). I've also suppressed any photo for now, because the colored photograph to which you reverted in the Infobox is of dubious provenance to the subject and arguably itself ought to be removed from
593:
You clearly have a conflict of interest and a tenuous relationship with the truth given your multiple uploads of copyright violations. So why should we trust what you say now when you've done nothing but edit in a promotional manner and make dubious copyright claims on works you don't own?
94:
tag on the article you edited on the article talk page. Users also have a talk page and they will be notified if you write them a nice message and can more likely reply. Check the article history for the person who put in the tag and also read up on COI. Thanks and happy editing!
623:
is one of many sources of proof. There is no permission and you uploaded a copyright violation as you 1.) didn't provide a source 2.) didn't provide a source which clearly identifies it as CC by SA 4.0 as you indicated on your upload and 3.) no such permission was ever sent.
340:
First of all, your tone could be friendlier and less patronizing. Second, I have both the permission of the actual subject of the photo and the photographer. I'm pretty sure I set that up correctly when I posted the photo. But I'll check the data and amend accordingly.
605:
Huh? There has been no copyright violation, let alone multiple violations. That is your perception of events, and you're entitled to it but you have no proof either way. I'm not here to be insulted, thank you, and won't engage with you again. All the best to you.
902:, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read 1075: 281: 198:
and make your case if you think you are in the right. However, looking at what you did does not look proper. The entry has 3 sources so you'd have to argue why it should not be there, or hidden for that matter.
214:(with those outlets then cited as references, giving the false appearance of cross-verification). I've since taken my eye off it and don't know if there has been further reporting to confirm the breakup. 1059:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 667:
Um, why? I have made thousands of contributions to Knowledge (XXG). It may not be literally thousands but it sure feels like it with folks like you making it so unpleasant. See my Contributions page.
265:. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose 488:'s terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See 180: 1045: 251: 719:
I will not participate in further discussion with you because I do not trust that you are not motivated by animus and life is just too gosh-darned short. All the best and over and out.
402: 765:, but due to the disruption you're causing at the article itself (specifically, edit warring over the AfD templates) I have blocked you from editing the article for a week. 184: 820: 69: 899: 859: 489: 1002: 841:
Thanks for letting me know. I have responded and have nothing further to say. I will not engage in any further discussion. All the best to you.
1098: 303: 377:
has a long troubled history and my fuse when dealing with it has gotten too short over the years. I should have known better. Sorry. —
926:. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the 473: 824: 453: 415: 51: 1094: 991: 299: 204: 146: 100: 81: 1068: 879: 274: 36: 22: 681: 406: 72:
on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out
907: 420: 923: 495:
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.
533:
All my contributions to this page are made of my own free will, and based on my own research not privileged information;
56: 1080: 286: 886: 215: 200: 142: 110: 96: 77: 986:, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months 31: 1056: 413:(COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the 262: 63: 76:, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! 73: 658: 440: 382: 330: 138: 46: 1013: 485: 410: 1039: 983: 971: 948: 245: 536:
There is no external relationship that would influence my integrity as a content creator or editor.
1052: 995: 258: 770: 195: 430:
articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
405:
your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things
27:
I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
918: 895: 863: 118: 1064: 903: 704: 463: 322: 270: 1087: 935: 762: 684:. Turns out it's 706 contributions. But, sure, jump on two images and initiate a witch hunt. 560: 293: 1067:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 1060: 987: 783:
such an incredible waste of everyone's energy and time. All caused by one editor with some
565:
Second, I have both the permission of the actual subject of the photo and the photographer.
273:, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The 266: 91: 1009: 828: 708: 625: 595: 568: 496: 356:
Wikimedia. Please allow 7 days for the formal release to be processed by Knowledge (XXG).
540:
Please... address the real problem here, which is the bizarre behavior of other editors.
898:, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Knowledge (XXG). This has been done under 530:
I am not paid to create or edit content on Knowledge (XXG) in this or any other article;
960: 842: 788: 766: 720: 685: 668: 637: 607: 580: 541: 510: 357: 342: 219: 157: 122: 41: 509:
Thank you, but there is no conflict of interest or I would have declared it by now.
1031: 237: 922:
tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with
114: 90:
P.S. That's the standard welcome but I noticed you replied to a user who put a
620: 955:
will give it more credibility when approved and transferred to article space.
699:
apologize, fix them and move on. However, you've insisted you got permission
651:
I've made thousands of contributions during my time here on Knowledge (XXG),
194:
Hi. This user does not seem to be involved in that article. Please go to
956: 878:
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read
1071:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
978: 397: 277:
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
1049:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
982:
Hello, Zedembee. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
255:
are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
1102: 1017: 964: 942: 913:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may
850: 833: 796: 774: 728: 713: 693: 676: 662: 645: 630: 615: 600: 588: 573: 549: 518: 501: 386: 365: 350: 334: 307: 208: 188: 165: 150: 130: 104: 85: 452:
your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see
1084:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 321:
Don't upload photos without a publicly viewable free license or
290:. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add 1074:
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review
280:
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review
1043:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All
249:
is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All
928: 868: 636:
seem to be struggling with some bigger anger. All the best.
559:
Can you please explain the nature of your relationship with
454:
Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI
827:
incident with which you may be involved. Thank you.
436:
on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the
137:
in trouble. A good place to ask about what to do is the
1055:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
261:
is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the
462:
to your organization's website in other articles (see
25:
to Knowledge (XXG)! Thank you for your contributions.
810:
Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
1008:Thank you for your submission to Knowledge (XXG). 821:Knowledge (XXG):Conflict of interest/Noticeboard 900:section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion 876: 1001:If the page has already been deleted, you can 761:You are welcome to participate in the AfD for 141:which can help answer questions or concerns. 8: 990:, so if you wish to retain the page, please 563:, which allowed you to make statements like 490:Knowledge (XXG):Paid-contribution disclosure 1026: 232: 113:. The person who posted a COI tag on both 62:I hope you enjoy editing here and being a 924:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines 218:is right in that I was not involved with 880:the guide to writing your first article 423:for more information. We ask that you: 787:issues about this subject. Thank you. 650: 564: 181:2001:569:74D2:A800:9943:208A:60D4:FC16 7: 1040:2021 Arbitration Committee elections 998:that it be moved to your userspace. 246:2020 Arbitration Committee elections 1057:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 1023:ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message 1005:so you can continue working on it. 885:You may want to consider using the 819:There is currently a discussion at 409:on Knowledge (XXG), you may have a 263:Knowledge (XXG) arbitration process 229:ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message 32:The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG) 14: 908:Knowledge (XXG):FAQ/Organizations 472:to comply with Knowledge (XXG)'s 1030: 977: 814: 396: 236: 1078:and submit your choices on the 523:For the avoidance of all doubt: 392:Managing a conflict of interest 284:and submit your choices on the 784: 416:conflict of interest guideline 1: 1103:00:59, 23 November 2021 (UTC) 308:03:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC) 889:to help you create articles. 567:and yet have no connection? 52:How to write a great article 1018:09:01, 3 October 2021 (UTC) 1123: 1095:MediaWiki message delivery 387:02:14, 30 April 2021 (UTC) 366:06:35, 29 April 2021 (UTC) 351:06:09, 29 April 2021 (UTC) 335:08:37, 28 April 2021 (UTC) 300:MediaWiki message delivery 166:04:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC) 151:00:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 894:A tag has been placed on 707:to discuss this further. 653:Interesting statement? — 428:avoid editing or creating 131:18:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC) 105:23:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC) 86:23:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC) 74:Knowledge (XXG):Questions 1092:to your user talk page. 846: 792: 724: 689: 672: 641: 611: 584: 545: 514: 361: 346: 298:to your user talk page. 209:16:43, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 189:03:48, 11 May 2020 (UTC) 161: 126: 1003:request it be undeleted 965:08:23, 3 May 2021 (UTC) 943:20:00, 2 May 2021 (UTC) 910:for more information. 851:21:00, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 834:20:41, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 797:19:49, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 775:19:38, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 729:20:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 714:20:20, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 694:20:23, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 677:20:18, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 663:20:15, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 646:20:05, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 631:19:59, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 616:19:57, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 601:19:55, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 589:19:51, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 574:19:39, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 550:19:37, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 519:19:33, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 502:19:27, 1 May 2021 (UTC) 929:deleting administrator 915:contest the nomination 904:the guidelines on spam 891: 873: 701:from the photographers 407:you have written about 1053:Arbitration Committee 1037:Hello! Voting in the 872: 823:regarding a possible 480:In addition, you are 421:FAQ for organizations 259:Arbitration Committee 243:Hello! Voting in the 216:Someone in SoCal Area 201:Someone in SoCal Area 143:Someone in SoCal Area 111:Someone in SoCal Area 97:Someone in SoCal Area 78:Someone in SoCal Area 825:conflict of interest 486:Wikimedia Foundation 411:conflict of interest 401:Hello, Zedembee. We 92:Conflict of Interest 1069:arbitration policy 970:Concern regarding 874: 275:arbitration policy 196:Talk:Ashley Benson 37:How to edit a page 1110: 1109: 1105: 919:visiting the page 314: 313: 1114: 1093: 1091: 1034: 1027: 981: 940: 938: 931: 871: 831: 818: 817: 763:Lauren Wolkstein 711: 656: 628: 598: 571: 561:Lauren Wolkstein 499: 474:content policies 445: 439: 400: 380: 328: 317:Photo permission 297: 240: 233: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1085: 1025: 975: 952: 936: 934: 927: 892: 869: 867: 860:Speedy deletion 829: 815: 812: 807: 759: 709: 654: 626: 596: 569: 497: 443: 437: 434:propose changes 394: 378: 374: 326: 319: 291: 231: 176: 57:Manual of Style 19: 12: 11: 5: 1120: 1118: 1108: 1107: 1076:the candidates 1046:eligible users 1035: 1024: 1021: 988:may be deleted 984:Draft:PodShare 974: 972:Draft:PodShare 968: 951: 949:Draft:PodShare 946: 887:Article Wizard 875: 866: 862:nomination of 857: 856: 855: 854: 853: 811: 808: 806: 803: 802: 801: 800: 799: 785:self-confessed 758: 755: 754: 753: 752: 751: 750: 749: 748: 747: 746: 745: 744: 743: 742: 741: 740: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 679: 538: 537: 534: 531: 527: 526: 525: 524: 521: 478: 477: 467: 457: 447: 431: 393: 390: 373: 370: 369: 368: 353: 325:permission. — 318: 315: 312: 311: 282:the candidates 252:eligible users 241: 230: 227: 226: 225: 224: 223: 175: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 70:sign your name 67: 60: 59: 54: 49: 44: 39: 34: 26: 18: 15: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1119: 1106: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1089: 1083: 1082: 1077: 1072: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1058: 1054: 1048: 1047: 1042: 1041: 1036: 1033: 1029: 1028: 1022: 1020: 1019: 1015: 1011: 1006: 1004: 999: 997: 993: 989: 985: 980: 973: 969: 967: 966: 962: 958: 950: 947: 945: 944: 941: 939: 930: 925: 920: 916: 911: 909: 905: 901: 897: 890: 888: 883: 881: 865: 861: 858: 852: 848: 844: 840: 839: 838: 837: 836: 835: 832: 826: 822: 809: 804: 798: 794: 790: 786: 781: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 772: 768: 764: 756: 730: 726: 722: 717: 716: 715: 712: 706: 702: 697: 696: 695: 691: 687: 683: 680: 678: 674: 670: 666: 665: 664: 660: 652: 649: 648: 647: 643: 639: 634: 633: 632: 629: 622: 619: 618: 617: 613: 609: 604: 603: 602: 599: 592: 591: 590: 586: 582: 577: 576: 575: 572: 566: 562: 558: 557: 556: 555: 554: 553: 552: 551: 547: 543: 535: 532: 529: 528: 522: 520: 516: 512: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 503: 500: 493: 491: 487: 483: 475: 471: 468: 465: 461: 460:avoid linking 458: 455: 451: 448: 442: 435: 432: 429: 426: 425: 424: 422: 418: 417: 412: 408: 404: 399: 391: 389: 388: 384: 371: 367: 363: 359: 354: 352: 348: 344: 339: 338: 337: 336: 332: 324: 316: 310: 309: 305: 301: 295: 289: 288: 283: 278: 276: 272: 268: 264: 260: 254: 253: 248: 247: 242: 239: 235: 234: 228: 221: 220:Ashley Benson 217: 212: 211: 210: 206: 202: 197: 193: 192: 191: 190: 186: 182: 174:Ashley Benson 173: 167: 163: 159: 154: 153: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 134: 133: 132: 128: 124: 120: 116: 112: 107: 106: 102: 98: 93: 88: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 65: 58: 55: 53: 50: 48: 45: 43: 40: 38: 35: 33: 30: 29: 28: 24: 16: 1079: 1073: 1050: 1044: 1038: 1007: 1000: 976: 953: 933: 914: 912: 893: 884: 877: 813: 760: 700: 661:or ping me) 539: 494: 481: 479: 470:do your best 469: 459: 449: 441:request edit 433: 427: 414: 395: 385:or ping me) 375: 333:or ping me) 320: 285: 279: 256: 250: 244: 177: 108: 89: 61: 20: 1081:voting page 937:scope_creep 830:TAXIDICAE💰 710:TAXIDICAE💰 682:Here you go 655:Alexis Jazz 627:TAXIDICAE💰 597:TAXIDICAE💰 570:TAXIDICAE💰 498:TAXIDICAE💰 379:Alexis Jazz 327:Alexis Jazz 287:voting page 222:. All best. 115:Elvina Beck 21:Hello, and 1065:topic bans 1010:FireflyBot 446:template); 271:topic bans 64:Wikipedian 42:Help pages 1061:site bans 994:again or 372:Thank you 267:site bans 896:PodShare 864:PodShare 843:Zedembee 789:Zedembee 767:Primefac 721:Zedembee 686:Zedembee 669:Zedembee 638:Zedembee 608:Zedembee 581:Zedembee 542:Zedembee 511:Zedembee 482:required 450:disclose 358:Zedembee 343:Zedembee 158:Zedembee 139:Teahouse 123:Zedembee 119:PodShare 47:Tutorial 1088:NoACEMM 996:request 992:edit it 705:WP:COIN 484:by the 464:WP:Spam 403:welcome 323:WP:OTRS 294:NoACEMM 68:Please 23:welcome 17:Welcome 932:. 579:best. 1099:talk 1051:The 1014:talk 961:talk 906:and 847:talk 805:COIN 793:talk 771:talk 725:talk 690:talk 673:talk 659:talk 642:talk 621:Here 612:talk 585:talk 546:talk 515:talk 419:and 383:talk 362:talk 347:talk 331:talk 304:talk 257:The 205:talk 185:talk 162:talk 147:talk 127:talk 117:and 109:Hi, 101:talk 82:talk 957:Deb 917:by 757:AfD 1101:) 1090:}} 1086:{{ 1063:, 1016:) 963:) 849:) 795:) 773:) 727:) 692:) 675:) 644:) 614:) 587:) 548:) 517:) 492:. 466:); 456:); 444:}} 438:{{ 364:) 349:) 306:) 296:}} 292:{{ 269:, 207:) 187:) 164:) 149:) 129:) 103:) 84:) 66:! 1097:( 1012:( 959:( 882:. 845:( 791:( 769:( 723:( 688:( 671:( 657:( 640:( 610:( 583:( 544:( 513:( 476:. 381:( 360:( 345:( 329:( 302:( 203:( 183:( 160:( 145:( 125:( 99:( 80:(

Index

welcome
The five pillars of Knowledge (XXG)
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Wikipedian
sign your name
Knowledge (XXG):Questions
Someone in SoCal Area
talk
23:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Conflict of Interest
Someone in SoCal Area
talk
23:30, 7 April 2020 (UTC)
Someone in SoCal Area
Elvina Beck
PodShare
Zedembee
talk
18:25, 9 April 2020 (UTC)
Teahouse
Someone in SoCal Area
talk
00:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
Zedembee
talk
04:05, 23 April 2020 (UTC)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑