28:
destination, when one candidate route includes a familiar route, whilst the other candidate route includes no familiar routes. The effect is most salient when subjects are driving, but is still detectable for pedestrians and users of public transport. The effect has been observed for centuries but was first studied scientifically in the 1980s and 1990s following from earlier "heuristics and biases" work undertaken by
27:
in which travellers will estimate the time taken to traverse routes differently depending on their familiarity with the route. Frequently travelled routes are assessed as taking a shorter time than unfamiliar routes. This effect creates errors when estimating the most efficient route to an unfamiliar
43:, it is hypothesised that drivers use less cognitive effort when traversing familiar routes and therefore underestimate the time taken to traverse the familiar route. The well travelled road effect has been hypothesised as a reason that self-reported
165:
Jackson, W. Burke; Jucker, James V. (1982). "An
Empirical Study of Travel Time Variability and Travel Choice Behavior".
260:
66:
44:
61:
56:
71:
125:
236:
209:
140:
201:
174:
104:
227:
Rubia, K; Smith, A (2004). "The neural correlates of cognitive time management: a review".
29:
192:
Zakay, Dan; Fallach, Eli (1984). "Immediate and remote time estimation — A comparison".
24:
254:
205:
126:"Prospective and retrospective duration judgments: an executive-control perspective"
33:
40:
240:
144:
213:
178:
109:
92:
148:
8:
108:
83:
7:
229:Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
133:Acta Neurobiologiae Experimentalis
14:
97:Perception & Psychophysics
1:
206:10.1016/0001-6918(84)90054-4
124:Zakay, D; Block, RA (2004).
91:Allan, Lorraine G. (1979).
277:
21:well travelled road effect
93:"The perception of time"
67:List of cognitive biases
45:experience curve effects
167:Transportation Science
62:Availability heuristic
57:Accuracy and precision
179:10.1287/trsc.16.4.460
47:are overestimated.
110:10.3758/BF03204158
194:Acta Psychologica
72:Weber–Fechner law
268:
261:Cognitive biases
245:
244:
224:
218:
217:
189:
183:
182:
162:
156:
155:
153:
147:. Archived from
130:
121:
115:
114:
112:
88:
276:
275:
271:
270:
269:
267:
266:
265:
251:
250:
249:
248:
226:
225:
221:
191:
190:
186:
164:
163:
159:
151:
128:
123:
122:
118:
90:
89:
85:
80:
53:
30:Daniel Kahneman
17:
12:
11:
5:
274:
272:
264:
263:
253:
252:
247:
246:
219:
184:
173:(4): 460–475.
157:
154:on 2016-05-24.
116:
103:(5): 340–354.
82:
81:
79:
76:
75:
74:
69:
64:
59:
52:
49:
39:Much like the
25:cognitive bias
16:Cognitive bias
15:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
273:
262:
259:
258:
256:
242:
238:
235:(3): 329–40.
234:
230:
223:
220:
215:
211:
207:
203:
199:
195:
188:
185:
180:
176:
172:
168:
161:
158:
150:
146:
142:
139:(3): 319–28.
138:
134:
127:
120:
117:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
87:
84:
77:
73:
70:
68:
65:
63:
60:
58:
55:
54:
50:
48:
46:
42:
37:
35:
31:
26:
22:
232:
228:
222:
200:(1): 69–81.
197:
193:
187:
170:
166:
160:
149:the original
136:
132:
119:
100:
96:
86:
38:
34:Amos Tversky
20:
18:
41:Stroop task
78:References
255:Category
241:15283476
145:15283475
51:See also
214:6507128
239:
212:
143:
152:(PDF)
129:(PDF)
23:is a
237:PMID
210:PMID
141:PMID
32:and
19:The
202:doi
175:doi
105:doi
257::
233:64
231:.
208:.
198:57
196:.
171:16
169:.
137:64
135:.
131:.
101:26
99:.
95:.
36:.
243:.
216:.
204::
181:.
177::
113:.
107::
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.