356:
I'm a virus researcher, and this was clearly not written by someone who knew what they were doing. This does match behaviour of other viruses, and I doubt it is a complete hoax (although several parts seem just made-up), but this is entirely un-scientific. It's akin to someone getting rabies and
181:
Knowledge (XXG) is not a place for personal accounts of experiences with viruses. If the virus can be established as important (I have found nothing to indicate that with Google, etc) then the article needs a complete rewrite, and
Mitsukai's above comment seems to indicate that the virus is
140:. Makes me want to start a new category; "either nothing or something". Its such a mishmash I can't make head nor tail of it. It's certainly not encyclopedic, and has a good chance of being a hoax.
119:
that most systems are innoculated against unless you aren't running an antivirus program at all. Likely this is an attempt to create an "authorative" site to reference for a virus hoax.--
64:
Somehow, this article does not seem to fit in with the rest of the encyclopedia. It reads sort of like an editorial, an informative report. Is this virus notable?
206:
for a large number of reasons, including, but not limited to, non-notable, unencyclopedic, vanity, original research, unverifiable...
17:
272:
379:
36:
378:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
361:
348:
336:
322:
303:
284:
281:
262:
259:
246:
234:
222:
210:
198:
186:
173:
160:
144:
132:
107:
95:
81:
68:
52:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
276:
process currently being tested out. Consider using that simpler process for the next similar nomination. --
58:
315:
298:
311:
badly written, personal essay, does not appear to be factually correct, no references, not notable.
277:
255:
333:
319:
127:
49:
103:
if for no other reason than "The "Happy" Virus was found by this author on
February 25, 2006."
194:
As has been said previously, this is a personal account and does not belong on
Knowledge (XXG)
116:
141:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
293:
92:
65:
231:
157:
153:
344:. Personal essay, no references, not noteworthy, more than likely a hoax article. --
219:
170:
120:
358:
345:
104:
78:
243:
195:
183:
165:
Is there a category to Delete for cluelessness? Guess not. In that case, just
207:
270:: uncontroversial deletions like this one are good candidates for the
372:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
91:— personal experiance, not relivent in the manor presented
357:
writing an article on "Toothpaste Mouth
Syndrome." --
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
382:). No further edits should be made to this page.
242:. What can I say, I'm following the herd. --
77:— Personal essay/research, or else a hoax. —
8:
115:. A Happy virus does exist, but it's a
169:per above: Personal essay/experience
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
218:Not encyclopedic, personal research
24:
273:Knowledge (XXG):Proposed deletion
330:Super-ultra high strength delete
292:Hell, I remember that 99 virus
230:Personal research and useless
1:
44:The result of the debate was
399:
314:Above unsigned comment by
362:01:06, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
349:00:09, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
337:20:56, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
323:20:57, 6 March 2006 (UTC)
304:11:33, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
285:04:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
263:04:24, 5 March 2006 (UTC)
254:as original research. --
247:18:39, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
235:16:26, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
223:03:28, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
211:00:52, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
199:23:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
187:19:33, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
174:17:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
161:17:18, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
145:16:25, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
133:16:24, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
108:16:23, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
96:16:22, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
82:16:16, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
69:15:57, 1 March 2006 (UTC)
53:01:17, 7 March 2006 (UTC)
375:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
152:, probable hoax, not
332:personal experience
117:seven-year-old virus
156:per description.--
390:
377:
301:
296:
34:
398:
397:
393:
392:
391:
389:
388:
387:
386:
380:deletion review
373:
299:
294:
62:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
396:
394:
385:
384:
367:
365:
364:
351:
339:
327:
326:
325:
306:
287:
278:King of Hearts
265:
256:King of Hearts
249:
237:
225:
213:
201:
189:
182:unimportant.
176:
163:
147:
135:
110:
98:
85:
84:
61:
56:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
395:
383:
381:
376:
370:
369:
368:
363:
360:
355:
354:Strong Delete
352:
350:
347:
343:
340:
338:
335:
331:
328:
324:
321:
317:
316:85.144.113.76
313:
312:
310:
309:Strong delete
307:
305:
302:
297:
291:
290:Strong delete
288:
286:
283:
279:
275:
274:
269:
266:
264:
261:
257:
253:
250:
248:
245:
241:
238:
236:
233:
229:
228:Strong Delete
226:
224:
221:
217:
214:
212:
209:
205:
204:Strong delete
202:
200:
197:
193:
192:Strong delete
190:
188:
185:
180:
177:
175:
172:
168:
164:
162:
159:
155:
151:
148:
146:
143:
139:
136:
134:
131:
130:
129:
124:
123:
118:
114:
113:Strong delete
111:
109:
106:
102:
99:
97:
94:
90:
87:
86:
83:
80:
76:
73:
72:
71:
70:
67:
60:
59:"Happy" Virus
57:
55:
54:
51:
50:Mailer Diablo
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
374:
371:
366:
353:
341:
329:
308:
289:
271:
267:
251:
239:
227:
215:
203:
191:
178:
166:
149:
142:Hynca-Hooley
137:
126:
125:
121:
112:
100:
88:
74:
63:
45:
43:
31:
28:
93:Betacommand
66:HappyCamper
232:CloudNine
158:Isotope23
220:Wyoskier
128:Mitsukai
359:Trafton
346:Maikeru
334:Bart133
320:Bart133
171:Fan1967
105:Postdlf
101:Delete,
342:Delete
300:terjoe
282:(talk)
260:(talk)
252:Delete
240:Delete
216:Delete
179:Delete
167:Delete
150:Delete
138:Delete
89:Delete
75:Delete
46:delete
295:Compu
244:Jbamb
196:Zak.l
184:Cool3
16:<
268:Note
208:EdGl
154:WP:V
318:.
122:み使い
79:RJH
280:|
258:|
48:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.