333:
If there were a number of articles such as that used to cite the claim that "the towers have become a symbol for
Toronto's housing market crisis", there would be more of an argument for keeping this, but one use as an example is not enough to justify this, and what else I'm seeing is not especially
200:
406:
194:
161:
274:
134:
129:
138:
121:
302:
466:
Google mostly brings up articles about stuff happening in the buildings, noting about why they're notable. Toronto has lots of tall buildings, most aren't notable.
93:
398:
108:
381:
316:
288:
260:
241:
215:
182:
492:
475:
456:
418:
387:
362:
343:
322:
294:
266:
63:
176:
88:
81:
17:
172:
401:
Award for Best Tall
Buildings Americas for its use of sustainable architectural design. That would seem to meet criteria 2 of
222:
102:
98:
125:
427:
375:
310:
282:
254:
509:
40:
117:
69:
188:
370:
is an instance of an argument to avoid in deletion discussions, not a point in favour of keeping this article.
447:
371:
306:
278:
250:
367:
353:
stuff exists. It's a lot bigger and more western than tons of other non notable buildings with articles.
505:
36:
483:
Lots of buildings get nominated for awards by industry groups. I do not think this project is notable.
471:
208:
402:
232:
488:
441:
58:
350:
414:
239:. A condo complex in a city with a surfeit of such. Brief mentions in reputable media such as
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
504:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
453:
437:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
339:
236:
467:
358:
484:
53:
410:
155:
335:
354:
409:. Additionally, there are other sources in google books with coverage.
249:
units, but no in-depth coverage of the building or its architecture.
246:
500:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
430:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
151:
147:
143:
207:
436:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
221:
275:list of Architecture-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
512:). No further edits should be made to this page.
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
273:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
303:list of Ontario-related deletion discussions
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
399:Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat
300:
272:
397:. The building was nominated for the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
245:re: its allegedly huge number of
94:Introduction to deletion process
118:ÏCE Condominiums at York Centre
70:ÏCE Condominiums at York Centre
493:18:18, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
476:00:59, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
457:00:51, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
64:13:35, 17 September 2021 (UTC)
1:
419:22:52, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
388:00:58, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
363:00:28, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
344:23:04, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
323:20:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
295:20:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
267:20:38, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
529:
502:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
82:Articles for deletion
372:AleatoryPonderings
307:AleatoryPonderings
279:AleatoryPonderings
251:AleatoryPonderings
242:The Globe and Mail
459:
325:
297:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
520:
452:
450:
444:
435:
433:
431:
226:
225:
211:
159:
141:
79:
61:
56:
34:
528:
527:
523:
522:
521:
519:
518:
517:
516:
510:deletion review
460:
448:
442:
440:
426:
424:
168:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
526:
524:
515:
514:
496:
495:
478:
434:
423:
422:
421:
392:
391:
390:
347:
346:
331:leaning delete
327:
326:
298:
229:
228:
165:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
525:
513:
511:
507:
503:
498:
497:
494:
490:
486:
482:
479:
477:
473:
469:
465:
462:
461:
458:
455:
451:
445:
443:Locomotive207
439:
432:
429:
420:
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
389:
385:
384:
379:
378:
373:
369:
368:WP:OTHERSTUFF
366:
365:
364:
360:
356:
352:
349:
348:
345:
341:
337:
332:
329:
328:
324:
320:
319:
314:
313:
308:
304:
299:
296:
292:
291:
286:
285:
280:
276:
271:
270:
269:
268:
264:
263:
258:
257:
252:
248:
244:
243:
238:
234:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
501:
499:
480:
463:
425:
407:See page 267
394:
382:
376:
330:
317:
311:
289:
283:
261:
255:
240:
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
75:
49:
47:
31:
28:
334:important.
195:free images
506:talk page
468:Oaktree b
403:WP:NBUILD
233:WP:NBUILD
37:talk page
508:or in a
485:Alaney2k
428:Relisted
351:WP:other
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
411:4meter4
201:WP refs
189:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
481:Delete
464:Delete
336:Mangoe
247:Airbnb
237:WP:GNG
231:Fails
173:Google
139:delete
60:plicit
50:delete
216:JSTOR
177:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
489:talk
472:talk
449:talk
415:talk
395:Keep
359:talk
355:B137
340:talk
235:and
209:FENS
183:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
383:!!!
380:) (
377:???
318:!!!
315:) (
312:???
290:!!!
287:) (
284:???
262:!!!
259:) (
256:???
223:TWL
160:– (
491:)
474:)
454:🌀
438:🌀
417:)
405:.
386:)
361:)
342:)
321:)
305:.
293:)
277:.
265:)
203:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
487:(
470:(
446:-
413:(
374:(
357:(
338:(
309:(
281:(
253:(
227:)
219:·
213:·
205:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
175:(
167:(
164:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
55:✗
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.