Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/.70-150 Winchester - Knowledge

Source 📝

245:
Not a notable notable cartridge. It was a theoretical cartridge that probably never existed and was never chambered for a firearm. No widespread civilian use, adoption by any nation's armed forces, or use by police forces. Efforts to find reliable sources does not lead to
214: 167: 208: 114: 99: 174: 140: 135: 144: 127: 229: 196: 94: 87: 17: 108: 104: 190: 271: 40: 255: 69: 186: 131: 236: 267: 123: 75: 36: 251: 222: 202: 83: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
266:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
65: 57: 247: 53: 161: 61: 262:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
157: 153: 149: 221: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 274:). No further edits should be made to this page. 235: 8: 115:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 7: 24: 100:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 56:due to lack of participation. 1: 256:21:00, 27 November 2019 (UTC) 70:21:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC) 90:(AfD)? Read these primers! 291: 52:. Treating as an expired 264:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 88:Articles for deletion 124:.70-150 Winchester 76:.70-150 Winchester 105:Guide to deletion 95:How to contribute 54:proposed deletion 282: 240: 239: 225: 177: 165: 147: 85: 34: 290: 289: 285: 284: 283: 281: 280: 279: 278: 272:deletion review 182: 173: 138: 122: 119: 82: 79: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 288: 286: 277: 276: 243: 242: 179: 118: 117: 112: 102: 97: 80: 78: 73: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 287: 275: 273: 269: 265: 260: 259: 258: 257: 253: 249: 238: 234: 231: 228: 224: 220: 216: 213: 210: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 188: 185: 184:Find sources: 180: 176: 172: 169: 163: 159: 155: 151: 146: 142: 137: 133: 129: 125: 121: 120: 116: 113: 110: 106: 103: 101: 98: 96: 93: 92: 91: 89: 84: 77: 74: 72: 71: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 263: 261: 244: 232: 226: 218: 211: 205: 199: 193: 183: 170: 81: 49: 47: 31: 28: 246:anything.-- 209:free images 50:soft delete 268:talk page 248:Molestash 60:applies. 58:WP:REFUND 37:talk page 270:or in a 168:View log 109:glossary 39:or in a 215:WP refs 203:scholar 141:protect 136:history 86:New to 187:Google 145:delete 62:RL0919 230:JSTOR 191:books 175:Stats 162:views 154:watch 150:links 16:< 252:talk 223:FENS 197:news 158:logs 132:talk 128:edit 66:talk 237:TWL 166:– ( 254:) 217:) 160:| 156:| 152:| 148:| 143:| 139:| 134:| 130:| 68:) 250:( 241:) 233:· 227:· 219:· 212:· 206:· 200:· 194:· 189:( 181:( 178:) 171:· 164:) 126:( 111:) 107:( 64:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
proposed deletion
WP:REFUND
RL0919
talk
21:26, 4 December 2019 (UTC)
.70-150 Winchester

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
.70-150 Winchester
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.