Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/3D Video games - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

236:: Right now the article seems to simply a list of of games, but such a list would be endless and determining objective criteria for inclusion would be impossible. There might be a case for a more technical article, describing 3D modeling, motion capture, collision detection, etc., but that material probably exists elsewhere already.-- 200:
and would have to be rewritten almost entirely. It also fails to define what is a 3D game being substantially different from just 3D graphics inside a game. In aiddition there is no reason to note the that the term 3D game is used for such games given the limited number the article lists as it fails
656:
The number of items is not relevant. These are new types of games, and when reading about the technology, many will want to see what games have been made with them. It will grow in time. There is nothing wrong with this list, it meeting all purposes for a Knowledge (XXG) list, listing blue links
503:
Rename it to List of games made in RealD Cinema. Or List of games that require glasses to be seen in 3D. Since the term 3D is used in games to mean something totally different, most games these days labeled 3D as opposed to isometric, etc. at a glance some might be confused. We need to clarify
904:
does what a Knowledge (XXG) list is suppose to, and aids in navigation, linking to the sites of these games, which are referred to there and/or news media sources as stereoscopic games. It is the officially term for this sort of game. I have added in a clear definition at the start to show the
334:
Ok, I misunderstood the premise of the article. As you said, a different title would have been better. In any case, there still doesn't seem to be any actual article there, hence my not being able to tell what it's supposed to be about. I suggest that any actual content for this subject could be
791:, I would ask that an admin delte the link to 3D video games as the link isn't appropriate as mentioned before, 3D video games aren't traditionally sued to mean steroscopic. Moving it would get rid of one of the problems, but others still remain. 776:
Not really. The current article makes it unclear whether said games are completely stereoscopic or only certain scenes, whether they are stereoscopic for every platform or just some, whether they all require 3D-glasses or
165: 316:, but there's not much to merge to it from here: for example the opening statement is factually incorrect (there were a few stereoscopic games for old 8-bit platforms, not to mention the Virtual Boy.) 638:
This agrees with my point the table would not be an "endless" list :-) If I get some time I fill find the sources and expand the article before it is deleted. In the worst case perhaps I will ask for
504:
this in the article, and perhaps a rename. Are there other systems out there which allow games to be made in 3D? Didn't Sony Playstation 3 have some sort of holographic thing for one of its games?
312:, it seems the intention is to write an article about stereoscopic videogames that use 3D-glasses and the suchlike. If this is the criteria, then this would make a valid article - something like 905:
difference between this type of game and 3D games, that one of the complaints of the nominator. Any original research I have removed, that just two sentences, everything else easily clarified.
463:: I know there are at least 3 people proposing deletion but no discussion was made since the bot fixed the bug and listed the AFD so I will relist it so more people get a chance to participate. 1012:
That would be the same as deleting it. There is enough content for the article, plus this is a notable topic, more games being made and getting plenty of coverage in this new genre.
126: 407: 159: 541:
effects rather than a typical "3D" graphics projected onto 2D viewing area of a monitor that most people have at home. A real extension of such games is an interactive
571:
like "oon video-games are going to be in RealD Cinema", that 3D video games are not referring to graphics (in spite of evidence I have shown to the contrary).
274: 998:
is a good idea here since the nomination is being withdrawn; it can live as a stub and being improved in the main space rather than in the incubator. --
972:: Seeing as how the nomination is being withdrawn, and the current lack of content in the article, I'd like to suggest this article be moved to the 937:
per the developments the last few days. I'll agree that the rename and potential expansion of the definition of a "stereoscopic game" might work.
748:
You can click on the blue links to those games listed, and it says they are stereoscopic video games. You can easily verify they all exist.
48:, deletion discussion overtaken by editing of the article. Closing without prejudice against the nomination of the new article for deletion. 484:
kind of actual content. This is just 17 meaningless words followed by a short meaningless table. There's nothing here of even mild value.
545:
and TV, which are booming in the research and industry circles. Given the stereoscopy aspect, which may require wearing the 3D glasses (
93: 88: 206: 17: 97: 901: 849: 814:
List of video games featuring steroscopic components then? I'll see what their official websites and press releases call them.
205:
from any independant third-party source. Google search results show just the opposite - 3D video game is often used to for the
80: 537:(and expand): the topic is certainly notable; the article requires vast expansion of course. Note, 3D here is primarily about 180: 973: 725:
It still doesn't solve NPOV problems and the lack of any kind of verifiability, let alone notability of the subject matter.
147: 957: 802: 736: 626: 599: 419: 364: 220: 1052: 36: 866:
The article is short. A rename is easier to do than just copying the exact same information over to a new location.
788: 309: 567:
and the article is making several controversial claims, including the first 3-D video game and several that are
141: 1051:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
574:
Well presumably through editing and expansion these usually get fixed. This is a very minor NPOV violation. --
784: 381: 313: 1035: 1007: 985: 964: 941: 928: 889: 861: 837: 809: 771: 743: 720: 680: 651: 633: 606: 583: 558: 527: 493: 471: 453: 424: 393: 371: 348: 325: 299: 281: 262: 245: 227: 137: 62: 56: 857: 697:? Wouldn't that solve all the problems? How many support this name change, and how many object to it? 321: 995: 187: 489: 173: 84: 50: 639: 435: 938: 778: 296: 278: 389: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
568: 1013: 1003: 981: 952: 906: 867: 853: 815: 797: 749: 731: 698: 658: 647: 621: 594: 579: 554: 505: 414: 359: 344: 317: 241: 215: 153: 588:
In whose opinion? Your's? I don't believe its minor as it is a central crux of the article.
480:
Wow, when I skimmed the discussion above I thought we were talking about an article with
197: 549:
or others), the list is NOT endless today as it is not necessarily about traditional. --
485: 258: 76: 68: 564: 292: 202: 464: 446: 385: 114: 999: 977: 947: 792: 726: 643: 616: 589: 575: 550: 538: 354: 340: 336: 237: 210: 542: 254: 546: 440:
to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
1045:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
946:
Given recent developments, I wish to withdraw this nomination.
339:
until there is enough to split into a different article.--
353:
Still fails core policies with some controversial claims.
121: 110: 106: 102: 172: 615:
Edit: Also with 4 entries it's not enough for a list.
445:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 186: 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1055:). No further edits should be made to this page. 783:On another note, should the article be moved to 852:. I'd be happy to help start one from scratch. 291:per nom. With what there is currently, lack of 275:list of video game related deletion discussions 408:list of Software-related deletion discussions 8: 380:This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing 402: 308:- looking at the example game mentioned, 848:Yes, I think we should have an article, 406:: This debate has been included in the 273:: This debate has been included in the 900:The article is appropriate named now. 691:Can we all agree to simply rename it 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 24: 974:Knowledge (XXG):Article Incubator 902:List of stereoscopic video games 850:List of stereoscopic video games 694:List of stereoscopic video games 789:List of steroscopic video games 196:The article is largely made up 1036:23:56, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 1008:23:52, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 986:21:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 965:20:17, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 942:16:47, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 929:16:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC) 890:18:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 862:12:59, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 838:18:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC) 810:19:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 772:13:33, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 744:00:05, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 721:00:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 681:00:02, 26 September 2009 (UTC) 652:22:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 634:20:52, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 607:22:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 584:22:15, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 559:13:37, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 528:09:56, 25 September 2009 (UTC) 494:15:17, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 472:13:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 454:13:26, 23 September 2009 (UTC) 425:16:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 394:14:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 372:09:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 349:02:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 326:00:11, 16 September 2009 (UTC) 300:22:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 282:22:11, 12 September 2009 (UTC) 263:21:23, 11 September 2009 (UTC) 1: 246:01:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC) 228:21:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC) 207:the way in-game graphics look 253:This should be a category. 63:11:22, 2 October 2009 (UTC) 1072: 310:Sly 3: Honor Among Thieves 1048:Please do not modify it. 787:or, more appropriatly, 32:Please do not modify it. 785:Steroscopic video games 314:Stereoscopic video game 657:to aid in navigation. 384:). It is listed now. 46:nomination withdrawn 569:violations of NPOV 44:The result was 779:use other methods 456: 427: 423: 411: 284: 198:original research 1063: 1050: 1032: 1029: 1026: 1023: 1020: 1017: 961: 955: 950: 925: 922: 919: 916: 913: 910: 886: 883: 880: 877: 874: 871: 834: 831: 828: 825: 822: 819: 806: 800: 795: 768: 765: 762: 759: 756: 753: 740: 734: 729: 717: 714: 711: 708: 705: 702: 677: 674: 671: 668: 665: 662: 630: 624: 619: 603: 597: 592: 524: 521: 518: 515: 512: 509: 469: 451: 444: 442: 438: 417: 412: 368: 362: 357: 269: 224: 218: 213: 191: 190: 176: 124: 118: 100: 61: 59: 53: 34: 1071: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1059: 1053:deletion review 1046: 1030: 1027: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1015: 962: 959: 953: 948: 923: 920: 917: 914: 911: 908: 884: 881: 878: 875: 872: 869: 832: 829: 826: 823: 820: 817: 807: 804: 798: 793: 766: 763: 760: 757: 754: 751: 741: 738: 732: 727: 715: 712: 709: 706: 703: 700: 675: 672: 669: 666: 663: 660: 631: 628: 622: 617: 604: 601: 595: 590: 522: 519: 516: 513: 510: 507: 465: 447: 436: 433: 369: 366: 360: 355: 225: 222: 216: 211: 133: 120: 91: 75: 72: 57: 51: 49: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1069: 1067: 1058: 1057: 1041: 1040: 1039: 1038: 1010: 994:I don't think 989: 988: 967: 958: 944: 931: 897: 896: 895: 894: 893: 892: 846: 845: 844: 843: 842: 841: 840: 803: 782: 737: 689: 688: 687: 686: 685: 684: 683: 627: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 600: 531: 530: 497: 496: 458: 457: 443: 430: 429: 428: 399: 398: 397: 396: 377: 376: 375: 374: 365: 329: 328: 303: 285: 266: 265: 248: 221: 194: 193: 130: 77:3D Video games 71: 69:3D Video games 66: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1068: 1056: 1054: 1049: 1043: 1042: 1037: 1034: 1033: 1011: 1009: 1005: 1001: 997: 993: 992: 991: 990: 987: 983: 979: 975: 971: 968: 966: 963: 956: 951: 945: 943: 940: 936: 932: 930: 927: 926: 903: 899: 898: 891: 888: 887: 865: 864: 863: 859: 855: 851: 847: 839: 836: 835: 813: 812: 811: 808: 801: 796: 790: 786: 780: 775: 774: 773: 770: 769: 747: 746: 745: 742: 735: 730: 724: 723: 722: 719: 718: 696: 695: 690: 682: 679: 678: 655: 654: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 636: 635: 632: 625: 620: 614: 608: 605: 598: 593: 587: 586: 585: 581: 577: 573: 572: 570: 566: 565:no references 562: 561: 560: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 536: 533: 532: 529: 526: 525: 502: 499: 498: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 476: 475: 474: 473: 470: 468: 462: 455: 452: 450: 441: 439: 432: 431: 426: 421: 416: 409: 405: 401: 400: 395: 391: 387: 383: 379: 378: 373: 370: 363: 358: 352: 351: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 332: 331: 330: 327: 323: 319: 315: 311: 307: 304: 302: 301: 298: 294: 290: 286: 283: 280: 276: 272: 268: 267: 264: 260: 256: 252: 249: 247: 243: 239: 235: 232: 231: 230: 229: 226: 219: 214: 208: 204: 203:verifiability 199: 189: 185: 182: 179: 175: 171: 167: 164: 161: 158: 155: 152: 149: 146: 143: 139: 136: 135:Find sources: 131: 128: 123: 116: 112: 108: 104: 99: 95: 90: 86: 82: 78: 74: 73: 70: 67: 65: 64: 60: 54: 47: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1047: 1044: 1014: 969: 934: 907: 868: 816: 750: 699: 693: 692: 659: 640:userfication 539:stereoscopic 534: 506: 500: 481: 477: 466: 460: 459: 448: 434: 403: 305: 293:verifability 288: 287: 270: 250: 233: 195: 183: 177: 169: 162: 156: 150: 144: 134: 45: 43: 31: 28: 996:WP:INCUBATE 854:Marasmusine 337:Stereoscopy 318:Marasmusine 160:free images 970:Suggestion 933:Change to 563:There are 58:barbarian 543:3D cinema 486:Propaniac 335:added to 52:Skomorokh 939:MuZemike 547:anaglyph 437:Relisted 297:MuZemike 279:MuZemike 127:View log 467:JForget 449:JForget 386:DumbBOT 306:Comment 166:WP refs 154:scholar 94:protect 89:history 1000:Mokhov 978:RDBury 960:Jinnai 805:Jinnai 739:Jinnai 644:Mokhov 629:Jinnai 602:Jinnai 576:Mokhov 551:Mokhov 478:Delete 382:step 3 367:Jinnai 341:RDBury 289:Delete 251:Delete 238:RDBury 234:Delete 223:Jinnai 138:Google 122:delete 98:delete 1031:Focus 924:Focus 885:Focus 833:Focus 767:Focus 716:Focus 676:Focus 523:Focus 420:cont. 413:-- - 181:JSTOR 142:books 125:) – ( 115:views 107:watch 103:links 16:< 1004:talk 982:talk 935:keep 858:talk 648:talk 642:. -- 580:talk 555:talk 535:Keep 501:Keep 490:talk 482:some 461:Note 404:Note 390:talk 345:talk 322:talk 271:Note 259:talk 242:talk 174:FENS 148:news 111:logs 85:talk 81:edit 976:.-- 415:2/0 255:BUC 188:TWL 1006:) 984:) 860:) 650:) 582:) 557:) 492:) 410:. 392:) 347:) 324:) 295:. 277:. 261:) 244:) 209:. 168:) 113:| 109:| 105:| 101:| 96:| 92:| 87:| 83:| 55:, 1028:m 1025:a 1022:e 1019:r 1016:D 1002:( 980:( 954:内 949:陣 921:m 918:a 915:e 912:r 909:D 882:m 879:a 876:e 873:r 870:D 856:( 830:m 827:a 824:e 821:r 818:D 799:内 794:陣 781:. 764:m 761:a 758:e 755:r 752:D 733:内 728:陣 713:m 710:a 707:e 704:r 701:D 673:m 670:a 667:e 664:r 661:D 646:( 623:内 618:陣 596:内 591:陣 578:( 553:( 520:m 517:a 514:e 511:r 508:D 488:( 422:) 418:( 388:( 361:内 356:陣 343:( 320:( 257:( 240:( 217:内 212:陣 192:) 184:· 178:· 170:· 163:· 157:· 151:· 145:· 140:( 132:( 129:) 119:( 117:) 79:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
 Skomorokh
barbarian 
11:22, 2 October 2009 (UTC)
3D Video games
3D Video games
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images
WP refs
FENS
JSTOR
TWL
original research
verifiability
the way in-game graphics look

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.