306:. I see what the problem is. It indeed seems not discussed at all in any of the references. The only reliable references to be found are that of the FDA, which does not really add much to this article anyway. It is interesting to see there is a promotional site which, despite different text, cites more or less the same references as this wikipedia article. While it may indeed be in use as an anabolic steroid, without better references I change my vote to 'delete'.
325:- Frankly, I am not an expert in the area of this specific compound, but I've done my checks yesterday, when this was posted at WP:CHEM, and could not find (i) evidence for this compound in the cited refs, (ii) evidence for this compound in journal articles (WoS, some chemical locators). I guess the structure formula was drawn mechanically, from the formal name. No matter how good such an article looks, it has to be deleted.
288:, but improve referencing. It is discussed on several sites as an anabolic steroid, suggested as a dietary component, and is discussed by the FDA, thus notability is clearly provided. However, maybe it is better to discuss NorDHEAs all together in this article?
368:. The subject of the article doesn't appear in the citations, and I find exactly one casual mention on searching ("specific abundant metabolites of 19-nor-5-androsten-3,17-dione are 19-nordehydroandrosterone and 19-nordehydroepiandrosterone."
205:
which is against policy. A search of the scientific literature turns up only two articles that mention this chemical compound. Neither article supports either the notability of the compound or the veracity of the article's content. (See
162:
156:
117:
90:
85:
94:
344:
77:
266:
I can see that this one's going to be tough, and require research by multiple editors. My contribution to the double-checking, eliminating one: This isn't in
122:
207:
177:
144:
81:
251:
383:
17:
395:
359:
334:
315:
297:
279:
261:
223:
138:
59:
134:
73:
65:
330:
184:
410:
256:
36:
409:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
197:
in any of the references listed. The entirety of the text of this article, written primarily by one editor, is
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
210:
for details). In all, except for the data in the infobox, the article fails to meet
Knowledge's standards for
326:
150:
246:
380:
391:
170:
219:
355:
275:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
369:
311:
293:
241:
202:
267:
55:
215:
376:
351:
271:
233:
198:
111:
372:
237:
211:
307:
289:
50:
403:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
208:
Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Chemicals#19NorDehydroepiandrosterone
107:
103:
99:
169:
193:
As far as I can tell, the named chemical compound is
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
413:). No further edits should be made to this page.
201:unsupported by the references. It constitutes
183:
8:
345:list of Science-related deletion discussions
339:
343:: This debate has been included in the
375:. The bulk of the article is unsourced
7:
24:
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
60:00:06, 3 September 2010 (UTC)
74:19-Nordehydroepiandrosterone
66:19-Nordehydroepiandrosterone
396:07:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
360:00:58, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
335:00:29, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
316:17:10, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
298:16:55, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
280:15:50, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
262:12:52, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
224:12:26, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
430:
268:FiehnLab's metabolite list
406:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
232:- I couldn't find any
270:as far as I can see.
195:not mentioned at all
371:). Not enough for
44:The result was
362:
348:
327:Materialscientist
199:original research
421:
408:
387:
349:
259:
254:
249:
244:
188:
187:
173:
125:
115:
97:
34:
429:
428:
424:
423:
422:
420:
419:
418:
417:
411:deletion review
404:
388:
385:
257:
252:
247:
242:
130:
121:
88:
72:
69:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
427:
425:
416:
415:
399:
398:
384:
363:
337:
320:
319:
318:
282:
264:
191:
190:
127:
123:AfD statistics
68:
63:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
426:
414:
412:
407:
401:
400:
397:
393:
389:
382:
378:
374:
370:
367:
364:
361:
357:
353:
346:
342:
338:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
302:
301:
300:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
263:
260:
255:
250:
245:
239:
236:to establish
235:
231:
228:
227:
226:
225:
221:
217:
213:
212:verifiability
209:
204:
200:
196:
186:
182:
179:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
143:
140:
136:
133:
132:Find sources:
128:
124:
119:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
71:
70:
67:
64:
62:
61:
57:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
405:
402:
365:
340:
322:
303:
285:
284:
229:
194:
192:
180:
174:
166:
159:
153:
147:
141:
131:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
157:free images
352:• Gene93k
203:synthesis
381:Radagast
220:Edgar181
118:View log
272:Uncle G
163:WP refs
151:scholar
91:protect
86:history
366:Delete
323:Delete
304:Delete
243:Derild
230:Delete
135:Google
95:delete
46:delete
379:. --
377:WP:OR
308:Nageh
290:Nageh
234:WP:RS
214:. --
178:JSTOR
139:books
112:views
104:watch
100:links
48:. --
16:<
392:talk
373:WP:N
356:talk
341:Note
331:talk
312:talk
294:talk
286:Keep
276:talk
238:WP:N
171:FENS
145:news
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
56:talk
51:Cirt
350:--
185:TWL
120:•
116:– (
394:)
358:)
347:.
333:)
314:)
296:)
278:)
253:21
248:49
240:.
222:)
216:Ed
165:)
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
58:)
390:(
386:3
354:(
329:(
310:(
292:(
274:(
258:☼
218:(
189:)
181:·
175:·
167:·
160:·
154:·
148:·
142:·
137:(
129:(
126:)
114:)
76:(
54:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.