579:, it looks like we haven't had a 5th tier season article for a while now. Is that because of NSEASONS or because none of them would pass GNG? I would also agree that many League Two and probably many League One seasons don't receive anything more than bare minimum match reporting and transfer reporting and many of them, in their current state, are just stats articles and don't actually follow NSEASONS' guidance of
559:
season can have an article if it meets the notability requirements. So we need to determine exactly what level/type of coverage meets that requirement. I would suggest as I mentioned above that if the requirement is "there must have been articles written reviewing the season as a whole", then many
554:
I suspect a wider discussion is needed concerning NSEASONS which (if we disregard all the stuff about US college sport) effectively consists of the single sentence "Articles can be created on individual seasons of teams in top professional leagues, as these articles almost always meet the notability
574:
I can definitely agree that NSEASONS is horrendously inadequate and unclear on this. I would also agree that each editor has their own interpretation of how to apply GNG to a football season. That was shown in recent AfDs for
Newport, Leyton Orient and Doncaster Belles seasons to name the most
542:
would be sufficient to substantiate the article with. I imagine many will say "yes" and many would say "no". Last year, many articles with similar coverage were deleted but, admittedly, it depends on who turns up for the AfD and AfD is not an exact science.
198:
597:. The National League gets national coverage, and there's no reason why we can't have a season article for these clubs based on sourcing alone. This particular article is more poorly sourced, but the season as a whole should still pass
192:
132:
127:
136:
576:
119:
159:
520:
I concur - how many club seasons are truly the subject of analysis of the season as a whole, even at
Premier League level? Requiring that sort of sourcing is daft, IMO --
254:
316:
792:, although not a particularly notable season in historical terms, I think it may scrape past general notability but would be helped by some improvements to sourcing.
492:
The test for seasons isn't whether there's analysis of the season as a whole, it's whether the season was consistently significantly covered, which is the case here.
123:
91:
213:
106:
180:
115:
67:
845:
826:
798:
784:
768:
749:
706:
689:
672:
651:
620:
588:
569:
549:
529:
511:
483:
453:
432:
407:
392:
364:
342:
325:
307:
270:
246:
61:
174:
680:- clearly passes GNG in my opinion. I really don't understand what sort of greater depth of coverage other editors are looking for..... --
170:
743:
615:
506:
302:
86:
79:
17:
428:
220:
560:
non-League articles would pass but many EFL articles would fail, yet the latter currently get a "per NSEASONS" free pass....... --
477:
as well but it's not much. I'd be interested to see if anyone can find any form of analysis or recap about this season as a whole.
333:
387:
820:
100:
96:
461:- none of the sources in the article even come close to showing enough depth for GNG. I found a couple of match reports in
400:- fails GNG as far as I can see. Lots of sources does not mean "significant coverage" - it all appears be ROUTINE/NOTNEWS.
186:
807:
715:
862:
40:
359:
697:
Article could be improved, but there is enough to show the season can pass GNG, NSEASONS can't supersede GNG.
736:
607:
581:
Team season articles should consist mainly of well-sourced prose, not just statistics and lists of players.
498:
294:
685:
565:
525:
404:
858:
668:
424:
354:
264:
240:
36:
660:
594:
373:
281:
230:
449:
57:
474:
382:
206:
470:
466:
823:
731:
602:
493:
289:
288:
with coverage from the BBC and
Cambridge newspapers, even though the sourcing could be improved.
663:– not a top professional league, the club was playing non-league football that season (per nom)
539:
284:
is the stupidest goddamn policy, and in any case isn't exclusionary. The season clearly passes
764:
681:
561:
521:
401:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
857:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
841:
664:
647:
420:
258:
234:
598:
441:
416:
285:
702:
445:
53:
583:
544:
478:
377:
337:
320:
817:
759:
Only a small amount of non-club sources, nothing suggesting this is a notable topic.
778:
760:
153:
837:
794:
643:
698:
538:
Then I suppose it would boil down to whether the weekly coverage, such as
853:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
659:
per GNG (lack of depth per
Spiderone), and in accordance with
810:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
718:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
577:
Category:National League (English football) seasons by team
233:
as the club was playing non-league football that season.
149:
145:
141:
205:
816:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
729:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
467:"Inspiration fails Cambridge in their hour of need"
336:'s list of association football-related deletions.
219:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
865:). No further edits should be made to this page.
315:Note: This discussion has been included in the
253:Note: This discussion has been included in the
360:Stay alert! Control the virus! Save lives!!!!
255:list of Football-related deletion discussions
8:
555:requirements." This strongly suggests that
317:list of England-related deletion discussions
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
642:, Knowledge (XXG) is not a sports almanac.
332:Note: This discussion has been included in
836:- Meets GNG per the reasons stated above.
776:meets WP:GNG, per all the above comments.
314:
252:
726:Not quite consensus on the GNG point yet.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
116:2008–09 Cambridge United F.C. season
68:2008–09 Cambridge United F.C. season
440:well-sourced article seems to pass
24:
92:Introduction to deletion process
1:
473:. There is a bit of coverage
471:"Devon is hell for Cambridge"
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
882:
846:11:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)
827:12:08, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
799:22:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
785:09:48, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
769:21:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
750:21:16, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
707:11:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)
690:21:09, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
673:19:47, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
652:14:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
621:20:29, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
62:07:58, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
589:10:00, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
575:memorable examples. From
570:09:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
550:09:24, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
530:08:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
512:23:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
484:22:36, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
454:12:51, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
433:20:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
408:20:21, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
393:13:46, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
365:12:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
343:12:30, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
326:12:24, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
308:12:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
271:11:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
247:11:10, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
855:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
465:which show some depth
80:Articles for deletion
334:WikiProject Football
724:Relisting comment:
829:
752:
540:this match report
363:
345:
328:
273:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
873:
815:
813:
811:
781:
746:
741:
734:
728:
721:
719:
618:
610:
593:It's because of
586:
547:
509:
501:
481:
390:
385:
380:
357:
355:The Rambling Man
340:
331:
323:
305:
297:
267:
261:
243:
237:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
881:
880:
876:
875:
874:
872:
871:
870:
869:
863:deletion review
830:
806:
804:
779:
753:
744:
737:
732:
714:
712:
614:
606:
584:
545:
505:
497:
479:
388:
383:
378:
338:
321:
301:
293:
265:
259:
241:
235:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
879:
877:
868:
867:
849:
848:
814:
803:
802:
801:
787:
771:
727:
722:
711:
710:
709:
692:
675:
654:
636:
635:
634:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
628:
627:
626:
625:
624:
623:
533:
532:
515:
514:
487:
486:
456:
435:
410:
395:
367:
347:
346:
329:
311:
310:
275:
274:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
878:
866:
864:
860:
856:
851:
850:
847:
843:
839:
835:
832:
831:
828:
825:
822:
819:
812:
809:
800:
797:
796:
791:
788:
786:
783:
782:
775:
772:
770:
766:
762:
758:
755:
754:
751:
748:
747:
742:
740:
735:
725:
720:
717:
708:
704:
700:
696:
693:
691:
687:
683:
679:
676:
674:
670:
666:
665:— Alalch Emis
662:
658:
655:
653:
649:
645:
641:
638:
637:
622:
619:
617:
611:
609:
604:
603:SportingFlyer
600:
596:
592:
591:
590:
587:
582:
578:
573:
572:
571:
567:
563:
558:
553:
552:
551:
548:
541:
537:
536:
535:
534:
531:
527:
523:
519:
518:
517:
516:
513:
510:
508:
502:
500:
495:
494:SportingFlyer
491:
490:
489:
488:
485:
482:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
436:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
411:
409:
406:
403:
399:
396:
394:
391:
386:
381:
375:
371:
368:
366:
361:
356:
352:
349:
348:
344:
341:
335:
330:
327:
324:
318:
313:
312:
309:
306:
304:
298:
296:
291:
290:SportingFlyer
287:
283:
280:
277:
276:
272:
268:
262:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
238:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
854:
852:
833:
805:
793:
789:
777:
773:
756:
738:
730:
723:
713:
694:
682:ChrisTheDude
677:
656:
639:
613:
605:
580:
562:ChrisTheDude
556:
522:ChrisTheDude
504:
496:
462:
458:
437:
412:
397:
369:
350:
300:
292:
278:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
661:WP:NSEASONS
595:WP:NSEASONS
421:KingSkyLord
374:WP:NSEASONS
282:WP:NSEASONS
260:REDMAN 2019
236:REDMAN 2019
231:WP:NSEASONS
193:free images
446:JonnyDKeen
54:Fenix down
859:talk page
790:Weak keep
739:Phightins
695:Weak Keep
585:Spiderone
546:Spiderone
480:Spiderone
463:The Times
353:per GNG.
339:Spiderone
322:Spiderone
37:talk page
861:or in a
808:Relisted
716:Relisted
429:contribs
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
780:Lugnuts
761:Eldumpo
459:Comment
405:Snowman
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
838:NapHit
795:Bungle
757:Delete
657:Delete
644:Stifle
640:Delete
599:WP:GNG
442:WP:GNG
417:WP:GNG
398:Delete
379:Number
370:Delete
286:WP:GNG
229:Fails
171:Google
137:delete
699:Govvy
402:Giant
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
842:talk
834:Keep
818:Seem
774:Keep
765:talk
703:talk
686:talk
678:Keep
669:talk
648:talk
566:talk
526:talk
475:here
469:and
450:talk
438:Keep
425:talk
415:per
413:Keep
372:per
351:Keep
279:Keep
266:talk
242:talk
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
50:keep
557:any
221:TWL
158:– (
844:)
824:ez
821:pl
767:)
733:Go
705:)
688:)
671:)
650:)
601:.
568:)
528:)
452:)
444:.
431:)
427:|
419:.
376:.
319:.
269:)
257:.
245:)
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
840:(
763:(
745:!
701:(
684:(
667:(
646:(
616:C
612:·
608:T
564:(
524:(
507:C
503:·
499:T
448:(
423:(
389:7
384:5
362:)
358:(
303:C
299:·
295:T
263:(
239:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.