1625:
secondary sources on the web and in print is unquestionably wikipedic and passes our standards in pretty much every way possible. As usual in a list discussion we such silly apples and oranges comparisons as songs (the major musical element of a game) compared with a hypothetical "List of Rock Band underwear, available on eBay" that not only would no one seriously suggest be created in the first place, but that no one would suggest because unlike this article, it is not something discussed in dozens of reliable secondary sources. Or we wind up with the usually incivility by someone with neither knowledge nor interest in this topic dismissing others as mere "fanboys". This article passes
646:). If this were just a normal video game soundtrack (where the music is simply background noise), that's one thing, but the music game genre has altered music licensing in the last few years, making the inclusion of a song in a game a more significant event than just the signing of a licensing deal. And again, I point out that technically it is possible to make this list all sourced to numerous secondary sources each week, but adding (at minimum) 52 separate sources when one single primary one will do is unnecessary; using Harmonix' own site in this manner is using a reliable, online source. --
1213:. If Rock Band had, say, fifteen playable tracks, it would be very reasonable to have a list of them in the main encyclopedia article. The fact that it has however-many-hundred doesn't change that, it simply means that the list needs splitting out and organising, which is what these pages achieve. This is a perfect example of ancillary information that is encyclopedic, but would not generally appear in a paper encyclopedia due to lack of space. With no such constraint, and given that this information is indeed all sourced, I view this as a perfectly valid set of list articles. ~
1356:- You appear to use this link only to pad your argument. Useful/not useful is a matter of opinion, and is typically not "useful" in an AFD discussion. Yes, there will be sources more useful than the article...but isn't that because the nature of WP is to be a summation of a topic using multiple fleshed out sources? Yep, there's another place on the web with this list. Guess what, there's also places on the web that have soundtrack listings, movie summaries, cast lists, and sports stats. Yet all of those things are summarized and maintained here on WP are they not?
1340:- Since this is not a policy regarding what can/cannot belong in lists, let's look at the lead. Have you argued verifibility? No, there's plenty of reliable third party sources. Have you argued original research? No, there's no synthesis here...no more than any other article that combines several sources into a list. Have you argued neutrality? Well, you accuse those who have created the list of doing so simply as advertising, which only accomplishes a breach in the idea of
1429:
in this with well over 800 songs between all the lists over the last several years, as opposed, say, how Guitar Hero has released multiple games with multiple on-disk songs. The point that I ask for clarification here is, given that some lists of songs have been determined to be appropriate, why are people drawing the line here? That may help to understand what those seeking deletion would rather see. --
1633:, i.e. we are not just a general encyclopedia, but also an almanac, specialized encyclopedia, and gazetteer. The purpose of this list is to cover an influential element of a major series that has relevance to not just the video game industry, but also the music industry. Once someone says things like "go somewhere else," well, we can go somewhere else for an article on
1362:- How is this a copyright violation? It's a soundtrack. There's nothing more you can do with a soundtrack than list the songs and artists. Where you could possibly have concern is in the information surrounding the list itself, but since that is pulled from sources and inserted where appropriate, there is no more issue with quotes/references than any other article.
1594:, which we have yet again this time around. Anytime at least a dozen editors in good standing determine a subject is notable, the subject does not become less notable. Renominations are not intended for articles that were previously kept, only those that were previously deleted. For example, if we had a deletion discussion back in 1971 for
1453:
soundtrack lists are almost all FL status, and although I know that just because they're FL doesn't mean this one should be, at the same time it's useful information that is not difficult to piece together into one place. To those who say it's ADVERT or NOPRICES, we used to include difficulty levels
1195:
I'm sorry, when did soundtracks become OR? This list, along with the other Rock Band and Guitar Hero lists (many of which have been upgraded to
Featured List status) is basically a soundtrack for what songs are available to download, along with vital information such as artist, genre, how the song is
529:
results that are for next week's DLC; yes, not every hit is a reliable source, but there's certainly are more than a few (1UP.com, IGN) that are. This demonstrates that independent sources place value on this information) If it made sense, we could source the entirety of this to those sources, but it
916:
Nom's rationale is flawed. None of the information is original research, having come from multiple sources. The argument that it follows primary sources only is irrelevant as when up-coming tracks are previewed in other sources they are used so long as deemed notable. This listing is no different
615:
Oh for heaven's sake, that sounds appallingly pretentious. People "researching music" wont be reading year-by-year lists of downloadable songs for $ RANDOMGAME on
Knowledge (XXG). When I research music I read books and reliable online sources. Knowing that a song is available for download for a game
1624:
or "I don't know about it" or "It's just not important me", none of which are legitimate reasons for deletion, because there are no legitimate reasons. This discriminate article that lists songs playable in a major game series on multiple systems that are verified and anaylzed in numerous reliable
1428:
particular situation, that's edging on indiscriminate. But here, on these specific lists, these are songs that
Harmonix has tracked and placed into the series, each week receiving third-party coverage by gaming sources of their availability. It is only the fact that Harmonix has remained proficient
1070:
Exactly; if this list is deleted how is anyone going to know what songs there are for download? It takes a heck of a lot longer to sift through the list within the game than on here; in the game there is no "Find" feature where you can just type in the name of your favorite band and see all of the
453:
The material is exactly of the nature that belongs on
Knowledge (XXG). See discographies for various bands, book lists for various authors, episode lists for various TV shows for examples of other pages listing similar kind of information. There are many thousands of such pages, the claim that this
1619:
024 (October 2009): 55; etc. That which is verified in multiple reliable sources in separate articles that not only list, but comment on the choice of specific songs, focusing on the songs specifically rather than on the game as a whole, meets any common sense or valid interpretation of
Knowledge
1566:
From that article: "By decree of
Ptolemy III of Egypt, all visitors to the city were required to surrender all books and scrolls, as well as any form of written media in any language in their possession which, according to Galen, were listed under the heading "books of the ships". Official scribes
1350:- You appear to only be applying this guideline since there the article includes prices. So in that regard, it would appear you would have no issue if the prices are removed. That is something that could be discussed within the article talk page...not something that an AFD would hae to force out.
1153:
per Masem. The list demonstrates adequate sourcing and is well-organized and clear about its inclusion criteria. Incidentally, we are doing a great job covering this subject area - this is probably the best page of its type on the internet. While we can agree or disagree on whether this list meets
690:
articles related to the Rock Band soundtrack) were strongly kept in a snowball decision the last time, and the nominator has brought nothing new to the discussion to demonstrate why this AfD should be discussed yet again. I also question why the nominator felt it neccesary to single out 2009 when
1492:
As above, I would often use this page as reference as I find it is more up to date and holds more information than any fan site ever does or ever could. I would usually visit this page at least once a week due to the reasons I have already stated. I feel that removing this page will inconvenience
663:
Guy's oversimplified argument could be applied to other instances of music as well. For example, people "researching music" won't be reading lists of songs for $ RANDOMMOVIE on
Knowledge (XXG). Therefore soundtracks become irrelevant. Also, it seems rather pretentious to assume that those with
1598:
that closed as delete as a hoax or something, well, okay that would be a reasonable close, but due to what happened in the past year, no serious editor would not contest that article despite the earlier discussion. By contrast, 41 years from now, no serious editor will say we should delete the
1015:
Many people (including myself) use this particular entry to make informed decisions on what songs to purchase. Rock Band is not a "random" video game. It is one of the most important music games of the era and has been very influential. There are so many more lists that are less informative and
802:
Yes yes, this was no different than the generic "argument" raised in the initial discussions the last time these sets of articles were nominated. But that is the problem with this nomination. There has been no change in the articles format/content/structure/meaning since the lost nom, and the
876:
While lists may not be in accordance with an encyclopedia, Knowledge (XXG) transcends that. This list of
Complete Songs is no different than Complete Episode listings for most television shows with Knowledge (XXG) Pages. In addition, I use this page every week to review songs I am considering
88:
1370:"Articles considered advertisements include those that are solicitations for a business, product or service, or are public relations pieces designed to promote a company or individual. Wikispam articles are usually noted for sales-oriented language and external links to a commercial website."
739:
since the consensus of the WP community is that WP should be a storage place for all published information in case there is a nuclear war, gigantic solar flare, or alien invasion and all the rest of the
Internet and all libraries are destroyed leaving WP alone to preserve human civilisation.
222:
are either about the game generally or drawn from sources which are not independent, being drawn from press releases. The Rock Band series is notable. The fact you can download songs for it is significant to the Rock Band game. 2009 in sport, yes. 2009 in fashion, perhaps. but 2009 in
2041:
This page absolutely belongs on wiki. This list is useful and accurate. There are many lists on wiki that should be deleted before this. Merging the list maybe. Anyone who thinks wiki is a real encyclopedia is insane, most of the articles on here would not be in an encyclopedia.
1806:. Why was this even put up for deletion? This is an incredibly well kept and updated article. It is preposterous to even put it up for debate for deletion. It stays. I regularly check this article for the latest DLC and it has been the most convenient source for DLC for years.
917:
than a listing of television episodes. These articles support the base article, and provide the reader with the information they desire as an expansion to the parent article. Nominator also paints a false picture regarding the consensus of the previous set of AfDs. --
1939:
Deleting this article is absolutely erroneous. I watch this page like a hawk, as do many other Rock Band owners. It is exactly the kind of page that makes
Knowledge (XXG) such a great source of information. I cannot believe this is even being considered for deletion.
573:, Knowledge (XXG) is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Not everything that is true, or even verifiable, belongs in Knowledge (XXG). As the nominator says, this may belong on a fan wiki, but it doesn't really have a place in an encyclopedia.
1419:). By extension, there seems to be justification for these lists, but to some point, I can understand the concern about indiscriminate that has been raised. It is important to note that the Rock Band series is getting another outlet for songs, through the
83:
2012:
I use this page quite frequently to review songs to purchase as most people have mentioned. It is a clean list which follows the same collective information such as an episode list. Lists are okay on Knowledge (XXG), this one should be no different.
187:
1787:. This is a regularly updated soundtrack for a music video game. The fact that some people use it to inform their purchases is irrelevant. As long as there is an entry for the Rock Band series, there should be a list of songs associated with it.
721:- The nominator's reasons for deletion misrepresent the actual discussion that took place during previous round of AFDs, and seems to be an argument towards a closed AFD as opposed to any new reasoning for why this discussion should be reopened. --
1620:(XXG)'s ever changing policies and guidelines, which is why no serious editor will post another bolded "delete" in this discussion after my post. This article belongs on Knowledge (XXG). The only delete votes we are seeing are nothing more than
282:
277:
286:
1300:
I don't think there's a copyvio here. These lists have been developed over time as songs are announced for availability; at worst we're talking a database (yes, I know that opens other questions) which in general cannot be copyrighted.
269:
1423:
which is all user-generated content. Those editors involved in these are still debating whether to including a list of such because there is no necessary quality control by a single source (it's all peer-review) - in other words, in
686:, the article is no different than any other soundtrack (video game, movie, or otherwise). The division into different years (2007, 2008, 2009, 2010) was done due to the ever expanding size of the article. The article (along with
1169:
The most compelling argument in the nominator's opening statement is that the title sucks, which I'll whole-heartedly agree with. However, I fail to see how the list counts as original research, given that everything is sourced...
1837:, possibly with collapsible lists, but deletion is unreasonable according to the community standards. If editors don't like this kind of article on Knowledge (XXG), then as far as I understand it their problem lies with
590:), in addition to these games having an otherwise larger impact on the music industry, this is not just flat out information for information purposes, but a means to allow those researching music to follow the trends. --
420:
415:
374:
369:
328:
323:
115:
110:
1992:
I am also a frequent user of this information and am glad that it has been assembled for me in such an easy to find fation. I appreciate the work of the people who keep this list up to date and would not want to see it
424:
378:
332:
119:
1720:
This is regularly updated content that is of great use to thousands of people making decisions on purchases, it violates nothing. It's a discography for a game, go delete all the other discographies out there first.
998:
Although there are many places to find this information, the split lists of all years contributes to easier access to finding the songs that are already available for the game and for the songs in the upcoming week.
407:
361:
315:
102:
1599:
article that we thought should be kept now, because it has somehow become less notable. Notability, as subjective and anti-encyclopedic of a concept as it is, only increases. Indeed, if anything, the songs of
1372:
Since the only evidence of any sort of "sales" that you seem to think exists is the pricing information, than a "Strong Delete" seems like a rather harsh resoution when the policy you toss out explicity states:
1567:
then swiftly copied these writings, some copies proving so precise that the originals were put into the library, and the copies delivered to the unsuspecting owners." Clearly it foreshadowed Knowledge (XXG).
273:
181:
147:
616:
tells us precisely nothing about the song or its significance, it just tells us that the song is reasonably popular and the game publishers were able to agree a mutually satisfactory licensing deal.
1868:
1603:
have only become more important since the previous discussion. In any event, most of this article is unoriginal research as it is and can be sourced through reliable secondary sources including
265:
1196:
available, and when it became available. By nominating this list for deletion, you're basically saying all the peer reviews all the aforementioned lists went through were faulty and useless.
526:
848:
You again make the mistake of grouping the arguments of all those in favor with those who made the above arguments. I could do the same and oversimplfy the opposing viewpoint as being
411:
365:
319:
106:
811:
new being brought to the table in terms of nomation reasons. Hence why I suggested earlier that the nominator readup on previous AFD discussions before restating the same argument. --
231:
and similar arguments and the fact that the list had become unwieldy. The way to deal with unwieldy original research is not to split it out into smaller chunks of original research.
142:
1318:
Excellent demonstration of your ability to throw policy at the wall. But let's go through these one at a time shall we? And actually discuss why you feel these merit application.
982:
Teancum's and TRTX's arguments is best described why. Absolutely 0% of this information is original research considering it is kept in sync with the actual Rock Band music store.--
936:
per the arguments resulting in the previous snowball keep AfD. Certainly not original research, as the announcement of new DLC is covered at every video game news source I follow.
2057:
2031:
2002:
1981:
1955:
1929:
1906:
1888:
1858:
1815:
1796:
1776:
1731:
1710:
1687:
1666:
1641:
1576:
1561:
1543:
1523:
1502:
1482:
1463:
1441:
1387:
1313:
1295:
1250:
1229:
1205:
1187:
1161:
1141:
1112:
1080:
988:
971:
946:
926:
892:
862:
843:
817:
795:
777:
758:
749:
727:
709:
670:
658:
629:
602:
582:
564:
542:
513:
258:
244:
67:
1607:, which frequently features articles commenting on the weekly downloadable content, as well as magazine articles: “Rock Band’s Five Most Unexpectedly Rockin’ Downloadable Song,”
525:
announced and then subsequently tracked by Harmonix as a primary source, but will always be covered by multiple sources once they've made that announcement. (See, for example,
700:
696:
692:
403:
357:
311:
98:
73:
1510:
The purpose of this list seems to be little more than a consumer guide listing, which is not the purpose of Knowledge (XXG). If you want to know what songs you can buy for
1375:"When an article on an otherwise encyclopedic topic has the tone of an advertisement, the article can often be salvaged by rewriting it in a neutral point of view."
1016:
important than this one. Just because it doesn't affect you any, doesn't mean it should be deleted. It is not original research and is very organized and cited. --
956:
202:
1678:, obviously. Plainly notable, does not violate any policies, issues with potential original research within the article should not be addressed with deletion.
169:
1473:. Or, rather, go through and delete every band's discography, every writer's bibliography, etc. This is useful information, I reference this page very often.
552:
803:
nominator has reopened the discussions with no new arguments (instead only refuteing arguments made in the last discussion which was closed as "Keep" under
1530:
But what if all the rest of the Internet is destroyed and Knowledge (XXG) is the only place left? Then this information will be lost forever. Please see:
1867:
single page (which would be daunting both to load and to maintain), which is why the list is currently four individual articles that a transcluded on
1552:
I see that its story is not so simple as I had thought. But still it is a good example of the need to protect information in multiple storage places.
643:
163:
1154:
various deletion criteria, there's no doubt that our readers, who care nothing for our notability guidelines, will be ill-served by this deletion.
530:
doesn't here; all the information can be sourced from one place, and one ref is much more valuable than what would need to be 52 separate ones. --
1966:
I frequent this page at least once a week! It keeps me informed as to what to expect from XBox Live! This page is extremely useful. Please keep!
1416:
1412:
159:
1338:; thus, they are equally subject to Knowledge (XXG)'s content policies, such as verifiability, no original research and neutral point of view."
703:. Perhaps more familiarity with the history of discussions with these articles would help them understand the reason this article exists. --
943:
1973:
1947:
1768:
898:
884:
472:
461:
209:
249:
I am also nominating the following related pages because they are essentially the same thing, so if one is nominated, they all should be.
1994:
1494:
1749:
1056:
906:
480:
17:
1238:
504:
587:
Because there is a noted connection between appearing as DLC and the impact on a band or song sales as a result (see, for example,
1092:
as an indiscriminate collection of non-notable information. Fails our standards in pretty much every way possible, in my opinion.
175:
1697:. The OR argument is confusing, as everything on these pages is readily sourced. The only other real delete argument here is
1745:
1106:
1052:
1036:
1404:
1290:
1158:
2074:
1399:- To those above with deletes, I would like to point out the fact that it has been established that the lists of songs
827:
36:
454:
sort of content does not belong on Wikipidea seems to be against established practice. 22:56 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1920:
It's simple to maintain, and is used by many people. It's existence does not negatively affect the wiki in any way.
1761:
This is the most up-to-date and complete list of new songs I have found. I regularly check this site for updates.
1071:
songs by them. Not to mention it takes a lot longer to load most videogames than it does to load Knowledge (XXG)...
822:
One pile-on of game fans does not make an article encyclopaedic. And I did read the previous debate. It was full of
1408:
1201:
1103:
1701:, as people somehow seem to think that video game information isn't "real-world" enough to be in an encyclopedia.
1411:.) It is also considered appropriate that these include the list of songs added through downloadable content (eg
940:
877:
purchasing, and new songs released on a weekly basis. Probably my most frequently visited Knowledge (XXG) page.
1654:
1630:
2073:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
1977:
1951:
1830:
1772:
1698:
1621:
1381:
So again you seem to be going for the easiest solution vs. actually discussing any potential improvements. --
902:
888:
853:
849:
476:
465:
1998:
1498:
1683:
1287:
1155:
1004:
2053:
1969:
1943:
1764:
1727:
1347:
1263:
1197:
1024:
880:
457:
1572:
1557:
1539:
745:
588:
228:
1549:
1531:
1519:
1459:
1076:
1000:
498:
1846:
1833:-style arguments cannot be relied upon to sustain a vote to delete. At best, I can see an argument for
1283:
1048:
1032:
1792:
1925:
1811:
1274:
than the corresponding Knowledge (XXG) lists (hint: it's sortable by release date). That raises some
1132:
indiscriminate? Why not just say "per nom"? You have failed to point out what exactly is flawed. --
937:
1359:
1275:
823:
2047:
2023:
768:
I don't know why we have a list on this. We should probably also nominate the other lists as well.
195:
1474:
1365:
1353:
1279:
1271:
1044:
1028:
1788:
1741:
1679:
1595:
1100:
983:
1834:
1626:
1329:
1259:
1662:
1568:
1553:
1535:
1478:
1420:
1137:
967:
922:
741:
578:
560:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1591:
1017:
804:
49:
1902:
1881:
1854:
1657:. It's something I haven't thought about before (wikilinked it in your comment as well). --
1515:
1455:
1180:
1072:
773:
664:
interest in music wouldn't also be interested in exploring new ways to enjoy that music. --
493:
254:
1842:
1341:
1921:
1877:
1807:
1706:
1437:
1309:
1176:
654:
598:
538:
89:
Articles for deletion/2009 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series (2nd nomination)
1125:
219:
2043:
2018:
1454:
for each track; that wasn't needed. I don't see why this is an issue for some people.
1246:
1838:
1826:
1611:(January 2009): 58; “Rock Band’s Five Most Disappointingly Boring Downloadable Song,”
1129:
1737:
1722:
1638:
1095:
838:
832:
624:
618:
239:
233:
1266:. Too specific for a general encyclopedia. These lists are entirely reproduced from
1658:
1133:
963:
918:
574:
556:
441:
395:
349:
303:
136:
1898:
1850:
1637:
as well, but that does not mean we should not also cover it here. Sincerely, --
1450:
769:
250:
1872:
1702:
1430:
1302:
1214:
1171:
856:
since nothing new has been brought to the discussion in favor of deletion. --
792:
755:
647:
591:
531:
53:
1383:
1242:
858:
813:
723:
705:
666:
1893:
Oh I've got no qualms with it as it stands per se. I'm just saying I'd be
1634:
84:
Articles for deletion/2009 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
1267:
1449:. It's not that far-fetched of a compilation of information. The
521:
This is not OR. The coverage of what songs come out each week is
2067:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1825:. Well-sourced, clearly notable according the the standards of
1869:
Complete list of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
266:
Complete list of downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
1841:
itself. The appropriate place to voice such concerns is at
1368:- Another carelessly flung out accusation. The language is
807:. That's the problem with this nom. There is literally
1863:
Merging isn't an option; even if collapsible, it'd be a
437:
433:
429:
391:
387:
383:
345:
341:
337:
299:
295:
291:
227:? That belongs on a fan-wiki. Previously kept based on
132:
128:
124:
1897:
receptive to merge arguments than to deletion votes. -
194:
1282:
for a company performed by undiscerning fanboys; see
1403:
with these games are considered appropriate (see eg
1237:. What a silly idea. Why don't we create an artcile
1590:as an earlier discussion closed mere months ago by
404:
2010 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
358:
2008 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
312:
2007 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
208:
99:
2009 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
74:
2009 in downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
2077:). No further edits should be made to this page.
553:list of video game related deletion discussions
1239:List of Rock Band underwear, available on eBay
8:
225:downloadable songs for the Rock Band series
957:list of Lists-related deletion discussions
951:
830:and similar arguments (just as this is)..
644:Cultural impact of the Guitar Hero series
955:: This debate has been included in the
551:: This debate has been included in the
1417:List of songs in The Beatles: Rock Band
1413:List of songs in Guitar Hero World Tour
81:
638:The point is still there: these games
1615:(January 2009): 58; “Rock Band DLC,”
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
1278:issues as well. It's also a case of
218:The few parts of this which are not
1268:http://www.rockband.com/music/songs
80:
1617:PlayStation: The Official Magazine
1613:PlayStation: The Official Magazine
1609:PlayStation: The Official Magazine
24:
642:affected the music industry (see
1631:Knowledge (XXG)'s First pillar
1:
989:23:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
972:22:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
947:21:49, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
927:21:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
893:20:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
844:22:21, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
818:21:51, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
796:19:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
778:17:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
759:19:24, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
750:17:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
728:16:19, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
710:16:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
630:22:18, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
603:16:34, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
583:15:50, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
565:15:43, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
543:14:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
514:13:25, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
259:20:20, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
245:09:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
1655:Knowledge (XXG):Five pillars
1405:List of songs in Guitar Hero
1336:are Knowledge (XXG) articles
1270:, which will always be more
852:and especially in this case
2094:
1409:List of songs in Rock Band
1128:, well laid out page with
1007:) 0:05, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
2058:05:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
2032:03:21, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
2003:22:26, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
1982:08:13, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
1956:03:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
1930:23:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1907:19:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1889:18:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1859:17:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1816:15:59, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1797:06:42, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1777:04:54, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1732:17:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
1711:07:42, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
1688:05:09, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
1667:16:07, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
1642:15:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
1577:16:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1562:16:18, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1544:16:06, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
1524:05:15, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
1503:20:35, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1483:17:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1464:18:47, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1442:18:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1388:18:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1314:18:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1296:17:57, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1251:17:14, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1230:13:41, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1206:04:56, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
1188:21:40, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
1162:16:18, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
1142:14:22, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
1113:08:36, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
1081:16:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
863:05:10, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
671:05:46, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
659:05:35, 1 March 2010 (UTC)
68:08:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
2070:Please do not modify it.
787:; does not belong in an
691:articles also exist for
527:this list of google news
32:Please do not modify it.
1653:- good point regarding
1629:and is consistent with
79:AfDs for this article:
1750:few or no other edits
1550:Library of Alexandria
1532:Library of Alexandria
1514:, go somewhere else.
1057:few or no other edits
1020:11:46, Feb 28 (EST)
907:few or no other edits
481:few or no other edits
1752:outside this topic.
1548:Hmmm. After reading
1334:"Stand-alone lists '
1059:outside this topic.
909:outside this topic.
483:outside this topic.
1397:Comment and inquiry
1342:assuming good faith
2030:
1596:Avatar (2009 film)
1156:Christopher Parham
1130:plenty of coverage
828:WP:OTHERCRAPEXISTS
490:entirely per nom.
44:The result was
2029:
2014:
1972:comment added by
1946:comment added by
1767:comment added by
1753:
1462:
1421:Rock Band Network
1293:
1110:
1060:
1041:
1027:comment added by
974:
960:
910:
883:comment added by
842:
628:
567:
484:
460:comment added by
243:
2085:
2072:
2061:
2039:Very Strong Keep
2028:
2026:
2021:
2015:
1990:VERY STRONG KEEP
1984:
1964:VERY STRONG KEEP
1958:
1887:
1884:
1779:
1735:
1734:
1458:
1434:
1306:
1291:
1227:
1198:Crazydiamond1to9
1186:
1183:
1111:
1098:
1042:
1040:
1021:
986:
961:
896:
895:
836:
770:Kevin Rutherford
651:
622:
595:
547:
535:
512:
509:
508:
501:
496:
470:
469:
445:
427:
399:
381:
353:
335:
307:
289:
251:Kevin Rutherford
237:
213:
212:
198:
150:
140:
122:
65:
34:
2093:
2092:
2088:
2087:
2086:
2084:
2083:
2082:
2081:
2075:deletion review
2068:
2051:
2024:
2019:
2016:
1967:
1941:
1882:
1875:
1762:
1725:
1432:
1304:
1215:
1181:
1174:
1093:
1022:
984:
878:
754:Wait, what? —
719:Additional Note
649:
593:
533:
506:
505:
499:
494:
491:
455:
418:
402:
372:
356:
326:
310:
280:
264:
155:
146:
113:
97:
94:
77:
60:
54:
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2091:
2089:
2080:
2079:
2063:
2062:
2056:comment added
2035:
2034:
2006:
2005:
1986:
1985:
1974:70.104.179.242
1960:
1959:
1948:130.101.249.55
1933:
1932:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1831:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1819:
1818:
1800:
1799:
1781:
1780:
1769:67.169.254.249
1755:
1754:
1730:comment added
1714:
1713:
1699:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1691:
1690:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1645:
1644:
1622:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1580:
1579:
1527:
1526:
1505:
1486:
1485:
1467:
1466:
1444:
1393:
1392:
1391:
1390:
1379:
1378:
1377:
1363:
1357:
1351:
1345:
1322:
1321:
1320:
1319:
1316:
1253:
1232:
1208:
1190:
1164:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1116:
1115:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1062:
1061:
1009:
1008:
992:
991:
976:
975:
949:
930:
929:
911:
899:67.163.175.196
885:67.163.175.196
870:
869:
868:
867:
866:
865:
854:WP:KEEPLISTING
850:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
799:
798:
781:
780:
763:
762:
761:
733:
732:
731:
730:
713:
712:
680:
679:
678:
677:
676:
675:
674:
673:
661:
633:
632:
608:
607:
606:
605:
568:
545:
516:
485:
473:87.194.122.160
462:87.194.122.160
447:
446:
400:
354:
308:
216:
215:
152:
148:AfD statistics
93:
92:
91:
86:
78:
76:
71:
58:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2090:
2078:
2076:
2071:
2065:
2064:
2059:
2055:
2049:
2045:
2040:
2037:
2036:
2033:
2027:
2022:
2017:-- Tommy Boy
2011:
2008:
2007:
2004:
2000:
1996:
1995:99.240.225.50
1991:
1988:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1971:
1965:
1962:
1961:
1957:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1938:
1935:
1934:
1931:
1927:
1923:
1919:
1916:
1915:
1908:
1904:
1900:
1896:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1885:
1879:
1874:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1861:
1860:
1856:
1852:
1848:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1821:
1820:
1817:
1813:
1809:
1805:
1802:
1801:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1786:
1783:
1782:
1778:
1774:
1770:
1766:
1760:
1757:
1756:
1751:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1733:
1729:
1724:
1719:
1716:
1715:
1712:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1693:
1692:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1680:Croctotheface
1677:
1674:
1673:
1668:
1664:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1649:
1648:
1647:
1646:
1643:
1640:
1636:
1632:
1628:
1623:
1618:
1614:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1597:
1593:
1589:
1586:
1585:
1578:
1574:
1570:
1565:
1564:
1563:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1546:
1545:
1541:
1537:
1533:
1529:
1528:
1525:
1521:
1517:
1513:
1509:
1506:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1495:92.21.246.212
1493:many people.
1491:
1488:
1487:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1469:
1468:
1465:
1461:
1457:
1452:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1427:
1422:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1406:
1402:
1398:
1395:
1394:
1389:
1386:
1385:
1380:
1376:
1371:
1367:
1364:
1361:
1358:
1355:
1352:
1349:
1348:WP:NOTCATALOG
1346:
1343:
1339:
1335:
1331:
1328:
1327:
1326:
1325:
1324:
1323:
1317:
1315:
1311:
1307:
1299:
1298:
1297:
1294:
1289:
1285:
1281:
1277:
1273:
1269:
1265:
1264:WP:NOTCATALOG
1261:
1257:
1256:Strong delete
1254:
1252:
1248:
1244:
1240:
1236:
1233:
1231:
1228:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1212:
1209:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1194:
1191:
1189:
1184:
1178:
1173:
1168:
1165:
1163:
1160:
1157:
1152:
1149:
1148:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1131:
1127:
1123:
1120:
1119:
1118:
1117:
1114:
1108:
1105:
1102:
1097:
1091:
1088:
1087:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1058:
1054:
1050:
1046:
1038:
1034:
1030:
1026:
1019:
1014:
1011:
1010:
1006:
1002:
1001:Nascarfan1964
997:
994:
993:
990:
987:
981:
978:
977:
973:
969:
965:
958:
954:
950:
948:
945:
942:
939:
935:
932:
931:
928:
924:
920:
915:
912:
908:
904:
900:
894:
890:
886:
882:
875:
872:
871:
864:
861:
860:
855:
851:
847:
846:
845:
840:
835:
834:
829:
825:
821:
820:
819:
816:
815:
810:
806:
801:
800:
797:
794:
790:
786:
783:
782:
779:
775:
771:
767:
764:
760:
757:
753:
752:
751:
747:
743:
738:
735:
734:
729:
726:
725:
720:
717:
716:
715:
714:
711:
708:
707:
702:
698:
694:
689:
685:
682:
681:
672:
669:
668:
662:
660:
656:
652:
645:
641:
637:
636:
635:
634:
631:
626:
621:
620:
614:
613:
612:
611:
610:
609:
604:
600:
596:
589:
586:
585:
584:
580:
576:
572:
569:
566:
562:
558:
554:
550:
546:
544:
540:
536:
528:
524:
520:
517:
515:
510:
502:
497:
489:
486:
482:
478:
474:
467:
463:
459:
452:
449:
448:
443:
439:
435:
431:
426:
422:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
389:
385:
380:
376:
371:
367:
363:
359:
355:
351:
347:
343:
339:
334:
330:
325:
321:
317:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
293:
288:
284:
279:
275:
271:
267:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
247:
246:
241:
236:
235:
230:
226:
221:
211:
207:
204:
201:
197:
193:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
174:
171:
168:
165:
161:
158:
157:Find sources:
153:
149:
144:
138:
134:
130:
126:
121:
117:
112:
108:
104:
100:
96:
95:
90:
87:
85:
82:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
64:
63:
62:
51:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
2069:
2066:
2038:
2009:
1989:
1963:
1936:
1917:
1894:
1864:
1822:
1803:
1784:
1758:
1726:— Preceding
1717:
1694:
1675:
1650:
1616:
1612:
1608:
1604:
1600:
1587:
1569:Steve Dufour
1554:Steve Dufour
1536:Steve Dufour
1511:
1507:
1489:
1470:
1446:
1425:
1400:
1396:
1382:
1374:
1369:
1337:
1333:
1255:
1234:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1210:
1192:
1166:
1150:
1126:well sourced
1121:
1089:
1067:
1012:
995:
979:
952:
933:
913:
873:
857:
831:
812:
808:
789:encyclopedia
788:
784:
765:
742:Steve Dufour
736:
722:
718:
704:
687:
683:
665:
639:
617:
570:
548:
522:
518:
487:
450:
248:
232:
229:WP:ITSUSEFUL
224:
217:
205:
199:
191:
184:
178:
172:
166:
156:
57:
56:
55:
45:
43:
31:
28:
2052:—Preceding
2010:Strong Keep
1968:—Preceding
1942:—Preceding
1937:Strong Keep
1918:Strong Keep
1847:WP:PROPOSAL
1804:Strong Keep
1785:Strong Keep
1763:—Preceding
1748:) has made
1588:Speedy keep
1516:WesleyDodds
1490:Strong Keep
1471:Strong Keep
1451:Guitar Hero
1447:Strong keep
1284:WP:NOPRICES
1193:Strong Keep
1124:- How is a
1073:Black Yoshi
1068:Strong Keep
1055:) has made
1023:—Preceding
1013:Strong Keep
996:Strong Keep
985:F-22 Raptör
980:Strong Keep
905:) has made
879:—Preceding
874:Strong Keep
684:Strong Keep
519:Stronb Keep
479:) has made
456:—Preceding
182:free images
1993:removed.--
1922:CheddarBBQ
1808:Doshindude
1401:as shipped
1360:WP:COPYVIO
1276:WP:COPYVIO
824:WP:ILIKEIT
2044:jvfulcher
1601:Rock Band
1512:Rock band
1366:WP:ADVERT
1354:WP:USEFUL
1280:WP:ADVERT
1272:WP:USEFUL
964:• Gene93k
1970:unsigned
1944:unsigned
1765:unsigned
1746:contribs
1738:mcai3db3
1723:mcai3db3
1639:A Nobody
1635:Napoleon
1627:WP:SALAT
1330:WP:SALAT
1260:WP:SALAT
1096:Huntster
1053:contribs
1037:contribs
1025:unsigned
881:unsigned
507:belonger
495:Treasury
458:unsigned
143:View log
2054:undated
1728:undated
1659:Teancum
1651:Comment
1592:WP:SNOW
1475:Daytman
1456:Anthony
1134:Teancum
1122:Comment
1045:LtFrost
1029:LtFrost
1018:LtFrost
941:megalon
919:Teancum
809:nothing
805:WP:SNOW
575:Nyttend
557:MrKIA11
421:protect
416:history
375:protect
370:history
329:protect
324:history
283:protect
278:history
188:WP refs
176:scholar
116:protect
111:history
1899:Thibbs
1851:Thibbs
1843:WP:RFC
1835:merger
1789:Jollyv
1605:Kotaku
1508:Delete
1460:(talk)
1235:Delete
1159:(talk)
1090:Delete
785:Delete
766:Delete
699:, and
571:Delete
488:Delete
425:delete
379:delete
333:delete
287:delete
160:Google
120:delete
1873:EVula
1845:(see
1703:Oren0
1172:EVula
839:Help!
793:Coren
791:. —
756:Coren
625:Help!
523:first
442:views
434:watch
430:links
396:views
388:watch
384:links
350:views
342:watch
338:links
304:views
296:watch
292:links
240:Help!
220:WP:OR
203:JSTOR
164:books
137:views
129:watch
125:links
16:<
2048:talk
1999:talk
1978:talk
1952:talk
1926:talk
1903:talk
1895:more
1878:talk
1865:huge
1855:talk
1849:). -
1839:WP:N
1827:WP:N
1823:Keep
1812:talk
1793:talk
1773:talk
1759:Keep
1742:talk
1718:Keep
1707:talk
1695:Keep
1684:talk
1676:Keep
1663:talk
1573:talk
1558:talk
1540:talk
1520:talk
1499:talk
1479:talk
1433:ASEM
1426:this
1384:TRTX
1305:ASEM
1292:ping
1288:Pcap
1258:per
1247:talk
1243:DVdm
1211:Keep
1202:talk
1177:talk
1167:Keep
1151:Keep
1138:talk
1077:talk
1049:talk
1033:talk
1005:talk
968:talk
953:Note
944:2000
938:Maxa
934:Keep
923:talk
914:Keep
903:talk
889:talk
859:TRTX
814:TRTX
774:talk
746:talk
737:Keep
724:TRTX
706:TRTX
701:2010
697:2008
693:2007
667:TRTX
650:ASEM
640:have
594:ASEM
579:talk
561:talk
549:Note
534:ASEM
477:talk
466:talk
451:Keep
438:logs
412:talk
408:edit
392:logs
366:talk
362:edit
346:logs
320:talk
316:edit
300:logs
274:talk
270:edit
255:talk
196:FENS
170:news
133:logs
107:talk
103:edit
61:warm
46:Keep
2050:)
1880://
1876://
1179://
1175://
962:--
833:Guy
688:all
619:Guy
555:.
500:Tag
234:Guy
210:TWL
145:•
141:– (
50:NAC
48:. (
2001:)
1980:)
1954:)
1928:)
1905:)
1886://
1871:.
1857:)
1829:.
1814:)
1795:)
1775:)
1744:•
1736:—
1709:)
1686:)
1665:)
1575:)
1560:)
1542:)
1534:.
1522:)
1501:)
1481:)
1440:)
1415:,
1407:,
1332:-
1312:)
1301:--
1286:.
1262:,
1249:)
1241:?
1204:)
1185://
1140:)
1094:—
1079:)
1051:•
1043:—
1039:)
1035:•
999:--
970:)
959:.
925:)
897:—
891:)
826:,
776:)
748:)
695:,
657:)
601:)
581:)
563:)
541:)
511:─╢
492:╟─
471:—
468:)
440:|
436:|
432:|
428:|
423:|
419:|
414:|
410:|
394:|
390:|
386:|
382:|
377:|
373:|
368:|
364:|
348:|
344:|
340:|
336:|
331:|
327:|
322:|
318:|
302:|
298:|
294:|
290:|
285:|
281:|
276:|
272:|
257:)
190:)
135:|
131:|
127:|
123:|
118:|
114:|
109:|
105:|
52:)
2060:.
2046:(
2025:♪
2020:♪
1997:(
1976:(
1950:(
1924:(
1901:(
1883:☯
1853:(
1810:(
1791:(
1771:(
1740:(
1705:(
1682:(
1661:(
1571:(
1556:(
1538:(
1518:(
1497:(
1477:(
1438:t
1436:(
1431:M
1344:.
1310:t
1308:(
1303:M
1245:(
1225:a
1223:c
1221:z
1219:a
1217:m
1200:(
1182:☯
1136:(
1109:)
1107:c
1104:@
1101:t
1099:(
1075:(
1047:(
1031:(
1003:(
966:(
921:(
901:(
887:(
841:)
837:(
772:(
744:(
655:t
653:(
648:M
627:)
623:(
599:t
597:(
592:M
577:(
559:(
539:t
537:(
532:M
503:►
475:(
464:(
444:)
406:(
398:)
360:(
352:)
314:(
306:)
268:(
253:(
242:)
238:(
214:)
206:·
200:·
192:·
185:·
179:·
173:·
167:·
162:(
154:(
151:)
139:)
101:(
59:S
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.