Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/2011–12 FK Željezničar season - Knowledge

Source 📝

1214:- most likely we are all aware that Knowledge isn't for collecting and archiving statistical data, but to simply reiterate that certainly isn't much of an argument here. I am not sure how exactly we are suppose to be aware or how we "know" that Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina became "professional" only since 2016? That's absolutely incorrect! I had dispute several years ago over issue of this particular league professional status with some user (with admin's prerogatives) claiming how league wasn't professional, although I don't remember his exact arguments mine were quite simple - beside the fact that Yugoslavian First League became fully pro in the 1960s, and that all successor leagues (Slovenia, Serbia (w/t Montenegro at the time), Macedonia, Croatia, and Bosnia) changed absolutely nothing in regulating of their own respective competitions, I was able, and I still am, to find online various written official documents, academic research and legal papers, or simply online text documents discussing regulation of professionalism in Croatia, Serbia and most importantly Bosnia. Now, I really hope that we already moved beyond doubts on professional status of all leagues successors of former Yugoslav First League since that time, and that we learned that Premier League of Bosnia, just like top flights in all these other countries of former Yugoslavia, is professional since 1960s. So my only problem, though easily solvable, would be lack of prose in some of the articles that I checked, and (maybe) need for (perpetual) improvement of refed sources, but notability shouldn't be questioned just because some don't like it, or aren't interested, or consider country's competition unimportant and too obscure from his/her perspective. We should keep Seasons and tagged them if needed properly for improvement.-- 977:. I don't see the lack of professional status as being particularly germane here. While NSEASONS does suggest that teams in top professional leagues qualify for individual season articles, it doesn't require professionalism. Instead, it has a fairly lengthy section considering notability for a specific subset of non-professional sport (i.e., US college sport) which concludes that there are certain circumstances in which they can be notable. In this particular case, we have a national championship winning season in both the country's and the world's most popular sport, with a league that was ranked higher by UEFA than some fully professional leagues. Lack of professionalism should not be a factor here. However, the article in its current state is nothing but stats and records, which certainly is a factor. This should be redirected to the parent article for now, but without prejudice on recreation if anyone cares to research and write a proper prose version of the article. 1094:, however, nobody is going to delete them as they all have some significance to the team's history. The argument that these seasons weren't "professional" is flawed as the Top 4 teams automatically qualified for European competition, meaning that UEFA recognized the winners as the domestic champions and allowed them (and the 3 teams that finished below them) to compete in arguably, the most professional soccer competition in the world. I also agree with 1516:
discussion about whether top professional applies to the semi-pro 5th level of English football - but that focused more on "top" than "professional". Attempts have been made to make it fully-professional, but have been reverted in the past. In particular, the current wording dates back to 2010, before which it was only top leagues - looking at the accompanying discussion, there doesn't seem to be any consensus that it's fully-professional.
1374:
I'm relisting this even though I feel the stronger arguments are for delete. The arguments for keep are lengthy but ultimately not closely linked to guidelines. Rather than focussing on whether or not the league is professional or not, I would encourage editors to cite specific sources that show both
1515:
Digging through various archives and previous discussions, I don't see any conclusion that the "professional" in NSEASONS means fully-professional. This has come up before, such as in the previous AFD, where even you didn't refute this for the month after the same claim was made. I do see historic
60:
This closure should not be taken as affirmation that any of these articles are notable, more that a decision on such a large number is now very hard to make. I would recommend any editor who still questions the notability of any of these articles to renominate individually and for editors in those
56:
only says club seasons for top professional leagues can normally be created because they usually satisfy GNG. Furthermore it also says that articles should be mainly sourced prose and in most instances here they are not. However, some work has been done on some articles which indicates GNG, which
1409:
It's been slow going, not least because I haven't been on Knowledge as much, but there's plenty of Bosnian language content to update these articles with once the archives of some of these websites are found. Maybe not all of these seasons are notable, but I'm starting to
1052: 1110:
have articles about nearly every season that they have ever played, and some of those articles about a specific season would fail WP:NOSTATS. So instead, I recommend that we fix the glaring issues in these articles, so that they aren't considered "delete-worthy" again.
1533:, significantly improving the article. Articles should be improved, as GNG sources are not difficult to find - which shouldn't be a surprise for teams that played at the top level, were historically fully-professional, and are currently fully-professional. 1039:, which also allows for top level articles. The Željezničar articles would be fine if they had properly referenced prose. I've added a very brief bit of sourced prose to the 2011–12 season, which they won the Bosnian double and which clearly passes 232: 91: 1525:, which is primarily, so we don't waste lots of time debating the notability of topics that invariably are notable, with GNG sources available. As noted in the previous comments, six additional GNG sources have now 52:. I'm closing this as no consensus as this is fast turning into a mess. There are a number of keep votes but they concern themselves mainly with whether the league is professional or not. That is not relevant, 1556:
Bosnian league is a direct successor of the Yugoslav first league where for example FK Zeljeznicar reached semi finals of UEFA Cup 1986 season. Bosnian league is a professional league and is a member of UEFA.
1090:, as technically, these were all significant seasons in these clubs' history. Technically speaking, most seasons of any sports team (notably those where they finish mediocre in all competitions) would fail 226: 86: 795: 790: 922: 799: 57:
complicates matters, although number are just stat dumps with a couple of references. Finally, the nominators decision to try to withdraw the nomination very late on further complicates things.
841: 836: 519: 514: 473: 468: 158: 153: 1469:
is not correct, and in contrast to the AFD discussion in 2014. The league may have not been fully professional until 2016, but it was professional - and that's what NSEASONS is referring to.
845: 782: 749: 744: 565: 560: 523: 477: 162: 753: 569: 828: 506: 460: 145: 736: 552: 703: 698: 657: 652: 611: 606: 427: 422: 381: 376: 335: 330: 289: 284: 192: 707: 661: 615: 431: 385: 339: 293: 185: 1185:. Nomination appears incorrect - it's not difficult to quickly find significant Bosnian media coverage for some of these seasons - even some English coverage such as 690: 644: 598: 414: 368: 322: 276: 902: 786: 832: 510: 464: 247: 149: 740: 556: 214: 132: 117: 945:, Knowledge is a not a stats collection. Through I am open to merger to a single article that could pass notability, if someone can make such a case. -- 1593: 1566: 1542: 1506: 1478: 1441: 1399: 1354: 1337: 1224: 1206: 1177: 1149: 1120: 1078: 1023: 1005: 986: 957: 934: 914: 894: 878: 778: 70: 1458: 1530: 1129: 824: 502: 456: 141: 76: 732: 548: 208: 204: 694: 648: 602: 418: 372: 326: 280: 1136:
given that the team won the domestic double and competed in the Europa League. The lack of prose is not a reason for deletion given that
1436: 1073: 254: 1241:"LEGAL STRUCTURE OF FOOTBALL CLUBS IN YUGOSLAVIA AND CROATIA WITH EMPHASIS ON THE EMPLOYMENT STATUS OF PROFESSIONAL FOOTBALL PLAYERS" 1137: 885:
as the leagues seem to be professional and will probably not break GNG. I reckon the best reasoning is to withdraw this nomination.
1172: 112: 105: 17: 686: 640: 594: 410: 364: 318: 272: 995: 220: 1186: 966: 267:
as the league wasn't an professional league until 2016-17. I will also be nominating these articles for the same reason.
126: 122: 1387:
concerns are valid. Had there not been such a large number of articles up for deletion, I would have closed this now.
1575: 1363: 1128:- I think these AfDs may need to be broken down into smaller batches. For example, I suspect the main nomination, 1610: 1350: 40: 1333: 1428: 1065: 1503: 1020: 1002: 982: 1240: 1606: 1116: 1098:
that the arguments presented as to why the articles should be deleted are flawed. Many other teams like
36: 1086:- These seasons were all seasons in top-flight of Bosnian football, and deleting them would go against 1589: 1395: 1346: 1035:
has absolutely nothing to do with the professionalism of the league, which is a rough guideline from
930: 910: 890: 874: 66: 1492: 1329: 1222: 1167: 240: 1562: 1522: 1488: 1450: 1423: 1384: 1380: 1190: 1158: 1095: 1060: 1056: 1044: 974: 970: 53: 1453:
isn't met. However this is not true. This also came up in the previous 2014 AFD. NSEASONS says
1500: 1303: 1263: 1091: 1036: 1017: 999: 978: 951: 101: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
1605:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
1255: 1145: 1112: 1107: 1585: 1538: 1474: 1462: 1391: 1202: 926: 906: 886: 870: 62: 1418:. Also, I'm convinced not every Bosnian Premier League team's season would be notable on 1215: 1162: 1055:. Basically, I'm a weak keep for most of these, even though all of them currently fail 1053:
Knowledge:Articles for deletion/1979–80 Notre Dame Fighting Irish men's basketball team
1558: 1496: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1376: 1328:
Because some of this articles was already nominated for deletion, about 5 years ago.
1194: 1133: 1087: 1048: 1040: 1032: 264: 1345:- per above, especially per KingSkyLord. These are professional teams now anyways. 1103: 1099: 947: 61:
discussions to focus on GNG, not simply whether the league is professional or not.
1455:
Articles can be created on individual seasons of teams in top professional leagues
862: 816: 770: 724: 678: 632: 586: 540: 494: 448: 402: 356: 310: 179: 1141: 1457:. And these articles are (I think) all for the top level professional soccer - 1534: 1470: 1198: 1306: 1266: 1259: 1197:
is easily met. Articles should be improved and expanded, not deleted.
1521:
Beyond that, let's go back to the reason to have standards such as
1601:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
1288: 1043:. There was a college seasons article I nominated for failing 1578:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
1366:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
1422:
grounds, but Željezničar at the very least is well covered.
923:
list of Bosnia and Herzegovina-related deletion discussions
1379:
and that sourced prose can be added to these articles per
1449:
There are claims in the some of the delete comments that
1526: 1193:
guideline may not be met, it's not relevant given that
858: 854: 850: 812: 808: 804: 766: 762: 758: 720: 716: 712: 674: 670: 666: 628: 624: 620: 582: 578: 574: 536: 532: 528: 490: 486: 482: 444: 440: 436: 398: 394: 390: 352: 348: 344: 306: 302: 298: 175: 171: 167: 1467:
the league wasn't an professional league until 2016-17
239: 1584:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 1390:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 998:'s list of association football-related deletions. 92:
Articles for deletion/2011–12 FK Željezničar season
1047:which was kept since the season ultimately passed 1016:- per NOTSTATS and NSEASONS. No need to redirect. 1487:Not correct - when it comes to 'professional' at 1414:the "parent" article, and it should clearly pass 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 1613:). No further edits should be made to this page. 921:Note: This discussion has been included in the 901:Note: This discussion has been included in the 87:Articles for deletion/2011–12 FK Sarajevo season 1248:Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 903:list of Football-related deletion discussions 253: 8: 133:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 1461:. The claim in the nomination statement by 994:Note: This discussion has been included in 1289:"Nogometni profesionalci u udruženom radu" 920: 900: 1031:The nomination itself has a fatal flaw - 1459:Premier League of Bosnia and Herzegovina 1231: 84: 948:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 7: 83: 1239:Iveta, Vladimir (27 August 2018). 779:2014–15 HŠK Zrinjski Mostar season 733:2014–15 FK Borac Banja Luka season 549:2013–14 FK Borac Banja Luka season 24: 1051:I'm trying to find. I think it's 118:Introduction to deletion process 1287:Kovačić, Davor (28 June 2016). 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1493:player notability requirements 1491:, it actually means (like our 1: 1531:2011–12 FK Željezničar season 1296:Časopis za suvremenu povijest 1130:2011–12 FK Željezničar season 825:2015–16 FK Željezničar season 503:2013–14 FK Željezničar season 457:2012–13 FK Željezničar season 142:2011–12 FK Željezničar season 77:2011–12 FK Željezničar season 1084:Keep all, do not delete any 108:(AfD)? Read these primers! 1630: 687:2015–16 FK Sarajevo season 641:2014–15 FK Sarajevo season 595:2013–14 FK Sarajevo season 411:2012–13 FK Sarajevo season 365:2011–12 FK Sarajevo season 319:2010–11 FK Sarajevo season 273:2009–10 FK Sarajevo season 1594:16:56, 27 June 2019 (UTC) 1567:20:51, 25 June 2019 (UTC) 1543:00:28, 26 June 2019 (UTC) 1507:13:45, 25 June 2019 (UTC) 1479:18:34, 23 June 2019 (UTC) 1442:03:59, 21 June 2019 (UTC) 1400:06:54, 20 June 2019 (UTC) 1355:22:52, 18 June 2019 (UTC) 1338:21:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC) 1225:17:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC) 1207:15:51, 15 June 2019 (UTC) 1178:10:36, 14 June 2019 (UTC) 1150:05:58, 14 June 2019 (UTC) 1121:01:48, 14 June 2019 (UTC) 1079:17:23, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 1024:09:08, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 1006:09:07, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 987:07:57, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 958:06:06, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 935:05:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 915:05:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 895:08:48, 29 June 2019 (UTC) 879:05:33, 13 June 2019 (UTC) 1603:Please do not modify it. 1059:, based on that policy. 71:19:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC) 32:Please do not modify it. 1138:Deletion is not cleanup 967:FK Željezničar Sarajevo 1260:10.30925/zpfsr.39.2.12 883:Withdrawn by nominator 82:AfDs for this article: 106:Articles for deletion 1497:"fully-professional" 996:WikiProject Football 1372:Relisting comment: 1132:, may likely pass 263:The article fails 1596: 1402: 1008: 937: 917: 123:Guide to deletion 113:How to contribute 1621: 1583: 1581: 1579: 1439: 1431: 1389: 1369: 1367: 1347:Inter&anthro 1318: 1317: 1315: 1313: 1293: 1284: 1278: 1277: 1275: 1273: 1254:(2): 1039–1067. 1245: 1236: 1220: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1108:FC Bayern Munich 1076: 1068: 993: 954: 866: 848: 820: 802: 774: 756: 728: 710: 682: 664: 636: 618: 590: 572: 544: 526: 498: 480: 452: 434: 406: 388: 360: 342: 314: 296: 258: 257: 243: 195: 183: 165: 103: 34: 1629: 1628: 1624: 1623: 1622: 1620: 1619: 1618: 1617: 1611:deletion review 1597: 1574: 1572: 1463:User:HawkAussie 1435: 1427: 1403: 1383:as the current 1362: 1360: 1322: 1321: 1311: 1309: 1298:(in Croatian). 1291: 1286: 1285: 1281: 1271: 1269: 1250:(in Croatian). 1243: 1238: 1237: 1233: 1216: 1173: 1168: 1163: 1072: 1064: 956: 952: 839: 823: 793: 777: 747: 731: 701: 685: 655: 639: 609: 593: 563: 547: 517: 501: 471: 455: 425: 409: 379: 363: 333: 317: 287: 271: 200: 191: 156: 140: 137: 100: 97: 80: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1627: 1625: 1616: 1615: 1582: 1571: 1570: 1569: 1550: 1549: 1548: 1547: 1546: 1545: 1518: 1517: 1510: 1509: 1482: 1481: 1444: 1388: 1370: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1340: 1330:Bosna Sarajevo 1320: 1319: 1279: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1209: 1180: 1152: 1123: 1081: 1026: 1010: 1009: 990: 989: 960: 946: 939: 938: 918: 881: 868: 867: 821: 775: 729: 683: 637: 591: 545: 499: 453: 407: 361: 315: 261: 260: 197: 136: 135: 130: 120: 115: 98: 96: 95: 94: 89: 81: 79: 74: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1626: 1614: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1599: 1598: 1595: 1591: 1587: 1580: 1577: 1568: 1564: 1560: 1555: 1552: 1551: 1544: 1540: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1519: 1514: 1513: 1512: 1511: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1498: 1494: 1490: 1486: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1480: 1476: 1472: 1468: 1464: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1445: 1443: 1440: 1438: 1432: 1430: 1425: 1424:SportingFlyer 1421: 1417: 1413: 1408: 1405: 1404: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1386: 1382: 1378: 1373: 1368: 1365: 1356: 1352: 1348: 1344: 1341: 1339: 1335: 1331: 1327: 1324: 1323: 1308: 1305: 1301: 1297: 1290: 1283: 1280: 1268: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1242: 1235: 1232: 1226: 1223: 1221: 1219: 1213: 1210: 1208: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1192: 1188: 1184: 1181: 1179: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1160: 1156: 1153: 1151: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1124: 1122: 1118: 1114: 1109: 1105: 1101: 1097: 1096:SportingFlyer 1093: 1089: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1069: 1067: 1062: 1061:SportingFlyer 1058: 1054: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1029:Weak keep all 1027: 1025: 1022: 1019: 1015: 1012: 1011: 1007: 1004: 1001: 997: 992: 991: 988: 984: 980: 976: 972: 968: 964: 961: 959: 955: 949: 944: 941: 940: 936: 932: 928: 924: 919: 916: 912: 908: 904: 899: 898: 897: 896: 892: 888: 884: 880: 876: 872: 864: 860: 856: 852: 847: 843: 838: 834: 830: 826: 822: 818: 814: 810: 806: 801: 797: 792: 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 768: 764: 760: 755: 751: 746: 742: 738: 734: 730: 726: 722: 718: 714: 709: 705: 700: 696: 692: 688: 684: 680: 676: 672: 668: 663: 659: 654: 650: 646: 642: 638: 634: 630: 626: 622: 617: 613: 608: 604: 600: 596: 592: 588: 584: 580: 576: 571: 567: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 542: 538: 534: 530: 525: 521: 516: 512: 508: 504: 500: 496: 492: 488: 484: 479: 475: 470: 466: 462: 458: 454: 450: 446: 442: 438: 433: 429: 424: 420: 416: 412: 408: 404: 400: 396: 392: 387: 383: 378: 374: 370: 366: 362: 358: 354: 350: 346: 341: 337: 332: 328: 324: 320: 316: 312: 308: 304: 300: 295: 291: 286: 282: 278: 274: 270: 269: 268: 266: 256: 252: 249: 246: 242: 238: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 210: 206: 203: 202:Find sources: 198: 194: 190: 187: 181: 177: 173: 169: 164: 160: 155: 151: 147: 143: 139: 138: 134: 131: 128: 124: 121: 119: 116: 114: 111: 110: 109: 107: 102: 93: 90: 88: 85: 78: 75: 73: 72: 68: 64: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 1602: 1600: 1573: 1553: 1466: 1454: 1446: 1434: 1426: 1406: 1371: 1361: 1342: 1325: 1310:. Retrieved 1302:(1): 67–95. 1299: 1295: 1282: 1270:. Retrieved 1251: 1247: 1234: 1217: 1211: 1189:. While the 1182: 1154: 1125: 1104:Arsenal F.C. 1100:FC Barcelona 1083: 1071: 1063: 1028: 1013: 979:Lowercaserho 962: 942: 882: 869: 262: 250: 244: 236: 229: 223: 217: 211: 201: 188: 99: 59: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 1523:WP:NSEASONS 1489:WP:NSEASONS 1451:WP:NSEASONS 1292:(html, pdf) 1244:(html, pdf) 1191:WP:NSEASONS 1159:WP:NSEASONS 1113:KingSkyLord 1057:WP:NOTSTATS 1045:WP:NOTSTATS 975:WP:NOTSTATS 971:WP:NSEASONS 227:free images 1586:Randykitty 1527:been added 1392:Fenix down 1155:Delete all 1092:WP:NOSTATS 1037:WP:SEASONS 1014:Delete all 953:reply here 927:HawkAussie 907:HawkAussie 887:HawkAussie 871:HawkAussie 63:Fenix down 1607:talk page 1307:0590-9597 1267:1330-349X 1218:౪ Santa ౪ 1161:failure. 37:talk page 1609:or in a 1576:Relisted 1559:BiHVolim 1554:Keep all 1385:NOTSTATS 1381:NSEASONS 1364:Relisted 1343:Keep all 1326:Keep all 1212:Keep all 963:Redirect 186:View log 127:glossary 54:NSEASONS 39:or in a 1504:Snowman 1447:Comment 1407:Comment 1312:15 June 1272:15 June 1126:Comment 1021:Snowman 1003:Snowman 842:protect 837:history 796:protect 791:history 750:protect 745:history 704:protect 699:history 658:protect 653:history 612:protect 607:history 566:protect 561:history 520:protect 515:history 474:protect 469:history 428:protect 423:history 382:protect 377:history 336:protect 331:history 290:protect 285:history 233:WP refs 221:scholar 159:protect 154:history 104:New to 1420:WP:GNG 1416:WP:GNG 1412:WP:HEY 1195:WP:GNG 1164:Number 1142:Kosack 1134:WP:GNG 1106:, and 1088:WP:GNG 1049:WP:GNG 1041:WP:GNG 1033:WP:GNG 943:Delete 846:delete 800:delete 754:delete 708:delete 662:delete 616:delete 570:delete 524:delete 478:delete 432:delete 386:delete 340:delete 294:delete 265:WP:GNG 205:Google 163:delete 1535:Nfitz 1501:Giant 1471:Nfitz 1465:that 1199:Nfitz 1018:Giant 1000:Giant 863:views 855:watch 851:links 817:views 809:watch 805:links 771:views 763:watch 759:links 725:views 717:watch 713:links 679:views 671:watch 667:links 633:views 625:watch 621:links 587:views 579:watch 575:links 541:views 533:watch 529:links 495:views 487:watch 483:links 449:views 441:watch 437:links 403:views 395:watch 391:links 357:views 349:watch 345:links 311:views 303:watch 299:links 248:JSTOR 209:books 193:Stats 180:views 172:watch 168:links 16:< 1590:talk 1563:talk 1539:talk 1475:talk 1396:talk 1351:talk 1334:talk 1314:2019 1304:ISSN 1274:2019 1264:ISSN 1203:talk 1187:this 1183:Keep 1157:per 1146:talk 1117:talk 983:talk 973:and 969:per 931:talk 911:talk 891:talk 875:talk 859:logs 833:talk 829:edit 813:logs 787:talk 783:edit 767:logs 741:talk 737:edit 721:logs 695:talk 691:edit 675:logs 649:talk 645:edit 629:logs 603:talk 599:edit 583:logs 557:talk 553:edit 537:logs 511:talk 507:edit 491:logs 465:talk 461:edit 445:logs 419:talk 415:edit 399:logs 373:talk 369:edit 353:logs 327:talk 323:edit 307:logs 281:talk 277:edit 241:FENS 215:news 176:logs 150:talk 146:edit 67:talk 1529:to 1377:GNG 1256:doi 965:to 255:TWL 184:– ( 1592:) 1565:) 1541:) 1499:. 1495:) 1477:) 1398:) 1353:) 1336:) 1300:48 1294:. 1262:. 1252:39 1246:. 1205:) 1148:) 1140:. 1119:) 1102:, 985:) 933:) 925:. 913:) 905:. 893:) 877:) 861:| 857:| 853:| 849:| 844:| 840:| 835:| 831:| 815:| 811:| 807:| 803:| 798:| 794:| 789:| 785:| 769:| 765:| 761:| 757:| 752:| 748:| 743:| 739:| 723:| 719:| 715:| 711:| 706:| 702:| 697:| 693:| 677:| 673:| 669:| 665:| 660:| 656:| 651:| 647:| 631:| 627:| 623:| 619:| 614:| 610:| 605:| 601:| 585:| 581:| 577:| 573:| 568:| 564:| 559:| 555:| 539:| 535:| 531:| 527:| 522:| 518:| 513:| 509:| 493:| 489:| 485:| 481:| 476:| 472:| 467:| 463:| 447:| 443:| 439:| 435:| 430:| 426:| 421:| 417:| 401:| 397:| 393:| 389:| 384:| 380:| 375:| 371:| 355:| 351:| 347:| 343:| 338:| 334:| 329:| 325:| 309:| 305:| 301:| 297:| 292:| 288:| 283:| 279:| 235:) 178:| 174:| 170:| 166:| 161:| 157:| 152:| 148:| 69:) 1588:( 1561:( 1537:( 1473:( 1437:C 1433:· 1429:T 1394:( 1349:( 1332:( 1316:. 1276:. 1258:: 1201:( 1174:7 1169:5 1144:( 1115:( 1074:C 1070:· 1066:T 981:( 950:| 929:( 909:( 889:( 873:( 865:) 827:( 819:) 781:( 773:) 735:( 727:) 689:( 681:) 643:( 635:) 597:( 589:) 551:( 543:) 505:( 497:) 459:( 451:) 413:( 405:) 367:( 359:) 321:( 313:) 275:( 259:) 251:· 245:· 237:· 230:· 224:· 218:· 212:· 207:( 199:( 196:) 189:· 182:) 144:( 129:) 125:( 65:(

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
NSEASONS
Fenix down
talk
19:56, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
2011–12 FK Željezničar season
Articles for deletion/2011–12 FK Sarajevo season
Articles for deletion/2011–12 FK Željezničar season

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
2011–12 FK Željezničar season
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.