320:, then this election surely is not up to par. In the case of Frederick, I'd recommend that (unless elections are, for some reason, of particular note), mayoral elections be relegated at most to a table on the article for the city showing the general election results of recent mayoral races.
315:
No specific standard yet. But in this case, this article does not state that anything particularly noteworthy took place in this election, the city itself is not large or significant enough that it would seem all of its elections would be automatically noteworthy (as a city like
Baltimore,
342:. I'd agree that we should only maintain separate elections articles for major cities (measured by population), or for special circumstances where the election earned news coverage beyond the local area. Chula Vista population about 271K. Frederick population about 72K. --
195:
317:
189:
287:
316:
Philadelphia, Boston, or
Chicago's elections can be), and neither of the two candidates appear noteworthy enough themselves to have biographical articles published about them. If
156:
129:
124:
133:
116:
263:
243:
318:
Chula Vista (a city many times larger) did not have its election articles, with far more detailed analysis, be considered notable enough for independent articles
103:
88:
210:
177:
391:
374:
351:
329:
299:
275:
255:
235:
58:
171:
83:
76:
17:
167:
120:
217:
97:
93:
112:
64:
408:
40:
183:
325:
231:
404:
36:
271:
251:
203:
337:
321:
227:
365:
Frederick is a pretty small city, and this is a routine election, with no claim to notability.
387:
347:
295:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
403:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
370:
267:
247:
383:
343:
310:
291:
150:
366:
290:
already in the encyclopedia. Is there an objective standard for notability? --
54:
399:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
146:
142:
138:
202:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
411:). No further edits should be made to this page.
262:Note: This discussion has been included in the
242:Note: This discussion has been included in the
264:list of Maryland-related deletion discussions
244:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
216:
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
261:
241:
7:
24:
288:plenty of U.S. mayoral elections
89:Introduction to deletion process
113:2017 Frederick mayoral election
65:2017 Frederick mayoral election
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
392:01:44, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
375:22:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
352:21:05, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
330:20:37, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
300:17:48, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
276:01:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
256:01:01, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
236:00:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
59:15:13, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
428:
286:. It looks like we have
401:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
226:Non-notable election
77:Articles for deletion
278:
258:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
419:
341:
314:
221:
220:
206:
154:
136:
74:
34:
427:
426:
422:
421:
420:
418:
417:
416:
415:
409:deletion review
335:
308:
163:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
425:
423:
414:
413:
395:
394:
382:per above. --
377:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
354:
303:
302:
280:
279:
259:
224:
223:
160:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
424:
412:
410:
406:
402:
397:
396:
393:
389:
385:
381:
378:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
353:
349:
345:
339:
338:SecretName101
333:
332:
331:
327:
323:
322:SecretName101
319:
312:
307:
306:
305:
304:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
282:
281:
277:
273:
269:
265:
260:
257:
253:
249:
245:
240:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
228:SecretName101
219:
215:
212:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
169:
166:
165:Find sources:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
400:
398:
379:
362:
334:thanks much
283:
225:
213:
207:
199:
192:
186:
180:
174:
164:
70:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
190:free images
268:Lightburst
248:Lightburst
405:talk page
37:talk page
407:or in a
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
384:Lockley
344:Lockley
311:Lockley
292:Lockley
284:Comment
196:WP refs
184:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
380:Delete
367:Mangoe
363:delete
168:Google
134:delete
50:delete
211:JSTOR
172:books
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
388:talk
371:talk
348:talk
326:talk
296:talk
272:talk
252:talk
232:talk
204:FENS
178:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
55:Tone
218:TWL
155:– (
390:)
373:)
350:)
328:)
298:)
274:)
266:.
254:)
246:.
234:)
198:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
52:.
386:(
369:(
346:(
340::
336:@
324:(
313::
309:@
294:(
270:(
250:(
230:(
222:)
214:·
208:·
200:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
175:·
170:(
162:(
159:)
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.