597:: I don't disagree that it passes WP:NFILM. I "assume" there are likely even more sources "out there" and the reason I haven't argued delete. I would point out that with 10 names listed like 22 times on the article (somewhat overkill on a "Stub-class" with triple repeated blue links) someone else will likely read this, and even if it survives this AFD, it may likely be resubmitted. BLP articles, or those related that mentions a living person, according to policies and guidelines, "must" be held to a higher standard. We generally don't just try to take one "rule" and forget the others. and it really doesn't matter if the material is "negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable". Anyone that has the right resources might want to consider that and possibly provide additional sourcing. At any rate: Have a nice day,
429:
636:: My opinion will not count "if" this is just a headcount. The rationale for a !vote is: One reference and a trailer release does not provide evidence of clear notability. We cannot override other policies and guidelines (especially BLP related) with "as a film article rather than a BLP" to squeeze in notability by exception. I could not find anything else substantial on the movie.
360:
Hi. I have huge doubts about reliability about these sources (except telangana today). The reviews seems to be paid reviews. In any case, they are reviews by websites that would cover most of the films released recently. None of the critics who gave review are "nationally known critics", they arent
523:
as a widely released film having full independent reviews by nationally known critics (meaning published in national newspapers) such as The Times of India and
Telangana Today even if the other reviews are disregarded which is not established that they are definitely unreliable, regards
501:
would seem more appropriate. If kept it would be interesting (if possible) to include the reasoning for the delayed production time in the article, so it doesn't seem like a missed prophesy (or missed doomsday) movie, but that is a content issue.
497:(I am not familiar with any but the Times) then there are ample sources. The movie was a flop, with one review giving 2 1/2 stars and the rest either a bad review or 1 star out of five. The movie was a year over the production timeline so
207:
160:
201:
267:
286:
92:
107:
477:
would be at odds with BLP policies and guidelines with only "Critic Review of 2016 The End" (Times Of India). I would think someone would dig out a
167:
469:). "Makers of 2016 The End release trailer of the comedy film" (International Business Times) was from Oct 6, 2016 and is dubious. This is a
611:
The sources I could find were mostly tabloid type, or non-reliable at best (exluding times of India). Thats why i had to take it to AfD. —
309:
653:
There are no BLP concerns with this film article and there are 2 reliable sources independent reviews and state-level press counts for
486:
343:
87:
80:
17:
133:
128:
60:
137:
101:
97:
222:
120:
562:
387:
189:
683:
482:
335:
40:
183:
615:
542:
443:
365:
250:
179:
679:
666:
662:
645:
624:
606:
587:
551:
533:
529:
511:
452:
421:
402:
398:
374:
355:
351:
321:
317:
297:
278:
259:
62:
36:
58:
229:
490:
331:
215:
361:
even known as critics. That was the first criteria. The film fails rest of the criteria as well. —
520:
239:
481:! instead of just posting them on the discussion considering the current poor BLP sourcing. If
475:"The state of references on the article does not matter as long as there are sources out there"
582:
290:
271:
124:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
678:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
658:
641:
602:
525:
507:
417:
347:
313:
654:
478:
470:
243:
428:
339:
195:
53:
436:
573:
116:
68:
154:
637:
598:
503:
413:
538:
Telangana Today is not a national newspaper. Its a state-wide newspaper. —
519:
as a film article rather than a BLP it passes the first criteria of
465:
are two on the article. Three but IMDb was used as a reference (
674:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
565:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
390:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
150:
146:
142:
214:
308:
has a full independent review in The Times of India
571:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
396:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
228:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
686:). No further edits should be made to this page.
285:Note: This discussion has been included in the
266:Note: This discussion has been included in the
657:especially the size of Indian states, regards
8:
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
284:
268:list of India-related deletion discussions
265:
287:list of Film-related deletion discussions
412:- seems to have plenty of sources. -
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
435:there are sources, but they are not
312:, will look for more later, thanks
24:
427:
93:Introduction to deletion process
240:notability guidelines for films
473:related article so the usual;
330:Have found some more reviews:
1:
667:20:31, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
244:general notability guidelines
63:09:51, 5 September 2018 (UTC)
646:14:56, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
625:17:34, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
607:14:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
588:10:34, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
552:08:17, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
534:12:40, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
512:00:47, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
453:23:10, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
422:21:57, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
403:09:23, 21 August 2018 (UTC)
375:13:06, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
356:18:59, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
322:15:47, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
298:08:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
279:08:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
260:06:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
703:
338:which is a newspaper, see
489:(needs translating), and
467:moved to "External links"
676:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
493:(I could not bring up)
81:Articles for deletion
495:are reliable sources
499:2016 The End (2017)
463:"plenty of sources"
238:A movie that fails
483:Telanganatoday.com
590:
487:livehindustan.com
405:
344:livehindustan.com
300:
281:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
694:
623:
622:
620:
585:
581:
579:
576:
570:
568:
566:
550:
549:
547:
451:
450:
448:
431:
401:
395:
393:
391:
373:
372:
370:
295:
276:
258:
257:
255:
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
702:
701:
697:
696:
695:
693:
692:
691:
690:
684:deletion review
616:
613:
612:
591:
583:
577:
574:
572:
561:
559:
543:
540:
539:
444:
441:
440:
406:
397:
386:
384:
366:
363:
362:
340:Telangana Today
336:Telangana Today
291:
272:
251:
248:
247:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
700:
698:
689:
688:
670:
669:
648:
630:
629:
628:
627:
569:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
514:
425:
424:
394:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
377:
325:
324:
302:
301:
282:
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
699:
687:
685:
681:
677:
672:
671:
668:
664:
660:
656:
652:
649:
647:
643:
639:
635:
632:
631:
626:
621:
619:
614:usernamekiran
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
596:
593:
592:
589:
586:
580:
567:
564:
553:
548:
546:
541:usernamekiran
537:
536:
535:
531:
527:
522:
518:
515:
513:
509:
505:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
468:
464:
460:
457:
456:
455:
454:
449:
447:
442:usernamekiran
438:
434:
430:
423:
419:
415:
411:
408:
407:
404:
400:
399:North America
392:
389:
376:
371:
369:
364:usernamekiran
359:
358:
357:
353:
349:
345:
341:
337:
333:
329:
328:
327:
326:
323:
319:
315:
311:
307:
304:
303:
299:
296:
294:
288:
283:
280:
277:
275:
269:
264:
263:
262:
261:
256:
254:
249:usernamekiran
245:
241:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
675:
673:
650:
633:
617:
594:
560:
544:
516:
498:
494:
474:
466:
462:
458:
445:
432:
426:
409:
385:
367:
305:
293:CAPTAIN RAJU
292:
274:CAPTAIN RAJU
273:
252:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
117:2016 The End
74:
69:2016 The End
54:
50:no consensus
49:
47:
31:
28:
659:Atlantic306
526:Atlantic306
348:Atlantic306
314:Atlantic306
202:free images
55:Ritchie333
680:talk page
491:Dekh News
346:, thanks
332:Dekh News
37:talk page
682:or in a
563:Relisted
521:WP:NFILM
459:Comments
433:Comment:
388:Relisted
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
651:Comment
517:Comment
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
655:WP:GNG
638:Otr500
634:Delete
618:(talk)
599:Otr500
578:umbolo
545:(talk)
504:Otr500
461:: The
446:(talk)
414:Scarpy
368:(talk)
342:, and
253:(talk)
242:, and
180:Google
138:delete
595:Reply
437:WP:RS
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
663:talk
642:talk
603:talk
530:talk
508:talk
418:talk
410:Keep
352:talk
318:talk
310:here
306:Keep
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
584:^^^
479:HEY
471:BLP
439:. —
246:. —
230:TWL
159:– (
665:)
644:)
605:)
532:)
510:)
485:,
420:)
354:)
334:,
320:)
289:.
270:.
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
52:.
661:(
640:(
601:(
575:w
528:(
506:(
416:(
350:(
316:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.