472:). WP:MUSIC does, in fact, have specific language suggesting a route to evaluating the notability of record labels, and we should prefer the input of subject experts in music on the notability of musical topics over business and organization experts, as we do for bands (which, were they not specifically excluded, unquestionably would meet CORP's guidelines, too). CORP neither is (by fiat) nor should be the holding standard, and certainly, Ebullition as a merge target is a noteworthy enough label to pass muster as an important indie label - if we don't have room for an article on that label, we have much bigger standard-of-inclusion problems than can be addressed in this specific discussion.
401:'s sense of an important indie. In any case, it has at least five noteworthy bands that are all tied together by association with this label, and having a redlink here does not serve the user who wants to understand that connection. Upmerging to Ebullition, of which this was a subsidiary, is an option, as is merging into the Ward article, though I agree that it needs some sprucing up.
467:
reason a record label is worth covering in an encyclopedia is its artistic output; citing NOTINHERITED is missing the point. We have no reason to cover a record label that does anything other than release noteworthy (i.e., notable) music and musicians; a label that passed GNG but didn't do that, in
199:
278:
193:
258:
160:
397:. I disagree that NCORP is the correct guideline to apply, as I have argued repeatedly and at length elsewhere, but the label has at least a passing shot at meeting
107:
92:
486:
Ah, and I see that you have already moved to have
Ebullition deleted as well, so I guess I'll move on to fighting that battle over there.
133:
128:
137:
120:
87:
80:
17:
214:
181:
101:
97:
527:
512:
616:
306:
40:
175:
317:
article is also in pretty sorry shape, and only really scrapes by on notability through circular means (passes
230:"record label" would fall under organization/company as it is not a band, and this company lacks sufficiently
599:
572:
551:
532:
495:
481:
457:
410:
375:
358:
329:
290:
270:
250:
171:
62:
302:
612:
594:
522:
321:
as a member of 2 or more notable ensembles, but are those ensembles only notable because he's in them?)
36:
221:
429:
453:
445:
354:
286:
266:
246:
238:
234:
207:
124:
581:
568:
491:
477:
406:
394:
390:
364:
310:
53:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
611:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
589:
560:
547:
433:
318:
187:
57:
469:
437:
398:
346:
342:
449:
441:
350:
282:
262:
242:
116:
68:
585:
564:
487:
473:
425:
402:
231:
369:
323:
436:
does not address recording labels/companies. These indie labels that fail to meet
154:
543:
463:
With all due respect, I couldn't disagree more with any of these comments. The
428:
status. Notability is not built from association with notable people per
424:
I reviewed both redirect targets and they're both of highly questionable
440:
fails to have enough notability to warrant an article on
Knowledge.
607:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
515:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
584:, however it appears that his wikipage maybe borderline
150:
146:
142:
206:
521:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
619:). No further edits should be made to this page.
277:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:Note: This discussion has been included in the
279:list of California-related deletion discussions
259:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
220:
8:
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
468:my opinion, may not need an article (e.g.,
276:
256:
363:Oh, I was referring to the notability of
7:
309:. My only qualm with redirecting to
341:If it's a record label, I believe
24:
93:Introduction to deletion process
349:is the appropriate SNG to use.
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
301:. Found only trivial mentions
1:
448:) 00:42, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
367:under NMUSIC, not the label.
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
636:
600:16:38, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
573:16:27, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
411:14:48, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
376:14:21, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
359:04:25, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
330:03:09, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
291:02:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
271:02:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
251:02:05, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
63:20:00, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
552:23:37, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
533:05:05, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
496:13:57, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
482:13:56, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
458:00:40, 7 April 2021 (UTC)
59:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
609:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
81:Articles for deletion
582:Max Ward (drummer)
559:- doesn't satisfy
395:Max Ward (drummer)
391:Ebullition Records
311:Max Ward (drummer)
299:Delete or Redirect
54:Max Ward (drummer)
535:
293:
273:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
627:
597:
592:
520:
518:
516:
372:
326:
225:
224:
210:
158:
140:
78:
60:
34:
635:
634:
630:
629:
628:
626:
625:
624:
623:
617:deletion review
595:
590:
536:
511:
509:
470:EDGEOUT Records
370:
324:
167:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
633:
631:
622:
621:
603:
602:
575:
554:
519:
508:
507:
506:
505:
504:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
414:
413:
383:
382:
381:
380:
379:
378:
345:, rather than
333:
332:
295:
294:
274:
228:
227:
164:
117:625 Thrashcore
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
69:625 Thrashcore
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
632:
620:
618:
614:
610:
605:
604:
601:
598:
593:
587:
583:
579:
576:
574:
570:
566:
562:
558:
555:
553:
549:
545:
542:per Chubbles
541:
538:
537:
534:
531:
530:
526:
525:
517:
514:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
483:
479:
475:
471:
466:
462:
461:
459:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
435:
431:
430:WP:INHERITORG
427:
423:
420:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
392:
388:
385:
384:
377:
374:
373:
366:
362:
361:
360:
356:
352:
348:
344:
340:
337:
336:
335:
334:
331:
328:
327:
320:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
297:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
272:
268:
264:
260:
255:
254:
253:
252:
248:
244:
240:
236:
235:deep coverage
233:
223:
219:
216:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
180:
177:
173:
170:
169:Find sources:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
608:
606:
577:
556:
539:
528:
523:
510:
464:
421:
386:
368:
338:
322:
314:
298:
239:WP:CORPDEPTH
232:wide breadth
229:
217:
211:
203:
196:
190:
184:
178:
168:
74:
49:
47:
31:
28:
237:to satisfy
194:free images
613:talk page
561:WP:NMUSIC
524:Vaticidal
450:Graywalls
442:Graywalls
434:WP:NMUSIC
351:Graywalls
319:WP:NMUSIC
283:Graywalls
263:Graywalls
243:Graywalls
37:talk page
615:or in a
565:Riteboke
540:comments
513:Relisted
488:Chubbles
474:Chubbles
438:WP:NCORP
403:Chubbles
399:WP:MUSIC
365:Max Ward
347:WP:NBAND
343:WP:NCORP
313:is that
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
529:prophet
422:comment
371:Kncny11
339:comment
325:Kncny11
200:WP refs
188:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
591:Devoke
586:WP:GNG
557:Delete
544:Rajuiu
426:WP:GNG
172:Google
138:delete
596:water
578:Merge
387:Merge
215:JSTOR
176:books
155:views
147:watch
143:links
50:merge
16:<
569:talk
548:talk
492:talk
478:talk
465:only
454:talk
446:talk
407:talk
355:talk
315:that
307:here
305:and
303:here
287:talk
267:talk
247:talk
208:FENS
182:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
580:to
393:or
389:to
222:TWL
159:– (
52:to
588:--
571:)
563:.
550:)
494:)
480:)
460:'
456:)
432:.
409:)
357:)
289:)
281:.
269:)
261:.
249:)
241:.
202:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
56:.
567:(
546:(
490:(
476:(
452:(
444:(
405:(
353:(
285:(
265:(
245:(
226:)
218:·
212:·
204:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
179:·
174:(
166:(
163:)
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.