404:
CCI30 - they don't talk about it as an interesting object in itself - but they treat it as a useful index for their work. Not passing mentions, is what I mean. (I found multiple passing mentions, but didn't list those.) Only two papers so far, I'll look a bit further later. Borderline at present,
466:
sort of way. The proposed alternative of creating a list of such indices, which would presumably have to include ones that are more dubious and poorly sourced than this one, just to house the information in this article seems like a lot of work, and I'm not clear on what the benefit would be -
336:, just - yeah, I'm as surprised I'm saying "keep" as you are. But, while having no mainstream coverage, it seems to have a bit of peer-reviewed academic coverage. I've added cites to the article for substantive papers about, dealing with or using the CCI30. There's also this
546:. Given the way crypto articles are used and abused and the lack of actual independent notability - despite being cited in the two mentioned papers - suggests it should not be an independent article. However, merge/redirect to Rivin as its creator seems like a reasonable
461:
I've struck my delete vote above, since it appears that someone cleverer than me has indeed come along :). The sourcing isn't exactly cast-iron CORPDEPTH stuff, but it does show that it has academic credibility and so is probably notable in an
213:
314:. I not too familiar with sources for cryptocurrency stuff though, so I just tagged it - agree that is should be deleted, unless someone cleverer than me can come up with some cast-iron sources.
422:- Thanks for finding those! I do think that they may show that they deserve some coverage. However, one of the papers also looks at some other indexes, so maybe the solution is to move it to
310:
I considered nominating this myself - the article is entirely unsourced (just an EL to the subject's website), and I couldn't find any sources online that I thought would satisfy
285:
166:
265:
337:
207:
98:
619:
article where there was already a lead-in for it. Not everything needs its own article; Knowledge (XXG) has a bang-up search engine to find articles which
113:
173:
400:
Check your
Knowledge (XXG) email :-) The papers are paywalled, but they're available if you look in some obvious places. They're not
93:
86:
17:
360:, I don't have access to those. Are they about the index or usage of the index or do they only use/mention the index? Does it meet
107:
103:
649:
40:
228:
195:
139:
134:
143:
593:
576:
528:
480:
449:
431:
423:
410:
369:
344:
323:
293:
273:
253:
126:
467:
probably better just to keep a stub about this one, with the current sourcing plus anything further that
311:
645:
36:
189:
555:
221:
361:
245:
185:
510:
385:
632:
597:
581:
559:
532:
518:
485:
453:
435:
414:
393:
373:
348:
328:
297:
277:
257:
68:
628:
589:
568:
524:
472:
468:
445:
440:
I'm not sure what others rate discussion ... the
Coinbase one? That's covered all it needs in
427:
419:
406:
365:
357:
340:
315:
289:
269:
249:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
644:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
235:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
514:
389:
547:
463:
244:
No indication of significance and little to no reliable, independent coverage, let along
551:
339:
that I don't have access to, but is apparently a peer-reviewed conference proceeding -
59:
623:
things (like CCi30). No need to have the 'thing' in a title in order to find it. --
624:
201:
160:
616:
543:
506:
130:
53:
426:
and expand with discussion of other indexes. How would that sound to you?
441:
381:
612:
122:
74:
640:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
615:
article, so I just went ahead and put the info into the
156:
152:
148:
220:
234:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
652:). No further edits should be made to this page.
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
264:Note: This discussion has been included in the
286:list of Internet-related deletion discussions
8:
523:That's actually a highly plausible option -
266:list of Finance-related deletion discussions
114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
567:to Ivor Rivin works for me too, good call.
283:
263:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
588:I also would support this merge.
99:Introduction to deletion process
611:: There was very little in the
1:
89:(AfD)? Read these primers!
669:
642:Please do not modify it.
633:05:22, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
598:18:21, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
582:17:25, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
560:03:58, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
533:22:19, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
519:18:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
486:12:08, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
454:21:52, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
436:21:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
415:18:58, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
394:18:03, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
374:17:15, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
349:17:13, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
329:15:01, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
298:13:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
278:13:09, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
258:12:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
69:18:09, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
32:Please do not modify it.
87:Articles for deletion
424:Cryptocurrency index
471:is able to dig up.
509:, the co-creator.
300:
280:
104:Guide to deletion
94:How to contribute
67:
660:
574:
571:
478:
475:
321:
318:
239:
238:
224:
176:
164:
146:
84:
66:
64:
57:
34:
668:
667:
663:
662:
661:
659:
658:
657:
656:
650:deletion review
579:
572:
569:
483:
476:
473:
326:
319:
316:
181:
172:
137:
121:
118:
81:
78:
60:
58:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
666:
664:
655:
654:
636:
635:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
577:
537:
536:
535:
499:
498:
497:
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
481:
398:
397:
396:
352:
351:
331:
324:
302:
301:
281:
242:
241:
178:
117:
116:
111:
101:
96:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
665:
653:
651:
647:
643:
638:
637:
634:
630:
626:
622:
618:
614:
610:
607:
599:
595:
591:
587:
586:
585:
584:
583:
580:
575:
566:
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
545:
541:
538:
534:
530:
526:
522:
521:
520:
516:
512:
508:
504:
501:
500:
487:
484:
479:
470:
465:
460:
457:
456:
455:
451:
447:
443:
439:
438:
437:
433:
429:
425:
421:
418:
417:
416:
412:
408:
403:
399:
395:
391:
387:
383:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
371:
367:
363:
359:
356:
355:
354:
353:
350:
346:
342:
338:
335:
332:
330:
327:
322:
313:
309:
308:
304:
303:
299:
295:
291:
287:
282:
279:
275:
271:
267:
262:
261:
260:
259:
255:
251:
247:
237:
233:
230:
227:
223:
219:
215:
212:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
187:
184:
183:Find sources:
179:
175:
171:
168:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
115:
112:
109:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
88:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
65:
63:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
641:
639:
620:
609:Delete/Merge
608:
590:StudiesWorld
564:
539:
525:David Gerard
502:
469:David Gerard
458:
446:David Gerard
428:StudiesWorld
420:David Gerard
407:David Gerard
405:let's say -
401:
366:StudiesWorld
358:David Gerard
341:David Gerard
333:
312:WP:CORPDEPTH
306:
305:
290:StudiesWorld
270:StudiesWorld
250:StudiesWorld
243:
231:
225:
217:
210:
204:
198:
192:
182:
169:
80:
61:
49:
47:
31:
28:
208:free images
617:Igor Rivin
544:Igor Rivin
507:Igor Rivin
62:Sandstein
54:Igor Rivin
646:talk page
578:(blether)
552:Barkeep49
482:(blether)
459:Weak keep
362:WP:SIGCOV
334:Weak keep
325:(blether)
246:WP:SIGCOV
37:talk page
648:or in a
550:. Best,
503:Redirect
442:Coinbase
167:View log
108:glossary
39:or in a
625:Nomopbs
621:mention
382:Sci-Hub
214:WP refs
202:scholar
140:protect
135:history
85:New to
573:Summit
548:WP:ATD
511:Blumpf
477:Summit
464:WP:IAR
386:Blumpf
320:Summit
307:Delete
186:Google
144:delete
613:CCI30
570:Girth
565:Merge
540:Merge
474:Girth
402:about
317:Girth
229:JSTOR
190:books
174:Stats
161:views
153:watch
149:links
123:CCI30
75:CCI30
50:merge
16:<
629:talk
594:talk
556:talk
529:talk
515:talk
450:talk
432:talk
411:talk
390:talk
380:Try
370:talk
345:talk
294:talk
274:talk
254:talk
222:FENS
196:news
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
542:to
505:to
236:TWL
165:– (
52:to
631:)
596:)
558:)
531:)
517:)
452:)
444:-
434:)
413:)
392:)
384:.
372:)
364:?
347:)
296:)
288:.
276:)
268:.
256:)
248:.
216:)
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
56:.
627:(
592:(
554:(
527:(
513:(
448:(
430:(
409:(
388:(
368:(
343:(
292:(
272:(
252:(
240:)
232:·
226:·
218:·
211:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
188:(
180:(
177:)
170:·
163:)
125:(
110:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.