813:
variations, these countries have large and predominantly young population, a high level of domestic consumption and economies that are greatly based on products, while their financial systems are highly developed and modern. CIVETS countries generally do not record high inflation rates. Further, fiscal deficits have increased as a result of global economic crisis, but public debt in the CIVETS counties is still fairly low, and all the countries in this group appeared to be relatively immune to recent global recession, which is, generally speaking, only the proof of quality and properly created policy in the previous period. Even political risks in these countries are not high any more, therefore, although a certain risk is still present, all these countries have good prospects to remain stable. However, it is important to mention that CIVETS countries have not shown any interest in coordination of their foreign policies related to investment issues
777:- notability is not temporary. Finally, the origin of a topic is immaterial to a consideration of notability - it might affect where we write about the topic (simplistically, does Windows get covered by itself or as part of Microsoft?), but we need only consider whether or not there is SIGCOV in reliable sources to determine notability. No evidence has been provided that *all* the sources listed above are predatory publications. I find the following three reliable sources spanning a seven year period more than adequate to satisfy the GNG.
832:
pressure to overcome the financial crisis of the 1980s by accepting and implementing IMF recommendations. Furthermore, during the 1990s and the early 21st century, most CIVETS' policy-makers were either trained in the US or adopted the ideas of the
Washington Consensus through their foreign affairs advisory bodies. In that context, it is clear that the phenomenon of policy convergence is easier to understand when the ideas and background of the main leaders are included as one of the variables of analysis.
564:
The concept was not coined by the
Economist Intelligence Unit. It was coined by then-director of the Economist Intelligence Unit, Robert Ward. Neither Ward nor the Economist Intelligence Unit are academics. Ward is a consultant and The Economist Intelligence Unit is a company that provides consulting
862:
CIVETS as a group playing a more and more important role in the world economy, is even considered as "the next BRICs". However, no comparative analysis of knowledge-based economy performance and scientific research performance between the two country groups has been conducted from the perspective of
812:
CIVETS are a group of such countries with fast growing economies. Economists often call this group 'tiger economies'. There is no geographical explanation for the formation of this group, which additionally includes structurally diverse economies. However, despite geographical dispersion and obvious
579:
The "academic sources" cited in this AfD discussion are absolute bottom of the barrel. These are completely unknown journals that churn out rubbish. The fact the term is used in these fringe sources should be taken as a marker of non-notability, if anything. The first source is literally a predatory
831:
Despite the fact that most CIVETS countries acceded to the WTO in 1994 (effective as of 1995) with a strategic view to adjusting to neoliberal ideas and so to participate in the global trade and investment environment, the decision to embrace the neoliberal logic was proximately responding to the
545:
Sadly, we don't have 100 to ask, and that is not a usual requirement for notability. The concept was originated by the EUI, which is extremely difficult to cast as some negligible source. I also don't see how the journals cited above are suddenly non-academic, nor how the sources that are already
713:
publish good quality material, it should just be one of many factors in determining source reliability. I don't have enough knowledge on this topic to comment either way regarding the nomination, but I would suggest other editors to consider the relevance of
530:
This is false. There is ZERO academic discussion of CIVETS in the article. On the point of academic scholarship, I'd go so far as to say that if you ask 100 development economists if they could describe the concept, not a single one would be able to.
565:
services. Part of that includes bandying about catchy academic-sounding labels that have no meaning, coherence and buy-in, but which convey scientism and rigor to the uninformed. Why is
Knowledge (XXG) helping consultants advertise their services?
708:
applies as it is not a frequently used current term (meaning it may be harder to verify) and some of the in-article sources are of questionable reliability. I would not outright dismiss the MDPI source
Thenightaway mentioned as MDPI
236:
term. However, the term CIVETS has not had sustained reliable coverage. In other words, it was a concept that was floated, received some minor coverage at one point in time, and has not had any coverage since. It is not notable.
379:
A. Castillo
Perdomoa, E. E. Tejada Manriqueb, L. E. García Núñezc, A. Quispe Mamanid, & J. Calizaya-Lópeze, "Clustering of universities from CIVETS countries in the Top 20 of the Web of Universities Ranking",
201:
773:(in particular the individual country sections), however, there's a difference between an article containing SYNTH material which can be removed as against a topic which is SYNTHESIS. Furthermore,
652:
794:
Petrović-Ranđelović, Marija; Mitić, Petar; Zdravković, Aleksandar; Cvetanović, Dušan; Cvetanović, Slobodan (2 April 2020). "Economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from CIVETS countries".
678:
Relisting. There is such divided opinion on this article that it is not a Snow Keep. I would welcome some more editors who are AFD regulars to assess this article and newly found sources.
648:
158:
266:
270:
258:
282:
274:
328:
M. Petrović-Ranđelović, P. Mitić, A. Zdravković, D. Cvetanović, & S. Cvetanović, "FDI and
Institutions in BRIC and CIVETS Countries: An Empirical Investigation",
278:
262:
195:
90:
105:
254:
362:
S. Bentes, "Is gold a safe haven for the CIVETS countries under extremely adverse market conditions? Some new evidence from the MF-DCCA analysis",
232:
The article is one of many articles for acronym-groupings of countries that happened in the 2010–2012 period as a result of the popularity of the
424:: The purpose of the study is to examine the effects of the corporate tax rate on sustainable development in the BRIC and CIVETS countries. ..."
85:
78:
17:
844:
Yi, Yong; Qi, Wei; Wu, Dandan (February 2013). "Are CIVETS the next BRICs? A comparative analysis from scientometrics perspective".
303:
99:
95:
667:
633:
508:-- The article is well-sourced with academic discussion today, and it was before as well. This nom falls squarely under
902:
40:
741:
162:
216:
183:
131:
126:
729:
135:
547:
118:
588:. I can't even bother to check the other ones, as these are just random sources that the other user found.
397:
M. M. Rahman, "The effect of taxation on sustainable development goals: evidence from emerging countries."
593:
570:
536:
489:
453:
242:
898:
298:
177:
36:
345:
P. Kechagia & T. Metaxas, "Economic growth and carbon emissions: evidence from CIVETS countries",
882:
757:
719:
357:
827:"A comparative study of foreign economic policies: the CIVETS countries (Working Paper No. 3/2015)"
209:
173:
54:
886:
774:
770:
761:
733:
692:
656:
622:
597:
574:
559:
540:
521:
509:
493:
479:
468:
457:
443:
308:
246:
60:
392:
618:
589:
566:
555:
532:
517:
485:
449:
238:
223:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
897:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
705:
503:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
874:
853:
803:
475:
439:
287:
715:
878:
753:
877:
article; yes, the article needs cleanup, but that's not the point of AfD. Regards,--
189:
748:
are most definitely *not* predatory journals; there is no basis for the claim that
614:
551:
513:
807:
152:
471:
435:
122:
857:
374:
745:
585:
340:
683:
467:
if the term was notable at one time, the article should be retained per
409:
319:. Not getting tons of media coverage these days, but hasn't gone away:
114:
66:
826:
546:
cited are somehow invalid. This is feeling more and more like an
581:
233:
893:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
750:"These are completely unknown journals that churn out rubbish."
670:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
636:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
393:
https://journalppw.com/index.php/jppw/article/view/7181/5048
148:
144:
140:
208:
364:
Physica A: Statistical
Mechanics and its Applications
873:This article could simply follow the format of the
681:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
647:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
222:
769:There is clearly sections of the article that are
829:. Global South Unit, London School of Economics.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
905:). No further edits should be made to this page.
253:Note: This discussion has been included in the
825:Guerra-Barón, Angélica; Mendez, Alvaro (2015).
448:These are not esteemed academic publications.
382:Journal of Positive Psychology & Wellbeing
550:argument. My SNOW Keep !vote stands. Cheers,
8:
106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
375:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2023.128898
252:
586:https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040077
341:https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10040077
786:
749:
410:https://10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10512
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
257:lists for the following topics:
91:Introduction to deletion process
1:
887:09:59, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
808:10.1080/00036846.2019.1679343
762:06:25, 26 December 2023 (UTC)
734:09:42, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
693:04:46, 21 December 2023 (UTC)
657:03:50, 14 December 2023 (UTC)
623:07:55, 12 December 2023 (UTC)
358:10.1080/00036846.2019.1679343
61:20:37, 28 December 2023 (UTC)
644:To discuss more the source's
598:18:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
575:18:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
560:17:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
541:16:32, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
522:16:16, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
494:11:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
480:07:42, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
458:11:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
444:06:44, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
309:05:54, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
247:03:25, 7 December 2023 (UTC)
613:I agree with the nominator
81:(AfD)? Read these primers!
922:
858:10.1007/s11192-012-0791-9
895:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
484:It was never notable.
356:(16), 1806-1815, DOI:
163:edits since nomination
79:Articles for deletion
718:for the nomination.
676:Relisting comment:
642:Relisting comment:
802:(16): 1806–1815.
796:Applied Economics
742:Applied Economics
695:
659:
347:Applied Economics
311:
96:Guide to deletion
86:How to contribute
913:
875:PIGS (economics)
866:
865:
841:
835:
834:
822:
816:
815:
791:
726:
724:
704:I disagree that
691:
680:
673:
671:
646:
639:
637:
306:
301:
294:
290:
255:deletion sorting
227:
226:
212:
156:
138:
76:
59:
34:
921:
920:
916:
915:
914:
912:
911:
910:
909:
903:deletion review
871:
870:
869:
863:scientometrics.
843:
842:
838:
824:
823:
819:
793:
792:
788:
722:
720:
682:
666:
664:
632:
630:
304:
299:
292:
288:
169:
129:
113:
110:
73:
70:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
919:
917:
908:
907:
868:
867:
852:(2): 615–628.
846:Scientometrics
836:
817:
785:
784:
780:
779:
778:
764:
736:
698:
697:
679:
674:
661:
645:
640:
626:
625:
607:
606:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
600:
577:
548:WP:IDONTLIKEIT
525:
524:
499:
498:
497:
496:
462:
461:
460:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
413:
412:
395:
391:(2), 849-858,
377:
360:
343:
321:
320:
313:
312:
230:
229:
166:
109:
108:
103:
93:
88:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
918:
906:
904:
900:
896:
891:
890:
889:
888:
884:
880:
876:
864:
859:
855:
851:
847:
840:
837:
833:
828:
821:
818:
814:
809:
805:
801:
797:
790:
787:
783:
776:
772:
768:
765:
763:
759:
755:
751:
747:
743:
740:
737:
735:
731:
727:
717:
712:
707:
703:
700:
699:
696:
694:
690:
688:
687:
677:
672:
669:
662:
660:
658:
654:
650:
643:
638:
635:
628:
627:
624:
620:
616:
612:
609:
608:
599:
595:
591:
587:
583:
578:
576:
572:
568:
563:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
544:
543:
542:
538:
534:
529:
528:
527:
526:
523:
519:
515:
511:
507:
505:
501:
500:
495:
491:
487:
483:
482:
481:
477:
473:
470:
466:
463:
459:
455:
451:
447:
446:
445:
441:
437:
434:
423:
419:
418:
417:
416:
415:
414:
411:
407:
404:
400:
396:
394:
390:
386:
383:
378:
376:
372:
368:
365:
361:
359:
355:
351:
348:
344:
342:
338:
334:
331:
327:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
318:
315:
314:
310:
307:
302:
297:
296:
295:
284:
280:
276:
272:
268:
264:
260:
256:
251:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
235:
225:
221:
218:
215:
211:
207:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
175:
172:
171:Find sources:
167:
164:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
80:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
58:
57:
56:The Wordsmith
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
894:
892:
872:
861:
849:
845:
839:
830:
820:
811:
799:
795:
789:
781:
766:
738:
710:
701:
685:
684:
675:
665:
663:
641:
631:
629:
610:
590:Thenightaway
567:Thenightaway
533:Thenightaway
502:
486:Thenightaway
464:
450:Thenightaway
421:
405:
402:
398:
388:
384:
381:
370:
366:
363:
353:
349:
346:
336:
332:
329:
316:
291:
286:
267:South Africa
239:Thenightaway
231:
219:
213:
205:
198:
192:
186:
180:
170:
72:
55:
49:
47:
31:
28:
752:Regards, --
580:publisher (
196:free images
879:Goldsztajn
782:References
754:Goldsztajn
649:बिनोद थारू
512:. Cheers,
373:, 128898,
899:talk page
746:Physica A
339:(4), 77;
330:Economies
293:Quidditch
271:Indonesia
259:Economics
37:talk page
901:or in a
775:WP:NTEMP
771:WP:SYNTH
668:Relisted
634:Relisted
510:WP:NTEMP
469:WP:NTEMP
422:Abstract
283:Colombia
159:View log
100:glossary
39:or in a
739:Comment
706:WP:SNOW
702:Comment
615:Chidgk1
552:Last1in
514:Last1in
504:WP:SNOW
465:Comment
399:Heliyon
281:, and
275:Vietnam
202:WP refs
190:scholar
132:protect
127:history
77:New to
723:isvery
716:WP:NEO
611:Delete
472:Park3r
436:Jahaza
279:Turkey
174:Google
136:delete
115:CIVETS
67:CIVETS
721:Darcy
408:(9),
263:Egypt
217:JSTOR
178:books
153:views
145:watch
141:links
16:<
883:talk
767:Keep
758:talk
744:and
730:talk
725:cute
653:talk
619:talk
594:talk
582:MDPI
571:talk
556:talk
537:talk
518:talk
506:Keep
490:talk
476:talk
454:talk
440:talk
403:2022
385:2022
367:2023
350:2019
333:2022
317:Keep
243:talk
234:BRIC
210:FENS
184:news
149:logs
123:talk
119:edit
50:keep
854:doi
804:doi
711:can
584:):
371:623
224:TWL
157:– (
52:.
885:)
860:.
850:94
848:.
810:.
800:52
798:.
760:)
732:)
689:iz
655:)
621:)
596:)
573:)
558:)
539:)
520:)
492:)
478:)
456:)
442:)
401:,
387:,
369:,
354:52
352:,
337:10
335:,
289:WC
285:.
277:,
273:,
269:,
265:,
261:,
245:)
204:)
161:|
151:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
881:(
856::
806::
756:(
728:(
686:L
651:(
617:(
592:(
569:(
554:(
535:(
516:(
488:(
474:(
452:(
438:(
420:"
406:8
389:6
305:✎
300:☎
241:(
228:)
220:·
214:·
206:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
181:·
176:(
168:(
165:)
155:)
117:(
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.