460:), but nothing changes and everything seems pointless, it seems everyone lost interest, I mean just read the comments... Maybe Dispute Resolution could halp, but I do not know who has the nerves to do it. Simply deleting this article certainly won't help it. I thnik we need a section or an article titled "Dispute over the identity of PFC CSKA Sofia" and the rivalry should be included there.
515:(Honestly, the dispute over a club's lineage, especially in association football where the concept of "phoenix clubs" are well known enough to have a Knowledge article, doesn't merit any more.) If the aforementioned club fanboys try to delete such information, then it'll wind up a matter for ANI.
389:
There's no silencing here. If you are able to provide reliable secondary sources that establish that this is a notable and significant rivalry, then, of course, it can be kept. At the moment, it just seems like a case of someone using a crystal ball to predict that this will be a notable rivalry,
241:; the teams have literally only played each other once and it seems a bit of a stretch to call it an established rivalry. I can see the logic behind their prediction that this will be a rivalry in the years to come but I would imagine that, at best, this has to be a case of
198:
370:
Deleting this article is just an atempt of silencing and ignoring the real CSKA-Sofia problem, as now we have there a page with wrong information ignoring all the reliable sources and despite numerous attempts nothing happens.
415:
I am not opposed to merging relevant info in to both of the club's articles as I've noticed that this topic isn't really covered in either of them yet. I'm not convinced that it warrants an article of its own, though.
506:
article.) That there is a heated dispute over which club -- if any -- has the right to claim the original club's history is a completely different matter. It's obviously been a bone of bitter contention on
427:
Yes, there should be at least a section about the dispute in both articles and the article PFC CSKA Sofia should be rewritten according to the sources, but the club fans are blocking any improvements.
192:
456:
I haven't participated in the CSKA debate so far and I am not sure it would do anything, as there was allready a RfC and everything was allready explained numerous times (especially by
502:
per nom; sports rivalry articles on
Knowledge have very high standards to clear, and this doesn't make it. (That being said, this so-called "rivalry" is already mentioned in the
159:
132:
127:
401:
Even if the rivalry is somehow considered not to be "notable" due to CRYSTAL, the CSKA dispute is very real and very notable and
Knowledge should adress it, that was my point.
136:
119:
293:
259:
276:
106:
91:
213:
478:
180:
525:
461:
451:
436:
422:
410:
396:
380:
362:
337:
330:- definitely interesting and potentially notable, but not currently. If anybody digs out Bulgarian-language sources please let me know.
319:
302:
285:
268:
251:
61:
356:
174:
170:
86:
79:
17:
310:
220:
442:
123:
100:
96:
474:
432:
406:
376:
186:
115:
67:
542:
345:
per nom; far too soon for this to be a notable rivalry. The two sources don't suggest this is a notable rivalry.
40:
470:
428:
402:
372:
350:
334:
538:
36:
516:
466:
57:
206:
511:'s talk page, but it doesn't need a separate article: it needs a sentence or two in that article,
503:
230:
457:
346:
331:
242:
238:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
537:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
53:
508:
446:
417:
391:
314:
297:
280:
263:
246:
234:
153:
533:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
149:
145:
141:
390:
which is not really appropriate for an encyclopaedia.
205:
313:'s list of association football-related deletions.
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
545:). No further edits should be made to this page.
292:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
258:Note: This discussion has been included in the
294:list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions
260:list of Football-related deletion discussions
219:
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
309:Note: This discussion has been included in
277:list of Events-related deletion discussions
464:
291:
274:
257:
7:
24:
237:and seems to be a clear case of
92:Introduction to deletion process
445:if you haven't already done so
441:Might be worth running through
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
526:07:09, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
462:11:28, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
452:11:07, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
437:10:25, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
423:10:04, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
411:09:09, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
397:08:56, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
381:21:50, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
363:02:36, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
338:18:13, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
320:08:14, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
303:08:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
286:08:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
269:08:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
252:08:10, 21 September 2020 (UTC)
62:08:22, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
1:
116:CSKA 1948–CSKA Sofia rivalry
68:CSKA 1948–CSKA Sofia rivalry
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
562:
535:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
80:Articles for deletion
311:WikiProject Football
504:FC CSKA 1948 Sofia
443:dispute resolution
513:properly sourced.
482:
469:comment added by
322:
305:
288:
271:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
553:
522:
449:
420:
394:
359:
353:
317:
308:
300:
283:
266:
249:
224:
223:
209:
157:
139:
77:
34:
561:
560:
556:
555:
554:
552:
551:
550:
549:
543:deletion review
518:
447:
418:
392:
357:
351:
315:
298:
281:
264:
247:
166:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
559:
557:
548:
547:
529:
528:
509:PFC CSKA Sofia
496:
495:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
488:
487:
486:
485:
484:
483:
471:Ludost Mlačani
429:Ludost Mlačani
403:Ludost Mlačani
384:
383:
373:Ludost Mlačani
365:
340:
324:
323:
306:
289:
272:
227:
226:
163:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
558:
546:
544:
540:
536:
531:
530:
527:
524:
523:
521:
514:
510:
505:
501:
498:
497:
480:
476:
472:
468:
463:
459:
455:
454:
453:
450:
444:
440:
439:
438:
434:
430:
426:
425:
424:
421:
414:
413:
412:
408:
404:
400:
399:
398:
395:
388:
387:
386:
385:
382:
378:
374:
369:
366:
364:
360:
354:
348:
344:
341:
339:
336:
333:
329:
326:
325:
321:
318:
312:
307:
304:
301:
295:
290:
287:
284:
278:
273:
270:
267:
261:
256:
255:
254:
253:
250:
244:
240:
236:
232:
222:
218:
215:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
172:
169:
168:Find sources:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
534:
532:
519:
517:
512:
499:
465:— Preceding
458:Chris Calvin
367:
347:power~enwiki
342:
327:
228:
216:
210:
202:
195:
189:
183:
177:
167:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
520:Ravenswing
231:WP:NRIVALRY
193:free images
243:WP:TOOSOON
239:WP:CRYSTAL
54:Fenix down
539:talk page
448:Spiderone
419:Spiderone
393:Spiderone
316:Spiderone
299:Spiderone
282:Spiderone
265:Spiderone
248:Spiderone
37:talk page
541:or in a
479:contribs
467:unsigned
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
500:Delete:
335:Snowman
199:WP refs
187:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
343:Delete
328:Delete
235:WP:GNG
229:Fails
171:Google
137:delete
50:delete
332:Giant
214:JSTOR
175:books
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
475:talk
433:talk
407:talk
377:talk
368:Keep
233:and
207:FENS
181:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
221:TWL
158:– (
481:)
477:•
435:)
409:)
379:)
361:)
355:,
296:.
279:.
262:.
245:.
201:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
473:(
431:(
405:(
375:(
358:ν
352:π
349:(
225:)
217:·
211:·
203:·
196:·
190:·
184:·
178:·
173:(
165:(
162:)
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.