519:- there are a lot of mentions of Codeforces in a BEFORE check, but many are primary in some way, most are non-independent/reliable and all the others (including those listed above) do not satisfy Sig Cov on Codeforces itself. Frequently they are 2-line throwaways while discussing the general concept, in others they discuss the founder without any details on the site itself. In the books & journal articles I looked at again most were a couple of lines, in a couple of cases they would grab examples from the site but without actually giving any Sig Cov on the website itself.
459:– Friends, Codeforces seem to be ranked among first 10000 on Alexa. If the educational resource with such a popularity is "not notable" then probably something is wrong with notability criteria. Surely this suggestion is not strict or official,
206:
332:
377:
to demonstrate notability. You linked to a Google
Scholar search for papers, but I don't see any of them discussing Codeforces directly and significantly; please cite specific papers.
404:
430:
159:
269:
289:
465:, I don't want to interfere anymore, but if this page is deleted, it would be hard to restrain from feeling that Knowledge (XXG) becomes another bit more broken :(
200:
91:
317:
106:
370:, but by a person they interviewed. All of the things you've mentioned are only minor mentions of the subject in the sources; what we need is
166:
86:
79:
17:
480:
572:
article name drops subject once ("young coders have started to flock to sites such as
Codeforces and Topcoder," and that's it). -
338:
132:
127:
100:
96:
136:
494:
221:
598:
188:
40:
119:
237:
A previous PROD was reversed but notability still has not been established. The subject is not notable, failing
444:
418:
182:
468:
568:
594:
524:
505:
476:
36:
178:
581:
550:
528:
509:
484:
448:
422:
393:
354:
301:
281:
261:
61:
57:
536:
There doesn't appear to be any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability as per
577:
361:
342:
331:
and
Techworm just to name a few, all third party – independent and reliable sources, as shown here
214:
371:
228:
559:
541:
537:
388:
256:
75:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
593:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
242:
238:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
520:
472:
297:
277:
123:
53:
194:
573:
563:
440:
414:
335:
461:
545:
340:. I believe this meets our current standards for inclusion here at Knowledge (XXG).
379:
247:
153:
293:
273:
320:
115:
67:
435:
434:
409:
408:
328:
324:
334:. In addition, also cited in scholarly papers, as shown here at
367:
313:
589:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
245:
as there is no significant coverage of it in reliable sources.
497:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
540:. None are intellectually independent. Topic fails GNG and
149:
145:
141:
213:
503:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
227:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
601:). No further edits should be made to this page.
429:Note: This discussion has been included in the
403:Note: This discussion has been included in the
288:Note: This discussion has been included in the
268:Note: This discussion has been included in the
405:list of Technology-related deletion discussions
431:list of Computing-related deletion discussions
270:list of Websites-related deletion discussions
8:
107:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
290:list of Russia-related deletion discussions
466:
428:
402:
287:
267:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
558:per nomination since subject fails
24:
366:Actually it wasn't ranked #1 by
92:Introduction to deletion process
1:
82:(AfD)? Read these primers!
618:
582:09:07, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
551:10:30, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
529:16:49, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
510:10:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
485:06:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
449:14:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
423:14:41, 14 July 2018 (UTC)
394:14:17, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
355:14:09, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
302:13:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
282:13:34, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
262:12:45, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
62:12:22, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
591:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
569:Bloomberg Businessweek
80:Articles for deletion
323:– Irish Tech News –
562:. Most sources are
319:. Coverage in the
512:
487:
471:comment added by
451:
425:
304:
284:
97:Guide to deletion
87:How to contribute
609:
508:
502:
500:
498:
464:
463:
445:✍️ Contributions
419:✍️ Contributions
391:
387:
385:
382:
365:
353:
259:
255:
253:
250:
232:
231:
217:
169:
157:
139:
77:
34:
617:
616:
612:
611:
610:
608:
607:
606:
605:
599:deletion review
513:
504:
493:
491:
460:
389:
383:
380:
378:
359:
341:
312:– Ranked #1 by
257:
251:
248:
246:
174:
165:
130:
114:
111:
74:
71:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
615:
613:
604:
603:
585:
584:
553:
531:
501:
490:
489:
488:
453:
452:
441:🗣️ Talk to me
426:
415:🗣️ Talk to me
399:
398:
397:
396:
336:Google Scholar
316:as shown here
306:
305:
285:
235:
234:
171:
110:
109:
104:
94:
89:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
614:
602:
600:
596:
592:
587:
586:
583:
579:
575:
571:
570:
565:
561:
557:
554:
552:
549:
548:
543:
539:
535:
532:
530:
526:
522:
518:
515:
514:
511:
507:
506:North America
499:
496:
486:
482:
478:
474:
470:
458:
455:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
432:
427:
424:
420:
416:
412:
411:
406:
401:
400:
395:
392:
386:
376:
374:
369:
363:
358:
357:
356:
352:
351:
348:
345:
339:
337:
333:
330:
326:
322:
318:
315:
311:
308:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
286:
283:
279:
275:
271:
266:
265:
264:
263:
260:
254:
244:
240:
230:
226:
223:
220:
216:
212:
208:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
180:
177:
176:Find sources:
172:
168:
164:
161:
155:
151:
147:
143:
138:
134:
129:
125:
121:
117:
113:
112:
108:
105:
102:
98:
95:
93:
90:
88:
85:
84:
83:
81:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
590:
588:
567:
566:, while the
555:
546:
533:
516:
492:
467:— Preceding
456:
372:
349:
346:
343:
309:
236:
224:
218:
210:
203:
197:
191:
185:
175:
162:
73:
49:
47:
31:
28:
521:Nosebagbear
473:Rodion Gork
373:significant
201:free images
462:(Redacted)
321:Daily Star
116:Codeforces
68:Codeforces
54:Randykitty
595:talk page
574:The Gnome
329:Bloomberg
37:talk page
597:or in a
560:WP:NCORP
547:HighKing
542:WP:NCORP
538:WP:NCORP
495:Relisted
481:contribs
469:unsigned
375:coverage
362:Shoessss
160:View log
101:glossary
39:or in a
564:primary
243:WP:NWEB
239:WP:NORG
207:WPÂ refs
195:scholar
133:protect
128:history
78:New to
556:Delete
534:Delete
517:Delete
384:umbolo
347:hoesss
325:Forbes
294:Hhkohh
274:Hhkohh
252:umbolo
179:Google
137:delete
50:delete
222:JSTOR
183:books
167:Stats
154:views
146:watch
142:links
16:<
578:talk
525:talk
477:talk
457:Keep
436:Tyw7
410:Tyw7
368:NDTV
314:NDTV
310:Keep
298:talk
278:talk
241:and
215:FENS
189:news
150:logs
124:talk
120:edit
58:talk
390:^^^
258:^^^
229:TWL
158:– (
580:)
544:.
527:)
483:)
479:•
447:)
443:•
433:.
421:)
417:•
407:.
327:–
300:)
292:.
280:)
272:.
209:)
152:|
148:|
144:|
140:|
135:|
131:|
126:|
122:|
60:)
52:.
576:(
523:(
475:(
439:(
413:(
381:w
364::
360:@
350:S
344:S
296:(
276:(
249:w
233:)
225:·
219:·
211:·
204:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
181:(
173:(
170:)
163:·
156:)
118:(
103:)
99:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.