464:. The article is an unsourced, one-sentence sub-stub asserting in its entirety: "X is an American football rivalry between Y and Z." I'm persuaded by Paul McDonald's argument about the complete lack of meaningful content. As Paul observes, if someone down the road digs and finds a solid basis for an article (be it as a "rivalry" or a highly notable series), deletion should be without prejudice to such efforts. However, as it stands, there is no basis for believing this series is a notable rivalry or otherwise sufficiently notable to warrant a stand-alone article.
245:. GNG states "If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to be suitable for a stand-alone article or list." Currently there are zero citations which reference an existing rivalry. So rivalry claim is not currently established. Searches do not return significant coverage in independent sources to meet GNG standards ("significant coverage") -I found only
332:
per nom. This article was created over 2 years ago, and it has never had any significant content or sourcing. Is there evidence that either college considers this a major rivalry in comparison to their other rivalries with fellow Ivy League schools?
207:
498:– Interestingly enough, I considered most Ivy League teams from neighboring states to be rivalries. After looking, this definitely isn't one... and the article isn't too detailed either (no real sources pointing to a rivalry).
430:
and do what you need to do to make
Knowledge (XXG) better. If it turns out it really is a noteworthy rivalry, there's no reason it cannot be re-created later when there is actual content for it.--
201:
348:
I'm not even sure this is a real thing; does the mere presence of an intra-conference series constitute a "rivalry"? In any case, there don't appear to be any sources that identify it as such.
297:
133:
128:
137:
366:
120:
160:
167:
385:
523:
404:
92:
107:
222:
189:
612:
595:
578:
542:
514:
490:
473:
456:
439:
415:
396:
377:
357:
340:
321:
288:
62:
261:
537:
509:
183:
179:
87:
80:
17:
229:
60:
572:
124:
101:
97:
554:
267:
629:
273:
195:
116:
68:
40:
314:
532:
504:
337:
246:
435:
255:
625:
591:
36:
238:
58:
566:
527:
499:
353:
334:
215:
452:
284:
608:
431:
408:
389:
370:
76:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
624:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
587:
427:
242:
485:
469:
308:
53:
558:
349:
258:
Harvard leads the series 60-14-1, it dates to 1877 and is continuous from 1948 onward.
448:
280:
604:
154:
557:'s The Game. We don't need an article for every 8*7/2 pairings in the League.
482:
465:
302:
553:
I don't see any special bowl or game name for this pairing as with
603:- doesn't seem to be much of a rivalry. No sources really either.
241:
says "Sports rivalries are not inherently notable" and defers to
620:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
150:
146:
142:
298:
list of
American football-related deletion discussions
214:
270:
is good for sourcing significant historical coverage
228:
367:list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
632:). No further edits should be made to this page.
522:Note: This discussion has been included in the
403:Note: This discussion has been included in the
384:Note: This discussion has been included in the
365:Note: This discussion has been included in the
296:Note: This discussion has been included in the
426:article without any content. Need a reason?
386:list of New York-related deletion discussions
8:
524:list of Schools-related deletion discussions
108:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
405:list of Sports-related deletion discussions
521:
402:
383:
364:
295:
264:Columbia is not generally competitive.
262:List of Ivy League football standings
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
117:Columbia–Harvard football rivalry
69:Columbia–Harvard football rivalry
256:Columbia 2018 Record Book, pg 24
93:Introduction to deletion process
279:neither returned much for me.
1:
555:Harvard-Yale football rivalry
613:14:17, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
596:11:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
579:20:40, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
543:22:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
515:22:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
491:01:02, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
474:18:12, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
457:05:10, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
440:13:02, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
416:06:22, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
397:06:22, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
378:06:22, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
358:04:41, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
341:04:37, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
322:01:54, 24 August 2018 (UTC)
289:23:50, 23 August 2018 (UTC)
83:(AfD)? Read these primers!
63:12:55, 31 August 2018 (UTC)
649:
622:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
81:Articles for deletion
268:site:newspapers.com
563:
251:Non-GNG callouts:
559:
545:
418:
399:
380:
324:
98:Guide to deletion
88:How to contribute
640:
575:
569:
562:
428:Ignore all rules
413:
394:
375:
320:
274:site:nytimes.com
233:
232:
218:
170:
158:
140:
78:
34:
648:
647:
643:
642:
641:
639:
638:
637:
636:
630:deletion review
573:
567:
560:
488:
409:
390:
371:
301:
175:
166:
131:
115:
112:
75:
72:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
646:
644:
635:
634:
616:
615:
598:
581:
547:
546:
518:
517:
493:
486:
476:
459:
442:
420:
419:
400:
381:
361:
360:
343:
335:Metropolitan90
326:
325:
292:
291:
277:
271:
265:
259:
236:
235:
172:
111:
110:
105:
95:
90:
73:
71:
66:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
645:
633:
631:
627:
623:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
599:
597:
593:
589:
585:
582:
580:
576:
570:
564:
556:
552:
549:
548:
544:
541:
540:
536:
535:
531:
530:
525:
520:
519:
516:
513:
512:
508:
507:
503:
502:
497:
494:
492:
489:
484:
480:
477:
475:
471:
467:
463:
460:
458:
454:
450:
446:
443:
441:
437:
433:
432:Paul McDonald
429:
425:
422:
421:
417:
414:
412:
406:
401:
398:
395:
393:
387:
382:
379:
376:
374:
368:
363:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
344:
342:
339:
336:
331:
328:
327:
323:
318:
317:
312:
311:
306:
305:
299:
294:
293:
290:
286:
282:
278:
275:
272:
269:
266:
263:
260:
257:
254:
253:
252:
249:
247:
244:
240:
231:
227:
224:
221:
217:
213:
209:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
185:
181:
178:
177:Find sources:
173:
169:
165:
162:
156:
152:
148:
144:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
113:
109:
106:
103:
99:
96:
94:
91:
89:
86:
85:
84:
82:
77:
70:
67:
65:
64:
61:
59:
57:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
621:
619:
600:
583:
550:
538:
533:
529:Redditaddict
528:
510:
505:
501:Redditaddict
500:
495:
478:
461:
444:
423:
411:CAPTAIN RAJU
410:
392:CAPTAIN RAJU
391:
373:CAPTAIN RAJU
372:
345:
329:
315:
309:
303:
250:
237:
225:
219:
211:
204:
198:
192:
186:
176:
163:
74:
54:
49:
47:
31:
28:
588:E.M.Gregory
239:WP:NRIVALRY
202:free images
276:is another
55:Ritchie333
626:talk page
561:AngusWOOF
447:per nom.
350:Chetsford
37:talk page
628:or in a
481:per nom
449:Jweiss11
281:UW Dawgs
161:View log
102:glossary
39:or in a
605:Adamtt9
208:WP refs
196:scholar
134:protect
129:history
79:New to
601:Delete
586:lame.
584:Delete
551:Delete
496:Delete
479:Delete
462:Delete
445:Delete
424:Delete
346:Delete
338:(talk)
330:Delete
243:WP:GNG
180:Google
138:delete
50:delete
574:sniff
483:Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ
466:Cbl62
304:L293D
223:JSTOR
184:books
168:Stats
155:views
147:watch
143:links
16:<
609:talk
592:talk
568:bark
487:Talk
470:talk
453:talk
436:talk
354:talk
285:talk
216:FENS
190:news
151:logs
125:talk
121:edit
248:.
230:TWL
159:– (
611:)
594:)
577:)
571:•
526:.
472:)
455:)
438:)
407:.
388:.
369:.
356:)
333:--
313:•
300:.
287:)
210:)
153:|
149:|
145:|
141:|
136:|
132:|
127:|
123:|
52:.
607:(
590:(
565:(
539:9
534:6
511:9
506:6
468:(
451:(
434:(
352:(
319:)
316:✎
310:☎
307:(
283:(
234:)
226:·
220:·
212:·
205:·
199:·
193:·
187:·
182:(
174:(
171:)
164:·
157:)
119:(
104:)
100:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.