485:: It's easy to forget what people do with encyclopaedias. How many kids through history have found themselves writing about medieval castles and knights, and turned to an encyclopaedia to find the names and functions of the different bits of armour? We would be failing in our duty at a very, very fundamental level if we didn't tell them. This page may need a lot of work, particularly with references, to bring it up to scratch, but it's a subject that ought to be here, and there's definitely salvageable stuff on the page.
506:. This is basically a list article, and as list articles go, it's a far better list than the usual crap-list articles that can be easily substituted by a category. Each entry has not only an illustration but also its own article with its own sources. Sources are not needed here. And AFD is the wrong venue for discussing cleanup. I recommend the nominator withdraw this. ~
241:, and maybe this could even be salvaged into making one, but at the same time there is likely a problem with even defining this concept (chronological range and geographical scope - European armor is not the same as Asian, for example). Not sure what is the best course of action here - rename and a list and leave unreferenced(?), rename to
334:
Agree that this isn't a great list. However, in theory it looks helpful especially since we lack a proper "medieval armour" article. Yes it's unreferenced, but there most certainly sources available since almost all linked articles have sources. It would need some overhaul, but I believe deleting it
607:
I don't understand either the nomination or the comments about this being a poor list - it's clear in scope, well organised, the listed items are all clearly described and illustrated. Feel free to retitle it to "list of..." if you must, but that's not an AfD matter. This is exactly the sort of
335:
would not be the right thing to do. The thing I would immediately scrap is the section about
Japanese armor – that one feels really off, as some are just links to images. Simply have a "see also" there that points to Japanese armour (for which, surprisingly, there is an article). --
236:
Unreferenced old article, a case when someone confused encyclopedia with a hosting place of an image description. At best, it's very incomplete list that needs renaming and verification. I am surprised we don't have an article about
205:
199:
139:
134:
166:
143:
308:
285:
126:
113:
526:(per Elemimele) too but can you direct me to a policy that states lists don't need references? If it can be found, I'll withdraw it and rename it myself.
98:
570:
this bad shape. If you want to delete every single article that needs rework, you would have to nominate each and every one currently tagged with
220:
187:
503:
130:
580:. And I can guarantee you that there are A LOT of these XD But most of them just need work, and shouldn't be outright deleted per
645:
617:
593:
538:
517:
494:
473:
451:
432:
344:
323:
300:
277:
181:
93:
86:
68:
17:
177:
122:
74:
262:
107:
103:
227:
566:, this discussion isn't about the article being in a bad shape (you are right about that), it's about whether it is
662:
469:
428:
40:
447:
193:
460:
The nom doesn't especially propose deletion; it talks vaguely about rewriting and renaming. It's classic
254:
658:
589:
574:
512:
340:
258:
36:
562:, conveniently already in the listed articles, and via the examples listed by Andrew above. And as per
581:
563:
465:
461:
424:
420:
486:
626:
613:
523:
490:
213:
443:
63:
639:
532:
355:
317:
294:
271:
82:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
657:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
358:
nomination of an article because it lacks sources. But sources are very easy to find and so
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
585:
507:
367:
363:
336:
558:
Lists absolutely do need references. Of course they do. But the point is, these references
242:
238:
609:
54:
359:
250:
246:
58:
635:
630:
553:
528:
313:
290:
267:
160:
629:
arguments sufficient, rethinkign this I belive this can be rescued. Ping
249:? Certainly can't leave this as it is as "components of Foo" is not a
608:
content I would expect to find in a general purpose encyclopaedia.
653:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
403:
A Record of
European Armour and Arms Through Seven Centuries
633:
for a fun project I may even try to help with a bit. --
156:
152:
148:
212:
253:concept (which is why we don't have articles like
408:Arms and Armour, from the 9th to the 17th Century
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
665:). No further edits should be made to this page.
307:Note: This discussion has been included in the
284:Note: This discussion has been included in the
388:The Complete Encyclopedia of Arms & Weapons
245:(ditto but will need more rewriting) or apply
309:list of Military-related deletion discussions
226:
8:
286:list of History-related deletion discussions
114:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
52:. Withdrawn by nominator.Topic is notable.
306:
283:
383:European Armour, Circa 1066 to Circa 1700
636:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
529:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
314:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
291:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
268:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus
7:
504:List of medieval armour components
24:
99:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
123:Components of medieval armour
75:Components of medieval armour
393:Brassey's Book of Body Armor
522:I do think this article is
263:components of mobile phones
89:(AfD)? Read these primers!
682:
464:, confusing AfD with AfC.
378:How to Read European Armor
646:05:40, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
618:13:54, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
594:13:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
539:05:34, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
518:19:01, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
495:15:46, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
474:16:58, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
452:15:17, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
433:11:18, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
370:apply. Examples include:
345:11:11, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
324:08:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
301:08:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
278:08:20, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
69:05:53, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
655:Please do not modify it.
354:This just seems to be a
32:Please do not modify it.
502:and possibly rename to
625:. While I rarely find
255:components of firearms
87:Articles for deletion
568:possible to overcome
55:(non-admin closure)
413:Armour and Weapons
259:components of T-34
516:
326:
303:
104:Guide to deletion
94:How to contribute
57:
673:
642:
579:
573:
557:
535:
510:
320:
297:
274:
231:
230:
216:
164:
146:
84:
66:
61:
53:
34:
681:
680:
676:
675:
674:
672:
671:
670:
669:
663:deletion review
644:
640:
577:
571:
564:Andrew Davidson
551:
537:
533:
398:Arms and Armour
322:
318:
299:
295:
276:
272:
243:medieval armour
239:medieval armour
173:
137:
121:
118:
81:
78:
64:
59:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
679:
677:
668:
667:
649:
648:
634:
620:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
544:
543:
542:
541:
527:
497:
479:
478:
477:
476:
455:
454:
436:
435:
417:
416:
415:
410:
405:
400:
395:
390:
385:
380:
372:
371:
348:
347:
328:
327:
312:
304:
289:
266:
234:
233:
170:
117:
116:
111:
101:
96:
79:
77:
72:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
678:
666:
664:
660:
656:
651:
650:
647:
643:
637:
632:
628:
624:
621:
619:
615:
611:
606:
603:
602:
595:
591:
587:
583:
582:WP:NOTCLEANUP
576:
569:
565:
561:
555:
550:
549:
548:
547:
546:
545:
540:
536:
530:
525:
521:
520:
519:
514:
509:
505:
501:
498:
496:
492:
488:
484:
481:
480:
475:
471:
467:
463:
462:WP:NOTCLEANUP
459:
458:
457:
456:
453:
449:
445:
444:Djm-leighpark
441:
438:
437:
434:
430:
426:
422:
421:WP:NOTCLEANUP
418:
414:
411:
409:
406:
404:
401:
399:
396:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
375:
374:
373:
369:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:
349:
346:
342:
338:
333:
330:
329:
325:
321:
315:
310:
305:
302:
298:
292:
287:
282:
281:
280:
279:
275:
269:
264:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
175:Find sources:
171:
168:
162:
158:
154:
150:
145:
141:
136:
132:
128:
124:
120:
119:
115:
112:
109:
105:
102:
100:
97:
95:
92:
91:
90:
88:
83:
76:
73:
71:
70:
67:
62:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
654:
652:
631:User:Uncle G
627:WP:ITSUSEFUL
622:
604:
575:unreferenced
567:
559:
524:WP:ITSUSEFUL
499:
482:
442:: per. nom.
439:
412:
407:
402:
397:
392:
387:
382:
377:
351:
331:
235:
223:
217:
209:
202:
196:
190:
184:
174:
80:
49:
47:
31:
28:
586:LordPeterII
508:Anachronist
337:LordPeterII
200:free images
641:reply here
534:reply here
319:reply here
296:reply here
273:reply here
659:talk page
610:Thryduulf
487:Elemimele
419:See also
368:WP:NEXIST
364:WP:BEFORE
265:, etc.).
65:(discuss)
37:talk page
661:or in a
623:Withdraw
356:drive-by
167:View log
108:glossary
60:Hawkeye7
39:or in a
554:Piotrus
251:notable
206:WP refs
194:scholar
140:protect
135:history
85:New to
466:Andrew
440:Delete
425:Andrew
360:WP:ATD
247:WP:TNT
178:Google
144:delete
560:exist
221:JSTOR
182:books
161:views
153:watch
149:links
16:<
614:talk
605:Keep
590:talk
584:. --
513:talk
500:Keep
491:talk
483:Keep
470:talk
448:talk
429:talk
366:and
352:Keep
341:talk
332:Keep
214:FENS
188:news
157:logs
131:talk
127:edit
50:keep
468:🐉(
427:🐉(
228:TWL
165:– (
616:)
592:)
578:}}
572:{{
493:)
472:)
450:)
431:)
423:.
362:;
343:)
311:.
288:.
261:,
257:,
208:)
159:|
155:|
151:|
147:|
142:|
138:|
133:|
129:|
638:|
612:(
588:(
556::
552:@
531:|
515:)
511:(
489:(
446:(
339:(
316:|
293:|
270:|
232:)
224:·
218:·
210:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
180:(
172:(
169:)
163:)
125:(
110:)
106:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.