Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Comparison of US and Chinese Military Armed Forces - Knowledge

Source 📝

204: 522:—these are both global superpowers with similar but different structures, of course there will be secondary sources comparing them—my concern is instead this is unencyclopedic and the problem with a lot of synthesized 134: 129: 138: 121: 198: 292: 161: 256: 467:, or an article discussing a hypothetical future armed conflict between the two. We don't need a table comparing what exact names their defence ministries have. 219: 186: 288: 284: 537: 510: 493: 476: 449: 442:
if it demonstrated just that in a text form, covering what was said by secondary sources, and a timeline. But that isn't what this article purports to be.
417: 395: 377: 318: 272: 248: 108: 63: 93: 349: 180: 280: 176: 340: 125: 352: 226: 117: 69: 331: 313: 328: 192: 88: 81: 17: 343: 408:, and if re-titling the article would align its scope more closely with the available sourcing, that would be a good thing. 361: 464: 439: 401: 334: 518:: my concern with this isn't that it's been covered before by external sources, as given in the listed sources above by 165: 102: 98: 554: 405: 40: 531: 443: 355: 489: 484:
per nom. This is a weird mixture of factoids. How is it a comparison to list wars they were involved in?
422:
My concern isn't the article title, it is whether or not a table in this nature is encyclopedic. A "for
308: 36: 337: 506: 413: 373: 212: 472: 390: 267: 243: 485: 346: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
549:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
365: 358: 297: 550: 523: 519: 502: 409: 369: 468: 383: 260: 236: 155: 54: 438:" so to speak. I would actually very much read an article called 545:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
235:
Seems wholly synthetic and redundant as far as lists go.
151: 147: 143: 211: 463:. It's probably worthwhile to have an article called 118:Comparison of US and Chinese Military Armed Forces 70:Comparison of US and Chinese Military Armed Forces 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 557:). No further edits should be made to this page. 530:and I don't think this to be very encyclopedic. 279:Note: This discussion has been included in the 255:Note: This discussion has been included in the 257:list of Military-related deletion discussions 225: 52:‎. I see a consensus to Delete this article. 8: 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 278: 254: 382:Cortador rephrased my thoughts better. 7: 465:China-United States military rivalry 440:China-United States military rivalry 402:China-United States military rivalry 400:Then would keeping and moving it to 24: 283:lists for the following topics: 94:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 501:. Completely pointless. -- 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 574: 538:00:18, 26 March 2024 (UTC) 511:14:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC) 494:23:13, 20 March 2024 (UTC) 477:09:57, 20 March 2024 (UTC) 450:00:21, 26 March 2024 (UTC) 418:23:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC) 396:17:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC) 378:01:41, 19 March 2024 (UTC) 319:00:18, 19 March 2024 (UTC) 273:00:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC) 249:00:04, 19 March 2024 (UTC) 64:01:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC) 391: 268: 244: 547:Please do not modify it. 404:be a workable solution? 293:United States of America 32:Please do not modify it. 528:where to draw the line? 368:search even conducted? 166:edits since nomination 82:Articles for deletion 406:WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP 321: 275: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 565: 534: 446: 393: 388: 316: 311: 304: 300: 281:deletion sorting 270: 265: 246: 241: 230: 229: 215: 159: 141: 79: 62: 34: 573: 572: 568: 567: 566: 564: 563: 562: 561: 555:deletion review 532: 444: 384: 359:non-synthesized 314: 309: 302: 298: 261: 237: 172: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 571: 569: 560: 559: 541: 540: 513: 496: 479: 458: 457: 456: 455: 454: 453: 452: 322: 276: 233: 232: 169: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 570: 558: 556: 552: 548: 543: 542: 539: 536: 529: 526:concerns is " 525: 521: 517: 514: 512: 508: 504: 500: 497: 495: 491: 487: 483: 480: 478: 474: 470: 466: 462: 459: 451: 448: 441: 437: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 398: 397: 394: 389: 387: 381: 380: 379: 375: 371: 367: 363: 360: 357: 354: 351: 348: 345: 342: 339: 336: 333: 330: 326: 323: 320: 317: 312: 307: 306: 305: 294: 290: 286: 282: 277: 274: 271: 266: 264: 258: 253: 252: 251: 250: 247: 242: 240: 228: 224: 221: 218: 214: 210: 206: 203: 200: 197: 194: 191: 188: 185: 182: 178: 175: 174:Find sources: 170: 167: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 61: 59: 58: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 546: 544: 533:microbiology 527: 515: 498: 486:Clarityfiend 481: 460: 445:microbiology 435: 431: 427: 423: 385: 324: 301: 296: 262: 238: 234: 222: 216: 208: 201: 195: 189: 183: 173: 75: 56: 55: 49: 47: 31: 28: 199:free images 520:Left guide 503:Necrothesp 410:Left guide 370:Left guide 551:talk page 366:WP:BEFORE 303:Quidditch 37:talk page 553:or in a 524:WP:NLIST 469:Cortador 386:Remsense 364:. Was a 341:treating 263:Remsense 239:Remsense 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 436:State B 428:State A 338:sources 335:several 291:, and 205:WP refs 193:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 535:Marcus 516:Delete 499:Delete 482:Delete 461:Delete 447:Marcus 430:, see 362:manner 356:direct 177:Google 139:delete 50:delete 347:topic 332:found 289:China 285:Lists 220:JSTOR 181:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 507:talk 490:talk 473:talk 414:talk 374:talk 344:this 329:I've 325:Keep 213:FENS 187:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 434:of 426:of 227:TWL 160:– ( 509:) 492:) 475:) 416:) 376:) 350:in 327:: 299:WC 295:. 287:, 259:. 207:) 164:| 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 60:iz 505:( 488:( 471:( 432:y 424:x 412:( 392:诉 372:( 353:a 315:✎ 310:☎ 269:诉 245:诉 231:) 223:· 217:· 209:· 202:· 196:· 190:· 184:· 179:( 171:( 168:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 57:L

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Liz
01:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
Comparison of US and Chinese Military Armed Forces

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Comparison of US and Chinese Military Armed Forces
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
edits since nomination
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.